
Mark Epstein has consistently stated that he does not believe his brother, Jeffrey Epstein, died by suicide and has instead argued that he was murdered while in federal custody. From the beginning, Mark has pointed to what he sees as glaring...
Loading summary
A
What's up, everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. Ever since Jeffrey Epstein's death, his brother Mark Epstein has been adamant that his brother was murdered and did not commit suicide. And that's something that Mark Epstein has said from the very beginning. And that's also why he brought in Dr. Michael Baden to observe the autopsy and give his opinion. And as far as what happened, well, we know that Michael Bodden had a different opinion than the medical examiner in New York. And according to Michael Baden, Jeffrey Epstein was murdered. And of course, according to the official narrative, Epstein killed himself inside of that jail cell. But the problem with this official narrative, like most of their official narratives, the facts just don't add up. And when you start putting the pieces together, it becomes rather obvious that, that there's a lot missing here and a lot we still haven't been told. So, of course, that leaves a lot of room for speculation, right, for people to come up with their own theories. And people have come up with a whole lot of them, whether it was the Mossad, the Royal Family, the Clintons, or, as Mark Epstein believes, that Donald Trump had something to do with Jeffrey Epstein's death. And I'm not going to sit here and tell you I know one way or the other, I have no idea. I'm only privy to the same evidence that you're getting. But looking at everything that's available and looking at the circumstances, there is no doubt in my mind that Jeffrey Epstein did not kill himself, at least not willingly. This article was published by the Independent, and the headline Trump accused of roll and Epstein's Death in explosive email sent FBI documents reveal. Mark Epstein said Saturday that the FBI never contacted him about his Trump claim. This article was authored by Eric Keller, Jeffrey Epstein's brother accused President Donald Trump of being involved in the late convicted sex offender's death in a tip sent to the FBI, according to a bombshell email revealed in the Department of Justice release of Epstein files. Now, look, we have to be very cautious about what we believe and what we don't believe. Not every tip that's filed is true. Not every allegation is provable. And we have to keep that in mind. Just because there was an email sent doesn't make it the truth. But here's the biggest problem. The DOJ and the FBI usually can say, look, we know what we're doing. You can trust us. And here's the track record showing that you can trust us, right? They can't do that. Nobody trusts them. So when that trust is gone, how can we have any confidence that they're doing the right thing, that they're following every tip, every lead, when history has shown us clearly that they have no desire to follow this where it goes? And that's the whole reason the scope of the investigation was always so narrow. They didn't want to follow this to the actual endpoint because they knew that, that the end point leads directly to the people that pay the bills. On February 22, 2023, Mark Epstein submitted an online tip to the FBI's National Threat Operations center alleging that Epstein was murdered in his prison cell at the Metropolitan Correctional center in New York in 2019 following his conviction on child sex offenses rather than dying by suicide. Well, he wasn't convicted. He was indicted, first of all. And second of all, there was a lot more going on there than just child sex offenses. The independent confirmed in a phone call with Mark Epstein on Saturday that he submitted the tip, which contained two spelling errors as seen in the files. It was then forwarded by an unidentified threat Intake examiner at the FBI and TOC to a special agent. And my biggest problem, like I just said, is that the FBI and the DOJ is untrustworthy when we're talking about this topic. They've proven time and time again they have no desire to follow this the way they should. So why should anyone think this would be any different? Why should anyone think that the FBI was pursuing this in a manner that is acceptable? The disgraced financier's brother included his personal contact information and IP address in the submission, both of which are redacted in the publicly released file. Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in his jail cell, the tip read. I have reason to believe he was killed because he was about to name names. I believe President Trump authorized his murder. Now, look, even if you don't believe that that's true, seems like something you would investigate, right? Anything, anything that has to do with this man is something that needs to be investigated. You can't have a high profile inmate like this die and not have a real investigation. Because make no mistake, there was not a real investigation. And remember, Epstein was never even really perp walked. He was arrested getting off his plane in Teterboro and put directly into a car and taken away. So it wasn't like Jeffrey Epstein was ever given the business, was never treated the way, say, Diddy was. And look, I'm not here to defend Diddy, as you all know, not exactly my favorite person. But balls and strikes are balls and strikes. If you're going to treat one person that way, that's the way everybody should be treated. Why is Jeffrey Epstein getting the benefit of the doubt and being granted the ability and the privilege to not be embarrassed? The only thing that he should be getting is thrown directly into a volcano. He shouldn't be getting any kind of benefits or special privileges. But every time you turn around, that's exactly what Epstein was getting. In the report's additional information section, he added, feel free to contact me, noting that his relationship or connection to Jeffrey Epstein is obvious. Epstein's brother told the Independent that neither the FBI nor any other law enforcement contacted him to follow up or investigate his claim. He declined any further comment. I'm sure that he has something cooking in the background, and we know that he wants a new investigation into his brother's death, and he says he has new information and evidence that points to it being a homicide. So I'm sure everybody wants to see that. A White House spokesperson directed the Independent to this section of a January 3rd DOJ press release after the agency published over 3 million additional pages. Responsive to the Epstein Files Transparency Act. This production may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos, as everything that was sent to the FBI by the public was included in the production that is responsive to the act. Oh, isn't that nice? They're very transparent. Everything was included. The whole idea was to confuse you. That's why it was dumped the way it was dumped, with no order, with no kind of cataloging. The bad news for them, though, is that there's plenty of people out here that know exactly what we're looking for. So you can try and confuse the masses, but you're not going to be able to confuse everybody. Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear, the claims are unfounded and and false. And if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already. The release reads. Imagine the DOJ releasing that and imagine anyone thinking it's okay, and all the people that do think it's okay. I cannot wait until the next administration takes over and they do the same thing and all of you are crying holy hell about it because I don't wanna hear you folks had a chance right now to step up and do the right thing and hold people accountable, but instead you'd rather dick, ride and glaze some dude who doesn't give a about you. So later on down the road, when this happens again, and it most surely will I don't want to hear anything. I don't want to hear any crying. I don't want to hear about unfair. It is. I don't want to hear about how you're being targeted politically, whatever, because right now you have a chance to step up and demand real change. And a lot of people out there are refusing to do it. So when that pendulum swings the other way and the quote, unquote, other team takes control, well, you think they're not going to follow the same blueprint? They most certainly are. The Independent has contacted the FBI for comment. Last month, Mark Epstein, a real estate developer, doubled down on his previous claim that he believes his brother did not die by suicide. Jeffrey was murdered, and more autopsy facts will be coming out in February that prove it, he told News Nation. Yo, I can't wait to see those facts. I'd love to see the autopsy and what he has that backs up his assertions. Because like everything else, when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, I don't close the door on until we have evidence. And that goes for everything. There are only three ways to die in prison, he continued suicide, natural causes or murder. And Jeff was murdered. I want to know who killed him and on whose behalf. In 2025, he told BBC Newsnight and news Nation that his brother had dirt on powerful people, including during the 2016 election, when Jeffrey Epstein allegedly said revealing what he knew about the candidates could have canceled the election. Well, now people are starting to realize he wasn't bullshitting around when he said that the kind of dirt this dude had on people was insane. And it wasn't all compromise sexually created. A lot of it was financial, and a lot of people continue to miss that part of the story. And I understand why. It's not salacious. It's not the kind of story that really rings the bells, but it's the kind of story that ends in arrests. And for me, this isn't about being salacious. This isn't about talking about the most shocking parts of this. It's about getting to a point where there's accountability. And for me, and I only speak for me, that's always been the goal. And of course, going after the most salacious parts of the story is Jeffrey Epstein, the West Mesa bone collector is Jeffrey Epstein an alien from Uranus. You know, those kinds of stories, they're the ones that lead, there's no doubt about it. But when you really get down to it, those are all dead ends. They're not going to lead to accountability. They're not going to lead to people ending up in bracelets, you know what will the many financial crimes that all these scumbags were engaged in. While Jeffrey Epstein never shared details directly, his brother said he was certain his brother also had dirt on Trump. Trump called Jeffrey Epstein a terrific guy in 2002 interview with new York magazine, adding that the pair shared an affinity for beautiful women. In 2019, after Epstein's arrest, Trump told reporters, I had a fallen out with him a long time ago. I haven't spoken to him for 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you. Mark Epstein also claimed that Trump's public statements about the matter were were untrue. You could see in the emails Trump could deny it all he wants, but it's pretty clear everything Trump says is a lie. He told News Nation in November. So look, I think that Mark Epstein has a solid case here and I'm very interested to see what kind of evidence he's going to bring to the table to back up his assertions. So like usual, we'll keep an eye on things and when we have some information one way or the other, we'll will get it added to the catalog. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.
Episode: Mark Epstein Says His Brother Was Murdered And He Thinks Trump Is Responsible
Host: Bobby Capucci
Date: July 1, 2026
In this episode, host Bobby Capucci delves into the explosive claim by Mark Epstein—Jeffrey Epstein’s brother—that Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in his jail cell, and that former President Donald Trump was involved. Capucci scrutinizes recently released FBI documents, discusses the credibility of Mark Epstein’s allegations, the broader lack of public trust in law enforcement and the Department of Justice (DOJ), and reiterates the urgency for real accountability and transparent investigation in cases involving the powerful. The episode is rich in commentary on institutional failures, sensational claims, and the complexity of the Epstein case.
“As far as what happened, well, we know that Michael Bodden had a different opinion than the medical examiner in New York... According to Michael Baden, Jeffrey Epstein was murdered.” —Bobby Capucci (01:00)
“I have reason to believe he was killed because he was about to name names. I believe President Trump authorized his murder.” —Mark Epstein, as quoted by Bobby Capucci (07:26)
“When that trust is gone, how can we have any confidence that they're doing the right thing, that they're following every tip, every lead, when history has shown us clearly that they have no desire to follow this where it goes?” —Bobby Capucci (04:35)
“Jeff was murdered. I want to know who killed him and on whose behalf.” —Mark Epstein, via News Nation (18:08)
“Why is Jeffrey Epstein getting the benefit of the doubt and being granted the ability and the privilege to not be embarrassed?” —Bobby Capucci (09:22)
“You had a chance right now to step up and do the right thing and hold people accountable, but instead you'd rather dick, ride and glaze some dude who doesn't give a about you.” —Bobby Capucci (15:28)
This episode underscores the ongoing controversy and unanswered questions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death, highlighting Mark Epstein’s unyielding belief in his brother’s murder and his assertion of Donald Trump’s involvement. Host Bobby Capucci urges a skeptical, evidence-driven approach while criticizing institutional failures and public complacency. The case remains open, with listeners encouraged to watch for new revelations promised by Mark Epstein.
For more document links and references, see the episode description.