A (2:42)

Yeah, I think the key word there is underdog. I don't think people are rooting for the brand. That sucks. But they're definitely going, okay, hey, if you're the David in the big guy's Goliath, everyone wants David to win. And of course. So yeah, for sure, like when Avis we try harder, you kind of root for that versus the big yellow hurts. So, yeah, I do think as long as you're providing an underdog value, then people are going to root for an underdog brand.

B (3:09)

Right. That Avis ad is a great example. And sometimes brands really lean into that. Yeah, I'd say sometimes I feel that way. Like, you see an upstart, they're kind of challenging, like a big category leader, and you kind of want to buy from them. So this study looked at this and they actually ran four different studies to test when and why underdog brand stories resonate. So Study 1, it was a national online survey with 181 participants. They were introduced to a fictional company, a that was described as either an underdog, say they start in a garage, few resources, determined to overcome, or a top dog. Industry insiders, well funded and expected to succeed. Both were small companies in their market to keep the size constant, so the top dog wasn't necessarily bigger. After reading the stories, participants rated their purchase intentions across six categories. And the results show that people identified more strongly with the underdog company. And even purchase intentions rose. The effect was especially strong among participants who already considered themselves underdogs in life. And then study two asked a new question. Is it enough to just have disadvantages or. Or just have determination? And so they built this two by two test so they had a victim who was disadvantaged but not determined, a privileged achiever advantaged but determined, a top dog advantaged and unmotivated, and an underdog disadvantaged but determined. With 222 participants, they found the underdog narrative outperformed all others. Disadvantage alone wasn't inspiring and determination alone wasn't special. But when combined, the effect was powerful. Participants showed higher self brand connection and higher purchase intentions. Study three, they compared American and Singaporean students. Why'd they do this? Well, US Culture tends to celebrate this American dream, pulling yourself up by your bootstraps. But Singapore, on the other hand, emphasizes social order and hierarchy more than the United States. So they had 90Americans and 92 Singaporeans read either an underdog or a top dog brand biography. And both groups preferred underdogs. But the effect was much Stronger in the US Americans rated their brand connection 4.05 out of 7, compared to just 3.36 in Singapore. And Americans also showed a higher purchase intent. Then they had study four. The last one, they had over 200 students, and they had to choose between two actual chocolate brands, Scharffen Burger and Dagoba, which I had not heard of. Depending on one condition. One brand was for framed with an underdog biography, the other with a top dog one. About 71% of participants chose the underdog brand. But here's the kicker. When people were buying for themselves, the underdog effect spiked to 89%. If they had just been primed with underdog themed movie clips like Rocky or Rudy.

A (5:46)

Really, Adrienne.

B (5:50)

When buying for a friend, the effect dropped off. So, in other words, underdog stories are most persuasive when the purchase is tying to your own identity. Put simply, underdog stories matter most when identity is at stake or when this purchase kind of feels personal. Time for a RAO GPT. Underdog branding is like rooting for the small food truck at a country fair. It doesn't have the slick signage or the corporate budget of the big vendors, but you see the owners hustling and pouring their heart into every dish. People connect with that story. It feels real. It could feel like part of their own struggle. And when you bite it and it's good, you're hooked for life. All right, Rob, what'd you think?

A (6:24)

Wow. So good. You know, it's actually deeply personal to me right now because, as you know, I've always loved Apple, and Apple was known as the. You know, they would fly a flag over Cupertino because Steve Jobs would say, I'd rather be a pirate than in the Navy. And I feel like that is changing, that they are becoming the Navy, or they are the Navy, and all these other people are doing more interesting things than they are. I was just telling someone else the other day, like, there was one brand when I was back in the 90s, I would have gotten an Apple tattoo. If there was one brand, I would get a tattoo. I would have. I would have. I mean, just so passionate, and I've been so passionate with them for so long, but they are just losing their underdog story, and they're just becoming what Microsoft was. And Microsoft is actually becoming more interesting with their investments in AI. And that really resonates to me that you just. You want that challenger who's coming into the marketplace and shaking things up. I feel like ChatGPT OpenAI has really started to play that role against players like Google and Gemini, like they're coming in and making everyone else raise their game, and that's when consumers win. So I love that they were also queuing people up with narratives from movies. You can just see how, you know us, especially us Americans, we love that. We love that underdog story. Yeah.

B (7:57)

Yeah. I can almost see this working for any brand because they had that one study where the companies were the same size, so it's not like the underdog was significantly smaller.

A (8:05)

Yeah.

B (8:05)

And I wonder if any marketer could look at their brand. They must be an underdog in some way. And could you tap into that through a story, since people definitely. They love to root for one. Another thing I was thinking is it's interesting that it works a lot better when it's a purchase for yourself. So maybe when you're in a big gifting season, this type of message might not perform as well. If people are buying for others, they tend to not. Right. They don't resonate as much with an underdog story. So just interesting to think if you're the type of brand who has something that's usually bought personally versus gifted to someone else, this story might not work as well.

A (8:39)

Did I miss it? Did they say why that when you buy for someone else, that the underdog story doesn't work? I've just. I don't doubt it. I'm just curious what the rationale would be.

B (8:50)

Yeah, it just says that was that study where it was the last study. Study four. Yeah. I'd have to look into it more. So when they were buying for their friend, the effect dropped off a bit, so they connect it to, like, underdog stories are most persuasive when it's tied to your own identity. So it feels personal. But yeah, I'd have to look into that more.

A (9:07)

Maybe people perceive when they're giving a gift that you're just going to buy the premium big Dog in the category so that the person receiving it thinks it's a good thing versus, oh, you bought me the underdog brand. Like, maybe that's not as. Maybe perceived as good. I don't know.

B (9:26)

Yeah. Or you don't consider it as, like, personal of a purchase because it's not for you. That's it for this episode of the Marketing Architects. We'd like to thank Taylor de Los Reyes for producing the show. You can connect with us on LinkedIn. And if you like the podcast, please leave us a review. Now go forth and build great marketing Marketing Architects.