← The Epstein Chronicles
The Epstein Chronicles
Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein, Stolen Software And The Mossad (6/8/26)
00:52:29
The rumors that Jeffrey Epstein was connected to Mossad have circulated for years because his operation had several characteristics that looked, to critics and researchers, less like a simple rich-man sex-trafficking ring and more like a possible...
Loading summary
Transcript26 lines
- [00:00]
Safeway Announcer
This week at Safeway and Albertsons. Six to 16 ounce selected varieties of strawberries, raspberries or blackberries are $1.99 each. Limit three member price with coupon and extra meaty pork back ribs or St. Louis style spare ribs, bone in, previously frozen are $2.99 per pound. Limit four member price with coupon plus medium avocados, colored bell peppers or English cucumber sold by the each or tomatoes on the vine or sweet onions sold by the pound are $0.99 member price. Visit safewayoralbertsons.com for more deals and ways to save.
- [00:31]
Bobby Capucci
What's up, everyone? And welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. It seems like every time we turn around, even after all these years, there is another accuser coming forward and claiming that they were abused by Jeffrey Epstein. And in today's article from the Daily Beast, that's exactly what we have here again. Now, this person is saying that she used to be one of Jeffrey Epstein's girlfriends. And I always have questions about people who were allegedly his girlfriend. Now all of a sudden, they want to set themselves up as if they're victims as well. I don't know if I buy it. And remember, not every single allegation is true. So for me, it's not believe all women. It never has been. It's always believe the evidence. And if the evidence is present, then of course you believe those allegations. But I don't just believe every single allegation that's put forward. And this is one of those allegations where it's his ex. What about the women who are actually, you know, traffic from Eastern Europe and other places around the world, all of a sudden his ex girlfriends are getting money, too? Seems a little bit weird to me. No, I would think that you'd want to make sure that the money went to the people who actually, you know, deserve the money. Probably a good idea. Today's article is from the Daily Beast, and the headline, jeffrey Epstein's ex says he boasted about being a Mossad agent. Well, isn't that convenient, considering how much the Mossad, Israel and Gaza, is in the news? I'm not shocked to hear that. But when you really start breaking it all down and you start looking at the actual evidence that's been provided, there's no doubt that if Epstein was working for anyone, he was working for the CIA. Now, sure, he. He might have been doing some gigs for the Mossad because he was a free agent. He wasn't a CIA agent. He was an asset. So that means that he had the ability to Bounce around and make dough however he could. But at the end of the day, like a homing pigeon, Epstein always came home to his handlers in the CIA. Who those handlers might be, I have no idea. And anybody out here telling you any different is bullshitting you. They don't know. And furthermore, for as much as people want to talk about Epstein's connections to Israel and the Mossad, seems like those very same people want to leave out his connections to Saudi Arabia and mbs. And people who are omitting things when they're talking about this situation, they're doing it for a reason. They're doing it because they're trying to craft a narrative, as opposed to just looking for justice and going scorched earth. They're looking to craft narratives here. Fuck that. We're looking to go Hiroshima, folks. Okay? Nagasaki. Absolute scorched earth. Nobody who was involved, left standing. You can't pick and choose who you're going to eviscerate in this story. It's either everyone or no one. This article was authored by Kate Bricklett. A former girlfriend and victim of. Jeffrey Epstein is suing the late sex trafficker's estate, claiming he boasted of being a Mossad agent before raping her, as at his New York mansion. The California woman referred to as Jane Doe 200 in a new lawsuit says she met Epstein through a friend in Los Angeles in 2000. What began as a platonic relationship turned romantic before Epstein sexually assaulted her a year later. During their time together, Doe says Epstein and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, hinted he was an agent for Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, just like Maxwell's father, Robert. For her part, Ghislaine allegedly warned Doe that it was not good to be Epstein's enemy. Look, Epstein said a lot of stuff. Epstein talked a whole bunch of garbage. Did he work for the Mossad in some capacity? I'm guessing he did. Just like he worked for the CIA and anyone else who was willing to pony up some dough. But none of those organizations are going to be able to get him off when it comes to criminal charges here in the United States. Every single time Epstein was around, anyone who went to prison and everybody else went to prison, and somehow he skated. Now, for those of you who might not be initiated in the world of organized crime, that usually means you're a rat. You don't get nailed on huge charges, and then you're out the next day. That's not how this works. Unless, of course, you give him that 302 and proffer. Up a statement, and Epstein certainly was that this dude has been working with the Fed since at least the Bear and Stearns days. I I don't care what the OIG report says. Unlike most people, I've actually read the OIG reports, both of them, and actually shared them here on the podcast with all of you. So we all know the deal, and we all know that the whole narrative's just complete bs. It became obvious that Epstein was not only extremely wealthy, but also suspiciously well connected. More so than all the other powerful men whom he associated, adds the suit filed in Manhattan Federal court on Monday. Despite being in a committed relationship, often spending nearly around the clock time together, what Epstein did for work was not clear. Okay, what does that even mean? There's a lot of people out there that are secretive about their job. A lot of people out there that aren't going to let somebody that they're dating or just having relations with know what they're doing. People are private, so I don't take too much out of that. And does that make him a Mossad agent?
- [05:49]
Podcast Narrator
Come on.
- [05:50]
Bobby Capucci
Epstein, who bragged of being on the Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations, would later invite Doe to a networking event attended by Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the suit says. You know the people that say they don't know who Epstein was, all of these rich scumbags that were at his house going to these events, hanging out with him, but they have no idea who Jeffrey Epstein was. That's what they'll tell you. Question is, do you believe them? And as far as the Council on Foreign Relations goes, there's no doubt that Jeffrey Epstein was part of that. And there's no doubt that he gave them a great deal of money. We've already covered that time and time again. He also name dropped world political figures, billionaire businessmen and notorious international criminals, the complaint states. While he was gentle and kind to Doe most of the time, Doe did observe Epstein's explosive, uncontrollable anger towards Ward others, the lawsuit says. Those complaint provides another window into Epstein's world and is one of several pending lawsuits related to the trafficker's crimes after his 2019 death. Earlier this month, one victim sued renowned psychiatrist Henry Jarecki for allegedly exploiting her and other young women Epstein had also sexually abused. And what's funny about that Henry Jarecki cat, his son is actually the director of that Robert Durst documentary called the jinx. Well, it's Mr. Jarecki's son who is the director of that. Maybe he could do a documentary on his sick ass dad. Maybe he could do a documentary on the fact that his pops was allegedly diddling girls that he should have been helping. Brad Edwards, an attorney for Doe, told the Daily Beast, in addition to Epstein's rotation of victims, there was typically one person who he made believe was his girlfriend. He usually completely in the dark about his criminal abuse. And look, there's a lot to be said of that. There have been a lot of women that have been in Epstein's orbit that thought they were his girlfriend. And I've told you time and time again that that wasn't the case. This man didn't have girlfriends. Jane Doe 200 was that girlfriend during this period of time. Which means she learned more information than most other victims. Edwards added. In the end, Epstein violently raped her in a manner far worse than than his usual modus operandi. This victim has lived in a particular fear for a long time and she deserves justice. Look, if her allegations are true, there's no doubt she deserves justice. Unfortunately, we all know justice is in short supply. Doe's lawsuit names Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, the co executors of Epstein's estate, as defendants and alleges battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Daily Beast has contacted a lawyer for Epstein's estate for her comment. Yeah, good luck with that. While the accuser believed she was in a committed monogamous relationship with Epstein until he forcibly raped her at his Manhattan mansion, he was also abusing underage girls in Florida and elsewhere. Okay, look, I don't really know about this one, folks. Honestly, I'm not too sure. I mean, they're in a committed relationship, then all of a sudden, now she's talking about how she was abused. My question is, is this person facing some sort of allegation of her own and she's trying to use this as a cover story? Now that's just speculation. I don't know this is a Jane Doe. I'm not even sure who this person is at this point. But this certainly isn't the case of some little girl being groomed, that's for damn sure. As part of his long running trafficking scheme, Epstein and his associates lured girls and young women to his luxurious homes with promises of career or financial help, then forced them into sexualized massages. When Doe met Epstein, he inquired about her passions and made it clear that he was a well connected person and offered to introduce her to world renowned scientists and other professionals in the fields in which she was interested. Epstein even introduced Doe to his Brother, mother, and friends. Their dates included visits to auction houses and antique shops and one helicopter trip to Princeton University to attend a lecture by Epstein's friend, Professor Martin Nowak. Oh, isn't that nice? Little trip to Princeton, huh? And honestly, does this sound like somebody who is being abused? Sounds like somebody who was in an actual relationship. Doesn't sound mysterious to me. Met his mom, met his brother, going to this Princeton thing. So I won't say that Epstein didn't abuse this woman. I don't know. But this isn't the usual type of situation that we're discussing, and this isn't the usual scenario of a young girl being groomed. We're talking about somebody who was in a consensual relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, who was an absolute monster. So my question again is, is this person here facing some sort of allegation against them, and they're trying to use this as cover? Back then, Epstein claimed he had only had sex with five women in his entire life, including British socialite Maxwell, his former girlfriend and now convicted accomplice, who was around frequently as Epstein's friend. While Epstein's strategy with Doe was different, the complaint says he infiltrated her life in a unique and arguably more disturbing way. Epstein, over the course of months, caused Doe to believe they were in a committed relationship, that she was the one and only real girlfriend he had ever had, and that he had cared for. The legal filing states, once he knew Doe felt the same way, he forcibly raped her. So I don't understand. If they were in this relationship and they were already having relations, why would he just up and rape her after they state their feelings for each other again? I'm not saying this is wrong or that she's making this up because Jeffrey Epstein was a animal, and it's very possible, but it just doesn't smell, if you will, the same way the other recipe smells. And that could be because there's some different ingredients here. Or on the flip side, it could be a. A completely different dish. The incident occurred in the fall of 2001, when Epstein was getting a traditional massage at his Upper east side mansion. The masseuse began kissing Epstein, and Doe became upset. Before Doe could leave, the complaint says, he physically forced her face down on the massage table and violently vaginally penetrated her. Given the violence behind the rape, the lawsuit says, Doe knew in that moment that she had to escape. She feared Epstein would retaliate if she reported him to police, so she fled to California and broke up with him. Doe genuinely believed that any reporting of the rape by what she believed to be a Mossad agent with some of the most unique connections in the world would result in significant bodily harm or death to her, the filing says.
- [12:22]
Safeway Announcer
This week at Safeway and Albertsons, 6 to 16 ounce selected varieties of strawberries, raspberries or blackberries are $1.99 each. Limit 3 member price with coupon and extra. Meaty pork back ribs or St. Louis style spareribs, both in previously frozen are $2.99 per pound limit for member price with coupon plus medium avocados, colored bell peppers or English cucumber sold by the each or tomatoes on the vine or sweet onions sold by the pound are $0.99 member price. Visit Safeway or Albertsons.com for more deals and ways to save.
- [12:53]
Bobby Capucci
Still, Epstein tried to contact dove frequently. In 2003, Epstein offered her a once in a lifetime opportunity to network with influential people, and she accepted the invitation because she was facing immigration issues. Doe, while hesitant to be in Epstein's orbit, again, attended the networking event purely for work purposes, the complaint Sundays. She met Google's page and Brin, and Epstein told her several of the people at the event would spend time at his New Mexico ranch afterwards. She joined them there, but avoided Epstein so that he couldn't assault her again. Wait a minute, I thought nobody went to this ranch. Nobody's ever been there. Certainly not Bill Clinton and Sergey Brin and Larry Page. Ah, they don't even know who Jeffrey Epstein is. Right? Right. Doe frequently continued to be contacted by Epstein, the suit says, and despite her belief that Epstein could harm or kill herself if he did not get his way, given the immense harm he inflicted on her, she refused to ever see him again. All right, folks, well, another allegation, and I'll tell you, it doesn't smell like the other ones, but that doesn't mean it's not true. But this certainly isn't the schoolgirl kind of story that we' been talking about. You know, a little girl from Palm Beach High School getting groomed and enticed over to Epstein's house. This isn't that. This is somebody who entered into a consensual relationship with Epstein at some point, and then from there she says it turned violent and south. And now because of that alleged abuse, she's looking to sue the estate and she's looking to get that bag. So like usual, we'll keep an eye on this one and we'll see where it all goes and we'll see what kind of information pops up and when I can get my hands on the court documents. We'll definitely get those added to the catalog as well. But until then, that's gonna do it for this one. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone? And welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. Virginia Roberts had a post on Twitter where she was asking if anyone else believed that Jeffrey Epstein was a spy and he was working for the Mossad or the CIA. And I think this is probably the question I get the most when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein and how he was able to do what he was able to do. And I think the answer is somewhere in the middle. I don't think that Jeffrey Epstein was your traditional spy, if you will, but I think he was an asset that was being run by multiple agencies. And was there some overlap with the CIA and the Mossad? Oh, I'm sure there was, but there's a lot of people out there that act like Jeffrey Epstein was a legit Mossad spy, like he went to spy school in Israel and the rest of it, and that's just not the case. So for me, there's zero doubt that this guy was an asset. But a full blown spy in the traditional sense of the word? I don't think so. Look, these intelligence agencies, they recognize tools that they can use to. To perpetrate whatever sort of scheme or plot that they have. But the second that the asset's usefulness has worn out, or if the asset is deemed to be somebody that might expose the rest of the operation, that asset will get burned. And considering Jeffrey Epstein's fate, I don't think it's that big of a leap to say that that's what happened here. Now, I'm not saying that they killed him per se, but what message did. Did Tartaglioni give Jeffrey Epstein in that cell when they were in that cell together and Tartaglioni allegedly assaulted him? I have always believed that that assault was a message being passed to Epstein by somebody who that somebody is. I won't sit here and make pretend I know. But considering all of the coincidences surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death, considering the fact that all this information was about to come spilling out, you would have to think that there's a lot of powerful people out there that. That aren't too comfortable or weren't too comfortable with that information about to make its way into the public. So I've always believed that there's way more to this story with Nicholas Tartaglioni than they've ever let on. And we only got a little portion of that story. And even in the OIG report that some people point to as if it's some kind of bible or something, we got barely a mention of what happened with Tartaglione.
- [17:13]
Podcast Narrator
And.
- [17:13]
Bobby Capucci
And then we hear about the lame ass investigation that they kicked off in the aftermath of it. Basically just asking him, did you do this? He says no. And then they move on. Then you move into the area where the tape has been destroyed or it's been lost. You know, all of it. And for me, none of the explanations that I've been given by the powers that be have been good enough explanations. And in fact, they only open up when. More questions. So moving on to the article from Newsweek and the headline, prince Andrew's Accuser Shares Jeffrey Epstein Spy Theory. This article was authored by Jack Royston. Prince Andrew's accuser posted a link to a Reddit post suggesting Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad or CIA spy. Virginia Roberts sued the Royal for sexual assault in London, New York and and the US Virgin Islands. When they settled out of court in 2022 for an undisclosed sum, Andrew acknowledged that she was an Epstein sex trafficking victim. The Prince denied the allegations against him. Imagine trying to get off with that nonsense. Yeah, I'm gonna deny these allegations, but let me give you this bag real quick. Conspiracy theorists, boy, that's a hoot. Have long speculated about whether Epstein's wide ranging sexual abuse was part of an elaborate campaign to acquire compromising material about high profile figures and politicians on behalf of intelligence agencies. Newsweek has no definitive evidence to back up this account and no official confirmation. But it's not entirely without foundation. Look, I don't think there's any doubt that good old Jeffrey Epstein was being run as an asset. Now, who his handler was, who was in charge of it all, I have no idea. And all the people out here that pump the BS like they know. Well, I'd like to see the proof. Remember, big claims require big proof. And when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein and people who say that they have proof, who said that they have all this evidence? Well, I'm a trust but verify kind of guy at this point, if you get my drift. Considering all the grifters and snake oil salesmen and bullshit artists that have made their way through this whole thing, I think that at this point it's either put up or shut up for me. But as far as the overall question, was he working for spy agencies? Was he an asset? I think the answer is definitively yes. The part that's still Murky is who he was working for in the first place. And I have my suspicions that it wasn't just one intelligence agency. Now, I think that Epstein was a tool of the United States government, at least as far as being used as a snitch. And folks, you don't avoid going to prison. In all of the scandals that Jeffrey Epstein was involved in throughout all of these years, if you're not working with the government, he was making the same moves like Whitey Bulger. The question is, who was Jeffrey Epstein's handler? And I think it's a long shot of long shots that we're ever gonna find out who that handler was. Roberts posted a link on Twitter to a Reddit post that asked, does anyone else here believe Epstein in all likelihood was a Mossad CIA linked intelligence agent that was responsible for helping run a blackmail honeypot ring to entrap elite oligarchs? And yeah, look, there's a lot to that. There's no doubt that Epstein dealt in information.
- [20:45]
Podcast Narrator
And.
- [20:45]
Bobby Capucci
And when you get to the level that these people are at, information is worth more than even money. But I think it even went deeper than that. Remember that Jeffrey Epstein was always hanging out with these scientists, too. Ask yourself why. What sort of projects were these scientists working on? And were any of those projects top secret? And if they were, what was Epstein doing with the information that he was getting from these scientists? That's a question that is very rarely asked. But for me, when I went to New Mexico and I went down to the Santa Fe Institute, there was way too many questions that needed to be answered. And still to this day, those questions remain unanswered. And a lot of it has to do with Epstein and his dalliances with the scientific community. Based off all of Epstein's known dubious activities, the post added across the vast wealth obvious connections to the Israeli Mossad. Ghislaine Maxwell's dad was Robert Maxwell, a powerful British oligarch with Mossad ties. And Epstein's suspicious murder, that's been covered up as a suicide. I think a strong argument can be made. Epstein was indeed an intelligence agent who helped run a blackmail honeypot operation that most likely is still running to this day. Well, in some form, we. Well, you think they just gave up when their buddy Jeffrey Epstein ended up sleeping with the fishes? Zero chance. Look, when these guys latch onto a scheme that works, the scheme is going to keep going on. The players are going to change, but the scheme itself, well, it was effective then, it'll be effective now. And please make no mistake Jeffrey Epstein is just the tip of the iceberg. It's important to state that there is no on the record confirmation from the US or any other intelligence that that Jeffrey Epstein was a spy. In addition, his cause of death in 2019 was recorded by suicide by hanging by the New York City's Medical Examiner's office. Well, that clears it up for me because the New York Medical Examiner's office says that it was a suicide. Time to pack it up, folks. Nothing left to see here. Let's just go ahead and move on with our lives and our business. Everything that happened in that jail cell on the up and up, everything that happened with Epstein from the time of his incarceration until the time of his death. If you think anything besides what was in that OIG report, you're a conspiracy theorist. That's basically what the legacy media would have people believe. But the reality is this, the legacy media, like usual, is late to the party. And like usual, they have no idea what they're talking about when it comes to to Jeffrey Epstein. However, this is not the first time it has been suggested that the New York financier. Financier, is it? You mean pedophile, right? Mr. Royston may have had links to the intelligence community. The 2019 book Epstein Dead Men Tell no Tales by Dylan Howard, James Robertson and Melissa Cronin quotes Ari Ben Manash, said to be an Israeli intelligence agent and and handler to Robert Maxwell. In the late 1980s, Epstein dated British newspaper magnate Maxwell's daughter, Ghislaine Maxwell, if you want to call it that, who is serving 20 years in jail. Still not long enough. And for grooming girls for Epstein to abuse Mr. Royston also left out the little part here where Maxwell actually participated in the abuse herself. Kind of an important part, no? And as for dating Ghislaine Maxwell, it's a pretty damn good cover story, right? Ben Minaj said Maxwell introduced him to us and he wanted us to accept him as part of our group. These guys were seen as agents. He added, they weren't really competent to do very much and they found a niche for themselves blackmailing American and other political figures. In conclusion, Ben Monash said to the authors Mr. Epstein was a simple idiot who was going around providing girls to all kinds of politicians in the United States. See, f ing around is not a crime. It could be embarrassing, but it's not a crime. But f a 14 year old girl, that's a crime. And he was taking photos of politicians doing that with 14 year old girls if you want to get it straight, Ben Minash added. They Epstein and Maxwell would just blackmail people. They would just blackmail people like that. And look, there is a lot of truth in everything that was said by Mr. Ben Manaj. And as far as the authors of that book go, Melissa Cronin certainly knows what she's talking about. But you hear from Mr. Ben Minaj here that Epstein was an idiot. He certainly wasn't a functioning Mossad agent or a CIA agent, but an asset. A useful idiot 100%. Those are the favorite kind of tools of the CIA, of the Mossad.
- [25:43]
Safeway Announcer
This week at Safeway and Albertsons, 6 to 16 ounce selected varieties of strawberries, raspberries or blackberries are $1.99 each. Limit three member price with coupon and extra meaty pork back ribs or St. Louis style spareribs bone in previously frozen are $2.99 per pound. Limit four member price with coupon plus medium avocados, colored bell peppers or English cucumber soldiers by the each or tomatoes on the vine or sweet onions sold by the pound are $0.99 member price. Visit safewayoralbertsons.com for more deals and ways
- [26:12]
Bobby Capucci
to save Vicky Ward, who's reporting for Vanity Fair, played a role in the Epstein scandal, wrote in a piece for Rolling Stone magazine that the notorious financier pedophile told exaggerated stories of his time in intelligence circles. But some of those stories may have been at least partially true. Ward quoted a former business partner of Epstein, Stephen Hoffenberg, whom the disgraced financier testified against during a criminal prosecution. Hoffenberg said that Epstein had talked about links to the intelligence community and when I said he was a snitch for the government, this is what I mean. He took the stand and signed a 302, signed a proffer agreement with the government to put Steve Hoffenberg behind bars. Meanwhile, it was Epstein who was the mastermind of that whole ass scheme. So what, you think once the government had Epstein on paper that was the end of it? They were like, ah, you know what, this guy isn't going to be useful anymore. Let's just forget about him. Zero chance they're not going to waste an asset like that until it's time to waste an asset like that. These related to national security issues involving blackmail, influence trading, drugs, trading information at a level that is very serious and dangerous. Ultimately, short of official confirmation, it is impossible to know with any certainty whether Epstein had links to intelligence agencies or not, and if so, how strong those links are. Either way, the idea is not concocted out of Thin air as many conspiracy theories are. Well, that's because this is not a conspiracy theory, in my opinion. This is a fact. We just have to hammer out all the details, right? I can't give you particulars because I don't know. But what I can tell you is the aberrant behavior that was shown by Epstein and the favorable punishment that was handed down to Epstein and the ability of Epstein to continue to do what he did for all those years. That is not normal. And most people aren't afforded the space to operate the like Jeffrey Epstein was. So do I think that Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad spy? Not in the traditional sense. I do think that him and Maxwell were both assets and they were being run by multiple agencies. But like most things, when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, we're left to wonder what's real and what's not. And in my opinion, that's always been by design. Alright folks, that's going to do it for this one. If you'd like to contact me, you can do that@bobby capuchirotonmail.com that's B O B B Y C A P U C C I protonmail.com all of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.
- [28:58]
Podcast Narrator
What's up everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. In this series we're going to take a closer look at how the Promised Software scandal of the 80s intersects and connects with what we're seeing today with Jeffrey Epstein. At first glance, these may seem like
- [29:16]
Bobby Capucci
two very different stories.
- [29:17]
Podcast Narrator
One about a stolen computer program used by prosecutors. The other about a convicted sex offender with ties to some of the most powerful people in the world. But when you examine the details, some of the same patterns begin to emerge. Promise was more than just a piece of software.
- [29:36]
Bobby Capucci
It became the center of a major
- [29:37]
Podcast Narrator
controversy involving Department of Justice allegations of fraud and eventually claims that it had been modified and repurposed by intelligence services to spy on governments and financial systems around the globe. And one of the central figures allegedly was none other than Robert Maxwell himself, the media tycoon and father of Ghislaine Maxwell. His alleged role as distributor of the compromise software has raised questions that remain unresolved to this day.
- [30:07]
Bobby Capucci
Fast forward to the Epstein scandal and
- [30:09]
Podcast Narrator
we see a similar set of questions. Powerful institutions looking the other way, intelligence ties being whispered about but never fully confirmed, and a cover up narrative that seems designed to protect the very people who benefited from the operation. In both cases we find the same hallmarks of intelligence tradecraft fronts. Leverage secrecy and the sudden silencing of individuals who might have revealed too much. So in this series, we're going to explore those parallels. We'll look at how Promise and Epstein share structural similarities in the way power is maintained and how accountability is avoided. And by the end, hopefully you may see that these aren't isolated scandals at all, but part of a recurring pattern in how intelligence networks operate across the decades. The story begins with Promise, short for Prosecutor's Management Information System. Developed in the 1970s by Washington, D.C. based company called Inslaw Incorporated, Promise was designed to help prosecutors track criminal cases across complex dockets. At its core, the program was a case management tool that could link seemingly unrelated cases and defendants, a powerful innovation for the time. By the early 80s, the U.S. department of justice expressed strong interest, and Promise Inslaw, run by former prosecutor Bill Hamilton, signed a contract to install the software in U. S. Attorney's offices nationwide. But almost from the start, tensions arose between Inslaw and the DOJ over payments, modifications, and ownership rights. Hamilton insisted that his company had developed an enhanced version of Promise with private funds, which meant the government would need to license it properly. The Justice Department, however, argued that it had rights to the software under federal contracts. This dispute escalated into a bitter feud that would spill into the courts and into congressional investigations. By the mid-1980s, Inslaw accused the DOJ of effectively stealing its software. A bankruptcy court judge later found that officials had engaged in trickery, fraud, and deceitful in dealing with INS law. The court's language was unusually strong, painting a picture of a government agency muscling a small contractor out of its intellectual property. But the Promise scandal didn't stop at contract law. Soon allegations emerged that the stolen software had been modified by U S Intelligence agencies to include secret backdoors. These alleged backdoors allowed American spy services to monitor foreign governments, banks, and corporations who thought that they were merely buying sophisticated case tracking tools. Stories spread that Promise had been sold or handed over to allies and adversaries alike, often without their knowledge of its hidden features. Israel was frequently mentioned in this context, some alleging that Israeli intelligence had distributed alter versions of Promise worldwide. The software, according to these accounts, became a Trojan horse and global espionage. Adding to the intrigue were reports that versions of Promise had been installed in financial institutions. If true, this would have allowed intelligence services to track money flows across borders, offering insights into everything from arms deals to covert funding networks. For critics, this was less a business dispute than a global surveillance conspiracy. Throughout the late 1980s and 1990s, in investigative journalists dug into the Story. Danny Casolaro, a freelance journalist, became the most infamous. He linked Promise to what he called the Octopus, a shadowy network of intelligence agencies, organized crime figures, and corrupt officials. Casalero died in 1991 in a hotel bathtub under suspicious circumstances. His death officially ruled a suicide. Many, however, believed he had been silenced. Casalero's death supercharged the Promised narrative for conspiracy researchers. It was proof that the scandal wasn't just about software licensing. It was about control, surveillance and the silencing of inconvenient truths. His notes suggest that he believed Promise tied in to Iran Contra banking scandals and even covert assassination programs. Meanwhile, Congress began to take notice. Hearings were held, reports were written, and questions were asked about how the DOJ handled its dealings with Inslaw. While some findings criticized the government's conduct, others stopped short of endorsing the most explosive allegations. Still, the perception remained that something rotten had occurred. Meanwhile, Inslaw fought for years in court. Though Hamilton scored some early victories, appellate courts later overturned rulings, leaving him without the vindication that he sought. The legal saga dragged on, consuming decades of his life and cementing Promise as a byword for David versus Goliath battles with the federal government. For intelligence watchers, the heart of the scandal was whether Promise truly had been weaponized. The software's ability to cross reference data across multiple systems was revolutionary, and if implanted globally with a hidden backdoor, it could have provided unparalleled surveillance power. That possibility alone made the story enduring. Foreign intelligence services reportedly caught on some accounts claim that Canada, Britain, and even the Soviet Union became wary of Promise. Allegedly, hackers and foreign governments tried to reverse engineer it or strip out its supposed surveillance hooks. Whether fact or rumor, the story illustrated the paranoia of the late Cold War years. Even within the U.S. suspicion swirled. Some whistleblowers claimed that Promise had been used to track not just criminals, but political dissidents, journalists and activists. If true, this would have represented a chilling expansion of government surveillance under the guise of case management. By the 2000s, promise had largely faded from public consciousness, but it never entirely disappeared. It became a touchstone in discussions about surveillance technology long before Edward Snowden's NSA revelations. For many, Promise was a prototype of software designed to look innocuous but function as a spy tool. The scandal also left scars on Inslaw and Hamilton. Despite decades of litigation and lobbying, he never fully recovered the company's footing. The story of Promise became a cautionary tale of how small innovators could be crushed when their technology intersected with national security interests. For researchers, Promise became part of a larger mythology. It was said to link everything from BCCI banking scandal to Iran Contra, from COVID arms deals to political assassinations. Whether or not those links were provable, Promise served as a narrative glue for for an era of deep mistrust in the government. Critics, meanwhile, caution that much of Promised lore rests on circumstantial evidence, conflicting testimony and speculative leaps. They argue that while the DOJ likely mishandled its contract with Inslaw, the grander espionage tales remain unproven. Still, the persistence of the story speaks to how plausible such tactics seemed during the Cold War. And Promise now occupies a strange space in history, part legal dispute, part espionage thriller, part conspiracy legend. Today, Promise is remembered less for its technical brilliance than for the scandal surrounding it. Whether it was truly weaponized or not, the perception that it could have been has shaped decades of suspicion about government software deals and surveillance. That suspicion has only deepened in in the digital age. And so the Promise scandal lingers. A ghost of the 80s and one ghost from the 80s that looms is none other than Robert Maxwell, and this is where he allegedly enters the story. So now what we're going to talk about in this section is from sources and from people that are in the know. So I just want to make clear that I don't have the receipts, but this is what people who were involved in this have to say, including somebody that was very, very, very high up in Israeli intelligence, who gave a deposition or an affidavit, I should say, talking about this very thing. So I'm going to say allegedly here and then I'm going to continue reading through the piece without saying allegedly.
- [38:52]
Safeway Announcer
This week at safeway, and Albertsons, 6 to 16 ounce selected varieties of strawberries, raspberries or blackberries are 199 each. Limit 3 member price with coupon and extra meaty pork back ribs or St. Louis style spare ribs. Bone in previously frozen are $2.99 per pound limit for member price with coupon plus medium avocados, colored bell peppers or English cucumbers sold by the each or tomatoes on the vine or sweet onions sold by the pound are $0.99 member price. Visit safewayoralbertsons.com for more deals and ways to save.
- [39:24]
Podcast Narrator
The story of Promise takes on an even darker and more labyrinthine dimension with once Israel's Mossad and the enigmatic figure of Robert Maxwell entered the frame, by the late 80s, rumors were already swirling that the software had already been spirited away from its American origins and modified abroad. In this version of events, Mossad seized upon promises cross Referencing power and inserted a hidden backdoor, turning the program into a weapon of surveillance far beyond anything Bill Hamilton of Inslaw could have imagined. Robert Maxwell, the flamboyant and controversial British media mogul soon emerged as a key character in this narrative. Known for his towering presence in Fleet street and his tangled business empire, Maxwell was long suspected of intelligence ties. Some researchers insist he was not only an occasional asset, but a committed operative for the Mossad, leveraging his media holdings and and political influence to advance Israel's interests. When Promise entered the picture, Maxwell was perfectly positioned to become its global salesman. Robert Maxwell, publisher, dealmaker and longtime Israeli
- [40:34]
Bobby Capucci
asset, was perfectly placed to become the
- [40:36]
Podcast Narrator
salesman for this new version. He had deep relationships with governments, parliament and security services. He could show up in Eastern Europe, Africa or Latin America offering advanced Western software package without drawing suspicion. Behind the glossy brochures, Maxwell was acting as a Mossad cutout, seeding a compromise program into the very infrastructure of other states. Now the operation was elegant. Instead of breaking into embassies or bribing informants, Mossad can now simply watch through the back door of Promise. Court Systems. Intelligence databases, financial transaction hubs, all of them became open books. Israeli and CIA analysts could see who was being prosecuted, which informants were being flipped and which shell companies were moving arms money. Maxwell provided the front. Mossad and the CIA provided the technology. And together they created a surveillance empire hidden inside of a case management program. Alright folks, we're going to wrap up episode one right here. And in the next episode, we're going to pick up where we left off. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box. What's up everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going to pick up where we left off, talking about the Promise software scandal and how it intersects with Jeffrey Epstein. Evidence of Maxwell's intelligence work stretches back decades. Former Mossad officers have gone on record calling him a trusted asset who carried out sensitive missions. His media empire gave him cover and access. It also gave him leverage. He could use his newspaper to build relationships with heads of state who would then be open to business pitches. The Promise operation fit perfectly within his skill set. He was a showman, a dealmaker, and a man who understood secrets. Sources inside Israel later said that Mossad had a dedicated unit for Promise. Engineers allegedly stripped down the code, inserted the trapdoor and tested it before handing it out to Maxwell. He would then broker sales to governments who had no idea they were buying a Trojan horse. The Soviets, the Chinese The Canadians, even some U.S. agencies, all were rumored to have installed Promise at one point. In each case, Mossad was effectively reading their mail in real time. Maxwell's Moscow trips were not just journalistic junkets. One alleged meeting, he demonstrated Promise to KGB officials as a Western innovation that could streamline their bureaucracies. The kgb, always hungry for technological parity, took the bait. By installing Promise, they opened their internal operation to Israeli surveillance at the tail end of the the Cold War. It was an audacious move, Mossad riding inside the KGB's own system. The operation extended to banks and trading platforms. Modified Promise versions were marketed to financial institutions under the banner of fraud detection and transaction tracking. Once installed, the software allowed Israeli intelligence to see how money moved across borders, which accounts were connected to arms dealers, and how covert funds were laundered. This was intelligence gold. Instead of chasing rumors, Mossad had a live feed of the world's covert cash flow. Maxwell's cut was enormous. He reportedly earned tens of millions in commissions, which he used to prop up his crumbling business empire. Mossad gained global reach. Both sides got what they wanted, until Maxwell began to push for more. According to several intelligence veterans, he started using his knowledge of the operation to extract larger payments, threatening to expose it if he wasn't paid. That was a dangerous game to play with a service known for eliminating liabilities. Inside Washington, pieces of the story began to break. Journalists like Danny Casalero stumbled onto fragments of the Promise Maxwell operation. Casalero called it the Octopus. A network of intelligence, organized crime, and high finance. He told friends he was close to blowing it open. Days later, he was found dead in a hotel bathtub with his wrist slashed. Officially, suicide. Unofficially, many believe he was silent for getting too close to the truth about Promise and Maxwell. Congressional inquiries were hamstrung, Witnesses recanted, documents vanished, and intelligence agencies stonewalled. The final reports were cautious, but between the lines, they acknowledged evidence that Promise had been transferred to Israel and repackaged. What they didn't say openly was that it had become one of the most successful covert operations of the late Cold War, giving a small country unprecedented insight into the affairs of superpowers. Maxwell's death in 1991, his body floating off his yacht, the Lady Ghislaine, fits this pattern. Officially, it was an accident or suicide. But intelligence insiders have long whispered that it was an execution. Maxwell had become a liability, his debts mounting, his demands growing. Rather than risking exposure of the promised operation, Mossad cut him loose. Within weeks, his companies collapsed, his secrets scattered, and his reputation shifted from tycoon to disgraced businessman. Even after his death, traces of Promised Network persisted. Governments quietly replaced the software, but not before years of sensitive data had been siphoned off. Financial institutions rewrote their systems. But by then the intelligence had already been harvested. For Israel, the operation was a triumph. For the rest of the world, it was a cautionary tale of about how easily a benign program could be turned into a global surveillance platform. The Promise affair also showed how the lines between allies and adversaries blur in intelligence work. The United States looked the other way while its ally used stolen software to spy on governments, including perhaps American agencies themselves. The scandal foreshadowed later revelations about the NSA's global spying. Promise was the prototype. Maxwell Massad and the CIA were the pioneers. For Bill Hamilton, learning that his software had been used this way was a bitter revelation. He had built Promise to help prosecutors catch criminals. Instead, it had become an instrument of espionage, theft and perhaps murder. Hamilton's decades long legal battle with the Justice Department was never just about money. It was about reclaiming his creation from the shadows of that had consumed it. Maxwell's involvement also underscored how powerful non state actors can be aligned with intelligence services. He wasn't a case officer or a spy in the traditional sense. He was a billionaire publisher who could pick up the phone and reach presidents by turning him into their frontman, their asset. Mossad leveraged not just his network, but his reputation, cloaking their operation and respectability. This story also explains why so many key players died suddenly or saw their reputations destroyed. Promise wasn't just another government contract. It was the golden key to the world's most sensitive data. People who tried to expose it, from Casalero to Maxwell himself, maybe ended up dead. Others, like Hamilton, were buried under lawsuits and financial ruin. The pattern speaks louder than the official denials. In the years since, declassified fragments and whistleblower accounts have continued to emerge, each reinforcing the outline of the CIA. Maxwell Mossad Promise operation they don't prove every detail, but together they draw a picture of a covert program that used stolen software, a global salesman and a small intelligence service to spy on the world. Today, Promise is mostly forgotten by the public, but inside the intelligence community it is remembered as a template. Modern spyware operations like Stuxnet or Pegasus Echo. Its structure a Trojan horse designed as a legitimate product, distributed through commercial channels and used to penetrate high value targets. In that sense, Maxwell, the CIA and the Mossad were way ahead of their time. Seen this way, the Promised saga is not a conspiracy, but an early chapter in the story of the digital surveillance state. It shows how software can be weaponized, how frontmen can launder espionage, and how official inquiries can be blunted. It's a case study in covert power, and Robert Maxwell's fingerprints are all over it. And that's why, decades later, the Promise scandal still resonates. When you look at this story and you look at Epstein through the lens of intelligence operations, many of the features echo the Promise saga. Secrecy, infiltration, frontman and sudden deaths. The same tools and tactics that turn a piece of software like Promise into a Trojan horse mirror how a sex trafficking ring might be weaponized as a blackmail operation. In both cases, the outward face is benign or even socially acceptable. The hidden purpose is control. Epstein's connections to the Maxwell family, especially Ghislaine, and the legacy of Robert Maxwell provide a bridge between the world of espionage and the world of sexual control. Robert Maxwell, already alleged to have been Mossad linked and the distributor of COVID tools like Promise, passed some of those shadows to his daughter, who later became Epstein's principal collaborator and social broker. The Maxwell link is thus not incidental. It suggests continuity in intelligence linked networks from one generation to the next. One of the hallmarks in both Promise and Epstein's narrative is the use of plausible deniability. In the Promise case, salesmen, shell companies and frontmen obscure the true origin of the software's trapdoors. In Epstein's case, high society donors, philanthropic pretenses and elite networks shield the darker underpinnings of his operation. Just as the Mossad or the CIA the might insert itself behind a software vendor, so too might it or similar agencies hide behind the guise of a financier who seems to collect powerful people. In both narratives, reputational control is critical. Promise scandal was filtered through legal proceedings, classified reports, redactions and denials. Epstein's scandal has been filtered through gag orders, seal filings, plea deals, non disclosures and and manipulated media. The playbook is familiar. Bury the paper trail, vilify or silence those who dig too deep and keep the system opaque.
- [51:27]
Safeway Announcer
This week at safeway, and Albertsons, 6 to 16 ounce selected varieties of strawberries, raspberries or blackberries are $1.99 each. Limit three member price with coupon and extra meaty pork back ribs or St. Louis style spare ribs. Bone in, previously frozen are $2.99 per pound limit. Four member price with with coupon plus medium avocados, colored bell peppers or English cucumber sold by the each or tomatoes on the vine or sweet onions sold by the pound are $0.99 member price. Visit Safeway or Albertsons.com for more deals and ways to save.
- [51:59]
Podcast Narrator
Epstein's possible ties to intelligence are not just speculative fluff. They have some structural resemblance to operations known in intelligence lore. For example, former CIA officer John Caracal described Epstein as a textbook example of an access agent, someone whose role is to grant intelligence services entree into networks of influence rather than act as a violent operative. That is exactly the sort of role that a Trojanized Promise would have played, not as a blunt instrument but as a key to infiltration. Rumors that Epstein might have worked with Mossad have circulated widely when, with press outlets and analysts noting that his MO gathering compromising material, cultivating powerful acquaintances, controlling private spaces is consistent with classic intelligence blackmail operations. One particularly suggestive connection is Epstein's relationship with Ehud Barak, a former prime minister of Israel. Barak met Epstein dozens of times, reportedly flew on his private jet, and was an investment partner in technology ventures linked to defense and surveillance. That overlap between financial, political, and intelligence spheres mirrors the model seen in Promise, where Mossad linked actors use commercial software to interpose themselves into state systems. Another echo is the operational use of data capture. Just as Promise trap doors could siphon case files and legal data, Epstein's properties were allegedly wired with surveillance cameras and and recording devices. Some observers suggest he gathered material on guests, perhaps for leverage. The kind of asymmetric leverage is precisely what an intelligence apparatus might cultivate. The deaths, too, and even the deaths themselves, follow an all too familiar pattern in law's enemies or perceived enemies face legal ruin or suppression. Maxwell met a mysterious, watery death. Danny Casolaro died in a suspicious bathtub scenario. In Epstein's case, he died under contested circumstances while jailed, allegedly by suicide. Yet many people believe foul play was plausible. The coincidence of high stakes intelligence conspiracies and bodies in water is part of the mythology. Maxwell's death offers a particularly acute crossroads. If Mossad partly orchestrated the Promised distribution and Maxwell was implicated in it, then Maxwell's demise may have been a signal, a sabotage, or a cleanup. Was Epstein just a continuance of the networks that operated under the same logic use sex, finance, power, and technology to entangle compromise and control? That continuity is what draws many researchers to see the Epstein scandal not as a separate moral collapse, but as the next ditch in the covert operations quilt? All right, folks, we're gonna wrap up right here, and in the next episode dealing with the topic, we're gonna pick up where we left off all of the information that goes with this episode. Can be found in the Description box
- [55:03]
Safeway Announcer
this week at Safeway and Albertsons. Six to 16 ounce selected varieties of strawberries, raspberries or blackberries are $1.99 each. Limit three member price with coupon and extra meaty pork back ribs or St. Louis style spare ribs bone in previously frozen are 299 per pound. Limit four member price with coupon plus medium avocados, colored bell peppers or English cucumber sold by the each or tomatoes on the vine or sweet onions sold by the pound are $0.99 member price. Visit safewayoralbertsons.com for more deals and ways to save.