Inside the Harvard vs. Trump Battle

Summary

The Journal: Inside the Harvard vs. Trump Battle

Hosted by Kate Linebaugh and Ryan Knutson, with Jessica Mendoza

Introduction

In the April 23, 2025 episode of The Journal, Jessica Mendoza and Doug Belkin delve into the escalating conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard University. This battle epitomizes the broader struggle between conservative political forces and the increasingly liberal landscape of American higher education. The episode provides a comprehensive overview of the financial and ideological tensions that have brought these two powerful entities to a head.

Trump Administration's Targeting of Higher Education

The Trump administration has been systematically targeting leading universities across the nation, accusing them of fostering anti-American and Marxist ideologies. This strategic move aims to curtail federal funding for institutions perceived as politically left-leaning.

“The Trump administration is threatening to withhold $9 billion in funding to Harvard, one of America's most prestigious universities. Why does it matter that it's Harvard University?” — Doug Belkin [00:59]

Harvard, with its substantial endowment of approximately $53 billion, stands as the wealthiest university in the country, making it a formidable opponent capable of resisting the administration’s financial pressures.

“Harvard is the wealthiest university in the nation, with an endowment of about $53 billion. So if anybody has the wherewithal to stand up and fight the Trump administration, it's going to be Harvard University.” — Doug Belkin [00:17]

The Battle Intensifies: Harvard in the Crosshairs

The conflict reached a critical point when the Task Force to Combat Antisemitism, established by the Trump administration, issued a series of demands to Harvard. These demands included the elimination of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and a review of academic content and hiring practices deemed to fuel anti-Semitic harassment.

“Harvard received that list in early April. It included the request to review programs that, quote, fuel anti Semitic harassment. But it also took on university culture more broadly.” — Jessica Mendoza [06:25]

Harvard’s refusal to comply with these vague and overreaching demands prompted the administration to freeze $2.2 billion in funding and threatened to revoke the university's tax-exempt status, a critical component of its financial model.

“They cracked down. They had threatened to freeze a bunch of money. They moved forward and do freeze $2.2 billion.” — Doug Belkin [10:26]

Harvard's Response: Defiance and Legal Action

In a bold move, Harvard publicly rejected the administration’s demands by publishing the task force's letter on its website, signaling a clear stance against perceived governmental overreach.

“Harvard takes the letter and publishes it with a note saying, this is overreach. This cannot stand.” — Doug Belkin [09:04]

Subsequently, Harvard initiated a lawsuit challenging the legality of the funding freeze and the demands imposed by the Task Force. The university argues that these actions infringe upon its First Amendment rights and academic freedom, asserting that the administration's interference could have devastating long-term effects on its operations and research capabilities.

“Harvard is now suing the Trump administration over the administration's threats.” — Doug Belkin [11:53]

Reactions and Wider Implications

The legal battle has garnered significant support from other higher education institutions, with hundreds of college presidents voicing solidarity with Harvard. This unity underscores a broader concern about the potential erosion of academic independence and the future of federally funded research.

“There was just a letter signed by a couple hundred college presidents saying we are behind Harvard. So they want to defend it.” — Doug Belkin [14:28]

The outcome of this dispute holds profound implications for the landscape of American higher education. A loss for Harvard could set a precedent that undermines the autonomy of universities nationwide, disrupting funding streams essential for groundbreaking research and educational excellence.

“This will change the course of higher education? Absolutely.” — Doug Belkin [15:19]

Conversely, if Harvard prevails, it could reinforce the sanctity of academic independence, but Belkin suggests that the administration's aggressive stance may persist, potentially leading to further confrontations with other institutions.

“This administration is very, very aggressive. I can only imagine that they would figure out different levers to come at them.” — Doug Belkin [15:52]

Conclusion: What Lies Ahead

The Harvard vs. Trump administration battle epitomizes a pivotal moment in the intersection of education, politics, and power in the United States. As Harvard leverages its vast resources and alumni support to resist financial coercion, the broader higher education sector watches closely, recognizing that the outcome could redefine academic freedom and federal involvement in university governance.

“Harvard has a $53 billion endowment and maybe they can live without the money for a little while.” — Doug Belkin [13:48]

The episode concludes by highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the future of this conflict, emphasizing that the stakes extend far beyond Harvard, potentially reshaping the very foundations of higher education in America.

Notable Quotes

• “This is sort of the most dramatic moment in higher education probably in my lifetime.” — Doug Belkin [01:14]
• “If you get to follow your own curiosity... they're in the best position to figure out because they're closest to their work, where that should go.” — Doug Belkin [07:52]
• “We are going to choke off the money to schools that aid the Marxist assault on our American heritage and on Western civilization itself.” — Doug Belkin [04:45]
• “Taxpayer funds are a privilege and Harvard fails to meet the basic conditions required to access that privilege.” — White House spokesperson [13:00]

Final Thoughts

The Harvard vs. Trump episode of The Journal offers a detailed exploration of a landmark clash that could redefine the role of federal funding and governmental oversight in higher education. By capturing the strategic maneuvers, ideological battles, and potential ramifications, the episode provides listeners with a nuanced understanding of one of the most significant struggles shaping American universities today.

Transcript

[Jessica Mendoza]

For the past couple months, the Trump administration has been targeting higher education, homing in on some of the nation's top universities. The Trump administration making good on its.

[Doug Belkin]

Threat to cancel $400 million in federal.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Grants to Columbia University. The federal funding freeze. At the University of Pennsylvania. The Trump administration is pausing nearly $200 million in funds. The Trump administration raises $1 billion in funding for Cornell University and $790 million for Northwestern University. And now the administration has set its sights on its most high profile target yet, Harvard. The Trump administration is threatening to withhold $9 billion in funding to Harvard, one of America's most prestigious universities. Why does it matter that it's Harvard University?

[Doug Belkin]

Harvard is the wealthiest university in the nation, with endowment of about $53 billion. So if anybody has the wherewithal to stand up and fight the Trump administration, it's going to be Harvard University.

[Jessica Mendoza]

That's my colleague Doug Belkin, who covers higher education.

[Doug Belkin]

The forces that are at play here are a university system across the country that has moved to the left, and the President is attempting essentially a course correction by what the university sees, an invasion of their independence. So this is the culmination of forces that have been heading toward each other, toward a collision for two generations. This is sort of the most dramatic moment in higher education probably in my lifetime. It's been building and building and, and this is really a perfect storm of politics, finance, power coming together and crashing, and it's all being manifest between Trump and Harvard.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Welcome to the Journal, our show about money, business and power. I'm Jessica Mendoza. It's Wednesday, April 23rd. Coming up on the show, the battle over higher education has come for Harvard.

[Shopify Ad]

This episode is brought to you by Shopify. Upgrade your business with Shopify, home of the number one checkout on the planet. Shop pay boosts conversions up to 50%, meaning fewer carts going abandoned and more sales going cha ching. So if you're into growing your business, get a commerce platform that's ready to sell wherever your customers are. Visit shopify.com to upgrade your selling today.

[Jessica Mendoza]

In many ways, Doug says the fight between the Trump administration and universities traces its roots back decades, all the way to the 1970s as the schools begin.

[Doug Belkin]

To integrate and there are more kids who are black and Latina and Asian coming on campuses. In Jewish, we move from this sort of Western civilization curriculum to criticism of the West. And so you get a lot of sort of critical theorists saying the west is colonialist, imperialistic, racist, patriarchal, and faculty move in that direction.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Surveys from multiple universities have shown that in recent years, a greater percentage of faculty identify as liberal rather than conservative. And when it comes to public perception, polls say that Americans believe colleges generally lean left.

[Doug Belkin]

Conservatives argue that it's become an echo chamber where they're no longer allowing the discussion of other points of view. And that's where the friction really grinds the gears of the conservatives.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Fast forward to 2023. Hamas attacked Israel. On October 7, Israel struck back and the war in Gaza began. In the U.S. protests erupted on college campuses over Israel's treatment of civilians in Gaza. These protests riled up a lot of conservatives who saw them as anti Semitic and an attack on America's historic support of Israel and on Western values. And so where does Trump come into all of this?

[Doug Belkin]

So he. As the frustration rises, Trump seizes on this just as he seizes on the frustration with immigration. And conservatives are angry at universities. And so he articulates their anger. And he says, the universities have been taken over by, you know, Marxists, progressive, radical, leftist professors, and I'm going to stop it. We are going to choke off the money to schools that aid the Marxist assault on our American heritage and on Western civilization itself.

[Jessica Mendoza]

The president didn't waste much time. Soon after taking office, his administration put together a group, the Task Force to Combat Antisemitism. The White House said the task force was specifically created to root out antisemitic harassment in schools and college campuses. The group's members come from a range of backgrounds, from the acting general counsel of the Health and Human Services Department, to a former Fox News commentator, to a government official who spent much of his career in finance. Last month, the task force turned its attention to Columbia University. The Trump administration froze $400 million in federal funding at the university and demanded a series of changes, things like banning masks and empowering campus police. Columbia agreed to the demands, though negotiations are ongoing.

[Doug Belkin]

And Harvard looks at this and says, we don't want to be in this situation. And so Harvard reaches out to the task force. The task force comes back with kind of a broad list of demands.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Harvard received that list in early April. It included the request to review programs that, quote, fuel anti Semitic harassment. But it also took on university culture more broadly. Like the task force wanted Harvard to end diversity, equity and inclusion programs, or dei, or else lose federal funding. But the task force didn't specify what Harvard needed to do to actually meet those requests. So Harvard asked for more direction. And on April 11, the university got a letter back.

[Doug Belkin]

So the letter says, we wanted to make sure who you're hiring, who you're admitting what they're teaching, how it's being looked at. And Harvard sees this list as tremendous overreach. They are trying to determine what can be taught, what can be researched. This is how Harvard sees it, what viewpoint diversity should consist of, and then it needs to be audited by an external party.

[Jessica Mendoza]

And why were these demands such a non starter for Harvard?

[Doug Belkin]

So what makes the United States higher education system so effective and what makes it different from others is that we have a very ground up, decentralized system. Federal government gives a lot of money to these universities, but they also give them a tremendous amount of independence. We have a system of accreditation which helps the universities really maintain their independence and regulate themselves.

[Jessica Mendoza]

From the university perspective, that unique academic freedom is crucial to creative and innovative output.

[Doug Belkin]

If you get to follow your own curiosity. If researchers get to, they decide what they want to figure out and study and follow, they're in the best position to figure out because they're closest to their work, where that should go. And so innovation on American college campuses is stunning.

[Jessica Mendoza]

So Harvard and other universities are feeling like if you start to tell us what to do, that innovation is going to die because we are the ones who know what the work looks like. We are the ones who know where that money should go.

[Doug Belkin]

Right. And if you start to dictate, to us, that's a slippery slope to fascism. That's authoritarianism. That's. President Trump gets to tell universities how to think what the professors need to teach. And that sets off all sorts of alarm bells.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said that because the funds come from the federal government, quote, we want to make sure that you're abiding by federal law. She added that the administration is not trying to take away academic freedom. And then Harvard made an unexpected move.

[Doug Belkin]

Harvard takes the letter and publishes it with a note saying, this is overreach. This cannot stand.

[Jessica Mendoza]

After the break, the fight escalates.

[Ad Council]

If only life had a remote control, you could pause or rewind. Well, life doesn't always give you time to change the outcome. But Prediabetes does take the 1 minute risk test today at do I have prediabetes.org brought to you by the Ad Council and its Prediabetes awareness partners.

[Jessica Mendoza]

On April 14, the president of Harvard, Alan Garber, published the Trump administration's letter to the school's website. In a message, Garber wrote that the university would not accept the administration's demands. Trump's antisemitism task force was furious. Its members said that they made clear that they Wanted to keep the discussions with the university private. Harvard disputes that there was any agreement about confidentiality. The task force reacted quickly.

[Doug Belkin]

They cracked down. They had threatened to freeze a bunch of money. They moved forward and do freeze $2.2 billion.

[Jessica Mendoza]

And that's not all. They also made the first moves to revoke Harvard's tax exempt status.

[Doug Belkin]

Almost all universities, all the universities that you think of when you think of a university, a flagship, a public flagship, a big private, they're all tax exempt. There are for profit schools that are exceptions. But yeah, I mean, most of the schools in the United States are tax exempt.

[Jessica Mendoza]

And being tax exempt is a big deal to these universities.

[Doug Belkin]

Yeah, it's really important to the business model of the university. So first of all, they don't pay property taxes, so that's a big deal. If you write a check for $100 million to Harvard, then you get to knock off your, what you're going to pay on taxes. So there's a huge incentive for donors to give.

[Jessica Mendoza]

The task force also threatened to challenge whether or not Harvard could continue to enroll international students whose tuition is a critical part of the university's income. All said what's at stake for Harvard here is losing tons of funding. Alan Garber, the university president, has said that the consequences would be severe, that it would impact research related to childhood cancer, infectious disease outbreaks, and easing the pain of soldiers wounded in battle. On Monday night, Harvard took the dispute to court.

[Ad Council]

Breaking news in our politics lead.

[Doug Belkin]

Harvard University is now suing the Trump administration over the administration's threats to.

[Jessica Mendoza]

What are sort of the main reasons that Harvard gives for suing?

[Doug Belkin]

Well, the two big ones are freedom of speech. That when the Trump administration wants to tell the university who to hire, what to study, what to research that is infringing on the university's First Amendment freedom of speech, academic freedom is connected to that. And so they don't have the wherewithal to do that. The second case is that if they want to pull this money, there's a process that they need to follow according to the law that's time consuming and takes a long time. They can't just willy nilly pull this money out. And so they're saying this is a capricious move and the damage could be very, very long lasting. And so you don't do this sort of thing quickly.

[Jessica Mendoza]

In the suit, Harvard asks the court to halt the funding freeze. It also wants the court to declare that both the freeze and the demands asked of the university are illegal. And has the Trump administration responded to.

[Doug Belkin]

The lawsuit yet they've essentially said, see you in court. They've said that Harvard University needs to address the civil rights violations on their campus. And when they get their house in order, then they'll be entitled to federal funds. Well, one of the things that the government says is, you know, if they don't want to make the changes we have, which the government believes means treating everybody fairly on campus, protecting everybody equally on campus, if they don't want to do that, then they can operate without federal research funding.

[Jessica Mendoza]

In response to the lawsuit, a White House spokesperson said, quote, taxpayer funds are a privilege and Harvard fails to meet the basic conditions required to access that privilege. Can Harvard survive without this money?

[Doug Belkin]

Harvard has a $53 billion endowment and maybe they can live without the money for a little while. You know, they don't have to start firing people immediately. They can tap their endowment. They have an option to. And so they're a little bit unusual in that situation. So they're sort of, they're the alpha in higher education on that front.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Harvard has also raised money recently from its alumni as well as by issuing bonds.

[Doug Belkin]

And there's been a huge surge in donations since Harvard said they would stand up. So they have a lot to gain from their supporters.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Other universities are responding positively to Harvard's position on this.

[Doug Belkin]

Yeah, there's been a lot of. There was just a letter signed by a couple hundred college presidents saying we are behind Harvard. So they want to defend it. When people ask me what I cover and they asked me to distill higher education, I say university's posture toward the federal government for a long time has been leave us alone. But by the way, we need a lot of money from you guys to make this work. The mistake the university made was they allowed themselves, I think, to get to be perceived as no longer working for the majority of Americans. And that made them low hanging fruit for political administration.

[Jessica Mendoza]

What could it mean for higher education if Harvard loses?

[Doug Belkin]

This will change the course of higher education? Absolutely. Universities, especially research universities around the country, absolutely depend on federal dollars to operate and to do the research that Americans have. Depend on that the economy runs on. If that stops, then a system will change and we don't know exactly how, but this is what's at stake right now.

[Jessica Mendoza]

If Harvard did win, would things just return to a status quo or I guess what could the outcome be?

[Doug Belkin]

This administration is very, very aggressive. I can only imagine that they would figure out different levers to come at them. They want this address, they want this whole worldview shifted. I don't think they're gonna stop.

[Jessica Mendoza]

That's all for today. Wednesday, April 23. The Journal is a co production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. Additional reporting in this episode from Sarah Randazzo, Brian Schwartz, and Liz Esley White. Thanks for listening. See you tomorrow.