Inside Trump's Fundraising Machine

Summary

---

The Journal. — Inside Trump’s Fundraising Machine

Air date: August 6, 2026
Hosts: Jessica Mendoza, Ryan Knutson
Guests: Josh Dawsey, Dana Mattioli (WSJ Reporters)

---

Episode Overview

This episode provides an in-depth investigation into the unprecedented fundraising apparatus surrounding President Donald Trump’s second term. Wall Street Journal reporters Josh Dawsey and Dana Mattioli examine how Trump and his team have mobilized corporate America to raise over $800 million for pet projects, political causes, and a network of committees. They unpack the tactics, the key players—most notably chief fundraiser Meredith O’Rourke—and the implications for influence and access in Washington.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. How Trump’s Fundraising Has Evolved

• From Outsider to Fundraiser:
  • Early political persona: Trump campaigned against traditional fundraising, vowing to "drain the swamp" ([04:14–04:52]).
  • Quote:

    “Few of them drew the excitement and the palpable enthusiasm from the crowd than this ‘drain the swamp’, this outsider message that... we’re taking on all the big donors. No longer are you going to have these kinds of creatures controlling America.” — Josh Dawsey (04:26)

  • Initially derided PACs and disavowed donor events ([04:52–05:08]).
• Turnaround for 2024:
  • Suzy Wiles, then chief of staff, persuades Trump to adopt aggressive fundraising tactics, including regular donor “call time” ([05:54–06:31]).
  • Trump discovered success with direct, high-dollar asks and embraced it.

2. The Sheer Scale and Structure of the Operation

• Over $800 million raised since returning to the White House (01:34).
• Unlike typical presidential fundraising, Trump’s activities are relentless and spread across numerous vehicles:
  • Nonprofits, super PACs, and committees for projects like the White House ballroom, his planned Miami skyscraper library, the “Garden of Heroes,” and more ([07:58–08:40]).
  • Quote:

    “He’s created so many different funds and committees that you can give to almost anything.” — Josh Dawsey (07:58)

• Major beneficiaries:
  • MAGA Inc. Super PAC: Receives ~$400 million, backed by billionaires, companies, and individuals ([07:11]).
  • Issue-oriented groups: “Securing American Greatness,” “Trust for the National Mall,” etc.

3. Corporate America’s Deep Engagement and What it Buys

• Notable Donors & Amounts ([09:10–10:16]):
  • Meta: $22M to library via settlement + $10M to Trump-aligned C4. Mark Zuckerberg now a regular at Trump events.
  • Apple: $25M for the ballroom project.
  • Microsoft: $10M for the ballroom.
  • Amazon: $5M for the ballroom.
  • SoftBank: $50M to the library.
  • TikTok: $2M for Freedom 250 event.
  • Oracle & ExxonMobil: Over $1M each to Freedom 250.
• Transactional Nature of Contributions:
  • Access in exchange for donations: Special Oval Office tours, White House dinners, Mar-A-Lago events, exclusive meetings ([14:55]).
  • Quote:

    “You’re either on the naughty list or the nice list, because he’s watching who is giving.” — Dana Mattioli (14:08)

  • Perception Shift:
    • Corporate titans like Zuckerberg and Altman, absent in 2016, are now major donors ([15:19–15:44]).
    • Quote:

      “In 2016, there were no high profile CEOs behind the President during his inauguration... They weren’t writing big checks like we see now.” — Dana Mattioli (15:19)

4. The Central Role of Meredith O’Rourke – “Princess of Darkness”

• Chief fundraiser; not a government employee but the gatekeeper for donor outreach ([11:15–14:32]).
• Quote:

  “My nickname is the Princess of Darkness.” — via Josh Dawsey, describing O'Rourke’s fearsome reputation among donors (11:15)

• Personality: Formidable and persistent—recipients feel compelled to answer her calls or risk being on the “naughty list.”
• Close advisor; regularly sits in on White House meetings and checks in with Trump nightly to review donor lists and strategy ([13:42–14:08]).

5. Political and Ethical Implications

• Direct Correlation:
  • Donations appear to precede favorable administrative actions or meetings:
    • Example: Tobacco executives donated millions, followed by favorable FDA policy changes on vaping ([16:27–16:43]).
    • Lockheed Martin: >$10M donated and awarded a $35B defense contract, plus another $5M pledged for a White House helipad ([16:43]).
  • Quote:

    “He’s really centralized government power...if you want to stay in his good favor...Meredith O’Rourke is a key person for you to give money to, to return her calls and to make sure that she likes you.” — Josh Dawsey (15:51)

• Lack of Oversight:
  • Legal gaps: No prohibitions or mandatory disclosures for most of these donations.
  • Diminished DOJ Public Integrity Section; potential for future Congressional scrutiny, especially if party control shifts ([17:53]).
  • Companies may eventually have to answer uncomfortable questions about quid pro quo.

6. The Big Picture: What Makes Trump’s Approach Unique

• A fundamental shift in the relationship between the presidency and big business.
• Massive corporate donations in exchange for political access, regulatory rewinds, or contracts is not the norm—even for incumbent presidents.
• Quote:

  “I think we’re seeing corporate America act in a way that is just very uncharacteristic...a different bending of the knee going on that we really haven’t seen in some time.” — Dana Mattioli (18:37) “The question is whether or not that’s a smart long term bet for these companies or not.” — Josh Dawsey (19:11)

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “This is going to be probably the finest ballroom ever built.” — Unnamed Commentator (00:16)
• “If you want to give money to Trump, there’s basically a menu of options like you would see at a restaurant...” — Josh Dawsey (07:58)
• “You’re either on the naughty list or the nice list, because he’s watching who is giving.” — Dana Mattioli (14:08)
• “In 2016 ... the biggest CEO during that point was, like, the MyPillow guy, right?” — Dana Mattioli (15:19)
• “A lot of these companies have made a pretty audacious short term bet. ... The question is whether or not that’s a smart long term bet for these companies or not.” — Josh Dawsey (19:11)

---

Timestamps for Important Segments

• Trump’s second-term fundraising: background and scale — 01:08–01:49
• Trump’s early anti-fundraising stance — 04:08–05:40
• Key personnel: Suzy Wiles & Meredith O’Rourke — 05:54–06:31; 12:57–14:32
• Breakdown of projects and fundraising vehicles — 07:11–08:40
• Major corporate donations revealed — 09:10–11:00
• Mechanics and influence of access — 14:55–15:44
• Discussion of regulatory and ethical issues — 16:27–17:53
• Long-term implications for companies & post-Trump future — 18:37–19:47

---

Tone and Style Reflection

True to The Journal's style: factual, balanced, and investigative but with a hint of dry wit, especially when underscoring the sheer audacity and scale of Trump’s fundraising. The episode is brisk and detailed, letting the reporting—and the numbers—underscore both the uniqueness and the controversy of this fundraising machine.

---

Conclusion

This episode uncovers how Trump’s fundraising machine—supercharged by corporate donors and orchestrated by powerful operatives—has reshaped the relationship between business and government in Washington. The result is an environment where access and favor appear ever more closely tied to eye-popping contributions—legally permissible under current rules, but raising questions that may haunt both political and corporate leaders for years to come.

Transcript

[Jessica Mendoza]

Ever since President Donald Trump returned to office last year, he's been advocating for all kinds of special projects, things like a ballroom in the White House.

[Unnamed Commentator]

This is going to be probably the finest ballroom ever built.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Or his presidential library for when his term ends.

[Unnamed Commentator]

It's going to be most likely a hotel. You know, this concept could be office, but it's most likely going to be a hotel with a beautiful building underneath. A 747 Air Force One in the lobby.

[Jessica Mendoza]

There's also his recent Freedom 250 celebration in D.C. to commemorate the nation's 250th anniversary.

[Unnamed Commentator]

We'll see the iconic Washington Monument illuminated with festive birthday lights to honor the start of this historic anniversary year.

[Jessica Mendoza]

These projects all run into the millions of dollars. And a team of Wall Street Journal reporters has been looking into the fundraising efforts that are making them possible. Here's our colleague, Josh Dawsey.

[Josh Dawsey]

Most presidents in their second term in office are not fundraising nonstop like this. It just hasn't been done before. The President's put together this unprecedented apparatus to raise money for all sorts of causes and was really relying on corporate America for much of this money.

[Jessica Mendoza]

And as far as, you know, how much money has the President raised since returning to office?

[Dana Mattioli]

We were able to piece together at least $800 million that he's raised through different vehicles, be it the ballroom or the library. And some of these are really sizable checks.

[Jessica Mendoza]

That's our colleague Dana Mattioli, who's also been looking into Trump's fundraising.

[Dana Mattioli]

Many of these companies writing checks have, you know, business before the government. They're seeking federal contracts. They might have regulatory decisions coming down the pike as it relates to antitrust. They are lobbying on different things like appropriations. And they all know that President Trump is watching who is cutting checks and who isn't.

[Jessica Mendoza]

As the Wall Street Journal team kept digging, a picture started to form of Trump's round the clock fundraising machine. One that involves high profile companies and hundreds of millions of dollars. At the center of it is a powerful political operative whom Trump himself has dubbed the Princess of D. Welcome to the Journal, our show about money, business and power. I'm Jessica Mendoza. It's Thursday, August 6th. Coming up on the show, a look inside Trump's massive fundraising operation.

[Sponsor Voice 1]

This episode of the Journal is brought to you by Harvey, an AI platform designed for legal and professional services. Built and tested by lawyers. Harvey is trusted by more than 60% of the AmLaw100. The platform dramatically reduces time spent on research, drafting and document review without sacrificing quality, all while meeting the highest industry standards for security and compliance. Harvey AI tailored for law. Visit Harvey AI to learn more and request a demo.

[Sponsor Voice 2]

This episode is brought to you by wss. Soccer fandom is big business, but for families, it's also personal. The jersey, the team colors, the tradition of watching matches together. That's why WSS makes it easy to find official soccer jerseys and gear for the whole squad, offering the best value on sportswear, sneakers, and everything your family needs. Shop now at your local WSS or [e-mail].

[Jessica Mendoza]

Trump wasn't always big on fundraising. In fact, when he first entered politics, he campaigned against it.

[Josh Dawsey]

I mean, the cri de corps was drain the swamp.

[Unnamed Commentator]

If I'm elected president, we are going to drain the swamp. In Washington, D.C. and there were these

[Josh Dawsey]

forceful chants at rallies and all of the things that the President said in his insurgent 2016 campaign. Few of them drew the excitement and the palpable enthusiasm from the crowd than this drained the swamp, this outsider message that we're coming into Washington, we're taking on the entrenched interests, we're taking on the lobbyists, we're taking on all the big donors. No longer are you going to have these kinds of creatures controlling America.

[Dana Mattioli]

When he was running for president for the first term, he called political action committees a scam. And he said he was going to return all the money associated with these outside PACs back to the donors, even though this money would have been in support of him.

[Jessica Mendoza]

It wasn't just rhetoric. Throughout his first term, Trump resisted having to deal with donors. And this was his stance for years.

[Josh Dawsey]

I mean, his aides, even in the 2020 campaign, sometimes had to cajole and beg to get him to attend some of these events. And he would be compl, like, why do I have to take photos with all of these people? And then he would give a speech and leave and he would be. He would be miserable. And I had several of his aides described to me him being on Air Force One and just complaining relentlessly about having to do all of these fundraisers.

[Jessica Mendoza]

But in the lead up to the 2024 election, Trump's attitude started to change around that time. Susie Wiles, now his chief of staff, convinced him to spend more time talking to donors.

[Josh Dawsey]

Suzy convinced him to do call time. And call time is hours that politicians spend every week on the phone calling people, asking them for money, right? Just calling them, sitting there in a computer, ring, ring, ring. Can you give me this? Can you give me this? And so Susie convinced the President to start doing call time every week, a few hours. And then he realized that some of these people, if you made these audacious asks, you said, I want two and a half million dollars, I want five million dollars. Some of these people would say yes. And he suddenly began so enjoying the pursuit of getting this money.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Of course, it's normal for candidates to raise money during campaigns. And to be clear, no laws prohibit presidents from raising unlimited sums of money for nonprofits like the ones used for the ballroom in Trump's presidential library, his super pac, or political issue committees. Nor are they required to disclose who their donors are for most of these transactions. But the amounts Trump is pulling in are unheard of. More than $800 million since returning to the White. A lot of the money he's raised goes to political organizations that support him, including about 400 million to a Super PAC his allies have created.

[Dana Mattioli]

He's got this MAGA Inc. PAC that lots of different billionaires, companies, individuals support that has a giant war chest that he's very much actively fundraising for. You know, he sends out emails to his donor base. So he's really done a 180 on this and embraced it big time.

[Jessica Mendoza]

The money he's raised also goes to nonprofits that then fund issues and projects that Trump supports. One organization that's received millions is Securing American Greatness, a political committee that highlights conservative issues such as lowering taxes and reducing crime. Another nonprofit, called the Trust for the National Mall, is helping fund Trump's ballroom project. It's collected more than $34 million since the 2024 election.

[Josh Dawsey]

He's raising money for this ballroom that he's building at the White House. He's raising money for various other construction projects around Washington. He's raising money for his library that's going to be a 50 story tall skyscraper in Miami that he is building. Not a traditional presidential library. Right. He has a garden of heroes that he's building, a statue garden. He's working on a golf course in Washington. I mean, someone told me that if you want to give money to Trump, there's basically a menu of options like you would see at a restaurant, like, do you want to give it here? Do you want to give it here? Do you want to give it here? He's created so many different funds and committees that, you know, you can give to almost anything.

[Jessica Mendoza]

A spokeswoman for the president said he is the, quote, most successful fundraiser in modern political history and that Trump plans to use the money to help Republicans in the midterms and continue advancing private sector initiatives. She said, quote, one thing has never changed. President Trump can't be bought. Let's talk about some of the companies that have donated to Trump. One of the ones that comes to mind is Meta. Can you talk about Meta's relationship with the administration, like how it has developed since Trump was reelected?

[Dana Mattioli]

Trump really had a grudge with them about the 2020 election, where he alleged that they had interfered in a way that resulted in the outcome of that. So, you know, Meta had been very nervous heading into this administration, given that Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, was such a target of the President's ire. And they've gone to great pains to try to repair that relationship. And what we were able to learn is that in addition to the $22 million payment that they made to the Presidential library through a legal settlement that they settled, they also recently gave $10 million to that Trump aligned, C4, securing American greatness.

[Jessica Mendoza]

These days, Zuckerberg is a regular guest at Trump's fundraising events. So is OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Last year, OpenAI co founder and president Greg Brockman and his wife also personally contributed $25 million to Trump's super PAC. And they're not the only ones. There are a ton of other donors, corporate donors, named in your story. Can you just name a few and the projects that they've donated to?

[Dana Mattioli]

Yeah. We were able to reveal through the story in our reporting that Apple gave a $25 million check for the White House Ballroom project. Microsoft gave around $10 million to that project, and Amazon shipped in around $5 million. SoftBank donated $50 million to the Presidential library. And then there were other initiatives that we learned about, too. Freedom 250, which was an organization set up to fundraise for the nation's 250th birthday, raised over $50 million from corporate sponsors. TikTok gave $2 million to that. We learned that Oracle and Exxon Mobil also gave more than $1 million to that event.

[Jessica Mendoza]

And when it comes to which of the President's causes to give to and how much, all these companies often have to go through one person. Trump's chief fundraiser. Her name is Meredith o'. Rourke.

[Josh Dawsey]

My nickname is the Princess of Darkness. And the President calls her this because she's such a, quote, unquote, killer with donors.

[Dana Mattioli]

I spoke to a lot of people at the companies that interact with her, and they all say that she's really charming, very persistent, and she's someone. When you see her number come up on your cell phone, you have to answer.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Why so much of corporate America has to answer o' Rourke's calls is after the break.

[Sponsor Voice 1]

This episode is brought to you by Claude Cowork. Cowork brings the agentic power of Claude code to your desktop so anyone can use it and have Claude do real work. Point it at a folder or connect tools like Google Drive describe what you need, and it handles the rest. Organizing files, building spreadsheets, drafting reports from scattered notes, even use it to plan out your week and stay ahead. Hand off the tedious work. Get started at Claude AI TheJournal AI

[Sponsor Voice 2]

is moving fast across the enterprise, but without visibility, it's just chaos. Different tools, different models, different teams using AI in completely different ways. ServiceNow turns that chaos into control. With the AI control tower, you see all your AI across the business in one place, what it's doing, what it's done, and what it's about to do. So you stay in control. To put AI to work for people, visit servicenow.com.

[Jessica Mendoza]

Meredith o' Rourke has worked with Trump since the first time he ran for president, during the 2016 and 2020 elections. Her deep connections to donors in Florida made her a key ally in that state.

[Josh Dawsey]

She got to know a lot of Trump's operatives and allies from Florida, much of the White House now, from his chief of staff to lots of his top aides. All hell from Florida. And she was a prominent Florida fundraiser. And then in 2024, she sort of became his chief fundraiser. She followed him around the country. She orchestrated events everywhere for him. And then after he won, she was sort of planning to slow down fundraising for a while. And the president said, no, I want you to sort of strike while the iron is hot. So for the last year and a half, she's been a key figure in his inner circle.

[Jessica Mendoza]

O' Rourke is not a government employee, but she often sits in on meetings between Trump and corporate executives, taking notes, according to Wall Street Journal reporting. She also travels with top officials in Air Force One. On social media, she's described Trump as a mentor. And Trump and o' Rourke check in frequently about their fundraising progress. Almost every night, the two speak on the phone about which companies are cutting checks and which aren't.

[Dana Mattioli]

One public company chairman told me, you're either on the naughty list or the nice list, because he's watching who is giving.

[Jessica Mendoza]

According to people with knowledge of their calls, Trump tells o' Rourke how much money to ask for. For some donors, the ask is 5 million. For others, it's 50 million. He also gives her names to Call, often including people who recently met with him.

[Dana Mattioli]

She'll call up heads of government relations, sometimes CEOs, and she'll say, you know, this is very important to the President. He's asked me to call you and ask for this donation. And then it sort of goes from there. And they figure out which vehicle to bring it to. Is it the ballroom? Is it the library? Is it MAGA Inc. Is it securing American greatness? But they all said, like, they have to pick up her call.

[Jessica Mendoza]

In exchange for their donations, corporate leaders can get special Oval Office tours with the president or candlelight dinners at the White House or at one of Trump's properties. Like Mar A Lago, business executives told the Wall Street Journal that this administration is much more transactional than prior ones. And several CEOs and board members said they believe there's a link between contributions and access to the president.

[Dana Mattioli]

There's definitely a marked change between 2016 from corporate America and what we're seeing now. If you remember, in 2016, there were no high profile CEOs behind the President during his inauguration. I think, like, the biggest CEO during that point was, like, the MyPillow guy, right? It wasn't Bezos and Zuckerberg and that echelon of people. They weren't writing big checks like we see now.

[Jessica Mendoza]

And what has your reporting shown about why these big companies are now so much more willing to give money to the President?

[Josh Dawsey]

He's really centralized government power in a lot of ways, over regulations, over agencies, and sort of has gotten involved in big decisions that companies care a lot about. And so if you want to stay in his good favor, if you want to be invited to the Oval, if you want to be in these meetings, if you want to be in the Rose Garden for these dinners, Right? Meredith o' Rourke is a key person for you to give money to, to return her calls and to make sure that she likes you. Right? So part of her power here is that she's been designated by the President of the United States to hold this role that really few people have held ever.

[Dana Mattioli]

Josh had some great reporting about tobacco executives meeting with Trump at a fundraiser and him collecting millions of dollars at that fundraiser. And then shortly thereafter, there were changes at the FDA about different flavor vaping devices.

[Jessica Mendoza]

At the time, a White House spokesman said that the FDA's regulatory treatment of vapes is, quote, rooted in recent evidence that has found they can help adults quit smoking. Then there's contractor Lockheed Martin. In the last couple of years, the company gave more than $10 million to America's 250th anniversary and to infrastructure projects in the D.C. area. That's according to people familiar with the matter. A company spokesperson said, quote, lockheed Martin has a long history of supporting projects in Both the Washington, D.C. area and across the country. The spokesperson added that its engagement with the government is guided by compliance standards and follows applicable laws and regulations. In June, the Pentagon awarded Lockheed Martin a defense contract worth up to $35 billion. A few weeks later, Trump revealed that Lockheed has agreed to pay roughly $5 million toward a new helipad at the White House. Taking a quick step back, is there any type of oversight that looks at what the president does and how he fundraises? You know, we've said before that there aren't any laws that prevent the president from raising this kind of money. But as you said, you know, what Trump is doing is pretty unique.

[Josh Dawsey]

Traditionally, right. You would have a Department of justice in the Public Integrity section that's been all but decimated under this administration of this Department of Justice. I certainly think if Democrats win the House of Representatives, based on our reporting, they will be doing some oversight of this. And a lot of these publicly traded companies then could be forced to explain, what were you promised by the administration? What happened to that fundraiser? Why did you go, why did you cut that large check? And that could be really uncomfortable.

[Jessica Mendoza]

So after all your reporting, what do you guys make of Trump's success at fundraising and the fact that so much of corporate America is now so willing to donate to the president and his causes?

[Dana Mattioli]

I mean, I think we're seeing corporate America act in a way that is just very uncharacteristic of how they typically act in other administrations. I think if, you know, once Trump is out of office, I can't imagine seeing much of this behavior continue. I think he's such a different president in the way he interacts with companies and what he expects from them. And even, you know, what we've seen in terms of them settling lawsuits with this president, you know, lawsuits that people said were unfounded. I just think there's a different bending of the knee going on that we really haven't seen in some time.

[Josh Dawsey]

A lot of these companies have made a pretty audacious short term bet. But to do business with this administration, to have access to this president, we're going to give large checks. We're going to curry favor with him to a degree that really has not been done in weeks of political history with a sitting president. The question is whether or not that's a smart long term bet for these companies or not.

[Jessica Mendoza]

That's all for today. Thursday, August 6 the Journal is a co production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. Additional reporting in this episode by Emily Glaser, Marianne Levine, Annie Lynskey and Maggie Severns. Thanks for listening. See you tomorrow.

[Sponsor Voice 3]

This episode is brought to you by Snapdragon. Take the leash off your laptop with a processor that gives you long battery life. Work on the go. Jump between back to back calls. Stay locked in from morning to midnight. Get maximum performance even when unplugged. Finally, the freedom to move across the room or across the world is here. Snapdragon. That's how go to snapdragon.com laptops. Snapdragon branded products are products of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. And or its subsidiaries.

[Sponsor Voice 1]

I see you Fire and Ash is now streaming on Disney. It's the film critics are calling the best avatar yet. A true epic and completely jaw dropping.

[Sponsor Voice 2]

This is the only pure thing in this world.

[Sponsor Voice 1]

Return to Pandora on Disney plus.

[Josh Dawsey]

It will be an adventure for the

[Sponsor Voice 1]

whole family and watch the Oscar winning phenomenon at home.

[Dana Mattioli]

This is sick.

[Sponsor Voice 1]

Avatar, Fire and Ash now streaming on Disney Plus. Rated PG 13.