The Global Scramble for Patriot Missiles

Summary

---

Podcast Summary: The Global Scramble for Patriot Missiles

Podcast: The Journal.
Date: March 11, 2026
Hosts: Ryan Knudsen
Guest Reporter: Bojan Panchevsky

---

Episode Overview

This episode confronts a mounting global crisis: the world’s desperate scramble for U.S.-made Patriot missiles amidst simultaneous wars in Iran and Ukraine. Knudsen and Panchevsky explore how America and its allies are firing interceptor missiles faster than they can be replaced, threatening defenses not only in active war zones, but also global security guarantees. As adversaries move to exploit U.S. manufacturing limitations, the episode delves into the new economics of modern warfare and questions America’s vaunted defense prowess.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. Disappearing Missile Stockpiles: The Newest Battlefield Scarcity

• Urgency of Supply: Since the war in Iran started, U.S. and allied missile defense systems (notably the Patriot) are being depleted at an unsustainable rate.
• Iran’s “Attrition” Strategy: “Can they outlast us?” (00:29, Bojan Panchevsky). Iran appears to be banking on outlasting U.S. and allied missile supplies, firing constant barrages to exhaust interceptors.

2. The War in Ukraine—Stalemate Below, Destruction Above

• Stalemate on the Ground, Air War Ongoing (04:21): Fighting in Ukraine is a “stalemate” with minimal changes to front lines, but Russia bombards Ukraine daily with drones and missiles targeting key civilian infrastructure.
• Air Defense Dependency: “It’s practically impossible for Ukraine to defend itself... unless they have enough Patriot missiles.” (06:26, Panchevsky)

3. Production Bottlenecks and Economic Paradoxes

• Supply Not Matching Demand: Even as U.S. allies place massive orders, U.S. companies like Raytheon (launchers) and Lockheed Martin (missiles) can't keep up.
  • Germany ordered 8 new Patriots (~€2 billion each) without estimated delivery; Lockheed Martin only produced 600 advanced Patriots last year (~50/month), but Ukraine alone needs at least 60/month. (06:55)
• Government Contracts Hold the Key: “If there’s no prospect of long-term contracts, these companies don’t tend to invest into expanding their production.” (07:52, Panchevsky)
• Not Pure Capitalism: The military-industrial sector is a “kind of small boutique, very sophisticated manufacturing,” making rapid scaling nearly impossible. (08:48, Panchevsky)

4. Ripple Effects: Iran War Diverts Defenses from Ukraine and Beyond

• US and Israel Seek to Destroy Iran’s Launch Capability: With Iran consuming over 800 Patriots in hours, “there will be nowhere near enough for Ukraine.” (10:35, Panchevsky quoting Zelensky)
• Consequences for Ukraine: “It’s a very, very difficult situation… there’s no clarity as to how they’ll resolve that.” (11:39, Panchevsky)

5. U.S. Adversaries Exploit the Crunch

• Adversary Calculations: China is “using their satellites to observe every Patriot system… counting the missiles fired.” (14:07, Panchevsky)
  • “It’s a numbers game—if you mass produce these weapons... you will eventually prevail.” (14:53, Panchevsky)
• Russia and Iran Have Kept Up Production: Despite sanctions, both are fully focused, militarizing their industries and cooperating (Russian mass production of Iran-developed drones).

6. U.S. Strategic Dilemma: Production Lag and Over-Specialization

• Diverted Defenses: U.S. took air defenses from the Pacific (meant to deter China/North Korea) to the Gulf, highlighting global vulnerabilities.
• Offense as Defense: “The best defense is a good offense.” (16:44, Defense Sec. Pete Hegsef), i.e., targeting “the archer instead of the arrows.”
• Limits of Sophistication: U.S. military might is unrivaled but has “feet of clay”—unsustainable in a prolonged war with a peer adversary.

7. What Needs to Change?

• Revamp Military Production: Policymakers must drive new contracts and competition, “create an ecosystem that… keeps churning out innovative and cheaper products.” (17:42, Panchevsky)
• Era of Asymmetric Warfare: Components (“chips and whatever else”) needed to make weapons are globally available—any actor can produce basic munitions, compounding the U.S. challenge.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• Bojan Panchevsky (00:29): “Can they outlast us?”
• Ryan Knudsen (01:17): “It’s not an issue of money, it’s an issue of manufacturing.”
• Bojan Panchevsky (06:26): “It’s practically impossible for Ukraine to defend itself from [ballistic missiles] unless they have enough Patriot missiles.”
• Bojan Panchevsky (07:52): “If there’s no sort of prospect of long-term contracts, these companies don’t tend to invest into expanding their production.”
• Bojan Panchevsky (08:48): “It’s an interesting kind of paradox... the military-industrial complex is this kind of small boutique, very sophisticated manufacturing.”
• Volodymyr Zelensky (as quoted by Panchevsky, 10:35): “These Patriot missiles are a matter of life and death for Ukraine.”
• Ryan Knudsen (11:57): “U.S. adversaries like Iran, Russia and China are seeing a huge opportunity in America’s production backlogs.”
• Bojan Panchevsky (14:07): “The Chinese are using their satellites to observe every Patriot system... they know how many can be made and how many are being expended.”
• Bojan Panchevsky (14:53): “If you mass produce these weapons and you fire 10 rockets for the enemy’s one... you are eventually going to prevail.”
• Defense Secretary Pete Hegsef (16:44): “The best defense is a good offense... Think of it as shooting the archer instead of the arrows.”
• Ryan Knudsen (18:49): “It’s almost too sophisticated in some cases for its own good.”
• Bojan Panchevsky (19:08): “The military might of the United States is completely unrivaled... But it’s also a kind of giant with a feet of clay.”

---

Important Timestamps

• 00:05–01:39 – Introduction and laying out the urgent missile depletion problem
• 04:15–06:26 – Ukraine’s stalemate and reliance on Patriot systems
• 06:55–08:48 – Production shortages and why government contracts, not demand, drive output
• 10:35–11:57 – Ukraine’s alarm as Iran depletes global stocks, Zelensky’s televised warnings
• 13:56–15:23 – U.S. adversaries watch and exploit U.S. production lags; the “numbers game” of munitions
• 16:44–17:01 – U.S. pivots to offensive operations, targeting missile launchers
• 17:42–19:08 – Discussion on necessary policy changes and limitations of U.S. military industry

---

Conclusion

This episode paints a stark, nuanced picture: U.S. and allied warfighting machines are not limitless. The bottleneck in missile interceptor production is now a vulnerability being watched and exploited by global adversaries, as Ukraine and others risk being left dangerously exposed. The conversation calls into question the sustainability of U.S. military power amid new kinds of asymmetric, industrialized warfare—where manufacturing prowess may be as decisive as battlefield innovation.

---

Transcript

[Ryan Knudsen]

Since the war in Iran started, the US has been running into an urgent problem. America and its allies are firing defense weapons faster than they can make them. Specifically interceptor missiles that shoot down incoming airstrikes. The depletion is pretty rapid, how long it can last and I think this

[Bojan Panchevsky]

is part of Iran's strategy, which is

[Ryan Knudsen]

can they outlast us?

[Tremphya Advertisement Voice]

You can't replace them overnight.

[Bojan Panchevsky]

You're not probably going to even be

[Tremphya Advertisement Voice]

able to replace them this year.

[Ryan Knudsen]

The US and Israel are trying to wipe out Iran's missile capacity before they

[Bojan Panchevsky]

run out of missile interceptors.

[Ryan Knudsen]

Our colleague Bojan Panchevsky has been looking into the issue.

[Bojan Panchevsky]

There are only so many so called interceptor missiles that you can buy on the market. And Arab allies of the United States found themselves burning through their stockpiles very quickly because the barrages coming in from Iran were extremely intense.

[Ryan Knudsen]

In the first few days of the war, the US and its allies fired hundreds of missile interceptors to repel Iranian attacks. That's led to a burn rate that's threatening to exhaust supplies.

[Bojan Panchevsky]

Problem is it's not an issue of money, it's an issue of manufacturing. America is just not in the position to manufacture enough of these crucial missiles. That's kind of mind bogg. It's a question of basically is the new economy of war. And I think the US is lagging behind.

[Ryan Knudsen]

The Department of Defense has said the US does have enough weapons to achieve its goals in Iran. But the Persian Gulf isn't the only place that relies on these missiles. In fact, they're needed all over the world, especially in Ukraine.

[Bojan Panchevsky]

For Ukraine, that means that they will probably not have the enough air defenses this year if this war in Iran continues. So that's, you know, if you do the math, that's. It looks pretty bad for them now.

[Ryan Knudsen]

Welcome to the Journal, our show about money, business and power. I'm Ryan knudsen. It's Wednesday, March 11th. Coming up on the show, the U.S. munitions shortage and what it means for Iran, Ukraine and the rest of the world.

[Intuit Advertisement Voice]

This episode of the Journal is presented by Intuit Enterprise Suite. If your finance team spends more time finding data than using it. If there's one entity here and one here and one here and one here. If scaling your business feels like starting over, you need the Intuit ERP. Intuit Enterprise Suite. The AI native ERP is here from the makers of QuickBooks. Learn more at intuit.com ERP

[Tremphya Advertisement Voice]

for adults with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis symptoms, every choice matters. Tremphya offers self injection or intravenous infusion from the start. Tremphya is administered as injections under the skin or infusions through a vein every four weeks, followed by injections under the skin every four or eight weeks. If your doctor decides that you can self inject Tremphya, proper training is required. Tremphya is a prescription medicine used to treat adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Serious allergic reactions and increased risk of infections and liver problems may occur. Before treatment, your doctor should check you for infections and tuberculosis. Tell your doctor if you have an infection, flu like symptoms or if you need a vaccine. Explore what's possible. Ask your doctor about tremphya today. Call 1-800-526-7736 to learn more or visit tremphyaradio.com.

[Ryan Knudsen]

Before the war in Iran began, what was the state of the war between Russia and Ukraine?

[Bojan Panchevsky]

Basically, the war in Ukraine has been reduced to a stalemate, the like of which we'd seen in the First World War. The front line is frozen, so to speak. It's changed extremely little in the past two to three years since the front

[Ryan Knudsen]

lines on the ground are frozen. The skies above Ukraine have become the most important battlefield in the war.

[Bojan Panchevsky]

Russia has been producing huge amounts of attack drones and missiles, and this is the biggest problem for Ukraine. They're being bombarded pretty much every day, day in, day out. And the targets of this bombardment are not necessarily military targets, but they are essentially critical nodes of the infrastructure that keeps the country running, heating electricity, gas, oil and stuff like that, which are extremely important for the civilian population.

[Ryan Knudsen]

To defend against these attacks, Ukraine has relied on a highly specialized weapons system manufactured in the United States. It's called the Patriot interceptor system. The Patriot system was developed over half a century ago during the Cold War,

[Bojan Panchevsky]

and essentially it's able to detect an incoming rocket very early, to engage it with its radar system, and then it fires missiles towards it that shoot it down and prevent it from destroying its target. The Patriot system essentially fires missiles into incoming missiles. Experts describe this process as hitting a bullet with a bullet.

[Ryan Knudsen]

The interceptor system, which includes the radar, the launcher, and the computers, is made by a defense company called Raytheon. The actual Patriot missiles are made by Lockheed Martin. Both are U.S. companies. In Ukraine, Patriot missile interceptors form the backbone of the country's defenses. Throughout the war, Russia has been firing barrages of drones and ballistic missiles. According to Ukrainian and Western intelligence, Russia can manufacture around 80 ballistic missiles every month.

[Bojan Panchevsky]

Ballistic Missiles are the biggest and most dangerous menace coming out of Russia. These are rockets essentially that fly high up in the atmosphere of the Earth and then fall down at many times the speed of sound. And they're extremely difficult to intercept and they're extremely damaging when they hit a target. So it's practically impossible for Ukraine to defend itself from them unless they have enough Patriot missiles.

[Ryan Knudsen]

Over the past year, Ukraine has become desperate for more Patriot interceptor systems. And its allies in Europe have been buying more from the US on its behalf. But the American companies that make these systems aren't making enough. In 2024, Germany ordered eight new Patriot systems for about 2 billion euros apiece. Systems it plans to transfer to Ukraine. But German officials say they haven't gotten them yet and they have no idea when they'll arrive. As for the missiles themselves, last year Lockheed Martin produced around 600 of its most advanced Patriot missiles. That works out to about 50 missiles a month. Ukraine says it needs around 60 missiles per month to keep up with Russia. So even if every new missile went to Ukraine, it still wouldn't be enough. What is causing these delays? Why aren't Raytheon and Lockheed Martin producing more if there's so much more demand?

[Bojan Panchevsky]

Trouble is, the United States have not been commissioning these companies to produce enough of these missiles. And the military industrial complex in the United States works in a way that it's kind of reliant on government contracts, basically thrives on taxpayer money. And if there's no sort of prospect of long term contracts, these companies don't tend to invest into expanding their production. And if the government doesn't order stuff, no matter how many other orders they get from other countries, and they do get tons of orders at the moment, ever since the war started in Ukraine, they're not going to move until they get this kind of long term, secure, safe contract.

[Ryan Knudsen]

But wouldn't for these companies though, I mean, even though they are government contracts, wouldn't these companies see that there's a lot more demand and so therefore we should invest in our ability to make more? I mean, isn't this just capitalism?

[Bojan Panchevsky]

Well, you would have thought that would work like that, but apparently it doesn't in this particular case. It's an interesting kind of paradox. It's a bit of a conundrum because the military industrial complex in a way is this kind of small boutique, very sophisticated like manufacturing where, you know, it's difficult to increase production.

[Ryan Knudsen]

Production of a single Patriot missile can cost millions of dollars and take months. They're made by hand with components that come from all over the US and from as far as Spain.

[Bojan Panchevsky]

And Lockheed told us that they are working hard to overcome these issues, that they have already expanded production manifold, which is true. They are now at 600 a year, as we said, just over 600. And they were making a lot less than that two, three years ago.

[Ryan Knudsen]

Lockheed Martin says it's working to boost production of its patriot interceptors to 2,000 a year by the end of 2030. For Ukraine, though, time is ticking. Raytheon's parent company, RTX, didn't return a request for comment about the missile launchers. Last week, President Trump met with the CEOs of Lockheed Martin, RTX and other defense industry leaders at the White House. After the meeting, Trump posted on social media that the companies had agreed to quadruple production. The situation in Ukraine was already dire, and that was before the war with Iran started.

[Indeed Advertisement Voice]

President Trump says the US And Israel have launched major combat operations. Donald Trump says the objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime.

[Ryan Knudsen]

How did leaders in Ukraine react to the outbreak of war in Iran and what that might mean for its defense systems?

[Bojan Panchevsky]

Well, I mean, the president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, held a cabinet meeting which was televised and issued a statement there saying that these Patriot missiles are a matter of life and death for Ukraine and they are absolutely concerned that they might not be receiving enough of them. So he very explicitly said what was going on. Then a day later, Zelensky said that the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Saudi had fired over north of 800 Patriot missiles in the first hours of the war. And he claimed that this is more than Ukraine had been able to procure since the start of the Russian invasion. The expectation is that the US Administration will help its Gulf allies who are obviously damaged and depleted by this conflict in Iran. It will be a scramble for everyone to get some and there will be nowhere near enough for Ukraine.

[Ryan Knudsen]

How would you describe the situation Ukraine finds itself in right now?

[Bojan Panchevsky]

Well, they're in a very difficult position there, in a pickle. The problem is the product is not there on the market. So it's a very, very difficult situation for them to confront because they will be facing a huge existential challenge and there's no clarity as to how will they resolve that.

[Ryan Knudsen]

Meanwhile, US Adversaries like Iran, Russia and China are seeing a huge opportunity in America's production backlogs. That's.

[Indeed Advertisement Voice]

This episode is brought to you by. Indeed, hiring isn't just about finding someone willing to take the job. It's about finding someone with the right skills and background who can move your business forward. And a good way to start your search is with Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It's one of the best ways to make your job post stand out and reach the candidates you're looking for faster. According to Indeed data, sponsored jobs posted directly on indeed are 90% more likely to report a hire than non sponsored jobs. Plus, there's no monthly subscriptions or long term contracts. You're only paying for results. Find the candidates who check all your boxes faster with Indeed Sponsored Jobs. Listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to help get your job the premium status it deserves@ Indeed.com that's Indeed.com journal right now and support the show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com journal terms and conditions Applying Hiring do it the right way with Indeed.

[Alexa Advertisement Voice]

This episode is brought to you by Alexa. Say hello to Alexa and see how Alexa can do more for you. Need tickets to that last minute show? Craving your favorite restaurant? Sit back, relax and talk Naturally, Alexa's on it. Alexa learns your preferences to create a personalized experience and now Alexa is free with prime on your Amazon devices like echo and Fire TV. Learn more at Amazon.com Alexaplus.

[Ryan Knudsen]

According to intelligence and defense officials, some U.S. adversaries are keeping a close eye on the Patriot interceptor missiles being used in the Persian Gulf. Like China, for example,

[Bojan Panchevsky]

the Chinese are using their satellites to observe every Patriot system in the area, and they're counting the missiles that are being fired. And it's a very simple math. You know, they know how many can be made and they know how many are being expended. So that when they do the math, they know the actual capacity of the United States to defend itself and its allies. And that's not a great thing if you want to deter someone like Russia or China.

[Ryan Knudsen]

According to Boyan's reporting, U.S. adversaries have long understood that America isn't producing enough Patriot missiles to replace its supply, and they've been looking for ways to exploit it. For instance, if they can produce more attack weapons more cheaply, then they can theoretically outlast US Made defenses and eventually overtake them.

[Bojan Panchevsky]

It turns out if you make a missile which is fairly precise and very, very fast and has a strong warhead, then you're laughing. You know the effect is the same. And if you mass produce these weapons and you fire 10 rockets for the enemy's one rocket, then you will eventually prevail. It doesn't matter how sophisticated the opponent is if your unsophisticated weapons, which do the job, are available in sufficient quantities, then you are eventually going to prevail.

[Ryan Knudsen]

It's a numbers game, and Bojan says this is exactly what Russia and Iran are doing.

[Bojan Panchevsky]

So basically, they're changing their doctrines to adapt to that reality of the kind of industrial decline, if you will, in the States.

[Ryan Knudsen]

Are Russia and Iran facing the same kind of munition shortages?

[Bojan Panchevsky]

Though it's interesting. Russia and Iran, despite the sanctions, despite the pressure, the military pressure they've had, they've been able to keep up industrial kind of production of weapons of all kinds because they are basically militarized details and their society's energies focused on strengthening the military.

[Ryan Knudsen]

Russia and Iran have also started making weapons together. In 2023, the two countries entered a tech transfer deal that allows Russia to mass produce drones that were first developed in Iran. To counteract Iran's attacks, the US has been forced to divert air defenses from around the Pacific to the Persian Gulf, air defenses that had been set up to deter potential attacks from China and North Korea. The US has also sought other ways to counteract the munitions disadvantage, for instance, by trying to take out Iran's ability to fire any missiles at all. Here's Defense Secretary Pete Hegsef in a press conference last week.

[Defense Secretary Pete Hegsef]

I mean, the best defense is a good offense. And so we're aggressively pushing into that airspace over that southern flank to ensure that we control it and we destroy anything that moves that would attempt to shoot us. Think of it as shooting the archer instead of the arrows. That's where we want to be in

[Ryan Knudsen]

the war against Iran. That means the US And Israel are racing to destroy Iran's missile stockpiles and its launch capabilities. But as for Ukraine, while the US And Europe have supplied it with defensive weapons, they haven't supported Ukraine's offensive capabilities out of concern that it could escalate the conflict even further. So now Ukraine is in a situation where it's running out of defensive weapons without having neutralized the Russian threat. Even if the US Goes after the archers, so to speak, and limits Iran's ability to shoot at the US and its allies, that still doesn't solve the core manufacturing issues that we've been talking about, though. So what can the US do about that?

[Bojan Panchevsky]

Well, I think if policymakers wanted, they could, you know, learn lessons from what's happening now, and they could put some pressure on the companies to start mass producing. They could give them bigger government contracts. They could also try to instigate a little more competition on that market. You know, the government will just need to decide how to instigate competition in that domain of the economy, you know, in military manufacturing and innovation, and how to create an ecosystem that actually works, that kind of keeps churning out innovative and cheaper products. We are in this era of asymmetric warfare where chips and whatever other elements required to produce a weapon like that are readily available everywhere in the world, so small state actors and even non state actors are going to be able to produce them. So, so I think that would have to instigate a massive change in the way America is thinking its defense and offense.

[Ryan Knudsen]

There's this narrative out there, I think, certainly in the US and much of the world, that the United States has the biggest and most powerful and sophisticated military in the world and that its capabilities are limitless. And yet for all of its sophistication, it's almost too sophisticated in some cases for its own good.

[Bojan Panchevsky]

That is absolutely true that the military might of the United States is completely unrivaled and unprecedented. But it's also a kind of giant with a feet of clay in some ways, because when it gets bogged down into a prolonged conflict with a peer enemy or with an enemy that has at least similar capacities, then it becomes very difficult.

[Ryan Knudsen]

That's all for today. Wednesday, March 11 the Journal is a co production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. Additional reporting in this episode by Drew Henshaw. Thanks for listening. See you tomorrow.

[Alexa Advertisement Voice]

The Future of Everything is The Wall Street Journal's flagship live event, returning to New York City May 4th through 5th. Be there as CEOs, policymakers and innovators sit down with our journalists to answer the most pressing questions of the day. From finance, tech and economic policy to sports streaming and style, we're bringing together today's most compelling newsmakers for two days of conversations on what's ahead. Listeners of this podcast can access exclusive discounted rates by visiting WSJ.com future that's WSJ.com future.