File 120 - Ehud Barak Visited Epstein's Mansion. Israel Won't Investigate.

Summary

The Epstein Files – Episode Summary
Podcast: The Epstein Files
Host: Island Investigation
Episode: File 120 – Ehud Barak Visited Epstein's Mansion. Israel Won't Investigate.
Date: March 14, 2026

---

Episode Overview

This episode investigates the relationship between former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Jeffrey Epstein, focusing on Barak’s documented visits to Epstein’s Manhattan mansion and private island, significant financial ties, and investments in Epstein-backed ventures. Despite substantial evidence, Israeli authorities have not opened any investigations or inquiries—a pointed contrast to international responses in parallel cases. The episode leverages AI-powered analysis of primary documents, mapping out the web of associations, tracing financial flows, and dissecting evolving public narratives around Barak's connection to Epstein.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Ehud Barak’s Documented Visits to Epstein Properties

• Barak was photographed entering Epstein's Manhattan mansion (9 East 71st Street) years after Epstein became a registered sex offender. The visit was notably secretive, with Barak disguising his identity:

  "You pull a camouflage neck gator high over the bridge of your nose, you pull a dark winter hat low over your brow, and you walk up to the most heavily scrutinized private doorway in Manhattan. I mean, why?"
  — Co-Investigator [01:36]

• Barak’s visits included not only the Manhattan residence—a highly visible, notorious address—but also Little St. James, Epstein’s private island, which is strongly linked to his trafficking operation:

  “Barak confirmed visiting Epstein's residences on multiple occasions, including the New York mansion and Epstein's private island.”
  — Lead Investigator [03:50]

2. Contrast Between Official Narratives and Evidence

• Barak’s representatives described these visits as "standard networking for a former head of state." However, the hosts highlight a “severe disparity” between this claim and Barak's visible efforts to conceal his identity and the secretive context of the visits.

  “A person attending a standard geopolitical strategy session does not dress like they are attempting to evade a perimeter patrol.”
  — Co-Investigator [03:34]

• Public acknowledgment of the visits only came after physical evidence surfaced, highlighting a pattern of “revision and minimization” in Barak’s and his representatives’ statements.

3. Financial Connections: Consulting Fees and Trust Structures

• Barak received approximately $2.3 million routed through the Wexner Foundation, an Epstein-linked philanthropic trust, masked as payment for consulting:

  “The stated purpose for this $2.3 million transfer was categorized broadly as consulting services and research...But in any standard corporate architecture, a multi million dollar consulting arrangement generates a massive undeniable paper trail...The paper trail regarding those deliverables is entirely non existent in the public record.”
  — Co-Investigator and Lead Investigator [06:07–06:51]

• The lack of published deliverables or supporting documents for such compensation is called out as highly suspicious:

  “Yet no research paper, no strategic advisory document, and no policy brief has ever been published to justify the expense. The only missing element is the actual work product.”
  — Co-Investigator [06:51]

• The process is described as a “financial invisibility cloak,” with charitable trust structures conferring legitimacy on suspect transactions:

  “If Epstein pays a politician directly from his personal bank account, regulatory alarms go off immediately. But if the money flows through a respected charity foundation…the capital appears completely clean.”
  — Co-Investigator [08:06]

4. Business Ties: The Case of Carbine 911

• Barak served as chairman of Carbine, a technology company, while it received a $1.5 million investment from “Southern Trust Co. Inc.”—an offshore Epstein entity:

  “A massive capital infusion of approximately $1.5 million was accepted into Carbine’s books. And that money originated directly from an Epstein connected funding source.”
  — Co-Investigator [10:13]

• The hosts stress that Carbine, given its sensitive work and high-profile leadership, would have robust vetting procedures, contesting the idea that the acceptance of Epstein’s money was inadvertent:

  “A technology firm handling highly sensitive 911 data…possesses the highest possible capability for vetting its investors. The decision to accept $1.5 million from Southern Trust was not a clerical oversight.”
  — Co-Investigator [11:24–11:41]

5. Pattern of Revision in Public Statements

• As evidence mounted—photographs, financial records, business ties—Barak and his associates’ narrative changed:

  “The initial defense strategy relied on total minimization…those early statements became increasingly incompatible with the verifiable evidence…”
  — Lead Investigator [12:35]

• Later, explanations shifted from brief, innocuous contacts to acknowledgments of well-paid consulting relationships, but never accompanied by concrete documentation or corroboration.

  “During this entire evolution of excuses, the defense never produced the security personnel, the scheduling staff, or the administrative assistants who could corroborate the innocent nature of these vast financial and physical entanglements.”
  — Co-Investigator [13:45]

6. Israeli Authorities: Systemic Lack of Investigation

• Despite leaks of photos, evidence of payments, and exposure of business links, Israeli government agencies failed to open any inquiries, audits, or hearings:

  “The regulatory bodies in Israel took zero action…The official story doesn't match the data when you look at the missing institutional process.”
  — Lead Investigator and Co-Investigator [14:34–14:48]

• The given reason is that no domestic crime was committed—a claim the hosts dispute, noting international precedents and standard global anti-corruption protocols:

  “The argument suggests that because the physical visits occurred in New York and the financial trusts were located offshore, the domestic regulatory bodies had no legal mandate…But that contradicts the evidence of how sovereign nations protect their financial integrity.”
  — Lead Investigator and Co-Investigator [15:27–15:39]

• The absence of even routine oversight is characterized as a systemic refusal to investigate those at the top levels of power.

7. International Contrasts

• The hosts contrast Israel’s total inaction with the active investigations pursued by the UK, France, and the US in cases involving similarly high-profile figures:

  “The United Kingdom initiated intense police inquiries into Prince Andrew's associations…French authorities aggressively pursued investigations into Epstein’s network in Paris…But in contrast…Israel has produced zero subpoenas.”
  — Lead Investigator [16:57–17:12]

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On Secrecy of Barak’s Visit:
  “The physical posture captured in the photographs…shows a deliberate physical attempt by the former prime minister to shield his identity from the cameras stationed outside the property.”
  — Lead Investigator [03:05]

• On Financial Transparency:
  “A philanthropic foundation…does not typically disperse $2.3 million for unpublished, invisible geopolitical advice.”
  — Co-Investigator [07:35]

• On Business Risk:
  “It is like a mob boss investing in a home security company. It is not just about the financial return. It is about buying access and proximity to the people running the system.”
  — Lead Investigator [11:56]

• On Institutional Accountability:
  “The documented absence of action…highlights the institutional shield surrounding a former prime minister…No parliamentary questions, no preliminary audits, no requests for the invisible Consulting research demonstrates a systemic refusal to apply standard investigative protocols…”
  — Lead Investigator [15:54]

• On the Broader Pattern:
  “The central thesis derived from this documentation is that sovereign power generates an impenetrable layer of insulation.”
  — Lead Investigator [16:44]

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• [00:28] – Introduction: Scope of Ehud Barak’s Epstein connection
• [01:54] – Description of Barak’s secretive approach to Epstein’s mansion
• [03:50] – Barak’s confirmation of Manhattan and island visits
• [05:26] – Analysis of the financial flows ($2.3 million ‘consulting’ payment)
• [09:29] – Epstein’s pattern of leveraging investments for influence
• [10:13] – $1.5 million investment in Carbine (startup tied to Barak)
• [13:05] – Evolution and contradiction in Barak’s public statements
• [14:25] – Timeline of official Israeli non-response
• [16:17] – Synthesis: Evidence of entanglement and lack of oversight
• [16:57] – Comparison to UK, French, and US investigations

---

Conclusion & Unanswered Questions

The episode closes by emphasizing the stark evidence of close ties between Barak and Epstein—photographic, financial, professional—contrasted with the total absence of institutional investigation in Israel. The investigative team poses critical open questions:

• What was the true purpose of the undocumented "consulting" work?
• What other financial connections or offshore arrangements remain hidden?
• What institutional mechanisms prevented even basic oversight or inquiries?

The hosts underscore the urgency of accountability and the ongoing nature of their investigation, promising further revelations in future episodes.

---

For full documentation and sources, the podcast directs listeners to EpsteinFiles.fm.

Transcript

[Narrator]

3 million pages of evidence. Thousands of unsealed flight logs, millions of data points, names, themes and timelines connected. You are listening to the Epstein Files, the world's first AI native investigation into the case that traditional journalism simply could not handle.

[Lead Investigator]

Foreign. Welcome to the Epstein Files. Last time we tracked Sarah Kellan Epstein's scheduler named co conspirator, full immunity recipient from the calendar she maintained to the new name she adopted. While victims she scheduled are still in litigation, today we are looking at former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak photographed entering Epstein's Manhattan mansion. Recipient of $2.3 million through Epstein Connected trusts, co investor in Epstein funded startups, and the documented relationship that has received no investigative scrutiny in Israel as part of our ongoing investigation. As always, every document and source we reference is available at Epstein Files fm. So let us start with the document. The Haaretz investigation into the 2015 Barack Epstein partnership entered seven years after Epstein's conviction, detailing the specific entities through which millions float.

[Co-Investigator]

Right, and you really have to picture this scenario for a moment. You are a former head of state. You are one of the most recognizable figures in international politics. You know that press cameras and surveillance lenses document your movements in major cities, right?

[Lead Investigator]

The visibility is constant at that level.

[Co-Investigator]

Exactly. Yet you pull a camouflage neck gator high over the bridge of your nose, you pull a dark winter hat low over your brow, and you walk up to the most heavily scrutinized private doorway in Manhattan. I mean, why? What could possibly be waiting behind those doors that is worth risking your entire legacy?

[Lead Investigator]

Well, the physical evidence released under the Epstein files Transparency act grounds that exact scenario in a very specific location. We are examining the surveillance photographs published by the Daily Mail which capture Ehud barak arriving at 9 East 71st Street.

[Co-Investigator]

Yeah, and that address is not some discreet office building in a financial district. You know, it is not a neutral meeting ground at a midtown hotel.

[Lead Investigator]

It is.

[Co-Investigator]

It is Jeffrey Epstein's private Manhattan townhouse.

[Lead Investigator]

And that residence is a critical piece of the timeline. It functioned as the central hub of Epstein's network during the years following his Florida conviction. The sheer scale of that property establishes the context for these visits.

[Co-Investigator]

You really have to understand the geography of 9 East 71st Street.

[Lead Investigator]

This is a six story, 21,000 square foot mansion. It occupies a massive footprint on the Upper east side. It stands as the largest private residence in Manhattan.

[Co-Investigator]

It's massive and it features these imposing oak doors and a highly visible main entrance that opens directly onto a busy public sidewalk. Anyone approaching those doors is doing so in full view of the street, the neighbors. And, well, given the owner's extreme notoriety, the inevitable paparazzi.

[Lead Investigator]

Which makes the physical posture captured in the photographs so. So vital to the evidentiary record. The framing shows a deliberate physical attempt by the former prime minister to shield his identity from the cameras stationed outside the property.

[Co-Investigator]

The official story doesn't match the data when we cross examine that specific timeline and that posture. The public position maintained by Barack's representatives has been that these were entirely legitimate social and business meetings.

[Lead Investigator]

Right. They characterize it as standard networking for a former head of state.

[Co-Investigator]

But you have to consider the severe disparity between the highly visible setting of that entrance and the extreme measures taken to obscure his presence. A person attending a standard geopolitical strategy session does not dress like they are attempting to evade a perimeter patrol.

[Lead Investigator]

I'm looking at the document here, and it specifically says. The document specifically states that Barak confirmed visiting Epstein's residences on multiple occasions, including the New York mansion and Epstein's private island.

[Co-Investigator]

And that public acknowledgment arrived only after the physical evidence made total denial impossible. The timeline of these images serves as the central anchor of the documentary record.

[Lead Investigator]

Right. These specific photographs were taken years after the 2008 Florida plea deal. That places the visits squarely in the period when Epstein was a registered sex offender.

[Co-Investigator]

Barack was not visiting an associate facing mere allegations or rumors. He was visiting a man who had already served time. A man legally mandated to register his status with local law enforcement.

[Lead Investigator]

And the admission covers not just the Manhattan property, but little St. James. That is a location entirely isolated from normal business corridors and thoroughly implicated in the trafficking network.

[Co-Investigator]

That contradicts the evidence presented in his initial defensive statements, which really attempted to minimize the depth of the association. Think about the logistics required for that kind of travel.

[Lead Investigator]

It's extensive.

[Co-Investigator]

A visit to a private Caribbean island requires deliberate planning, dedicated travel days, and a level of personal intimacy that extends far, far beyond a casual business relationship. You do not accidentally end up on Little St. James while doing standard consulting work.

[Lead Investigator]

No, you don't. And the physical presence at both the primary urban hub and the isolated island stronghold demonstrates a comprehensive integration into Epstein's private sphere. Moving from the physical doorstep to the financial architecture reveals that the relationship was not merely social.

[Co-Investigator]

Right. The money trail.

[Lead Investigator]

The records released under the Eckstein Files Transparency act trace a massive transfer of wealth directly to the former prime minister. The ledgers show Ehud Barak received approximately $2.3 million, but it did not come

[Co-Investigator]

from a standard corporate payroll, which is the crucial point here. It was routed Through a philanthropic entity known as the Wexner foundation, which was a trust deeply intertwined with Epstein's financial network.

[Lead Investigator]

I'm looking at the document here and it specifically says. The document specifically states that the payments were routed through a trust structure associated with Epstein's financial network, with the stated purpose listed as consulting.

[Co-Investigator]

Look at what they are leaving out when explaining the mechanics of this transaction. The stated purpose for this $2.3 million transfer was categorized broadly as consulting services and research to be conducted between 2004 and 2006.

[Lead Investigator]

Right. Consulting and research.

[Co-Investigator]

But in any standard corporate architecture, a multi million dollar consulting arrangement generates a massive undeniable paper trail of deliverables. You would expect to see binding contracts detailed, invoicing, quarterly progress reports, and, you know, extensive published research reflecting a 2,000,000 DOL valuation.

[Lead Investigator]

And the paper trail regarding those deliverables is entirely non existent in the public record. The funds originated from the trust structure, moved through the banking system and landed in accounts accessible to Barack.

[Co-Investigator]

Yet no research paper, no strategic advisory document, and no policy brief has ever been published to justify the expense. We have mapped the entire $2.3 million pipeline from the Epstein linked origin point to the destination. And the only missing element is the actual work product.

[Lead Investigator]

The official claim from Barack's camp maintains that this $2.3 million payment was legitimate compensation for his strategic advice and geopolitical expertise.

[Co-Investigator]

Right. They lean on his resume.

[Lead Investigator]

Exactly. The defense rests heavily on his status as a former leader, arguing that his unique global insights command a premium market rate. They assert that the arrangement was a standard advisory role, completely severed from any of the illicit activities occurring simultaneously within the Epstein network.

[Co-Investigator]

The official story doesn't match the data when you analyze the actual mechanics of that payout. A philanthropic foundation dedicated to educational and leadership initiatives does not typically disperse $2.3 million for unpublished, invisible geopolitical advice.

[Lead Investigator]

It just doesn't happen.

[Co-Investigator]

The phrase used in the ledgers is standard operating procedure for masking wealth transfers that lack tangible commercial deliverables. Think of a philanthropic trust like a financial invisibility cloak.

[Lead Investigator]

That's a great way to put it.

[Co-Investigator]

If Epstein pays a politician directly from his personal bank account, regulatory alarms go off immediately. But if the money flows through a respected charity foundation and then that foundation pays the politician for research, the capital appears completely clean.

[Lead Investigator]

The structure points toward a system designed to obscure the true nature of the financial relationship. They utilize the foundation's respected public face to legitimize capital flowing from a compromised network to a powerful political figure.

[Co-Investigator]

And the documents show this Is not an isolated tactic. It brings us to a documented historical pattern within Epstein's operations. The records show a consistent strategy of using seed funding, Venture capital and startup investments to build leverage.

[Lead Investigator]

Right. He systematically integrated himself into the financial lives of scientists, politicians and business leaders. He did this by positioning himself as an indispensable source of capital for their passion projects and corporate ventures.

[Co-Investigator]

By creating that mutual financial dependency, Epstein established a protective barrier around his illicit activities. When you trace the history of his investments, they rarely function as standard venture capital plays seeking purely commercial returns.

[Lead Investigator]

No. They serve as a mechanism to bind influential figures to his network.

[Co-Investigator]

Exactly. He ensured that their financial success, their startup dreams and their corporate boards became hopelessly entangled with his own continued freedom and and social acceptance.

[Lead Investigator]

And the chronological progression of Barack's involvement with the technology startup Carbine illustrates this pattern perfectly. Carbine was established as a company focused on advanced emergency 911 call handling technology.

[Co-Investigator]

Yeah. The software was designed to integrate live video feeds and precise geolocation data directly into emergency dispatch centers. And Ehud Barak stepped into the role of chairman. Lending his immense credibility and his elite security background to the company's public profile.

[Lead Investigator]

But the timeline of the funding rounds reveals exactly how the Epstein network penetrated that specific corporate structure. A tech company building complex 911 integration software requires significant capital to scale its operations and deploy its technology to municipalities.

[Co-Investigator]

According to the corporate ledgers released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, A massive capital infusion of approximately $1.5 million was accepted into Carbines books. And that money originated directly from an Epstein connected funding source.

[Lead Investigator]

The specific entity utilized for this transaction was Southern Trust Co. Inc. This was an offshore vehicle firmly under Epstein's control.

[Co-Investigator]

And the money entered the corporate accounts while Barack was actively serving as chairman. This means the former head of state was overseeing a board that approved the acceptance of venture capital from a convicted sex offender.

[Lead Investigator]

The transaction was finalized quietly and it remained completely hidden until investigative journalists exposed the Epstein linked funding source. The official claim from the defense argues that Carbine is a legitimate technology company with genuine commercial applications completely independent of Epstein's influence.

[Co-Investigator]

They maintain that the investment was an arm's length business transaction handled by corporate officers and that Barack's role as chairman did not equate to a personal endorsement of every single financial backer.

[Lead Investigator]

And to their credit, the company eventually announced it would return the funds. But only only following the immense public fallout.

[Co-Investigator]

Look at what they are leaving out regarding the corporate due diligence process. A technology firm handling highly sensitive 911 data chaired by a former military and intelligence leader possesses the highest possible capability for vetting its investors.

[Lead Investigator]

They absolutely have those resources.

[Co-Investigator]

The decision to accept $1.5 million from Southern Trust was not a clerical oversight. It required executive approval, legal sign off and a deliberate waiver of the massive reputational risks associated with Epstein's criminal record.

[Lead Investigator]

It is like a mob boss investing in a home security company. It is not just about the financial return. It is about buying access and proximity to the people running the system.

[Co-Investigator]

That contradicts the evidence of how tightly controlled these funding networks actually were. You cannot separate the chairman of the board from the primary seed investors. Especially when that chairman has a pre existing multimillion dollar personal relationship with the financier providing the capital.

[Lead Investigator]

The carbyed investment mirrors the established Epstein blueprint exactly. Injecting cash into a legitimate high profile enterprise to secure a permanent seat at the table with the powerful individuals running it.

[Co-Investigator]

And the documents released under the Epstein Falls Transparency act require us to map the precise evolution of Ehud Barak's public statements. As all of these facts surfaced, the initial defense strategy relied on total minimization.

[Lead Investigator]

Right? Early on, the relationship was characterized as brief, professional and entirely unremarkable. But as the documentary record expanded, those early statements became increasingly incompatible with the verifiable evidence of island flights, philanthropic trusts and corporate boardrooms.

[Co-Investigator]

The shifting narrative is a critical piece of the evidentiary trail. When the Daily Mail published the photographs of his obscured face at the Manhattan townhouse, the defense morphed.

[Lead Investigator]

They had to acknowledge the visits, suddenly framing them as routine check ins with a financial advisor.

[Co-Investigator]

The story was revised backward to accommodate the undeniable photographic reality, exposing the initial emissions as deliberate attempts to control the damage and limit public exposure.

[Lead Investigator]

And then the narrative fractured again. When the $2.3 million Wexner foundation payment was exposed, the explanation shifted from a casual advisory relationship to an admission of a highly lucrative multi year consulting contract.

[Co-Investigator]

Look at what they are leaving out. During this entire evolution of excuses, the defense never produced the security personnel, the scheduling staff, or the administrative assistants who could corroborate the innocent nature of these vast financial and physical entanglements.

[Lead Investigator]

Right. A former Prime Minister traveling to a foreign country to visit a convicted felon requires security protocols, advanced team clearances and diplomatic notifications.

[Co-Investigator]

A head of state does not just grab a taxi from JFK and knock on a door in Manhattan anonymously. The absolute silence from the protective details and administrative handlers indicates a concerted effort to keep these specific meetings entirely off the official books.

[Lead Investigator]

Which leads directly to the non response micro timeline. From Israeli authorities, we have tracked the chronological sequence of the government's reaction to each new revelation.

[Co-Investigator]

When the photographs of barak at the 71st street mansion leaked, the regulatory bodies in Israel took zero action.

[Lead Investigator]

None at all. When the $2.3 million payment was traced to his accounts, the financial oversight committees initiated zero reviews.

[Co-Investigator]

The official story doesn't match the data when you look at the missing institutional process. When the Carbyne investment links were exposed showing a former head of state commingling corporate funds with the convicted trafficker, the securities regulators remained entirely paralyzed.

[Lead Investigator]

The authority to open an inquiry to issue a simple subpoena for the missing consulting documents rested firmly with the Attorney General's Office and relevant NESSET committees. Yet the documented reality is an unbroken continuum of total inaction.

[Co-Investigator]

The official claim relies on the presumption that no direct domestic crime was committed, thereby removing the jurisdiction of Israeli authorities.

[Lead Investigator]

Right. The argument suggests that because the physical visits occurred in New York and the financial trusts were located offshore, the domestic regulatory bodies had no legal mandate to compel testimony or audit the financial arrangements.

[Co-Investigator]

They frame the non response as a strict by the book adherence to jurisdictional boundaries. But that contradicts the evidence of how sovereign nations protect their financial integrity. Financial crimes, corruption probes and ethics violations cross international borders constantly.

[Lead Investigator]

The documented absence of action from the oversight committees highlights the institutional shield surrounding a former prime minister. The absolute void of inquiry. No parliamentary questions, no preliminary audits, no requests for the invisible Consulting research demonstrates a systemic refusal to apply standard investigative protocols to a figure at the apex of the political hierarchy.

[Co-Investigator]

Synthesizing the evidence from the files, the documentary record establishes a concrete reality. The fritographs confirm Barack's physical presence at the properties during Epstein's period as a registered sex offender.

[Lead Investigator]

The banking records trace $2.3 million flowing from an Epstein linked trust directly into Barack's control.

[Co-Investigator]

The corporate ledgers prove that an Epstein Shell Co. Pumped $1.5 million into a startup chaired by Barack. And the public statements show a clear pattern of revision and minimization.

[Lead Investigator]

The central thesis derived from this documentation is that sovereign power generates an impenetrable layer of insulation. When we contrast the Israeli non response with international precedents, the disparity is stark.

[Co-Investigator]

The United Kingdom initiated intense police inquiries into Prince Andrew's associations, forcing a public reckoning. French authorities aggressively pursued investigations into Epstein's network in Paris, looking closely at figures like Jean Luc Brunel and the United

[Lead Investigator]

States successfully prosecuted Ghislaine Maxwell and dismantled the remaining financial infrastructure. But in contrast, despite possessing a former prime minister with verified financial ties, photographic evidence of hidden visits and a business relationship funded through the Epstein Network. Israel has produced zero subpoenas.

[Co-Investigator]

The documented record shows zero hearings and zero official statements of concern from any regulatory body. The absolute refusal to investigate is the defining characteristic of this specific file.

[Lead Investigator]

The verified documents prove the relationship the money and the corporate entanglements. Beyond any dispute, the unanswered questions that remain are profound. What was the actual nature of the invisible consulting work?

[Co-Investigator]

What other financial connections remain locked inside sealed offshore registries? And what specific institutional mechanisms were engaged to ensure that no regulatory body ever asked those questions on the official record?

[Lead Investigator]

We must evaluate the evidence for what it demonstrates about accountability standards. The documentary trail shows a progression of minimized truths, vast sums of untraceable consulting fees and a complete failure of oversight.

[Co-Investigator]

Remember, this is an ongoing investigation and everything we cited is sourced at Epsteinfiles FM.

[Lead Investigator]

Next time on the Epstein Files, File 121, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell and the name's victims kept repeating.

[Narrator]

You have just heard an analysis of the official record. Every claim name and date mentioned in this episode is backed by primary source documents. You can view the original files for yourself at epsteinfiles fm. If you value this data first approach to journalism, please leave a five star review wherever you're listening right now. It helps keep this investigation visible. We'll see you in the next file.