← The Epstein Files
The Epstein Files
File 137 - Chopra, Woody Allen, and Steve Bannon Were All on His Calendar in 2019
00:21:59
Loading summary
Transcript188 lines
- [00:05]
A
3 million pages of evidence. Thousands of unsealed flight logs. Millions of data points, names, themes and timelines connected. You are listening to the Epstein Files, the world's first AI native investigation into the case that traditional journalism simply could not handle.
- [00:31]
B
Welcome back to the Epstein Files. Last time we looked at file 136, the defender. Today we are analyzing file 137, God is a construct. Cute girls are real. As always, every document and source we reference is available at epsteinfiles fm. So let us start with the EFTA email archive, because those communications document Deepak Chopra's role in Epstein's patronage network. And the record shows continued association after his 2008 conviction.
- [00:57]
C
Right. To establish our factual baseline for this audit, we are grounding our analysis entirely in the documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The EFTA.
- [01:07]
B
Yeah. Specifically focusing on the period from 2016 to 2019.
- [01:10]
C
Exactly. We are utilizing device extractions, contact databases, email threads, and highly detailed flight and appointment itineraries.
- [01:19]
B
So we are evaluating the physical and digital footprint left behind by these associations, tracing the data points chronologically to reconstruct the infrastructure of access that operated during this specific post conviction window.
- [01:29]
C
And we are looking strictly at what the paper trail proves versus what the public narrative claims. The tension here comes directly from the documented facts.
- [01:36]
B
Right. So if you look at the timeline we have uploaded to the site, we begin with the documentary record establishing a continuous association long after the 2008 conviction.
- [01:46]
C
Because the public narrative suggests that after the initial criminal charges, Epstein was exiled from polite society.
- [01:52]
B
Yeah, but the documents show a highly structured, meticulously recorded sequence of appointments. Take the schedule for November 2016, cataloged as document E half T00285276.
- [02:07]
C
Right. And we should clarify for the listener, this is not a vague calendar, Andrew.
- [02:10]
B
No, not at all. The itinerary lists specific phone bathes and in person appointments with Deepak Chopra alongside major financial figures like Leon Black.
- [02:19]
C
And it is important to note the geographic data in that specific schedule. It details travel arrangements between Paris, Riyadh and New York.
- [02:26]
B
Right. That geographic spread indicates a massive global operational scope during the exact time these meetings with Topra were occurring.
- [02:33]
C
Yeah. The records show this was not an isolated intersection of schedules. When you review the itineraries released under the efta, they do not record accidental run ins.
- [02:42]
B
Exactly. They document deliberate, coordinated appointments managed by
- [02:47]
C
executive staff moving forward from the end of 2016 into early 2017. Document EFT A00285334 outlines the schedule for February.
- [02:57]
B
And document EFT000285357 outlines July of the same year.
- [03:04]
C
Right. Both of these itineraries demonstrate continued scheduled meetings involving Chopra and leon black.
- [03:10]
B
The July 2017 document is particularly granular. You know, it lists flight numbers, record locators and personal reminders.
- [03:17]
C
It embeds these meetings within a highly organized logistical framework. This requires executive assistance coordinating across multiple time zones.
- [03:24]
B
Wait, I want to emphasize something for the listener regarding that timeline. July 2017.
- [03:29]
C
Right.
- [03:29]
B
That is nearly a decade after the 2008 conviction. The documents show this was not just a lingering connection from the 1990s or early 2000s that had fizzled out.
- [03:37]
C
No, they were actively coordinating logistics that recently.
- [03:40]
B
Some might wonder if this could just be an administrative error. You know, a secretary copying and pasting an old contact list into a new
- [03:47]
C
template that does not add up when you look at the supporting logistical data.
- [03:50]
B
Right.
- [03:51]
C
You do not generate flight numbers and live record locators from a copy and paste error. This requires active booking and confirmation.
- [03:58]
B
Exactly. Furthermore, the timeline continues to show an established pattern of association as we move into the end of 2017.
- [04:05]
C
Document EFT 00285401 details the schedule for November 2017.
- [04:11]
B
Yeah. And it includes reminders for appointments with Chopra, the pianist Charlie Albright and the attorney Jack Goldberger.
- [04:17]
C
This specific schedule tracks move between New York and Palm beach, and it relies on commercial flights like Delta and JetBlue alongside private aviation arrangements.
- [04:26]
B
So the persistence of these scheduled interactions over consecutive months indicates a maintained professional or social relationship across multiple geographic hubs.
- [04:34]
C
And the pace of these meetings actually accelerates as we examine the records for 2018 and 2019.
- [04:39]
B
Right. If you check documents EFT000002855, third zero, and EFTA00285597, which cover January Chopra's place in schedules alongside figures such as Woody Allen, Steve Bannon and Tom Pritzker.
- [04:55]
C
Then we look at document EFT000285728.
- [04:59]
B
Yeah, that one confirms scheduled meetings with Chirpra in April 2019, that is mere
- [05:04]
C
months before Epstein's final arrest in July 2019.
- [05:08]
B
The proximity of these meetings to the total collapse of the network demonstrates an ongoing active integration into this specific circle of influence right up until the end.
- [05:19]
C
Here's the discrepancy. Chopra's public statements have historically minimized or denied any substantial association with the network post conviction.
- [05:28]
B
Right. The public narrative often frames any contact as incidental, perhaps a brief encounter at a crowded conference.
- [05:34]
C
However, this dense multi year documentary record outlines a sustained Scheduled relationship?
- [05:41]
B
Yeah. The sheer volume of recorded appointments contradicts the assertion of a distant or non existent relationship.
- [05:47]
C
When an individual appears repeatedly across multiple years of private schedules interspersed with top tier financial and political figures, it establishes a functional baseline of association.
- [05:57]
B
The documents prove a sustained integration into the scheduling apparatus of the network.
- [06:01]
C
This is inconsistent with the public narrative.
- [06:03]
B
Exactly. We are not talking about two guys who happen to grab coffee at the same hotel lobby.
- [06:09]
C
No, we are talking about years of executive level coordination.
- [06:13]
B
But okay, anyone can be written into a schedule. Physical itineraries prove the intent to meet, or at least the logistical planning of a meeting. Right, but what about direct communication? Do we have proof they were actively talking behind the scenes?
- [06:26]
C
We need to pivot from the schedule of physical appearances to the digital paper trail contained within the EFTA email archive.
- [06:34]
B
Right, and we do have that documentation. The digital forensic evidence proves direct unmediated communication channels existed.
- [06:41]
C
If you examine the device extraction report labeled evidence ID NYC024328F4, which is filed as document ET007277, it confirms contact data was embedded directly into the network's hardware.
- [06:56]
B
Yeah. This extraction recovered records from both the Mac address book and the SNAP databases of devices recovered during the investigation.
- [07:03]
C
For the listener who might not be familiar with forensic extractions, we should explain why that matters.
- [07:07]
B
Right. Having someone's number in a phone is one thing, but what does a Skype database extraction actually tell us about the nature of the relationship?
- [07:16]
C
A standard contact list might just be an aggregation of business cards gathered over decades. Yeah, but active Skype databases and synchronized Mac address books from primary devices indicate a live operational communication channel.
- [07:29]
B
It places Chopra's direct contact information firmly within the active digital ecosystem of the operation.
- [07:34]
C
Exactly. This is not archival data. This is the hardware used for day to day coordination.
- [07:40]
B
And the nature of these digital interactions is brought into sharp focus when we examine the specific email threads recovered in the archive.
- [07:47]
C
Right. Document EFT 00645142 is a very specific piece of evidence.
- [07:53]
B
Yeah. It contains a 24 page email thread involving Chopar, a writer named Brad, Bartholomew and Epstein.
- [07:59]
C
They are engaging in highly abstract discussions.
- [08:02]
B
The thread documents intense debates on the nature of consciousness, scientific models of reality and philosophical perspectives derived from the Upanishads.
- [08:10]
C
We should provide some context for the listener regarding the Upanishads.
- [08:14]
B
Right.
- [08:14]
C
These are late Vedic Sanskrit texts that form the foundational core of Hindu philosophy, dealing heavily with meditation, philosophy and the nature of ultimate reality.
- [08:24]
B
So the documents show a convicted financial criminal engaging in deeply esoteric 24 page philosophical debates about ancient mysticism and quantum consciousness with one of the most famous spiritual figures in the world.
- [08:38]
C
You have to ask yourself, why is this financier debating ancient Sanskrit philosophy via email?
- [08:45]
B
Right. We often think of elite networking as purely transactional trading stock tips or real estate leads.
- [08:50]
C
But the EFTA archive reveals a completely different currency.
- [08:53]
B
Yeah. This level of communication indicates a relationship anchored in sustained intellectual discourse rather than simple social pleasantries.
- [09:01]
C
It is about intellectual validation.
- [09:04]
B
Exactly. But the archive also contains evidence linking this intellectual discourse to specific commercial ventures.
- [09:10]
C
It was not just philosophy, it was business.
- [09:12]
B
Right. If we look at document EFT00817999, it explicitly references Chirpra alongside his book Superjeans.
- [09:21]
C
This indicates an active awareness and potentially the promotion of his commercial literary publications within the network.
- [09:27]
B
But the financial integration goes much deeper than circ a book.
- [09:31]
C
Yeah. Document EFT000B04532 is one of the most critical files in this audit.
- [09:39]
B
It is a 20 page presentation regarding a corporate and community well being platform called jio.
- [09:45]
C
We should break down this JIO presentation because it perfectly illustrates the intersection of spirituality and corporate networking.
- [09:51]
B
Right. JIO was framed as a comprehensive well being platform, an app and a service designed to integrate into corporate wellness programs.
- [09:58]
C
The 20 page presentation recovered in the archive features quotes directly from Chopra and outlines how the platform would integrate into user wellness profiles and corporate marketplaces.
- [10:08]
B
So why would a 20 page deck for a spiritual wellness app be sitting in the private digital archive of this specific financial network?
- [10:17]
C
The documents show a clear intersection between spiritual philosophy and corporate wellness initiatives within the communication network.
- [10:23]
B
We must analyze why the public narrative of limited association contradicts the frequency and specificity of these communications.
- [10:31]
C
Right. The records do not merely show passing introductions.
- [10:34]
B
No. They document integration into business presentations like GEO and participation in extensive philosophical email threads.
- [10:42]
C
The paper trail indicates that the intellectual and commercial output of these figures was actively circulated, reviewed and utilized by the network.
- [10:51]
B
That does not add up when cross referenced against the omission of this post. 2008 Financial and social support from the public record.
- [10:58]
C
When public figures are asked about their association, the standard response is to claim they were unaware of any underlying crimes or that the relationship was brief and superficial.
- [11:07]
B
But a 24 page email thread about the nature of reality coupled with a 20 page corporate pitch deck for a wellness platform is not superficial.
- [11:16]
C
Exactly. We are assessing what information regarding conferences, speaking engagements and business integrations is actively being withheld or downplayed.
- [11:25]
B
The EFTA archive provides a documented counternarrative to the public Denials.
- [11:29]
C
It proves that the network functioned as a distribution and discussion hub for these specific intellectual properties and wellness platforms.
- [11:37]
B
To understand the function of this relationship, we must zoom out to the broader architecture of the intellectual patronage documented in the EFTA files.
- [11:46]
C
Chopra was not an anomaly. He was a node in a highly systematic structure.
- [11:51]
B
Right. If you look at the JMail contact list, it provides the historical baseline for this operational strategy.
- [11:57]
C
The extraction catalogs direct contacts with prominent figures across various disciplines.
- [12:02]
B
We are talking about the linguist and philosopher Noam Chomsky, the theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss, the cognitive scientist Marvin Minsky.
- [12:11]
C
This establishes a documented precedent.
- [12:13]
B
Yeah. The network actively targeted and cultivated relationships with high level academics and public intellectuals.
- [12:20]
C
Think of this mechanism like a compromised computer system.
- [12:23]
B
Right.
- [12:23]
C
In cybersecurity, you do not always hack a system with brute force. Sometimes you use social phishing. You compromise a trusted node to gain access to the broader network.
- [12:33]
B
And the documents show a step by step methodology where financial patronage of scientific and spiritual conferences served as the primary access infrastructure.
- [12:43]
C
Funding at conference provided the initial point of entry.
- [12:46]
B
Yeah. That funding subsequently led to sponsored speaking engagements.
- [12:50]
C
Those engagements led to private dinners, which led to direct recruitment into the social orbit.
- [12:56]
B
It is the architectural equivalent of building an art gallery. But instead of collecting paintings, the network was collecting people.
- [13:03]
C
The documents prove this was a standardized operational procedure for acquiring association with authoritative figures.
- [13:10]
B
You buy a ticket, you sponsor a table, you fund a lab, and suddenly you have purchased the proximity of a Nobel laureate or a spiritual icon.
- [13:17]
C
We must contrast the pre 2008 historical baseline of this patronage with the evidence of its continuation post conviction.
- [13:25]
B
Right. Before 2008, the funding of science might have been viewed as standard billionaire philanthropy.
- [13:30]
C
But the current EFT evidence proves this exact same infrastructure was utilized to launder social legitimacy after the criminal record became public knowledge.
- [13:39]
B
By maintaining close associations with recognized figures in science and spirituality, the network actively projected an open aura of academic and philosophical credibility.
- [13:51]
C
The documents show this legitimacy laundering was a core function of the continued scheduling and communication.
- [13:57]
B
Legitimacy laundering. I want to emphasize that term for the listener.
- [14:00]
C
Right.
- [14:01]
B
Just like financial money laundering takes dirty cash and passes it through legitimate businesses to make it clean, legitimacy laundering takes a compromised reputation and passes it through trusted public intellectuals.
- [14:13]
C
When you are seen walking into a dinner with Noam Chomsky or debating consciousness with Deepak Chopra, you are borrowing their moral and intellectual authority.
- [14:22]
B
The public assumes, consciously or not, that if these brilliant ethical thinkers are associating with you, you must be acceptable.
- [14:29]
C
That is the exact mechanism documented in the file.
- [14:32]
B
Yeah, but it raises a Structural question. Does the pattern of intellectual cultivation that succeeded with scientific figures like Chomsky apply identically to spiritual figures like Chopra?
- [14:42]
C
We must evaluate if the mechanism of utilizing authority for social cover operates the same way across different disciplines.
- [14:49]
B
Right. Theoretical physics and spiritual wellness seem like opposite ends of the spectrum.
- [14:54]
C
The documentary evidence regarding the GEO presentation and the consciousness email threads suggest the methodology was identical.
- [15:01]
B
The network extracted value from their association with spiritual wellness, just as it did from theoretical physics or linguistics.
- [15:09]
C
A physicist lends you the aura of
- [15:11]
B
objective genius, and a spiritual leader lends you the aura of moral transcendence and healing.
- [15:16]
C
For a network attempting to rehabilitate an image marred by severe exploitation, the aura of spiritual wellness is an incredibly valuable asset to acquire.
- [15:26]
B
The analysis of the records indicates that Chopra's relationship was not categorically different from other nodes in the network.
- [15:32]
C
It functioned exactly as the established pattern dictates, trading spiritual and wellness authority for financial and social patronage.
- [15:39]
B
The integration of his platforms into the network's documents, combined with the recurring schedule appearances, aligns perfectly with the standard cultivation strategy.
- [15:49]
C
The infrastructure treated intellectual capital, regardless of the specific discipline, as an asset to be acquired, displayed and leveraged.
- [15:57]
B
We must now pivot from the verified documents to the documented voids in the record.
- [16:02]
C
Right. As forensic auditors, we are trained to look not just at what is on the page, but at what is visibly missing.
- [16:08]
B
We are analyzing what the sources are failing to reveal.
- [16:11]
C
Reveal? There are significant gaps in the available data that require forensic attention.
- [16:15]
B
Specifically, we must identify the undisclosed sealed court filings that continue to reference network participants without public disclosure.
- [16:23]
C
The sealing of documents is a documented institutional decision.
- [16:27]
B
Yeah. Furthermore, the JMail archive indicates there are over 1,900 IFSA communications that have been identified but remain unredacted and inaccessible to the public.
- [16:37]
C
These are not lost emails. They are files that exist in the evidentiary database but have been shielded by redaction requests and legal barriers.
- [16:45]
B
We do not have documentation for the contents of those 1900 communications.
- [16:50]
C
That brings us to the most critical unresolved question documented in our audit. The accountability discrepancy.
- [16:56]
B
Right. If you look at the FBI investigative records, as well as the extracted contact databases we just discussed, they clearly reference Chopra and numerous other intellectuals as active network participants.
- [17:08]
C
The itineraries place them at the meetings.
- [17:10]
B
The digital forensics place them in the communication loops.
- [17:13]
C
Yet the documentation shows this has resulted in zero public or formal accountability for the vast majority of these individuals.
- [17:20]
B
The paper trail proves participation and patronage, but the legal and institutional records show a complete absence of subsequent inquiry.
- [17:28]
C
This represents A massive documented gap in the institutional response.
- [17:32]
B
If the documentary record proves extensive post conviction association scheduled meetings in 2017, 2018 and 2019 and digital integration into business decks like Jio, the absence of formal investigation requires analysis.
- [17:45]
C
We do not have documentation for any grand jury subpoenas or formal inquiries directed at the intellectual nodes of this network.
- [17:52]
B
Think about how standard investigations operate.
- [17:55]
C
Right.
- [17:55]
B
If a narcotics syndicate is dismantled, law enforcement audits, the accountants, the lawyers, the logistics coordinators and the prominent figures who provided social cover or financial integration.
- [18:06]
C
But here, the evidence proves the infrastructure existed. The funding mechanisms, the synchronized schedules, the shared business presentations. But the corresponding legal scrutiny is entirely missing from the public record.
- [18:19]
B
Why does a 20 page business presentation found on a criminal's private server not trigger a standard financial inquiry?
- [18:26]
C
We must analyze the institutional factors that may be actively preventing disclosure and formal accountability.
- [18:32]
B
Yeah. This involves examining the legal and social mechanisms that protect high status individuals from standard investigative procedures.
- [18:39]
C
The documented use of sealed filings and redaction requests creates a legalized barrier to transparency.
- [18:45]
B
The institutional complicity is not theoretical. It is documented in the systemic legal decisions to seal records and limit the scope of the formal investigations to a highly narrow set of participants. Completely ignoring the infrastructure of intellectual patronage.
- [19:02]
C
This is a crucial point for the listener to grasp. We are not dealing with a conspiracy theory.
- [19:07]
B
No. We are looking at documented legal maneuvers.
- [19:09]
C
The decision to seal a court filing is a procedural action taken by a judge, often at the request of high powered attorneys representing these intellectual nodes.
- [19:18]
B
It is a feature of the legal system working exactly as designed for those who can afford it.
- [19:23]
C
The institutional complicity is written into the docket numbers.
- [19:26]
B
Synthesizing the evidence from the EFLA itineraries, the device extractions and the email archives reveals a clear operational model.
- [19:33]
C
The central thesis supported by the documents is that public intellectuals and spiritual celebrities were systematically cultivated as social validators.
- [19:41]
B
The records proved the existence of a quid pro quo infrastructure where access, logistical coordination and funding were exchanged for the aura of legitimacy.
- [19:50]
C
This infrastructure operated successfully for years.
- [19:53]
B
Yeah. It allowed the network to function globally, moving between Riyadh, Paris and New York long after the primary figure was supposedly a pariah.
- [20:02]
C
And importantly, this infrastructure has actively shielded its participants from formal investigation.
- [20:08]
B
The legitimacy they provided acted as a deterrent against scrutiny.
- [20:12]
C
We need to establish exactly what the verified documents prove regarding post conviction association.
- [20:18]
B
Right. The records confirm integration into business presentations like jio.
- [20:22]
C
They confirm participation in documented communications regarding science and spirituality. Specifically, the extensive Upanishads email thread and
- [20:31]
B
the itineraries prove a highly scheduled association from 2016 through April of 2019, demonstrating continued coordinated engagement well after the criminal background was public knowledge.
- [20:42]
C
The documentary evidence is definitive regarding the existence, frequency and depth of the relationship.
- [20:47]
B
The tension lies in these documented facts contrasted against a complete lack of official inquiry.
- [20:52]
C
We have the paper trail of the physical itineraries.
- [20:55]
B
We have the extracted Mac address book and Skype data.
- [20:59]
C
We have the philosophical email threads and the corporate well being decks.
- [21:03]
B
What remains unanswered is why no formal accountability has followed this mountain of evidence.
- [21:08]
C
We still do not know what the sealed court filings contain.
- [21:11]
B
No. Nor do we know the full unredacted scope of the intellectual defenders cultivated through this infrastructure hidden within those 1900 missing communications.
- [21:21]
C
Next time on the Epstein Files.
- [21:28]
A
You have just heard an analysis of the official record. Every claim, name and date mentioned in this episode is backed by primary source documents. You can view the original files for yourself at epsteinfiles fm. If you value this data first approach to journalism. Please leave a five star review wherever you're listening right now. It helps keep this investigation visible. We'll see you in the next file.