Donald Trump’s War on Culture Is Not a Sideshow

Summary

Podcast Summary: "Donald Trump's War on Culture Is Not a Sideshow"

The New Yorker Radio Hour
Host: David Remnick
Guest: Adam Gopnik
Date: August 29, 2025

---

Overview

This episode examines the depth and seriousness of Donald Trump’s renewed "culture war" in his second presidential term—not just concerning traditional political flashpoints (race, gender, sexuality, etc.) but as a concerted campaign against the arts, museums, universities, and pluralistic institutions. David Remnick and New Yorker staff writer Adam Gopnik analyze the meaning, consequences, and historical echoes of Trump’s interventions in American culture, stressing the foundational role of pluralist institutions in democracy and warning against creeping authoritarianism in the realm of cultural policy.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

---

1. Redefining the Culture War: The Politics of Art and Pluralism

• Remnick opens by noting that under Trump, the "culture war" now targets symphony boards, museums, and universities, not just social issues. Trump has removed leadership at iconic institutions (Kennedy Center, National Portrait Gallery, Library of Congress) and initiated ideological reviews of others ([00:43]-[01:54]).
• Gopnik argues Trumpism isn't pursuing a precise strategy so much as a response to feeling culturally wounded—by academics, museum curators, and mass media ([02:13]).
  • “There’s this enormous sense around the people he surrounds himself with that they have been wounded by American culture in some profound way.” — Adam Gopnik [02:13]
• The debate isn’t unique—there’s a tradition of conservative pushback against perceived elite dominance in culture, from William F. Buckley at Yale to Trump’s current moves ([03:29]-[03:44]).

---

2. Authentic Criticism vs. Authoritarian Threats

• Gopnik recognizes legitimate criticisms of excesses in progressive ideology or "pieties" in art institutions, including the sometimes dogmatic policing of cultural appropriation ([04:19]-[06:01]).
  • “The rhetoric of cultural appropriation as something inherently sinister I think is crazy...But there is a difference of night and day between the...tendency of intellectuals and artists to trope towards conformity and a declared state policy on the arts.” — Adam Gopnik [05:30]
• He draws a stark line between natural cultural debate and state-imposed ideology, warning that Trump’s actions echo authoritarian models from history ([06:08]-[06:21]).

---

3. Parallels to History: Soviet Union and Totalitarian Controls

• The conversation turns to direct comparisons with Stalin and the Soviet system, in which cultural control and censorship were routine and disastrous ([08:20]-[10:09]).
  • “That is the nature of an authoritarian society.” — Adam Gopnik, on the control of art in Stalin’s USSR [10:09]
• Gopnik notes Trump is far less of a "cultural consumer" than historical dictators, showing interest mainly in television and a limited set of cultural touchstones (like Les Misérables), but the pattern of demanding loyalty rather than excellence is similar ([10:13]-[11:47]).

---

4. Tactics of Purge and Loyalty

• Specific examples: Leadership purges at cultural institutions are framed not as reforms, but as demands for loyalty ([11:09]-[11:47]).
• Gopnik highlights how such moves, though seemingly “daily insults,” add up to a systematic attack on pluralism at the heart of democratic culture ([11:26]).

---

5. Extending Influence: The Ripple Effect and Self-Censorship

• Remnick questions the likely impact of these actions on less government-dependent institutions (movie studios, late-night TV) ([14:24]-[16:19]).
• Gopnik points to how new rationales are always offered for the sidelining of resistant figures like Stephen Colbert, but the effect mirrors “every authoritarian society” ([16:01]-[16:51]):
  • “Each time we find a rationale for it...and it’s much easier for us to swallow the rationale than defy the reality.” — Adam Gopnik [16:19]
• Discussion of Trump’s reaction to museum exhibitions on slavery, and his emphasis on a “cheerier view” of American history, links back to his political roots in birtherism and nativist messaging ([16:54]-[19:23]).

---

6. History Wars: 1776 vs. 1619

• The episode contrasts the 1619 Project’s critical examination of slavery in U.S. history with Trump’s 1776 Commission, which Gopnik labels “straightforward propaganda” ([19:23]).
  • “Straightforward propaganda has no authentic desire to explore the complicated...issues in a national history...We can be patriotic and recognize how much exploitation there was...You have to be emotionally stunted not to be able to say both things are true at once.” — Adam Gopnik [19:54]

---

7. The Role and Evolution of Museums

• Trump labels museums as the last “woke” bastion. Gopnik laughs off the personal charge—doubting Trump’s personal engagement—but concedes that inclusive and more diverse narratives in museums are real, necessary, and part of an ongoing intellectual process ([20:23]-[22:05]).

---

8. The Impact on Artists and Writers: Self-Censorship and Persuasion

• Remnick and Gopnik reflect on the threat of self-censorship under pressure, and the challenge for intellectuals—not just how to react, but how to reach audiences and avoid merely “preaching to the choir” ([22:56]-[24:25]).
  • “What you’re doing is you’re teaching the choir how to sing in tune...Here’s the language we should use...to remind people of what the right tone is.” — Adam Gopnik [23:52]
• Gopnik extols wit and humane irony as essential tools, referencing Albert Camus as a role model for speaking truth in dark times with lucidity and complexity rather than dogma ([24:55]-[25:53]).

---

9. Endurance, Social Media, and Generational Shifts

• Gopnik and Remnick note the fatigue and oppression felt by culture workers and citizens—but highlight the need for persistence and adaptation ([28:52]-[29:48]).
• Gopnik contrasts his own exhaustion with his daughter’s approach: embracing the new battleground of social media and digital activism. He quotes John Updike: “At any moment an old world is passing and a new world is coming into being. We have sharper eyes for the fall than the rise, because the old world is the one we know.” ([27:32]-[28:52])

---

10. Does It All Matter? Culture, Attention Spans, and Democratic Health

• Remnick queries whether diminished reading and communal cultural experiences have lessened the stakes ([29:48]-[30:14]).
• Gopnik is philosophical: arguments over medium are perennial, but “eliminating the possibility of a pluralist civilization is a kind of plague...almost impossible to recover from” ([30:59]).
  • “It’s our job not to persuade because we have limited power to do that, but to assert the value of pluralism over and over every week, if you like, and certainly always in our work.” — Adam Gopnik [30:59]

---

11. Dire Predictions and Historical Analogies

• Remnick presses Gopnik for predictions; Gopnik fears things could get worse, invoking the lesson of the 20th century: vigilance is required not just against right or left but against deals with authoritarianism on any side ([31:24]-[33:17]).
  • “We are in the process of inflicting a similarly primal wound on ourselves, if we do not remember the lesson that history teaches us, which is you have to be equally discerning and equally determined not to fall prey to that temptation.” — Adam Gopnik [33:09]

---

Notable Quotes

• “There’s all the difference in the world...between the processes of persuasion and argument that produce cultural debate...and the imposition of a cultural line.”
  — Adam Gopnik [07:29]

• “Everything is redefined on an axis in which there is only loyalty.”
  — Adam Gopnik, re: Trump’s purges of cultural boards [11:26]

• “You can see how effectively that happens. And it is typical of every authoritarian society.”
  — Adam Gopnik, on finding ‘rationales’ for the removal of dissenting entertainers [16:19]

• “Straightforward propaganda has no authentic desire to explore...issues in a national history, but simply wants to lay over familiar America First...fiction about American history.”
  — Adam Gopnik [19:27]

• “You have to be emotionally stunted not to be able to say both things are true at once.”
  — Adam Gopnik [19:54]

• “Our job...is not to persuade in the first instance...but to assert the value of pluralism over and over.”
  — Adam Gopnik [30:59]

---

Key Timestamps

| Time | Topic | |-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | 00:43-02:13 | Introduction to Trump’s broadened culture war, targeting arts institutions | | 02:13-03:44 | Adam Gopnik on Trump’s sense of being wounded by "elite" culture | | 04:19-06:08 | Progressive pieties and real differences between debate and state policy | | 08:20-10:09 | Soviet cultural control and Trump’s similarities/differences | | 11:09-11:47 | Examples of purges and why loyalty, not qualification, is now paramount | | 14:24-16:51 | Effects on media (e.g., Stephen Colbert), slippery justifications for attacks | | 16:54-20:23 | Museums, revision of history, and Trump’s view of slavery in American memory | | 22:56-24:55 | Writers’ and artists’ response: persuasion, wit, and resistance | | 27:32-28:52 | Social media as the new battlefield, generational response | | 29:48-30:59 | The importance of pluralistic civilization, despite changes in cultural consumption | | 31:24-33:17 | Dangers ahead, the Vichy analogy, and warning against authoritarian complacency |

---

Tone & Closing Reflections

The episode is rigorous yet personal, mixing analytical warnings with moments of rueful humor. Both Remnick and Gopnik stress the seriousness of cultural pluralism’s endangerment, but also encourage resilience, historical perspective, and ongoing assertion of liberal and pluralist values—even (or especially) in the face of fatigue. Gopnik concludes with a warning about making “deals with the devil” out of partisan fear, urging the audience not to repeat the mistakes of history.

---

Recommended for:

• Listeners concerned about the intersection of politics, culture, and democracy
• Anyone interested in historical analogies to contemporary US politics
• Those seeking clarity on why culture wars over art, museums, and history matter deeply

---

Transcript

[Narrator/Announcer]

WNYC Studios is supported by Liveright Publishers of the Martians, one of the New York Times most anticipated summer books. It's the true story of a strange era when Nikola Tesla, Alexander Graham Bell and other scientists believed that intelligent life had been found on Mars. Former NPR science correspondent David Barron vividly chronicles the craze that transformed society, launching science fiction and the space age itself. Publishers Weekly calls the Martians enthrallingly bizarre and surprisingly poignant. David Barron's the Martians available now. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, a co production of WNYC Studios and the New Yorker.

[David Remnick]

Welcome to the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. Usually when we talk about the culture wars, we mean issues of sexuality, race, religion and gender. But as recent months have made plain, when Donald Trump thinks about the culture wars, he also very distinctly means the arts. Trump has very definite tastes in what he likes to see and what repels him, too. At the start of his second presidency, Trump fired the board of the Kennedy center, and now the Republicans would like to rename the building for him. His administration pressured the director of the National Portrait Gallery to resign, and they fired the national archivist and the Librarian of Congress. His attorneys are reviewing the entire Smithsonian Institution looking for what the president calls improper ideology. Now, one reading of all this is that culture makes an easy target. It seems elite, and that all this is a deflection from the Epstein Noise and the Ukraine war and the tariffs and so much else. But my colleague Adam Gopnik believes this is a serious misreading. Adam writes widely for the New Yorker about culture and history and much else, and we spoke last week. What is the nature of this culture war in the second presidency? Not just the details, but what is it aimed at doing? What is it? What is it not?

[Adam Gopnik]

You know, I can't speak for Trump's intentions and often I think we make a mistake in overreading his intentionality and imagining that there's a scheme when there's simply a set of stimulus and responses that go on. I think that there's this enormous sense certainly around the people who he surrounds himself with that they have been wounded by American culture in some profound way.

[David Remnick]

That they've been lectured to by left leaning university presidents and teachers and museum curators and mass media and.

[Adam Gopnik]

Exactly. Adam Gopnik or whom, yeah, he's particularly annoying because he stands up there yelling, you can make a rational case that there is always something to be said for the populist re stimulation of American culture. It's part of the Jacksonian tradition. Of course, pluralism is the key principle of a democratic culture. We have no trouble in our lives appreciating the art of the Las Vegas Strip or the late Elvis and at the same time reading Tolstoy. Those are not activities that cancel each other out.

[David Remnick]

What he's attacking when I say he.

[Adam Gopnik]

I mean Trump and Trumpism.

[David Remnick]

What they're looking at, for example, is humanities departments in the main universities and a saying that's completely left. It's reminiscent of William F. Buckley at Yale many, many years ago.

[Adam Gopnik]

Many, many years ago, suggesting that it's a persistent theme, not a new, but with different themes.

[David Remnick]

Buckley was concerned with religion, Catholicism being pushed out and so on. Here the concerns have to do with. With air quotes, Wokeism. Their concerns have to do with the study of history, which is very familiar to me coming from having lived in falling Soviet Union. The importance of that. To what degree is there a point there? And to what degree is this a full blown culture war that scares the hell out of you.

[Adam Gopnik]

Much more the second than the first and at the same time because that's the obligation of the liberal imagination. Of course there's a point there. I've written at length over the years against progressive pieties as they take control of cultural institutions.

[David Remnick]

For example.

[Adam Gopnik]

Well, the whole idea of cultural appropriation I've always found absurd and have said that culture is in its nature art. Forget the word culture, which is an ugly word. Art and civilization are in their nature hybrid activities. The impression is pulled from the Japanese printmakers and then the Japanese printmakers learn from the impressionists. The story of the popular music you and I adore is a story of constant hybridization. Muddy Waters get sent out to the port of Liverpool and it comes back five years later as the Beatles and the Stones. That's healthy, essential. That's what civilization is. The constant hybridization of kinds. So the rhetoric of cultural appropriation is something inherently sinister I think is crazy. And to the degree that that's typical of one face of a particular kind of cultural. You should forgive the expression hegemony of a particular kind of cultural conformity. Of course there's something in that but, and this is the biggest but of our time, there is all the difference in the world. There's a difference of night and day between the unfortunate tendency of intellectuals and artists to trope towards conformity and a declared state policy on the arts. One the normal working out of a civilization of argument, of argument and persuasion and change and fashion and vogues and all of those things. That come and go. And the other is the model of the authoritarian control of art. That is, the state dictates an ideological line.

[David Remnick]

So we're now seven months into a second term. Adam, sketch out how you see what Trump is doing, his strategy, the details of it, and what it all might resemble from past experience abroad.

[Adam Gopnik]

The key thing is that democracy rests on lots of pedestals, but the two key ones, I think, are obviously free and fair elections and the rule of law somehow defined. And the other, just as important, is social coexistence. It's having a pluralist culture. It's people understanding that our tastes, our creed, our faith cannot trump, so to speak, all the others. So having pluralist cultural institutions is not the, you know, the windshield decor on a democracy. It's the foundation of a democracy. We should be able to say, and in the past, we have been able to say, you know, Tony Kushner's politics are well to the left of center, and David Mamet's politics are way to the right of center. At least they are now. But they are both, in an arguable sense, great playwrights who have changed the nature of American theater. And it should not be difficult for us to have a national stage in which both Kushner and Mamet make an appearance.

[David Remnick]

But are we heading toward a culture conf. A culture war in which the President of the United States says that Angels in America can't be at the Kennedy Center? Yes, yes.

[Adam Gopnik]

Angels in America, Hamilton, the most conservative work of musical theater ever written, that those things are inadmissible because they are woke or because they are lefty. Now, you know, I understand the counterargument, David. I do. To say, well, yes, but then where. You know, where the Ivy League institutions that are teaching Mark Halperin and David Mamet and even Tennessee Williams. Right. And that's not an empty argument. But again, there's all the difference in the world between the processes of persuasion and argument that produce cultural debate and policy and policy, and the imposition of a cultural line, which depends, as it did, and I will use the instances, as it did in the Soviet Union under Stalin, as it did in Nazi Germany, as it does in every authoritarian country. It depends on allegiance to the boss.

[David Remnick]

Well, let's take this Soviet experience as an example. Stalin was somebody interested in culture. Lenin, in fact. That was the price of the ticket to be a leader of the Communist Party. You had to at least feign interest in Russian literature and music. And you had the spectacle of Stalin going to one of the great concert halls in Moscow and witnessing a Shostakovich performance and then coming back and essentially dictating a review, denouncing Shostakovich and ruining the rest of his life and setting down the parameters of Soviet music. And there were similar examples in Pravda and Izvestia about Russian literature. And you knew who was out and who was in, and there was a writer's union that you had to belong to in order to get published. Are we heading in that direction?

[Adam Gopnik]

Look, I pray and believe that we are not. But that is certainly the direction in which one inevitably heads when the political boss takes over key cultural institutions and dictates who's acceptable and who is not. It's funny you mentioned Stalin. I was just watching that great movie the Death of Stalin. And that's what it's all about. He's once a recording, if you remember, of the Mozart piano concerto. And everybody is in desperate straits to reproduce a non existent recording.

[Voice Actor/Performer]

I have wonderful news. Comrade Stalin loved tonight's concerto and would.

[Adam Gopnik]

Like a recording of it right away.

[Voice Actor/Performer]

Which we don't have for reasons that.

[Adam Gopnik]

Are myriad and complex.

[Voice Actor/Performer]

But meanwhile, concerto we just played will be played again, and this time we will record it and. And we will applaud it.

[Adam Gopnik]

Yes, you know, that is the nature of an authoritarian society.

[David Remnick]

But I don't see Trump as a cultural consumer as being particularly voracious of anything other than really television and television news.

[Adam Gopnik]

He loves Les Miserables, Les Mise, and, you know, I tried to.

[David Remnick]

That's ironic, isn't it?

[Adam Gopnik]

Ironic? I don't think it's quite the adequate word for what that is.

[David Remnick]

Explain why.

[Adam Gopnik]

Well, Les Mis is Victor Hugo's great novel of protest against social injustice. It is the ultimate expression of the social justice warrior armed with a pen. But I think more significantly, it's a protest against authoritarianism. Very specifically, it's about Louis Napoleon, Napoleon's nephew, who ruled France for almost 20 years and whom Hugo was implacably against in ways that are eerily parallel to Trumpism. Now we can look back on it and say it was, as autocracies go, a relatively, put this word in heavy quotes, benign one.

[David Remnick]

How do you make sense of the specific moves that Trump has made so far? Where the head of the National Portrait Gallery is forced out the board and the leadership of the Kennedy center is overturned.

[Adam Gopnik]

These are daily insults to the very idea of a pluralist civilization. The people were let go from the Kennedy center board because they were not primarily loyal to Trump. Everything is redefined on an axis in which there is only loyalty.

[David Remnick]

I'm speaking with the New Yorker's Adam Gopnik. We'll continue in just a moment. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour.

[Voice Actor/Performer]

The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by AT&T. There's nothing better than feeling like someone has your back and that things are going to get done without you even having to ask. Like your friend offering to help you move without you even having to offer pizza and drinks first. It's a beautiful thing when someone is two steps ahead of you, quietly making your life easier. Staying connected matters. That's why in the rare event of a network outage, AT and T will proactively credit you for a full day of service. That's the AT&T guarantee. Credit for fiber downtime lasting 20 minutes or more or for wireless downtime lasting 60 minutes or more caused by a single incident impacting 10 or more towers must be connected to impacted tower at onset of outage. Restrictions and exclusions apply. See att.com guarantee for full details. AT&T connecting changes everything.

[Narrator/Announcer]

The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Hims and Hers. If you're someone who values choice in your money, your goals and your future, then you know how frustrating traditional healthcare can be. One size fits all treatments, preset dosages, zero flexibility. It's like trying to budget with a fixed expense you didn't even choose. That's where Hims and Hers comes in. They offer access to personalized care for weight loss, hair loss, sexual health and mental health because your goals, your biology and your lifestyle are anything but average. There are no membership fees and no surprise fees. Just transparent pricing and real care that you can access from anywhere. Feel like your best self with quality, convenient care through hims and hers start your free online visit today at hims.comnyrh that's H I M S.comnyrh to find your personalized treatment options. Not available everywhere. Prescription products require provider consultation. See website for full details, important safety information and restrictions.

[Voice Actor/Performer]

The headlines never stop and it's harder than ever to tell what's real, what matters, and what's just noise. That's where Pod Save America comes in. I'm Tommy Vitor and every week I'm joined by fellow former Obama aides Jon Favreau, Jon Lovett and Dan Pfeiffer to break down the biggest stories, unpack what they mean for the future of our democracy, and add just enough humor to stay sane. Along the way, you'll also hear honest, in depth conversations with big voices in politics, media and culture like Rachel Maddow Gavin Newsom and Mark Cuban. The that you won't find anywhere else. New episodes drop every Tuesday and Friday with deep dives every other weekend. Listen wherever you get your podcasts, watch on YouTube or subscribe on Apple Podcasts for ad free episodes.

[David Remnick]

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick, and I've been speaking today with Adam Gopnik. Adam has written for many years at the New Yorker on questions of culture in history and democracy. He's thought very hard about what makes a democracy live and breathe and also what can bring it to an end. We've been speaking about Donald Trump's campaign to seize control of American culture on a number of museums, universities, performing arts centers, any institution that receives government support. Trump wants to root out what he calls improper ideology, a phrase that would seem to threaten the First Amendment itself. I'll continue my conversation now with Adam Gopnik. So far, the moves, for the most part, have been aimed at institutions that are within the government's easy reach. How do you think it will affect institutions that are a bit more distant, whether it's a movie studio?

[Adam Gopnik]

Well, David, I will say I said after the election that the first thing you would see would be mass pardons. And everybody was saying at the time, not everyone, but many people were saying, he'll pardon the lesser offenders, but he won't try to let the really violent people who beat up cops go.

[David Remnick]

They all came out.

[Adam Gopnik]

They all came out, including people who had been violent on his behalf against cops. And then I said Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert would be next six months on. You would see them disappear. Now, we have elaborate rationales for.

[David Remnick]

The elaborate rationale for Stephen Colbert is that the show is losing 50 million bucks a year, right?

[Adam Gopnik]

That may well be true. Do you suspect, David, that if Stephen Colbert were known to be a Trump sycophant, that that would have affected CBS's?

[David Remnick]

I'm not saying I accept this rationale. And apparently they didn't. When they were toting up these numbers, they didn't include the money that comes from cable affiliates.

[Adam Gopnik]

Well, that's a significant. But the point is that you can see how effectively that happens. And it is typical of every authoritarian society. Talk to your Hungarian friends about how it happens. And each time we find a rationale for it or a rationale is offered, and it's much easier for us to swallow the rationale than defe the reality, because by swallowing the rationale, we can say, well, I enjoyed Stephen Colbert, but really, when was the last time you watched Stephen Colbert's show in its time slot. Right. It's not the way we experience Comedy.

[David Remnick]

It's through YouTube the next morning.

[Adam Gopnik]

YouTube the next morning.

[David Remnick]

Some of this is thematic. You look at the effort against museums in Washington, and one of the themes that constantly comes up, whether it's the African American museum or elsewhere, is about slavery. Trump was given a tour of the African American History Museum, and he's complained that museums focus too much on, quote, how bad slavery was and want us to focus on a, I suppose, a cheerier view of the past. Yeah, listen, this has the ring of familiarity.

[Adam Gopnik]

Yes. I mean, obviously it has been the case since 1865 that there is a very powerful current in American life that wants to rehabilitate the Confederacy and insist that slavery was not the proximate cause of the Civil War.

[David Remnick]

That why would Donald Trump, who was born and raised in Queens, care about this? Is that an attention to his constituency?

[Adam Gopnik]

David, I hardly need remind you that Donald Trump came to prominence as a political figure by saying that Barack Obama was not an American. If you weren't lying, why wouldn't he just solve it? And I wish he would, because if he doesn't, it's one of the greatest scams in the history of politics and in the history period. You are not allowed to be a president if you're not born in this country. He may not have been born in this country. And I'll tell you what, three weeks ago, I thought he was born in this country. Right now, I have some real doubts. That's what he rose on. It's so typical of what happens. We've sort of written that out now. And we say, oh, well, Trump rose because he spoke to dispossessed Middle Westerners. He wasn't talking about economic anxiety. He was talking about how Barack Obama, a black man, was not an American. So why are we surprised when that reappears in the context of the debate on the Smithsonian once again? And this is the hard part, where your intellectual integrity goes to war with your five alarm sense of the threat to democracy. Of course, it's possible to have arguments, and we could debate the famous 1619 Project about exactly how essential racism and slavery are to the foundation of America. And a perfectly reasonable case can be made that though they were one essential stream, the stream running in the opposite direction, the abolitionist stream and the Quaker stream and all of those things, that's why we had a civil war. That's why they called it a civil war, because there was a powerful stream running in the other direction that's an argument about history that is worth having.

[David Remnick]

But the 1776 project, which was constructed.

[Adam Gopnik]

To counter the 1619, the basis of that was what, in your view it was straightforward propaganda. Straightforward propaganda has no authentic desire to explore the complicated and many sided issues in a national history, but simply wants to lay over by now very familiar America first, Charles Lindbergh, Joseph McCarthy, Fiction about American history. And we don't need the fiction. That's one of the things that's so painful about it. We're grown up people. We can count to two. We can say we're immensely patriotic Americans, hugely proud of the inheritance of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. And at the same time we recognize how much exploitation, cruelty, and particularly in the history of slavery, outright evil there was in the founding as well. You have to be emotionally stunted not to be able to say both things are true at once. And we can recognize both truths.

[David Remnick]

Let's talk about the museum world, which you know so well. Trump has claimed that museums are, quote, unquote, the last remaining segment of woke. Well, you laugh, I laugh. But what is he talking about there and what's he fastening onto? What granules of reality is he focusing on?

[Adam Gopnik]

I very much doubt that Trump has been through the last six exhibitions at the Metropolitan, at MoMA, and making notes on the tendentious nature of the but.

[David Remnick]

Let'S call it his administration, right?

[Adam Gopnik]

It's indisputable, right, that there has been a move, compensatory in its original motives, to rewrite the history of art as it's told in our museums, to make it, if I can use the word, more inclusive, to include more women, more people of color who, and it's perfectly fair to say, have largely been left out of that story. That is a process that's perpetually ongoing, in which intellectuals and curators and academics and critics are engaged in perpetual conflict and perpetual argument. And over time, those arguments don't tend to get resolved, but they tend to produce new work, interesting new angles, interesting new vantages. We wouldn't want now to think about the history of Abstract Expressionism without including Joan Mitchell and Helen Frankenthaler and Lee Krasner and artists who were, it's absolutely true, were left out of that story as it was first being told. Does that negate the value of Mark Rothko and Jackson Pollock? No, it expands it. It makes us understand that moment of artistic ferment in a much broader, broader way.

[David Remnick]

Nor does it suggest that the culture warriors on the right are rushing to the defense of Mark Rothko.

[Adam Gopnik]

No. And David, you know, it's. Part of. It is deeply, to my mind, and I use this word cautiously, is deeply tragic because one of the triumphs of American civilization, with all of its deficits, and God knows I've been writing about them, we have had an extraordinary moment of pluralistic cultural revolution, where things that had once seemed terribly threatening, damaging, like modern art, have come to be part of the common experience and to see it being ripped apart. It's not trivial. It's a profound failure and one we have to protect while remaining aware, if I may say remaining awake to the inevitable limitations of progressive pieties in power.

[David Remnick]

One of the things that obtains an authoritarian and totalitarian regimes is not just the official moves against publishing houses, museums, academia and so on, but what it produces in artists, intellectuals and so on. The phenomenon of self censorship. The fear, then, is how you reach people. In other words, your powers of persuasion as a writer. If you keep banging on every single day about the latest outrages, and they come every single day in multiplicity on the hour. Yes, I'm afraid so. What language do you use? How do you behave as a writer, as a communicator, as a journalist, as an essayist, so that you have some effect beyond preaching to the choir? Who is prepared to hear this and accept that language? How do you convince anybody of anything and not be defeated?

[Adam Gopnik]

It's a profound question. On the first part, whenever someone talks about you're preaching to the choir, I don't feel that that's true. What you're doing is you're teaching the choir how to sing in tune. In other words, you're saying, here's the language, the kind of language we should use, here's the kinds of things we should care about. You can use the language of rationality, you can use the language of liberal humanism, if I may call it that, to remind people of what the right tone is to use, as opposed to the hysterical or ideologically fixated tones that we can so easily fly into.

[David Remnick]

How do you respond to readers who say just, Adam, it's already bad enough you're hysterical. Nobody's bursting into the studio to arrest you, to censor you. Take it easy, Adam.

[Adam Gopnik]

I'd say, yes, we should take it easy in the sense that we should turn to a language of wit and humanity. In everything I write about, what good does wit do?

[David Remnick]

Another well poised jab at the Trumpies.

[Adam Gopnik]

Wit does everything. You know who one of my greatest heroes is, David? Maybe my single greatest hero is Albert Camus, right And why? Because when he was writing, a hilarious writer. Well, a man of great sardonic irony, a different French version of hilarious. Because when he was writing for Combat, the French resistance journal, basically it was read by nobody. Right. Because it was a subterranean resistance journal. Right, right. And yet he wrote these beautifully crafted, many veined, multifaceted essays that were not, as the work of the Communist Party in France was, in that way, narrowly, brutally ideological. They were trying to make sense out of a time that made no sense. That's our task, and that's our job. And it doesn't. Our job, I think, is not to persuade in the first instance, because who knows how persuasion happens? Victor Hugo wasn't trying to persuade. He was trying to remind. He was trying to alert. He was trying to.

[David Remnick]

To get the reader to see.

[Adam Gopnik]

To see. To get the reader to see and to offer an alternative vision of human possibilities than the one that was being dictated by the Second Empire and by Louis Napoleon. He was saying that's why he calls it Les Miserables. He said, all of these people who we don't know well are immiserated. Are immiserated, and they're engaged in the same daily struggle for a meaningful life that everyone is. It's why we love. Why even Donald Trump loves Les Mis. Because when they sing Bring Him Home, it has real weight because it comes from Hugo's ability to absorb the entirety of. Of his own society.

[David Remnick]

Trump's attention span is a very important element of our politics and our time. Much depends on his ability or inability or desire or non. Desire to follow through on the impulse of the day. How far do you think this culture war will go, as opposed to all the other fronts that he's fighting on?

[Adam Gopnik]

You know, the truth is, is that I recall as someone raised in Canada, right, when Trump was all afire about annexing Canada. We haven't heard very much about that in the last while. Mark Carney said the only thing it.

[David Remnick]

Seemed to do was to mobilize Canadian politics.

[Adam Gopnik]

Yes. And change the result of the election from a conservative to a liberal. But he seems to have put that aside for the moment. Right. So that's, you know, that may be the. If you like, the Louis Napoleon side of Trump. It goes. It goes back and forth in that way, but I don't think we can underestimate it. There are troops in the streets of Los angeles, in Washington, D.C. chicago shortly.

[David Remnick]

This is not New York, I assume is coming.

[Adam Gopnik]

Yes. The one thing I'll say about Trump's ability to be constantly omnipresent and this is genuinely, I think, an interesting and significant generational divide. My daughter Olivia, just graduated from college, is politically active, organizing conferences. And the side of Trump that I find degrading, she finds not normal, but certainly understandable. Right. That is the round the clock drumming on social media and so on. And her response, and the response of her generation is we have to do the same. It's Mondami doing the treasure hunt, right? The scavenger hunt. It's the understanding that that's the cockpit, that's the coliseum in which this war is fought and that in some social media, social media, TikTok, vertical videos, the whole idea that you have to be plugged in in a different way. You know, John Updike, to my mind, the greatest single writer who ever graced these pages in these halls once wrote, memorably said, at any moment an old world is passing and a new world is coming into being. We have sharper eyes for the fall than the rise, because the old world is the one we know. And I've always thought that the wisdom of that is something that all of us should keep perpetually in mind and not in.

[David Remnick]

So you're suggesting we'll survive this and worse.

[Adam Gopnik]

I hope and believe we will survive this and worse. The daily dose of even the kind of minimal courage it takes to write something is something I'm sure you feel this that you have to draw on again, who wants it really?

[David Remnick]

But it's no. Sometimes I feel Adam and not is. I don't want to write about this at all. After a while, I want to be able to go to a museum and think about art or read a book and think about the novel and not be completely consumed all the time with politics.

[Adam Gopnik]

There's no relief from it feels more oppressive. I feel blessed because I still write with joy about the Frick museum opening or arguments about the history of the Renaissance and so on. They all turn around, though, the same fundamental underlying issue, and that is the persistence of a humane civilization in an inhumane time.

[David Remnick]

Well, how much of this matters? What we've been talking about in the sense that we've now have statistics that tell us that reading has diminished, going to the communal movie theater has diminished, that something has happened to our attention spans and the way we. The way we're reading or not and what we're looking at or not, how much does this culture war matter?

[Adam Gopnik]

You know, I'm something of an optimist or at least a bit of a neutralist about that, and to use a terrible prefix to A sentence you and I are old enough to remember when people said about television, network television. Right.

[David Remnick]

There was a famous book, four Arguments for the Abolition of Television.

[Narrator/Announcer]

Yeah.

[Adam Gopnik]

So I'm a bit of a steady state thinker about how those things proceed. But I think that what you put your finger on, though, is that the problem is that politics should be arguments about policy, if you like, how high should interest rates be, what's the best way of providing housing, what's the. And then deeper issues. I'm, you know, believe in war, gun control.

[David Remnick]

Sure.

[Adam Gopnik]

But people believe that guns are a form of autonomy. Those are all arguments we can have. Eliminating the possibility, denigrating the necessity of a pluralist civilization is a kind of plague that I think is almost impossible to recover from. And it's our job not to persuade because we have limited power to do that, but to assert the value of pluralism over and over every week, if you like, and certainly always in our work.

[David Remnick]

The last time you were here, you made some dire predictions about what would happen. And if anything, they've been eclipsed by worse. There's in excess of three years left in this administration. If things go their normal way, what do you predict in terms of culture war and the eclipsing of democratic norms?

[Adam Gopnik]

Further, it could very well continue to go worse and worse. The 20th century was a horrible century, but it taught one unmistakable lesson, which was that you had to be as hard on the totalitarian temptations of the left as. As you did on the authoritarian appetites of the right. And it was perilously easy then, as it is perilously easy now to say, well, but they're on my side. And you see this happening on the right all the time. Otherwise decent people who know what kind of an authoritarian Trump is, who recognize it, who have no sympathy with him as a human being or as an ideolog. But the other side is so dangerous. They're so woke, they're so anti Semitic, they're so, you know, you can find a hundred reasons. And then you make a deal with the devil. And that's why we call it, you know, Vichy. That was the key thing, property of the Vichy regime In France in the Second World War, it was that all of those right wing intellectuals hated the Nazis, hated the Germans, but they hated Leon Bloom and the socialists even more. That was a deal they made with the devil that France has regretted ever since. It was a primal wound to French dignity and to French continuity. We are in the process of inflicting a similarly primal wound on ourselves. If we do not remember the lesson that history teaches us, which is you have to be equally discerning and equally determined not to fall prey to that temptation.

[David Remnick]

Adam Gopnik thank you David.

[Adam Gopnik]

Pleasure to talk to you.

[David Remnick]

Adam Gopnik is a longtime staff writer at the New Yorker, and you can find his [e-mail] by the way, this week we published a special anniversary issue all about the culture industry, an issue in which Jill Lepore considers Trump's directive to the Smithsonian, and many of our reporters examine everything from the fall of pop music criticism to the rise of a 24, the hottest movie studio around these days. And if you look closely, there is something anomalous about the COVID as well. You can read all of it and see all of [e-mail] and you can subscribe to the New Yorker there as well. New yorker.com thanks for listening. See you next time.

[Narrator/Announcer]

The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co production of WNYC Studios and the New Yorker. Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Garbus of Tune Yards, with additional music by Louis Mitchell and Jared Paul. This episode was produced by Max Balton, Adam Howard, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell, Jared Paul and Ursula Sommer, with guidance from Emily Botin and assistance from Michael May, David Gable, Alex Barsch, Victor Guan and Alejandra Dekin. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Tsarina Endowment Fund. Gas, Groceries, Eating out it all adds up fast. With the Verizon Visa card you get rewarded every time you spend. Get 4% in rewards on gas, dining and at grocery stores and you can put those rewards toward your Verizon bill or on new tech like a smartwatch and earbuds. Apply today at Verizon. Application required. Subject to credit approval. Must be a Verizon mobile account owner or manager or FIOS account owner. See verizon.com Verizon Visa card for terms and restrictions. The Verizon Visa signature card is issued by Synchrony bank pursuant to a license from Visa USA Inc.

[Adam Gopnik]

Do you know.

[David Remnick]

About Jerry Lee Lewis wanting to murder Elvis? Or the hip hop star who cannibalized his roommate?

[Adam Gopnik]

What about the murders AC DC was blamed for?

[David Remnick]

Or the suspicious deaths of Brittany Murphy in River Phoenix?

[Adam Gopnik]

Or about Anthony Bourdain's wild lust for.

[David Remnick]

Life and untimely demise? These stories and more are told in the award winning Disgraceland Podcast hosted by me, Jake Brennan every Tuesday where I.

[Adam Gopnik]

Dive deep into subjects from the dark.

[David Remnick]

Side of music, history and entertainment. So follow and listen to Disgraceland on.

[Adam Gopnik]

The free Odyssey app or wherever you get your podcasts.