The Spending Shift, Model Mayhem, and Wrong on Warsh? 7/31/26

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Exchange (CNBC)

Episode: The Spending Shift, Model Mayhem, and Wrong on Warsh?
Date: July 31, 2026
Host: Kelly Evans

---

Episode Overview

This episode of The Exchange dives into several of the day’s biggest economic and business stories: the shifting landscape of tech sector spending, the market’s ongoing debate about the Federal Reserve’s credibility under Chair Kevin Warsh, and the developing model mayhem in AI cybersecurity. Also featured: analysis on Japan’s currency intervention, controversy around FIFA’s proposed private investment sale, a landmark legal fight over prediction markets, and the latest on hyperscaler dominance in the tech sector.

---

Key Topics & Insights

---

1. Tech Market Spending Shifts and Opportunities

Guest: Steven Whiting, Chief Investment Strategist, CIO Group

Timestamps: [01:54]–[08:09]

• Hardware vs. Software Sentiment

  • Hardware (semiconductors, tech hardware) comprises ~30% of S&P market cap: “This is really the market saying that 30% of all future US corporate profits are going to be tech hardware makers.” (Whiting, [02:00])
  • Cautions against assuming this high share is sustainable — last seen at the tech bubble’s peak in 2000.

• Capex Surge and Cyclicality

  • Hyperscalers’ Capex plans: Amazon up, Apple down. Overall industry estimates are "firming up" for next year.
  • Profits are robust for semis, but many cyclical, commoditized sectors (e.g., DRAM) could be vulnerable: “Just because everything’s levitating doesn’t mean long-term growth is guaranteed.” (Whiting, [03:22])

• Software’s Undervalued Position

  • Despite 15% profit growth, software stocks underperformed (-20% return over past year): “[You] can't reconcile that when profits are up 15%.” (Whiting, [05:12])
  • Whiting argues this disconnect from fundamentals is a buying opportunity—mentions Microsoft as an “incredible” example.

• Macro Strategy Takeaway

  • Bullish on next wave of Capex, but “cautious on the receivers of that capital” and sees opportunity in rebounding software sector.

---

2. Fed Policy & Market Credibility Discussion: Is Warsh 'Winging It'?

Panel:

• Aditya Barve (Head of US Economics, Bank of America)

• Greg Ip (Chief Economics Commentator, Wall Street Journal)

• Steve Liesman (CNBC Sr. Economics Reporter)
  Timestamps: [08:27]–[17:15]

• Fed’s Dovish Pause and Internal Debate

  • Three regional Fed presidents dissented, wanting a hike; nine voted to hold steady.
  • Concerns centered on inflation’s persistence (“too high for too long”) and need for “policy restraint.” (Lori Logan, paraphrased by Liesman, [08:27])

• Communication Concerns & Market Jitters

  • Greg Ip criticizes Chair Warsh’s approach: “The connective tissue between [price stability] and not raising rates is completely missing... [The Fed] is the most important player in the game...and markets need to understand what is driving those decisions.” (Ip, [11:38])
  • Market response: Short-term yields fell on easier-Fed expectations, but long-term rates and inflation break-evens rose, a combination “no Fed chairman could be happy with.” (Ip, [16:08])

• Fiscal Policy & Yield Curve Debate

  • Disagreement over whether fiscal deficits or Fed messaging are driving yields higher. Ip argues: “It's very hard to actually tell a coherent story why fiscal policy should have anything to do with what [the Fed] is doing or saying.” (Ip, [13:24])
  • Aditya Barve: “The way you bring the [fiscal] problem to the fore is not by creating uncertainty about whether you're willing to hit your inflation target.” (Barve, [15:20])

• Inflation Expectations

  • Ip: “Let me just say inflation expectations are not unanchored right now.” (Ip, [16:08])

---

3. AI Security ‘Model Mayhem’: Calls for Regulation & a ‘Kill Switch’

Reporting: Kate Rooney (CNBC; [20:00]–[22:56])

Expert Interview: Ivan Serini, CEO, Fruit Cybersecurity ([22:56]–[26:34])

• Anthropic & OpenAI Incidents

  • Anthropic disclosed three cases where its Claude AI agent ‘accidentally’ hacked real companies during ‘closed’ testing.
  • OpenAI’s recent test saw an “escaped” agent hack Hugging Face and another firm.

• Industry & Regulatory Responses

  • Both incidents highlight risks as sandbox environments fail.
  • Anthropic conducted mass retrospective reviews—141,000 evaluations—urged other AI companies to do the same.
  • Growing push in Washington for an AI “kill switch”; Sam Altman lobbying lawmakers this week.

• Cybersecurity Perspective

  • Ivan Serini praises transparency but warns: “What can this mean in the near future? What if there is an exponential growth of those kind of rogue agents or rogue AI attacks?” ([23:28])
  • Emphasizes: Rules empower legitimate players, not adversaries. “Attackers and criminals...do not abide by those rules. So whatever rules are put forward, they should empower defenders...” ([24:46])
  • Practical advice: Continuously test for vulnerabilities using AI agents; stay a step ahead ([26:01]).

---

4. FIFA Faces Backlash Over Private Equity Sale Plan

Guest: Alex Sherman, CNBC Media Sports Reporter

Timestamps: [28:42]–[32:42]

• Deal Details & Criticism

  • FIFA’s proposal: Sell 20% of commercial World Cup subsidiary to private equity.
  • Rejected by UEFA (Europe) and CONCACAF (North America); concerns over lack of member consultation and the “ickiness” of private equity in sports.
  • Cultural and governance criticisms: Europeans cite sport’s ‘sanctity’; echoes of existing resistance in US college sports and NFL.

• Sherman’s Take

  • “There appears to be a limit [to private equity in sports]...participants are just not all that comfortable with outside investors taking a stake in it.” ([29:01])

---

5. Legal Battle over Prediction Markets: Kalshi vs. New York State

Segment: Contessa Brewer (CNBC Correspondent)

Timestamps: [39:35]–[42:43]

• Lawsuit Overview

  • NY Attorney General sues prediction market Kalshi, deems it illegal gambling; seeks to claw back as much as $36B.
  • Kalshi: Calls it “political theater,” moves case to federal court, appeals decision against preemption of state laws.
  • Legal split: “At federal level where Kalshi is winning some victories. At the state level, it keeps losing.” ([41:41])
  • Outcome likely to be decided by Supreme Court due to jurisdictional conflict.

• Broader Implications

  • Echoes regulatory fights of Uber/Airbnb: Consumer sentiment and regulatory clarity to ultimately shape the industry.

---

6. Hyperscaler Race: Who Survives Tech’s Spending Boom?

Guest: Matt Maley, Chief Market Strategist, Miller Tabak

Timestamps: [44:02]–[47:07]

• Winning and Losing Hyperscalers

  • Not all major platforms can emerge as winners; expects one or two, rather than four or more, to dominate in the end.
  • Bullish picks: Google & Amazon—“these are the ones that...have the whole package to kind of pull things together and ride out any kind of battle that takes place.” ([44:50])
  • Mixed on Microsoft (“doesn’t have [custom AI chips] like Google’s TPUs”) and cautious on Oracle (concerns over contracts, debt, and monetization).

• Takeaway

  • “The amazing amount of spending...and when [a company is] admitting that they may have a tough time monetizing this...that does bring the situation into question.” ([46:22])

---

Featured Quotes

• “This is really the market saying that 30% of all future US corporate profits are going to be tech hardware makers.”
  — Steven Whiting ([02:00])

• “If the BOJ took its foot off the gas...the JGB 30 year yield would be in the double digits, say 10 or 12% and then Japan would have a fiscal crisis.”
  — Robin Brooks ([36:09])

• “The connective tissue between [price stability] and not raising rates is completely missing...the Fed is the most important player in the game.”
  — Greg Ip ([11:38])

• “Attackers and criminals...do not abide by [rules]. So whatever rules are put forward, they should empower defenders and not limit ability for us to defend ourselves.”
  — Ivan Serini ([24:46])

---

Notable Moments & Timestamps

• [02:23] Market's tech allocation compared to 2000 bubble
• [05:12] Software stocks’ steep underperformance vs. earnings
• [08:27] Steve Liesman explains Fed dissenter arguments
• [11:38] Greg Ip critiques Fed’s lack of clear communication
• [14:34] Barve and Ip debate fiscal’s role in yields
• [20:00] Anthropic’s admission of AI model breaches
• [23:28] Ivan Serini on the precedent set by AI “breakouts”
• [28:42] Sherman on FIFA’s private equity controversy
• [39:35] Contessa Brewer breaks down Kalshi’s legal plight
• [44:50] Maley: Amazon and Google as top hyperscaler contenders

---

The Exchange’s Tone & Style

• Fast-paced, sharp, CNBC newsroom confidence.
• Mix of serious financial analysis, real-world risks (AI, regulation), and wry observation (“tempest in a teapot,” “the sanctity of the game”).
• Focuses on actionable investor insight as well as policy and regulatory implications.

---

Conclusion

This episode unpacks the day’s seismic business stories through in-depth analysis with top market strategists, economists, and industry insiders. From the cyclical swings in tech spending, Fed policymaker messaging, and AI regulatory urgency, to power struggles in sports business and prediction markets, The Exchange delivers a comprehensive briefing for financially-savvy listeners tracking market movers and regulatory currents.

---

For further detail, refer to the episode’s full show notes or segments on CNBC.com.

Transcript

[Announcer]

Trading at Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade. Unlocking the power of thinkorswim. The award winning trading platforms loaded with features that let you dive deeper into the market. Visualize your trades in a new light on thinkorswim desktop with robust charting and analysis tools all while you uncover new opportunities with up to the minute market news and insights. ThinkOrSwim is available on desktop, web and mobile to meet you where you are. It's built by the trading obsessed to help you trade brilliantly. Learn [e-mail] trading hey, real quick.

[Kelly Evans]

Since you didn't pay to skip ads,

[Ad-Lib Voice / Monday.com Advertiser]

we're going to assume that you like to save money.

[Kelly Evans]

And for the sake of this ad,

[Robin Brooks]

we're also going to assume that you

[Kelly Evans]

have a cat or a dog.

[Ad-Lib Voice / Monday.com Advertiser]

Okay? Lemonade pet insurance can save you up to 90% on vet bills.

[Kelly Evans]

You definitely know that vet bills can

[Robin Brooks]

pile up fast, which is why Lemonade

[Ad-Lib Voice / Monday.com Advertiser]

settles half of all claims instantly super fast. And we definitely know that you just

[Kelly Evans]

want to get back to whatever it

[Ad-Lib Voice / Monday.com Advertiser]

is you were just listening to.

[Kelly Evans]

Which is why we'll also settle this ad like now get a [e-mail] pet. Thank you very much, Mike. The broader averages are pretty resilient today as Amazon soars, Apple falls and shadow yields seem to be bursting to the fore. I'm Kelly Evans and welcome to the Exchange. Don't look now but treasury yields are jumping today. The 10 year above 4.7% and the long bond eyeing 5.3. It feels like the new Fed chair is winging it, or so says the Wall Street Journal's Greg Gibb. He joins us in just a mom. Plus the implosion of the mag 7 at least as a trading moniker. Today it's Amazon soaring while Apple sinks after their earnings last night. Matt Malley weighs in on the trade and the air race. And look at these moves for chips and software this week. Sanders swinging from a multi month low to a historic high. And that's where we begin today because here is where our first guest is seeing the biggest opportunity. Steven Whiting is chief Investment strategist at CIO Group. It's great to have you here.

[Steven Whiting]

Thank you, Stephen.

[Kelly Evans]

So where is it? Is it the software part of the market? I mean, should we back out for a second and kind of just, just what is the lay of the land?

[Steven Whiting]

Now big picture, this is a little bit of hardware mania. If you think semiconductors tech hardware at about 30% of the S and P market cap, what that's really telling You a close approximation is that this is really the market saying that 30% of all future US corporate profits are going to be tech hardware makers and that

[Kelly Evans]

may that be true.

[Steven Whiting]

No, the last time we did that was like right at the peak of 2000. Now I do think that we have a near term opportunity here in semiconductors for the companies that are really the innovators, not necessarily the commodity makers.

[Kelly Evans]

Okay.

[Steven Whiting]

You know you're looking at all of these hyperscaler CAPEX numbers come in up 85% growth this year. Amazon again. So one of them, Apple was -15 by the way on its CapEx plan. But the important thing is that next year is firming up. Those estimates are going up for their spending to finish their projects. 26% growth and that just going to mean that this will be a period of incredibly heightened profits. But then you take a look at the disconnect with software being treated like we're not going to use it anymore.

[Kelly Evans]

Right. But before we get into software. So what you're saying is you've been expecting bigger CAPEX plans.

[Steven Whiting]

Right?

[Kelly Evans]

Look, we talk to a lot of people who are waiting for the street. As high as these numbers are to really go up as high as. So you're in that camp, you're taking over?

[Steven Whiting]

I think so, yes. So at CIO Group we've done some cuts to semis at the end of May. On the US side we've added back at the beginning of the month on international we've cut some because this is really again the commodity related trade. If you think about DRAM producers having a massive leap in profits on a high and other things that again doesn't mean long term growth. And the fact is is that they're highly cyclical and we just saw those stocks levitate, get everything in video had in its entire run up. So that's going to be still I think a more troubled part of the semiconductor trade. And even if the spending pushes it up in the near term, it's going to be more vulnerable I think in

[Kelly Evans]

the bullish on, on the capex coming from the biggest players. Correct. But cautious on the receivers of that capital. You think this is behaving sort of showing its usual cyclical behavior with prices in a proportion of the S and R of the market. That is basically at what? We've only been eclipsed by it at the market.

[Steven Whiting]

Exactly. It just, it's truly fundamental. No one should complain again that the DRAM makers have you know, pushed up their profits tenfold. That's a good reason for stocks to rise. The problem is is that this type of an a buildout in capex which in three year compounded growth rate is going to be about 65%. This whole thing, if we were to extend this three years ahead, it'd be bigger than the whole economy.

[Kelly Evans]

Exactly.

[Steven Whiting]

It's just not going to be that big in the future because again the people that are spending the money, the Amazons and the Googles are not just in the business to give all of their profits away.

[Kelly Evans]

That being said so again kind of just painting that bullish on, on the Capex happening for now a little bit cautious on the receivers that trade doing. So we're where does that bring you to the software position which, which I think is where you're saying there is huge opportunity.

[Steven Whiting]

Again you look at other things we like if you looked at health care, if you look at energy, these are things where earnings are going up and so are share prices and if you take a look at software, if a 20% negative return over the last 12 months, you can't reconcile that when profits are up 15 now again 15 is not 115 like semiconductors but but the fact is is that many of these companies just examples of Microsoft again or companies that are going to be around and are actually growing their profits. Hey, and the share prices say we're not part of the future.

[Kelly Evans]

Microsoft was so incredible, I mean up 17% in a day yesterday. Yes, it had been sitting in the penalty box for a long time but now it's, it's out. You would then be an owner of that one and owner of software names broadly or do you have to be hyper specific?

[Steven Whiting]

Look, it would be very clear that some of the services, that some of this stuff will end up being taken out by AI providers that are not public companies. And you can remember what the iPhone did to you know, photography. This is going to be the case again for some of what is done and companies that are not public like Anthropic are going to be there that are harm that industry. But broadly when you've traded off this much, when you've said that it's all hardware, no software, it's a macro trade that we want to pursue.

[Kelly Evans]

It's almost like what you're saying is, you know there's a difference between the narrative and the stock price.

[Steven Whiting]

Correct.

[Kelly Evans]

And so in your point of view the narrative is great for receivers of AI capital but the stock prices are, are at cyclical high, I mean are more or less at highs. And with software the narrative is troubled and you Acknowledge they are going to face trouble.

[Steven Whiting]

But the price, show me their falling profits and then, you know, then you can get pessimistic.

[Kate Rooney]

Right, right.

[Kelly Evans]

And then finally, just to put a point on this, that's in the tech, specifically part of the market, which is probably the biggest, most important thing to figure out.

[Ad-Lib Voice / Monday.com Advertiser]

Right.

[Kelly Evans]

But do you feel constructive broadly? We haven't talked a lot about midterms and all these other risks, all these other sectors, financials, the yield curve. I mean there's a lot of else to.

[Steven Whiting]

So there's all sorts of things.

[Kelly Evans]

Look at bond yields today. I mean that's the market's shrugging it off.

[Steven Whiting]

Well, look, I mean, you know, Chairman Warsh seems to be saying that the Fed is a credibility problem. And that's sort of the problem is that he's saying that. Right. The market wasn't complaining about that. And then all nine governors in Washington voted to leave rates unchanged. So, you know, it's like he's pointing to this credibility problem that the market didn't really have. So what we've done is again assume that we can have some rise in the dollar here where again people were quite bearish coming into this. We've seen some of the strength in the trial trade that's more vulnerable again, like Korean memory stocks as sort of a place where we want to be a little bit more cautious and then put more money to work in US Stocks generally where if we take out energy, we take out semiconductors. We've got a growth rate here that's probably about 15% EPS growth.

[Kelly Evans]

I'll take it. Yes, pretty good. Very great times in fact. Steve.

[Steven Whiting]

Complicated.

[Kelly Evans]

Yes, complicated as well. Steve Whiting, really appreciate it. Joining us from CEO Group. Speaking of war, we're finally hearing from those three dissenters on Wednesday who each voted for a quarter point hike, but we didn't get one. Our senior economics reporter Steve Liesman is here with those details. Steve, what do they say?

[Steve Liesman]

The center is issuing statements on the Friday after the meeting. Kelly, that's the custom. And the three voters, they all wanted a quarter point increase. They struck some familiar themes that lay out the hawkish case for a hike. Now among those points, small hikes now they say will avoid big hikes later. Inflation will not take care of itself. Part of the debate about the persistence of inflation, even if they are caused by supply shocks, inflation is too high for too long. Specific comments. Lori Logan, the Dallas Fed president writing, quote, without any policy restraint, inflation will likely continue to trend above target. Add to that Beth Hammock From Cleveland, she offered businesses describe pricing pressures as broadening rather than fading and consumers are expressing despair or persistently higher prices. Now to be sure, nine officials voted for a pause and that's where the majority is. They haven't spoken yet. Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh even rejected calling the Fed's action this week a pause.

[Greg Ip]

Did the Fed take an explicit change in its policy rate today? No, but I think that's the beginning of the story, not the end of the story.

[Steve Liesman]

So that could mean warches closer to the hawks than most believe. From his press conference and is waiting for maybe just more data to see which way inflation trends and whether the Fed needs to respond with a hike. And Kelly, I would just offer that the 30 year was one thing that's a less liquid market, but the move in the 10 year today May be more of a wake up call for the Fed.

[Robin Brooks]

Right.

[Kelly Evans]

It was up 7 or 8 basis before 73 or so at last check. Steve, thanks very much. Steve Liesman, one of our next guests says Wednesday's decision was so dovish it was hawkish. And the other says it's starting to feel like Marsh is winging it. Let's bring in Adiyabarve, who is head of U.S. economics at bank of America and Wall Street Journal's chief economics commentator. Greg, welcome to you both. Aditya. We talked to Mike Froli at JP Morgan yesterday who after the lack of clarity in the press conference said he thinks the market's going to force the Fed's hand. He moved up his rate hike to December from the middle of next year. Have you guys done anything similar like that?

[Aditya Barve]

Good afternoon, Kelly. We already have a pretty hawkish call. We had the Fed hiking September, October and December of this year prior to the Fed meeting. So we think that's we're very happy to stay there for now. I kind of agree with the idea that the market could force the Fed's hand, the data could force the Fed's hand. The market question though is really interesting. Right. Walsh was very, very dovish. Bunch of comments he made kind of got the markets thinking, okay, are we muddying the waters around inflation credibility and that's what led to the move in the long end. Right. And we know that the other 18, we don't know what Walsh thinks. He doesn't like to tell us. But we know that the put a lot of weight on inflation expectations, on credibility. If they start to see risks, that expectations are getting unanchored, then I think the bar for them to hike in terms of the next two months of jobs data and inflation data comes down meaningfully.

[Kelly Evans]

Greg, I was struck by what Steve Whiting just said when he, he said Wash is out there talking about a credibility problem that the Fed didn't really have. In other words, is he creating one?

[Greg Ip]

Well, that's certainly what the markets seem to think. I mean, look, Kelly, the thing that puzzles me about this whole week is that there was a very strong economically grounded case not to raise interest rates this week. But Wash didn't make that case. I mean, he talked about we are actually going to deliver price stability, but we're not going to raise rates. And the connective tissue between these two sentences is completely missing. And so I think part of this is that he does sincerely want to pull back the communication, call back, pull back the guidance, let markets provide as unfiltered a view as they want. But I feel like he's being unrealistic, if not naive about just how much he can pull that back. There isn't some world where the Fed is some, you know, neutral umpire calling balls and strikes. It's a, the most important player in the game and a fiat money system like ours, somebody has to set the risk free rate. That's the Fed. The markets need to understand what is driving those decisions. And if the Fed doesn't provide that reasoning, they will look to other explanations. And unfortunately, going back to the credibility question, there are doubts in the market about whether he sincerely means about inflation. And that's what you've seen priced into the bond market since the Fed meeting.

[Kelly Evans]

Greg, yesterday we were having a big debate about this on Power Lunch and Rick Santelli's point of view is that Bush is intentionally trying to step back, point the finger back at the fiscal, in other words, the underlying drivers of these long term pressures on the long end. And do you think that that's something that's coming to the surface here? Is he trying in a way to take the Fed out of a picture in order to show that, yeah, like that problem needs to be addressed or dealt with by, by the fiscal side.

[Greg Ip]

I don't know if that's what he's doing, but it would be absurd and completely at odds with everything he's been saying during his testimony. During his confirmation hearing, he said repeatedly the Fed should stay in its lane. That means it has no business commenting on fiscal policy, much less setting monetary policy based on fiscal policy. The Fed should be taking fiscal policy as a given and then dealing with it as to. In any case, when you hear the first part of his press conference and the first thing out of his mouth is oh, is it interesting that long term bond yields went up. They saw that data and they priced that in. There is no data about the fiscal deficit in the last six to eight weeks. There was no new news on that front. So no, I disagree with Rick on that. Let me rephrase that. I don't know if Rick is right but all I'm saying is very hard to actually tell a coherent story why fiscal policy should be have anything to do with what was doing or saying

[Kelly Evans]

because the deal will also talk in a little bit with, with Robin Brooks. Go ahead. But there's other, I mean look at what's happening with Japan and long term rates globally. So should we even be tying today's move in the 10 year to wash or is that a reflection of what's going on in Japan and elsewhere?

[Aditya Barve]

So I think it's tricky to make the connection day to day but we clearly know what happened between 2:30pm and 4:00pm on Wednesday and WARSH is the most obvious explanation for what happened there. And then just going back to the question on fiscal it would be one thing if the Fed were actively doing QE and then thinking of pulling back right. To let fiscal policy sort itself out and be reflected in in bond yields. But I don't think the solution to fiscal policy being a bit too lose is to add risk premium into the long end or increase long end break even inflation expectations.

[Kelly Evans]

Although unless you wanted them to deal with the problem, in other words to say no there should we the Fed don't want to be in the business of suppressing that.

[Aditya Barve]

Right. But they're not suppressing it by, you know, they're not doing QE right now. The way in which you would suppress it potentially is if you are doing aggressive qe. The way in which you bring the problem to the fore is not by creating uncertainty about whether you're willing to hit your inflation target. Right. As Greg said, the appropriate response for the Fed is to take fiscal policy as a given. You don't comment on it, you just respond to it.

[Kelly Evans]

So there's the five year break even.

[Aditya Barve]

That would again mean tighter policy.

[Kelly Evans]

Yeah, 225. We've, we're actually down on the day on the five year break even. So if, if he were causing inflation expectations to become unanchored, the chart on your screens there would be rising back towards the highs from March, April, May and when they were above two and a half percent and I think his shot dropped. But Greg, do you want to respond

[Greg Ip]

to that, yeah, look flat out, let me just say inflation expectations are not unanchored right now. I don't see anything in the markets suggests that the Fed had lost a plot, that there's a serious credibility problem. But at the margin, Aditu was right. If you look at the way the market behaved between 230 and 4 and continuing into yesterday and today, it's not what any Fed. You've seen short term rate yields come down on expectations of an easier Fed policy and long term rates and some break evens go up on expectations that there will be a little bit more headwinds on inflation. No Fed chairman could be happy with that kind of response to what they did. Now it's early days, Kelly. It's only been a couple of days. You know, it's entirely possible that either Warsh or his colleagues incoming will come out and clarify and perhaps tell us more than they said. I also think my own view is that they're going to get bailed out by the data. I happen to think that there's a very good chance we have turned the corner on inflation and another rate increase will not be necessary. In which case a lot of the stuff that we're sort of like worrying about right now won't seem so important

[Kelly Evans]

and yields will fall.

[Greg Ip]

Yes.

[Kelly Evans]

All right then. It's a tempest in a teapot. I don't know. Greg, thank you. Really appreciate it today. Greg from the Wall Street Journal. And this discussion will be continued with Robin with Rick later. We'll continue to get everyone's thoughts. Coming up, anthropic revealing three instances now where its AI models have hacked separate organizations. After OpenAI's hugging face hack, is it time for a kill switch that lawmakers have been lobbying for? We'll ask a CyberSecurity expert for next. Plus, Japan reportedly intervening to strengthen its currency against the dollar. Now Reuters reports the US treasury has informed banks it may intervene in Japan's yen. That's the first such intervention we'd have in 15 years. Our guest says the key to stabilizing Japan's currency is in their interest rates. We'll talk to Robin Brooks. With the yen at a two month high against the greenback, the exchange is back after this. This is the exchange on CNBC Foreign.

[Announcer]

Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade. Unlocking the power of thinkorswim, the award winning trading platforms loaded with features that let you dive deeper into the market. Visualize your trades in a new light on thinkorswim desktop with robust charting and analysis tools. All while you uncover new opportunities with up to the minute market news and insights. ThinkOrSwim is available on desktop, web and mobile to meet you where you are. It's built by the trading obsessed to help you trade brilliantly. Learn [e-mail] trading when you partner with

[Kelly Evans]

CDW, you get more from your devices with solutions purpose built for your toughest tasks. CDW experts are creating seamless workplaces using HP's suite of PCs, printers and peripherals so remote teams can work flexibly and designers can display their brilliance, all while keeping your customer data safe. Make amazing happen. Learn [e-mail] HP

[Ad-Lib Voice / Monday.com Advertiser]

Monday AI agents took over my work and I absolutely love it. Chasing deadlines, writing status reports, updating stakeholders. Agents handle the daily grind. Now they live inside Monday.com, so they see the full picture. My work, my team, the whole company. And I don't have to worry about the data. It's safe, which means I'm free to focus on the big stuff. Knowing everything runs smoothly in the background. It's completely shifted the way we work. Create your own AI agent in minutes on Monday.com welcome back.

[Kelly Evans]

It's been less than 10 days since OpenAI disclosed its AI models broke out of their testing environments to hack Hugging face Now Anthropic is revealing three separate instances where its models breached other organizations. Kate Rooney has more in today's Tech check. Kate, what do we know?

[Kate Rooney]

Yeah, Kelly. Well, this is certainly the latest cybersecurity issue in AI. Anthropic now says it found those three cases where its agent Claude accidentally hacked real companies during what was supposed to be cybersecurity testing. Anthropic didn't say which companies, but it did say that its AI model was meant to be in this closed test environment, attacking what they thought were simulated targets, not real companies. Anthropic says the incidents were a result of a testing environment failure. Researchers basically left a door open. They claim it wasn't AI going rogue or breaking out. They also said they started this retrospective review after OpenAI's incident last week. They ran 141,000 evaluations as part of this encouraged other companies to go out and do the same thing and check on their own AI systems. It was all kicked off by OpenAI in a separate and in some ways similar issue. One of the OpenAI's agents escaped was also a contained environment. It was being tested and in order to find the answers to that evaluation, it did hack another startup Hugging face in the process. We found out recently it did Also breach another company. OpenAI at the time called that unprecedented. It is sort of starting to set a precedent though it underlines the cybersecurity risk here as these capabilities get much better in AI, these testing environments and sandboxes can clear clearly create real world risk. And it is a challenge for Washington. Sam Altman was there this week meeting with policymakers. It is fueling this debate, Kelly, about how to regulate AI, including proposals out there out of Congress in particular for a possible AI kill switch.

[Kelly Evans]

Kelly, did they say which companies got hacked?

[Kate Rooney]

No. Three companies.

[Kelly Evans]

I can see why might be a little bit.

[Kate Rooney]

They said, I think they're working behind the scenes and they've notified the companies. So we may find out in the next couple of days. This happened with the hugging face issue. We have slowly got some information in those cases.

[Kelly Evans]

I think it was hugging face and the other company, which now escapes me, that had said we discovered that we were being hacked and figured it out. Hugging face is kind of like GitHub for AI, so they probably have the tools. Other companies, not so much, but yet they were the ones who realized there had been an incursion.

[Kate Rooney]

It seemed like Anthropic Kelly was getting ahead of this by doing this, this analysis and trying to say, okay, well we should probably go check on our own systems. They run similar AI models to open AI. But you're very right in that OpenAI's was reactive. Another company flagged it and said, wait a minute, we've got a rogue agent here hacking our systems. Anthropic has said, hey, as a result of that, we did our homework, we went and retroactively looked at this and as a result we did find these holes. But it begs the question of if, if this hadn't been brought to the attention of these companies, which we don't know who they are, but it might not be a tech company. They said organizations too. So it could be a nonprofit, you never know, right? Or university. So it does beg the question of putting capabilities, cyber capabilities in the hands of average companies. This is. The risk is so broad here.

[Kelly Evans]

No, you don't want it to be a bank, you know, and panic everybody. Kate, thank you very much. Kate Rooney, as she said, does there need to be some kind of kill switch or emergency brake built into these AI models into their testing environment? Let's ask a cyber expert. Ivan see for. For. You know, Ivan, I did this three times earlier. Fruit CEO Ivan Serini, it's wonderful to see you again. First of all, I haven't been able to get your point of view on these breakouts yet, what do you make of them? I mean, and how do we deal with it?

[Ivan Serini]

Yeah, it's. Well, one of the ways to look at it is is it a big issue in the future? Definitely. But it's actually really a precedent. So when you look at it as a precedent, and by the way, big kudos and shout out to both OpenAI and Anthropic for disclosing that. Because now imagine there are many other non American AI labs that may not be disclosing those kind of breakouts. And now looking at as a precedent, what can this mean in the near future? What if there is an exponential growth of those kind of rogue agents or rogue AI attacks? That is really what we are concerned about.

[Kelly Evans]

So we spoke to Bob Greifeld, the former NASDAQ CEO the other day. He had, he has a good point of view on this. Having sat in that seat, understands regulation, sees a model that we could use here for AI. But he was focusing then and I think people increasingly focus now, not necessarily on overall overly broad regulation. Ivan. But how do we regulate the sandbox environment where these companies are testing their models? Because as we know, there's a ton of companies testing these models all the time. So they can say the benchmarks were so and so. That is an area now where there obviously needs to be pretty clear standardization and rules and. But you know, don't you think.

[Ivan Serini]

Yeah, it's definitely. Rules are usually very, very helpful. They streamline and they help find, you know, issues where they do arise and when they do arise. However, there's also a really important caveat. There is that who obeys the rules, it's the legitimate companies, not the attackers. So one really important concern to keep in mind in regulatory motion is that attackers and criminals in adversarial states do not abide by those rules. So whatever rules are put forward, they should empower defenders and not limit ability for us to defend ourselves against Rob AI 100%.

[Kelly Evans]

Solving this problem is not to say, well, open AI and they did follow the rules. I mean they thought this was offline. It found a way to get itself online to complete the goal. So I, you know, you can hardly blame them too much, I guess in Anthropic's case, was it connected to the Internet? I don't know. Obviously again, there needs to be more safeguards around that. But the models just demonstrate their own potency through these kinds of headlines. So as a final comment, what would you say about shoring up defenses across any organization attached to the Internet at this point.

[Ivan Serini]

Yeah, definitely all and we do it on a day to day basis actually we use AI agents to simulate attacks to find where could there be weaknesses that other AI models could exploit. So really basic rules are making sure that all of the weaknesses, all the backdoors, even known or unknown issues are taken care of and are plugged and secured and then defenders who are using AI to predict what other AI models or tools can find and explode is really strong so as to in order to stay at least one or two steps ahead of attackers.

[Kelly Evans]

All right Ivan for now that we'll talk tick tock again another time. So the cyberspace never quiet Fruit CEO Ivan Serini thanks very much. Coming up, FIFA facing backlash over its private equity investment plan. The European soccer governing body slamming it as irresponsible and indefensible. An inside look at the proposal and its critics next.

[Announcer]

Trading at Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade. Unlocking the power of thinkorswim, the award winning trading platforms loaded with features that let you dive deeper into the market. Visualize your trades in a new light on thinkorswim desktop with robust charting and analysis tools all while you uncover new opportunities with up to the minute market news and insights. ThinkOrSwim is available on desktop, web and mobile to meet you where you are. It's built by the trading obsessed to help you trade brilliantly. Learn [e-mail] trading the colonels cooked up

[Greg Ip]

a new ten dollar bucket of the

[Kelly Evans]

day just for you.

[Greg Ip]

Monday 24 nuggets for ten dollars Tuesday 8 piece fried chicken for dollar ten Wednesday 10 wings for ten dollars Thursday 8 tenders for dollar ten Friday 24 nuggets for.

[Alex Sherman]

Oh you guessed.

[Greg Ip]

Ten dollars. Finger licking machine the ten dollars bucket

[Kelly Evans]

of the day deal every weekday only at KFC it's finger licking. Good prices and participation.

[Ad-Lib Voice / Monday.com Advertiser]

Variable supplies last not available on third party ordering platforms.

[Robin Brooks]

Tax extra.

[Ad-Lib Voice / Monday.com Advertiser]

Monday AI agents took over my work

[Kelly Evans]

and I absolutely love it.

[Ad-Lib Voice / Monday.com Advertiser]

Chasing deadlines, writing status reports, updating stakeholders. Agents handle the daily grind. Now they live inside Monday.com so they see the full picture. My work, my team, the whole company. And I don't have to worry about the data. It's safe. Which means I'm free to focus on the big stuff. Knowing everything runs smoothly in the background. It's completely shifted the way we work. Create your own AI agent in minutes. On Monday.com.

[Kelly Evans]

FIFA is facing backlash on a global scale over its proposal to sell a multibillion dollar stake in its commercial business to private investors. CNBC's Media Sports reporter Alex Sherman is here on set with me and. All right, let's hear it. Whatever. Everyone's mad or is it just the Europeans? But I guess they're the most important ones in some sport.

[Alex Sherman]

I don't know that any member of global soccer is all that thrilled with this, perhaps with the exception of FIFA and it's want to be partners in this. But we've heard now from UEFA, who represents all the European countries, concacaf, which represents the North American soccer companies, they've also rejected this plan. That's about half of all of FIFA's members right there, a little less. But unless those member countries are convinced that it more or less, I would say dooms this from happening, which is the idea is to say, sell a 20% stake in a subsidiary, a commercial subsidiary that would run the business operations of the World Cup. And there's. There's two reasons why there's been this pushback. The first one is process related, which is just that these member countries are just finding out about this now. They have not been a part of the process of this. And so there's all sorts of questions about the governance of it and why this deal, why now, why this amount of money? And then the second question speaks to more of what I think we'll talk about in this, which is the ickiness factor of private equity in certain sports. Now, we've seen it in professional sports quite a bit in terms of minority stakes, but there does appear to be a limit, whether that's college or now sort of this idea of selling the World cup where the participants are just not all that comfortable with outside investors taking a stake in it.

[Kelly Evans]

Are there analogies for what they're trying to do here? Are there existing structures like this or would this be novel?

[Alex Sherman]

Well, I think the analogy is what has been thought about but has not happened in college sports, which is the idea of in essence securitizing existing teams like, you know, Michigan football or the Kansas basketball, and selling a 20% stake to private equity. Where the money comes in. There is sort of a purity to sports that I think a lot of private equity investors have seen as the ultimate barrier to a lot of these transactions where they feel like it makes sense, particularly at the college level now, where they need to pay the players and they need money.

[Kelly Evans]

What, what about the NFL where they've obviously opened up ownership of, is it particular teams to private equity. But this would be more like what, selling the super bowl to private equity?

[Alex Sherman]

Well, right. Or almost selling the NFL to private equity, the league itself. But one of the other, you know, you could make an argument it's the super bowl is the better example there because it is just the World cup, But it's obviously FIFA's signature event here. Yeah, I think there's again, you start to get cultural reasons in here, too, which is why if you take a look at the UEFA statement, it is really strong. It is like there is no place for, for outside investment in football. You know, this is the, the sanctity of the game is that is at place. And again, I think there is part of that is sort of a cultural European backlash to FIFA, which has had its corruption scandals through the years, to the current relationship between the FIFA president and President Trump, which I think perhaps stems from the decision to overturn the Baligan red card. And sort of the, you know, the thinking about why did that exactly happen? And you're bending the rules. There's just a general uncomfortableness, I think, with all of what's going on.

[Kelly Evans]

I know you have more in your full piece if you want to go read it cnbc.com sport Again, let this be a reminder. If you're going to do something like this, maybe just check first. Maybe just, just behind the scenes, you know, you feel like that might have at least either told them if you're going to do this, be prepared for this kind of backlash or given a chance to make the pitch to, to those parties.

[Alex Sherman]

Absolutely. I think we would have seen a different tone in the rejection had that happen.

[Kelly Evans]

Right. Exactly. For now, Alex, thanks. To be continued. Alex sherman, over to Sima Modi now for the CNBC news update.

[Seema Modi]

Seema Kelly, here's what we're watching at this hour. A top Trump administration adviser on Venezuela telling Reuters he is stepping down from the role Mauricio Claver coron helped shape U.S. venezuelan policy and multimillion dollar deals for the country's vast oil resources. He says his departure was voluntary, but Reuters reports he was forced out. A movie for producer is suing Netflix for $105 million after he says a copy of his unreleased film starring Nicolas Cage was stolen from the streaming giant studios. The lawsuit says producer Simon Afram invested more than $45 million into the production and that its value has been destroyed as it could appear on piracy sites. Netflix says it's not responsible but is investigating. And a new plan released today by the Trump administration could drastically, drastically cut the water supplied by the Colorado river to Arizona, Nevada and California. The seven states that use the water have been fighting over how to divide the dwindling water supply when the current rules expire at the end of this year. The plan does not force mandatory cuts on Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico, which also depend on the river. Kelly, back to you.

[Kelly Evans]

Contentious area. Seema, thanks very much. Sima Modi. Coming up, our next guest is Wall Street's acting like a jilted lover following the Fed. And the panic about inflation is dead wrong. He makes his case as we see yields spike across the curve. The 30 year reaching a near two decade high this week.

[Contessa Brewer]

Right.

[Kelly Evans]

474 on the 10 year. We have more after this. Welcome back. See this chart here? The Japanese yen on pace for its best week since February after coming off a 40 year low against the dollar. Now this is after the Japanese government intervened overnight and amid reports that the US treasury is also ready to jump in if necessary. But according to my next guest, each round of invention is to some extent proving less effective than the last. Joining us now is Robin Brooks, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. Robin, there's so many places we could start, but this is maybe a good one. How important are the events in Japan as to understanding why bond yields are on the rise globally today?

[Robin Brooks]

Hey Kelly, it's great to be with you. So I can remember being on Wall street and dollar yen was 75. So 75 yen to $1. Here we are at 160. The weakness in the yen is just staggering. I remember having a forecast when the yen was 75 to the dollar of 125. I would go into hedge fund meetings in New York City and people would say you're nuts. So the kind of weakness that we've seen is unprecedented. Kelly, the natural reaction that people have when they see this kind of weakness is to think about monetary policy, right? We think about currencies as basically about arbitraging different central bank positions, right?

[Kelly Evans]

It's like, oh, they raised or they lowered. But your point is their government, their central bank has so much purchases of its debt, you can't move Japanese interest rates. So you have to attack the currency. And you see this, I mean this could just keep getting worse and worse and worse. And then if you think if they lifted their foot off and just let the market go where it would that the 10 year could be in the double digits. Is that the 10 or the 30s or both that you think would have double digit yields?

[Alex Sherman]

Both.

[Robin Brooks]

So you summarize my view perfectly better than I could. So Japan has gross debt of 240% of GDP. That's massive because of that the bank of Japan is continuously buying debt on the secondary market and that caps interest rates. Now the 30 year yield in Japan is 4%. If the BOJ took its foot off the gas, if it stopped intervening, I have no doubt that the JGB 30 year yield would be in the double digits, say 10 or 12%, and then Japan would have a fiscal crisis. So rather than having a fiscal crisis, they are basically allowing the yen to weaken because why would you hold Japanese assets if you don't get paid for

[Kelly Evans]

that at some point? They can't defend the yen forever. I mean, that has an expense too. And so this feels like, I don't hate to say, a ticking time bomb. Maybe it's going to be fine. I mean, we've largely averted disaster that has been foretold again and again over the past 30 years. And of course I'm interested in what this means for the U.S. we're in a big fight this week over why our long term yields are rising. Is it Warsh's fault? Is it because we're heading down the Japan route? I mean, what should we do now so we don't end up in this kind of situation?

[Robin Brooks]

So, you know, there's a lot of finger pointing at the Fed this week about how it's losing credibility, yada, yada, yada. I'm not a big fan of that. I think the Fed has gone way too far down the rabbit hole of providing forward guidance. And in a way all this forward guidance is kind of going in the direction of what Japan is doing. Right. It's manipulating and artificially setting at a certain level long term yields. And Kevin Warsh, I think rightly is saying, hey, we're going to take a step back now. That means that bond markets have to do more work, they're going to get more wrong. And it means that there's more finger pointing at the Fed, which is, I think, where all these criticisms that the Fed is losing credibility are coming from. So I think you want to fade that. Yeah, I think markets are still misreading the Fed and I think they still have to take off their training wheels.

[Kelly Evans]

And you, you'd rather us be at 475 today to avoid being at 10% tomorrow. But that means inevitably we need some kind of deficit and debt adjustment.

[Robin Brooks]

Yeah, I mean, the necessary condition at the end of the day, Kelly, for fiscal policy to become better, and I think we all agree that there's some room for improvement in the United States and many other places is for yields to be able to go up. And for them to be able to scare policymakers, it's the only way. It's a necessary condition. And so that fundamentally is a good thing, not a bad thing. And I think US Policy has a lot of room to improve.

[Kelly Evans]

All right, well, everyone shares that. Then we're scared what improve actually means. So we'll see, see how that plays out in the midterms and beyond. Robin, thanks talking us through.

[Robin Brooks]

Great to be with you. Have a great weekend.

[Kelly Evans]

To Robin Brooks with Brookings. Coming up, a new suit in the ongoing legal battle between Kelsey and the state of New York. We'll bring you those billion dollar details next. Welcome back to the Exchange. New York City state is suing prediction markets platform Kelsey calling it an illegal gambling operation. And in some ways, I'm not surprised we've gotten to this point. But Contessa Brewer is here. She's got all the gory details.

[Contessa Brewer]

Okay, so Kalshee is calling this political theater, says the state just can't shut down a federally regulated exchange. But New York sure is trying. It wants to keep Calci permanently from offering contracts on sports, elections and even cultural events. State Attorney General Letitia James is seeking to recover the company's gains. And look, I talked today to attorney Daniel Wallach. He has been following all of the minutiae of these cases nationwide. He tells me what makes New York markedly different and more of an existential threat to Kalshi and other prediction market platforms are the vast civil enforcement remedies that are available to this state. Kalshee is based in New York, and the AG can claw back unlawful gained profits from wherever they were derived. Doesn't matter if it was Kansas or California or Washington. New York says that could be $36 billion. And that's, that's a statute in New York that has been tested at both the state and the federal level. Cowshee's immediate move was to remove this case from state court in Manhattan to federal court, asking that it be linked to an existing lawsuit against New York gaming regulators. But earlier this month, a federal judge in New York had rejected Kalshee's request to block the state from enforcing its own gambling laws, ruling that the federal commodities law does not automatically preempt state gambling regulations. Kalsi, of course, has appealed. Other states are waging fierce battles as well. Massachusetts, Washington, Michigan, Maryland all have victories. Nevada has a full ban on Couchie and just keeps winning in court. Now Kalshee, with whom CNBC has a commercial relationship, has won important federal rulings in New Jersey and in Minnesota Even in Arizona, this is leaving the courts sharply divided now. And the reason why, I think legal experts all think this is headed for

[Kelly Evans]

Supreme Court, I guess. But they might say it's up to the states in some ways. Like, even so, it feels like this patchwork is sort of what the intention of different states being able to do different things was meant to do. So it's fascinating that New York would be able to claw back Kalshi profits from other states where it might be.

[Contessa Brewer]

That's right, because they're operating in New York and that it's called disgorgement. Interestingly, Wallach, the attorney that I spoke to today on this, said it's at the federal level where Kalshee is winning some victories. At the state level, it keeps losing. And so this question of, and the reason why Kalshee wants it moved to federal court is not to settle the question of is the event contract gambling or not? It's, does a state have the right to preempt the cftc, which is the agency that regulates these prediction markets? And, and this is a really important point Wallach says, maybe unprecedented. The federal regulator is going in and filing lawsuit basically on behalf of the companies that it regulates. It's arguing, hey, don't try to take over what's in my power and my purview.

[Kelly Evans]

Yeah.

[Contessa Brewer]

So this is a very intense legal battle.

[Kelly Evans]

Anything we've learned from the arrival of Uber, Airbnb, the first couple of years, everybody's so happy with the service. And the rest of it is a fight and it's a fight for their survival. And the outcome is yet to be

[Contessa Brewer]

until, until the regulations are clarified, the laws are set, and then you're like, oh, but I love Uber. I'm so glad that the New York taxis didn't have the monopoly over rideshare,

[Kelly Evans]

which is why what the public ultimately wants will play a role here. Contessa. Thanks, Contessa Brewer. Coming up, Microsoft, the second best performer in the Tech ETF this week, it's up 20%. Amazon is meanwhile among the top stocks in discretionary, but only one will come out on top in the race for hyperscaler dominance, at least according to our next guest, Matt Maley of Miller Tabak. He'll tell us who he's betting on next. Welcome back. The biggest question for investors amid the spending binge, which Goldman, by the way, projects will hit $765 billion this year, is which players are going to survive all of this to come out on top and generate long lasting returns in the space that's being put to the test this earnings season with diverging fortunes even this week as the market wonders which of these players will emerge victorious. My next guest says there might be fewer than you think. Let's bring in Matt Maley, the chief market strategist at Miller Taback. And Matt, this goes back to a big fight the market's been having over Oracle and whether they should be one of the survivors or not. Subject, by the way, I think of a New York Times piece this weekend. So how are you thinking about this?

[Matt Maley]

Well, I definitely think that the situation is one where there's going to be fewer. All four, five or six players are not going to win. I think it's going to be more like one or two. And it's just a situation. I mean, we already know where Oracle's admitted that they're worried that one of their, one of their customers, which Everybody assumes is OpenAI is going to break their lease on some of these big data centers. We'll see what happens there. But you know, I like particular Google, which I know has had a tough week this week or sold off, I'm sorry, last week off their earnings. And Amazon, these are the ones that I just think have the whole package to kind of pull things together and ride out any kind of battle that takes place over the coming weeks.

[Kelly Evans]

Yeah, we should really, we should make a graphic at nascar, ask where, you know, we have all these cars in the race. So you're saying Google and Amazon, you've gotten kind of the pole position. Metta and Oracle, you think don't make it through potentially. And obviously we've seen the pressure on their equity, on their debt. Microsoft, you also questioned still even after yesterday and after the stock move.

[Matt Maley]

Yeah, I mean there's definitely a situation. It's funny because you say is Microsoft certainly going to survive? It's a great company, a great management team and it's certainly yesterday's earnings does give you some more confidence that they may be one of the players that does win. The one thing they don't have though, is that, that, you know, the Silicon remote, you know, like with, sorry Google has with their TPU's, that really helps them with their speed, you know, higher speed and, and energy efficiency. Microsoft doesn't have that. So where those other two, they kind of have the whole package that you need to succeed.

[Steven Whiting]

Yeah.

[Matt Maley]

So I'm kind of in between on Microsoft right now.

[Kelly Evans]

Well, and again, what I appreciate about this conversation is not that you or I or anybody have the definitive answer right now, but everyone's trying to figure out, figure this out. And in some cases the balance sheet looks better. In other cases it looks like a bigger risk. That said, when we talk to Brent Thale, who's bullish on Oracle's long term prospects, he, he basically said you've got to trust the management team. They're going for this. They see they've got 5% of the ranch built, he said, and they're all in. I mean, do you sympathize at least with them kind of making this, this bet risk, betting the farm, so to speak?

[Matt Maley]

Well, Kelly, I mean the one thing is, you know that betting against Larry Ellison has never been a real good idea. So I do, you know, I'm so, I am sympathetic with that, that argument. But you know, it's just the amazing amount of, of spending that they put in and when they, they themselves are the ones admitting that they may have a tough time monetizing this to the way that they had been thinking even six months ago and certainly a year ago, that does bring up, bring the situation into question. And it goes to the debt issue that you mentioned with their, you know, their credit spreads are widening out, their credit default swaps are getting much more expensive and it shows that people are getting nervous about their debt as well.

[Kelly Evans]

All right, Google and Amazon, those are your two horses for now. Matt, thanks very much. It's good to see you.

[Matt Maley]

Thanks, Kelly.

[Kelly Evans]

Matt Malley of Miller Tabak. And that's it for us. Thanks for watching the exchange. Don't go anywhere yet though. On Power Lunch, we're sitting down with speaking of nascar, Jimmy Johnson. Wow. Seven time NASCAR Cup Series champ. I will join Brian for that. Very much excited for it. We'll see you after the break.

[Announcer]

Trading at Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade. Unlocking the power of thinkorswim. The award winning trading platforms loaded with features that let you dive deeper into the market. Visualize your trades in a new light on thinkorswim desktop with robust charting and analysis tools all while you uncover new opportunities with up to the minute market news and insights. ThinkOrSwim is available on desktop, web and mobile to meet you where you are. It's built by the trading obsessed to help you trade brilliantly. Learn [e-mail] trading.