
A newly surfaced photograph from Department of Justice files shows former Prince Andrew—now Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor—sitting barefoot in a bathrobe alongside Jeffrey Epstein and British politician Peter Mandelson at a wooden table, believed to be on...
Loading summary
A
Wait, you don't need an hour to burn calories. TikTok has short workouts that get your heart rate up fast. Download now and get moving. Hate cleaning, Hate scrubbing, hate dishwashing. Bro, we got you millions of videos about smart cleaning hacks will make your chores feel like a breeze. Download TikTok and check it out.
B
What's up, everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. As if things couldn't get worse for the artist formerly known as Prince Andrew, he's now been outed and caught barefoot in a bathrobe with Jeffrey Epstein in a new photo that surfaced from their time together in Martha's Vineyard. Now, of course, the palace is already distancing themselves from this, saying that he's no longer a working royal and they have nothing to do with Prince Andrew or his. But I think it just, once again, points to the fact that Andrew is a liar. I mean, everything he said about Jeffrey Epstein was a lie, and I truly believe that. And I think everything that was said about him, meaning Prince Andrew, by Virginia and by others, is true. And the more evidence that comes out, the more obvious that becomes. So imagine this dude sitting there during that BBC interview trying to us the way he did. And of course, anybody with a brain in their head knew that he was lying at the time. But now it's not only speculation, it's a fact. And when it comes to Andrew and the situation that he's currently in, this is the kind of thing that they build cases on. When I talk about circumstantial evidence, this is what I mean. And I think just about everybody understands that once an investigation into you is initiated, it doesn't stop with the things that they were looking for initially. They're going to follow every thread, they're going to open every door, and if you committed crimes, they're going to find them. So in this article from Fox News, we're going to talk a little bit more about the gigantic hole that Prince Andrew continues to dig for himself. This article was authored by Lauren Overholtz. A new photo of former Prince Andrew and British diplomat Peter Mandelson spending time with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein has emerged in the latest investigation files. Well, here's the good news. Maybe they can share a cell at Belmarsh. Isn't that where the English send the worst of the worst? You know, like the Canaan Cartel and, well, they can spend some time together in that cell and they can reminisce over the great times they had with their buddy Jeffrey Epstein. Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor and Mandelson can be seen barefoot and wearing white bathrobes while chatting with Epstein at a wooden table. The photo released by the Department of Justice and is believed to have been taken sometime in 1999 or 2000 as the men spent time at Martha's Vineyard. Yo, maybe it's just me, but whenever I've been on a vacation with my buddies, I don't show up in my bathrobe. I don't sit around the table drinking my coffee in my bathrobe. I'm a grown adult. I have, you know, my own hotel room. I take a shower, comb my hair, brush my chompers, you know, get ready for the day. Who the is going to sit around with their buddies in bathrobes up in Martha's Vineyard? I mean, maybe it's just me, but I'm not trying to sit around and get my morning started in a bathrobe with my two buddies. The American flag mug sat on the table between the three men. Fox News Digital has reached out to representatives for Andrew and Mandelson for a comment. A spokesperson for Buckingham palace previously told Fox News Digital they don't answer for Andrew and he's no longer a working royal. The problem with that is it's too little, too late. They could have safeguarded the monarchy a long time ago when all of this first started breaking and it was obvious that there was a ton of evidence, they should have jettisoned him then. They should have put his ass in the Tower of London. But instead, at the Queen's behest, they all rallied around them and Prince Andrew was enabled and he was allowed to continue dragging the monarchy through the mud. Andrew's photo with Epstein adds to mounting evidence of the former prince's ties to the millionaire who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. You know, I have a funny feeling that Ms. Lauren Overholtz wasn't so quick to agree with the DOJ when Donald Trump wasn't president. Notice how that works? Everybody wants to rage against a machine when their guy's not in office. Nothing says revolutionary like raging against half the machine. British authorities arrested Andrew in February on suspicion of misconduct and public office. He's been accused of sharing confidential trade information with Epstein. Emails released by the DOJ as part of the Epstein files appear to show former Prince Andrew sharing reports of official trade visits with a disgraced financier. One email showed Andrew allegedly sent Epstein the information five minutes after he received it. So, like again, even if you don't believe the sex trafficking or that Andrew was involved in abuse? How do you come to terms with this? How do you rationalize this behavior and try to smooth it over? Because I don't think that's possible. Right? I really don't think that you can smooth that over. I don't think that you can rationalize it. You handed that information over to somebody that wasn't cleared to have that level of information. Now, if you or I did that, forget it, we'd be at some federal facility breaking rocks on the chain gang. Other police forces in the UK are also conducting their own investigation into Andrew and his ties to Epstein. The Metropolitan Police is investigating allegations that London airports may have been used to facilitate human trafficking and sexual exploitation. Oh, there's no doubt. Is that even a debate? We're actually having a debate about that because there is zero doubt that those airports were used as trafficking hubs. And not only that, I'd say that at least a portion of those girls and women were being abused inside the borders of the uk. So, again, this is not just an American problem, this is a problem for all of us. Separately, the Met is identifying and contacting former and serving officers who may have worked closely in protection capacity with Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, the Metropolitan Police said in a statement previously obtained by Fox News Digital. Now, I don't know how much I trust the Met Police, considering they've had how many investigations open and how many investigations closed when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein and and is bullshit in the uk. So I don't know how much trust I have. But maybe because this is so mainstream now, things will be different. They won't be able to get away with it, and that's because people like you won't allow it. Before, there wasn't enough of us, right? Our voice wasn't strong enough, but now it's different. They're paying attention and they're listening to what you have to say. And that's why you see this action against Andrew and Lord Mandelson. They've been asked to consider carefully whether anything they saw or heard during that period of service may be relevant to our ongoing reviews and to share any information that could assist us. The statement continued. Oh, I'm sure they have information. The problem is getting them to sit down to divulge it. They're not going to incriminate themselves, like I've said about other people. Do you really think people like Lord Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten Windsor are going to incriminate themselves? Well, maybe Andrew the dude's an absolute moron. But Lord Mandelson, I have my doubts. And if you don't think he's about to dig his heels in and fight back, you're crazy. He most certainly will. How that's gonna end up, I have no idea. I'm not locked in enough to the English legal system to know all the nuances or the twists and turns, but I know that both of these dudes are really up against it. And that's because there is actionable intelligence here, right? We know the emails were sent, we know the confidential information was given, and we know who divulged it. So it would seem to me that at least this part of it is, is pretty clear cut. And I think that's why you see the authorities acting the way they are in the uk. They can't ignore it anymore and they can't deny that it's happening or happened. While we are aware of the extensive media reporting and commentary about this matter, as of today, no new criminal allegations have been made to the Met regarding sexual offenses said to have occurred within our jurisdiction. We continue to urge anyone with New Orleans or relevant information to come forward. All allegations will be taken seriously and as with any matter, any information received will be assessed and investigated where appropriate. Now that sounds great, but the problem is I don't believe them. I really don't believe that Scotland Yard especially cares about what happened here. And that's because their behavior in the past. Now of course that doesn't automatically mean that not going to do the right thing here, but I think that we should be skeptical and we should hold their feet to the fire to make sure that action is taken. In 2025, it came to light that former Prince Andrew emailed Epstein on February 28, 2011, more than two months after he had told the BBC he cut off all contact with a disgraced financier. Wait a minute. Andrew lied? Come on. There's no way that Prince Andrew, the moral pillar of the community, would ever lie to us, right? Months later, Andrew revealed he was giving up his royal titles, including the Duke of York. King Charles III quickly stripped Andrew of remaining titles, including Prince. He became Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. King Charles also kicked his brother and of Royal Lodge prior to his arrest. And at this point, the fall of Prince Andrew is almost complete. I mean, being arrested as a monarch's son, not exactly the type of thing you see over in the UK on a daily basis. So now the question becomes, what happens next? Do the UK authorities pursue this and hold Prince Andrew and Lord Mandelson accountable, or does it all just get swept under the rug, as we have seen so many times in past scandals? And as of now, that's yet to be determined. But like usual, we'll keep an eye on things. And when we have some more information about the Joe Exotic of the Windsor family, Peter Mandelson, and their situation over in the uk, we'll get it added to the catalog. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.
Episode: Photo Shows Prince Andrew, Epstein, and Peter Mandelson Together on Martha’s Vineyard
Host: Bobby Capucci
Date: June 3, 2026
In this episode, Bobby Capucci dives into the recent revelations from the Epstein files—specifically, a newly released photo showing Prince Andrew, Peter Mandelson, and Jeffrey Epstein in bathrobes at Martha’s Vineyard. Capucci discusses the ongoing implications for Prince Andrew and the British establishment, highlighting mounting evidence of Andrew’s close associations with Epstein and the broader questions of accountability for elites entangled in Epstein’s criminal network. The episode scrutinizes both legal investigations and public responses, all while maintaining the host's signature tone of skepticism and irreverence.
Bathrobes at Martha’s Vineyard:
Capucci emphasizes the unusual and informal setting depicted in the photo—three powerful men, all barefoot and in bathrobes, chatting around a wooden table, symbolizing their close personal ties.
"Whenever I've been on a vacation with my buddies, I don't show up in my bathrobe. ... Who ... is going to sit around with their buddies in bathrobes up in Martha's Vineyard?" (03:52)
Released by the DOJ:
The photo, believed to be from 1999 or 2000, was published as part of ongoing investigation files, further linking Prince Andrew and Mandelson to Epstein.
Ongoing Lies and Irrefutable Evidence:
Capucci criticizes Prince Andrew’s history of denials regarding Epstein.
"Everything he said about Jeffrey Epstein was a lie, and I truly believe that. ... The more evidence that comes out, the more obvious that becomes." (01:13)
The host references the infamous BBC interview, noting that Andrew's repeated claims of innocence are now disproven by mounting evidence.
Official Distancing by the Palace:
The palace now claims Andrew is "no longer a working royal," but Capucci calls this response inadequate and too late.
"They could have safeguarded the monarchy a long time ago when all of this first started breaking... they should have put his ass in the Tower of London. But instead ... Prince Andrew was enabled and ... allowed to continue dragging the monarchy through the mud." (05:00)
Circumstantial Evidence Building a Case:
Capucci outlines how this photo and other evidence could be used to build a legal case, pointing out that investigations often go beyond initial allegations.
Email Evidence:
Newly released DOJ emails suggest Andrew shared confidential trade visit reports with Epstein, sometimes within minutes of receiving them.
"Even if you don't believe the sex trafficking or that Andrew was involved in abuse? How do you come to terms with this? ... You handed that information over to somebody that wasn’t cleared..." (07:08)
Capucci underscores that such actions are serious crimes for ordinary citizens.
Investigations into Human Trafficking:
The Metropolitan Police’s ongoing inquiries now include reviewing whether London airports were used as trafficking hubs and whether officers assigned to Andrew observed inappropriate or illegal activities.
"There's zero doubt that those airports were used as trafficking hubs. ... A portion of those girls and women were being abused inside the borders of the UK." (09:30)
Skepticism Toward Authorities:
Given previous failures to investigate Epstein’s UK activities, Capucci remains doubtful that Scotland Yard or the Met Police will deliver justice but acknowledges increased public pressure might force action.
"I don't know how much I trust the Met Police, considering they've had how many investigations open and how many ... closed when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein ..." (10:54)
Andrew’s Legal and Royal Status:
Details on Andrew’s arrest in February, the removal of his royal titles, and King Charles III’s severing of remaining ties are highlighted as indicators of his disgrace and isolation.
"He became Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. King Charles also kicked his brother out of Royal Lodge prior to his arrest. ... The fall of Prince Andrew is almost complete." (16:22)
Will Accountability Follow?
The episode concludes with open questions about whether Andrew and Mandelson will truly be held responsible or whether the scandal will be quietly buried, as has historically happened with establishment figures.
"Imagine this dude sitting there during that BBC interview trying to ... us the way he did. And of course, anybody with a brain in their head knew that he was lying at the time. But now it's not only speculation, it's a fact." (01:40)
"If you or I did that, forget it, we'd be at some federal facility breaking rocks on the chain gang." (08:10)
"While we are aware of the extensive media reporting and commentary about this matter.... Now that sounds great, but the problem is I don't believe them. I really don't believe that Scotland Yard especially cares about what happened here. And that's because their behavior in the past." (13:46)
"They can't ignore it anymore and they can't deny that it's happening or happened. ... They're paying attention and they're listening to what you have to say. And that's why you see this action against Andrew and Lord Mandelson." (12:45)
In classic Epstein Chronicles fashion, Bobby Capucci offers a sharp, unfiltered examination of the latest evidence tying Prince Andrew and Peter Mandelson to Jeffrey Epstein, using newly surfaced photos and email records as a launchpad into broader questions of institutional complicity and accountability. Capucci’s skepticism of official narratives, colorful commentary, and calls for public vigilance make it clear that while the scandal intensifies, only sustained pressure will ensure real consequences for those involved.
For further details and case documents, refer to the episode description box.