BREAKING: Hyatt Executive Chairman Resigns Citing Epstein Ties

Summary

---

The Epstein Files

Episode Summary: BREAKING—Hyatt Executive Chairman Resigns Citing Epstein Ties

Release Date: February 21, 2026
Host: Island Investigation

---

Episode Overview

In this emergency episode, The Epstein Files investigates the sudden resignation of Tom Pritzker, Executive Chairman of Hyatt Hotels Corporation, due to recently publicized evidence tying him to Jeffrey Epstein. Using over three million pages of legal documents and DOJ data analyzed by the show’s AI pipeline, the episode builds a forensic timeline of Pritzker’s relationship with Epstein, demonstrating that the association was active, transactional, and extended well beyond Epstein's 2008 conviction.

---

Key Discussion Points

1. Background & Data Sources

• The AI-driven investigation draws from:
  • Sworn depositions (notably from the USVI v. JP Morgan Chase lawsuit, SDNY case 1.22-cv-10904-JSR)
  • DOJ’s Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA) data releases, specifically dataset 11
  • Internal scheduling and email communication logs
  • Forensic property records

2. The Core of the Pritzker-Epstein Relationship

• [02:04] The USVI v. JP Morgan Chase lawsuit revealed through deposition (Exhibit 46) that:
  • James “Jes” Staley (then JP Morgan Private Bank head) met Tom Pritzker via an introduction from Epstein.
  • Quote (Jes Staley, under oath): “He valued his network of contacts. Introducing me to Tom, vice versa, enhanced that network for him.” [04:05]
• Epstein leveraged introductions as "network enhancement" since he could no longer hold official board roles post-2008 conviction.
• Pritzker’s relationship with JP Morgan began directly from this Epstein introduction.

3. Evidence of Ongoing Contact (2017–2018)

• DOJ EFTA dataset provides Leslie Groff’s schedule logs:
  • [05:43] Cluster of entries for Tom Pritzker in late 2017–early 2018 (e.g., dinners and meetings in September, November, January).
    • E.g., “TDD Dinner w Tom Pritzker” for 19/20 September 2017 [05:59]
    • 5:00 PM confirmed meeting on November 7, 2017 [06:04]
    • Dinner at 5:30 PM on January 19, 2018 [06:14]
• Scheduling shows Pritzker meeting alongside others in Epstein's high-net-worth circle:
  • Leon Black (Apollo Global Management), Kathy Rimler (Goldman Sachs), Boris Nikolic (science advisor) [06:37]
• The pattern: Routine, bi-monthly meetings, overlapping with other major financial figures—contradicting the claim that the contact was rare or incidental.

4. Direct Correspondence: Emails & Power Dynamics

• [07:43] Direct emails remove administrative deniability:
  • September 2017: Pritzker emails Epstein about meeting scheduling and shares his international travel calendar [08:08]

    “He [Pritzker] mentions a Middle east trip. 10-24-28.”

• [09:00–09:38] Pritzker actively accommodates Epstein’s schedule, offering 7 AM slots:
  • Epstein's reply: “thurs better.” [09:30–09:34]
  • Commentary: “[It is] a complete inversion of the expected corporate power dynamic.” [10:06]
    (C, Analyst): “Yet the documentary evidence shows the billionaire corporate chairman offering highly accommodating time slots and the sex offender dictating the schedule with abrupt lowercase commands.” [09:38]

5. Corporate Name Leverage & Supply Chain

• [10:22–11:40]
  • April 2018 email: Epstein instructs an associate regarding SCDA Architects, specifically,

    "Tell him Tom Pritzker from Hyatt suggested him." [10:57]

• SCDA Architects worked on Epstein’s private Virgin Islands properties (central to his criminal enterprise).
• Epstein uses “Tom Pritzker from Hyatt” to secure architectural services, leveraging the Hyatt brand:
  • Quote: “He is leveraging a publicly traded hospitality brand to vet contractors for his private island.” (B) [11:40]
• Analysis: This creates direct reputational and legal risk for Hyatt, as Epstein essentially uses the corporate brand as operational cover.

6. Personal Logistics & Trip Facilitation

• [12:27–13:19]
  • April 2018: Pritzker volunteers to personally accompany “Karina” (identified in public reporting as Karina Shuliak, one of Epstein’s close associates) on international travel.

    Pritzker: “Yes, I can go with her. Happy to help.” [13:03]

  • The stated purpose: To help Karina “find a new girlfriend for Jeffrey” [13:19]
  • Analyst:

    “The executive chairman of a major hospitality brand is volunteering his personal time to accompany an associate of Jeffrey Epstein across Asia.” (C) [13:10]

  • Commentary on ethical boundaries:

    “Presented with the stated goal of finding a new girlfriend for a man with Epstein’s specific criminal history regarding minors, the response is not disengagement. The response is an offer to accompany her and facilitate the travel.” (C) [13:33]

7. The Resignation and Corporate Fallout

• [14:25–15:15]
  • February 16, 2026: Pritzker resigns, citing “regret,” “terrible judgment,” and “no excuse for failing to distance myself sooner.”
    • Quote (from Pritzker’s statement, read by host B):

      “There is no excuse for failing to distance myself sooner.” [14:46]
      (C): “Failing to distance myself sooner is the operative admission. The EFTA documents, the bi-monthly scheduling, the architectural referrals, the travel facilitation proved the exact opposite of distancing. They prove active integration.” [14:52]

  • Hyatt’s board executes a total separation; the CEO temporarily assumes chairman duties.

8. Broader Institutional Reckoning

• [15:45–16:18]
  • Multiple other resignations driven by the EFTA release:
    • Kathy Rimler (Goldman Sachs, general counsel), Brad Karp (Paul Weiss, law firm chairman), Sultan Bin Sulayem (DP World) [16:09]
  • Institutions now reject the “we just had dinner once” defense. The EFTA logs make the frequency and nature of contact auditable and irrefutable. [16:18]

9. Synthesis and Remaining Questions

• [16:36–18:24]
  • The timeline established is one of active integration:
    • Epstein is the nexus, introducing Pritzker for strategic "network enhancement" (deposition, emails, scheduling, supply chain, and personal facilitation).
    • Both Hyatt and Pritzker were used operationally in Epstein's network up to less than two years before Epstein’s final arrest.
  • Outstanding questions:
    • Are there further undisclosed introductions?
    • Was Pritzker's travel facilitation an isolated event?
    • How much of Epstein’s server and communication data remains unprocessed or unreleased to the public?

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “Network enhancement.”—Jes Staley, under oath, describing why Epstein introduced Pritzker to him (04:05)
• “Yet the documentary evidence shows the billionaire corporate chairman offering highly accommodating time slots and the sex offender dictating the schedule with abrupt lowercase commands.” (C, Analyst) [09:38]
• “He is leveraging a publicly traded hospitality brand to vet contractors for his private island.” (B, Host) [11:40]
• “The executive chairman of a major hospitality brand is volunteering his personal time to accompany an associate of Jeffrey Epstein across Asia.” (C, Analyst) [13:10]
• “Failing to distance myself sooner is the operative admission. ... They prove active integration.” (C, Analyst) [14:52]
• “Institutions are no longer accepting the ‘we just had dinner once’ defense. The Transparency act releases provide the raw metadata. Boards are auditing the server logs, seeing the frequency of the contact, seeing the transactional nature of the relationships and executing immediate separations to protect the corporate entity.” (C, Analyst) [16:18]
• “The forensic audit of these institutions is far from over.” (C, Analyst) [18:36]

---

Important Segments with Timestamps

| Time | Topic | |----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------| | 00:31–01:19 | Breaking news: Tom Pritzker resigns from Hyatt, cites Epstein ties | | 02:04–03:47 | Deposition of Jes Staley: Epstein introduces Pritzker to JP Morgan | | 05:22–06:25 | DOJ EFTA dataset: Pritzker’s bi-monthly meetings tracked in logs | | 07:43–09:38 | Direct emails reveal scheduling dynamic and power inversion | | 10:22–11:45 | Epstein uses Pritzker/Hyatt as leverage with international contractors | | 12:27–13:19 | Pritzker helps coordinate travel for Epstein associate | | 14:25–15:15 | Pritzker’s resignation statement, Hyatt board response | | 15:45–16:17 | Other high-profile resignations tied to EFTA document releases | | 16:36–18:24 | Synthesis, open questions, institutional reckoning |

---

Conclusion

The episode lays out a meticulously sourced forensic narrative: Tom Pritzker’s engagement with Epstein was far from historical; it was active, discreetly transactional, and deeply enmeshed with both his personal and professional resources up until the late 2010s. The unveiling of granular scheduling and communication data has not only upended Pritzker’s trajectory but is triggering widespread institutional repercussions across industries once insulated by plausible deniability. The AI-powered methodology of The Epstein Files demonstrates how publicly available documentary evidence is now shifting the balance of accountability in real time.

---

Transcript

[A]

3 million pages of evidence. Thousands of unsealed flight logs. Millions of data points, names, themes and timelines connected. You are listening to the Epstein Files, the world's first AI native investigation into the case that traditional journalism simply could not handle.

[B]

Welcome back to the Epstein Files. We're interrupting our regular schedule because as of February 16, 2026, Tom Pritzker, executive chairman of Hyatt Hotels Corporation, heir to one of the largest hotel dynasties in the world, has announced his retirement from Hyatt's board, citing in his own words, his association with the late Jeffrey Epstein. Today we're connecting this resignation to what the documents already show about Pritzker's relationship with Epstein. As always, every document and reference is available at epstein files.fm the most significant evidence comes from two first, under oath, court testimony from the USVI v. JP Morgan case. And second, nine emails from the DOJ's own Epstein files Transparency act release showing direct, ongoing correspondence between Tom Prisker and Jeffrey Epstein from 2017 through 2018.

[C]

The documentation we have access to now provides a very rigid framework. We are evaluating institutional decisions and corporate governance reactions in real time. When you analyze a resignation of this magnitude, the PR statements usually rely on abstract language. They talk about regret or bad judgment. But the documents give you the actual mechanics of that judgment. We are looking at specific server logs, sworn depositions and direct correspondence from the post conviction era of Epstein's life.

[B]

We should start by establishing the foundational architecture of this relationship before we get to the direct 2017 and 2018 emails. There is a structural link documented in the USVI v. JPMorgan Chase lawsuit that is case 1.22 CV10904JSR in the Southern District of New York.

[C]

That litigation is critical for understanding the banking mechanisms at play. The US Virgin Islands government initiated a $75 million lawsuit against JP Morgan alleging the institution enabled trafficking operations by maintaining Epstein as a client. During the discovery phase of that suit, former executives were deposed under oath.

[B]

Which brings us directly to Exhibit 46. This is the deposition of James Jess Staley dated June 10, 2023. We need to define who Staley was within this ecosystem. He was the head of the private bank at JP Morgan before eventually becoming the CEO of Barclays.

[C]

Private banking at that tier operates on a completely different paradigm than retail or even standard commercial banking. It is exclusively for ultra high net worth individuals. The currency in that division is discretion and access. Staley was the primary gatekeeper for that specific division at JP Morgan during this deposition.

[B]

The questioning turned specifically to Tom Pritzker Staley testifies under oath that Jeffrey Epstein was the individual who introduced Tom Pritzker to him.

[C]

You have to look at the institutional hierarchy of that introduction. On one side, you have the executive chairman of a $13 billion hotel empire. On the other side, a top tier executive at one of the preeminent global banks. Normally, these introductions happen through corporate channels, board overlaps, or elite economic forums.

[B]

They happen organically within that stratum.

[C]

Exactly. But Staley's testimony places Epstein as the necessary conduit between a billionaire hospitality executive and the head of J.P. morgan's private bank.

[B]

And the immediate result of that introduction is documented. Tom Pritzker subsequently became a client of J.P. morgan's private bank. The relationship was converted into a formal financial arrangement with the institution.

[C]

When the attorneys asked Staley to explain the rationale why Epstein would facilitate this introduction, Staley provided a very specific justification. I have the exact quote from the transcript here, Staley answered. He valued his network of contacts. Introducing me to Tom, vice versa, enhanced that network for him.

[B]

Network enhancement.

[C]

Network enhancement. In forensic auditing, we always look for the underlying utility of a relationship. After Epstein's 2008 conviction, he could no longer sit on public corporate boards or hold traditional fiduciary roles. His operational currency became his network. By delivering a client of Pritzker's caliber to JP Morgan, Epstein was demonstrating his ongoing value to the bank's leadership.

[B]

He was proving he still had access to the apex of the corporate world.

[C]

Correct. It validates his status. If the chairman of Hyatt relies on Epstein for banking introductions, it signals to other institutional players that Epstein remains a viable connected entity despite his status as a registered sex offender.

[B]

We need to note the timeline on this deposition. It was filed on July 25, 2023. This testimony regarding Pritzker's banking introduction sat in the public legal record for over two and a half years before the February 2026 resignation.

[C]

Corporate boards often tolerate dormant legal exposure if it doesn't cross into the mainstream news cycle. The deposition established how the relationship was utilized for business. But it was the release of the Epstein files, Transparency act datasets, that forced the issue. Because those documents establish the frequency and the operational proximity in the years immediately preceding Epstein's death.

[B]

We will examine those specific releases. Now. We're pulling from data set 11 of the DOJ's E. FTA release. These files contain the schedule logs maintained by Leslie Groff. She was Epstein's executive assistant.

[C]

Intake logs are highly reliable forensic tools. They aren't drafted for public relations. They are internal administrative records designed to manage a physical space and a daily itinerary.

[B]

We see a distinct cluster of entries for Tom Pritzker spanning late 2017 and early 2018. Document EFTA 022-21397 is dated September 13, 2017. The entry reads TDD Dinner w Tom Pritzker for the dates of September 19th or 20th.

[C]

The scheduling reflects an active relationship. This is nearly a decade after the Florida conviction.

[B]

The Then we have document EFTs 02228419. This is for November 7, 2017. The log shows a confirmed entry 5.00 P Enter Apt WTom Pritzker.

[C]

A 5 o' clock appointment is a

[B]

standard business hour block following that document EFT02235907 January 19, 2018. The schedule lists 5.30pm Duner Real Tom Pritzker.

[C]

When you map those data points September, November, January, you are looking at a BI monthly cadence. This indicates routine contact, but the true forensic value of these logs is found in the overlap. You have to analyze who else was being scheduled during those exact same windows

[B]

during the week of that November 7th appointment. The Groff schedules show Epstein also holding meetings with Leon Black of Apollo Global Management and Kathy Rimler of Goldman Sachs.

[C]

And on the exact same day as the January 19, 2018 dinner with Pritzker. The schedule confirms a breakfast with Leon Black and an appointment with Boris Nikolic

[B]

Mikalik being the former science advisor, right?

[C]

When you synthesize these schedules, Britzker is not an isolated entry. He is being rotated through the exact same scheduling blocks as a very specific cohort of high net worth and institutional figures. Leon Black eventually stepped down from his role at Apollo following an independent review of his financial ties to Epstein. Kathy Rimler's departure from Goldman Sachs is part of this exact same February 2026 wave of resignations.

[B]

It places Pritzker squarely inside the operational inner circle.

[C]

During those years, the corporate defense is often that the contact was infrequent or incidental. The server logs entirely dismantle that defense. You do not accidentally end up in a bi monthly rotation alongside Apollo Global Management executives on the calendar of a convicted sex offender.

[B]

The GROF logs only show the assistant's administrative view. We also have the direct communication between the two men. Document EFT E00222 1325 from data set 11. This is dated September 1, 2017. Tom Pritzker emails Jeffrey Epstein directly.

[C]

Direct peer to peer correspondence removes the layer of administrative deniability.

[B]

The subject of the email is coordinating the meeting Dates we just saw in the GROF logs. Pritzker is discussing the September 19 dinner or a September 20 afternoon slot. But within this logistical email, Pritzker includes an additional detail. He mentions a Middle east trip. 10-24-28.

[C]

You share international travel grids with someone when you are coordinating ongoing initiatives or maintaining a highly familiar relationship. It indicates their communication extended beyond simply setting up a dinner in New York. Pritzker felt it was relevant to keep Epstein updated on his global movements two months in advance.

[B]

Epstein was actively managing this incoming data. Document EFTA 022-2292 now is an internal system alert dated September 18, 2017. The alert asks did we schedule Tom Pritzker for 19th dinner or 20th afternoon or dinner?

[C]

That is an active tracking mechanism. Epstein is prompting his own system to ensure Pritzker doesn't slip through the cracks. It proves the relationship was pursued and maintained by Epstein's side as a priority.

[B]

The power dynamic in this relationship becomes overtly clear when you look at the Exchange in document Efta 229045. This occurs between November 6th and November 9th, 2017. It is a direct two way email chain. Pritzker initiates by offering meeting times. He writes 5pm on Thursday or 7am on Friday.

[C]

Offering a 7am slot on a Friday is an aggressive accommodation. You offer that kind of scheduling extreme when you are deferring to the other party's availability.

[B]

Epstein's reply to that offer consists of

[C]

two thirs, better lowercase, no salutation, thurs better.

[B]

And the appointment was confirmed for Thursday. Based on that two word reply, we

[C]

have to evaluate the institutional weight of the individuals involved in that exchange. Tom Pritzker is the executive chairman of a global corporation managing thousands of employees and billions in assets. Jeffrey Epstein is operating out of a private residence carrying the permanent status of a registered sex offender. Yet the documentary evidence shows the billionaire corporate chairman offering highly accommodating time slots and the sex offender dictating the schedule with abrupt lowercase commands.

[B]

It is a complete inversion of the expected corporate power dynamic.

[C]

It is and it directly addresses the terrible judgment cited in Pritzker's resignation. That email is the documentary evidence of that judgment. He was willing to bend his professional schedule to maintain access to that specific network.

[B]

We should advance the timeline to April 2018. This is where the documentation shifts from scheduling into brand leverage. Document EFTA 02241335 is dated April 17, 2018.

[C]

This is where the LIA crosses over from the individual to the corporation.

[B]

In this email, Epstein is writing to an associate regarding SCDA Architects. They are an architectural firm based in Singapore. Epstein is giving his associate instructions on how to approach the firm. The exact instruction reads, tell him Tom Prisker from Hyatt suggested him.

[C]

To understand the gravity of that instruction, you have to look at the architectural firm involved. Forensic property records show SCDA Architects was involved in the design and construction work for Epstein's private islands, Little James and Great St. James in the U.S. virgin Islands. Those properties were the central hubs of his trafficking network. In 2018, he was engaged in further construction on those islands.

[B]

Epstein is explicitly deploying Pritzker's name to facilitate that construction.

[C]

He is not just using Pritzker's personal name. He explicitly tags the corporate affiliation Tom Pritzker from Hyatt. Epstein is using the prestige and the implied financial stability of the Hyatt brand as a professional reference to the secure International Architectural services.

[B]

He is leveraging a publicly traded hospitality brand to vet contractors for his private island.

[C]

Exactly. The forensic question boards ask in these situations is about authorization. Did Epstein have standing permission to use Pritzker's name as a reference in the architectural space? The casual, direct nature of the instructions suggests Epstein was highly confident that if SCDA Architects reached out to verify the reference, Pritzker would confirm it.

[B]

It creates a documented link between the Hyatt brand and the supply chain for Epstein's island properties.

[C]

That is an unmanageable liability for a hospitality board. If your executive chairman is being used as a corporate credential by a convicted sex offender to build out an island compound, the institutional risk is severe. The EVFDA release made that internal communication public.

[B]

The documentation goes even further into personal facilitation that same month. Still, in April 2018, we have document EFTIC 02241670.

[C]

This exchange moves away from corporate referrals and directly into logistical support for Epstein's immediate circle.

[B]

The email chain concerns travel arrangements for an Epstein associate identified as Karina. Based on external reporting from Bloomberg and the Independent, this matches the profile of Karina Schuliak. The itinerary being discussed involves travel through Malaysia and Tokyo.

[C]

Epstein is coordinating international movement for this associate.

[B]

Pritzker responds directly to Epstein regarding this itinerary. He writes, yes, I can go with her. Happy to help.

[C]

I can go with her. The executive chairman of a major hospitality brand is volunteering his personal time to accompany an associate of Jeffrey Epstein across Asia.

[B]

We have to include the context of that specific trip provided by external reporting. According to the reporting on this exchange. When Pisker inquired about the purpose of Karina's trip, the response he received was that she was going to try to find a new girlfriend for Jeffrey.

[C]

You have to audit the reaction to that information. When presented with the stated goal of finding a new girlfriend for a man with Epstein's specific criminal history regarding minors, the documented response is not disengagement. The response is an offer to accompany her and facilitate the travel.

[B]

Happy to help.

[C]

It demonstrates a profound blurring of boundaries. Pritzker was offering logistical support, essentially acting as a high level chaperone for Epstein's operational network. This is not a passive banking relationship. This is active boots on the ground facilitation in foreign jurisdictions.

[B]

And again, the timestamp is critical. This is April 2018, barely over a

[C]

year before Epstein's final arrest. This dismantles any narrative that the association was a relic of the early 2000s. Pritzker was actively volunteering for travel logistics at the very end of Epstein's timeline.

[B]

Which brings our timeline to the current corporate fallout. February 16, 2026 the resignation of Tom Pritzker.

[C]

The documents force the corporate governance mechanisms to activate.

[B]

Pritzker's official statement includes three specific sentences we need to evaluate against the evidence. He states, I deeply regret my prior association with Jeffrey Epstein. He follows with I exercise terrible judgment in maintaining contact with them and concludes with There is no excuse for failing to distance myself sooner.

[C]

Failing to distance myself sooner is the operative admission. The EFTA documents, the BI monthly scheduling, the architectural referrals, the travel facilitation proved the exact opposite of distancing. They prove active integration. When those dataset releases became public, the contradiction between the PR narrative of a distant past relationship and the reality of the 2018 emails became unsustainable.

[B]

The board's action is decisive. He is retiring as Executive Chairman. He is not standing for re election to the Hyatt board. Mark Hoplamazian, the current CEO, is absorbing the chairman responsibilities.

[C]

It is a total separation. Hyde's board conducted a risk assessment. When you review these specific documents, you are looking at a Chairman whose name is embedded in the operational logistics of Epstein's network. The board recognized that the ongoing association with these newly public EFEA logs was an existential threat to the brand's reputation.

[B]

This resignation is part of a much broader institutional reckoning happening right now in February 2026.

[C]

The EFT data sets are functioning as a catalyst. We are seeing parallel departures across multiple sectors based on these exact same files.

[B]

We mentioned Kathy Rimler earlier. She Stepped down from her role as general counsel at Goldman Sachs. Her name was right there in the November 2017 gross schedule. Alongside Pritzker.

[C]

Brad Karp, the chairman of the law firm Paul Weiss, has also departed. Sultan Ahmed Bin Suleim of DP World is another high profile exit.

[B]

The pattern is undeniable.

[C]

Institutions are no longer accepting the we just had dinner once defense. The Transparency act releases provide the raw metadata. Boards are auditing the server logs, seeing the frequency of the contact, seeing the transactional nature of the relationships and executing immediate separations to protect the corporate entity.

[B]

To synthesize the evidence we have reviewed today, the documents provide a clear forensic timeline of integration. The USVIV JP Morgan deposition of Jess Staley established that Epstein facilitated Pritzker's entry into the private bank. And Epstein classified this as network enhancement.

[C]

The relationship was fundamentally transactional from the bank's perspective.

[B]

Then the EFTA dataset 11 releases confirmed the operational cadence. The GROF schedule showed Pritzker taking meetings and dinners in September, November and January of 2017 and 2018, overlapping with figures like Leon Black.

[C]

He was part of the managed cohort.

[B]

The direct email showed Pritzker sharing international travel dates and actively accommodating Epstein's schedule.

[C]

The inversion of standard corporate power dynamics.

[B]

The SCDA architect's email showed Epstein using the Hyatt brand to secure resources for his island properties. And the Karina email showed Pritzker volunteering to facilitate international travel for Epstein's associates.

[C]

The documentation completely refutes the concept of a dormant or historical relationship. The contact was active, it was frequent and involved multiple dimensions of Pritzke's professional and personal resources. Less than two years before the network was finally shut down, there are still

[B]

gaps in the public record. What remains unknown is the full scope of the network enhancement Staley identified. The documents show Epstein introducing Pritzker to JP Morgan. We do not have the document showing who Pritzker may have introduced Epstein to in return.

[C]

We also lack the full context of the logistical support. The April 2018 travel offer is a single documented data point. We do not know if Britzker accompanied other associates on other trips or if that was an isolated offer. The IFETIER releases provide a window into the operation, but they do not represent the entirety of Epstein's server data.

[B]

Tom Pritzker is officially out at Hyatt Hotels Corporation. The documents driving that departure remain in the public trust. We'll be watching this closely. If more documents surface or charges are filed, we'll be back with an update.

[C]

The forensic audit of these institutions is far from over.

[B]

Thanks for joining us on the Epstein Files.

[A]

You have just heard an analysis of the official record. Every claim, name and date mentioned in this episode is backed by primary source documents. You can view the original files for [e-mail] fm if you value this data first approach to journalism. Please leave a five star review wherever you're listening right now. It helps keep this investigation visible. We'll see you in the next file.