Loading summary
Kate Linebaugh
Earlier this month on Fox News, President Donald Trump announced a new plan. We have a lot of law firms that we're going to be going after because they were very dishonest people. They were very, very dishonest. His plan is to go after big law firms. The president signed a memo suspending the.
Erin Mulvaney
Active security clearances of lawyers from a.
Kate Linebaugh
Firm called Covington and Bur. In this chapter of Donald Trump's promised retribution, he has signed an executive order against a law firm called Perkins Coie. President Trump issued another executive order purporting to punish yet another law firm, this one, Paul Weiss. President Donald Trump has signed an executive order targeting Chicago based law firm Jenner and Block. The White House says the law these executive orders could have massive detrimental consequences for some of the nation's biggest law firms. Here's our colleague Erin Mulvaney, who covers legal affairs.
Erin Mulvaney
It could just make you bleed clients pretty much right away, almost immediately.
Kate Linebaugh
And as these executive orders were coming out, what was the response from lawyers in those firms?
Erin Mulvaney
Shock and fear for sure. Within those firms. It was a pretty dramatic move that could really destroy these businesses. So law firms have a lot of reason to be afraid for their business if they are targeted with an order.
Kate Linebaugh
These law firms are now having to decide how to respond and none of the options are good. Welcome to the Journal, our show about money, business and power. I'm Kate LINEBAUGH. It's Wednesday, March 26th. Coming up on the show, Trump's attack on big law. This episode of the Journal is brought to you by HubSpot. It takes a lot to grow your business. You've got to attract audiences, score leads, manage all the channels. But with Breeze, HubSpot's new AI tools, it's never been easier to be a marketer and crush your goals fast. Which means pretty soon your company will have a lot to celebrate, like 110% more leads in just 12 months. Visit HubSpot.com marketers to learn more. Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying Big Wireless way too much. Please, for the love of everything good.
Ryan Reynolds
In this world, stop with Mint.
Kate Linebaugh
You can get premium wireless for just $15 a month. Of course, if you enjoy overpaying, no judgments.
Ryan Reynolds
But that's weird.
Kate Linebaugh
Okay, one judgment anyway. Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment.
Erin Mulvaney
Of $45 for 3 month plan equivalent to $15 per month required intro rate first 3 months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See full terms@mintmobile.com.
Kate Linebaugh
Trump is taking aim at some big law firms because of things that happened years ago, going all the way back to his first term.
Erin Mulvaney
It'S pretty fair to say it's a way to come after people that had brought legal challenges against him before or done research and opposition work for people that were his opponents in the past.
Kate Linebaugh
The first firm Trump went after provided some legal services around the investigation of Trump's role in. In the January 6 riot, one law.
Erin Mulvaney
Firm that provided pro bono legal services to the special counsel's office under Jack Smith's leadership was Covington and Burling.
Kate Linebaugh
Trump issued an executive order against Covington and Burling that suspended the firm's security clearances and placed its government contracts under review.
Erin Mulvaney
If a lawyer handles a case, say, for a government official, and there are sensitive materials involved in that investigation, in order to represent that client adequately, he or she would need some kind of security clearance and access to that material.
Kate Linebaugh
Trump said his order was in response to, quote, the weaponization of our system by law firms. Covington said it had a long history of representing clients facing government investigations that is, quote, consistent with the best traditions of the legal profession. About a week later, Trump issued another executive order against another prominent firm. Perkins Coie. The Washington law firm has, among many clients, represented Hillary Clinton and the DNC during the 2016 presidential race. This executive order went further than the first one. It limited the firm's access to federal buildings.
Erin Mulvaney
So many things are federal buildings. Obviously, if you can't go to a federal court to represent your client, it would make it pretty limiting to represent that client. And probably most significantly, it directed agencies to investigate any federal contracts that the firm or its clients have and remove them.
Kate Linebaugh
Why is that the most significant part of the order?
Erin Mulvaney
So many of the big companies that they represent have very lucrative federal contracts, and if they work with that firm, they will lose it.
Kate Linebaugh
So what you're saying is if their clients want to keep their federal contracts, they'd have to go to a different law firm. That seems like it would be a big deal for Perkins Coie.
Erin Mulvaney
It would be very meaningful to lose their clients. These law firms do make relationships with clients over a long period of time. So that's why it was pretty existential and could potentially destroy a firm. Losing their clients, that's kind of their main currency.
Kate Linebaugh
Perkins Coie decided to fight back. The firm said the order was a, quote, irrational abuse of power that shocks the conscience. The firm alleged the order was illegal in at least nine different ways, including violating a client's right to legal counsel.
Erin Mulvaney
So Perkins Coie took the case to court and immediately got an emergency injunction that blocked the order from taking effect.
Kate Linebaugh
Federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to temporarily halt some of the penalties it levied on a law firm linked to Democratic causes that are unpopular with the president. How has Trump responded to that suit?
Erin Mulvaney
They pushed back in court. I listened to the hearing, and since they have also called for the judge to be removed. The upshot of what the Justice Department lawyer was arguing is that the president should have the power to say who or what institution creates a national security risk and should have that discretion. That's the main legal argument that they have on their side.
Kate Linebaugh
Just days later, Trump signed a third executive order that would take his fight against big law in a different direction. This order was against a major law firm called Paul Weiss.
Erin Mulvaney
The law firm is one of the nation's top firms. It has 1200 lawyers. It has some of the biggest clients that you could think of on Wall Street. Goldman, Blackstone, Apollo. So they're often in the conversation of some of the biggest players in the legal industry.
Kate Linebaugh
And like the other firms Trump has gone after, Paul Weiss has done some work for people and organizations that oppose Trump.
Erin Mulvaney
Their chair, Brad Karp, is a pretty prominent Democratic donor and in the past, especially during Trump's last administration, did assist the ACLU with fighting some of Trump's policies, particularly the policy that separated children and their parents at the border.
Kate Linebaugh
Did Trump say anything in particular about why he was taking aim at Paul Weiss?
Erin Mulvaney
In the order, it cited some pro bono work that Paul Weiss did for the attorney general in Washington, D.C. when they provided some legal help against the January 6 rioters who were accused of storming the Capitol One and then mentioning an affiliation with a former partner there, Mark Pomerantz.
Kate Linebaugh
Pomeranz is someone who used to work at Paul Weiss. He was affiliated with the firm for about two decades. In 2021, Pomerantz worked at the Manhattan DA's office on an investigation that resulted in an indictment against the Trump Organization for alleged fraudulent business practices. The indictment eventually fell apart. Trump's executive action against Paul Weiss was basically identical to the one against Perkins Coie. And immediately it started to impact Paul Weiss's business. Other big law firms started to approach Paul Weiss's clients, hoping to poach them. At least one client decided to drop the firm.
Erin Mulvaney
Our reporting indicates that the other big firms did take advantage of some of this, the misfortunes of the other firms. And in fact, this client that we were just talking about, they went to another big firm, but they had to go somewhere. We've had had reporting that there was some circling around.
Kate Linebaugh
The sharks are gonna.
Erin Mulvaney
The sharks are circling.
Kate Linebaugh
What options did Paul Weiss have?
Erin Mulvaney
Paul Weiss had the option to sue to block the executive order, and then what they did was a little different than that. I would say A lot of people wouldn't have imagined the option they took was going to be possible after the break.
Kate Linebaugh
What Paul Weiss did and why it was so surprising.
Ryan Reynolds
This episode is brought to you by indeed. When your fridge stops working, you don't sit around waiting for all your food to spoil. You find a solution. So why wait to hire the people your company desperately needs? Use Indeed Sponsored Jobs to find great talent fast. It moves your job post at the top of the page so it's the first thing relevant candidates see when they start searching. And it truly does make a difference. Sponsored jobs receive 45% more applications than non sponsored jobs, according to Indeed Data. Plus, with Sponsored Jobs, there are no monthly subscriptions or long term contracts. You're only paying for results. There's no need to wait any longer. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed. Listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs. More visibility@ Indeed.com journal. That's Indeed.com journal right now. And support the show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com journal terms and conditions apply. Hiring Indeed is all you need.
Kate Linebaugh
Once Trump signed the executive order against Paul Weiss on Friday, March 14, it set off a scramble.
Erin Mulvaney
Already over the weekend, all the partners at Paul Weiss, we're hearing from clients talking to each other. What are we going to do? They hired a lawyer. They were preparing to sue. They were ready to take it to court to try to get an emergency order, an emergency ruling blocking the order from taking effect. The lawyer for Brad Karp, the chair of the firm, had another suggestion. To possibly talk to the President himself to talk to him about how to get rid of the order. Defuse the bomb, defuse the bomb. As a reporter on it, I was very surprised that they didn't sue that Monday first thing. Cuz like I said, this could be detrimental to a firm.
Kate Linebaugh
In the background, Brad Karp found a way to Trump. He tapped a powerful acquaintance, Robert Kraft, the owner of the New England Patriots. Kraft connected carp with the president and a meeting was set up.
Erin Mulvaney
They met in the Oval Office on Wednesday. They talked for three hours and by the end of the meeting a deal had been reached.
Kate Linebaugh
What was in the deal?
Erin Mulvaney
Paul Weiss agreed to several things, the first of which was to give $40 million to certain pro bono legal services that the president approves of. They include veterans, things that are against anti Semitism, and a few other things. They agreed to some sweeping language about merit based hiring practices, which I think, in Brad Karp's view, lined up with the requirements of federal civil rights laws.
Kate Linebaugh
The firm also agreed to not take clients based on any political ties or partisanship.
Erin Mulvaney
That's actually kind of a normal thing for firms to say. They're not necessarily trying to take clients because of a political ties. You know, that's the whole point. They're trying to be neutral anyway, so that was the agreement. And then Trump had a message on Truth Social on Thursday evening.
Kate Linebaugh
President Trump yesterday rescinded an executive order targeting prominent law firm Paul Weiss. How big of a deal is this, given that Perkins had gotten a temporary injunction and that people in the legal community thought Paul Weiss had a pretty good case?
Erin Mulvaney
I think it was pretty shocking because if Paul Weiss took this to court, they'd probably win. And I think in the legal community there's a sense of upholding what they call like the rule of law, just respecting that an executive wouldn't be able to take an action so sweeping to target a firm like that. And the capitulation of such a major powerful figure maybe rattled people even more in the legal industry that the president could have such power over the law firm. A lot of people in the legal industry were very upset by what happened.
Kate Linebaugh
What has Paul Weiss said about why they went this route of striking a deal instead of getting litigious?
Erin Mulvaney
Actually, Brad Karp did send a note over this weekend to his partnership explaining that the business was likely to be destroyed if the executive order were to stand, was happening very fast, that competitors were swooping in. And he also said it was easy to complain from the sidelines when you're not faced with this existential crisis of your business being destroyed by an executive order.
Kate Linebaugh
President Trump is pushing ahead. He said he's looking into executive orders against more law firms. Yesterday he signed one against the firm Jenner and Block. Jenner said the executive order was similar to the one that had already been declared unconstitutional by a federal court and said it would pursue, quote, all appropriate remedies. Are you seeing any other sort of changes in the industry among firms trying to get ahead of a conflict with Trump or dodge a conflict with Trump?
Erin Mulvaney
I think the silence and the chill that you're hearing from them is probably one answer. I should also say getting a deal is not necessarily doable either. It's not clear if there can be a meeting with every single firm that Paul Weiss got. So I think they also are trying to stay out of the way of Trump in many ways.
Kate Linebaugh
What are the implications of, like, all of this on the legal system?
Erin Mulvaney
I think that the implications are that if you are a lawyer, your job is to represent clients. Yes, you choose your clients, but there's always been kind of a layer of protection for unpopular clients. You know, people represent, people are accused of murder and things like that. Obviously, that's not what we're talking about here. But there's pretty sweeping understanding that the role of a lawyer in the legal system is to have a vigorous defense of their client. So if you go after a law firm for taking on a client, it hits at the root of what this industry is all about. Trump has, I think we're tracking, you know, more than 120 lawsuits against his administration currently. And so far, the courts have been one pretty significant check on what has happened so far in this administration. And in the past, the legal industry has felt at least big law, these big firms have felt very insulated from the political fray, from attacks by executive orders of the administration. And so this is a clear shift from that narrative.
Kate Linebaugh
That's all for today. Wednesday, March 26. The Journal is a co production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. Additional reporting in this episode by Josh Dawsey and Ryan Barber. Thanks for listening. See you tomorrow.
Podcast: The Journal
Hosts: Kate Linebaugh and Ryan Knutson
Release Date: March 26, 2025
Produced by: Spotify and The Wall Street Journal
In the episode titled "Trump's Attack on Big Law," hosts Kate Linebaugh and Ryan Knutson delve into President Donald Trump's unprecedented executive actions targeting some of the nation's most prominent law firms. This strategic move by Trump aims to punish firms perceived as adversarial, raising significant concerns about the intersection of politics, power, and the legal industry.
Initial Actions and Targets
President Trump initiated his campaign against big law by signing a memo that suspended the security clearances of lawyers from Covington & Burling, a firm that provided pro bono legal services during the investigation of Trump's involvement in the January 6 riot. Kate Linebaugh introduces this development:
Kate Linebaugh [00:05]: "Earlier this month on Fox News, President Donald Trump announced a new plan... His plan is to go after big law firms."
Following this, Trump issued executive orders against other major firms, including Perkins Coie and Paul Weiss, further escalating his stance against the legal establishments he views as dishonest or oppositional.
Trump on Covington & Burling:
Kate Linebaugh [04:01]: "Trump said his order was in response to, quote, the weaponization of our system by law firms."
Perkins Coie's Response:
Erin Mulvaney [05:12]: "They have very lucrative federal contracts, and if they work with that firm, they will lose it."
Shock and Fear Among Lawyers
The immediate reaction within the affected law firms was one of shock and fear. Erin Mulvaney highlights the gravity of Trump's actions:
Erin Mulvaney [01:04]: "It could just make you bleed clients pretty much right away, almost immediately."
Law firms faced an existential threat as Trump's orders jeopardized their federal contracts and ability to operate effectively within the legal landscape.
Perkins Coie swiftly contested Trump's executive order, labeling it an "irrational abuse of power" and alleging multiple legal violations, including infringing on clients' rights to legal counsel. The firm secured an emergency injunction to block the order, leading to a tense legal confrontation.
Kate Linebaugh [06:16]: "Perkins Coie decided to fight back. The firm said the order was a, quote, irrational abuse of power that shocks the conscience."
A Strategic Deal Instead of Litigation
In a surprising turn, Paul Weiss opted not to engage in a prolonged legal battle against Trump's order. Instead, the firm negotiated a settlement after a pivotal meeting facilitated by Robert Kraft, the owner of the New England Patriots.
Financial Commitment:
Paul Weiss agreed to donate $40 million to pro bono legal services approved by the president, including initiatives for veterans and combating anti-Semitism.
Hiring Practices:
The firm adopted sweeping language on merit-based hiring practices, aligning with federal civil rights laws.
Client Neutrality:
Paul Weiss committed to not taking clients based on political ties or partisanship, a standard stance aimed at maintaining neutrality.
Erin Mulvaney [12:59]: "Paul Weiss agreed to several things... including veterans, things that are against anti Semitism, and a few other things."
Following the agreement, President Trump rescinded the executive order against Paul Weiss, a move that was unexpected given the legal community's belief that Paul Weiss had a strong case.
Erin Mulvaney [13:59]: "President Trump yesterday rescinded an executive order targeting prominent law firm Paul Weiss."
Shifting Dynamics and Future Outlook
Trump's aggressive stance against big law firms signifies a departure from the traditional insulation these firms enjoyed from political pressures. Erin Mulvaney discusses the broader implications:
Erin Mulvaney [16:49]: "Trump has... more than 120 lawsuits against his administration currently. And so far, the courts have been one pretty significant check on what has happened so far in this administration."
The legal industry's response has been a mix of strategic silence and attempts to avoid direct conflicts with the administration. The targeting of law firms undermines the foundational principle of lawyers representing their clients vigorously, regardless of the clients' political affiliations or actions.
Erin Mulvaney [17:30]: "This hits at the root of what this industry is all about."
The episode underscores a troubling trend where legal professionals are facing unprecedented challenges that could reshape the landscape of legal advocacy and firm-client relationships.
Trump's orchestrated attacks on major law firms represent a significant shift in the interplay between politics and the legal system. While some firms like Perkins Coie have mounted legal defenses, others like Paul Weiss have chosen negotiation and settlement over litigation. This series of executive orders not only threatens the stability of these firms but also poses broader questions about the independence of the legal profession and the safeguarding of legal norms against political interference.
Kate Linebaugh and Erin Mulvaney's comprehensive coverage in this episode of The Journal highlights the urgency and complexity of these developments, offering listeners a deep dive into a story with far-reaching consequences for money, business, and power in the United States.
Notable Contributors:
Additional reporting by Josh Dawsey and Ryan Barber.