Transcript
A (0:00)
With Vrbill's last minute deals, you can save over $50 on your spring getaway. So whether it's a mountain escape city break or a week at the beach, there's still time to get great discounts. Book your next day now. Average savings $72. Select homes only support is available 24. 7 with VRBoCare. We're here day or night, ready whenever you need help because a great trip so starts with the right support.
B (0:30)
Up everyone and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. One of the most fascinating parts of this whole entire case is Jeffrey Epstein's money. Where did he get all of this money? How did he accrue such a fortune? And what was he doing offshore with all of this money? And furthermore, where is all of this money now? We have heard that the estate was worth, what, $640 million roughly. Do you really believe that's all this man had? That was all the money that Jeffrey Epstein had squirreled away in all of these years. Considering that Leon Black himself had given Jeffrey Epstein $158 million, it would lead me to believe that a guy like Epstein, who was making all of these financial moves is not just going to sit on his dough. He's going to invest that money, he's going to launder that money and he's going to use that money to keep his criminal empire going. Now the question is, how much liability do these banks have for funding people like Jeffrey Epstein or cartels or other criminal organizations? We've seen these banks get absolutely smacked with lawsuits, we've seen them get killed with fines, but nobody ever goes to prison. How is it that these people that are running around in these hallways of power in the financial sector are always immune to prosecution? If it's a well known fact that a bank like Deutsche bank was in bed with Epstein and facilitated his whole entire operation, then doesn't that lead you to think that somebody might be held responsible over there? You know, the bank itself isn't a living and breathing entity. There is actually, you know, people who work for this bank who are giving the okay for these transactions, who are, you know, involved in all of it. But yet we don't hear anything about them facing any consequences. What happens is there's a shuffling of the deck. Maybe one of them leaves the current company, but they always land on their feet and they always fall out of the plane with a golden parachute. Today we have an article from 2019 talking about Jeffrey Epstein, his tainted money, and Deutsche Bank. This article is from the Observer. Headline, Jeffrey Epstein borrowed tainted money from Deutsche bank says former mentor the origins of Jeffrey Epstein's financial empire remains a mystery even to billionaires. This article was authored by Davis Richardson and it was published on 9th July 2019. The Origins of Jeffrey Epstein's financial empire remain a mystery to even billionaires. But the investor's former Wall street mentor has one theory about how Epstein amassed his fortune. Fraud. That really is the biggest and most likeliest circumstance, right? That he enriched himself by using means of fraud. He didn't have a whole Rolodex of clients, at least that we knew about. So how is he getting this money? My guess is all kinds of wire fraud, all kinds of, you know, IPOs, all kinds of grimy ass stock trades. You name it, he was in on it. Because for all of his faults, Epstein certainly was somebody who knew how to manipulate Wall street and how to play this offshore game. In a phone interview with Observer, Steve Hoffenberg alleged Epstein participated in a Ponzi scheme. The two ran together in the 80s before using the ill gotten gains to launch his investment company with the help of financial loans from Deutsche Bank. Now in the real world, when you use ill gotten gains to start a company or a business, well, that company or business gets seized by the federal government. And it's very suspicious to me that none of these companies that Epstein set up, Liquid Limited or any of these other companies, none of them were seized by the federal government. Why not? Why didn't the government go for the gusto and chase down all of these financial ties? You mean to tell me there were no digital receipts that tied Epstein to any of these other well placed bankers or people in the financial sector who might have, you know, facilitated his bullshit? Of course there are. That's why we didn't see it. And that's why we're still here talking about this so many years later, folks. It's a very simplistic financial fraud that he concealed from everybody that gave him tainted money, said Hoffenberg. He never told anybody, and I literally mean anybody that gave him any money since he left Towers that he was part of Towers. And that's a securities fraud. Because when you take money from people, you have to tell them your history, and that's a fact. If you're gonna work as a financial broker or somebody on Wall street, you have to be transparent. And if you have had issues with the SEC or other agencies in the past, you have to be upfront about that. So basically, Epstein was committing wire and security fraud this whole entire time, and he was able to do so now the going theory is he was able to do so because he had turned informant for the federal government. Now there is also the, the thought pattern that he was also an asset for intelligence. And I find that both of those theories track. One thing's for sure, he certainly did work for the government as an informant. That's. It's not even debatable. Now the other stuff, we don't really have rock solid proof, right? But we do know from circumstantial evidence and from people who have been been around Epstein, people who say they have worked with Epstein, that he certainly was somebody who was connected to the intelligence apparatus as well. So I have always said, and I maintain this position to this day, that Epstein certainly was an asset. As far as. Was he Mossad or CIA? I don't think so, as, you know, a real spy? I don't think that. But I do think he was engaging in this operation to build profiles and build different sorts of information, data banks, so that he could use those profiles and use that information to further his own position, to build his own stock. Hoffenberg oversaw Towers Financial, but was sentenced to 20 years in jail in 1997 for defrauding clients out of $450 million. Although Epstein was never charged in the case, a lawsuit filed last year by former Towers investors lists the financier pedophile as an uncharged co conspirator and allegedly and alleges he knowingly and intentionally utilized funds from fraudulence and diverted those funds he obtained from the massive Ponzi scheme for his own personal use to support a lavish lifestyle. And the reason he got off on all of this is because he worked as an informant for the government, remember? Do you really listen to who we're talking about here, folks? Okay? And I don't mean Epstein. I'm talking about the government. When does the government let anyone off the hook? Never, unless you give something to them in return. And that's what happened here. Epstein was working as an informant as far as in the financial sector, and he, you know, built some relationships with whoever his handler was. I'd really love to see who was handling Jeffrey Epstein. That would really answer some questions honestly. And the biggest fear I have, folks, is that we never really truly get to the bottom of all of this because nobody's going to be willing to come forward. Maybe we'll have some sort of FBI agent at some point who is like terminally ill or something and decides they have to get this weight off their chest, but I just have no confidence in ever learning the real story, at least the official version of it, because they've shown no interest in giving it to us all of these years. Why would that change now? If Jeffrey Epstein was materially involved in the management of Towers Financial as his former associate Stephen Hoffenberg has alleged, or he substantially assisted and had knowledge of the Ponzi scheme through various corporate transactions with Towers Financial, then he would be subject to liability for that Ponzi and and further may have committed securities fraud on his future clients by not disclosing his prior involvement. Jeff Son, a securities attorney and founder of San Law Group, told Observer. The problem I see is that hoffenberg waited some 20 years to come forward with these new allegations and he may have had, he may have reduced his 18 year sentence by implicating Epstein in the Ponzi scheme back in 94, but, but didn't do so well. A lot of that has to do with Epstein playing ball with the feds at the time. So Epstein was already playing ball. Remember, Epstein had a relationship with these guys from his time with Bear Stearns. Hoffenberg said he did not tell prosecutors
