Loading summary
Jessica Mendoza
Today is August 1st, a day that's been looming over trade negotiations for weeks. It's the day that President Trump said was the final, final deadline for countries to strike trade deals with the U.S.
Greg IP
So August 1st is just days away.
Jessica Mendoza
30% tariffs beginning August 1st. President Trump moments ago says the August.
Unnamed Contributor
1St deadline stand strong and will not be extended.
Jessica Mendoza
In his words, the Aug. 1 deadline can be boiled down to make a trade deal with the United States or get hit with steep tariffs.
Unnamed Contributor
The deals all start on August 1st. We've taken in, you know, hundreds of billions of dollars.
Jessica Mendoza
The administration said it would strike 90 deals in 90 days. That didn't happen. But Trump has cut deals with a number of countries over the past few weeks, with some agreements coming down to the wire. Washington has secured trade deals with both Thailand and Cambodia. President Trump announcing a trade deal with the United states and the U.K. trump.
Greg IP
Is touting his trade agreement with Japan as one of the largest in history for a trade deal with the European Union.
Unnamed Contributor
A new deal has been announced with.
Greg IP
One major trading partner, that is South Korea.
Jessica Mendoza
As for those countries that didn't make a deal, last night, Trump signed an executive order that set a 15% baseline tariff for many of those trading partners. Those tariffs go into effect next week.
Greg IP
As of today, Trump has arrived at tariffs on all US Trading partners.
Jessica Mendoza
My colleague Greg IP is the Wall Street Journal's chief economics commentator.
Greg IP
Some of those were arrived at deals or handshake deals, and some were simply imposed by Trump. And then there's a couple that are somewhere in between, like China, which is kind of in this gray zone where negotiations are ongoing.
Jessica Mendoza
Greg says that even though there are still a lot of details to be ironed out, Trump has managed to impose the most significant tariffs from the US in about a century.
Greg IP
He has raised tariffs more than the Smoot Hawley Tariff act in 1930. Now, almost every school student can tell you that that Smoot Hawley Tariff act was a bad thing, and it's associated with the Great Depression. But one of the reasons it's got such a bad reputation is that was followed by a trade war. Everybody else raised their tariffs, too. That hasn't happened yet. So Trump effectively raised tariffs by more than the Smoot Hawley Tariff act did, but without the trade war so far that followed that, that is a very remarkable achievement. Historians are going to be writing about that one for a long time.
Jessica Mendoza
Welcome to the Journal, our show about money, business and power. I'm Jessica mendoza. It's Friday, August 1st. Coming up on the show, Trump's Tariff dead is here. So now what?
Pitney Bowes Advertiser
Growing your e commerce business comes with plenty of hurdles, but shipping shouldn't be one of them. Well, here's some good news. Powerful e commerce shipping software called Ship Excel from Pitney Bowes. With Ship Excel, you can generate discounted shipping labels for both online and and offline orders. That saves time and money. With everything right at your fingertips, start your free trial of Ship Excel from Pitney Bowes today.
State Farm Advertiser
This episode is brought to you by State Farm. Checking off the boxes on your to do list is a great feeling. And when it comes to checking off coverage, a State Farm agent can help you choose an option that's right for you. Whether you prefer talking in person, on the phone or using the award winning app, it's nice knowing you have help finding coverage that best fits your needs. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.
Jessica Mendoza
President Trump has for a long time believed that the United States has gotten the short end of the stick when it comes to global trade. Here he is on Larry King Live way back in 1987, the fact is.
Unnamed Contributor
That you don't have free trade. We think of it as free trade, but you right now don't have free trade. And I think a lot of people are tired of watching other countries ripping off the United States. This is a great country.
Greg IP
He doesn't really buy the idea that most economists accept, which is that trade is win, win is that when you buy something from another country, you're both benefiting, your consumers benefit, their producers benefit and vice versa. When we sell something to that country, he just doesn't accept that argument. He thinks that when the United States buys something from another country, it is, quote, losing, unquote. And so the very large trade deficit the United States has had he sees as a sign of profound economic American weakness. And he has long felt other countries should pay for the privilege of selling to the United States, or for that matter, being defended by the American military.
Jessica Mendoza
And in his second term, Trump moved on tariffs quickly and aggressively. He imposed heavy tariffs on countries around the World on April 2, calling it liberation Day. But the stock market tanked in response and Trump pulled back those tariffs.
Greg IP
A week later, there was a very negative reaction in the markets. He paused all those and said that he was going to think about it and negotiate deals with these countries and move the deadline for those tariffs back to early July. When early July rolled around, there still were not a lot of deals. So he said, I'm moving the deadline to August 1st. Between early July and today, he's managed to bring about some of those deals.
Jessica Mendoza
Over the course of the summer, the US struck deals with Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, and the uk. US officials have also said that they've secured agreements with Cambodia, Thailand, and Pakistan. Some of the most significant agreements came together just in the past week. And there were three of the U.S. s biggest trading partners, the European Union, Japan, and South Koreawhich all agreed to a 15% baseline tariff. When Trump took office in January, the average tariff on the US's trading partners was 2%. The EU, Japan, and South Korea also agreed to each invest hundreds of billions of dollars into the United States in the coming years. And what are these trading partners getting out of these deals?
Greg IP
Nothing.
Jessica Mendoza
So why would they agree to this?
Greg IP
Because it could have been worse. Like in the case of the European Union. First of all, the United States is a very big market for them, right? They sell a lot of agriculture, a lot of manufactured products, a lot of everything. Right? They're the United States single largest trading partner, and actually they're a big buyer of American stuff as well. And so an obvious question was, well, since they obviously have some leverage with the United States, why didn't they use it? They talked about retaliating. They drew up a list of things that they were willing to impose tariffs on, and they never did it. Why didn't they do it? Well, there were two reasons. One is that the European economy has not been very strong for some years now, and so they really aren't well suited to fighting a long drawn out trade war with the United States. Secondly, they don't especially want to pay higher prices for imports from the United States. And then there's a final reason that has nothing to do with economics. Russia invaded Ukraine, and that whole period since then, Europe has become much more worried about its security. And right now, Western Europe is in a security alliance with the United States. NATO. Right. And through NATO, they've been supporting Ukraine's effort to, like, hold back the Russians. Trump, as you know, has been somewhat ambivalent about supporting Ukraine and supporting NATO. And the Europeans had a real fear that if they retaliated and this became a trade war, that Trump would back away from supporting Ukraine and maybe back away from NATO altogether. And that was a risk they could not take.
Jessica Mendoza
What's been the reaction to this deal in Europe and the eu?
Greg IP
It's been very negative. The Europeans hate it. There's a lot of anger at the European Commission for having given up so much. You know, even some of the populists, you know, like Marine Le Pen in France, have said that it was a sellout, it was immoral. But there's also an awareness that there wasn't much great alternative for them. You know, Trump definitely knows the meaning of leverage, and his initial assessment was absolutely correct. Every country needs the US More than the US Individually needs that country. And there's something called the madman theory of diplomacy, which is that if you can, if you can convince the other side that, that you're willing to go much deeper into the conflict than they are, then they're going to not push you on it. And there was a genuine fear or awareness that any country that stood up to Trump would just get an even worse treatment afterwards.
Jessica Mendoza
It's like a really high stakes game of chicken.
Greg IP
It's exactly that. But once again, this is how Trump's worldview operates. He doesn't see trade as something where you enter into a negotiation and come up with something that both sides win from. For him, it's one side wins and the other side loses.
Jessica Mendoza
But there is at least one country that has held out and it's a big one, China. That's after the break.
Unnamed Contributor
Wouldn't it be great to manage your portfolio on one platform? Well, now you can trade all in one place on Robinhood. That means you can trade individual stocks and ETFs, and also buy and sell crypto using seriously powerful and intuitive tools at one of the lowest costs on average, without needing to manage multiple apps. Robinhood makes withdrawing and depositing crypto seamless. Send crypto to your Robinhood account or send crypto from your Robinhood account to other wallets without deposit or withdrawal fees from Robinhood. Trade all in one place. Get started now on Robinhood Trading. Crypto involves significant risk. Crypto trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto llc. Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services. Crypto held through Robinhood Crypto is not FDIC insured or SIPC. Protected network fees may apply to crypto transfers. Crypto transfers may not be available to all customers. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Securities trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Financial LLC member SIPC, a registered broker dealer.
WhatsApp Advertiser
On WhatsApp, no one can see or hear your personal messages. Whether it's a voice call message or sending a password to WhatsApp, it's all just this. So whether you're sharing the streaming password in the family chat or trading those late night voice messages that could basically become a podcast, your personal messages stay between you, your friends and your family. No one else, not even us. WhatsApp message privately with everyone.
Jessica Mendoza
While President Trump was able to achieve many of his tariff goals by today's deadline, he still faces obstacles. Mexico and Canada, the two countries the U.S. trades with the most, have yet to cut a trade deal from Mexico. Trump said on social media that he'd agreed to extend the existing 25% tariffs on some Mexican goods for another 90 days.
Greg IP
And with respect to Canada, he's imposed a 35% tariff, but that only covers goods that are not Subject to the U.S. mexico, Canada trade Agreement, and that is a minority of trade between the United States and Canada.
Jessica Mendoza
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a statement that he was disappointed by the tariffs, but he will continue to negotiate with the United States. And then there's China.
Unnamed Contributor
We've been having massive deficits with China. Biden allowed it to get out of hand. He's $1.1 trillion deficit is ridiculous. And it's just an unfair relationship. And we have to make it just fair.
Jessica Mendoza
We don't have to make it. Although Trump hit China with tariffs of at least 145% earlier this year, he eventually pulled that back. And there have been ongoing negotiations with China for months, with China getting concessions out of the administration.
Greg IP
Not only did Trump dial back his tariffs on China, but he actually lifted some of the export controls on key technology to China. He even denied the president of Taiwan the ability to stop over in the United States, handing China a very important diplomatic victory.
Jessica Mendoza
How is China able to get those.
Greg IP
Concessions, as it turns out, despite the fact that China's not really an ally of the United States, if anything, it's an adversary. It also happens to be the one country that has both a lot of leverage with the United States and a willingness to use that leverage. What did that leverage consist of? Well, first of all, they buy a lot of stuff from the United States, like farm products. And second of all, they sell a lot of stuff that the United States actually needs, like rare earth metals, which go into things like electronics and renewable energy and batteries and so forth. Also, China doesn't, obviously, as a military adversary of the United States, doesn't have to worry about losing the US Security guarantees, right, the way, say, Europe or South Korea do. Right. And so the United States and China more or less arrived at a truce, you know, a pause on tariffs. They don't have what we call a deal. And they had another conversation a few days ago in Stockholm to talk about going further. So Trump has imposed, for example, for now, a 30% tariff on China, which is high, but he's actually imposed tariffs that are almost as high on countries that the United States does not consider adversaries the way it does China. So China has come out of this perhaps better than you might have expected.
Jessica Mendoza
Trade talks between the US And China will continue until the truce is set to expire in mid August.
Greg IP
So it looks like we've arrived at what Trump probably considers to be his endpoint on the vast majority of tariffs, with a little bit of cleanup left to do with respect to Canada, Mexico, and China.
Jessica Mendoza
Trump's unilateral approach to trade and tariffs bucks decades of precedent.
Greg IP
Historically, the United States negotiated trade deals with other countries. They sat down for very long discussions. They went over tariff schedules, thousands and thousands of items, line by line. This process would take months, sometimes years, and then the two sides would sign a pact, a treaty, and then often that treaty would be sent to the Senate for ratification. That is not the model that Trump follows. Trump doesn't negotiate anything. He simply announces the tariff and imposes it.
Jessica Mendoza
That strategy has raised a big question. Is imposing tariffs by executive order even legal? Already, the administration is facing several lawsuits challenging Trump's basis for implementing these tariffs.
Greg IP
So Trump used a law called the International Emergency Economic Powers act to impose these tariffs, and he used it in order to impose very high tariffs, with no timeline, no consultation, and at whatever level he chose. And the plaintiffs in these cases, some of whom are companies, have had to pay the tariffs, argue that that law doesn't give him that permission. The word tariff is never used in that law. He's invoking an emergency, calling the trade deficit an emergency, and they're pointing out, well, the trade deficit's been around for 50 years. What kind of emergency lasts 50, 50 years? Right.
Jessica Mendoza
One case went to the U.S. court of International Trade, which agreed with the plaintiffs, saying Trump's use of the act was illegal. Now the case is front of an appeals court, which heard arguments from Trump administration lawyers this week. The case could go all the way to the Supreme Court. I know we're still watching the courts, but other than that, would you say the trade war is over?
Greg IP
I'm not sure the trade war ever began other than China and a little bit of Canada, and nobody fought back. So it's not really a war if only one side is threatening. Right.
Jessica Mendoza
Trade conquest.
Greg IP
I don't know. It's like unilateral surrender.
Jessica Mendoza
Yeah. So I guess it sounds like Trump.
Greg IP
Won to him on the metric of success that Trump himself uses, which is the US Gets to Impose higher tariffs than they get to impose on the United States. Yes, the United States. But once again, that's Trump's definition of success. It is not necessarily the be all and end all definition of success. That is a story that has not yet been written.
Jessica Mendoza
But while it's still early days, there have been some signs of ripple effects on the economy.
Greg IP
We know that prices are starting to rise in some categories. We've also seen probably some impact on the broad economy. We now know that employment in the last two or three months was extremely weak, and that might have reflected the hit, the confidence of employers as they dealt with all the uncertainty and turmoil caused by Trump's trade war.
Jessica Mendoza
Today, US Stock indexes dipped following Trump's new tariffs. European and Asian stocks also fell, and the dollar sank. Do you think there's a chance that Trump pulls back on even some of these tariffs like he did back in April?
Greg IP
I would say right now, Trump feels he's probably in a good place with all the tariffs and doesn't feel any great pressure to pull back on tariffs. With three countries that remain, Mexico, Canada, and China, there might be some dialing back of existing tariffs, but I think everywhere else, he more or less has what he wants. A 15% baseline tariff, a few exceptions here and there, such as for aircraft, and higher tariffs coming down the road for specific products such as semiconductors.
Jessica Mendoza
How big of a shift are these trade deals to the global economy? How would you characterize it?
Greg IP
It'll take many years before we know what it really means for the global economy. The glue that held the global economy together for the past 60 or 70 years was mutual benefit. The idea that negotiation yielded arrangements, rules, agreements where both sides were both invested in the outcome. Now, if we're going into a world where that's not true any longer and essentially the biggest person gets to set the rules, then it seems likely that there will be less trade, you know, there will be less trust.
Jessica Mendoza
And how big of a story is this at this moment?
Greg IP
Well, on today, August 1st, it's a pretty big story, but this is a very fast news cycle. So there's a couple of things going on right now. Right. So we have the, you know, imposition of tariffs, which feels like the end of the beginning, but not the beginning of the end. But we also now know that the job market is starting to show a lot of weaknesses. So there's something going on in the economy as well that, you know, we'll have to be paying attention to. So today we're talking about terrorists, but tomorrow could be something different.
Jessica Mendoza
That's all for today. Friday, August 1st. Additional reporting in this episode by Caitlin McKay. The Journal is a co production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. The show is made by Kathryn Brewer, Pia Ghidkari, Carlos Garcia, Rachel Humphries, Sophie Codner, Ryan Knudson, Matt Kwong, Colin McNulty, Annie Minoff, Laura Morris, Enrique Perez de la Rosa, Sarah Platt, Allen Rodriguez Espinosa, Heather Rogers, Pierce Singhy, Jeevika Verma, Lisa Wang, Katherine Whelan, Tatiana Zamis, and me, Jessica Mendoza. Our engineers are Griffin Tanner, Nathan Singapok and Peter Leonard. Our theme music is by so Wiley. Additional music this week from Katherine Anderson, Peter Leonard, Billy Libby, Emma Munger, Griffin Tanner, Audio Network, Blue Dot Sessions and extreme music Fact checking this week by Jennifer Goren and Najwa Jamal. Thanks for listening. See you on Monday.
The Journal: Is Trump Winning His Trade War?
Episode Release Date: August 1, 2025
Hosted by: The Wall Street Journal & Spotify Studios
Hosts: Ryan Knutson and Jessica Mendoza
Produced by: Spotify and The Wall Street Journal
On August 1st, a pivotal moment in President Donald Trump's trade strategy loomed large. President Trump declared this date as the "final, final deadline" for nations to negotiate trade deals with the United States or face significant tariffs.
Jessica Mendoza [00:05]: "Today is August 1st, a day that's been looming over trade negotiations for weeks."
Trump's administration enforced a 30% tariff on countries failing to secure trade deals by the deadline. This move was a cornerstone of his aggressive trade policy aimed at reducing the U.S. trade deficit.
Jessica Mendoza [00:24]: "The Aug. 1 deadline can be boiled down to make a trade deal with the United States or get hit with steep tariffs."
Greg Ip, The Wall Street Journal's chief economics commentator, highlighted the unprecedented nature of these tariffs.
Greg Ip [02:00]: "He has raised tariffs more than the Smoot Hawley Tariff Act in 1930... Historians are going to be writing about that one for a long time."
Despite the administration's initial goal of securing 90 deals in 90 days, the reality fell short. However, significant agreements were achieved with several major economies:
Greg Ip [01:02]: "Is touting his trade agreement with Japan as one of the largest in history for a trade deal with the European Union."
Additionally, agreements were reached with Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Pakistan, marking substantial progress in the summer trade negotiations.
Jessica Mendoza [05:38]: "Over the course of the summer, the US struck deals with Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, and the UK."
The European Union, Japan, and South Korea agreed to a 15% baseline tariff, a notable escalation from the previous average U.S. tariff of 2% on these nations. In return, these partners committed to investing hundreds of billions of dollars into the U.S. economy over the coming years.
Greg Ip [06:24]: "Because it could have been worse... Russia invaded Ukraine... and that whole period since then, Europe has become much more worried about its security."
Despite significant progress, formidable challenges remained with Mexico, Canada, and China:
Mexico: No new trade deal was reached. President Trump extended existing 25% tariffs on certain Mexican goods for an additional 90 days.
Jessica Mendoza [10:45]: "Mexico and Canada, the two countries the U.S. trades with the most, have yet to cut a trade deal from Mexico."
Canada: Imposed a 35% tariff on goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement, affecting a minority of bilateral trade.
Greg Ip [11:06]: "He's imposed a 35% tariff, but that only covers goods that are not Subject to the U.S. Mexico, Canada Trade Agreement."
China: Despite aggressive tariffs totaling at least 145% earlier in the year, China remains uncooperative. Negotiations have led to a temporary truce, but underlying tensions persist.
Greg Ip [12:00]: "They don't have what we call a deal. They don't have what we call a deal. They had another conversation a few days ago in Stockholm to talk about going further."
China, recognized as a significant adversary, leveraged its economic clout by:
These factors enabled China to negotiate concessions despite the strained relationship.
Greg Ip [12:18]: "China has come out of this perhaps better than you might have expected."
Trump's unilateral tariff imposition faced legal scrutiny, particularly regarding the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Critics argue that the trade deficit does not constitute an "emergency" justifying such measures.
Greg Ip [14:21]: "He invoked an emergency, calling the trade deficit an emergency, and they're pointing out, well, the trade deficit's been around for 50 years. What kind of emergency lasts 50, 50 years?"
One significant case reached the U.S. Court of International Trade, which ruled against Trump's use of the act. The case is now pending an appeals court decision, with potential escalation to the Supreme Court.
The imposition of tariffs has begun to ripple through the economy:
Greg Ip [16:10]: "We've seen probably some impact on the broad economy. We now know that employment in the last two or three months was extremely weak."
While President Trump considers his approach victorious—imposing higher tariffs without triggering a counter-offensive—questions remain about the long-term sustainability and legality of this strategy.
Greg Ip [15:45]: "Trump won on the metric of success that Trump himself uses, which is the US Gets to Impose higher tariffs than they get to impose on the United States."
However, the broader economic and geopolitical repercussions are yet to fully materialize. The shift from mutually beneficial trade negotiations to unilateral tariff impositions signals a potential decline in global trade trust and cooperation.
Greg Ip [17:26]: "The glue that held the global economy together for the past 60 or 70 years was mutual benefit... Now, if we're going into a world where that's not true any longer and essentially the biggest person gets to set the rules, then it seems likely that there will be less trade, you know, there will be less trust."
As the situation evolves, especially with ongoing negotiations with China set to conclude around mid-August, the full impact of Trump's trade war strategy remains to be seen.
Additional reporting by Caitlin McKay. Produced by Kathryn Brewer, Pia Ghidkari, Carlos Garcia, and the rest of The Journal team.