
Welcome to Nerd Alert, a series of special episodes bridging the gap between marketing academia and practitioners. We're breaking down highly involved, complex research into plain language and takeaways any marketer can use. In this episode, Elena...
Loading summary
Rob Demars
Nerd Alert. Learning is important, right?
Alina Jasper
Yes, exactly. But a bunch of nerds.
Rob Demars
Nerd alert.
Alina Jasper
That's right. Marketing Architects. Hello and welcome to the Marketing Architects, a research first podcast dedicated to answering your toughest marketing questions. I'm Alina Jasper on the marketing team here at Marketing Architects, and I'm joined by my co host, Rob demars, the chief product architect of misfits and machines.
Rob Demars
Hi.
Alina Jasper
Hi. Is it. Did you delay just for fun or is there actually a delay?
Rob Demars
No, I actually looked at my notes really quick, and then I realized we're on like Donkey Kong. I'm sorry, it's reintroducing myself.
Alina Jasper
That's okay.
Rob Demars
All right. Sorry. Yes. Hello, Elena.
Alina Jasper
Hi. We're back with your weekly Nerd Alert. Every week, I'll take a deep dive into academic marketing research and translate its complex ideas into simple, understandable language for Rob, and of course, for all of you. Are you ready to nerd out, Rob?
Rob Demars
I am so hungry for a nerd Trisha snack.
Alina Jasper
Perfect. Let's get into it. As always, we'll link the research we cover in the episode notes. This week, I read a study titled the Dear Clay A Comprehensive Model of Buying Behavior by Goodheart, Ehrenberg and Chatfield. Now I want to give a disclaimer. I think I pronounced that right. Dear Clay. It's mentioned in how brands grow. This is a very famous study, and I found a lot of different pronunciations online. Supposedly, I don't know, that seems to be the right pronunciation. I tried to learn the German pronunciation. I tried, but I couldn't do it. So this study, it was published back in 1984, but it is still relevant today, and it underpins a lot of the research we share on this show. It really changed the way we think about branding loyalty and why consumers buy the way we do. Rob, this is a classic study. Byron Sharp, he loves this study. But before we get into it, let me ask you this. What is one product that you buy all the time from a variety of different brands?
Rob Demars
Almost without thinking, I'm going to go with gasoline. But what I mean by gasoline, I mean the gas station, right? Whatever is on the right side of the road here in America. For those of you, you know, listening internationally, which I know we have a ton of. Just kidding. On the right side of the road. If I see a Shell station, a Chevron holiday, that's where I'm turning.
Alina Jasper
Yeah.
Rob Demars
Unless they have really good snacks. Then I might wait, you know, and turn left if there's not a lot of oncoming traffic. But otherwise, I'm veering to the right.
Alina Jasper
Yeah. You're like my husband. If we go by is it at Casey's? He's like, I need breakfast pizza. There you go. Yeah.
Rob Demars
Then you go, but it's still not the brand. It might just be, you know, the brands within the brand that might be getting you correct.
Alina Jasper
Gas stations is a great example for me. Mine that came first to mine was pasta. Like, I'll just grab different. I just look for the shape. Not really brand loyal. It's like whatever I'm feeling.
Rob Demars
You're all about the spongebob Mac and cheese, right?
Alina Jasper
That is good.
Rob Demars
It holds the cheese really well.
Alina Jasper
It's. Yeah.
Rob Demars
You know, yeah.
Alina Jasper
Who doesn't love that?
Rob Demars
It's a good vehicle for cheese.
Alina Jasper
Exactly.
Rob Demars
That's spongebob.
Alina Jasper
Well, this research, it explains why most people like Rob and I don't actually have deep, unwavering brand loyalty. Instead, the deer clay finds that buying behavior is remarkably predictable, down to statistical probabilities. So here's what the study did. The researchers analyzed how often people buy certain brands across a wide range of fast moving consumer goods or FMCG categories in the UK and the US this includes things like toothpaste, coffee or instant soup. And they found that consumer behavior follows an eerily consistent pattern across nearly every product type. The big idea is that people buy from multiple brands in a category, and even the most loyal buyers still buy from competitors occasionally. But here's where it gets even more interesting. The model found that brand share predicts buying behavior with stunning accuracy. So if Your brand has 20% market share, about 20% of category buyers will have purchased it at least once over a set period. So that sounds obvious, right? But what it means is that if you want more buyers, you need more reach, not deeper loyalty from the same people. So marketers, we often try to increase brand loyalty, but this study suggests that loyalty is mostly a function of market share, not the other way around. We've talked about this before on the show. We've known it's true since 1984. But Rob, how accepted do you think this principle is among marketers today? That acquisition is what actually drives loyalty.
Rob Demars
Yeah, I definitely don't think that's an accepted principle. Everyone has a rewards program. Everybody's striving for that methodology. I do wonder sometimes if it depends upon the category too. If you look at like travel, loyalty plays a different game versus, you know, if you're a soda brand. And it can be a flip of the coin. Yeah. Acquisition does not drive loyalty because you can just get more users and double your amount of users just by getting those new users.
Alina Jasper
Let's talk about an even bigger takeaway from the study. You might think that there are a lot of light and heavy buyers for every brand. So people who buy once versus people who buy frequently. But the Dear Clay model shows that even this follows a predictable pattern. Most buyers are light buyers who only buy a brand once or twice a year. Very few are heavy buyers who purchase it constantly. And here's the kicker. Every brand, big or small, has roughly the same buyer distribution. This means that a small brand doesn't have these super loyalists keeping it afloat. It just has fewer total buyers. So to summarize, here are some of the big Loyalty is an illusion. Brand choice is mostly about availability and habit, not deep emotional commitment. The key to growth isn't squeezing more out of existing customers. It's getting more people to buy, even just once. And your competition isn't just the big brand in your space. It's every brand your buyers also buy from. Now for a robgpt, buying behavior is like streaming tv. Just because you watch Netflix a lot doesn't mean you won't also tune into Hulu, Disney plus or YouTube. Brands that expect exclusivity are missing the point. Your job is to get in the rotation.
Rob Demars
Elena, can you remind me, I'm putting you on the spot here about the quote from the research around Coca Cola and like if they were to just increase the amount of repurchased, like I can't remember, I'm butchering it, but you know what I'm talking about.
Alina Jasper
Yeah, it's something like 80 or 90% of their buyers buy Coke once a year.
Rob Demars
Right? That blows my mind. Absolutely blows my mind.
Alina Jasper
Yes.
Rob Demars
And I think that type of factoid that can really challenge this acquisition drives loyalty because you think Coke is such a, a loyalty driven brand. And yeah, that stat just was a total level set for me when I heard it.
Alina Jasper
Yeah, that's the crazy. The, the image I like the most to describe. This is the chart. Just imagine like you're looking at almost like a chart just going like straight down. And I don't describe this in, in audio. It's like a diagonal, a diagonal line that's starting on the left side of your chart high and then goes down to zero. And that is like how most brand buyer curves look like. You have a lot of light buyers buying you once a year is the biggest one and then twice and then those super loyal people are actually the smallest percentage. And that's why I think this study was so groundbreaking because before everyone Talked about the 8020 rule, the 80% of your sales are going to come from those 20% of buyers. But it's not true. Like most of Coca Cola's buyers. Think about all the billions of dollars they make are from people that are drinking Coke just once a year.
Rob Demars
And amazing.
Alina Jasper
It does hold across categories. I mean, that's what they found over time is like, I'm sure, sure it differs a little bit and it depends on your brand, blah, blah, blah. But most of the time, most of the time, this is a principle we can follow. The more you can reach, reach new people, reach light buyers, that's going to be a better way to grow. And then you've got to decide the best way to do that based on your brand and your budget, obviously. That's it for this episode of the Marketing Architects. We'd like to thank Taylor De Los Reyes for producing the show. You can connect with us on LinkedIn and if you like the podcast, please leave us a review. Now go forth and build great marketing.
Rob Demars
Sorry, I hope I didn't throw you off too much on my first answer. I sort of went off script a little bit of my own script, you.
Alina Jasper
Know, Rob, I don't even remember what.
Rob Demars
You said, so I don't either.
Alina Jasper
Marketing Architects.
Summary of "Nerd Alert: The Dirichlet Effect: Predicting Brand Loyalty"
Podcast: The Marketing Architects
Episode Title: Nerd Alert: The Dirichlet Effect: Predicting Brand Loyalty
Release Date: March 20, 2025
Hosts: Alina Jasper and Rob Demars
In this episode of The Marketing Architects, hosts Alina Jasper and Rob Demars delve into the intricacies of consumer buying behavior through the lens of a seminal study titled "A Comprehensive Model of Buying Behavior" by Goodheart, Ehrenberg, and Chatfield, published in 1984. The hosts aim to unravel how this foundational research continues to influence contemporary marketing strategies, particularly concerning brand loyalty and consumer acquisition.
Alina introduces the concept of the Dirichlet Effect, a term they coin to describe the predictable patterns in consumer buying behavior uncovered by the study. She humorously corrects the pronunciation of "Dirichlet," emphasizing the study's continued relevance despite its age.
Alina Jasper [02:25]: "This study, it was published back in 1984, but it is still relevant today, and it underpins a lot of the research we share on this show. It really changed the way we think about branding loyalty and why consumers buy the way we do."
The discussion centers around several pivotal findings from the study:
Predictable Buying Patterns:
The research analyzed purchasing behaviors across various fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) categories in the UK and the US, including toothpaste, coffee, and instant soup. It revealed that consumers exhibit remarkably consistent buying patterns across different product types.
Alina Jasper [03:30]: "Consumer behavior follows an eerily consistent pattern across nearly every product type."
Market Share as a Predictor:
One of the standout revelations is that a brand's market share is a direct predictor of its buying behavior. Specifically, if a brand holds a 20% market share, approximately 20% of category buyers will have purchased it at least once within a set period.
Alina Jasper [03:25]: "If your brand has 20% market share, about 20% of category buyers will have purchased it at least once over a set period."
The Myth of Deep Brand Loyalty:
Contrary to common marketing practices that prioritize building deep brand loyalty, the study suggests that loyalty is largely a function of market share. Even consumers perceived as "loyal" frequently purchase from competing brands.
Alina Jasper [04:00]: "Loyalty is mostly a function of market share, not the other way around."
Distribution of Buyers:
The study elucidates that most consumers are light buyers, purchasing a brand once or twice a year. Heavy buyers, who purchase frequently, constitute a negligible portion of the consumer base. This distribution is consistent across both large and small brands.
Alina Jasper [06:30]: "You have a lot of light buyers buying you once a year... super loyal people are actually the smallest percentage."
Rob and Alina explore the practical ramifications of these findings for today's marketing strategies:
Focus on Acquisition Over Retention:
Given that market share drives brand reach, marketers should prioritize expanding their customer base rather than solely attempting to deepen loyalty among existing customers.
Alina Jasper [04:20]: "If you want more buyers, you need more reach, not deeper loyalty from the same people."
Rethinking Loyalty Programs:
The hosts express skepticism about the efficacy of traditional loyalty programs, suggesting that in many categories, these initiatives may not significantly impact overall brand performance.
Rob Demars [04:30]: "Everyone has a rewards program. Everybody's striving for that methodology."
Universal Buyer Distribution:
The finding that buyer distribution is consistent across brands implies that even niche or emerging brands cannot rely on heavy buyers for sustainable growth. Instead, widespread reach remains crucial.
Alina Jasper [06:30]: "Most of Coca Cola's buyers... are drinking Coke just once a year."
A particularly striking example discussed is Coca-Cola's buyer distribution. Despite being perceived as a brand with high loyalty, the study reveals that 80-90% of its buyers purchase Coke only once a year.
Rob Demars [06:13]: "80 or 90% of their buyers buy Coke once a year."
This revelation challenges the conventional wisdom surrounding brand loyalty, highlighting the importance of reach over retention even for industry giants.
Alina describes a visual representation of the buyer distribution curve, emphasizing the steep decline from light to heavy buyers. This imagery reinforces the concept that the bulk of a brand's sales come from a broad base of infrequent purchasers rather than a small group of dedicated customers.
Alina Jasper [06:30]: "Imagine like you're looking at almost like a chart just going like straight down. ... the diagonal line... most of the time, this is a principle we can follow."
The episode culminates with a synthesis of the study's lessons:
Loyalty is an Illusion:
True brand loyalty is rare; most consumer interactions are superficial and driven by availability and habit rather than deep emotional connections.
Growth Through Reach:
Expanding market reach by attracting more buyers, even if they purchase infrequently, is more effective for growth than attempting to intensify loyalty among existing customers.
Competitive Landscape:
Marketers must recognize that competition extends beyond the primary brand contenders to include any alternative options that consumers might choose.
Alina Jasper [07:16]: "The more you can reach, reach new people, reach light buyers, that's going to be a better way to grow."
Rob reflects on the surprising nature of these findings, particularly regarding a brand like Coca-Cola, which is traditionally viewed as a loyalty-driven market leader.
Rob Demars [06:08]: "That blows my mind. ... When you think Coke is such a loyalty-driven brand."
Alina reiterates the universal applicability of these insights across various categories and underscores the enduring significance of the study in shaping effective marketing strategies.
Notable Quotes:
This episode of The Marketing Architects offers a compelling exploration of consumer buying behavior, challenging long-held beliefs about brand loyalty. By highlighting the predictive power of market share and the predominance of light buyers, Alina and Rob provide listeners with actionable insights to refine their marketing strategies. The enduring relevance of the Dear Clay model underscores the importance of focusing on expanding reach to drive growth in an increasingly competitive marketplace.