← The Epstein Chronicles
The Epstein Chronicles
More Peter Mandelson Files On The Way And Epstein's Alleged DNA Vault (6/1/26)
00:13:25
The second batch of documents tied to Lord Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the UK ambassador to the United States is set to be published, with officials describing it as one of the largest document releases ever laid before Parliament. The files...
Loading summary
Transcript1 lines
- [00:00]
A
What's up everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. In this episode we have two articles that we're going to get to. And the first one talks about Jeffrey Epstein and the preservation of his sperm. And the second story has to do with a second batch of information coming out over in the UK about Peter Mandelson and how some new information, new documents are now coming out and how it's going to be a gigantic headache for Akira Starmer who's already under fire. And at some point you have to think that the straw that breaks the camel's back is coming. How long can this guy survive? And of course I mean that politically speaking, but when you're in a situation like he's in, it is fraught with danger. And that's because everybody's looking to knock you off your perch. And usually the idea is is to avoid giving people inroads. But it seems like every time we turn around there's another problem that Kira Starmer is in the middle of. And I just don't know how much longer that can go on. And depending on what's in these files, it might be the tipping point. So that said, why don't we dive into this article from BBC and let's see what they have to say about this second batch of Mandelson files Headline second batch of Mandelson files to be published on Monday. The author of this article is Joe Pike. The second tranche of documents relating to Lord Mandelson's appointment as UK ambassador to the US will be published on Monday. Three sources involved in the process have told the BBC. While no. 10 has refused to confirm the publication date, a government spokesperson said the latest batch will be among the largest publications ever laid in Parliament. That's pretty significant and it's a pretty big deal. I mean, the curtain's getting pulled back over in the UK right now and somebody like Mandelson getting exposed is gigantic news. We're not talking about some Neo fight in English politics or some up jump lord. We're talking about somebody that has been very high placed for a very long time in the upper crust of British society. And this is the man that was hand picked by Starmer. And now you have all of this controversy coming out that everybody knew about, but it's becoming public now. And of course Starmer, he's left holding the bag. But in my opinion, it's by his own design. He knew that Mandelson was not a good guy. He knew that Mandelson had a gigantically long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein for years and years and years, and they chose to appoint him anyway. And the reason that they chose to appoint him is because they didn't care. They didn't care until you found out, but now that you know. Well, of course we've always cared about this and we would never be associated with Jeffrey Epstein. And that's always the COVID story that always comes after they've already been outed. Right, look, we caught you. We know that you're a scumbag and we know that everything you told us about your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was a lie. And I think that's the point that the public's at. I think the public overall has just had enough of these kinds of people. The sort of people that get away with whatever, whenever, however they want. Lord Mandelson was sacked as Ambassador last year after the emergence of new revelations about the extent of his relationship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In February, MPS voted to force the government to publish all papers relating to the appointment through a humble address, which is a parliamentary process. And of course, over in the uk, they have a different system of government and that system includes the House of the Lords and the House of the Commons, and those two chambers make up their version of Congress, but it's called Parliament. And the one thing that I enjoy about English politics is how combative it gets during some of these sessions. They really call each other out, they talk a lot of shit, and I find it entertaining, to be honest with you. Now, of course, the topics were very serious, but it's always funny to watch these people talk shit to each other. The government initially opposed the motion, arguing that it did not want to publish material that could damage national security or diplomatic relations. Where have we heard that before? National security, huh? Why would Epstein have anything to do with anybody's national security if he's just some lone wolf? Of course. But in a last minute compromise, the government agreed to first send sensitive documents to the Intelligence and Security Committee, which would decide what could and could not be published. Here's an idea. It should all be published, all of it. Why are you gatekeeping the information? And the fact that they went kicking and screaming to try and defend that information from ever being released is a big, gigantic. Tell to me if you wanted to end this, if you wanted to bring this to completion, you would be transparent, you would release everything you have and then you would go before Congress, before the American people and explain it in detail. But that was never the goal. The goal was to flood the zone, have a bunch of BS added into the actual facts. That way they can call the whole thing a hoax. And a whole hell of a lot of people fell for that nonsense. The first tranche of document was published in March. They showed Prime Minister Keir Starmer was advised that Lord Mandelson's relationship with Epstein posed a general reputational risk ahead of his confirmation as U.S. ambassador. You mean to tell me that the English can find a terrorist in the middle of Tora Bora, but they had no idea that Peter Mandelson was close to Jeffrey Epstein and that he was a reputational risk? Give me a break. Keir Starmer knew exactly what Mandelson was and he knew exactly what Jeffrey Epstein was and he chose to appoint them anyway. That's the whole story. Sir Akira's National Security Adviser, Jonathan Powell, also said he found the appointment of Lord Mandelson weirdly rushed. The government spokesperson said they were committed to complying with the humble address in full and adding, that reflects the transparent and thorough process that we have followed. The release of documents comes as Parliament returns on Monday after a week's recess. And I think it's going to be interesting to see what gets released and just how enlightening it all is, because when it comes to Epstein and the uk, I think we've only scratched the surface. I think there's a lot more here to uncover and a lot more people that were involved one way or the other. The government has insisted that all relevant documents will be published, except if the Metropolitan Police has requested any be held back while they conduct their investigation. Lord Mandelson's vetting file will not be included. It's understood that the Met Police have asked for it to be held back while they investigate him on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He is denied wrongdoing. I don't believe a word that Peter Mandelson says, and I think that he was probably passing information onto other people besides Epstein. These are people that are only interested in one thing. Self. All these people. And I think most of us understood that previously, but now we're actually seeing the corruption unfold in real time. And as we continue to peel back the layers, the more obvious it becomes. The whole entire thing is corrupted and rotted from the top down. Some documents will be redacted on national security or international relation grounds or to remove the names of junior officials. Sir Keir announced he would be appointing Lord Mandelson to the Washington position in December 2024, saying he would bring unrivaled experience to the role. Well, I guess if you want to Deal with the Epstein administration, you might as well get an Epstein type of dude. Maybe that was the thinking. Hey, look, we gotta deal with Trump and all of his goons, so maybe we'll send over one of Epstein's buddies that might, you know, bridge the gap. And look, I'm only half kidding when I say that. However, nine months later, Mandelson was sacked after further revelations came to light about his long standing friendship with Epstein. Lord Mandelson has said his friendship with Epstein was a terrible mistake, but insisted he never saw anything in Epstein's life that would give him any reason to suspect what this evil monster was doing. Oh, of course not. I had no idea. You just got arrested the first time around for soliciting a child, but no big deal. Ah, come on. The prosecutors told us that she was 17 years old and 10 months, so she was basically an adult. That's the reasoning that they give. That's the thought pattern of these sick degenerate fucks. And because of that, well, Lord Mandelson thought that Epstein was still a great guy. Well, that and the checks he was getting from him. MPs from across the parties have been highly critical of the Prime Minister's decision to give Lord Mandelson the job. Well, yeah. Why in the hell would you give this guy the job? It makes no sense. You mean to tell me in the great country of the UK there's not anybody qualified to take that position? Lord Mandelson was the only game in town. The peer is under criminal investigation over allegations of misconduct in public office and has repeatedly let it be known that he believes he has not acted criminally, did not act for personal gain, and is cooperating with the police. How come none of these people were cooperating with the police before they were under investigation? If you had any information about Jeffrey Epstein whatsoever, why didn't you bring it forward? Why not contact the authorities and say, look, this is what I have, this is what I know, I'd love to talk to you. The problem is all these people thought this was going away. They thought they would never have to answer for this. They thought that those emails would never see the light of day. They were wrong. And now they're scrambling to try and create narratives. But those narratives are being destroyed and not by counter narratives, but by the facts. And the fact is, Keir Starmer should have never appointed Peter Mandelson in the first place. Alright, moving on to the second story, and this one was published by Raw. And the headline, Epstein's dark dream of spreading his DNA may outlive him. This article was authored by Travis Geddes. Newly released files reveal that Jeffrey Epstein quietly banked his sperm for years before his 2019 death and explicitly arranged for it to remain preserved rather than be destroyed if he died, raising urgent legal and ethical questions that remain unanswered. If any of that shit exists, it should be burned. Yesterday, documents in the Department of Justice files show the late sex offender deposited sperm with California Cryobank before October 2012 and signed a renewed storage contract in May of 2016. That contract stipulated that upon his death, the samples would fall under the control of his estate or legal representative, reported the New York Times. Well, I'm sure that Alan Dershowitz would love to have that. A nice little memento to his buddy. The current whereabouts of the samples are unclear. Cooper Companies, which acquired California Cryobank in 2021, stated only that the bank does not currently store any samples associated with Jeffrey Epstein, declining to elaborate. Epstein's estate has not responded to requests for comment. Well, why would they? What are they going to say? Oh, we got Jeffy's little swimmers here like some betta fish in a little tank? I mean, what? The revelation takes on a darker dimension given statements from people close to Epstein who said he harbored ambitions of spreading his DNA while widely by impregnating women in his New Mexico ranch. That's true. He certainly wanted to do that. We've heard that from a lot of people. Not just one or two, a lot. Medical records in the files show he was treated for low testosterone and was prescribed Clomid, a drug that can boost sperm count, suggesting a preoccupation with his fertility in the years before his death. Legal experts say jurisdiction over the samples would likely fall under U.S. virgin Islands law where Epstein's estates being administered. His trust document makes no specific mention of the bank's sperm, leaving its fate legally ambiguous. Bioethics scholars are divided over whether sperm bank should have accepted samples from a convicted sex offender in the first place. A debate the files have now thrust back into the spotlight. I mean, why would you want to accept anything from Jeffrey Epstein? Oh, that's right, Money. Got it. The same reason everybody else accepted everything else. Epstein died by suicide in a Manhattan jail in 2019, allegedly while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. Alright, so what do you folks think? Do you think that Mandelson is going to be the downfall of cure Starmer? Or do you think that Kira Starmer finds a way to keep himself at 10 Downing Street. Shoot me some emails and let me know what you think. All the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.