Jon Meacham on How the Trump Fever Breaks

Summary

The New Yorker Radio Hour

Episode: Jon Meacham on How the Trump Fever Breaks

Host: David Remnick
Guest: Jon Meacham
Date: March 31, 2023

---

Episode Overview

This episode features a searching conversation between host David Remnick and Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Jon Meacham about the enduring threat of Donald Trump to American democracy. Meacham, known for his incisive presidential biographies and as an informal advisor to Joe Biden, discusses the roots of Trumpism, the transformation of the Republican Party, the stakes of the 2024 election, and historical parallels to previous crises in American democracy. The conversation transitions from Meacham’s reflections on history and politics to his personal role advising Biden, and finally addresses whether the “Trump fever” might break, and how.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The Historic Stakes of the Trump Moment

• David Remnick sets the stage by reminding listeners of Trump’s disregard for democratic norms and the ongoing legal investigations he faces. Remnick asks Meacham about the gravity of Trump’s return to the political stage and the stakes for the nation ([00:09]–[01:57]).
• Jon Meacham:

  “What’s at stake is whether America now has 47 or 48% of the likely electorate to show up in 2024 who are more likely than not to vote for an overtly autocratic figure...someone who has explicitly said that the rule of law should not apply to him. The results of free and fair elections should not be obeyed if he loses them.” ([01:57])

2. The Illusion of Trump’s Political Demise

• Remnick and Meacham discuss the persistent belief—especially among establishment Republicans—that Trump’s influence would eventually fade following the January 6th insurrection and subsequent elections.
• Meacham:

  “I now refer to this overly glibly, as the Republican Brigadoon fantasy, that there is this world where Trump just disappears and that world’s going to come back and reassert itself. ... The only problem with that fantasy is that it is fact-free.” ([03:29])

3. Trumpism’s Historical Roots and Novelty

• Remnick challenges Meacham on the Republican Party’s complicity, noting that currents of Trumpism have longstanding roots in party politics.
• Meacham:

  “Trumpism was not inevitable unless you go back to an elemental argument about human nature, which is that power is all. ... Nixon, in the end, had a sense of shame, and we’re not there now.” ([05:35])

4. Meacham’s Role Advising Joe Biden

• Remnick explores Meacham’s unusual transition from journalist and historian to an outside advisor for President Biden—particularly on speeches.
• Meacham:

  “I see this as an act of citizenship. And I believe that Trumpism is a fundamental threat to the things that we have long held dear. ... If I can be of help in articulating a vision of the country that puts the best of the country front and center, then I want to do that.” ([09:22])

5. Drawing Parallels: Lincoln, the Civil War, and the Present Crisis

• The discussion moves to Meacham’s Abraham Lincoln biography, and the tension between viewing the current moment as akin to the 1930s or 1960s versus the more perilous 1850s.
• Meacham:

  “I am increasingly concerned, however, that this is the 1850s, that in fact there are competing visions of reality itself and we are going to fight like hell against the tyrannical Democrats and any Republicans who do, who deals with them. It will be your peril if you underestimate this movement again.... It was settled by the sword, by the Civil War.” ([10:47])

6. Is Biden Up to the Challenge?

• Remnick questions whether Biden—an “older guy whose eloquence is not Lincoln-esque”—can shoulder the historical burden in facing Trump again.
• Meacham:

  “The question, I believe, is as much, are we up to it as President Biden? ... I think the person at the top matters enormously, obviously, but this is up to all of us.” ([14:29])

7. The Persistence of Trump’s Grip & The Limits of Legal Consequences

• On whether Ron DeSantis represents an alternative to Trump or merely another form of Trumpism, and what impact indictments might have:
• Meacham:

  “I think the Trump grip on that base of folks is so strong that it’s just going to be. ... To have an indicted former president seeking reelection with a huge chunk of a formally functional opposition political party ... is unprecedented. What is not unprecedented is the case that has to be made to defeat him.” ([15:30], [16:05])

8. Breaking the Fever: What Will Change Things?

• Remnick probes Meacham on whether he thinks the “fever” of Trumpism will end, especially in light of prominent Republicans’ continued support.
• Meacham:

  “The fever only breaks if they lose. Let’s be very clear here. ... You’re never getting rid of it. Right. But it can be contained. My view is it is only contained if they keep losing.” ([18:22])

9. Democracy as a Perennial Struggle

• Meacham warns against nostalgia and mythologizing a “golden age” of American democracy, arguing that the fight between the nation’s worst instincts and its “better angels” is ongoing and hard-won.
• Meacham:

  “It is a perennial struggle. ... The remarkable thing about the American experiment is that after much blood, much strife, much chaos, those better angels have just managed to eke out a provisional victory. And I think that’s the struggle we’re in now.” ([18:56])

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On the Republican “Brigadoon Fantasy”:

  “There is this world where Trump just disappears and that world’s going to come back and reassert itself. ... The only problem with that fantasy is that it is fact free.”
  — Jon Meacham ([03:29])

• On the necessity of defeat to break Trumpism’s hold:

  “The fever only breaks if they lose. Let’s be very clear here.”
  — Jon Meacham ([18:22])

• On the burden of democracy:

  “It is a perennial battle ... between our worst instincts and the better angels of our nature, to use Lincoln’s phrase.”
  — Jon Meacham ([18:56])

• On Biden’s capacity vs. the public’s responsibility:

  “The question, I believe, is as much, are we up to it as President Biden?”
  — Jon Meacham ([14:29])

---

Important Segment Timestamps

• [01:57] — Meacham outlines what’s at stake in the Trump era.
• [03:29] — The “Brigadoon fantasy” and why Trump hasn’t faded.
• [05:35] — Long-term roots of Trumpism (and their limits).
• [09:22] — Meacham reflects on advising Biden and the ethics of his involvement.
• [10:47] — The crisis of democracy: Are we in an 1850s moment?
• [14:29] — On whether Biden (and Americans) can meet this challenge.
• [15:30] — DeSantis, indictments, and the unbroken base.
• [18:22] — Only defeat can “break the fever” of Trumpism.
• [18:56] — Democracy as an ongoing struggle.

---

Episode Tone and Language

The conversation is thoughtful, historically grounded, and urgent in tone. Meacham’s responses are steeped in reverence for American history while clearly identifying the present risks. Remnick presses with journalistic skepticism but allows space for reflective and sometimes deeply personal insights from Meacham.

---

Summary for New Listeners

This episode offers a rich historical framework to understand today’s political crisis through Jon Meacham’s measured yet grave reflections on Trump, Trumpism, and the Republican Party. It explores the persistent belief that Trumpism will fade, the deeper (and sometimes overlooked) roots of authoritarian impulses in American politics, the role of historians and citizens in times of crisis, and the parallels between America’s current divides and those preceding the Civil War. Above all, Meacham argues, breaking the fever of Trumpism is not inevitable—it will require engagement, defeat at the ballot box, and an ongoing collective struggle for democracy’s soul.

Transcript

[Kelefa Sanneh]

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour.

[Jon Meacham]

A co production of WNYC Studios and the New Yorker.

[David Remnick]

Welcome to the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. Donald Trump's contempt for democracy is a matter of fact, an impulse registered again and again throughout his presidency in its aftermath, as so many, including those in his circle, warned he would never accept legitimacy of Biden's election. And of course, he provoked an insurrection attempting to stop that election, and he has faced no consequences for it so far. There was some buzzing after the midterm elections that Trump's influence on the GOP had finally burned out, but the fact is that he's running for president, and he leads the Republican field. In 2018, at the midpoint of the Trump presidency, the journalist and historian Jon Meacham wrote a book called the Soul of America, and it warned of the gravity of Trump's threat to democracy. Now, this was hardly a unique point of view, but Meacham's particular way of putting things, steeped in a kind of critical reverence for American history, hit home with one reader in particular, Joe Biden. And in the years since, Meacham became an informal advisor to Biden, helping him with the last State of the Union address and other speeches. Jon Meacham's books include biographies of Jefferson, Jackson, George H.W. bush, John Lewis, and Abraham Lincoln. We spoke last week, John. The press spends a huge amount of time obsessing about the odds, the mood, the events of the day. Let's talk about the stakes as we witness the renewed and unending tragedy of Donald Trump, his candidacy, his battles with the law, from New York to Georgia to D.C. what is at stake now in this latest chapter?

[Jon Meacham]

What's at stake is whether America now has 47 or 48% of the likely electorate to show up in 2024 who are more likely than not to vote for an overtly autocratic figure for President of the United States, someone who has explicitly said that the rule of law should not apply to him. The the results of free and fair elections should not be obeyed if he loses them.

[David Remnick]

The District Attorney of New York, under the auspices and direction of the Department of injustice in Washington, D.C. was investigating me for something that is not a crime, not a misdemeanor, not an affair.

[Jon Meacham]

Having a dictatorial figure is not new, either in human experience or American history. What is new is that so many people are willing to suspend their better judgment to support him.

[David Remnick]

Did we make a mistake? Did many people not make a mistake thinking that with the results of the last election and Then the spectacle of January 6th, this somehow, this impulse of authoritarianism would begin to recede, and maybe even recede fairly rapidly. Was that not a gigantic illusion?

[Jon Meacham]

That's a good way to put it. It was a gigantic illusion, and it's a persistent one. I am friends with principled Republicans who have said to me for going on eight years now, since 2015, that Trump was going to fade, that it wouldn't work, that his hour either A, would not come or B, would pass. And I now refer to this overly glibly, as the Republican Brigadoon fantasy, that there is this world where Trump just disappears and that world's going to come back and reassert itself. And the only problem with that fantasy is that it is fact free and it is a trope, that every election is more important than any other election. But this is not 1976, this isn't 1980. This isn't a difference of degree, which is what presidential elections tend to be. Partisans don't believe that, but I believe that it's a difference of kind.

[David Remnick]

But when we're assessing where Donald Trump came from, I think a lot of people would argue that some of the origins come from people that you have studied and have admired, whether it's the Lee Atwater side of the George H.W. bush campaign or Ronald Reagan speaking for states rights in Mississippi, that elements of Trumpism have been present in the Republican Party in the establishment for a very long time. So when you're assessing where Trumpism came from, how do you begin to analyze the roots of it?

[Jon Meacham]

I am more skeptical of the long term Republican complicity in Trumpism. For this reason, Trumpism was not inevitable unless you go back to an elemental argument about human nature, which is that power is all. And I simply don't believe that the Republican figures that are kind of corralled up in this particular critique would have acted that way. I don't think Ronald Reagan would have done it. Richard Nixon broke the law, but then he followed the law. Nixon, in the end, had a sense of shame, and we're not there now.

[David Remnick]

John, speaking of stakes, your involvement, your personal involvement in the stakes have shifted. You had a long and storied career as a journalism story.

[Jon Meacham]

I like that story.

[David Remnick]

That's what we say in sports. The storied fullback. And you more fully shifted to being a historian. You've written some remarkable and best selling biographies, presidential biographies. The most recent is and there Was light about Lincoln. And yet you also are getting more and more involved or have been involved, particularly with Joe Biden as a kind of outside advisor, particularly on speeches. And I think it would be good to know what your association with Joe Biden is, how it began and where it got to, how far it goes or how far it doesn't go.

[Jon Meacham]

Fifteen years ago, I wrote a book called American Gospel, and Joe Biden was making, at that point, his second run for president. It lasted, I think, about 30 minutes. But he read that book, and after he was done with the campaign or toward the end of his campaign, he actually took me aside at an event and showed me some laminated cards he had in his pocket that had quotations from the book. Now, as you know, when writers are shown their own words, we tend to approve of the taste and wisdom of the person who found those words.

[David Remnick]

You were flattered?

[Jon Meacham]

Absolutely. Of course. So 2017, Vice President Biden, former Vice President Biden, had written the book about the loss of his son Beau, and we did a book event here in Nashville. I interviewed him for a crowd, and so we became friendly. But my view of engagement, I spoke to the Democratic Convention at his request, and I have helped with the drafting of speeches, which I hate talking about, because if you're going to serve in that way, you shouldn't talk about it.

[David Remnick]

But again, did any of this make you feel uncomfortable? Because for journalists, you could be for somebody or against somebody editorially in the obvious way, but to be writing speeches, to be speaking at a political convention, et cetera, that's another matter. No. Did you.

[Jon Meacham]

It is a matter. It is another matter. No. But I'm not a journalist anymore. I'm a biographer. I'm a professor. And I believe firmly that to whom much is given, much is expected. I don't want to profit from this. I see this as an act of citizenship. And I believe that Trumpism is a fundamental threat to the things that we have long held dear. And so I want, if I can be of help in articulating a vision of the country that puts the Declaration, that puts the pursuit of justice, that puts the best of the country front and center, then I want to do that.

[David Remnick]

Many books are written about Abraham Lincoln. Many, many, many biographies. In sec. There are so many books written about Lincoln that I believe every year there's an award given to the best book about Abraham Lincoln. Your book is at once a biography, but I also think it resonates very, very deliberately, if not overtly, with the present moment. Was that the impetus for the book, and how does it resonate to you?

[Jon Meacham]

In many ways, it was. So I thought that our current moment was like 1933 or 1968 where there were proto fascist forces. There was a sense that democracy had run out its string and that enough conscientious effort went into keeping democracy alive. I am increasingly concerned, however, having made that argument, that this is the 1850s, that in fact there are competing visions of reality itself and we are going to fight like hell against the tyrannical Democrats and any Republicans who do, who deals with them. It will be your peril if you underestimate this movement again. It was not settled by a congressional debate. It was not settled by a brooking seminar. It was not settled through the ordinary protocols of politics. It was settled by the sword, by the Civil War, by the death of what demographers now believe might have been 750,000Americans. And what I wanted to explore, and Lincoln rests at the center of this question, is why did Abraham Lincoln, why did he do what he did? Because he was a politician. Abraham Lincoln, for all of his failings, fundamentally believed that slavery was wrong and could not be expanded. And so why, why did he think that he thought it and acted on it because his conscience told him so. Lincoln put the moral convictions of anti slavery at the center of his undertaking and he didn't have to.

[David Remnick]

I think what you're saying by inference is that in no small measure that the burden on Joe Biden and Joe Biden's candidacy, presumably for reelection, is of that historical weight. And if he does not succeed, then we don't know what the consequences could be. People were mocking about the recent book by Barbara Walter about the possibility of civil war in this country, but you seem to be inviting that potential comparison. So that's one thing. The other thing is, is Joe Biden up to it? Abraham Lincoln's capacities, his eloquence was extraordinary by any measure. Joe Biden is an older guy whose eloquence is not Lincoln esque. And he also has a lot of other things on his plate, including a land war in Europe and any number of other issues impinging on him, to say nothing about the fate of the planet itself. Is Joe Biden up to defeating Donald Trump again and at the same time righting this country?

[Jon Meacham]

The question, I believe, is as much, are we up to it as President Biden? President Biden is not no American president is Zeus like. And so I think it's up to 51% of us or more to recognize what path we should take and take it. And so I wouldn't put the whole onus on any single person, including Lincoln. The Union army had a lot to do with this. Black Americans had a lot to do with this. I think the person at the top matters enormously, obviously, but this is up to all of us.

[David Remnick]

Do you think Ron DeSantis represents Trumpism or some other kind of Republicanism?

[Jon Meacham]

I'm not an early investor in the Ron DeSantis conventional wisdom. I think the Trump grip on that base of folks is so strong that it's just going to be. It's very hard for me to see how he doesn't win the nomination. And I know, again, what role will.

[David Remnick]

Indictment, legal indictment, play in that?

[Jon Meacham]

It could help. That's the. That's the world we're in, right?

[David Remnick]

Is that indictment in Georgia, indictment in Washington, indictment in New York. Any of them could help, you're saying?

[Jon Meacham]

I think so. I mean, I don't. We're in genuine. We're in uncharted territory. But to have an indicted former president seeking reelection with a huge chunk of a formally functional opposition political party in the United States is, yes, is unprecedented. What is not unprecedented is the case that has to be made to defeat him. And that is a case for a constitutional order informed by a journey toward recognizing the promise of human equality that was articulated, if not realized, at the beginning of the adventure. And the great question for my Republican friends is, do you have the ability, do you have the capacity to vote for the other party in order to preserve the experiment? I don't have a partisan enough brain to even think that's a hard call. I have voted for Republican presidential candidates. I am flummoxed to some extent at the durability of partisan feeling. Your colleagues Susan Glasser and Peter Baker have reported that James Addison Baker III voted for Donald Trump twice.

[David Remnick]

I mean, isn't that outrageous to your ear?

[Jon Meacham]

Yes, and I don't understand it. A man who gave much a huge chunk of his life to a constitutional experiment, to preserving America's role in the world, voted for the nominee of his party, no matter who the nominee was. And I just don't understand it.

[David Remnick]

But then what gives you the notion that somehow that this fever will break?

[Jon Meacham]

The fever only breaks if they lose. Let's be very clear here. The only way that Trumpism recedes from its power, and you're never getting rid of it. Right. But it can be contained. My view is it is only contained if they keep losing.

[David Remnick]

And that means that democracy, American democracy, is on the edge at all times and that we didn't recognize.

[Jon Meacham]

Of course it's on the edge at all times. It's fundamentally a human enterprise. We can't outsource this. I'm not talking about this is important to me, David. I'm not arguing that there is a mythical moment, that there is a moment at Gettysburg on the farm with Eisenhower where if we could just beam ourselves back there, everything was great and everything will be great again. It is a perennial struggle. It is a perennial battle. I have argued between our worst instincts and the better angels of our nature, to use Lincoln's phrase. And the remarkable thing about the American experiment is that after much blood, much strife, much chaos, those better angels have just managed to eke out a provisional victory. And I think that's the struggle we're in now.

[David Remnick]

Jon Meacham, thanks so much.

[Jon Meacham]

Thank you.

[David Remnick]

Jon Meacham is a recovering journalist and a presidential historian. He's also a winner of the Pulitzer Prize. His book about Abraham Lincoln from last year is called and There Was Light. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour with more to come. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. We're going to close the show today with the New Yorker's Kelefa Sanneh. Kelefa writes about politics, sports, music. He is absolutely passionate about music. His book Major Labels is a history of popular music, genre by genre. And in the New Yorker, he wrote recently about an artist I wasn't familiar with who goes by the name Hardy.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Hardy.

[David Remnick]

Hardy. Hardy.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

In this case, Michael Hardy, who's kind of made his name as a country singer and songwriter. And he has a new song on his new album called Radio Song that I wanted to play for you.

[David Remnick]

All right, here we go.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

So his radio song is about. Is a country song that can't be played on country radio.

[David Remnick]

I didn't hear that.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

And it's part of his shift. His new album is half country music and half rock music.

[David Remnick]

What's his story?

[Kelefa Sanneh]

He's a guy who grew up in Philadelphia, Mississippi. So he grew up culturally country, but that wasn't really what he listened to. He was listening to. I think it started with Pearl Jam and it went into Linkin Park.

[David Remnick]

Oh, you can hear the Lincoln park roaring through it.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Nu metal, listening to the music that is sometimes referred to as butt rock.

[David Remnick]

Okay. All right. What is that?

[Kelefa Sanneh]

As far as we know, the phrase butt rock comes from.

[David Remnick]

How are we spelling it?

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Spelled?

[David Remnick]

With two T's. There we go.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

But it comes from the rock radio stations that promise to play nothing but rock.

[David Remnick]

Exactly. Right. Oh, my God.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

So he. And it's funny. Like it's such an old fashioned Tradition. Now you turn on these stations and they're still playing Metallica and. And they're playing, you know, old songs and they're playing like Papa Roach and Disturbed, like new albums by these bands. And so in this context, Hardy is kind of a breath of fresh air. He has a song on rock radio right now called Jack, I can make you famous by the way my name is.

[David Remnick]

It's so crazy. So it starts out country, and by the time you, you know, three lines later, you're in Linkin Parkland.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Yeah. And so the whole second half of his album is rock. And, you know, I have a theory that, you know, there was a time, not that long ago when country music was, like, considered the most uncool music in the country.

[David Remnick]

Right.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Like, and people, you know, coastal elites love to sneer at country music. I. I think maybe it has now been overtaken by rock. I think that kind of like loud mainstream rock, nu metal, sort of post grunge is now kind of the most unfashionable music in America. I think so.

[David Remnick]

Among coastal. Yeah.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

And I think those people, I think, by comparison, that's why someone like Hardy, who arrives from the country world, is able to sort of bring some fresh energy to it.

[David Remnick]

So Hardy outlined what makes a song a radio hit in the first track that we played. What makes this song good for rock radio?

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Well, it's a, you know, it's a specific tradition, right. It's this thing that happened since grunge where it was a lot of minor keys. And then in the late 90s and the early 2000s, you get the heaviness, you get the breaks. Hardy. I talked to Hardy. He told me, you know, there was a point in high school where he just wanted to hear something that was heavy. And if it was, you know, these kind of hardcore and metalcore bands, punk bands like A day to Remember or August Burns Red, he just wanted, like a heavy mosh part.

[David Remnick]

So at the super bowl and then at the Grammys, again, you've seen hip hop celebrate and venerated as almost a historical genre. Is rock and roll so dead that's beneath consideration?

[Kelefa Sanneh]

It sometimes feels that way. I think one of the things that happens is that rock and roll is just more traditional. It's not that it's about chasing the latest trends. It's that different styles kind of get resurrected. You know, there's a band on rock radio right now called Giovanni and the Hired Guns. They are self described Tejano punk boys from Texas.

[David Remnick]

Right.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

And, you know, so they're drawing from, you know, a lot of bands like Weezer, Blink 182, but also the Noro music that they grew up on. This is a song they have called Overrated. And you can kind of hear those traditions colliding. What did I do this time, Mamacita? Did it cross your mind? So please note the tuba.

[David Remnick]

Listen to the lead singer's voice, though. Who does that remind you of?

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Who does it remind you of?

[David Remnick]

Kurt Cobain.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Well, yes, the shadow of Kurt Cobain, you know, is a long shadow. And it's amazing how there's a sense in which rock and roll has never really recovered from the shock of Nirvana. At least that kind of rock.

[David Remnick]

How do you mean?

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Well, I mean, he. You think about the hair metal era lasts what, four or five years from 85, 86, and then it ends in maybe 91. Whereas the grunge and the post grunge era feels like it never really goes away. It's incredible.

[David Remnick]

Now, this music also seems influenced by. Let's bring the personal into this. You were in bands when you were kind of punk bands playing bass. There's a little bit of that power in there too.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Yes, I mean, that's the idea that, like, there's some kids out there that want to scream at the top of their lungs. That's a very. That's a very common and popular idea. And it's also the fact that these cycles, they keep going. I mean, you know, we remember when the strokes 20 years ago were, you know, borrowing an old Tom Petty riff from the 1970s and reusing it. So. So now we have bands like there's this band Avoid, I think a very entertaining young band from Seattle, and they're dusting off the long ago sounds of the 2000s. I kind of. I remember this stuff like I was at those concerts, not as a kid, but as a music critic. And so I know, I think a little bit how you must feel, David, which is.

[David Remnick]

Oh, shut up.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Extremely, extremely old.

[David Remnick]

Let's hear this. Take this Away by a void get.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Up out the way you know it I'll go to go. That's all about games.

[Jon Meacham]

Can't stop, can't stop.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

I'm just trying to live a little bit.

[David Remnick]

There's some familiar moves in there.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

I was going to say, if you listen closely.

[David Remnick]

Stop thing.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

That little riff, you can hear that little riff that you might recall. I know as the editor of this magazine, you spend your days attending to weighty matters like that. Serious. But we can learn important lessons from a band like this. What I'VE learned from that song. And is that as a great man once said, the arc of the rock universe is long, but it bends toward the Red Hot Chili Peppers.

[David Remnick]

These bands that you were playing, they remain outliers for the moment. Where do you see them becoming mainstream?

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Well, one thing that happened with rock and roll is that it's splintered, right? So you have indie rock over here and then even on the radio you have classic rock stations, you have alternative stations that are playing rock bands, but they're also playing Billie Eilish. And then you have like mainstream rock and active rock.

[David Remnick]

Who's list listening to the radio.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Radio is still more popular than you would think. It still drives discovery. Right. People are discovering new music on the.

[David Remnick]

Radio mainly in the car.

[Kelefa Sanneh]

Often in the car. But also people don't want to think too hard, right? Like you log on to Spotify and it gives you all these options. A lot of people just want to like push a button and have something come out and have someone maybe local talk a little bit about the weather and the traffic and play some songs that they're going to like.

[David Remnick]

There's a lesson in there for Netflix too. Okay. It's a huge pleasure. Thanks as always. Thank you. You get to pick one more track. What should we go out on?

[Kelefa Sanneh]

So there's this guy, Jelly Roll, tattooed former rapper from Tennessee, who managed a pretty amazing feat. He went number one on both the country and the rock chart in the last year with different songs. This is his number one rock hit, Dead man.

[David Remnick]

The New Yorker's Kelefasani. You can read his writing on Hardy and 10,000 other [e-mail] I'm David Remnick and thanks for listening. I hope you'll join us next time.

[Producer/Announcer]

The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co production of WNYC Studios and the New Yorker. Our theme music was co composed and performed by Meryl Garbes of Tune Yards with additional music by Alexis Quadrado and Louis Mitchell. This episode was produced by Max Bolton, Breda Greene, Adam Howard Kalalea, Avery Keatley, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell and Gofen Mputubwele with guidance from Emily Botin and assistance from Harrison Keithline, Michael May, David Gable and Meher Bhatia. Specialist assistance this week from Mike Dodge Weiscott of kcrw. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Cherina Endowment Fund.