The Lord of Spirits Podcast — "Pantheon & Pandemonium II Q&A" (Jan 14, 2022)
Episode Overview
This episode of The Lord of Spirits features an all-call-in Q&A format, with hosts Fr. Andrew Stephen Damick and Fr. Stephen De Young answering listeners' most intriguing, challenging, and "wacky" questions about the seen and unseen world as understood in Orthodox Christian tradition. The conversation moves through topics including the historicity and use of language about the underworld, hierarchies among angels and demons, ancient religious practices, biblical exegesis, and the Christian response to modern cultural phenomena. The tone is thoughtful yet accessible, with humor and tangents adding levity to complex theological discussions.
Notable Quotes & Highlights
- "The modern world doesn't acknowledge, but is nevertheless haunted by spirits, angels, demons and saints..." – [00:15] (show intro)
- “We don’t know exactly the fate of anybody that we know until, you know, until the end comes—but we do live in hope for them.” – Fr. Andrew [139:12], regarding prayer for the departed
- "Christ’s victory...is not an invitation, it’s a proclamation—bad news for some." – Fr. Stephen [69:09], on Christ preaching to the spirits in prison
Key Questions & Discussion Points
1. Did Ancient Egyptians Worship Onions? [01:08–04:00]
- Discussion: Referencing St. John Chrysostom and Roman writers, the hosts discuss whether Egyptians literally worshipped onions.
- Insight: Onions were “a sacred plant...the concentric circles represented eternity and eternal life” and were used in burial practices (Fr. Stephen [03:30]).
- Notable Moment: Fr. Stephen jokes about film theory if calls run out.
2. St. Christopher and the Dog’s Head (Werewolves?) [05:16–08:26]
- Caller: Samuel, Virginia
- Question: Is the depiction of St. Christopher with a dog’s head related to werewolf legends?
- Discussion: The hosts cite "othering" in icons (giant, cannibal references), referencing Jonathan Pageau’s work as the locus classicus.
- Quote: “He was just really ugly…but I’m pretty sure it kind of goes beyond that.” – Fr. Andrew [06:20]
- Related Resource: Pageau’s article and forthcoming book "God’s Dog".
3. Seven-Headed Leviathan, Rome, and Revelation [08:26–10:50]
- Same Caller (Samuel)
- Question: Does the seven-headed Leviathan connect to the seven hills of Rome and the Book of Revelation?
- Answer: Direct connection—Rome is symbolically the embodiment of Leviathan, a spiritual being animating empires, not just individuals ([09:03–10:50]).
4. “Do You Love Me?” – Agape vs. Philia in St. John’s Gospel [11:05–22:44]
- Caller: Aiden, Colorado
- Topic: Is John using two different Greek words for “love” in a deliberate way? Many sermons distinguish agape (divine/unconditional) from philia (friendship).
- Answer: No evidence for a technical difference in John’s usage; the two words are used interchangeably in his Gospel, including for God’s love.
- Methodological Insight: Warns against “concordance” style Bible reading and stresses context and authorial usage over plugging in abstract word meanings ([13:33–21:48]).
- Memorable Analogy: The various uses of the word “green” [15:11–15:29].
- Quote: “A lot of times people make really good points on really bad bases.” – Fr. Stephen [19:46]
5. Hierarchy and Cooperation Among Demons [23:16–28:44]
- Caller: Gabriel, New York
- Question: Do demons have a hierarchy or collaborate, or are they just chaotic?
- Answers:
- Demons don’t have organized ranks like angels; their ‘order’ comes from participation in divine energies, which demons lack ([26:09]).
- Demons are “cosmic intelligences” and can play long cultural “games” to perpetuate evil.
- Quote: “Most of the things we’re calling demons were vast cosmic intelligences...capable of playing the long game.” – Fr. Stephen [27:00]
6. Is There Marriage in Heaven? “Two Become One Flesh” [29:16–39:39]
- Caller: Hayes, Louisiana
- Questions: Is marriage eternal? How does “one flesh” work spiritually?
- Discussion: The “purpose of marriage is to reveal your sins so that you can repent of them.” Marriage is for salvation and mutual repentance.
- Do Marriage Bonds End?: Christ’s answer to the Sadducees refutes the notion of possession, focusing instead on eternal love and devotion lasting into the “life of the world to come.”
- Quote: “Marriage, if that’s what we’re talking about...that’s going to become eternal...” – Fr. Stephen [37:43]
- Warnings against Gnostic ideas about sexless, disembodied eternity ([38:58]).
7. Have Cultures Faced Modern-Style Relativism Before? [43:10–61:33]
- Caller: Derek, Arkansas
- Question: The “my truth” era feels historically unique—has something similar happened? How do we explain to children?
- Discussion:
- History is full of “truth-imposing” empires (Assyrians, Romans).
- Christianity is always counter-cultural; Christians should never feel at home in the world ([50:04]).
- Everyone holds to some narrative; the challenge is storytelling—providing the true story of Christ among competing narratives ([54:00–61:30]).
- Quote: “Christians have really been in the same position all the way through Christian history.” – Fr. Stephen [49:54]
8. Who Are the “Spirits in Prison” in 1 Peter 3? Giants/Watchers/Human Souls? [63:01–70:02]
- Caller: Jeff, North Carolina
- Question: When Christ preaches to “spirits in prison,” who are they?
- Answer: Preaching = proclamation of victory, not an invitation. The “spirits” are the rebellious Genesis 6 angels (“watchers”), not human souls. The narrative parallels Enoch, where Enoch is told to proclaim their doom ([63:43–69:21]).
- Notable Quote: “The gospel is not good news for everyone; it’s bad news for some...” – Fr. Andrew [69:09]
9. What is the Glory of God? Kavod, Shekinah, Manifestation [70:19–79:39]
- Caller: Emilian, Romania
- Question: What is God’s “glory” (Kavod, Shekinah), and which person of the Trinity is manifested?
- Answer: “Glory” in Hebrew connotes both substance (kavod—weight, mass) and visible manifestation (shekinah—cloud). It’s not unique to one Person of the Trinity ([73:17–76:51]). In temple visions and worship, it is Christ who is seen liturgically present.
- Quote: “There is one glory of the divine nature in both senses.” – Fr. Stephen [76:48]
10. Aliens, UFOs, and the Orthodox Response (plus Sasquatch & Giants) [82:10–93:32]
- Caller: Brian, Texas
- UFOs: The Orthodox Church has no official teaching; if intelligent, communicable life exists, it would underscore the Christian universal claim of human nature ([90:22]).
- Sasquatch/Giants: Distinguishes cryptozoological and archetypal ‘giant’ motifs; bestialization (like Nebuchadnezzar) is possible and involves spiritual, not DNA, manipulation.
- Quote: “If an alien race showed up that had a consciousness with the same shape as human consciousness...that would mean human nature is a universal. And only Christianity has that as a base teaching.” – Fr. Stephen [90:40]
11. Why Does God Harden Pharaoh’s Heart? [94:54–107:22]
- Caller: Stace, Ireland
- Question: Does the hardening of Pharaoh’s heart override his free will?
- Answer: The Exodus text shifts passive, self-hardened, and God-hardened phrasing for a reason; God’s purpose wasn’t just liberating Israel, but “executing judgment against the gods of Egypt.” Pharaoh’s lack of repentance is clear; God “clouds his judgment” to allow full justice and demonstration of true divinity ([98:23–104:57]).
- Free Will: Ancient/biblical notion of will = moving according to nature, not arbitrary choice; “overriding” will is different from modern libertarian free will ([105:18–107:22]).
12. Does God’s Foreknowledge Override Free Will? [108:15–121:22]
- Caller: Steve, California
- Question: How can God “know” the future if time is only experienced by man?
- Answer: Human logical paradox arises from attempting to “see” God’s perspective, which is fundamentally inaccessible; God is outside time and present at every point, but divine knowing and willing are not analogous to our experience ([113:17–121:14]).
- Quote: “We can imagine, but we can’t actually see that. We can only know things as humans… That’s not how divine knowledge works.” – Fr. Stephen [113:17; 118:10]
13. What’s the Difference Between Hades, Sheol, and Hell? [121:41–133:03]
- Caller: Peter, California
- Answer: All three originated as words for the place of the dead and their ruling power (Greek, Germanic/Norse, Hebrew). The distinction between them is more about language evolution and context (e.g., how Dante/medieval images shaped “hell” in modern thought) than original usage ([122:49–128:53]). Post-Resurrection, the New Testament uses other imagery (e.g., “lake of fire”) for final condemnation/judgment ([129:23]).
- Advice: Clarify context and meaning in conversation—define your terms!
14. Can We Pray for the Salvation of Non-Believers Who Have Died? Do the Dead Communicate with Us? [133:16–145:56]
- Caller: Dina, California
- Personal Story: Asked about her father who died apparently non-believing, her dreams, and Orthodox practice.
- Answer: We cannot know the final state of anyone’s soul, and there can be unseen repentance even in seemingly unconscious hours. Orthodox prayer for the dead is real and effective because we share in each other's salvation.
- About Experiences: Manifestations from the dead are not always demonic; discern by the fruits (peace, love vs. fear/confusion). Many have real, non-demonic experiences of deceased loved ones ([145:51]).
- Quote: “God is very much capable of saving your father through your prayers and the prayers of your family.” – Fr. Stephen [144:30]
Additional Memorable Moments
- [04:09]: Fr. Stephen preps “Mick Foley-style cheap pops” and a Tom Hanks “Orthodox sighting” joke.
- [60:21]: Big Lebowski references: “But that’s just, like, your opinion, man.”
- [62:01]: Regional BBQ preferences used as a sign of theological orthodoxy.
Closing Thoughts
The hosts conclude by encouraging continued engagement via email and social media, noting the ongoing importance of participating in and shaping the Christian narrative against a background of modern confusion and competing worldviews.
This summary provides detailed insights and references to serve as both a resource for in-depth study and an engaging guide to the episode’s rich, wide-ranging discussions.
