Podcast Summary: "What We're Watching for Tonight" – The Journal
Released on November 5, 2024, "What We're Watching for Tonight" is an insightful episode of "The Journal," a collaborative production by The Wall Street Journal and Gimlet, hosted by Jessica Mendoza with contributions from political veteran Ben Pershing. This episode delves into the intricacies of the 2024 election night, providing listeners with a comprehensive guide to understanding what to expect as results unfold.
1. Setting the Scene
The episode opens with Jessica Mendoza in the bustling Washington, D.C. newsroom of The Wall Street Journal on election day. Amidst reporters heading to polling stations, Jessica introduces Ben Pershing, the Journal's Politics Editor, highlighting the anticipation and strategic planning involved in covering such a pivotal event.
Quote:
"It's actually pretty quiet right now. Seems like a lot of folks are still out and about reporting, heading to polling stations, probably talking to voters." [00:05]
2. Overview of the 2024 Election
Ben Pershing sets the stage by emphasizing the unprecedented closeness of the 2024 presidential race. Unlike previous elections where outcomes become clearer as the night progresses, this election remains tightly contested across multiple battleground states.
Key Points:
-
Closest Race Ever: Ben notes that the 2024 race is possibly the closest in history, with no clear leader emerging as the night unfolds.
Quote:
"What makes this one special? Yes, it probably is the closest race we've ever covered." [03:55]
-
Battleground States: Seven states are identified as pivotal: Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and North Carolina.
Quote:
"We think seven. There's really seven states that are really close and could go either way." [04:17]
3. Close Races and Battleground States
The discussion delves into the dynamics of the seven battleground states, highlighting their significance in determining the election outcome.
Key Points:
-
Blue Wall vs. Sunbelt: Ben categorizes the states into "blue wall" (Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin) and "Sunbelt" (North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada), explaining the strategic advantages each side holds.
Quote:
"There's the blue wall states... and then there's what's kind of loosely called the Sunbelt." [04:32]
-
Swing Factors: The potential shift of voters in these states could tip the scales for either candidate, making them focal points of the night's analysis.
4. Key Counties to Watch
To gain early insights into voting patterns, Ben outlines specific counties that serve as indicators for broader demographic shifts. These counties are chosen based on their representative populations, including age, ethnicity, and socio-economic status.
Highlighted Counties:
-
Travis County, Texas ([08:36])
- Description: Home to Austin and the University of Texas, Travis County is a blue-leaning area with a significant young and educated population.
- Significance: A strong performance by Harris here could signal robust Democratic turnout in similar counties.
Quote:
"It's the kind of place we're going to look at to see what Democratic turnout looks like." [08:36]
-
Hernando County, Florida ([09:38])
- Description: Located on Florida's Gulf Coast, Hernando County has a large population of seniors (over 25% aged 65+).
- Significance: Traditionally a Republican stronghold, shifts here could indicate changes in older voter preferences.
Quote:
"It's the kind of place that might be indicative of how older voters are going." [09:38]
-
Macomb County, Michigan ([10:18])
- Description: A suburban and exurban county north of Detroit, Macomb has swung between Democratic and Republican support in recent elections.
- Significance: As a key blue wall state, performance here is crucial for Harris; strong Republican results could hinder her chances.
Quote:
"If she lost any of these three blue wall states, Michigan, Wisconsin, or Pennsylvania, it just makes her job much harder." [10:58]
5. House and Senate Races
Beyond the presidential race, the episode touches on the tight contests within the House and the relative stability in the Senate.
House of Representatives:
-
Narrow Majority: Republicans hold a slim majority but are defending numerous seats, especially in states like California and New York, where vote counting may be delayed.
Quote:
"Republicans ending up with a five seat majority. They could see Democrats ending up with a 5 seat majority or even a 10 seat majority." [05:52]
Senate:
-
Republican Edge: Due to the current map, Republicans are favored to maintain or slightly expand their majority by winning a few additional seats.
Quote:
"All Republicans need to do to capture the majority is win a couple seats and they've got it." [06:52]
6. Election Night Predictions and Coverage
Ben Pershing shares insights into what the Journal team will be monitoring throughout the night, including the strategic use of data from AP VoteCast to anticipate voting behaviors.
Key Points:
-
Data-Driven Analysis: The team utilizes AP VoteCast, which polls thousands in advance, to project voting patterns based on demographics and issue importance.
Quote:
"Even before calls, we can say, wow, look at the suburbs, look at how women turned out, look at how Latino men shifted to the Republicans." [14:53]
-
Patterns and Trends: By analyzing early results from selected counties, the team aims to identify broader trends that could predict the final outcome.
Quote:
"We're now gonna find out what actually happened." [15:35]
7. Potential Counting Delays
Addressing common concerns, Ben discusses the possible delays in vote counting, especially in states with historically contentious ballots and voting rules.
Key Points:
-
Pennsylvania Delays: Known for disputes over voting procedures, Pennsylvania is a likely candidate for extended vote counting, potentially delaying the final outcome until days after the election.
Quote:
"Pennsylvania is always a bet to hold up... I think they'll take till Saturday this time." [13:11]
-
Arizona and Wisconsin: These states also have histories of voting controversies, which could further prolong the determination of winners.
Quote:
"Arizona and Wisconsin... you count also have a lot of attention on both of those places as they count." [13:40]
-
Patience is Essential: Ben advises listeners to remain patient and avoid jumping to conclusions based on early results, as initial tallies may not fully represent the final vote distribution.
Quote:
"Patience and most importantly, not jumping to conclusions, that's something." [16:42]
8. Conclusion
As the episode wraps up, Jessica Mendoza and Ben Pershing emphasize the unpredictable nature of election night and the importance of comprehensive analysis over immediate reactions. Ben shares his cautious optimism about the timeline, hoping for clarity within a few days rather than prolonged uncertainty.
Final Thoughts:
-
Timeline Prediction: Ben anticipates that, unlike 2020, the 2024 results may be clear by Wednesday or Thursday, though he remains open to the possibility of delays.
Quote:
"I don't wanna get pinned down too much on one particular time... I could see it being Thursday." [14:24]
-
Media Responsibility: The Journal aims to provide accurate, data-driven coverage to help listeners navigate the complexities of election night without succumbing to misinformation or premature conclusions.
Overall, "What We're Watching for Tonight" offers a meticulous breakdown of the 2024 election landscape, equipping listeners with the knowledge and expectations needed to comprehend the unfolding political drama.