← The Epstein Chronicles
The Epstein Chronicles
Mega Edition: Alex Acosta, The 2011 Statement About Epstein And The Missing Emails (7/8/26)
00:46:03
The missing Acosta emails refer to a nearly year-long gap in the inbox of Alexander Acosta, then the U.S. Attorney in Miami, during the most critical stretch of the Jeffrey Epstein negotiations. According to reporting on a court filing by attorneys...
Loading summary
Transcript48 lines
- [00:00]
A
Nobody does insurance like the Zebra. Because at the Zebra we're really into finding you savings on auto insurance. With real insurance advisors and top insurance partners, find out how much you can save today@the zebra.com Savings will vary. Not all will save. At the Zebra we save you money on auto insurance like Jessica who saved hundreds.
- [00:21]
B
Small weekend, here I come.
- [00:23]
A
And Jeremy who saved over $380 with the zebra.com. whoa.
- [00:29]
B
I can't wait to tell my wife.
- [00:30]
A
The Zebra monitors your insur and alerts you of savings so you never have to second guess your price. Nobody does insurance like the Zebra. Find out how much you can save today@the zebra.com Savings will vary. Not all will save.
- [00:45]
C
And welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. One of the things I like to do when we're discussing this case is go back in time and look at news articles from years gone by and you can see how this story has changed over time, how it's transformed over time, and how the legacy media loves to use revisionist history, talking about how nobody knew what was going on with Jeffrey Epstein. Well, I say that's a bunch of bs. And the proof of that is all of these articles that you can still find if you just do a simple search that were telling the story about who Jeffrey Epstein was. Here's the truth. The people that were still associating with them, the people that were still hanging out with them, they didn't care. That's the truth. So today we're going to go back in time once again and go all the way back to 2011 to an article from the Daily Beast. This article was authored by Conchita Sarnoff and Lee Aitken. Headline, jeffrey Epstein, how the Hedge Fund Mogul Pedophile Got Off Easy. So at least they call him a pedophile in the headline, right? And this was in 2011. Nowadays, you can't even get the legacy media to admit that he committed crimes, right? Oh, his alleged victims, his alleged trafficking survivors. No, nothing alleged about it. Documents obtained by the Daily Beast reveal how pedophile hedge fund mogul Jeffrey Epstein escaped hefty jail sentence despite overwhelming evidence of sex crimes. With dozens, that's dozens, folks, of young girls, Conchita Sarnoff and Lee Aiken on how the fear and intimidation experienced by survivors during pre trial proceedings combined with a ferocious protracted campaign to undermine the prosecution culminated in a set of charges that became a virtual slap on the wrist. Now, we all know that 2022, we all know the story well, but Remember, this is 2011 when this story was published. So for all the people out there that act like they had no idea what was going on, that's a lie. This was out in the daily beast. This was out in other publications. So I don't want to hear, we had no idea who epstein was. Why is prince andrew palling around with this dude? It is proving difficult for hedge fund manager and registered sex offender jeffrey epstein to avoid the glare of media scrutiny. British tabloids most recently cried foul over the shabby royal comportment of prince andrew in agreeing to be the guest of acknowledgment of the pedophile. But the larger mystery surrounding epstein, who completed a 13 month sentence for soliciting prostitution for from a minor in 2010, has remained unsolved. How did the hedge fund mogul manage to finesse the kind of sex crimes allegations Typically associated with a hefty prison sentence? And that's really what it comes down to, right? How does someone like jeffrey epstein avoid serious jail time for these obviously very, very serious crimes that usually carry a very long time in jail, 20, 30, 40, 50 years. But he gets 13 months in a county stockade, a county lockup, and nobody's supposed to have any questions about that, huh? For the first time, the u. S. Attorney who oversaw the epstein prosecution in florida's southern district Is commenting publicly on the case in a letter released exclusively to the daily beast. This letter, along with other correspondence unearth in our reporting Sheds new light on the no holds barred battle waged by epstein's lawyers to evade the full exercise of prosecutorial power. So Remember, this is 2011 before Alexander Acosta was even considered for a role in a presidential administration. Why would anyone, and I, I ask this honestly, why would anyone have alex acosta as part of their administration? Are you kidding me right now? You don't have people that are vetting people like acosta for these positions. All it would take is a simple google search or a duck duck, go search or whatever browser you use and you could come up with this information. So why would anyone want this guy to be part of their administration? Some of the most shocking allegations against epstein surfaced only after the conclusion of an FBI probe in civil suits brought by his survivors. For example, the claim that three 12 year old French girls were delivered to him as a birthday present. But the feds did identify roughly 40 young women, most of them underage at the time, who described being lured to epstein's palm beach home on the pretense of giving a massage for money, Then pressured into various sex acts as well as the Balkan sex slave Epstein allegedly boasted of purchasing from her family when she was just 14. So that's Nadia Marcinkova, obviously. Right again, now that we have hindsight to guide us. We know what that is. And we also know that it was Jean Luc Brunel who allegedly provided these 12 year old triplets to Jeffrey Epstein for his birthday for him to abuse. We heard that right from Virginia. We've heard it from other sources. And that's why I am so adamant at this point that Nadia Marcin Kova should be looked at in a different manner than these other women because she was brought in at such a young age. You're purchased from. Think about it for a minute, okay? Your parents sell you to some disgustoid and then you end up in their atmosphere, in their orbit, and your whole life, this kind of abuse is normalized. So of course you're going to think that this is the right way to go. Like this is how normal people live. So when we're talking about Nadia Marcinkova, it's a whole different ball of wax for me. And my opinion on her and her involvement here has evolved over time. When I first started looking at this, I just lumped her in with the other core four members. But when you get down into it and you get into the weeds and you follow the evidence, to me anyway, it's rather obvious that Nadia Marcinkova was somebody who was groomed and was dragged along into this. More recently, a big cash payment from Mail on Sunday coaxed one of Epstein's main survivors out of anonymity to describe what she claims were her years as a teenage sex toy. This survivor, Virginia Roberts, produced a photo of herself with Prince Andrew in 2001 and reported that Epstein paid her $15,000 to meet the prince, then 17 years old. She claims that she was abused by Epstein and loaned to his friends from the age of 15. Now again, another girl who was brought into his orbit when she was young. And you see, there's the issue for me. If you're brought in, we're when you're malleable, right? A young teenage girl, a little bit younger than that, maybe even it's a lot easier for these sick bastards to manipulate, manipulate you mentally and for them to create this sort of picture in your brain that what you're doing is okay. And Jeffrey Epstein and Galaine Maxwell were professionals at that. Sex crimes of the kind Roberts alleges took place typically carry a term of 10 to 20 years in federal prison. Yet when all was said and done, Epstein served his scant year plus one month in a private wing of the palm beach jail and was granted a 16 hour per day free pass to leave the premises for work. Now, how many of you out there have friends who have been to prison or maybe yourself? You ever afforded that kind of those kind of privileges? You could leave jail, go to work, do whatever you want. Of course you weren't. Because you're not rich, because you weren't running around with a bunch of other so called elite. A daily beast examination into the inner workings of Epstein's defense strategy reveals how the fear and intimidation experienced by survivors during pre trial proceedings combined with a ferocious protracted campaign to undermine the prosecution, summed up as the best defense is an all star offense, culminated in a set of charges that became a virtual slap on the wrist for the globe trotting financier for the pedophile. And that's why I'm so adamant about a full look into what went on down in Florida as well. I know I go hard on the sdny and that's because they're considered the most elite prosecutor or prosecutorial office in the nation, right? So they should be doing a better job. But what went on down in Florida, yo, this is a straight up abortion of justice. The prosecutors in Florida and everybody involved down in Florida, they should all be looked at. Because Epstein manipulated everything that happened down here. He was able to finagle and maneuver himself into a position of only getting 13 months. And this next segment was the actual letter from Alexander Acosta to the delhi beast. Over the past weeks, I have read much regarding Mr. Jeffrey Epstein. Our words opening an extraordinary letter written by r. Alexander Acosta, who served as u. S. Attorney for the southern district of Florida during Epstein's criminal investigation. Mr. Acosta goes on to detail how in 2005, a young girl first brought sex crimes allegations to the palm beach police department, which sought felony charges against Epstein. Subsequently, however, the state attorney agreed to charge him only with one count of aggravated assault with no intent to commit a felony. Acosta writes. He notes that such a charge would have resulted in no jail time, no registration as a sexual offender, and no responsibility for for restitution to Epstein's underage survivors. So basically what he's saying is he's the hero here, folks. Mr. No spine, Limpy ass backbone. Alex acosta set himself up as the hero. You're no hero. You're just another yes man that went along with this absolute travis. Frustrated by the state attorney's decision making, the police referred the case to the FBI, which handed it to the US Attorney General's office. After reviewing the charges, federal prosecutors agreed that the state charges were insufficient. Acosta writes in a script that could have been lifted from law and order. His team gave Epstein two choices. Plead to more serious state felony charges or prepare for federal felony trial. Well, that never happened, right? And you might ask yourselves, why is that? Well, we're about to find out. The next passage is where things get really interesting. What followed was a year long assault on the prosecution and prosecutors. Epstein had assembled a world class legal team, including Allen I kept my pants On Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr and Roy Black, best known for having defended William Kennedy Smith against rape charges in Palm Beach. One member of the defense team warned me that the office's excess zeal enforcing a good man to serve time in jail might be the subject of a book if we continued. Acosta writes in his in his view, excessive zeal more aptly describes the actions in Epstein's camp. Defense counsel investigated individual prosecutors and their family. So why didn't you put a stop to it? Your prosecutors let Jeffrey Epstein and his lawyers run roughshod over you and your whole ass office. Who's to blame for that if it's not? You often fail to negotiate in good faith. They would obtain concessions as part of a negotiation and agree to proceed only to change their minds and appeal the office's position to Washington. Oh, well, there you go folks. Let me be very clear once again. It was not Alexander Acosta making these decisions on his own. He just told you that. Okay, they appealed to Washington D.C. who was in D.C. at the time? Mukazi. Right. Well, just follow the trail. Who was McKayzy associated with? What were his associations? And then you come to the reasoning at how Epstein and his lawyers can manipulate this situation. Remember, you're not paying for your lawyer for what he does in the courtroom. You're paying for who he knows behind the scenes, how many judges chambers he can access. And when you have the team that Jeffrey Epstein had, do you really think that these guys had trouble accessing the very highest levels of DC or any of these judges? Of course not. That's what you're paying for. That's why it costs you 25 hundi an hour. Undeterred, Acosta stuck to his position that Epstein must agree to the three criteria he he had laid out. Jail time, registration as a sex offender, and restitution to survivors. Acosta's account is supported by a second document obtained by the Daily Mail be by the Daily Beast a five Page letter written by Assistant US Attorney Anne Marie Vilafana to another of Epstein's lawyers, Jay Lefkowitz. During the period when both sides were hammering out the eventual plea agreement, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the office to convince the office not to prosecute, Villafano writes, conjuring the degree of pushback apparently central to the team's strategy. Those presentations were unsuccessful. Vilafana also mentions her efforts to ensure that Epstein would serve time in a federal prison camp and and not a state prison, which would be far rougher environment, particularly for a child molester. So Anvilafana an Marie Vilafana was over here acting like she was helping the survivors, but at the same time playing ball with Epstein's lawyers. So she was playing both sides of the fence here. And that's always been my interpretation of her involvement. Villafano marshals these facts in the process of strenuously disputing apparent charges of misconduct by the defense. I continued to work with you in a professional manner even after I learned that you had been proceeding in bad faith for several weeks, thinking that you would fool our Office into letting Mr. Epstein plead to a non registerable offense. And the whole entire time that they were trying to maneuver, they were reaching out to the bosses in dc, they were reaching out to the Mukesi's office and the Department of Justice leadership. What do you think they were doing? Just hanging out, eating cereal? At another point in her letter, Vilafana refers to an apparent allegation of self dealing in the selection of an outside attorney who would represent the 40 odd survivors identified in the probe. In a somewhat unusual arrangement, Epstein agreed not to contest his liability in any civil suits brought by these survivors and in fact pay for lawyers to represent them. So take all of the alleged and shove it, okay? Epstein admitted numerous times that he did this and he did it with hubris and in a straight up in your face manner. And nobody had anything to say to him, huh? Nobody wanted to stop him. Yeah. Thirteen months, man. That's all you're going to get for this. No big deal. In her letter, Vilafana denies any personal interest in the choice of attorney and goes on to say, your attacks on me and on the survivors establish why I wanted to find someone whom I could trust with safeguarding the survivor's best interests in the face of intense pressure from an unlimited number of highly skilled and well paid attorneys. Imagine being some girl from the other side of the tracks accusing somebody like Jeffrey Epstein of this and then getting faced with all of these high profile attorneys that are basically ruining your life. If they're so brazen and so comfortable going after prosecutors, do you really think they'd have any qualms going after survivors? Responding to a request for comment on Acosta's account of events, Roy Black wrote the Daily Beast on Thursday that I can't reply to a letter I haven't received. I can't give a reason to response without examining the files and. And being able to refresh my recollection of events that occurred years ago. Black went on, I do not believe any of the things you mention occurred, except for the fact we did exercise our right to appeal to the Department of Justice to determine if a federal crime had been committed. There you go again, folks. Remember what I tell you about the little golden nuggets that we get here, that it's his lawyer telling you, not me, okay? This isn't me telling you. It's his lawyer, Roy Black telling you that they appealed to the department of Justice. That means mukazi, that means the bosses about all of this and what was going on. Now, you mean to tell me that those guys had nothing to do with the slap on the wrist here? Huh? Okay, it's all Acosta's fault. Other Epstein attorneys contacted by the Daily Beast did not respond. The U. S. Attorney's office for the southern district of Florida had no comment. Why did Acosta decide to voice his opinions now? In part, he clearly is reacting to ongoing criticism that Epstein's puny punishment did not fit his crimes. Some may feel that the prosecution should have been tougher. Acosta writes, evidence that has come to light since 2007 may encourage that view. Many survivors have since spoken out. Physical evidence has since been discovered. Acosta may also have chosen to come forward now because on Monday, attorneys for a number of those survivors filed the suit under the victims crimes rights act to challenge the non prosecution agreement that ultimately resulted from all the wrangling, claiming that they were not consulted. The U.S. attorney's office, now led by Wilfredo A. Ferrar, has indicated it will file a response to the suit on April 7th. Now remember, this was 2007 and they brought this suit in 2000. Excuse me, 2011. And they brought the suit in 2011, and it was still ongoing all the way through all these years. Now ask yourselves, why is that the case? Don't you think a case like this would be heard in a timely manner and not dragged out through the courts? The Fact is this. The government doesn't want to be transparent here. They don't want to give you all of the details of what went down because it makes them look absolutely horrible. In his letter, Acosta also takes issue with the way Epstein's sentence was carried out. Although the terms of confinement in a state prison are a matter appropriately, appropriately left to the state of Florida, without doubt, the treatment that he received while in state custody undermine the purpose of a jail sentence. Indeed, Epstein's brief confinement likely reinforced a perception that he had merely succumbed to a nuisance suit. Such a gross misapprehension would help account for the apparent ease with which Epstein has rejoined the ranks of the social elite. 2011 folks, remember, this is before the second arrest, when all of these people welcomed him back with open arms. Katie Couric, Woody Allen, and George Stepanopoulos, among others, attended a dinner party he hosted for Prince Andrew in December. And New York authorities seem to be either unaware or unconcerned that his Upper east side home is within 1,000ft of an Episcopal preschool in violation of sex offender laws. You know, it's all just such a big ass joke to these, these people, all of these people who are supposed to safeguard folks who are supposed to protect the vulnerable. They made a big joke out of all of this and acted like these survivors and what they went through didn't matter. And they thought they were never going to have to hear about it again. They thought this boomerang was never going to come back and slap them in the head. Well, guess what? The boomerang has arrived and the slapping has begun. Yet a source tells the Daily Beast that Epstein's legal troubles may not be over. Talk about foreshadowing, huh? It is possible that as an outgrowth of the 2007 Florida investigation, federal investigators are now looking into allegations of money laundering and other financial misdeeds. Boy, wouldn't. Wouldn't that be nice? How long have I been telling you this is a financial crime? They knew it all the way back then. And they didn't chase it down because people like Mukazi and the bosses at the DOJ told them not to. Now, can I prove that with documentation? I cannot. But if you add up all of the things that we have heard from Acosta and others involved, it's obvious who was pulling the strings here. And if you think some second rate Florida state attorney general, or I mean, federal attorney general, is going to be pulling the strings of an investigation like this into Epstein, I don't know what to tell you because this comes from on high foreign. Notes. At the end of her letter to Lefkowitz, you accuse me of broadening the scope of the investigation without any foundation for doing so by adding charges of money laundering and violations of a money transmitting business to the investigation. Again, I consulted with the Justice Department's money laundering section about my analysis. The duty officer agreed with my analysis. So that's the FBI telling you right there, folks, that there was money laundering going on. A whole ass lot of it, too. Vilafana knew it, their office knew it, the DOJ knew it, and they refused to act. So keep this all in mind, what we just talked about. Next time you hear somebody talking about how this is all Acosta's fault. It is not. He is somebody who played a part and a big part, no doubt about it. But he ended up really being the fall guy. And when we use fall guys, we don't ever get to the real problem. Dewey. So the people who were really at the levers of power here, the people who were really making the decisions, once again get off scot free. And we turn all of our anger, all of our rancor towards Acosta. And while he definitely deserves it, again, I don't. I have to keep reiterating that because I don't want you to think I'm saying, oh, Acosta is a victim here. He is not. He is a spineless coward who should have stepped up to the plate. But I'm not willing to just stop there. Other people might just want to go hunting for a regular old deer, right? Me, I'm looking to go trophy hunting. And that means I want the people who are behind the decisions. Those are the people that need to answer questions because they're the ones who made these decisions and let Jeffrey Epstein, in the wake of those decisions, continue to abuse people. Somebody needs to be accountable for it. And all these years later, unfortunately, still nobody is. All right, folks, it's going to do it for this episode. If you'd like to contact me, you can do that@bobby capuchirotonmail.com that's B O B B Y C A P U C c I@protonmail.com youm can also find me on Twitter and at bo b b y underscore cap ucci the link that I discussed can be found in the description box.
- [25:17]
B
It comes to light now that a year's worth of emails for Mr. Acosta vanished from 2007 to 2008.
- [25:29]
C
Where did those emails go?
- [25:32]
B
Oh, but the government says it's just a glitch it affected a lot of people. Does anybody really believe that? So it was a glitch with the video cameras, it's a glitch with the emails. Everything's just coincidence. And none of this adds up to a much darker, more devious picture, huh? That's what you would have us believe? Well, I'm sorry, but I don't believe it. I don't believe it for one single minute. These emails just happen to disappear, huh? I'm sure the NSA has them. They have all the metadata and all the other information from everybody else. Pretty sure that they probably have those emails too, don't they? I find it very hard to believe that a year's worth of emails from this crucial period of 2007 and 2008 just happened to disappear. And it's a glitch, you say? Now we know that Jeffrey Epstein had some very powerful friends for a very long time that spanned numerous presidencies. Did somebody in power pull on a lever to get rid of these emails, knowing how damning they were?
- [26:56]
C
What it.
- [26:56]
B
It's above these people. They don't have the capability to do something like this. Of course they do. We're talking about the FBI, we're talking about the intelligence services. There is nothing out of the realm of possibility for these people. These are kingmakers. These are nation topper. They topple nations, these people. You think it's above their pay grade to get rid of some emails that might, you know, lead to a place they don't want anyone to go? And look, I'm not saying that's exactly what happened, right? I don't have the evidence for that. But what I am saying is this. I don't believe that all these coincidences are just coincidences. There are way too many of them around this case. I am not a conspiracy theorist in the least. You'll never catch me piping off about weird, wild, nonsensical bullshit. But when things don't add up, they don't add up. There is way too much that has occurred in this case, from Jeffrey Epstein's death all the way back to this first investigation that they would want us to believe is just coincidence. And I. I'm sorry, I don't believe that this, it's statistically possible for all of this to just be coincidence. Not when you add up everything around the case, everything that was Jeffrey Epstein in general, and then you add in all these coincidences and you look at the big picture, and it's really a hard pill to swallow to buy that narrative that they're trying to sell. And with these emails, of course they're going to say, oh, it affected multiple people or a bunch of people and. But I honestly, I don't believe it. Again, a glitch? Or was it something that was done on purpose by. Who the hell knows? Again, we know that Epstein was rolling with some of the most powerful people in the world. Prime ministers, presidents, leaders of industry, leaders of science and academia. You don't think it would be possible for insert whoever to try and clean up a little bit of the mess by getting rid of these emails? I mean, it's something that we have to talk about and think about at the very least. I just, I'm not, I'm not willing to buy their explanations anymore. They've been nothing but untruthful with us. They've been very guarded. They've been everything but transparent. And they have sold us some whoppers expecting us just to buy right in. Folks, I'm here to tell you, I am not buying it. They honestly think we're going to believe anything that they say. And the sad part is there's a good portion of the populace that believes every single thing they hear on the news. They don't bother to dig deeper. They have this trust in the media to do the right thing. And while I wish I could have that sort of trust, it just is not reality. The legacy media does not have anyone's best interest at heart. And this whole entire situation was just going to be blown up, forever blown up. And these people are never, ever going to be able to sweep this under the rug. I don't care about missing emails. I don't care about all the coincidences in the world. I don't care about the legacy media running cover for them. We're just gonna keep on keeping on and we're gonna keep digging and we're gonna keep talking about these articles on a daily basis. And these people are not getting off the hook. I'm sorry, I am, I'm. I'm not going to just let it go by the wayside and be like, oh, yeah, just missed missing emails. It's not like this is, you know, a missing email chain from a Taco Bell employee who, who got fired. This is serious shit here, folks. You know, we, we talk about how the United States is the world leader and how, you know, the world should
- [31:07]
C
look up to the United States.
- [31:08]
B
We can't even keep our own backyard cleaned up. So it's time that we focus on cleaning up our own backyard before we try and tell other People what they should be doing and we certainly shouldn't be dropping any more bombs of freedom on anyone anytime soon. We have a lot of looking in the mirror and some self reflecting to do in this country and we need to realize that people that we send to Washington D.C. are not working for us. And most, most times they're working against us. And we see it here. This will just go by the wayside. Nobody will be in trouble and they'll write it off as just a glitch. There'll never be any further investigation. Congress won't care, the Senate won't care and it'll be just forgotten by these people because at the end of the day they don't care about any of this. This is not something that they care about. If any of them care, if they would have stopped this guy a very long time ago, but they didn't care. Nobody cared. Not the FBI, not the prosecutors, nobody. This man was able to do whatever he wanted for all of these years. And people like Acosta and his bosses get away with bullshit like this. Oh, the inbox is missing. We can't provide that for you. Let me or you try that. Say the government's coming after us in an investigation. Let us try that bullshit.
- [32:32]
C
Oh yeah, well I, I, I lost that stuff.
- [32:34]
B
You know, we don't have it for you. I'm sure that would go over real well. Our article is from the Daily News. The headline, alex Acosta's email inbox during critical period of Jeffrey Epstein case Missing author Steven Rex Brown. Nearly a year of emails and Alex Acosta's email inbox while he oversaw the case against Jeffrey Epstein are missing, the Justice Department has revealed to the survivor's lawyers during a meeting on Thursday. Imagine being the person that has to deliver that news. Talk about showing up and having to break the bad news to the survivors lawyers that the federal government is inept. Once again we have to tell you guys, sorry, we, we screwed the pooch here. We really, we don't know what we're doing. Obviously the emails in the EBOT inbox back gone. Sorry, that's a glitch. We don't know what happened to those. But the good news is federal officials attributed the gap from May 26, 2007 to, to April 2, 2008 to a technical glitch that wasn't limited to the former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida, two sources familiar with the Justice Department review of Epstein's sweetheart deal told the Daily News. And there it is.
- [34:03]
C
Well, it wasn't just him so come on, folks, all right?
- [34:06]
B
Don't be crazy. Don't be a conspiracy theorist. Just suck down this bullshit that we're feeding you. It's like they want you to just obey, don't question anything. Don't have any kind of critical thought or critical. Critical thinking. They just want you to just fall in line, listen to what they have to say, and buy into the narrative.
- [34:33]
C
Meanwhile,
- [34:36]
B
they have done nothing to prove their worthiness of us just believing them.
- [34:42]
C
Not at this point.
- [34:42]
B
Not after everything we have seen. And I don't just mean the Jeffrey Epstein case, folks. Look at the way these people conduct themselves. Look at the absolute, absolute shit show that the Department of Just Us is. It is a shame. A dumpster fire, a clown show. You insert whatever kind of derogatory comment you want here, and it would be fitting. Bill Barr is a failure. His predecessor was a failure. And all of them before them were failures as well. The whole entire lot of them. It's just completely corrupt. And it's unacceptable that it could be that the Department of Justice could be mismanaged in such a way. It has such an overreaching effect on all of our lives and the ineptitude shown time and time again. Administration after administration is unacceptable. And somebody somewhere in our government has to. Has to put a stop to it. There has to be accountability for this shit. No chain of custody. Nobody got in trouble for the video missing from Jeffrey Epstein's alleged suicide attempt the first time around. No chain of custody issues whatsoever there here. Emails go missing, no big deal. We'll just keep it moving and blame
- [36:08]
C
it on a glitch.
- [36:09]
B
You're a conspiracy theorist for asking questions, though. The review made public Thursday found that Acosta exercised poor judgment but committed no misconduct when he allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges rather than face a federal case. The serial pervert served 13 months in Palm Beach County Jail despite evidence he ran an underage sex trafficking scheme. And now, mind you, the deal that was cut between Acosta, all the other attorneys involved, and Epstein's lawyers, and let's not forget the Justice Department, all of
- [36:52]
C
those emails in that inbox for that
- [36:53]
B
year, that period of a year just magically disappeared.
- [36:58]
C
I mean, it's not like, you know,
- [37:00]
B
there was an internal investigation and by the, you know, Department of Justice or anything looking into this stuff. It's not like there were other people who were interested in this stuff. It's just very convenient that the emails go missing, huh? Very convenient indeed. Epstein hanged himself last year in a Manhattan federal jail, allegedly after Being slapped with new sex trafficking charges. Investigators with the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility said they were able to reconstruct much of Acosta's inbox by examining his scent folder as well as other staffers emails.
- [37:41]
C
Are we.
- [37:41]
B
So we're supposed to believe this? Honestly, folks, real, real talk here. Do any of you believe this narrative that they're spinning to us? Because I. I just can't. I can't buy into it. I, believe me, I wish it was this cut and dry. I wish we.
- [37:57]
C
I didn't have to spend all this
- [37:59]
B
time every day talking about this, this, this case. I wish these people would just do their job. I wish they would have done their job and we could have had a trial and, and all of this could have been sorted out. But no, they have to play their games. They have to be not transparent. They have to f around. Well, the bullshit's over. People are done with the nonsense. All right? It is time for accountability. It is no longer time for excuses. And if these people are not held accountable, this will continue to go on, and we will continue to see people like Jeffrey Epstein pop up in our society. Because when there's no repercussions, then why would these people not conduct themselves in the same manner? The email gap came during a critical period in the Florida Epstein case, when the sex offenders powerhouse legal team aggressively negotiated with Acosta and his prosecutors. Epstein's non prosecution agreement with Acosta's office, which covered named and unnamed co conspirators, was executed in September 2007, an unprecedented deal in Justice Department history, officials said during the meeting, according to attendees.
- [39:15]
C
So in all the deals the Justice
- [39:18]
B
Department has ever cut, all the people that have come through those doors, all of the people that have been served federal warrants, nobody ever has had a deal quite like Jeffrey Epstein's. But yet. You mean to tell me I should just accept all of the coincidences around this, this case, around Jeffrey Epstein? That's what you're telling me? I am not buying it, okay? This guy gets the greatest deal in the history of great deals, and nobody
- [39:49]
C
gets held accountable for that.
- [39:51]
B
The Department of Justice, the Inspector General
- [39:55]
C
couldn't come up with something, couldn't slap
- [39:57]
B
sanctions on any of these lawyers who
- [39:59]
C
were involved in this?
- [40:00]
B
Of course not, because it's always about protect our own, cover your ass. Nah, we can't make the Justice Department look bad. So we'll say it was just an error in judgment and a glitch. In October 2007, Acosta had an unusual breakfast meeting at a Miami hotel with Epstein's lawyer, Jay Lefkowitz. Now remember, Jay Lefkowitz is also the man who, who told us that Epstein made an obscene amount of money donation to the Clintons for their Clinton Global Initiative. So this is someone who's really locked in with Jeffrey Epstein. Jay Lefkowitz was a huge part of that team. Him and Dershowitz were pretty much the front men, the guys that were really running the show. So Lefkowitz was really locked in. He knows the deal. He had this meeting with Acosta and they were not talking about their families, they were obviously talking about this case. The gap was also just revealed Thursday despite more than 10 years of litigation over prosecutors handling of the case. All these years and we've never heard anything about that. It took some ass internal investigation and what's. That's the bone they're going to throw us that the emails were missing.
- [41:24]
C
And they wonder why there are all
- [41:26]
B
these questions about this. They wonder why people are making documentaries about this. They wonder why nobody trusts the department of just us anymore. Yesterday we were told that OPR was unable to recover months of emails from Alex Acosta, who was the U.S. attorney and the person ultimately in charge of this deal. That raises numerous questions about what the defense attorneys were telling Mr. Acosta and why he continually exercised influence to give a sweeter and sweeter deal for Epstein, said Epstein's survivor's attorney, Paul Cassell. We intend to, to pursue the this issue through all possible venues to determine why these emails were missing and why we were never told about it until yesterday. Good on you, Mr. Cassel. And I hope you guys do go hard in the paint over this because the more I think about it, the more enraging it is to me. Like I said, I didn't even plan on doing a daily drop tonight. I had other things going on already. I was doing other things and I'm sitting here and I'm like, you know what? This shit can't wait till the morning. This is such a an egregious move by the Department of Justice and I really hope the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals is watching and I hope they take this into account and I hope that they understand that they're literally the last line of transparency and the last line of defense of some semblance of justice truly occurring. Because that non prosecution agreement has to go. It has to go. And if I was the lawyers for the survivors and the 11th Circuit Court didn't rule in my favor, I would take this all the way to the Supreme Court if I had to. It's that important, it's that serious and it has that kind of, those kind of long reaching ramifications that not only on this case but on the nation as a whole. We have to do some soul searching, folks. Who do we want to be? The email gap is further fodder for conspiracy theories or more evidence that there's no conspiracy theory here. This, this is obviously some sort of real screw up, okay? There's something really disgustingly weird going on here, okay? Nobody's talking about no sasquatches. Nobody's talking about little green men. Nobody's talking about anything like that, okay? We're talking about an absolute failure by the Department of Justice that is not explained away by the excuses that they're giving us. And if you're willing to accept that, that narrative from them, that basic explanation about what occurred, then more power to you. I'm not here to tell anybody how to think. Me personally though, I am not accepting that bullshit. Sorry. I need more answers. All right? I need proof at this point. The government has done nothing but lie for 10 years. They know about these emails missing and they don't tell nobody about it. They don't tell the lawyers about it for the survivors.
- [44:34]
C
Why not?
- [44:35]
B
What else is the government hiding? So I'm guessing it's going to have to come down to a flurry of Freedom of Information act suits to try and get some information from these scumbags like Angela Clemente did. It's a sad world, folks, when the people who are in place to protect us do everything in their power to avoid bringing people like Epstein and his associates to justice.
- [45:07]
C
The email gap. Excuse me.
- [45:09]
B
I am a firm believer that there are no coincidences. Epstein survivors lawyer Jack Scarola said there
- [45:16]
C
are a lot of strange things that
- [45:17]
B
went on with regards to this case. A lot of questions that remain unanswered and not yet adequately investigated. That's from the lawyer himself. So I guess he's a conspiracy theorist too, right? Or maybe that's something they like to throw around to try and make it seem like there's nothing here. But folks, there's a lot here, like Mr. Scarola says, there is a lot of unanswered questions that have not yet been adequately investigated. And that's a damn shame. The legacy media has had decades to do this and they failed, like at everything else they get involved with, for the most part, their failures. So the investigation continues, the digging continues, the search for answers continues, and ultimately the goal is justice. If you like to contact me. You can do that@bobby capuchirotonmail.com. that's B O B B Y C A P U C c I@protonmail.com. you can also find me on Twitter at bo-b y/capucci. All of the links that go with this episode can be found in the description box. All right, everybody, I'll be back tomorrow morning and we'll see what we see then.
- [46:47]
A
Just call.