← The Epstein Chronicles
The Epstein Chronicles
Sixty UK Landings: How Did Jeffrey Epstein Move Women Through British Airspace Unchecked?
00:19:07
According to newly surfaced documents and flight records, Jeffrey Epstein continued to traffic women through British airports and even military airfields up until a month before his arrest in July 2019. Analysis of his private jet’s movements shows...
Loading summary
Transcript1 lines
- [00:00]
A
What's up, everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. I don't think there's any doubt at this point that Jeffrey Epstein was trafficking women. Now, you can argue the extent of that trafficking and the ages of the girls and women being trafficked, but the fact that he was trafficking women and young girls, it's not even debatable. I mean, we've heard about the USVI and how people knew that Epstein was still bringing young girls and children to the island. And now we're hearing about the same exact thing in airports in the uk. And according to a new report, Epstein traffic women through British airports until just a month before his arrest. So he was doing this the whole entire time. And I want you to keep in mind that Scotland Yard knew about all this and they ignored it. So it's not just here in America. Law enforcement in the UK ignored all of this too. They had the information, they had the facts, they had the evidence. What they didn't have was the willpower. And at the time when Scotland Yard said it wasn't going to investigate any further and when it shut down the investigations, I told you that that was going to come back to haunt them. And here we are. Because this kind of thing doesn't stay buried forever. People talk, people come forward. And now we have a bunch of files that are being dumped. And according to the files, there's no doubt that Jeffrey Epstein was trafficking women, was trafficking girls and that he was using places like the UK as a hub. So in this episode, we're going to dive into an article that was published by the Daily Mail and the headline, jeffrey Epstein traffic women through British airports. And until just one month before his 2019 arrest, and he took more than 60 flights, including many to RAF bases. So this is kind of building on what we were talking about previously about the investigation that was launched in the uk when it comes to Epstein and the airports, well, they're making some progress and they've unearthed some new documents that really slammed the point home. This article was authored by Shannon McCoogan. Jeffrey Epstein Traffic women through British airports until a month before his arrest in 2019. The Epstein files suggest booking records, flight logs as well as fuel receipts. A part of the trove of documents released by the Department of Justice show the pedophile financier flew to and from Britain over 60 times. And the disgraced financier, 66, book commercial flights for women in and out of the UK just a month before his arrest in 2019. I'm sure they were coming there to just hang out. They were going to watch tv. I hear that they were going to do a marathon of Friends. Oh, what, that. That's not what they're doing over at Epstein's house. I mean, listening to some of these people, you would think that that's all that's going on. He's mentoring them. Jeffrey Epstein's a great steward of their future. Now, of course, that's a bit hyperbolic, but that's pretty much the point that we're coming to. And I find it sick and disgusting, considering all the facts that are available. And even if you don't believe the most salacious stuff, how is it that you can deny that this kind of thing was happening? Because it most certainly was. And now we have a lot of documentation to prove it. And that mountain of evidence continues to grow. And I think that this investigation in the UK will provide some more details about how this trafficking operation was being run, because we know that they were running dummy flights through the UK to throw the investigators off and to muddle up the flight logs. But I'm sure they were just doing that because, you know, it was fun for them. It was enjoyable. I'm sure there were no devious intentions behind it. Hell, Jeffrey Epstein, like we stated earlier, great guy, right? It's understood that six police forces are probing whether victims were trafficked on the financier's private plane in and out of UK airports as well as RAF bases. Among RAF bases included in the investigation is North Holt, a station in Ruslip, One West London, which was instrumental in the country's defense during the Battle of Britain and World War II. Gordon Brown has requested the six police forces assess whether Andrew Mountbatten Windsor utilized the air force for trips linked to Epstein. Probably a good idea. The dude was on the public dime. What, he shouldn't have any accountability. I mean, it would be bad enough as a private citizen doing this or just as a prince, but as the trade envoy passing secrets. And to Jeffrey Epstein, not exactly a good look. And the kind of thing that if you're a regular person, you end up under the jail for. The former Labor Prime Minister has handed a file of evidence regarding flights to forces whose policing authority boundaries cover relevant airports where the sex offender's jet may have landed. Police forces included are a Metropolitan Police, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley, Norfolk and Bedfordshire constabularies which cover Gatwick, Heathrow, Luton, RAF Horsam and RAF Marsham between them. So this is a serious investigation, and they're taking it very, very serious. As far as Jeffrey Epstein utilizing military bases and other airports to traffic girls. And what do you know? An actual investigation's been launched. Hell, we wouldn't even know what that is here in America. I might drop dead of a heart attack if we did the same. You mean to tell me with all the evidence we have, there's not enough for one single investigation here in America and to anybody. Is that really what you're telling me? And of course, that goes directly to the people who are calling this a moral panic. If it was a moral panic, wouldn't there be consequences? And I don't mean people calling you out for your bullshit. I mean real consequences, like Andrew's facing. But we don't see that here in America, do we? One hell of a moral panic. And isn't it odd those very people that cry about moral panics never have anything to say about the people who were abused. Documents indicate the pedophile's plane landed at RAF Northolt in 2015. Andrew has always denied any wrongdoing. Epstein's associates organized journeys from Heathrow to New York and back for a Russian woman whose name has been removed from the records on June 1 and June 9. I'm sure she just showed up for a shopping spree. I'm sure that that woman, that girl, whatever. Wasn't abused, because, you know, none of that was happening. Epstein didn't traffic girls, stupid. The pedophile's assistant, Leslie Groff, who asked an Amex concierge and account manager to add an unreserved hotel record to an itinerary. And when she replied it could be too late to make the booking as well as cancel it, Groff responded, can you just type up a hotel? And in an itinerary, the account manager later discovered a hotel which could do same day cancellations, which Epstein's assistant answered, just add it to the itinerary. I will cancel tomorrow morning. Grof also requested the same concierge arrange a decoy flight for a woman journeying to Miami in 2016. The email read, no return for this flight. This is a decoy flight. She'll not really take it, but she needs to show an itinerary for this flight. Can you put something together for me? Yo, Leslie Groff needs to be investigated. She was right in the middle of all of this. And if you have a conspiracy or RICO case, even if you're the one answering the phones and putting things into motion, you're responsible. A journey departing from Rome and landing in London City Airport was suggested, to which she answered, let me find out if the Fake ticket can show. London City lawyers representing Groff have previously stated Epstein's former assistant had never witnessed anything improper or illegal. Oh, not at all. But she engaged in some that was improper and illegal. That's my opinion. The recent findings were lambasted as scandalous by Nazir Afzal, former Chief Crown Prosecutor. Time and time again, when police have been asked to investigate Epstein in respect to sexual abuse and trafficking. We've been told that a review found no need, he told the Times. That's what I'm saying. This is an international cover up and how people are missing it is beyond me. It is absolutely insane how long this has been covered up and just how many pieces were in motion to make sure that it stayed that way. How's it then possible for the Times and others to uncover vital, incriminating evidence when a police review found no need to find it? Well, they didn't look. There was no real investigation. And that's why people who argue that Jeffrey Epstein was never charged or convicted, I should say, with sex trafficking are arguing from a place perched in dishonesty. They're not serious about the debate. They. They're not serious about the conversation and they're not serious about moving this forward. They're serious about trying to be right. But unfortunately for them, it'll never happen because the truth is what the truth is and the facts are the facts. The 64 year old behind the prosecution of grooming gangs in Northern England said in the last week. We have seen that when the state is the alleged victim, it can move at pace. But when the alleged victim is a woman, it finds an excuse not to move at all. It comes as new documents indicate Epstein's private plane had arrived at RAF Northolt in 2015, two years later than was known. Records in the Epstein file show a receipt for a Gulfstream jet refueling at an RAF base on May 8, 2015, with journeys to North Holt having previously been noted in 2013. No explanation, no reason why, nobody coming forward and the police telling us there's nothing here to see, nothing to investigate, that the Epstein matter is closed over in the uk. Well, whoever made those decisions, they might be in for it because it looks to me that the UK is now taking this seriously and I hope that they do. Before he was jailed in 2008 after being found guilty of sex offenses, Epstein made several journeys to and from UK airports on his Boeing 727. Most of his journeys were back and forth from Luton and continued following his release in 2009, but at a lower rate. The Financier and Ghislaine Maxwell, his assistant and a woman traveled from Luton to Paris in December of 2000. Tom Pritzker, an American businessman, was picked up by Epstein the following day as well as an individual referenced as one female in flight logs. Tom Pritzker, just another man who was credibly accused by Virginia Roberts who was left out of the conversation for all these years. Just like George Mitchell, just like Bill Richardson and a whole host of other people. I mean, Bill Pritzker should have been on the clock a long ass time ago. The second Virginia said what she said about him. There should have been an investigation at the very least. That doesn't mean you find him guilty. That doesn't mean you find enough evidence that you even indict, but at least have the investigation and a real one. I mean, am I crazy for calling for that? I guess so. Pritzker has not been accused of wrongdoing and previously said last month that he regretted his links with Epstein. In 2011, the Telegraph asked Epstein's representatives about the likelihood that Andrew aided in organizing the landing. The financier queried his pilot Larry Vasoski and went on to email Maxwell saying spoke to Larry. It's true. After Sandringham, the aircraft was moved to Norwich before it flew back to the US with a pit stop in Gander, Canada. Two days later in December of 2012, the financier's plane received extensive repairs at Stansted. Once fixed, Epstein flew a young Russian woman whose name was removed from the files to the U. S and again, I'm sure he was bringing her here for, you know, really wholesome purposes. He just wanted to help, man. Come on, don't you know Jeffrey Epstein? Misunderstood guy, hell of a fella. In his correspondence with aviation experts, Epstein asked for guidance on whether the woman could come into the UK before heading to the US Using a Russian passport. Other documents show the financier chartered a Cessna Citation jet to take him and the woman from Paris to Stansted but before they embarked on his plane to head to the U. S. 10 police forces are examining allegations in relation to Epstein as well as claims that he traffic girls to and from the UK it comes after Epstein blamed Charles on the very day Andrew was forced to step down as Britain's trade envoy. Emails revealed, well, that was the golden goose. He was getting all that inside information from Prince Andrew and once Charles put an end to it, well, that hurt Jeffrey Epstein's business dealings. Right. So he's gonna have something to say about it. On July 21, 2011 the day it was publicly announced that the then prince would quit his role as the UK's Special Representative for International Trade and Investment. The convicted sex offender wrote, I assume he knows that this is Charles doing. The message was sent in response to an associate who had told him, lots of TV coverage on PA and always big feature on you insane. It's understood that PA refers to Prince Andrew. Well, yeah, no shit. Who else is it gonna refer to at the time? Andrew had served as the UK Special Representative for International Trade and Investment for a decade from 2001 to 2011. The high profile role gave him access to senior government figures and powerful business leaders around the world. Yeah, that he grifted from, that he tried to ingratiate himself to, and in some cases passed on secret information. But sure, Prince Andrew, he's being persecuted. He stepped back from the post amid growing scrutiny and criticism over his continued relationship with Epstein, the U. S. Financier and convicted sex offender. A photograph of the pair walking together in New York had already made headlines in the months leading up to his departure, intensifying public pressure. The emails offer fragments of private conversations from the period when Andrew and Epstein's association was attracting global attention some 15 years ago. Not enough attention, did it? Because if it had the right attention and people really looked, they would have known. Or is it that they did know and they didn't care? Certainly something to ponder. Epstein spent much of the day emailing contacts about the news that Andrew had lost his official trade roll. In another message, Epstein wrote, I'm sure this is good for him. He will now be free. He also forwarded a news article about Andrew stepping down to Ghislaine Maxwell, who. Who replied simply, why? Epstein responded, I think he wants to make money. Andrew, now 66, was arrested last Thursday on suspicion of misconduct in public office after being accused of leaking secrets to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein while serving as the UK's trade envoy. And I think the evidence is solid. Now, of course, we have to have a full investigation, right? But so far the evidence looks very, very solid and I think that Prince Andrew has a lot to worry about. He was released under investigation after spending 11 hours in custody, and police last night confirmed they have concluded searches of his former Windsor mansion Royal Lodge. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor has always denied any wrongdoing. Meanwhile, the FBI has noted a series of omitted interviews include an unsubstantiated allegation that Donald Trump forced a victim of Epstein toward his exposed penis, which she subsequently bit. The bureau had conversations with the woman on four occasions, which began in 2019. However, she refused to cooperate with a possible probe into the US president, according to an email between FBI agents in July 2025. Well, why? And look, I'm not saying that it's true, but I want to see why. All of the evidence, why are you hiding it? The law doesn't say you can hide this or that after you decide what is damaging and what's not. The law calls for all of it to be released. So here's an idea. Follow the law. Trump has always denied any involvement or knowledge of the financier's crimes. The Department of Justice has also not answered queries from npr, as well as a number of Democrat senators who said the account is evidence that the trove of documents has been interfered with to protect the U.S. president. Look, that is not a crazy statement. What other reason could there be for them not to release this? They're obviously trying to protect Donald Trump, but that's not what the law calls for. The law states that people who are victims can have their names redacted, their information redacted, but not Donald Trump, and certainly not to the degree we see here. So it's going to be very interesting to see what the DOJ has to say and how they try and spin this as nothing more than just a simple mistake, because it's obviously a lot more than that. But as far as the UK goes and these airports, there's no doubt that that's what Jeffrey Epstein was doing. And the more evidence that comes out, the more undeniable that becomes. All right, folks, that's going to do it for this one. All the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.