
The UK’s Metropolitan Police Service (Met) is now “actively looking” into fresh allegations that Prince Andrew allegedly used a taxpayer-funded police bodyguard to obtain the U.S. Social Security number and date of birth of his accuser, Virginia...
Loading summary
A
You know what? It sucks to be bored. But when I get on my phone and play real casino games on spinquest.com, the time flies by. That two hour wait at the DMV seems like 10 minutes. Play your favorite slots, live blackjack, live craps with a live dealer. New players $30 coin packs are on sale for 10 bucks. Play spinquest.com and you'll never be bored again.
B
Spin Quest is a free to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
C
What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. In this episode we're going to pick up where we left off with the independent article authored by Amy Claire Martin. Met Police Looking into Allegations Over Bid to Smear Roberts the Met Police has confirmed it's actively looking into fresh allegations that Andrew tried to use his police bodyguard to smear his accuser. Leaked emails seen by the Mail on Sunday claim that Andrew handed over Robert's confidential Social Security number and date of birth to his taxpayer funded Met Police protection officer in 2011 in a bid to dig up dirt on her. How crazy is that? Like you're gonna use your taxpayer funded security team to try and dig up dirt on the girl you molested. Like what is wrong with you? And the crazy part is this fool really thinks that it's okay. Like he did nothing wrong. Everybody else is out to get him. He's the big victim and all of this is nothing more than a big old misunderstanding. That's how Prince Andrew still feels even after all this stuff has come out. Andrew reportedly wrote to Ed Perkins, Queen Elizabeth's deputy Press Secretary. It would also seem she has a criminal record in the United States. I have given her date of birth and Social Security number for investigation with xxx the on duty PPO Personal protection officer. So look, even if you don't believe that Prince Andrew was doing what Virginia said he was doing, how do you defend the fact that he was manipulating his office, his position, using taxpayer funded money to go after private citizens? That is completely unacceptable. And if he didn't know who Virginia was, he had no idea what she was up to. Why is he asking for people on his personal protection unit to look up information about her and try and find dirt about her? Sure. Seems to me that you're conducting oppo research and the only reason you do that is because you think that you're exposed. So that's why he was doing what he was doing. That's why he was trying to get information on Virginia so that he could point to her criminal record if something came out and say, look, she's not credible. She's just another crazy person trying to take down the crown. And that's why Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn Maxwell chose the girls that they did, because they knew they'd have a credibility problem if it ever came to it. Look, we can say what we want about Epstein, and there sure is a lot to say, but there's no doubt that him and Maxwell knew what they were doing with their operation. They had this thing locked in. They knew exactly which way to move, they knew what buttons to push, they knew what levers to pull, and they knew exactly who to draw in. And make no mistake, everything was done by design. Nothing they were doing was by mistake. Robert's family said she does not have a criminal record and is not clear if the bodyguard complied with the request. Even if she did have a criminal record, what does it matter? So if you have a criminal record, that means you can't be assaulted? That means I shouldn't listen to anything you say. Well, if that's the case, why are you guys bringing Ghislaine Maxwell in for a nice little chat? Oh, I get it. Ghislaine Maxwell is credible, but not Virginia, right? Bunch of clowns. The Met's former head of Royal Protection, Dae Davies, has urged the force to question the Royal under caution. If there is evidence that he abetted a police officer to. To commit a criminal offense of misconduct in public office. Well, yeah. Look, anyone who is in public office should be held to a higher account. You work for the rest of us. You're a representative of the people. And if you're out here stealing, you're out here cheating, you're out here molesting girls. That's a problem. And a world with some justice is a world where somebody like that is under investigation. But unfortunately, when you're a royal, the rules don't apply to you. It's time for Scotland Yard to launch a full criminal investigation into Prince Andrew. He told the Mail, asking a police officer to investigate an alleged victim is outside of their duties. Whether that is calling the FBI, your mates in the U. S, or searching out themselves to find out whether someone has a criminal offense. That is, in my view, a criminal offense itself. Yeah, I agree with that. You can't use your position to try and find information on regular people. I mean, that's just common knowledge. And we're not even talking about all the other bullshit this guy was up to. All the other money he was accepting, the other people he was around the other nonsense he was up to. According to legal experts, the allegations could also risk a criminal investigation in the us under the Theft and Assumption Deterrence act, individuals who knowingly use, transfer or possess another person's Social Security number with the intent to commit an illegal act can face a fine or a prison term in the most serious cases. Now, I doubt he's gonna get charged with that, but hey, look, you never know. I'd love it. Why not? If it's on the books, go for it. I mean, here in America, up until very recently, nobody had been charged with the Hatch act in a very long time, but here we are. So if it's a law that's on the books, it's a law that's on the books and hey, fair game. So if that's something to get Prince Andrew on, I'm all for it. Like I've told you before, I don't care what they get these people on, as long as they get them on something. And the example I always give is Al Capone. They couldn't get Capone for the murders, they couldn't get him for the Mafia type activity. They got his ass for the tax evasion, though. And I think the same will be true with all of these people that we talk about. You really think all these people are paying their fair share? You think they're ponying up every last dollar? They're declaring all of their valuables, all of their art, all of their real estate? Come on. So if you want to get to the bottom of it and you really want to get people like Prince Andrew over a barrel, that's how you do it. Spencer Cuvin, who represented nine Epstein victims, told the Telegraph, penalties for this crime are very severe and can be up to 15 years in prison. He called for the FBI also immediately to open an investigation into the use of Roberts Social Security number and request an interview with the Royal. Adding, both the US and British authorities should not protect this awful individual. The world should hold Andrew accountable and show everyone that justice matters. I think that would be great. Do I think it's going to occur? I don't, but it would be nice. However, the Met has not confirmed if it has launched an official investigation or what potential crime, if any, this could involve. A spokesperson added, we are aware of media reporting and are actively looking into the claims made. Family Court and women's rights barrister Dr. Charlotte Proudman said the bodyguard claims, if true, would represent a deeply troubling abuse of power. Well, yeah. Imagine being a prince and using this great power to try and find dirt on a 17 year old girl that you just had relations with. I mean folks, more than deeply troubling as far as I'm concerned. The idea that public resources could be used to discredit a victim of sexual exploitation reinforces why so many survivors feel unsafe coming forward. Show she told the Independent. This is not only about individual conduct, but about the wider failure of institutions, including the police, to confront misogyny and hold the powerful to account. Well, we can do without all the buzzwords, right? The fact is, the powerful are never held to account and it doesn't matter if they're a man or a woman. It doesn't matter. If you're rich and you got the right amount of dough, the right amount of friends, chances are you're going to beat one whatever charges are brought against you. Roberts, who took her own life in April this year, claims she was forced to sleep with Andrew three times, including once in London. The Prince has always denied the claims. Andrew is mentioned a total of 88 times in her 400 page diary style memoir, Nobody's Girl, published on Tuesday. In her book, Ms. Roberts alleged she was 17 and had been trafficked when she first slept with the royal while she was staying at Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell's house in London. We're still calling her his ex girlfriend. Come on, nobody believes that at this point, right? At least nobody listening to this podcast. I hope. She was his partner in crime, his confidant, his co conspirator, his girlfriend. Not in the traditional sense. Now maybe she gave him a little bit of booty every now and then or whatever, but besides that, you think he loved her? You think he cared about Ghislaine Maxwell's well being or her life or her dreams or what she wanted? Of course he didn't. And the same goes for Maxwell. It was a parasitical relationship, one that provided Epstein with more access and provided Maxwell with more money. She said that they had sex after a night in Tramp nightclub where she described Andrew, then 41, as a bumbling dancer. The next day Maxwell told her, you did well. The Prince had fun, Ms. Roberts wrote. Later Epstein gave her $15,000 for servicing the man the tabloids called Randy Andy. She said she claims that she was sent to a bedroom to have sex with Andrew again a month later when she was visiting Epstein's New York home. Ms. Roberts wrote that she does not know exactly when she had sex with Andrew for a third time, but said she had group sex with the royal and and eight other young girls on Epstein's Caribbean island of Little St. James, also referred to as Little St. Jeffs by the billionaire's friends. Anybody who refers to it as that should also be brought under oath. I think you know more than you're saying. Anybody who was on this dude's island with any regularity should be brought in. Now, I don't believe that just because you were on the island, you're guilty. Or if you are at Zorro, you're guilty. But I want to know what you know, and I want you to tell us under oath. And the reason I say that is you had all these years to come forward and be candid, but you haven't. So now it has to be forced. And once people have to start forcing you to talk about a situation that involves kids being hurt, we're gonna think you had something to do with it. Because most normal people would be trying to get out ahead of this, right? Well, look, I might have went to that island, but, you know, here's the receipts. I was there for a conference, or I was there for such and such an event, whatever it might be. But no, instead we just get silence and we get denials. In March of 2022, Andrew paid Ms. Roberts millions of dollars to settle a civil lawsuit in the US but he accepted no liability over the allegations of sexual assault. She brought the case under the New York Child Victims act because. Because it allowed her to raise allegations which would otherwise have passed the statute of limitations in US Law. Given one of the alleged assaults took place in London, the Met Police has faced pressure to investigate the royal. The fact that Ms. Roberts was 17 at the time is not in itself a crime because the legal age of consent in the UK is 16. However, if it could be proved that Ms. Roberts was a victim of sex trafficking or that Andrew had paid for the encounter, it's possible it could have criminal implications for the prince. Well, we know that it was paid for, but Andrew didn't pay for it. Jeffrey Epstein did. That was all part of the hustle, right? Part of Jeffrey Epstein's largesse, if you will. And it was also part of the COVID up to make sure that there's plausible deniability. Well, I have no idea. This was provided to me or whatever it might be. It and Prince Andrew's dumbass. I said from the very beginning, should have came out and said I was blackmailed. Jeffrey Epstein, you know, coerced me into all of this, and I had nothing to do with his. But he didn't even do that. He wouldn't even throw his buddy under the bus, Woody. So it makes me believe and leads me to believe that he's way more involved than we even know. Former Met Commissioner Crecida Dick claimed no one is above the law while she promised to review documents from the civil suit in 2021. But the force later confirmed they were taking no further action against the Prince. Well, that's because he is above the law. If it was anybody else, forget it. And I know I say this all the time, but you can't even make crazy posts on the Internet in England anymore. But if you're associated with Epstein and molesting little girls, I guess that's okay.
A
Forget whatever plans you have this weekend because you're staying at home and playing on Spin Quest. And there's never been a better time to sign up than right now. New users get $30 coin packs for just $10. All the table games you love with hundreds of slot games and real cash Prizes. That's at spinquest.com S P I N
B
Q U-E S-T.com Spin Quest is a free to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
C
It was the third time that the force had refused to launch an investigation. Issues police considered were whether there was evidence of a crime and whether the UK was the right jurisdiction for the case to be dealt with, Ms. Dick said. Dr. Proudman called for the Met to reopen their investigation, adding the force has an entrenched problem with misogyny in a pattern of minimizing violence against women and girls. In light of further evidence that has come to light in her book, it's difficult to understand why the Met have not reopened their investigation into Virginia Roberts original allegations against Andrew, she said. It's not just about one man or one case. It's about whether the police are prepared to confront their failures to protect women, especially when the accused is powerful. The investigation should be reopened so that the survivors can can have confidence that no one is above the law. Cabinet Minister Peter Kyle on Tuesday urged Andrew to cooperate with the U.S. authorities and give evidence about Epstein's crimes in 2020. Federal investigators accused Andrew of providing zero cooperation with the U.S. probe into Epstein and his conspirators, despite promising he was willing to help when he stood down from public duties in 2019. Oh well. What? He lied to us. Come on. Prince Andrew, the pillar of the earth type of guy. A man that would never lie to anybody, lie to us. I am blown away folks. Absolutely blown away, said nobody ever the guy's been lying about everything since the very beginning. And the fact that all these receipts are coming out now and sinking his ass is joyful to watch. This week, Business Secretary Mr. Kyle urged them to stick to his word, telling ITV's Good Morning Britain, I think anybody that has any information that could bring justice and information to victims of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes should be fully engaging with any of the authorities that are seeking to deliver that information and justice for the victims. He added, those victims must be first and they must be central to how we discuss and debate any of these issues relating to Jeffrey Epstein's saga, situation and crimes he committed. So, of course, anybody anywhere that has information that can deliver that justice should be sharing it openly. I believe that Andrew in the past has said that he would cooperate, and I urge him to stick by his word on that. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick agreed Andrew should give evidence to US Authorities about what he knew and what his involvement was in the scandal. So when it's all and done, here's the bottom line. Nobody's asking for a witch hunt. Nobody. Nobody's asking for revenge. What people want is the same thing they'd expect if they were in the hot seat. Accountability. The truth. A straight answer without the crown, the courtiers, or the carefully worded regret. Because justice doesn't care if you were born in a palace or a prison. It should only care what you did and who you heard. And that's the part that's really got a sting for Andrew. The realization that no matter how many press statements he hides behind, the world's already made up its mind. Silence speaks louder than any denial, and his silence is deafening. He's not just running from investigators. He's trying to run from history. And unfortunately for him, history doesn't forget. The Epstein story isn't going away. The victims aren't backing down. And every time Andrew tries to step back into public life, the shadow is going to be right there, waiting to remind him of what he refused to face. He can keep pretending, keep hiding, keep clinging to titles, but the truth doesn't need his permission to catch up. So, yeah, maybe he'll keep dodging investigators. But sooner or later, the royal armor cracks. The public's patience is gonna run out. And when that day comes, when the mask finally slips for good, he'll find out what real accountability looks like. Not the kind written by lawyers, but the kind written by time. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.
A
I'm here with Spinquest, where you can play and win from the comfort of your own home with hundreds of slot games and all of the table games you love with real cash prizes. Right now, thirty dollar coin packs are on sale for $10. For new users, it's all@spinquest.com. that's s P I N Q.
B
Spin Quest is a free to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
Episode: Will Prince Andrew Face Legal Consequences Amid The Epstein Fallout? (Part 2)
Host: Bobby Capucci
Date: May 16, 2026
This episode delves deeper into the mounting allegations against Prince Andrew and the questions surrounding his potential legal accountability in the broader fallout from Jeffrey Epstein's criminal network. Bobby Capucci analyzes the latest reporting—including an article by Amy Claire Martin—examining claims that Prince Andrew attempted to smear his accuser, Virginia Roberts (Giuffre), by abusing his royal privileges and taxpayer-funded protection. The episode addresses the failure of institutions to hold elites accountable, the level of public responsibility for law enforcement, and the ongoing impact of survivor testimony.
Overview of New Allegations:
The Met Police are investigating claims that Prince Andrew used his personal protection officer (PPO) to try to unearth damaging information about Virginia Roberts by sharing her Social Security number and date of birth (00:30).
The alleged conduct occurred in 2011, per leaked emails reviewed by the Mail on Sunday.
Bobby remarks on the unethical nature of using public resources for personal "oppo research":
"Like you’re gonna use your taxpayer-funded security team to try and dig up dirt on the girl you molested. Like, what is wrong with you?" — Bobby Capucci, (01:12)
Even if Roberts had a criminal record, Capucci questions the relevance:
"So if you have a criminal record, that means you can’t be assaulted? That means I shouldn’t listen to anything you say?" — Bobby Capucci (02:31)
Institutional Critique:
Misconduct in Public Office:
Ex-head of Royal Protection, Dae Davies, supports opening a criminal investigation:
"Anyone who is in public office should be held to a higher account... It’s time for Scotland Yard to launch a full criminal investigation into Prince Andrew." — Dae Davies (03:22)
Using a PPO for personal vendettas may itself be a criminal offense ("misconduct in public office").
Violation of U.S. Law:
Allegations could prompt a US criminal case under the Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act, which penalizes misuse of Social Security numbers.
Capucci sees legal opportunity:
"If it’s a law that’s on the books, it’s a law that’s on the books and hey, fair game... If that’s something to get Prince Andrew on, I’m all for it." — Bobby Capucci (05:08)
Spencer Cuvin, attorney for Epstein victims, says penalties "can be up to 15 years in prison" and calls for FBI and British authorities to hold Andrew accountable (05:51).
Barrister Dr. Charlotte Proudman:
"The idea that public resources could be used to discredit a victim of sexual exploitation reinforces why so many survivors feel unsafe coming forward." — Dr. Charlotte Proudman (08:13)
Bobby critiques institutional failures, not just individual conduct—"the powerful are never held to account... If you’re rich and you got the right amount of dough, the right amount of friends, chances are you’re going to beat whatever charges are brought against you." (08:49)
Despite "new evidence," the Met has refused to re-open the investigation against Andrew (14:08).
Dr. Proudman:
"The investigation should be reopened so that the survivors can have confidence that no one is above the law." (14:41)
Parliamentary figures including Cabinet Minister Peter Kyle and Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick have called on Andrew to "stick to his word" and fully cooperate with US authorities.
Bobby notes Andrew has failed to do so despite public promises:
"The guy’s been lying about everything since the very beginning. And the fact that all these receipts are coming out now and sinking his ass is joyful to watch." — Bobby Capucci (15:42)
Bobby emphasizes the demand is for accountability, not a witch hunt:
"What people want is the same thing they’d expect if they were in the hot seat. Accountability. The truth. A straight answer without the crown, the courtiers, or the carefully worded regret." (16:41)
Prince Andrew’s persistent silence and evasiveness contrasted with the enduring determination of survivors and public scrutiny.
On Andrew’s attempt to manipulate his office:
"He was manipulating his office, his position, using taxpayer-funded money to go after private citizens. That is completely unacceptable." — Bobby Capucci (01:51)
On law enforcement and accountability:
"Justice doesn't care if you were born in a palace or a prison. It should only care what you did and who you hurt. And that's the part that's really got a sting for Andrew." — Bobby Capucci (16:58)
On institutional inertia and survivor confidence:
"It’s not just about one man or one case. It’s about whether the police are prepared to confront their failures to protect women, especially when the accused is powerful." — Dr. Charlotte Proudman (14:24)
On the inescapability of truth:
"The truth doesn’t need his permission to catch up. So, yeah, maybe he’ll keep dodging investigators. But sooner or later, the royal armor cracks… Real accountability… Not the kind written by lawyers, but the kind written by time." — Bobby Capucci (17:24)
Bobby Capucci offers a scathing, unfiltered assessment of Prince Andrew’s actions, the lack of institutional accountability, and the persistent demand for justice by survivors and the broader public. While legal consequences for Andrew remain uncertain, the host contends that societal and historical judgment is already underway—and may ultimately prove more lasting than any courtroom verdict.
For further resources, episode notes, and links to referenced articles, see this episode’s description box.