← The Epstein Chronicles
The Epstein Chronicles
Why Is Melania Trump Talking About Epstein Now as the Administration Tries to Bury the Story (4/10/26)
00:25:15
Melania Trump’s denial leans heavily on a familiar playbook: minimize, distance, and reframe. By characterizing the allegations as smears, she sidesteps the more uncomfortable reality that Epstein’s network was built precisely on these “incidental”...
Loading summary
Transcript1 lines
- [00:00]
A
What's up, everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. For the past eight months or so, all we've heard from President Trump is that everybody should just move on from the Epstein files because it's just a gigantic hoax. And according to him, there's nothing left to see here. Well, maybe somebody should have told his wife, because yesterday Melania Trump acted as an arsonist and set fire to that whole entire narrative. Now, there's a lot to unpack because it's very odd that Melania would come out with this statement just out of the blue. And it leads me to believe that there's something else on the way, something damaging. What that might be, I don't know. Probably some kind of expose, some kind of story by a journalist who's putting the pieces together when it comes to Melania Trump and her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghis Maxwell. And it's not debatable. She most certainly had a relationship with them both. And I think that the only thing that's in dispute at this point is how deep those ties ran. But when you look at the email that was sent by Melania to Glenn Maxwell and then the response, it certainly looks to me like that's two friends having a nice little conversation, not acquaintances. I don't know about you, but I don't call people I don't really know pet names. I think that would be kind of weird, right? I just meet you at the bar, and the next time we talk, you have some kind of nickname for me, some kind of pet name. That's weird. I don't even know you. Why would you give me some kind of nickname? Now, on the flip side of that, you have a friend, people you've been around forever, you guys get comfortable, right? For instance, my friends, they call me Little Rob because my dad is Big Rob, and the homie F dog started calling us Little and Big Rob so that he could differentiate from us when we were hanging out. So my point is, when you're close with somebody, of course they're going to give you nicknames. They're going to call each other, you know, whatever they call each other, hey, dick bag, you know, scrotum sack, whatever it might be, because you guys are comfortable with each other, you're friends. But according to Melania Trump, her and Ghislaine Maxwell, they're not friends at all. And, you know, this email, it should just be ignored and not taken for what it is. That's what Melania Trump wants us to believe. But I don't believe that Because I don't believe that people send these kinds of emails if they're not close. Who ends an email with love Melania? I answer a lot of emails every day and the vast majority of them are from people that I've never met. I can assure you that I don't end any of those emails with love ya or love or anything like that. First of all, it would be weird. Second of all, I don't even know you. But Melania Trump, she has no problem ending the email that was sent in reply to Glenn Maxwell with a nice little Love Melania at the end of it. Yeah, you're gonna have to do better with the narrative because I don't believe that you weren't friends. And to that point, I don't think that this statement is coming out of the blue. There is something damaging that's on the way, in my opinion, and it has to be something that's pretty big if it would necessitate her getting out in front of it and giving this statement. Now, of course, she also said that she wants the survivors to have their moment and that's great, but why don't you start by having your husband host the survivors at the White House? You know, something that he's avoided for all these months, calling it a hoax, calling it a Democrat trap, the whole thing. Meanwhile, these survivors have been ignored and been left behind once again. And not only that, but they've been attacked by Donald Trump's pundits. So if Trump and Melania really cared, first of all, they tell them to stop. The second of all, they'd invite them to the White House for a talk. None of that's occurred. So in this episode, we're going to talk a little bit more about Melania Trump and the statement that she gave at the White House yesterday. And to do that, why don't we start with the statement that Melania Trump gave. Good afternoon. The lies linking me with the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today. The individuals lying about me are, are devoid of ethical standards, humility and respect. I do not object to their ignorance, but rather I reject their mean spirited attempts to defame my reputation. I have never been friends with Epstein. Donald and I were invited to the same parties as Epstein from time to time, since overlapping in social circles is common in New York City and Palm Beach. To be clear, I have never had a relationship with Epstein or, or his accomplice, Maxwell. My email reply to Maxwell cannot be categorized as anything more than casual correspondence. My polite reply to her email doesn't amount to anything more than a trivial note. I am not Epstein's victim. Epstein did not introduce me to Donald Trump. I met my husband by chance at a New York city party in 1998. This initial encounter with my husband is documented in detail in my book Melania. The first time I crossed paths with Epstein was in the year 2000 at an event Donald and I attended together. At the time, I had never met Epstein and had no knowledge of his criminal undertakings. Numerous fake images and statements about Epstein and me have been circulating on social media for years now. Be cautious about what you believe. These images and stories were are completely false. I am not a witness or a name witness in connection with any of Epstein's crimes. My name has never appeared in court documents, depositions, victim statements, or FBI interviews surrounding the Epstein matter. I have never had any knowledge of Epstein's abuse of his victims. I was never involved in any capacity. I was not a participant, was never on Epstein's plane and never visited his private island. I have never been legally accused or convicted of a crime in connection with Epstein's sex trafficking, abuse of minors or other repulsive behavior. The false mirrors about me from the mean spirited and politically motivated individuals and entities looking to cause damage to my good name to gain financially and climb politically must stop. My attorneys and I have fought these unfounded and baseless lies with success and will continue to maintain my sound reputation without hesitation. To date, several individuals and companies have been legally obligated to publicly apologize and retract their lies about me, such as the Deadly Beast, James Carville and Harper Collins uk. Now is the time for Congress to act. Epstein was not alone. Several prominent male executives resigned from from their powerful positions after this matter became widely politicized. Of course, this doesn't amount to guilt, but we still must work openly and transparently to uncover the truth. I call on Congress to provide the women who have been victimized by Epstein with a public hearing specifically centered around the survivors. Give these victims their opportunity to testify under oath in front of Congress with the power of sworn testimony. Each and every woman should have her day to tell her story in public if she wishes, and then her testimony should be permanently entered into the Congressional record. Then and only then will we have the truth. All right, so that's the statement that Melania gave yesterday from the White House. Now let's check out the email in question. Dear G. How are you? Nice story about J. Sounds like Jeffrey Epstein in New York Magazine. You look great on the picture. I know that you're very busy flying all over the world. How was Palm Beach? I can't wait to go down. Give me a call when you get back in New York. Have a great time. Love, Melania. Then the response from Ghislaine. Sweet pea, thanks for your message. Actually, plans changed again and I am now on my way back to New York. I leave again on Friday. So I still do not think I have time to see you, sadly. I will try and call you though. Keep. Well, does that sound like somebody that doesn't know somebody else? Or does that sound like two people that are close, two people that are friendly, two people that know each other? And honestly, I'm blown away that she would even give this statement. Todd Blanch just got done telling us that there was nothing left to see here, that everything was over and done with. Donald Trump has told us the same thing. And then Melania Trump gets up here with this crazy ass statement like the whole world's focused on something else, right? With Iran, they're getting everything they want. And then all of a sudden Melania throws a live grenade into the situation. What the hell is going on here and what motivated it? Is there something on the way that's going to be that damaging? I mean, what else could it be? Or is she gone rogue and she's trying to screw over her husband? I mean, there's a lot to unpack here and I don't think the full story has been told yet. And I don't think we know what's really motivating this kind of statement by Melania Trump. And if I was a betting man, which I am, I would bet that there is a story that's being cooked up by some journalist right now or some researcher that's going to be damaging to Trump and Melania. I mean, if not, why drag this right back into the spotlight? And it just doesn't make sense from a strategic point of view. And when you have people over at Fox perplexed about your behavior, you know, things are about to get wild. So today we have an article from Fox News and the headline, why Melania Trump is denying alleged smears related to Jeffrey Epstein and wants victims to testify. This article was authored by Howard Kurtz. It was, and I don't say it lightly, a jaw dropping moment. I'm sitting here with the TV on and all of a sudden there's a live shot of Melania Trump reading a speech at the White House. Yeah, pretty much my reaction, too. I was already gone from the studio by that point. And when I got home and I saw the speech. I was just blown away by it because I didn't understand what was going on. Like, why would you do that? What would prompt such a speech? And just out of the blue, after Donald Trump has just told us to move on again and again and again, his own wife gets up there in the White House and starts talking about Epstein. Like, what kind of crazy ass messaging are we getting from the people in charge? And it just shows you how crazy this story is. And it's so radioactive that they can't even keep their narrative straight. A speech about Jeffrey Epstein, a speech about how she's being smeared in connection with the late pedophile. Like, nobody's even talking about Melania Trump right now. I think I have a pretty good feel for what the conversation is surrounding Epstein, and it hasn't been about Melania Trump. Not recently. Now, people have said that Epstein introduced Melania Trump to Donald Trump, and that's been one of the narratives, but it hasn't been headline stealing. In fact, nobody's really even talking about Epstein anymore due to the war in Iran. So they got exactly what they wanted. And then Melania Trump decides she's going to throw a grenade in the room and absolutely decimate the narrative that the White House and the DOJ has been so carefully creating for us. Something big is coming. That's my prediction. And, you know, I don't make very many of those. None of the journalists knew what to say. The first lady talking about Epstein. Reporters were told that she'd be making remarks, but not the subject matter, only that it would be newsy. Oh, it was newsy all right. It most certainly was. And now you have all the bloodhounds out sniffing around, wondering what's going on. And again, another self inflicted wound by the Trump administration. If it's such a hoax, why is the first lady giving a gigantic statement from the White House? Does that sound like a hoax to you? I know if something was a hoax and I was the President and my wife got on TV and started running yap about it, I'd probably be pretty pissed off. So what the hell's going on here? I never had a relationship with Epstein or his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. My email reply to Maxwell cannot be categorized as anything more than a casual correspondence. My polite reply to her email doesn't amount to anything more than a travel note. I'm not an Epstein victim. Epstein did not introduce me to Donald Trump. I met my husband by chance at a New York city party in 1998. The first lady said in her speech, there was pain in her voice. The three minute speech, read in her accented English, was not easy for her. When the Epstein files were released, there was correspondence between Maxwell, who called her Sweet Pea, and Melania signed her as love. Hardly a big deal. Say what now? Hardly a big deal. Someone calling you Sweet Pea and then you saying love to them. Closing the email tells us that you guys are a lot closer than you're letting on. So again, it's about the lies and how many people have been screwed when it comes to a cover up. When it comes to the lies, that's how people go to prison. I didn't know that there were any rumors about Melania Trump and Epstein. It seemed clear that the first lady was trying to get out ahead of something. But what this had the feeling of the tip of an iceberg. I agree 1,000%. I think something's on the way. I don't know what it's going to be. I don't know if it's going to have merit, but I think something damaging is coming. You don't give a statement like that unless there's something on the way. Especially because it runs counter to the narrative that the White House itself and the DOJ has been pitching. And that seems like a cover up in itself. I mean, is Melania Trump outing the Trump administration for their cover up here? Is that what she's doing? And if she's not, she's certainly giving that perception. They first crossed paths in 2000. I had never met Epstein. I had no knowledge of his criminal undertakings. Numerous fake images and statements about Epstein and me have been circulating on social media for years now. Be cautious about what you believe. These images and stories are completely false. Are they though? Are they really? We know that there's that lawsuit going on with Michael Wolf, and Michael Wolf is looking to depose Melania and Trump. Is it going to get to that point? Who knows? But Melania Trump and Donald Trump have been pretty sue happy when it comes to this topic. And I'm wondering if that's going to come back and bite them because it's one thing to file a lawsuit, it's a whole ass other thing to go through with discovery. Epstein pleaded guilty to sexual abuse in 2008 and served an absurdly light sentence of 13 months in Florida. And Donald Trump knew of his relationship with underage girls, having called Palm beach authorities about it back in 2006. Nobody knew though, right, Trump? I had no idea what. What Epstein was no clue. Meanwhile, that phone call in 2006. It's just Trump trying to get ahead of it. Why can't we be honest about what's going on? Trump's not some Serpico of Mar? A Lago wasn't working behind the scenes to take down Jeffrey Epstein. In fact, he was enjoying his company, his largess. I mean, remember Jeffrey Epstein, He's a great guy and he likes girls even younger than me. Bunch of degenerate sick bastards. Still, Melania said, I have never had any knowledge of Epstein's abuse of his victims. I was never involved in any capacity. Who said you were? Is there a story coming that says Melania was a recruiter or taking part? Because that'll be a bombshell. I haven't seen that. I'd love to see the information if that's what's coming out. But it has to be something damaging as right, because without it being something that's pretty big and something that's going to cause a gigantic bombshell to go off, I have a hard time believing that Melania Trump is going to bring this topic back to the forefront. When I tell you people were moving on, people were moving on. The war had the desired effect. Now the die hards like you, you were sticking around and morons like me. Well, I'm not going anywhere. I already told you that. I've burnt the ships on the shore. There's no going back for me. And while I appreciate all the newfound support for the issue, even if that wasn't the case, I'd still be here ringing the bell, just like I have been for seven years. But in my opinion, the whole entire point of what's going on in Iran was to get the attention off of what's going on with Epstein and maybe I'll do another episode about that. But now that we have, what, 40 days or so to reflect on what's going on in Iran, there's no objective, there was no off ramp. And this ceasefire seems to be ridiculous. What was accomplished besides killing the conversation surrounding Jeffrey Epstein? And then to have Melania Trump of all people drag it back into the forefront? Something's cooking. I have never been legally accused or convicted of a crime in connection with Epstein sex trafficking or abusive minors and other repulsive behavior. The false mirrors about me from mean spirited and politically motivated individuals and entities looking to cause damage to my good name to gain financially and climb politically must stop. She added that she and her lawyers have fought these unfounded and baseless lies with success. The New York Times reaction. It was not clear why she chose to speak out now or to what report she was referring. NBC's Garrett hack tweeted that the speech was breathing new life into the Epstein saga. Well, it did. I woke up to a ton of emails and people have questions and guess what? So do I. By the way, it was not a news conference, as the Washington Post and other outlets kept calling it. She took no questions. The first lady senior advisor, Mark Beckman, said in a statement noted by NBC that she's speaking out now because enough is enough and the lies must stop. Right in the middle of the ceasefire, right in the middle of this whole entire situation with Iran. Now she comes out and says this, why not previously? And then, of course, we have the Bondi situation. Bruin. And is this another distraction from that? I wish I didn't have to be so cynical, folks, but when you're dealing with the kind of shit we're dealing with here, unfortunately, you can't trust anybody. And that goes doubly for anybody that's involved with Jeffrey Epstein at all, including the Trumps. Needless to say, this catapults the story right back into the media narrative and at a time when it finally seemed to be fading as the country's attention is riveted on the Iran war and the shaky ceasefire. All by design. And to all of you who have not bought into the and have stayed steadfast with the story here, good job. You have not been fooled. You didn't fall for the psyop. You didn't look at the new shiny object. You've kept your eye on the ball because I'm telling you right now, nothing is going to change in this country unless we address this and we have to do it head on. And that means sometimes having uncomfortable conversations and understanding that people that you once trusted are not trustworthy. And I think a lot of people that are into politics are starting to understand that. And it's like cold water being thrown on your head, right? You wake up one day and you realize all those people you were supporting arguing about with your family members, you, you know, the whole thing. Well, they don't care about you. And not only do they not care about you, they despise you. Just look at the emails. Representative Robert Garcia, the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, said he agrees with the first lady and wants to schedule a public hearing immediately. The Republican chairman, James Comer, who recently subpoenaed Hillary Clinton to testify about Epstein, canceled the scheduled deposition with Pam Bondi after she was fired as Attorney General. Again, all by design. James Comer, he's in on it. And if we had a real special counsel, they'd uncover all of that. How many emails were sent back and forth between Comer and the White House when it comes to managing this story? When Bondi testified at a disastrous hearing, she spent her time attacking Democrats and refused to turn around and look at the victims seated behind her. Todd Blanche, her likely successor and now acting Attorney general, has said there is no need for the DOJ to do anything further on Epstein. So how does that jive with Melania's little speech here? Oh, that's right, it doesn't. Another narrative blown up when it comes to the DOJ and Jeffrey Epstein. And what's so crazy is that when one of these narratives gets blown up, they just move on to the next one and everybody just shakes their head and they're like, yeah, yeah, okay, cool. Is crazy to me. Why do people put so much stock in what people like Todd Blanche and the DOJ is telling us? What have they done to earn our trust? In my opinion, nothing. In fact, it's the opposite. Blanche, who interviewed Epstein's convicted enabler, Glenn Maxwell, who was then later transferred to a less restrictive prison, has also proclaimed his love for the president. But the last thing Donald Trump wants is a renewed media spotlight on Epstein survivors. So there is clearly some kind of distancing going on, and that's a big problem. The messaging here is fractured, and it's going to be an issue. I'm telling you right now, this is an issue. There's something cooking, and I wish I could tell you what it was, but something is on its way. What remains hazy is why Melania Trump decided to deliver this speech at the White House rather than even, say, putting out a statement. Is there an accusation, true or false, that she is trying to preempt? There is much that we still don't know. But like everyone else who is watching or has since seen the clips, I view it as a stunning moment in an administration that serves them up with amazing regularity. Folks, listen. Let's not pretend that what we just witnessed from Melania Trump is some off the cuff remark or a throwaway line meant to satisfy curiosity. It's not how the real world works, especially not at that level. Every word, every pause, every carefully measured sentence is weighed, rehearsed, and deployed with intent. And when someone like her steps into a conversation as radioactive as Epstein, it's not accidental. That speech didn't feel like closure. What it felt like was positioning, like someone bracing the public inch by inch for something they know can't be contained forever. Because here's the reality. You don't bring Epstein back into the spotlight unless you have to. Not now, not after the suppression, redaction, and carefully managed narratives. So when it happens, when someone with proximity to power reopens that door, it raises a much bigger question. Why now? And in my opinion, the answer isn't comforting. It suggests pressure behind the scenes. You. It suggests fractures in whatever wall has been holding this thing together. And maybe, just maybe, it signals that what's coming next isn't another round of surface level disclosure, but something deeper, something messier, something that doesn't just implicate individuals, but entire systems. So, no, I don't buy that this was just a moment. I think it was a warning shot. A subtle one, sure, but a warning nonetheless. The kind that tells you that the ground is shifting beneath the story we've all been fed. And if that's true, if this is really the beginning of a broader unraveling, then what we've seen so far, it's just the prologue. The real story, the damaging system shaking, reputationally catastrophic story might still be on its way. All the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.