Podcast Summary: The Lawfare Podcast
Episode: Lawfare Daily: ‘War in the Smartphone Age,’ with Matthew Ford
Release Date: August 27, 2025
Host: Justin Sherman
Guest: Matthew Ford, Associate Professor at Swedish Defence University and author of War in the Smartphone Age
Overview: Main Theme & Purpose
This episode explores how smartphones and related digital technologies are fundamentally reshaping war—both in how conflicts are experienced and fought. Justin Sherman and Matthew Ford discuss themes from Ford's new book, “War in the Smartphone Age,” focusing on open-source intelligence (OSINT), participatory warfare, the evolution of battlefield technology, and the political and social implications of warfare in our digitally connected era.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Ford's Background & Path to the Topic
- Career Path: Ford’s journey spans management consulting, defense analysis for the UK Ministry of Defence, and academia, all of which converge on his interest in technological change and military innovation.
- Evolution of Focus: His research moved from analog innovation to the intersection of digital media and war, leading to his latest book—analyzing not just the representation of warfare, but how digital technologies directly shape its practice.
“More recently, the book I've just written, War in the Smartphone Age, is concerned with how these digital contexts are shaping not just the representation of war, but also the conduct of war, how wars are actually fought, not just how they are presented online.” (03:57, Ford)
2. The Proliferation and Mundanity of Smartphones
- Staggering Numbers: By 2023, 7.6 billion people had 3G coverage; by 2025, projections show 7.4 billion smartphones in circulation.
- Digital Saturation: Everyday life, especially in the Global North, is deeply tied to these devices—yet often unexamined due to their pervasiveness.
- Cultural & Regional Nuances: Differences exist between regions in smartphone adoption and platform use.
3. The “Collapsing Context” Phenomenon
- Algorithmic News Delivery: Social media feeds deliver news and images out of chronological and geographical context, distorting events and our understanding.
- Transparency vs. Mediation: While the abundance of digital data can create “battleground transparency,” everything seen is subject to algorithmic and editorial framing.
- Real Example: Ford recounts a video that traversed Russia, China, India, and finally to Twitter, showing the complex provenance behind viral war content.
“You really do need to reflect on the provenance, the sources, and how this information, these images, have been presented to you under what circumstances.” (24:32, Ford)
4. Drones and the Shaping of Modern Conflict (Russia–Ukraine War)
- Civilian Drones in Combat: Ukrainian civilians used commercial drones and WhatsApp to relay Russian troop positions, directly influencing artillery strikes—a first in participatory warfare.
- Mediated Participation: The public, journalists, and military alike watched and interpreted footage broadcast from drones, but were subject to selection bias (e.g., only successful strikes are shown).
- Layered Effects: The success of drones shaped not just battlefield outcomes but perceptions of weapon relevance and shifted international military policy.
5. Incentives and Newsroom Behaviors in the Smartphone Age
-
Algorithmic Pressures: The race to be first remains strong, pushing both social media influencers and newsrooms to publish quickly—sometimes at the expense of thorough verification.
-
Coverage Gaps: Conflicts in areas with less commercial or linguistic support (e.g., lesser-known African languages) struggle for moderation and coverage, meaning atrocities go undetected or unaddressed for weeks.
“If there's no money in it, these things will always go down and slip past the radar.” (29:15, Ford)
-
Information Overload: As Ford notes, even major fact-checking orgs can only scratch the surface of the disinformation present daily.
“They can only fact check 10 of the hundred thousand [bits of mis/disinfo] that they find every day.” (33:43, Ford)
6. Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) and Open Source Investigations
- Definition: OSINT is intelligence from publicly available information, collected and disseminated to meet specific intelligence needs.
- Democratization: OSINT levels the field—anyone with analytical skills and time can participate, from governments to hobbyists, and even non-state groups.
- Distinction: OSINT is actionable and tied to immediate needs (e.g., targeting in war), whereas open source investigations may serve slower, archival, or legal proceedings (e.g., war crimes documentation).
7. The Digital “Stack” – Foundational Infrastructure of 21st Century Wars
- What is the Stack?: The layered, civilian-led infrastructure (from sensors to cables to satellites) underpinning our digital lives and, increasingly, military conflict.
- Targets & Vulnerabilities: Modern warfare often seeks to control or disrupt the “stack”; as in the Hamas October 7 example, attackers both manipulate and exploit civilian and military networks for operational and propagandistic gain.
“The real battle space for the 21st century is over this digital stack, this set of infrastructures that are shaping what we come to know and understand, but also they are shaping what could be militarily of interest and what can be targeted.” (45:29, Ford)
8. The Evolving Role of Smartphones in the Military Kill Chain
- Definition: Military “kill chain” is the process of finding, fixing, finishing (neutralizing) enemies, then exploiting and analyzing the results—iteratively.
- Smartphones as Sensors: Ordinary people, via their devices and apps, have become active nodes in these networks (e.g., Ukrainians using apps to relay targeting info directly to armed forces).
- Participatory Warfare: The line between observer and combatant blurs—as civilians directly contribute to military operations digitally.
“The smartphone is an incredibly sophisticated device and sensor... you effectively become part of the sensor network in the kill chain.” (52:01, Ford)
9. Crowdsourcing, Crowdfunding, and Participatory Violence
- Case in Point: The “signmyrocket.com” phenomenon—where users purchase inscriptions on munitions, see them launched, and sometimes participate in real-time attack decisions.
- Wider Implications: This participatory model has been employed by various armed groups, from Ukraine to Islamic State to Somali militias, for funding and publicity.
“You might even get the chance to press the Enter button as to when the bomb gets dropped...while you're sitting at home... looking at your computer or on your smartphone.” (55:06, Ford)
10. How to Be a Better Consumer of War-Related Information
- Key Tips:
- Pause Before Sharing: Avoid hasty reposting; verify sources; context matters.
- Analyze the Image Provenance: Consider the device, platform, storyteller, and editing behind content.
- Seek Varied Interpretations: “List the different stories that are being told about a particular event and then think about how that relates to the source material itself.” (60:18, Ford)
- Understand Technologies and Tactics: Question overblown claims; realism helps separate fact from hype.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
On the Distorting Lens of Social Media
“Our social media feeds deliver posts to us in an order that is framed by a platform's algorithms. These posts do not necessarily arrive in temporal order, but drop out of context, helping us to link content together in ways that may or may not reflect the way events unfolded.” (12:52, Ford quoted by Sherman)
On the Illusion of Transparency
“The battlefield looks somewhat transparent to [the military]... The public aren't always cued in on what they're seeing, and people don't typically spend time to go and fact check the feeds that they've got.” (17:41, Ford)
On Incentives and Misinformation
“If you can crowdsource your open source investigation...then you might even be able to do something more accurately online than you can do in the mainstream media.” (33:07, Ford)
“Fact checking misinformation is like pushing water uphill. You just can't keep up given the amount of stuff that's going on online.” (33:57, Ford)
On Participatory Warfare
“Not just representation, that's you getting involved in the conduct of war.” (56:10, Ford)
“My anthropologist colleagues have seen that happen... it's just part and parcel of what it is to have connected devices and connected technology available being used in ways people in Silicon Valley might not have anticipated.” (57:57, Ford)
Timestamps for Important Segments
- Ford on Digital Stack and Infrastructures: 02:21, 45:16
- On Collapsing Context & Social Media Algorithms: 12:52, 14:01
- Ukrainian Civilians Using Drones: 20:41
- Selection Bias in Drone Footage: 23:58
- Pressures on Journalists & News Cycles: 25:41, 26:50
- Fact-Checking & Info Overload: 33:43
- OSINT Definition & Democratization: 36:27
- Differentiating OSINT & OS Investigations: 40:34
- Tech Stack and Hamas' Attack: 45:16
- Military Kill Chain Evolution: 50:38
- Participatory Warfare Examples: 54:50, 57:24
- Advice for Information Consumers: 59:06, 61:51
For Listeners
This episode is a vital primer on how digital technologies—especially the ordinary smartphone—are transforming the realities of war, the quality and veracity of information, and the question of who participates. Ford offers both a warning and a toolkit: be skeptical, be curious, and be aware that in the smartphone age, the boundaries between observer and participant, civilian and combatant, truth and narrative are increasingly blurred.