← The Epstein Files
The Epstein Files
File 103 - Thorbjørn Jagland Set Up a Putin Meeting for Epstein. Norway Just Charged Him.
00:19:52
Loading summary
Transcript112 lines
- [00:00]
A
Hey, it's the creator of the Epstein Files. Before we get into today's episode, I need to tell you about my brand new podcast, Wardesk. If you value how we fact check the narrative and follow the raw data on this show, Wardesk is built for you. It's a massive ongoing investigation into the rapidly escalating developments happening in the Middle east right now. It is completely post partisan and follows the facts. Instead of cable news talking points, we go straight to the source to explain the reality of global conflict. Search for Wardesk on Apple Podcasts or Spotify right now. Or check this episode's description for the links and hit follow. Alright, let's get into the episode. 3 million pages of evidence. Thousands of unsealed flight logs. Millions of data points, names, themes and timelines connected. You are listening to the Epstein Files, the world's first AI native investigation into the case that traditional journalism simply could not handle.
- [01:13]
B
Welcome to the Epstein Files. Last time we examined Casey Wasserman, the man running the 2028 Olympics, and the emails he sent to Ghislaine Maxwell that are now in the release files. Today we are looking at Thorbjorn Jagland, former Prime Minister of Norway and Chair of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, who the files show attempted to arrange a private meeting between Jeffrey Epstein and Vladimir Putin. Norway has now charged him as part of our ongoing investigation.
- [01:37]
C
As always, every document and source we reference is available at epsteinfiles fm.
- [01:42]
B
So let us start with the emails. The documents showing Jagland acting as intermediary between a convicted sex offender and and the Russian president.
- [01:50]
C
You know, to really grasp the severity of this backchannel, you have to understand the sheer global weight of the man operating it. Right, Thor? Bjorn Jaglan is not some mid level bureaucrat. He is a geopolitical titan. We are talking about a former Prime Minister of Norway. He served as the Secretary General of the Council of Europe. That is an organization representing 46 member states. It acts as the entire continent's leading human rights watchdog.
- [02:17]
B
And during the exact window of time we are investigating, in these documents, he was the chair of the Nobel Peace Tribes Committee.
- [02:23]
C
Exactly. His public identity was the ultimate global moral authority. You do not get more prestigious than that.
- [02:30]
B
Which makes the paper trail we pulled from the archives so jarring. We are working with internal communications and financial records released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. I am laying out the first batch of documents here from 2013.
- [02:43]
C
And the official narrative was always that Epstein was a total pariah after his 2008 conviction in Florida, Right?
- [02:49]
B
That was the claim. But the records from the Epstein files Transparency act showed the chair of the Nobel Committee actively cultivating a relationship with him.
- [02:57]
C
That contradicts the established timeline of Epstein's social isolation entirely.
- [03:02]
B
I am Looking at document EFTA year 1-898-547. The date is March 18, 2013. Look at the casual nature of this email. Epstein writes directly to Jagland. I am quoting here. Bill has given me two dates, the 25 and the 27th. I want to spend time with you and hear about your adventures. Is one day better than another just
- [03:22]
C
lowercase letters, poor punctuation?
- [03:24]
B
Minajiro Diplomatic protocol.
- [03:26]
C
Look at what they are leaving out of the official diplomatic calendar. They are actively coordinating in private the bill they are casually referencing. There is Bill Clinton.
- [03:35]
B
Yes. The surrounding emails in that chain mention Bill's assistant following up on an invitation.
- [03:42]
C
But notice Jaglin's response to Epstein. A former Prime Minister does not usually ignore that lack of protocol. Instead, he bends his own schedule. Jaglin writes back offering a lunch at 1:30pm and adds, Just tell me when you arrive and how many. I can get a car to pick you up.
- [03:58]
B
He offers to send a car.
- [04:00]
C
Why is the man who decides the Nobel Peace Prize acting as a private concierge for a registered sex offender?
- [04:06]
B
The power dynamic in that 2013 email is completely inverted. The head of European Human Rights is accommodating the demands of a disgraced financier.
- [04:15]
C
It does not read like a formal diplomatic exchange. It reads like an alliance.
- [04:19]
B
And that dynamic accelerates. We advance the timeline to 2018. The relationship transitions from these casual lunches in Strasbourg to overt high level diplomatic brokering. The emails reported by Fox News, which are now fully accessible on the archive, expose the true scope of the operation.
- [04:37]
C
Walk us through that 2018 exchange.
- [04:40]
B
Jaglin emailed Epstein to thank him for a lovely evening. In that same message, Jaglan explicitly outlines his upcoming schedule. He nodes he would be meeting with the assistant to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
- [04:53]
C
The official story doesn't match the data. The public was told Epstein was contained localized to his properties in New York and Florida. Yet here we have a document showing a former European head of state feeding him updates on meetings with the highest levels of the Russian government.
- [05:08]
B
And Epstein is not just a passive recipient of this intel. I am reading Epstein's exact response from the files. Epstein told Jaglin to tell Putin that Lavrov quote, can get insight on talking to me.
- [05:19]
C
He is instructing a Nobel chairman to pitch his value directly to the President of Russia.
- [05:23]
B
He then adds a boast to validate his credibility. Epstein writes, vitaly Churkin was great. He understood Trump after our conversations.
- [05:33]
C
That contradicts the evidence of Epstein being a mere financial fraudster or a domestic blackmailer. Vitaly Churkin was Russia's immensely powerful ambassador to the United Nations. He had died the year prior to this email.
- [05:45]
B
Right.
- [05:46]
C
Epstein is explicitly telling Jaglan that he sat down with Russia's top diplomat in New York and briefed him on how to manipulate or understand the American President. And now he is demanding Jaguand pass that message straight to Putin.
- [06:00]
B
We have to interrogate the motive here. What leverage or intelligence is Epstein seeking? By inserting himself into the Kremlin's orbit,
- [06:07]
C
he is marketing himself as the ultimate interpreter of American political power. But you have to ask the other side of the equation. We know what Epstein was extracting. Access to Putin and Lavrov. What was Jaglan receiving in return?
- [06:19]
B
The New York Times examined this, running an analysis titled the Mutually Beneficial Ties between Jeffrey Epstein and Mr. Human Rights. They correctly identified this was a transaction.
- [06:28]
C
A man with Jaglin's profile does not risk his legacy and his freedom to run errands for a predator without massive compensation.
- [06:35]
B
When you trace the capital flowing back to Jagland in the documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency act, the architecture of their arrangement becomes visible. I'm pulling the American Express Centurion Travel Service records from March and April 2014. These are document IDs, EFT year 021, level 189 and EFT year 00290123.
- [06:57]
C
The Centurion Card is the Black card. It is an ultra exclusive invite only financial instrument designed to facilitate limitless spending for the billionaire class.
- [07:06]
B
We are looking at internal booking records and invoices paid directly by Epstein's network. The passenger list is explicit. It is not just the former Prime Minister.
- [07:14]
C
Who else is honor?
- [07:15]
B
The passengers listed are Thor Bjorn Jaglund, his wife Han Grotjord and three additional family members, Anders, Henrik and Camilla Hayconson.
- [07:23]
C
Look at the sheer scale of the entitlement in those logs. This is not a subsidized flight for a human rights conference.
- [07:28]
B
The documents detail first class and business flights routed out of Frankfurt and Oslo. They fly into Atlanta, connect down to Miami and then move on to St Thomas in the Virgin Islands.
- [07:37]
C
And where did they stay?
- [07:39]
B
The itinerary includes extended stays at the 1 Hotel, South beach in Miami.
- [07:43]
C
That property is known for extreme secluded luxury. Jaglan is allowing A sex offender to bankroll a massive multi destination Caribbean vacation for his entire extended family.
- [07:55]
B
The internal coordination of that vacation reveals the mechanics of Epstein's office. I am looking at an email from Epstein's executive assistant Leslie Grof. The date is March 12, 2014.
- [08:05]
C
Read the exact phrasing.
- [08:07]
B
Grof writes to Epstein. Jaglan has approved the ticks. May I have your approval to purchase them? All we need to do today.
- [08:14]
C
The double exclamation points. The sheer urgency.
- [08:17]
B
She literally wrote the word today with two exclamation points. It shows that securing this travel for the Nobel chairman was treated as a high priority operational objective.
- [08:26]
C
The panic in her phrasing demonstrates that Epstein's staff understood the exact value of the asset they were acquiring. They were locking in a sitting European power broker.
- [08:36]
B
And you must cross examine the hypocrisy of the institutions that brought Jagland up. How does the Secretary General of the Council of Europe reconcile acting as a backchannel to an autocratic government in exchange for black card vacations?
- [08:50]
C
The Euromaidan press had warned for years that Jaglin functioned as a conduit for the Kremlin. These transparency files provide the verified financial and logistical proof that his influence was actively being purchased and deployed.
- [09:03]
B
The public release of these travelogs and emails forced the hand of European institutions they could no longer ignore. The paper trail facility detailed the procedural fallout. The Council of Europe was backed into a corner and ultimately had to strip Jagland of his diplomatic immunity.
- [09:19]
C
That is a monumental legal step. Diplomatic immunity is the ultimate shield for global power brokers. Lifting it was the absolute prerequisite for Norwegian prosecutors to even begin building a criminal case.
- [09:31]
B
But look at the timeline of that institutional response.
- [09:34]
C
It contradicts the narrative of a swift pursuit of justice. Why did the Council of Europe take years to lift his immunity after the first wave of these emails surfaced?
- [09:43]
B
The delay exposes a deep institutional reluctance.
- [09:46]
C
They did not want to confront the reality that their former leader, the man who shaped their human rights policies, was operating a shadow diplomacy ring funded by illicit money. They shielded him until the sheer volume of documentary evidence released under the Epstein Files Transparency act made it impossible to maintain the COVID up.
- [10:04]
B
Once that shield of immunity was removed, the Norwegian legal system moved with remarkable aggression. There was already a European precedent forming. The United Kingdom's handling of Prince Andrew paved the way. It signaled that royal titles and diplomatic untouchability were no longer absolute defenses against Epstein related evidence.
- [10:23]
C
When the full cache of files dropped, it triggered an absolute political storm in Norway that was extensively Documented by Al Jazeera and pbs.
- [10:31]
B
Norwegian prosecutors did not build their case on rumors. They built it on the exact American Express travel invoices and the Lesley Graff emails we just walked through.
- [10:40]
C
They traced the first class flights from Oslo to Miami. They audited the hotel bookings at the one Hotel, South Beach. They looked at the exchange of value vacations for diplomatic access. And they filed charges.
- [10:51]
B
As reported by the New York Times, National Today and the Nordic Page, the former Prime Minister of Norway was formally charged with gross corruption.
- [11:00]
C
Gross corruption in the Norwegian legal framework carries immense weight and the human toll
- [11:05]
B
of those charges being filed was catastrophic. First Post reported a severe development during the probe. Thor Bjorn Jagland attempted suicide.
- [11:13]
C
The exposure of his actions, the stripping of his prestige and the weight of the criminal charges resulted in a total personal collapse. He fell from the absolute pinnacle of global moral authority to facing the reality of prison in his home country.
- [11:27]
B
It is about institutional accountability causing real severe consequences.
- [11:31]
C
The official story is a tragedy of a fallen statesman. The but we have to focus on the institutional realities that drove him to that point. Norway prosecuted a former head of state because the documentary evidence demanded it. They looked at the paper trail of a corrupted relationship and applied the law.
- [11:47]
B
Which forces us to confront a glaring discrepancy in how this exact same network of evidence is being handled across the Atlantic.
- [11:55]
C
The transatlantic gap is undeniable. You have Norway prosecuting its former Prime Minister for accepting flights and brokering meetings based on the emails released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. You have the UK scripting a prince of his duties.
- [12:09]
B
But in the United States, the Justice Department has not prosecuted a single person from Epstein's network since his death. Not one.
- [12:17]
C
The official story doesn't match the data in the American archives. Norway looked at business class flights and a hotel stay in Miami and determined that was enough to meet the legal threshold for gross corruption.
- [12:28]
B
Meanwhile, the United States possesses files showing far more expensive multimillion dollar financial entanglements, real estate transfers and logistical support between Epstein and prominent American politicians, Wall street executives and academics.
- [12:44]
C
Yet the American legal system remains entirely silent. What does that gap reveal about the institutional will of our justice system? It suggests a deliberate systemic shielding of powerful figures within the US That European courts are no longer willing to uphold.
- [13:01]
B
We have to shift our investigation from what the documents explicitly to the massive blind spots that remain in the record.
- [13:07]
C
The unanswered questions.
- [13:08]
B
Exactly. We have the Leslie Grof emails, We have the American Express invoices. We know the flights were paid for and we know JAG Land actively agreed to act as the intermediary to the Russian government. But there is a missing piece.
- [13:21]
C
The documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency act do not definitively show if the private meeting between Jeffrey Epstein and Vladimir Putin was ever completed.
- [13:29]
B
Look at what they're leaving out. The official response from the Kremlin is absolute silence. Russia has never publicly commented on the Epstein Jaglan Putin pipeline.
- [13:39]
C
That silence is a tactical maneuver. They do not confirm, they do not deny. But as investigators, you can deduce Epstein's operational objectives by examining his other communications from that exact same window of time.
- [13:51]
B
We look back to the Fox News reporting on the House oversight emails in 2018. Around the same time Epstein was directing Jaglan to contact Lavrov's office, Epstein was actively boasting to other WARN leaders about his access to the Trump administration.
- [14:06]
C
I am looking at a documented Exchange. Following the 2018 summit in Helsinki.
- [14:10]
B
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers reached out to Epstein asking. I'm quoting the document, do the Russians have stuff on Trump today was appalling even by his standards.
- [14:20]
C
Look at Epstein's reply to that specific question. He dismisses the idea of Russian blackmail entirely. He calls the American president totally predictable. Epstein writes back, he has no idea of the symbolism. He has no idea of most things.
- [14:32]
B
That contradicts the prevailing media narrative of the time.
- [14:36]
C
It exposes the exact product Epstein was selling on the global intelligence market. He was cultivating parallel tracks.
- [14:43]
B
On one side, Epstein was deeply embedded in the American political orbit, assessing vulnerabilities, analyzing operational habits and gathering psychological profiles of the administration.
- [14:55]
C
And on the other side, he was utilizing JAG Land to open channels directly into the Russian offering to brief Lavrov and Putin with the insight he had gathered.
- [15:05]
B
Which brings us back to the missing link. We have the financial payment to the intermediary. We have the geopolitical pitch Epstein was making. We have the documented emails of Jaglan arranging the meetings.
- [15:16]
C
But we lack the final debrief or the flight log that confirms Epstein actually sat down in a room with the Russian president. That gap in the record requires us to apply intense investigative skepticism to the Norwegian prosecution itself.
- [15:29]
B
Are you suggesting the charges in Norway are incomplete?
- [15:32]
C
I am suggesting you look at the scope of the indictment. Norway is charging Jag Land with gross corruption specifically tied to the financial aspects. The Caribbean flights, the luxury hotels. It is a clean, localized paper trail.
- [15:47]
B
But you have to ask, are Norwegian prosecutors intentionally keeping the charges focused strictly on financial corruption to avoid confronting the geopolitical bombshell?
- [15:58]
C
Is charging a former prime minister with A financial crime. The safest way to bury an international espionage story. Because if Norway attempts to prove in open court that their former leader facilitated a shadow intelligence briefing between a convicted predator and the Kremlin, they drag their entire nation into an unprecedented global diplomatic crisis.
- [16:16]
B
That aligns with how these cases are historically managed. Proving an illicit vacation is a straightforward presentation of American Express receipts. The narrow scope of the corruption charges ensures Jaglan faces accountability for the financial crime, but it leaves the international access machine unexamined in the public record.
- [16:33]
C
We need to synthesize the evidence we have parsed from the archive. Thor. Bjorn Jaglan did not simply maintain a polite social acquaintance with Jeffrey Epstein.
- [16:41]
B
The internal communications prove he weaponized his position as the guardian of the Nobel Peace Tries.
- [16:48]
C
He used that untouchable prestige to broker access to the Russian president. For an American sex offender, that is not an accident of scheduling. That is a calculated, compensated transaction. Epstein identified the vulnerabilities in Jaglin's vanity and his finances, and he exploited them to build a bridge to Moscow.
- [17:07]
B
The ultimate conclusion of this file is that Epstein's operation extended far beyond domestic blackmail or running an illicit ring for wealthy financiers in New York and Palm Beach. The verified documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency act suggest Epstein was operating a sophisticated geopolitical access machine.
- [17:26]
C
Figures like Jagland, who sat at the intersection of Western human rights institutions and Eastern European power, were not just guests on an island. They were central nodes in that machine.
- [17:35]
B
We must anchor our findings strictly to what the verified documents prove. First, the files explicitly document Jaglan's active intermediary role, passing messages regarding Sergey Lavrov and Vladimir Putin.
- [17:49]
C
Second, the financial records prove Epstein subsidized Jaglan's extended family with luxury international travel.
- [17:55]
B
Third, the sheer weight of this evidence forced the Council of Europe to lift his diplomatic immunity.
- [18:01]
C
And fourth, the Norwegian government charged him with gross corruption. Those are the indisputable facts on the record.
- [18:08]
B
Yet massive questions remain unanswered. Did that final meeting with Putin occur in the shadows? What specific intelligence, what specific leverage did Epstein plan to trade with that access?
- [18:19]
C
And crucially, was any United States intelligence agency aware of the Epstein Jaglan Putin pipeline while it was being constructed? The total absence of American prosecutions suggests a deliberate choice to let these geopolitical entanglements remain buried in the archives.
- [18:34]
B
When you lay all these documents out on the table, you are forced to question the structural integrity of the global institutions. You are told to trust a single
- [18:42]
C
operative armed with stolen wealth and illicit leverage managed to compromise the head of the Nobel Peace Prize committee. He turned a global human rights leader into a pawn in a shadow game of international chess between Washington and Moscow. If a node that's central to our global architecture was compromised that easily, you have to ask how many others are hiding in the redactive files?
- [19:03]
B
Remember, this is an ongoing investigation and everything we cited is sourced at Epstein Files FM.
- [19:09]
C
Next time on the Epstein Files, file 104. The DOJ is withholding 50 pages of FBI interviews about Trump and Epstein.
- [19:21]
A
You have just heard an analysis of the official record. Every claim, name and date mentioned in this episode is backed by primary source documents. You can view the original files for yourself at epsteinfiles fm. If you value this data first approach to journalism, please leave a five star review wherever you're listening right now. It helps keep this investigation visible. We'll see you in the next file.