
After Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from a minor became public, one of the most controversial aspects of his continued influence was how he managed to maintain deep ties to elite academic institutions — particularly Harvard...
Loading summary
A
Harvard and Jeffrey Epstein. Now, everybody listening to this podcast, everybody following this case knows for a fact that Jeffrey Epstein had a very, very comfortable and cozy relationship with many, many scientists. And a good portion of those scientists and academics were based on at Harvard. Now, the other day, when the 11th Court, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals made their ruling, I said right away, why is there a judge from Harvard overseeing this ruling? Now, even if Judge Newsom is completely not tainted and he's unbiased and all of that jazz, it's about optics. Don't these people understand that optics matter? There should have been a different judge who sat on that panel, not somebody with ties to Harvard, not somebody who could have had ties to any of these people that Epstein was funding. It's just, it's, it's ridiculous on its face that a judge from Harvard would be tasked to sit on the three judge panel. You're telling me there's not another judge on that panel that could have, that could have sat for that hearing? Harvard is an absolute den of scum and villainy in my opinion. These people, horrendous. And the way that they covered up their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein for so long is enough to make your head spin. Anybody who's sending their kid to Harvard at this point, I don't even know what to tell you. Talk about a waste of money. Plenty of better universities to send your children at this point. These, these so called higher education institutions, these Ivy League schools are the absolute worst, in my opinion. The absolute worst. And we see it time and time again when we hear stories like this and we hear about how Jeffrey Epstein was associated with all of these high profile universities and he had an office at Harvard and he was given this one money and he was donating money to this program and he was dropping off Gucci bags full of dough to this one. You know, come on, enough is enough already. And these are the same institutions that will stand atop their ivory towers and scream down at the rest of us about how we should live our lives. The party's over for them as well. The academics are on notice. We've been talking about the academics on this podcast from the jump. These people are the kind of folks that are usually sliding underneath the spotlight. But what we've learned in this case is that these academics are just as sick as their buddies in the financial sector, it seems. So let's jump into this article by the Daily Mail and see what they have to say. This article is from the Daily Mail. The author is Francis Mulraney. Headline, Harvard Math professor is placed on leave for giving Jeffrey Epstein his own office on campus and allowing the school's website to be used to burnish the pedophile's reputation after his 2008 conviction review finds. Now, again, remember, this is after his first conviction, folks, okay? We're not talking about previously where they can make pretend and at least try and make the case. Well, we didn't know he hadn't been arrested, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. No, this is after the fact that this is how corrupt people are when it comes to money. They don't care who's going to fund their science or who is giving them an endowment, as long as they're getting the money, as long as their projects moving forward. To hell with what the person has done previously in their lives. Who cares if they're a child molester, a sex trafficker? Nah, no big deal. Give me some of your money. And then these people are shocked when it comes out and there's an uproar and the public is enraged. I don't. I don't understand what planet these people think they live on, but they're certainly not living on planet Earth. They have a completely separate reality from the rest of us, and that's where they live. And within their reality, all of their actions make sense. Meanwhile, any civilized person who's taking a look at their actions knows that. That these people are sick and twisted. A Harvard math professor was placed on administrative leave Friday after a damning new report claimed he had continued to maintain an office on campus for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein even after the deceased financier's pedophile's 2008 sex crimes conviction. Martin Nowak, the lead on Harvard's Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, provided Epstein with a campus key card which allowed him to visit more than 40 times between 2010 and 2018, the report states. Now imagine you're a parent and you send your kid to Harvard thinking they're going to get this great education. They're going to be, you know, 10 steps ahead of everybody else who didn't go to Harvard, etc. Etc. And they show up and they have Martin Nowak as one of their professors. Well, because they have Martin Nowak as one of their professors, they're now exposed to Jeffrey Epstein as a parent. Do you think you would be comfortable with that? I know I certainly wouldn't be. A convicted sex offender having an office on the Harvard campus, running around with a bunch of girls that are, you know, 18, 19 years old. This is a good idea. And for the Harvard Brass to act like they had no idea. That's ridiculous. There needs to be a purging of the board at Harvard. The same way the New York Academy of Art needs to be purged. These people are sick. A room in the department was established as Jeffrey's office in Epstein, who died by apparent suicide in Manhattan jail in 2019. Even had his own Harvard phone line again. So for the higher ups to know, to act like they didn't know what was going on. It's a joke. Okay, so who set up the phone line? The IT department. So the IT director didn't know what was going on? The IT director didn't kick that up. These investigations are a bunch of bs, all right? These investigations, we never see the people in charge get in trouble. With these internal investigations. What we see is the low hanging fruit. The easy person to act is who they go after. Never the CEO, never the trustees, none of that shit. It's always the professor. Like it's just the professor's fault. Now, don't get me wrong. Noak should shoulder a majority of the blame for bringing Epstein Epstein around. But what about his bosses? Is there no responsibility for those who are overseeing the department? A report added that Nowak also signed off on false flattering statements about Epstein for the school's website as the deceased financier Pedophi attempted to rehabilitate his Image after his 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from an underage girl. And again, how many times do we talk about enablers on the podcast? We have different rings of people who helped Jeffrey Epstein do what he did. And Nowak is definitely an enabler. He helped to rehabilitate his image. He gave him an office on Harvard. He gave him the credibility of Jeffrey Epstein, saying, well, I'm invited back to Harvard. Why won't you invite me to your party? If they let me at Harvard. I mean, how bad can I be? And you see, this is the problem with all of the enablers. And this is why all of the enablers must be called out. Because without their actions, without them enabling Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein would have been. No way Epstein would have been able to been active the way he was and conduct business the way he did. The professor's alleged actions came after the then Harvard president had barred the school from accepting any further donations from Epstein in 2008. So they don't have any control over what's going on is what they're saying. The president of the board had. Has no, no say on. On who has an office at Harvard or how Their professors conduct themselves or who they associate with? What are you trying to say here? Are you trying to say that Harvard, there's, there's no leadership structure and everybody just does what they want? Because for the last 11 years, nobody said about this. Now all of a sudden it's a big problem, huh? Now all of a sudden Harvard cares? You're not fooling me, Harvard. You don't care. It's all about optics at this point. It's all about saving face. You never cared about the survivors and you still don't care about the survivors. Epstein pumped 9.2 million in donations into the university between 1998 and 2007, according to the month long investigation carried out by Harvard's general counsel and an outside law firm. Again, Harvard's general counsel. So you're telling me that the internal lawyer for Harvard is going to give this a look and give it a real unbiased look and not care if Harvard leaves with a black eye? Yeah. Okay. Who's paying his salary, folks? That's right, Harvard. Do you really think this man is going to do a pristine job or this woman is going to do a pristine job of looking into this case and unfurling all of the facts as they are, or are they going to hide a couple of things, put something in their pocket? We'll report this, but we won't report that. Now, I'm not saying that's what happened because I don't know. What I am saying though is I do not believe for a second that we can believe that a place like Harvard or Yale or any of these corporations is going to be transparent when they're investigating themselves. He was known for using his money to gain access to academics professing an interest in science. And he earned a reputation for funding some of America's most prestigious institutions, such as MIT and Harvard. Yeah, we know that. And it wasn't just those institutions either. There were a lot of state universities that he was involved with. We know that at Arizona State with Lawrence Krauss, he had involvement there as well as we touched on recently. So it's not just the most prestigious institutions. It's any institution where Jeffrey Epstein feels like he felt like he could get a foothold and benefit from a relationship with a university. In return, Epstein was welcomed onto campuses and given the opportunity to meet with faculty. He would also invite academics to his private Caribbean island. Oh, I'm sure he would. Because as you all know, in my opinion, or all of these academics for the most part, are just as sick as his Political buddies. You're telling me all of these nerds, and that's what these academics are, folks, make no mistake that all of these nerds who never got girls in high school, probably never got girls in college, get invited to Jeffrey Epstein's island. And there's all these beautiful girls running around. And Epstein says, you can, you know, the island is yours. You're telling me that these dudes weren't involved? They didn't know what was going on. They didn't know that there was a bunch of young girls running around this island? Give me a break. Give me a break. And we are. We already know about guys like Minsky. We already know what Virginia Roberts has said about Marvin Minsky. And to think that any of these other academics or scientists weren't partaking as well. I don't believe that. In my opinion, there's zero chance that that was occurring. The report published Friday expanded on what was already known about Epstein's link with Harvard, claiming that his presence on campus continued even after the university's then president, Drew Gilpin Faust, barred any more donations from the pedophile. About $200,000 of the funding provided by Epstein before the cutoff in 2008 remains unspent, the school said, and will be given to groups that support victims of sexual violence. And that's always their go to, right? It's gonna be given to groups that support sexual violence or human trafficking. Who are these groups? All right, why, why don't all of these, these. These people who accepted money from Jeffrey Epstein get in contact with the lawyers of the. The survivors and try and coordinate with them to see where this money should go. Maybe the survivors have a charity that this money should be donated to, you know, the people directly affected by your decisions at Harvard. Maybe you should try and help those people out. The report found that while Harvard's top leaders cut ties with Epstein in 2008, he maintained close ties with Novak, with Nowak, a math professor and director of the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, a research center created in 2003 with six and a half million dollars from Epst Epstein. So it wasn't just a funded project. Okay, folks, he created the division. He put up six and a half million dollars in seed money to create the division at Harvard. Now, you mean to tell me that non of the presidents, none of the trustees, none of the board members knew who Jeffrey Epstein was or what he was up to? I know this was in 2003, but come on. The rumors were already swirling. And yet Harvard had no problem sliding right into Bed with this serpent. It's. It's one of those cases where it's just. You look at it and you say to yourself, how is it even possible that something like this could even occur? I mean, it's just. It's just crazy, folks. It is just crazy as hell. Noak gave Epstein an office at the program's building in Harvard Square. The Review found and circumvented campus security rules to grant the financier pedophile a key card and unlimited access to the facility. Now, we know from firsthand accounts from Maria Farmer and others that Ghislaine Maxwell used to love to cruise places like Central park looking for nubiles. Now, you mean to tell me that a campus like Harvard wouldn't be prime hunting ground for Jeffrey Epstein and his stooges to try and lure girls into his atmosphere with these. These promises and all of these pipe dreams that he loved to pass out? It's a very uncomfortable thought to think that a sexual predator and a man like Jeffrey Epstein had access to a campus like Harvard with his own office. It's really disturbing to think about. Epstein frequently visited Office 610, which was known as Jeffries office, and met with scholars to hear about their work, the Review found. He brought his own rug and hung his own photos on the wall. And none of the administrators knew, huh? None of the administrators ever ventured down to this wing of the school. None of the board members ever went and checked in on what Mr. Nowak was up to, wasn't important or something, or, you know, you guys just sit in your ivory towered office all day drinking spritzers and eating caviar. The hell is going on over there? Nowak argued that the office was Epstein's in name only, the report says, but others in the building said it was commonly known to be reserved for the pedophile. So all those people that said it was commonly reserved for Epstein, where were you outing this? Why were you quiet? Why were you being complicit? I have news for you. Anywhere I'm at, somebody like Jeffrey Epstein walks in the building, there's gonna be a few words that tumble out of my mouth for these people just to sit by and let this man have an office within their wing of the campus. It's gross. We do not take this step lightly, but the seriousness of the matter leads us to believe it is not appropriate for Professor Nowak to continue in his role, wrote Claudine Gay, dean of Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences, of the decision to place Nowak on leave you should all be placed on leave. If I had a kid at Harvard, I'd be going crazy right now. I would be at the campus demanding that people are fired. It's not just the professor's fault. It's definitely a majority of the blame falls on his shoulders. But there's no institutional control, so how can we believe that this isn't still going on or won't go on in the future when Harvard refuses to take the reins and have some sort of institutional control over what's going on within its building buildings? Harvard's report urges the university to develop clearer procedures for reviewing potentially controversial gifts and for enforcing bans on certain donors. Bacow said he has instructed top officials to implement the suggestions as soon as possible. About two decades too late. All of a sudden, now it's a big deal because you're in the media. All of a sudden, because you're tied to Jeffrey Epstein, you're gonna institute all of these new steps. A place like Harvard should have all of their ducks in a row from the jump. It shouldn't need outside pressure from content creators, legacy media, and survivors to do the right thing. A place like Harvard, where they're basically teaching and educating the leaders of tomorrow, should have, at the very least, a bit of a moral compass, in my opinion. We will always do our best to improve, Bacow said in a campus message on Friday. The report issued today describes principled decision making, but also reveals institutional and individual shortcomings that must be addressed, not only for the sake of the university, but also in recognition of the courageous individuals who sought to bring Epstein to justice. So now all of a sudden, he's talking about, oh, yeah, and I want to make sure that I let everybody know that the survivors are brave. Well, that's nice. Lip service is nice and all, but what are you doing for the survivors? What are you do.
B
Have you.
A
Have you reached out to them as a university to apologize? At the very least, you think that would be a step that should be taken, right? I know if I was in charge of this university, I'd be on the phone with every single one of these gals that has come forward with a claim against Epstein. And. And I'd be apologizing for the. The university's role in enabling Jeffrey Epstein's behavior, because this is just. This is a. This is outrageous. Epstein killed. Killed himself in his New York City prison cell, allegedly in August after he was arrested on sex trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty to sexually abusing girls as young as 14 and young women in New York and Florida in the early 2000s. In lawsuits, women say the abuse spanned decades. Among other allegations against Nowak, the report alleged that he allowed his program's website to be used to burnish Epstein's reputation after his 2008 conviction. Boy, isn't that nice? Talk about enabling Jeffrey Epstein. This Martin Nowak character. Top notch enabler. Imagine a Harvard professor vouching for you amongst his buddies and his friends. And hey, if Noak says he's cool, he must be cool, right? In reality, Nowak was just another one of Jeffrey Epstein's stooges, it looks like. And another one that didn't care a lick about Epstein's crimes. He only cared how deep he could get his hand into Jeffrey Epstein's pocket. In 2013, at the request of Epstein's publicist, Nowak agreed to post links to the to the pedophile's websites, which had flattering descriptions of Epstein and made false claims about his levels of giving to Harvard. The review found. Oh, yeah, I'm sure they did. They had to throw that in there, right? False claims of giving. Yeah, I think we need a second look at that. A more stringent look at that. Nowak is also accused of devoting a page on the program's website to Epstein, also at the request of the financier's publicist. Pedophiles publicist, you mean. There's no evidence that Harvard's top officials knew about the postings? The report says Epstein's page on the website was removed in 2014 after Harvard received complaints from a sexual assault survivors group. The report concludes that Harvard's senior leaders acted appropriately in their dealings with Epstein. Of course it does. Has there ever been one of these internal reports that really put the management structure on blast? Has there ever been one of these reports that really did the right thing and outed all of of the rats at the top? No, never does. Always the low hanging fruit, just like the prison guards. Harvard as an institution is no different from the corrupt Department of Justice. Sorry, folks, just the facts. Former president Drew Foss decided to bar donations from Epstein after his conviction, the review says. And a university Dean rejected a 2013 request from some faculty to reconsider the decision, saying it would be inconsistent with Harvard's values. Values. Okay, some faculty. Let's get the names of those faculty members that thought it was a good idea after Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of his crimes to take donations from him. Can we have their names, Please put their names out so we can discuss them and their disgusting behavior. But Some faculty enjoyed close ties with Epstein, the report says. A number. Just a number. No names. No specific number. Nothing. Faculty members visited Epstein at his homes in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Again, this is. I want names, all right? The report needs to name all of the professors involved so we can go through them one by one and figure out what their role was in the Epstein organization. Because obviously that's not a job that the prosecutors want to do. It's not a job that the legacy media in America wants to do. They leave it up to the Daily Mail to do the right thing. So can we get those names so that we can get busy building the blueprint? Some said they visited him in jail or took trips on his planes. The visits were done in a personal capacity, the report said, and do not appear to violate Harvard rules. Yeah, I don't care if it's personal, professional, whatever it may be. If you're. You're one of my employees and you think it's a good idea to go hang out with Jeffrey Epstein, and in turn, that's going to cause my business problems, well, I got news for you. You're out on your ass. You're fired. All right? A, because it's bad business, and B, because I don't want to be associated with somebody hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein. Yet these faculty members, unnamed, by the way, at Harvard, have no. Have no problem. In fact, they're writing to the administration saying that they should be able to accept donations from this man. What a bunch of sick, disgusting bastards. In total, Epstein made more than 20 donations to Harvard, the largest of which was the $6.5 million to NOAC's research group. Smaller donations supported faculty research in psychology, economics, art, and education. Although his gifts were blocked after 2008, the report found that Harvard accepted $736,000 between his arrest and conviction. So while Jeffrey Epstein was on trial and waiting to be convicted, Harvard was still accepting donations from him. In their infinite wisdom, as one of the top tier universities in the world, they couldn't figure out that taking money from Jeffrey Epstein was a bad idea. Yet we're gonna listen to these guys about geopolitical issues or about health issues or about economics issues. Sorry. Harvard is a shit school, in my opinion, okay? That's right. I said it's a shit school. Most went to Harvard's Medical School, while 150,000 went to its Faculty of Arts and Sciences. We all know how he loves the arts programs, right? He loves naive art students. He loves naive artists. Jeffrey Epstein was a Sick and disgusting bastard. And Harvard enabled his behavior. Point blank period. Harvard President Lawrence Bacow called for the review in September 2019amid public outcry over the university's relationship with Epstein. Other schools have faced similar scrutiny, including nearby Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which revealed in January that Epstein donated $750,000 and visited the campus at least nine times after his conviction. The former director of MIT's famed Media Lab, Joy Ito, resigned last year amid uproar over his ties to Epstein. He issued a public apology and vowed to raise money for victims of trafficking. That's what they all say when they get busted, right? Oh, well, I'm sorry that I took part in hurting the survivors of Epstein. But what I'm gonna do now is I'm gonna raise money for victims of trafficking. That's what I'm gonna do. Because that makes everything better to these people. Money makes the world go round. They have no conscience. They have no moral compass. And they do not care about me, you, or your children. Get it through your heads, folks. These people do not care. We're up against some of the most evil people in the history of the world. And all of these enablers, all of these people that vouched for Jeffrey Epstein, all of these people that were in his inner circle, all of these people that he used to refurbish his image, all of you are disgusting ass excuses for human beings. And as the information continues to roll out and the names continue to come into the light, we will continue to talk about all of the people who are involved with Jeffrey Epstein and his criminal organization until they all face justice. If you'd like to contact me, you could do that@bobby capuchirotonmail.com that's B O B B Y C A P U C C I. @protonmail.com Our article today is from the
B
sun and the headline, jeffrey Epstein. Excuse me. Hidden haunt. Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell use secret woodland lair and boarding school grounds to target pupils. Author Christy Cooney. And we've seen this, right? We've seen Jeffrey Epstein have an office on Harvard, at Harvard. I mean, who knows where else he had an office. They were donating money to a Lithuanian ballet. Donating money here, donating money to this troupe, that troupe, this theater group, anywhere where there were young teenage girls. Jeffrey Epstein was donating money. Pretty obvious at this point. The late financier, pedophile was a donor to the Interlocutor center for the Arts in Michigan and in 1994 provided funds for the Jeffrey Epstein Scholarship Lodge within its grounds. And we know that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were involved up in Michigan, and that there is the allegations from the girl who went to Interlochen. So how in the hell was this guy able to have this lodge? Why would this school take the money, Take money from this man? And another question is, even though this money was taken previously, you know, years ago, have they donated this money to a charity? Have they reached out to the survivors and said, hey, look, we want to. We want to put this money to good use that we got from Jeffrey Epstein. Where should we park it? No, none of that happens. What they do is they just try and donate the money wherever they decide they want to donate it, and they don't look for any input from the survivors or people who might have been affected by this. And I think that's a bunch of bullshit. I think all of these companies, all of these organizations that received money from Epstein or his cronies, well, that money should have to be redirected to some sort of charity that has to do with Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. The center is situated on 12 on a 1200 acre campus in the state's northwest and attracts pupils from around the world to study music, theater, and arts. You know, this would be the perfect place for somebody like Jeffrey Epstein, huh? Bunch of young kids looking to become musicians or whatever, whatever have you from this school. And Jeffrey Epstein shows up as a patron, has a whole bunch of money, has all these contacts, knows all these people in, you know, all these different symphonies and orchestras and all these different powerful organizations around the world. And he shows up and decides, hey, I'm gonna be your patron. I'm gonna throw out some dough for you to, you know, chase your dreams. Oh, your mom needs some money. Oh, I'll take care of her, too. And he used that money as a vehicle always to weasel his way into these people's lives and abuse these children. Epstein, who killed himself last year, allegedly while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, was a donor to the school between 1990 and 2003, and also held events for its alumni at his New York mansion. Well, isn't that sweet? Isn't that sweet? How about the alumni from Interlochen all come on down to my house of horrors and we have a dildo party in the bedroom? Really? Who would go to Jeffrey Epstein's mansion and not walk out of that place absolutely disgusted, or at the very least, wondering what the hell sort of Hollywood horror house you just entered? I mean, chess pieces carved into the likeness of his Employees, the eyeball wall, Bill Clinton in a dress. I mean, come on, folks, who the hell would go to this guy's house and not think something was amiss? And donating from 1990 to all the way to 2003. 13 years. I wonder how much money Jeffrey Epstein poured into Interlocan. And I wonder how many young girls were abused in this facility or via this facility. The terms under which he funded the lodge are reported to have included an agreement that he could stay there for up to two weeks of each year. Why would Jeffrey Epstein need to do that? Why would he need to stay on this campus? Why would these people allow that? A grown ass man who wants to stay on this campus full of kids. Well, that doesn't sit well with me. I don't understand why that would even occur. I don't understand how anybody could look at that proposal and be like, yeah, this is a good idea. Let's check off on this and let this gross ass old man come to the campus and just, you know, stay here for two weeks. For what reason would he need to stay there for two weeks? We're talking about a man who is so damn rich that he could fly on it, fly in on his chopper, hang out for the day, and then fly to whatever hotel he wants. He needs to stay on this campus. No, he doesn't need to stay on this campus. His sick proclivities called for it. His disgusting mind wanted him to stay on this campus. He should not have ever been allowed to have access to. To these kids. His estate is now being used for. Is now being sued for £19 million by one woman known as Jane Doe, who alleges she was abused by him after meeting him at Interloken, the Mirror reports. So I think when you have a situation like Interlochen or the New York Academy of Arts or any of these schools where these girls were groomed and abused by Epstein. I think that there needs to be a huge investigation into all of these places. All of these places. That goes for Mar a Lago as well. If Ghislaine Maxwell was trolling for girls down at Mar a Lago, then an encompassing investigation must hatch, must occur. Any girls that were perhaps approached by Maxwell, et cetera, et cetera. It needs to be an all out blitz because there are for sure, sure for sure, unnamed survivors and victims of the Jeffrey Epstein enterprise. Zero doubt in my mind, folks. Epstein's former girlfriend, co conspirator, fellow child abuser, general all around scumbag and bipedal serpent, Ghislaine Maxwell is also named as a defendant in the suit. Maxwell is currently awaiting trial in New York on sex trafficking charges over her alleged role in Epstein's crimes. Though she denies any wrongdoing, Jane Doe says she first encountered the pair in 1994 when she was 13 years old and a music student at the school. She says Epstein then subjected her to abuse over a period of four years at his homes in Palm Beach, New York, and New Mexico. All right, so you know what's coming here, right? The obligatory New Mexico rant. Why has Zorro Ranch not been raided yet? Why is there not a concurrent investigation going on in New Mexico when we know people were abused there? I think it's almost time for another trip down to Santa Fe. I think it's almost time to hop in the car, pack up my gear this time instead of flying and drive down to Santa Fe and really get some. Some information about what the hell is occurring. Because when I was there the last time, I couldn't get an answer from anybody as far as people in office or the DA's office or the Attorney General's office, why there was not an investigation at Zorro Ranch as far as a raid, et cetera, et cetera. We have multiple girls, multiple girls who said that they were abused in Zorro Ranch, and yet it has still not been raided. Papers also alleged that Maxwell regularly facilitated and was frequently present for the abuse. Now, we know that the charges against Maxwell are right in this time frame. So this is quite possibly one of the people who Maxwell is being charged criminally for abusing right now, this girl from Interlocan. A reference is also reportedly made to the cabin in Epstein's infamous little black book, where it was listed as Michigan home and Epstein's Lodge. That sinister as F. Huh? Epstein's Lodge, Epstein's Michigan home. On this school's campus, with all these young girls running around. This is where this predator has his home. And it's also notated in the black book. Boy, isn't that nice? The people who facilitated this at Interlokin, the school board, the trustees, all of these people should be fired, and they should never have a job around children ever again. The book is also said to contain the names of at least two former students of Interlocan. The school renamed the cabin and erased any acknowledgement of Epstein as a donor at the time of his initial conviction for sex offenses in 2008. Well, they can try and erase the history. They can try and erase their involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, but we're not going to let that Slide right. This has to go into the catalog. As a matter of fact, this has to go in the catalog as something that occurred. And Interlocan must be looked at under the microscope. Interlocan has previously said it has no record of any other use of the cabin by him beyond that one week in August of 2000. Well, okay, that's what you guys say, but you're not a reliable narrator, Interlocan, in this regard. And I doubt that that was the only time that Jeffrey Epstein was there. Do I have information or evidence to prove that? No, I don't. Speculation on my part, but you know, where there's smoke. It also said it had no record of any complaint raised against Mr. Epstein at Interloken and that policies would not have permitted Mr. Epstein any unsupervised access to the students. I don't believe that for a second. When you have somebody who has as much money as Jeffrey Epstein and he's throwing it around at your school and donating to your school, he's going to have some perks that regular visitors wouldn't. Another former Interlocan pupil, Melissa Solomon, has previously said that she spent six years as an associate of Epstein and Maxwell after meeting them at the school, though she has also said she was never subjected to any abuse. And that's not too odd, right? Epstein and Maxwell were very particular about the girls that they brought into the inner portion of the web. They weren't out here trying to just bring anybody in, right? They had to go through the grooming process, fit the bill, et cetera, et cetera. She said the pair cut ties with her after she refused to take part in an attempt to recruit underage girls from a New York school. There you go right there. It was always something with Epstein and Maxwell, right? They never did anything out of the kindness of their heart. They never did anything to help somebody without helping themselves in return. And this is just another example, folks. This is just a little bit more meat on our sandwich, right? Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were serially abusing people on a regular basis for many, many years. Decades in fact. And all of these people, all of these school boards, all of these so called intellectuals had no idea. I have a hard time believing that. And I know that most of you out there also have a hard time believing that these people truly think that we're stupid. They think that whatever narrative they put out, we're just going to eat up. Well, they're wrong. This narrative that they've been spinning for years about, oh, we don't know anything. We weren't involved. We have no idea what occurred. It's not just. It's not going to cut it anymore. And the deeper we get into this case and the more information that comes out, the more pressure will be put on people like the trustees at Interlocken to come forward and let the people know just exactly what was happening with Jeffrey Epstein. Because more people out there know. There are a lot more people out there that have information that have not come forward yet. And it is time for these people to be compelled to speak about what they know. If they don't want to come forward on their own, then they all must receive subpoenas. If you'd like to contact me, you can do that@bobby capuchirotonmail.com that's B O B B Y C A P U C c I@protonmail.com youm can also find me on Twitter @B O BBY Capucci. All of the links that go with this episode can be found in the description box.
Host: Bobby Capucci
Date: May 15, 2026
This Mega Edition dives deep into how Jeffrey Epstein embedded himself in elite academic institutions across the country—especially Harvard University. Host Bobby Capucci pulls no punches, exploring institutional failures, the role of specific enablers, and the broader implications for society. Drawing from recent in-depth investigative reporting, Capucci details how Epstein used significant financial gifts, personal charm, and strategic relationships to maintain access and rehabilitate his public image, even after his 2008 sex offense conviction.
“It’s ridiculous on its face that a judge from Harvard would be tasked to sit on that three judge panel... Harvard is an absolute den of scum and villainy in my opinion. These people, horrendous. And the way that they covered up their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein for so long is enough to make your head spin.”
—Bobby Capucci (00:58)
“Noak should shoulder a majority of the blame for bringing Epstein around. But what about his bosses? Is there no responsibility for those who are overseeing the department?”
—Bobby Capucci (06:59)
“To hell with what the person has done previously... Who cares if they’re a child molester, a sex trafficker? Nah, no big deal. Give me some of your money.”
—Bobby Capucci (05:20)
“Lip service is nice and all, but what are you doing for the survivors? What are you doing?”
—Bobby Capucci (18:15)
“He used that money as a vehicle always to weasel his way into these people’s lives and abuse these children.”
—Bobby Capucci (28:14)
On Harvard’s moral standing:
“Harvard is a shit school, in my opinion, okay? That’s right. I said it’s a shit school.”
—Bobby Capucci (21:50)
On institutional self-investigation:
“Has there ever been one of these internal reports that really did the right thing and outed all of the rats at the top? No, never does. Always the low hanging fruit.”
—Bobby Capucci (20:20)
On Epstein's motivations and methods:
“Jeffrey Epstein was a sick and disgusting bastard. And Harvard enabled his behavior. Point blank period.”
—Bobby Capucci (22:18)
On Interlochen's facilitation of abuse:
“The people who facilitated this at Interlochen, the school board, the trustees, all of these people should be fired, and they should never have a job around children ever again.”
—Bobby Capucci (35:40)
Bobby Capucci’s “Mega Edition” offers a powerful, thorough critique of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to systematically embed himself within elite academic institutions—highlighting a pattern of willful blindness, institutional failure, and ongoing accountability gaps. Capucci makes it plain: the complicity of America’s most prestigious schools extends far beyond isolated individuals, marking a widespread moral and cultural crisis in academia that has, so far, failed to reckon meaningfully with its role in facilitating abuse.