← The Epstein Chronicles
The Epstein Chronicles
Mega Edition: The Southern District Of Florida Was Compromised From The Start (6/9/26)
00:55:38
The Southern District of Florida’s handling of Epstein looks even worse when you follow what happened after the sweetheart deal machinery was already moving. This was not just a case where powerful defense lawyers outmaneuvered a federal office; it...
Loading summary
Transcript36 lines
- [00:00]
Bretzky
What's up everybody? It's Bretzky and America is turning 250 and I can't think of a better way to celebrate that than playing on an American owned social casino. Spinquest.com with all of your favorite games, live crafts, bubble craps, live blackjack, there's no better place to play for free and win real cash prizes.
- [00:21]
Spinquest Announcer
Spinquest.com Spinquest is a free to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
- [00:31]
Epstein Chronicles Host
The 2026 FIFA World cup meal at McDonald's is underway with one of nine legendary cups in the lineup. Christian Pulisic, David Beckham, Lamine Yamal, Ronaldinho, Thierry Henry, Son, Heung Min, Alfonso Davies, Santi Jimenez and between the posts, it's Grimace. Get one of nine collectible cups with a FIFA World cup meal at participating
- [00:56]
Lapsed Fan Podcast Host
McDonald's for a limited time while supplies last.
- [00:58]
Epstein Chronicles Host
All rights reserved. 20:26 McDonald's at FIFA World Cup 20:26 what's up everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. The most revolting aspect of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal is not just the abuse itself, but the ecosystem of protection that formed around him. And nowhere is that more visible than in the conduct of former prosecutors who saw the evidence firsthand and still chose proximity over principle. Matthew Menschel was not a bystander in this story. He was directly involved in the legal machinery that produced the non prosecution agreement, a deal that has become synonymous with institutional failure. He had access to the victim statements, the corroboration, the scope of the abuse, and the pattern that clearly established Epstein as a serial predator targeting minors. This wasn't ambiguous evidence, folks. It was not weak testimony, and it was not a gray area case. It was a file full of underage girls describing recruitment, coercion and sexual exploitation in chilling detail. Any competent prosecutor reading that material understands exactly what they're looking at. There's no confusion, there's no uncertainty, and there is no room for reinterpretation. Yet despite that direct exposure, despite that knowledge, the the professional boundary that should have remained permanent did not just erode, it was discarded entirely. And it signals that the weight of those victims accounts was ultimately subordinate to something else. When Alex Acosta delegated key aspects of the Epstein negotiations, Menel became one of the figures shaping the outcome of a case that should have resulted in a federal prosecution with significant prison time. Instead, what emerged was a deal that shielded Epstein and critically insulated unnamed co conspirators from federal charges. That clause alone should have triggered alarms at every level of the Department of Justice. It effectively preempted future accountability for individuals who had not even been fully investigated at that point. Prosecutors are trained to preserve options, not eliminate them. Yet here, the those options were signed away in a manner that defies standard prosecutorial logic. Mental was part of the process, part of the internal decision making that allowed this outcome to take shape. He can't be separated from it. He can't be reframed as peripheral. He was inside the room where this was constructed. And that level of involvement carries weight. That doesn't disappear after the ink dries. Now, I want you to take that reality and put it next to what happened after. Not only did Menshell not maintain distance from Epstein, he moved in the opposite direction entirely. He developed a personal relationship with the man whose case he had helped resolve. In my opinion, that's not just inappropriate, it's obscene. Prosecutors don't befriend defendants after reviewing evidence of systemic abuse. Other, especially when the abuse involves minors. There is an implicit moral line that exists independent of professional rules. And crossing that line requires a level of internal justification that should disturb anyone paying attention. You don't become casual friends with someone whose file contains detailed accounts of exploitation. You have to actively suppress what you know in order to do that. And I don't think that suppression is passive. I think it's deliberate. It's a decision repeated over time until it feels normal. And then you get to a detail that should make everyone's stomach turn. Epstein asking about Menschel's child. Think about the sequence of facts required for that moment to exist. A federal prosecutor reviews evidence that this man targets underage girls, that he recruits them, that he cycles them through a network of abuse, and that he uses wealth and influence to insulate himself. That same prosecutor later stands in a position where that man feels comfortable enough to ask about his kid. That's not just a breakdown of professional ethics. It's a breakdown of basic human instinct. Any rational adult, let alone a trained prosecutor, would create distance so absolute, it borders on hostility. Instead, what you see here is him being familiar. And being familiar is the part that should haunt people. It reflects a level of comfort that should never have been possible, because it tells you something about how Epstein was perceived within certain circles. He wasn't treated as a predator. He was treated as a pure with a complicated legal history. And that reframing is how predators survive in elite environments. They're not confronted as what they are. They're contextualized, softened, and ultimately normalized. Mental's relationship with Epstein is A case study in that normalization. It shows how proximity to power can distort perception to the point where even direct exposure to harm does not produce lasting moral separation. That distortion is an accidental. It's cultivated. It thrives in environments where influence is currency and access is rewarded. And Epstein operated inside that ecosystem with precision. Now look, this isn't just about one individual's failure. It's about a culture that allowed that failure to occur without consequence. Prosecutors are supposed to be insulated from this kind of influence. They're trained to maintain objectivity, to prioritize evidence over relationships and understand the long term implications of their decisions. When someone in that role transitions into personal friends with a subject like Epstein, it raises serious questions about what was happening during the prosecution itself. Were the victims taken as seriously as they should have been? Was the full weight of the evidence actually felt inside that office? Or was it filtered through a lens that prioritized negotiation over accountability from the very beginning? Those questions don't go away. They intensify. They linger over every decision that was made. The non prosecution agreement becomes even more troubling when viewed through this lens. It was not just lenient, it was structurally protective. It. It created a framework that allowed Epstein to avoid federal charges, serve a minimal sentence, and retain access to the very networks that facilitated his behavior. And look, that outcome didn't happen in a vacuum. It was the product of decisions made by individuals who had the authority to pursue a different path. Menschel was among those individuals. His later relationship with Epstein the does not exist separately from that decision. It sits right next to it. It reinforces the perception that the system was compromised at a foundational level. It suggests alignment where there should have been opposition. And what makes this so infuriating for me is the asymmetry between the victim's experience and the consequences imposed on Epstein. The girls who came forward face stigma, disbelief, and long term psychological damage. Their accounts were detailed, consistent, and supported by evidence. Yet the man they accused not only avoided meaningful punishment, he maintained relationships with people who had seen those accounts firsthand. And look, that's not just an injustice, folks. It's inversion. It's the system turning itself inside out in plain view. And it sends a message that power can absorb consequence without breaking. And that message is corrosive. And there's also the question of incentive that can't be ignored. Epstein didn't cultivate relationships randomly. He targeted individuals who had value to him, Whether that value was legal, financial, or reputational. A former prosecutor with direct knowledge of his case represents a Unique kind of asset. It provides insight into how the system operates, how decisions are made, and. And where vulnerabilities exist. The fact that such a relationship formed suggests that Epstein's influence extended beyond the initial prosecution and into the aftermath. And look, that's not speculation. It's consistent with his pattern of behavior. He built networks and he maintained them. Now, Mental's conduct also speaks to a broader issue within elite professional circles, where accountability can become secondary to access. When individuals operate within networks that prioritize connection and influence, ethical boundaries can become negotiable. That does not excuse the behavior. It explains the environment in which it occurs. Epstein thrived in that environment because he understood how to navigate it. He understood that relationships could override reputation if the right incentives were in place. And that understanding, he gave him leverage. It allowed him to operate in spaces that should have rejected him outright. But understanding the environment does not lessen the responsibility of those individuals within it. Menshell was not coerced into forming a relationship with Epstein. He made that choice. He made it with full knowledge of who Epstein was and what he had done. That's what makes it so difficult to accept. It's not ignorance. It's not misunderstanding. It's informed decision making that runs directly against the obligations of his former role. That contradiction is what defines this entire situation. It's also what makes it so hard to rationalize. And look, the disgust here is not performative. I think that it's proportional to the facts. When someone entrusted with prosecuting crimes involving minors ends up personal friends with the perpetrator, it represents a failure at a level that goes beyond policy or procedure. It's a failure of judgment, of ethics, and of basic human decency. It's the kind of failure that erodes public trust in a way that is incredibly difficult to repair. And as you all know, once that trust is broken, it does not come back easily. It lingers as skepticism, as doubt, as anger. And that erosion of trust is one of the lasting examples and consequences of Epstein's case. People look at situations like this, and they don't see an isolated incident. They see a pattern. They see a system that appears to protect certain individuals while failing others. They see decisions that do not align with the severity of the conduct involved. And they see relationships that should never have existed in the first place. That perception is not irrational. It's grounded in observable outcomes. It's reinforced by details like this. Now, the Mental example is particularly stark because it collapses the distance between prosecutor and associate in a way that's impossible to ignore. And it forces you to confront the reality that the same system that's supposed to deliver justice can, under certain conditions, become entangled with the very individuals it's supposed to hold accountable. And that's not a theoretical concern. It's something that played out in real time. It's documented in behavior, relationships, and outcomes. And that makes it harder to dismiss and it makes it harder to contain. And when you step back and look at the broader picture, this is part of why the Epstein case continues to generate so much outrage. It's not just about what Epstein did. It's about how many people around him failed to respond appropriately to what he did. Some of those failures were passive, others were active. And some crossed into territory that feels almost incomprehensible. And this is one of those moments. It's not subtle. It's not ambiguous. It's direct. Because at the end of the day, the question is simple. How does someone look at that body of evidence, understand what it represents, and then choose to form a personal relationship with the man at the center of it? There's no answer to that question that sits comfortably. There's no explanation that resolves that contradiction. And there's no justification that makes it acceptable. There is only the reality of the choice that was made.
- [13:45]
Bretzky
What's up everybody? It's Bretzky. And America is turning 250. And I can't think of a better way to celebrate that than playing on an American owned social casino. Spinquest.com with all of your favorite games. Live crabs, bubble craps, live blackjack, there's no better place to put play for free and win real cash prizes. Spinquest.com Spin Quest is a free to
- [14:10]
Spinquest Announcer
play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
- [14:16]
Lapsed Fan Podcast Host
Boss, what's the most dreaded question that you can get when you tell people you host a podcast called the Lapsed Fan? Ugh, It's. What is it about? And why is that, do you think? Because to like pro wrestling is to lose the respect of others. Now what if we told you there's a podcast that explains exactly why that is and why it's kind of deserved. For over a decade, we've taken fact finding missions through the thicket of half truths that is wrestling history. We watch old matches, call out carnies, laugh at our own jokes, and have so much fun doing it that some people actually can't handle it. Think wrestling is an escape from real life? Think again. Same power games, same office politics, same people lying to your face. Just with entrance music and absolutely no company health insurance under any circumstances. All I offer is opportunity, not benefits. As do we, Vince. The Lapsed Fan Podcast Come for the wrestling history. Stay for the uncomfortable truth about why it used to be better and why you still care.
- [15:16]
Solomonster
Are you a wrestling fan? Even if you're not, I'll bet you're friends with someone who is. There's a lot of wrestling these days. Whether it's on TV in front of 50,000 people or at your local armory in front of 500. You never know what to expect. Even Bad Bunny's been in the ring before. Yes, that Bad Bunny. If you wanna keep up with the good, the bad, and the ugly of the wonderful world of pro wrestling, check out Solomonster Sounds Off. That's my podcast. I've been a wrestling fan as far back as I could form sentences, and I've got a lot of opinions on it. Since 2007, the premier weekly wrestling podcast, and the only one you really need is Solomonster Sounds Off. Find it on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [16:00]
Epstein Chronicles Host
And that reality speaks for itself. All the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. Folks, we have a doozy on our hands with this one, but before we jump into the article, I. I want to lay a little bit of groundwork about the person that we're going to talk about. And it's somebody that we've talked about here on the podcast previously, but it's somebody that should be talked about a whole lot more, especially when we're talking about Jeffrey Epstein and the plea deal. And when we get to the article, you're going to see why. But before we get there, let's set the table. Matthew I. Menshell is a figure whose name may not be as widely recognized as as Jeffrey Epstein's or Alex Acosta's. But within the legal community and among those who have studied the Epstein case closely, it carries immense weight. During the mid-2000s, Menshel served as the chief of the Criminal division at the U.S. attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, an influential post that made him one of the most powerful federal prosecutors in the region. That office, of course, would later become the epicenter for one of the most scandalous plea deals in in American history. Epstein, a financier with friends in high places, had been accused of serial sexual abuse and trafficking of underage girls. What should have been a landmark federal case became under Menchell's Watch, a secret backroom deal that spared Epstein from serious prison time and silenced his victims through procedural manipulation and legal subterfuge. By the time Epstein's legal troubles were reaching their peak in 2007, the FBI had gathered an enormous amount of evidence. Victim statements, corroborating witnesses, phone records, and more, laying the groundwork for a powerful federal indictment. Instead, something changed. Somewhere between the investigative findings and the prosecutorial response, momentum stalled. The stalling point was the Miami U.S. attorney's office and specifically the criminal division, led by Matthew Menshell. As chief, he oversaw the major prosecutions and wielded substantial authority over which cases advanced and which quietly faded. Internal justice department reviews later made public in part identified Menschel as one of the key officials who effectively blocked the FBI from pursuing Epstein's arrest. The decision not only neutered the federal case, but handed control back to the local level, where a far more lenient outcome could be arranged. To understand mental significance, it's important to recognize how unusual Epstein's treatment was. Prosecutors rarely, if ever allow serial sexual offenders accused by dozens of minors to negotiate immunity for themselves and their unnamed co conspirators. Yet that's precisely what occurred. The infamous non prosecution agreement, or mpa, which became Epstein's golden shield, was crafted in secret. But between federal prosecutors and Epstein's legal team, it granted immunity not only to Epstein, but to anyone who might have helped him, effectively erasing the possibility of broader accountability. As chief of the criminal division, Menshel's oversight and approval were essential for such a deal to take shape. Even if he did not personally pen the documents, his position meant nothing of that magnitude could have advanced without his knowledge and and his consent. Now adding to the ethical quagmire is a detail that surfaced years later. Menshell's personal relationship with one of Epstein's lawyers, Lily Ann Sanchez. According to multiple reports, Mitchell and Sanchez dated briefly while both served in the u. S. Attorney's office in Miami. When the Epstein negotiations began, Sanchez began working for Epstein's defense team, a fact that should have triggered immediate recusal or or at the very least, a disclosure to internal ethics officials. The department of justice office of professional responsibility later concluded that Menshel should have disclosed the prior relationship, a gentle bureaucratic phrasing that belies how serious the conflict was. A prosecutor's impartiality must be unimpeachable. Even the perception of bias can undermine a case. In this instance, it wasn't just perception. It was proximity, personal, professional, and potentially pivotal. Critics have since pointed out to this undisclosed relationship as emblematic of the cozy, insular world of high end federal litigation, where the line between adversaries and allies blurs behind closed doors. In Epstein's case, those blurred lines had catastrophic consequences. With Menshel supervising the criminal division and ACOSTA Serving as U.S. attorney, the two oversaw a process that led to Epstein's plea to minor estate charges in 2008, charges that carried a sentence of just 13 months, served mostly in a private cell with liberal work release privileges that allowed him to leave jail up to 12 hours a day. Federal prosecution was quietly abandoned. Victims were not informed of the plea, in clear violation of the Crime Victims Rights Act. And perhaps most stunningly, the the non prosecution agreement ensured that Epstein's powerful friends, enablers and co conspirators whose names appear throughout FBI files, would never face accountability. In the years since, Menshel's role has been dissected by some journalists trying to piece together how such an extraordinary collapse of justice could have happened. According to one detailed report, Menschel was the senior prosecutor who blocked Epstein's arrest in 2007 after FBI agents had requested authorization to take him into custody. Another described him as part of the internal faction that resisted mounting pressure from agents who believed Epstein's crimes warranted federal sex trafficking charges. Whatever his precise actions, what is clear is that Menschel was not a peripheral player. He was central to the decision making apparatus that determined Epstein's fate. When the Department of Justice finally reviewed the case years later, the the conclusions were damning. The review stopped short of declaring criminal misconduct, but made clear that poor judgment and unprofessional behavior among the prosecutors had irreparably tainted the process. The report described the culture of secrecy, internal confusion, and misplaced deference to Epstein's defense team. In other words, the Miami office had functioned less like a prosecutorial body and more like a negotiation table for the powerful. Menschel, as the office's senior criminal chief, was a key architect in that environment. After leaving the U.S. attorney's office, Menschel entered private practice and built a reputation as a top tier, white collar defense attorney. His biography now reads like that of a consummate insider, polished, successful and respected. And yet the shadow of the Epstein case lingers. His time in Miami and the decisions made under his authority remain remain a permanent stain on the record of a legal system that failed spectacularly to deliver justice. And to this day, Menshel has never spoken publicly in detail about his role in the plea deal, nor has he acknowledged any wrongdoing but one thing is for sure. When prosecutors become too close to the people they're supposed to hold accountable, when personal relationships intersect with public duty, the scales of justice tip. And not by accident. Menschel's fingerprints, figuratively speaking, are on one of the darkest chapters in modern prosecutorial history. And while Menschel has hoped that history would just move on, the survivors who were denied their day in court will never forget the names of those who made that denial possible. Today's article is from the Tampa Bay Times, and the headline epstein Had Dinners with Top Florida Prosecutor on his case, according to documents. Boy, who told you folks this? Years ago, I remember arguing with people over this, telling me that that's crazy it wasn't happening that Jeffrey Epstein wasn't having meetings with people like Menshell, and that it was crazy that his legal team would be reaching out to justice brass to make things move in a direction that's more affable to Jeffrey Epstein. Well, I know this is going to come as a shock to you, but those people that were trying to pitch you that narrative that they were wrong again. And I'd love to give the author credit here, but there's no name attached, so I'm guessing it was staff. Jeffrey Epstein had multiple appointments, phone calls and dinners with Matthew Menshell, the Miami U.S. attorney's Office chief criminal prosecutor who spearheaded Epstein's sweetheart deal and 2007 newly released document show. Well, what do you know? All those people who told you that everything was on the up and up, that the whole entire deal was a okay, there was nothing wrong with it. They were lying to you. They were pitching you some kind of bullshit narrative for whatever reason. But the truth has always been very apparent, and the truth has always been right here for anyone to see. And if the DOJ really cared about justice here, if they cared about the survivors, then they'd go and rip that deal up. They do whatever it takes to get rid of it. And they call all these people in Menchel Vilafana, all the people I've been telling you about, and they'd put them all under oath. A tranche of over 8,500 pages of records from Epstein's estate released by the House Oversight Committee Friday show that Epstein's calendars and emails reflect that Menschel, who left the DOJ in 2007, had multiple meetings or dinners with Epstein in 2011, 2013 and and 2017. Lawmakers also referred to a photograph of Menshell on a ski trip with Epstein sometime in the 2000s. But didn't produce the photo. Oh, yeah. Nothing to see here, folks. Just the kind of guy we want prosecuting Jeffrey epstein. Nothing stinks here. The deal is completely fine. It's above board. And if you have any questions about it, well, you should just move on because this is all settled news, right? That's what we were told. That's what the opr report was supposed to do. But the truth is, none of it settled. And not only that, but you're being lied to. And these are the receipts that prove it. Contacted on Friday, menshell initially referred the miami Herald to a 2020 statement that he had previously sent the herald in response to questions about whether he had a business relationship with epstein. I had no business relationship with Mr. Epstein at any point. Not before, during, or after my tenure at the u. S. Attorney's office. He added that epstein had tried to get his firm to handle some of the civil litigation associated with his case, but we declined. Oh, what a great guy this mention is, huh? As you're on your ski vacations, as you're out here hanging out with your buddy Jeffrey epstein. After publication, menchel told the herald that he never skied with epstein. He did not deny that he met with epstein after he left the u. S. Attorney's office. Oh, well, I didn't ski with him, but we were breaking bread. I was over at his house. After all the evidence you saw as a prosecutor, you have the audacity to go and break bread with this dude? And nobody's calling this mental cat out. This dirty, rotten son of a bitch should have been on the carpet from day one. Every last one of those architects of that npa are directly responsible for the people getting away with what they got away with. Remember, it's been the npa that's been their golden suit of armor this whole entire time. Epstein's 2008 deal allowed the new york financier pedophile to escape federal sex trafficking charges that could have put him in prison for life. It also gave immunity to others involved in his crimes, Many whom have never been identified. A 2008 investigation by the miami herald called perversion of justice detailed how federal prosecutors in south florida minimized epstein's abuse of almost 100 underage girls and and work closely with epstein's high powered attorneys to keep the scope of his crime secret.
- [27:58]
Spinquest Promo Voice
Forget whatever plans you have this weekend because you're staying at home and playing on spin quest. And there's never been a better time to sign up than right now. New users get $30 coin packs for just $10. All the table games you love with hundreds of slot games and real cash Prizes. That's at spinquest.com S P I N
- [28:17]
Spinquest Announcer
Q Q-T.com Spin Quest is a free to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
- [28:28]
Epstein Chronicles Host
Well, that's not what Alex Acosta is telling us in the transcripts and we're going to get to those in the next day or two. I've already started recording them and you're going to want to tear your hair out. Bro's obviously lying, but at this point I just expect everybody involved to continue to lie. If they told the truth, I would be absolutely shocked at this point. Following publication of the series, federal prosecutors in New York re examined the case and Epstein was arrested again in 2019 on more serious sex trafficking charges. However, he died nearly a month later in federal custody and what was ruled a suicide by hanging. Friday's revelation about Menschel comes as the House Oversight Committee continues its probe and into the case. Lawmakers are examining whether there were other wealthy and powerful men who were involved in Epstein's crimes and whether there was a cover up by the FBI and Justice Department. Several banks are also under scrutiny for failing to flag financial transactions even though they knew that Epstein had been accused of sex trafficking minors. And they can go with the COVID up from the FBI or the DOJ all they want and there's no doubt that that they're a part of it. But the real information locked away in some vault in Langley or wherever the hell the CIA keeps this. Because remember, it's the CIA who's behind this. Everybody else is just part of the COVID up, right? The whole entire thing was put into motion by the CIA. President Trump, who was once a friend of Epstein's, has denied he had any knowledge or involvement with the money man sex crimes. After initially promising to release the Justice Department files on the case and announcing that a list of Epstein's clients were on her desk, Pam Bondi, Trump's attorney general, abruptly announced in July that a review of the files revealed that there was no Epstein client list and no credible evidence that others were involved in his crimes. No, he did it all on his own. Just another lone wolf, another paddock, right? Just another guy that had some proclivities, saw his chance and he acted. Imagine trying to pitch that shit to people when all of this other evidence is out there. I mean, just this mental stuff alone is damning as hell. Nevermind everything else on top of it, because that's what we're doing. We're just stacking receipts at this point. We all know the story and we all know that we're not being shot straight. But considering the amount of gaslighting and the amount of people that try to rewrite history, the only way to force accountability is to stack the receipts so high that they can't ignore them. And my friends, that's what's starting to happen. All this information that continues to come out is painting a very, very damning picture of the DOJ and this deal that they made with Jeffrey Epstein. And nobody's ever answered for it, ever. Don't tell me that OPR report was anyone answering for anything. That was a cover up job. Oh, well, there was a couple issues here, but, you know, it was just a bunch of coincidences all taking place at the same time. And it took them over three years to come up with that. Meanwhile, Mr. Menshell over here is out having lunch and dinner and ski trips and the whole nine with Jeffrey Epstein. But sure, let's not mention that in the OPR report. You mean to tell me that the inspector general didn't have access to that? If not, why not? And if he didn't have access to that, what else didn't he have access to? That led to a public outcry, especially from Epstein survivors, who held an emotional press conference on Capitol Hill in September to implore Trump to release the files. Trump has called recent attention to the case a hoax. Key questions have long been asked about how Jeffrey Epstein was able to obtain federal immunity in the first place. A judge later ruled that the plea deal, which was initially sealed by Acosta's office, was illegal because it was kept from Epstein's victims and their attorneys. The House Oversight Committee on Friday released a transcript of testimony by Menshell's former boss, Alexandra Acosta, who testified Sept. 19 in front of the committee. Acosta, Trump's former labor secretary, testified that he and and other federal prosecutors, including Menshell, didn't want to take Epstein's case to trial because they considered it a crapshoot. No, you didn't want to take it to trial because you were protecting your boy. And I'm not saying it was Acosta who cooked up the plot. This came from on high. I'm talking Philippe and Mukase. In its coverage of the case, the Herald raised questions about Menshell's role in negotiating the deal. Besides Acosta and and Menshel, the case was overseen by prosecutors Jeffrey Sloman, Andrew Laurie and Anne Marie Vilafana. The Herald found that Villafana, the lead line Prosecutor, drafted an 82 page prosecution memo directed to Acosta, his deputy sloman and Menchel, who was then head of the criminal division. In the memo, she proposed a 60 count indictment of Epstein on sex trafficking charges. Now you see why it was killed. Does it all make sense to you now? Now that you find out who Menshell really is? Now look at me with a straight face and tell me that there's not a cover up in play. A subsequent probe by the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility, OPR later found that its Child Exploitation division in Washington reviewed Filafana's materials, offered to work with her, and called the memo exhaustive and well done. Well, I wonder why they were stopped from doing that. Acosta would later tell federal investigators he could not recall ever reading her memo and that he relied on Menschel and others to know the details of the case. Acosta testified that he never met Epstein or accomplice Glenn Maxwell, who is now serving a 20 year sentence for her child sex trafficking and abuse. In his comments before the committee, Acosta also reiterated that he trusted Menshel, who proposed the plea deal with with Epstein's lawyers. Oh, well, isn't that nice, huh? Leave it all up to Menschel. I told you that there was bad guys lurking in the background and here's one of them. Matthew Menshell, my friend, you're on the clock and it's time you answer some questions. An OPR report issued in 2020 describes how Vilafana became angry in July of 2007 when Menshel explained to her in an email that that he had offered the deal to Epstein's lawyer, Lily Sanchez, the only woman involved in Epstein's defense. Vilafana felt it was an end run around her, the report said. The report also noted that Menshel had dated Sanchez, should have informed his bosses about it, and probably should have been recused from the case. Acosta was asked about Menel at least 17 times during his testimony before the House Oversight Committee. He indicated that he had not been aware that Menshel had a prior romantic relationship with with one of Epstein's lawyers, and that Menshel should have told him so that they could have discussed whether there was a conflict of interest. There was. Is it not plain as day, it's time to tear up that npa? Not tomorrow, not next week, not next month, right now, today. Acosta was also questioned about a photograph that allegedly showed Menshel skiing in Aspen with Epstein sometime in the early 2000s. The committee failed to produce the photograph when asked for more information by Acosta. So we don't know about that picture. I haven't seen it, but I'm guessing they have it. Menshel left the U.S. attorney's office in August of 2007, before Epstein's deal was finalized to take a job with the international law firm Cobra and Kim. His LinkedIn profile indicates he is still a lead trial attorney and at the firm. Ultimately, Acosta approved Epstein's plea deal in 2008 despite evidence that Epstein had molested dozens of high school girls whom he lured to a Palm beach home to give him massages. The massages were a pretense to molest the girls, who ranged in age from 13 to 17 years of age. Epstein pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges, one involving a minor, and would serve only 13 months in a county jail. Although he was forced to register as a sex offender, he was allowed to leave the jail each day to go to his office in West Palm Beach. Several women later filed lawsuits that claimed they were sexually abused by Epstein in his office while he was supposed to be supervised by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office. Acosta testified that Epstein's defense team tried to get Epstein off the hook entirely, but he told lawmakers that he believed Epstein's crimes warranted jail time and stood his ground. Oh, isn't he such a hero? I stood my ground. Shut up, man. You got a Slinky for a spine and Charmin for a heart. Still, he and the other prosecutors, including Vilafana, all agreed that taking it to trial would risk him escaping jail altogether, he said. Part of the reason for the decision, Acosta said, was the reluctance of his underage victims to testify. You mean the ones that were being paid off or threatened? Those girls? It's such a travesty that they think they can rewrite history. The bad news for them is we all know the story already. Some refuse to talk whatsoever, acosta said of the victims. Others said he did nothing wrong. And that's the evidence you have, right? Still, public court records show that Palm beach police and the FBI did gather other evidence, including phone records showing Epstein had contacted underage girls, physical evidence and photographs that the girls were in his home and phone message pads showing countless messages left for him about the girls being available for, quote, unquote, massages. And we're talking about high school girls here. And the messages were on notepads that were retrieved by the investigators after they raided the Palm beach home. Acosta said he wasn't familiar with the corroborating evidence in the case and relied on on his top prosecutor is recommendation. Well, isn't that nice. The guy that was palling around with Epstein recommended that he gets a plea deal. I wonder why in hell he would ever do that. Folks, are you paying attention yet? Do you realize that you've been jobbed, that you've been lied to, that you've been hustled? And make no mistake, this is all part of the COVID up. This is embarrassing as hell for the doj, for the government. They don't want to have this egg on their face. They'd much prefer that everybody just, you know, moved on. He explained to the committee that while the prosecutors believed a crime had been committed, he didn't think jurors would understand the nuances of the case. In other words, the jury would think the victims were prostitutes, they were kids. No, they wouldn't. We're not talking about 25 year old women here. He said, she said, like, you know, Cassie Ventura. We're talking about kids. I want to be crystal clear here, lest I be taken out of context or lest I be clipped on this. No one in our office ever thought that the victims were anything less than victims. No one thought that they were. You know, the idea that they were involved as anything other than victims did not cross the mind of a soul, he said, just lies heaped on top of lies. He just got done telling us how they weren't credible, how the jury wouldn't believe them. Well, guess what, Mr. Acosta? We don't believe you.
- [39:48]
Bretzky
What's up everybody? It's Bretzky. And America is turning 250. And I can't think of a better way to celebrate that than playing on an American owned social casino. Spinquest.com with all of your favorite games, live crafts, bubble craps, live blackjack, there's no better place to play for free and win real cash prizes.
- [40:09]
Epstein Chronicles Host
Spin quest.com Spin quest is a free
- [40:13]
Spinquest Announcer
to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
- [40:20]
Epstein Chronicles Host
Acosta admitted that Epstein's lawyers and their aggressive tactics are would have made the case hard to win at trial. We put him in jail, he registered as a sex offender and the victims had an opportunity to recover and that was a win. Acosta told the committee. Looking at all of this, the ultimate judgment was do you roll the dice? And if he gets away with it, you're sending a signal to the community that he can get away with it. Well, I wonder what signal you guys sent with that Sweetheart deal, huh? Because the optics of it's great. The messaging's fantastic. Everybody loves it. Just the greatest deal ever. The best deal that ever was, Right? Right. Acosta was appointed by Trump as Labor Secretary in 2017. He resigned after Epstein's 2019 arrest because he said he felt the scandal would be a distraction for the Trump administration. Him and Prince Andrew. Huh? We're going to do the honorable thing. We're going to resign. Look, folks, I told you from the beginning that the NPA was the origin of this. And guess what? Now we're finding out that the guy who was behind it, or one of the key architects when it comes to the npa, was one of Epstein's buddies, was going to dinner with him, was going on ski trips. Look, we now have evidence that Jeffrey Epstein, the financier convicted of abusing minors, shared dinners, phone calls, and maybe a vacation ski trip. And friendly meetings with Matthew Imenchel, the very prosecutor who helped orchestrate his infamous 2007, 2008 plea deal, let that sink in. The man entrusted to stand between the predator and justice, the senior attorney in the U.S. attorney's office overseeing Epstein's case, was face to face, off the record, off the docket, off virtue, with the very subject of his office's worst failure. A ski trip, dinners, phone calls, intimacy. All while the victims waited. All while the world believed the law was blind. And now we know that these weren't casual courtesies. They were red flags. There weren't benign social moments. They were conflict. They weren't discreet lapses of oversight. They were a brazen collision of predator and prosecutor. The prosecutor whose division greenlit the sweetheart deal. Now, I want you to think about what that means. Victims of horrific abuse entrust our system for protection. Those in charge hold power for one reason. To safeguard justice. To be the barrier. But when that barrier is compromised, when the protector becomes too friendly with the threat, everything falls apart. The system stops safeguarding and it starts shielding. And that's what happened. So now it's time to burn the sunlight brighter on this injustice. The alleged ski trip, the documents, the calls, the dinners logged. These aren't minor details. These are proof that proximity existed. Influence merged, discretion faltered. And the consequence, A paradigm of justice twisted in favor of the powerful. To Mr. Menshel, to his former office, to every official who turned a blind eye. The world's watching. The survivors are still here. The calls for accountability scoff louder. Justice doesn't always roar. Sometimes it whispers. But this time, it should roar. Because if the seemingly untouchable can meet his prosecutor on a ski slope, then the rest of us deserve to know who else was meeting behind the curtain. Who else smiled while the system faltered? So let's finish with this. Law is supposed to stand for one thing. Equality under its gaze. If it bends for the rich, the cunning, the connected, then what's left for the ordinary, the voiceless, the abused? Release those records, hold the names, demand the accountability. Because when a prosecutor dines with the accused, the accused wins, the victim loses, and we all lose confidence in the promise of justice. And in this case especially, justice must win. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.
- [44:20]
Bobby Capucci
Hello, everyone, and welcome to the Jeffrey Epstein Show. I'm your host, Bobby Capucci, and this is a morning update. We're gonna talk a little bit more about the report that the prosecutors showed to the survivors on Thursday. And coming out of that report, we have another bit of information that is absolutely ridiculous. And it just goes to show that the Department of Justice itself is a shit show. These people, they don't. They don't give a. About anything. All they care about is increasing their power and pushing whatever sort of political narrative that their bosses inject in their stupid heads. We have a report that one of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys dated one of the prosecutors in the trial. So how in the world can anyone look at this and think that these gals got a fair shake? The survivors got absolutely screwed by the prosecutors in Florida and the federal prosecutors as a whole. And now let's remember what we're talking about here in the first case. We're talking about young high school girls from Palm beach mostly. And this scumbag was able to just walk and skate and get off. And you mean to tell me that we're just supposed to ignore all of his connections? We're supposed to ignore all of the relationships that his lawyers have had, no pun intended. And we're just supposed to ignore the fact that he was so close to such a power broker like Bill Clinton. Now, remember, we're talking about 2008 still. Bill Clinton was still a big time power player on the scene, and Hillary Clinton was getting ready to have a job in Barack Obama's administration. These are very, very powerful people that were close to Jeffrey Epstein. And at every turn, he was able to game the system, and he was able to be afforded a certain set of rights and favors that normal people would never, ever, ever, ever be afforded if they were caught up in the same circumstances. And the new information here about one of his Attorneys dating a prosecutor is just, it's just more nonsense. To add to the top of the nonsense mountain, how in the hell is a prosecutor who dated one of his attorneys not recused from the case? How is this person even still working on the case? And how does the Department of Justice find in their shitty ass internal review that just a couple of mistakes were made? Now, I don't think the Department of Justice expected the, the outcry over their information that they released. Right? I don't think that they expected there to be this much of a blowback. But what they need to understand is people have had enough. And we're no longer going to just sit by silently while the Department of Justice drags its feet and does not pursue the people that need to be pursued. We'll be here every single day. We'll be talking about it. We'll be raising hell. And they're not going to be able to ignore us. One voice, sure. Millions of us. Impossibility. So we just have to keep the pressure on and we have to keep asking these kinds of questions. How the hell is a prosecutor who is supposedly going after Jeffrey Epstein, how is he not recusing himself or being replaced by his superiors, knowing that he had a relationship with one of Epstein's lawyers? It is ridiculous that this guy was not recused. All right, so our article today is from the New York Post headline, Epstein's attorney dated the prosecutor in trial where he got a sweetheart deal. I mean, how is that not
- [48:49]
Spinquest Announcer
looked
- [48:49]
Bobby Capucci
upon by the Department of Justice as something that is just unbelievably unacceptable? You can't have this guy as one of the prosecutors while at the same time dating one of Epstein's lawyers. There's no, what do you think? There's no conflict of interest there. How do we know that this dude isn't throwing sweetheart deals? Many of men have fallen under the spell of a beautiful woman. This article was posted, Excuse me, authored by Paula Frolique. It was a sweetheart deal that has baffled the world. How in 2008, Jeffrey Epstein was allowed to plead guilty to a lesser felony prostitution charge, register as a sex offender, and serve just 13 months in a county jail where he could come and go during the day despite several underage survivors testifying he raped them.
- [49:49]
Epstein Chronicles Host
So right off the bat you say
- [49:51]
Bobby Capucci
to yourself, what in the hell? This guy scored this sweetheart deal while at the same time one of the prosecutors was dating one of his attorneys. Right on the, right off the bat, that looks bad. And that's before you even add in all of the other stuff, right? So again, all these little nuggets, all these little pieces of information, all of these little puzzle pieces, when they're fitted together, they start. They start to draw a much darker picture than if we were just looking at these things as one offs, right? Every look, one offs happen in, in, in cases, right? Every now and then there's a coincidence. But this, this case is littered with all sorts of shit that is just completely and utterly backwards. The Department of Justice has been almost complicit in all of this, in my opinion, and there needs to be some repercussions for people who are involved. I have, I'm very, I'm very strong in that belief. It's now been revealed that one of Epstein's defense attorneys previously dated one of the top prosecutors on the deal. I don't even. Honestly, I don't even know what to say about that right now. It's just so, it's, it's so sad, I guess I should say, that the Department of Justice has sat on this information for 10 years. They've known this stuff for 10 years, and, and it's just coming out now. They're an embarrassment. And Bill Barr is the biggest embarrassment of all. I know a lot of you out there listening are, you know, under the impression that Bill Barr is pursuing people on behalf of justice, and that is not the case. Bill Barr is a political hack. He's a retread. He's been in Washington, D.C. forever. He is exactly what Trump was talking about when he talked about swamp monsters. But yet somehow Trump brings Barr in. It's all a shell game. I don't trust any of these people. The last politician I trusted was Ron Paul. Lillian Sanchez was a member of Epstein's defense team in 2008 when he was facing a potential federal indictment and life imprisonment for sexually abusing dozens of girls between 1999 and, and 2007. I mean, I know it's an uncomfortable, uncomfortable question to ask and all, but did this relationship have any sway on
- [52:31]
Epstein Chronicles Host
what Mr. Menshel did?
- [52:32]
Bobby Capucci
Did it have any. Were there any. Was there any pressure by Ms. Sanchez to get a favorable deal for her client? Look, we know that stuff like that occurs. We know that people like Menshell who get caught up in a relationship with a beautiful young woman can easily be manipulated. Now, again, I'm not saying that occurred. I don't know. I wasn't there. I wasn't hanging out with them while they were talking about, you know, whatever it is they're talking about. But I think that when you look at everything that went on in this case, there are so many unanswered questions that we can't leave any avenue unexplored. Sanchez had also dated Matthew Menshell, one of the prosecutors who worked on the plea deal. So this, this Ms. Sanchez has quite the bit of dating going on in her realm of work. Me personally, Yeah, I don't think it's a good idea to be dipping the old pen in Co. Inc. If you get my drift. And that's in any sort of situation. Nevermind a job like this where you're dealing with serious, serious matters. We're dealing with Jeffrey Epstein, for Lord's sake. And this lady, who is one of his attorneys is having an affair with a prosecutor and someone involved in the plea deal. How many people is this lady having an affair with? Is it all a coincidence or was she targeting these people?
- [54:13]
Epstein Chronicles Host
Is your.
- [54:14]
Bobby Capucci
The romance came to light after the Justice Department Office of Professional Responsibility, OPR issued a report this week slamming the Florida prosecutors for poor judgment and the Pedopurvs deal. Poor judgment is absolutely a understatement. Okay? Poor judgment. This was dereliction of duty. I got your poor judgment. As Tony Soprano would say, I got your poor judgment right here in my ass. I mean, are you kidding me right now? Sanchez and Manchell dated in 2003 when they were both employed at the Southern District of Florida's U.S. attorney's office. They later broke up but never disclosed the relationship while both worked on the Epstein deal. Bam. Right there. That alone should get the deal thrown out. Folks. I'm telling you right now, with all of this stuff that's coming out, the 11th Circuit Court, Circuit appeals court is going to have a field day with this shit. I said earlier that I thought it was a better than good chance that the non prosecution agreement agreement gets overturned. I. I'm accelerating that. I'm saying it's. It's a very good chance at this point because the 11th Circuit Circuit Court of Appeals is going to see all of this information too. They're going to have everything in front of them and they're going to make their decision based on. On everything that has been presented to them and everything that could be found by their clerks or whatever the hell they have going on. But the point is, this is really bad for the prosecutor's office. And while they might not face sanctions by the Department of Justice, I have a funny feeling the 11th Circuit is going to come down hard with an iron fist on these people hanging out
- [56:02]
Spinquest Promo Voice
at the pool is Great. Relaxing and playing Vegas style games on my phone at the same time. Drink in one hand and a blackjack in the other. It's all at spinquest. Over a thousand games, including your favorite slots and table games. Be cool with this summer special. New players get $30 coin packs for
- [56:21]
Spinquest Announcer
10@Spinquest.com SpinQuest is a free to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
- [56:33]
Bobby Capucci
The report says Manchel had left the office before the Epstein case was resolved. Menschel told Justice Department investigators during the probe that his relationship with Sanchez had no impact on his handling of the case. Oh, yeah, I'm sure had no handling at all. You're just. You could never fall to the charms of a woman, huh, Mr. Menschel? You're just better than the rest of us, obviously. Give me a break. We all know that Jeffrey Epstein was running a honey trap. This could have just been another portion of that honey trap, another way to pierce the veil and get somebody on the inside.
- [57:11]
Lapsed Fan Podcast Host
What?
- [57:11]
Epstein Chronicles Host
Where?
- [57:12]
Bobby Capucci
We don't think that. That Epstein and his people are that devious. Come on, folks, this is exactly what they do. This is in their wheelhouse. So Mr. Menshell here, he should be brought under oath and he should have to talk about what occurred because I have a sneaking suspicion that he has not been too forthright about his tryst with Ms. Sanchez here. Letting a well connected billionaire get away with child rape and international sex trafficking isn't poor judgment. It is a disgusting failure. Senator Ben Sasse said in a statement released on Thursday. Americans ought to be enraged. Epstein should be rotting behind bars today. But the just us department failed Epstein survivors at every turn.
- [57:58]
Epstein Chronicles Host
We.
- [57:58]
Bobby Capucci
Well, Mr. Sass, I'm here to report to you, sir. The Americans are enraged. And guess what? You're in a position to do something about it. So do you want to become a hero in this story? Do you want to become somebody that both sides of the aisle can look up to, like the old days when we actually, we actually had a political system that worked. If that's who you want to be, Mr. Sass, now's the time. Step forward, demand hearings and demand that these people be brought to justice. Epstein was found hanging in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional center in Manhattan last August while awaiting trial on new sex trafficking charges. You see how the Post doesn't say, oh, he committed suicide. And if you notice, certain outlets don't come out and say, well, he committed suicide. They'll say found hanging in his cell or found dead in his cell. And. And I think that that is good quality journalism because at the end of the day, we don't know what happened in that cell. So to assert that he definitely hung himself, or to assert that he was definitely murdered, we just don't have all of those details yet. But it is something that needs to be discussed, obviously. Now I think that Ben Sasse getting sassy about all of this is a definite good thing. It's a step in the right direction, but they need to be more forceful. The Congress, the Senate, they need to come out and they need to take a stand against this shit and let people like Epstein and those who were running this operation behind the scenes, those who were working with Epstein and those who were financing Epstein, that this shit is never going to happen again in this country. And if you took part in this, if you enabled this, if you were involved with Jeffrey Epstein financially, then you are in the crosshairs as well. That is a message that needs to be sent. It needs to be sent strongly and it needs to be sent now. If you'd like to contact me, you could do that@bobby capuchirotonmail.com that's B O B B Y C A P U c c I protonmail.com youm can also find me on Twitter at Bobby Cap Ucci all of the links that go with this episode can be found in the description box.
- [60:26]
Spinquest Promo Voice
Hanging out at the pool is great. Relaxing and playing Vegas style games on my phone at the same time. Drink in one hand and a blackjack in the other. It's all at Spinquest. Over a thousand games including your favorite slots and table games. Be cool with this summer special. New players get $30 coin packs for 10 at spinquest. Com.
- [60:49]
Spinquest Announcer
Spinquest is a free to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.