
The MSNBC host says that Trump’s authoritarian message is timeless. “You can sell [it] to people who are in great need of relief,” she says. “But you can also sell it to billionaires.”
Loading summary
Advertisement Announcer
This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. You chose to hit play on this podcast today. Smart Choice make another smart choice with Auto Quote Explorer to compare rates from multiple car insurance companies all at once. Try it@progressive.com Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Not available in all states or situations. Prices vary based on how you buy.
WNYC Studios Announcer
WNYC Studios is supported by Apple Card.
Advertisement Announcer
Apple Card is the perfect card for your holiday shopping. When you use Apple Card on your iPhone, you'll earn up to 3% daily cash back on every purchase, including products at Apple like a new iPhone 16 or Apple Watch Ultra. Apply now in the Wallet app on your iPhone subject to credit approval. Apple Card issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City branch terms and more@applecard.com the New Yorker Radio Hour is.
Justin Wines Announcer
Supported by Justin Wines. Since 1981, Justin has been producing their signature Bordeaux style wines from Paso Robles on California's Central Coast. With a rich history of accolades, Justin produces exceptional wines and is proud to be America's number one luxury Cabernet. Whether you're a first time wine drinker or a wine aficionado, Justin has a wine for every celebration and occasion. Visit justinwine.com and enter Radio 20 for 20% off your order.
WNYC Studios Announcer
Listener Supported WNYC Studios.
Rachel Maddow
This is the.
WNYC Studios Announcer
New Yorker Radio Hour, a co production of WNYC Studios and the New Yorker.
David Remnick
This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. The word of the day in this election is no longer vibes or joy. It's a much darker word, fascist. The retired four star generals Mark Milley and John Kelly, who both served under Donald Trump, came out and said it. Rachel Maddow could hardly be blamed if she said I told you so. Maddow has been warning of authoritarianism at home for a very long time.
Rachel Maddow
This is not normal American stuff. This isn't American at all. This is strongman authoritarian form of government stuff which our Constitution protects us from explicitly. I mean, what Trump is proposing to do here in America to the media is what Putin of course has already done in Russia.
David Remnick
Maddow's podcast Ultra and her book prequel take the long view on far right movements in America going back to 1939 when a pro Nazi group called the German American Bund held a huge rally in New York City.
Rachel Maddow
What we are actively fighting for under our first a social just white gentile ruled United States. Second gentile controlled labor union free from Jewish Moscow directed domination.
David Remnick
I sat down with Rachel Maddow on stage the other day at the New Yorker Festival. Rachel, let's start with something incredibly cheerful about a mile up the road at Madison Square Garden. I could tell because on the subway down here, I was surrounded by people who were not going here, alas, but going to Madison Square Garden, you could tell by the hats, something very ominous is occurring. There's a rally, a MAGA rally, a Trump rally at Madison Square Garden. I'd like you to describe what you think the resonances are of that rally at Madison Square Garden.
Rachel Maddow
So lots of things have happened at Madison Square Garden. It is, I think it's telling that when Trump announced it immediately, people started talking about February 1939 and the German American Bund holding their rally there, which I want to say was infamous, or their very famous rally there. It actually wasn't that well known. It wasn't sort of a cultural touchstone in American life until fairly recently. There was a beautiful short film that was made about it that raised awareness about it, but also people just started talking about it and citing it and incorporating it into our popular history of what's happened in this city and in this country in the past century. And that historical presence of that boond rally is itself an interesting thing, because I think 10 years ago or 15 years ago, most Americans would not have known that happened. And now we find that Trump is doing one of these final closing argument rallies, and he's doing it there. And we all think of that. So it tells you kind of where our heads are. It also tells you, I think, something important about history, which is that we tell ourselves the stories from our history that we think we need today. So we're talking a lot about authoritarianism. Fascism. We're talking a lot about Hitler. We're talking a lot about stuff that was considered to be off the deep end in terms of mainstream electoral discussion not that long ago. But we're doing it because we are trying to grasp and put in real context the threat that this very new type of American politician represents in 2024. So I am not afraid of the Madison Square garden rally in 2004. Madison Square Garden is where the Republicans all wore band aids as a joke to mock John Kerry's war wounds. 19, 1964. Actually, this date, 1964, 60 years ago today, was Barry Goldwater's closing argument rally before the 1964 election in which he railed against desegregation, got a 28 minute standing ovation and proclaimed that he was about to win the presidency in the greatest upset in the history of American politics. He did not. Ten years before that in 1954, there was a huge rally, 13,000 people at the Garden to try to head off the censure of Joe McCarthy. And Roy Cohn spoke at that. And Gerald L.K. smith, one of America's all time hall of Fame antisemites, was there. William F. Buckley was there. Members of Congress were there. It was organized in terms of the crowd, organized in large part by the National Renaissance Party, which was a uniformed, stormtrooper style Nazi militia that wore swastika armbands. So Madison Square Garden has had its moments, and you may choose one of these analogies instead of the 39 rally, but I think it tells you something about where our heads are at, that those are the kinds of things we're looking for.
David Remnick
We're certainly not thinking about the Knicks, that's for sure. But when you watch Marshall Curry's short film, I think it's about seven minutes long, and it involves the head of the German American Bund speaking and by the way, being attacked by a counter demonstrator. And then this guy's beaten into submission. What's amazing is the stagecraft is right out of what would be a Leni Riefenstahl movie. It was Nazism, people wearing armbands doing the Nazi salute. The rest. If you were to propose this to Donald Trump, he would say, oh, come on, get over it. I was president from 2016 to 2020. This business of fascism and authoritarianism is just wildly overblown. What say you?
Rachel Maddow
I mean, the thing about Curry's film that I think made it land so viscerally is that it seemed really foreign, right? I mean, the film features Fritz Kuhn, who was the head of the German American Bund, who did want fashion himself, wanted to be America's Fuhrer. Part of the problem, the reason he never did was because he spoke with an unpenetrably thick German American accent. It's kind of put people off a little bit.
David Remnick
It was very reassuring.
Rachel Maddow
It was reassuring in a way. Oh, this is a foreign thing. But actually, if you look at Ken Burns film on America and the Holocaust, he features not just footage of Kuhn, but also of other figures in the German American Bund who did not have accents at all and who were preaching the same antisemitic bile. And part of our dissonance there is, how is this America? This seems like such a foreign thing. But then you see the George Washington banners that are hanging on the opposite sides of the stage. Actually the National Renaissance Party, that group that I just referenced from the 1954 rally at the Garden, the leader of the National Renaissance Party published a book titled Adolf Hitler, Europe's George Washington. So there's this effort to take foreign fascism and make it seem American. And our dissonance there is in how can this possibly be homegrown? And when we talk about making America great again and we talk about the threat of an authoritarian takeover in the United States in the form of Trumpism, it is not something foreign. It is something that's coming from a fascist place. That is a recurring, ebbing, flowing tide that we've faced in multiple generations.
David Remnick
Is Donald Trump a fascist?
Rachel Maddow
Yes.
David Remnick
To reassure you, Liz Cheney said the same thing sitting in that chair yesterday.
Rachel Maddow
Liz Cheney and I obviously have always agreed on everything. So we go.
David Remnick
I thought that was true.
Rachel Maddow
We go way back.
David Remnick
I mean, but if he's a fascist, is he a self conscious one?
Rachel Maddow
I don't think it matters. I mean, I think that Robert Paxton's definition of fascism is the most useful. And he describes sort of the messaging that brings fascists to power and then what happens once fascists are in power. And I think Paxton's key insight was to say their policies don't matter. Like what they say they want to do with government doesn't matter. And they never hold to what they say they're going to do with government. And so if you can sort of set that aside and look at the way they claim power, it's almost always the same messaging. It is. We are a nation in decline. We used to be great. We're no longer great. We have been humiliated. Everybody's laughing at us. We've been victimized by traitors within. Stab in the back. Who has sold us out? Who is the expl. Who provides the explanation for why we are no longer great? Well, it's an all powerful enemy that is within that we need to root out. And normal tactics don't work against them. It's a group that is among us and also above us. And they're scheming against us. And we need to turn our force against them. The immigrants, the liberals, the Jews, whatever, whoever you want your scapegoat to be. And once you've defined this superhuman enemy that has ruined the nation, that needs to be opposed. Well, you can't do that with electoral politics. You can't do that with democracy. Because what is democracy? Democracy is the process by which we all as equal citizens participate in a group decision about what we want going forward. You can't have that. If there's an enemy among us who is subverting everything that's great about this nation. They can't participate and so therefore we can't use democratic means. We're in an emergency situation. We need an extraordinary means. Maybe we'll get democracy back someday, but we can't use it now. And you know what? It might have to get a little bloody. We might need a little bit of violence just to save the nation. Just this once.
David Remnick
This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. More to Come.
WNYC Studios Announcer
The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Fundrise Buy Low.
Advertisement Announcer
Sell High Buy low, Sell high. It's a simple concept, but not necessarily an easy concept. Right now, high interest rates have crushed the real estate market, prices are falling and properties are available at a discount, which means fundrise believes now is the time to expand the Fundrise Flagship Fund's billion dollar real estate portfolio. You can add the Fundrise Flagship Fund to your portfolio in minutes by visiting fundrise.comtny that's f u n d r I s e dot com carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fundrise Flagship Fund before investing. This and other information can be found in the Fund's prospectus@fundrise.com Flagship this is a paid advertisement.
Justin Wines Announcer
The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Justin Wines. Since 1981, Justin has been producing their signature Bordeaux style wines from Paso Robles on California's Central Coast. With a rich history of accolades, Justin produces exceptional wines and is proud to be America's number one luxury Cabernet. Whether you're a first time wine drinker or a wine aficionado, Justin has a wine for every celebration and occasion. Visit justinwine.com and enter Radio 20 for 20% off your order.
WNYC Studios Announcer
Don't you love it when you find a new podcast you really like? Well, let me recommend one. It's called Something youg Should Know. I'm Mike Carruthers, the host and in every episode you'll hear fascinating information that will make your life better from top experts. Recently we've done episodes on why you have the personality you do, the science of Luck and the psychology of a restaurant menu you're going to like. Something you Should Know we have literally thousands of five star reviews. Look for something you should know wherever you get your podcasts.
David Remnick
You wrote a book called Prequel. You wrote it with a Purpose. You titled it With a Purpose.
Rachel Maddow
Tell me a little on the nose with the title.
David Remnick
I know that's fine and came out to some degree, I think out of the podcast Ultra as well. Tell me about the generation of that book and it's your intent.
Rachel Maddow
I want us to understand previous fights with fascism, domestic fascism, in this country. Not because I want to make us feel like, oh, we're never going to beat this thing, but because I want us to be proud that we have beat it in the past. And I want the Americans who were good at fighting previous generations of fascists to be famous. And almost none of them are in prequel and in ultra. This podcast that I've done a couple series of, almost none of the good guys are people anybody have heard of. And I'm just trying to. I'm their PR agent. I'm going back and finding dead antifascists in American history who did good work.
David Remnick
What's radically different between the history described in prequel and the history that we're living through now is that in prequel, the bad guys are plenty powerful. Henry Ford, huge industrialist. Charles Coughlin, father Coughlin had how many listeners on a given night? 30 million.
Rachel Maddow
I mean, in a time, we only had 130 million people in the country. He was getting 20 and 30 million people listening to him.
David Remnick
So more than Tucker Carlson?
Rachel Maddow
Oh, yeah, yeah. I mean, I think inarguably the most dominant media figure there's ever been in.
David Remnick
American history, but they weren't President of the United States. That seems to be the elemental difference between prequels and sequel. What are the origins of Donald Trump, in your view?
Rachel Maddow
I'm going to say something that is not nice, which is that I don't care about Donald Trump as a person at all. I mean, I care about him as, you know, I care about him as my fellow man. Like, I think we all, you know, need to recognize the humanity in everyone.
David Remnick
Up to a point.
Rachel Maddow
Well, yeah, but I don't. I mean, you know, failed watercolorist or whatever Hitler was. Right. Like Benito Mussolini, like small fry journalist. Okay. You know, do I care? I don't care. I don't think it's the most important thing about them. Are there things in their individual biographies that might explain why they developed the yen that they had to try to become strong men, leaders and oppressors? Maybe what I think is the importance of Trump is his message. So he's telling, I will protect you.
David Remnick
But if I can interrupt. Rachel, forgive me. What I mean is the social conditions that allowed him to be. In other words, wait, wait, wait. If you looked at, in this case of Hitler, there's the Treaty of Versailles, the humiliation post the First World War, economic conditions, Weimar, all that. What's the analogy here?
Rachel Maddow
There isn't one. I don't think that authoritarianism rises out of economic conditions. I think that there are complicated, difficult, and in some cases, incredibly oppressive economic and social conditions that give rise to all sorts of things. The question is whether or not authoritarianism will rise. And authoritarianism rises because you get a talented demagogue who uses the constant grievances that are always there and channels them into a simple solution. I will take care of you. I will be your protector. All of these things in politics that vex you and that you worry about and that we've been fighting about for so long, you will no longer have to worry about them. You will no longer have to think about them. They will be settled. You will not have to vote again. The people who annoy you and who make you uncomfortable and who disagree with you will disappear. And the really vexatious ones, the ones who really bug you, we may execute them on television, and it'll be fun. It is a future in which politics doesn't exist because the good guys won and they're gonna rule forever. And you can sell that to people who are in great need of relief economically or socioeconomically or who have faced various kinds of oppression. But you can also apparently sell it to billionaires.
David Remnick
The richest person in the country. I think the richest person in the world, Elon Musk, has already established his bona fides within maga, jumping up in the air, contributing tens of millions of dollars the other day, I think, is the second wealthiest person in the country in the world. Jeff Bezos decided it would not be a good idea for the Washington Post, which he owns, to publish a endorsement essay. What does that portend, not just for the Washington Post, but for the country, should Donald Trump win?
Rachel Maddow
I think if the plan is to count on the benevolence and wisdom and courage of billionaires, that's a bad plan. I think it's a bad plan for any industry. I think it's a really bad plan for any country. Yeah, I mean, I just. Some of the stuff that I've worked on in the past year or so and some of the interviews and stuff that I've done, I just think about a person like Lev Parnas, right? Or a person like Stormy Daniels, or a person like Cassidy Hutchinson, Ruby Freeman and Shay Moss. I think about people like that, Americans like that, who have nothing and who have no institution behind them and who have no one supporting them, no one backing them up. They do not have bodyguards, they do not have protection, they do not have money. And I think about those people standing up and saying, this is a truth that I know and that you all ought to hear about. And Trump and his movement are going to be very angry for me to be sharing this. But you need to know, and I think about the bravery of those people, of those Americans. And then you contrast it with Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk. These guys who have more than anyone has ever had in history, and they're so afraid, they are so afraid of losing any tiny little bit of what they have that they're willing to take the, you know, being called and being universally recognized as sniveling cowards because they're so afraid that they might lose some of what they got.
David Remnick
So what do you do? If you're a reporter at the Washington Post or you're on the editorial board, you. What do you do?
Rachel Maddow
Your fear is not helpful to anyone. And the power of the authoritarian is your fear. It's a conscious choice to not be afraid. And ultimately, these authoritarians, their message is based on a lie, right? Trump is not going to be your protector. The people who make you uncomfortable or disagree with you are not going to disappear. There isn't a secret cabal that we can scapegoat and blame for everything. Doing something about immigrants, locking up tens of millions of people in camps is not going to do anything about the price of childcare. If it is going to do something to the price of childcare, it's not going to be what he expects. It's based on a lie. And these guys are just crooks and thieves. And nobody's afraid of crooks and thieves. They're disgusted by them and want them done with. And that psychological message of strength and refusing to play their game, refusing to be afraid to me, is what I've learned from all of those regular Americans I was describing, that I've been trying to do projects with and trying to focus on and trying to interview and trying to showcase. We're not going to be led here by whoever the good version is of Jeff Bezos, right? Or whoever the good version is of Elon Musk. We're going to be led by regular people, by Ruby Freeman and shame us. We're going to be led by Rusty Bowers. We're going to be led by Liz Cheney, frankly, by people who are willing to not be afraid and to act on it and to treat these guys with the disdain they deserve. Opposition matters.
David Remnick
I want to. So you're going to be on an election night panel and I want to know. And you've done this before. The stakes have been high before, but never so high as now. What are you feeling when you're sitting there with the little magic camera there and you're surrounded by your colleagues? What's in your not just your brain, but in your kishkas? How are you processing this?
Rachel Maddow
As they now say, I left my body halfway through the primaries and I will not rejoin my body until Inauguration Day. So after we get done covering Inauguration Day, I will go home and drink and cry, no matter who wins, because I have been holding my feelings at bay.
David Remnick
I think this whole crowd's going to.
Rachel Maddow
Join for months now.
David Remnick
Yes, Rachel Maddow, thank you. Rachel Maddow leads MSNBC's election coverage and her books include prequel about the fascist movement in America. I'm David Remnick. This is the New Yorker radio hour. At newyorker.com you can find a timeline of the most consequential moments of this election as well as the magazine's endorsement essay on Kamala Harris. Thanks for joining us. See you next time.
WNYC Studios Announcer
The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co production of WNYC Studios and the New Yorker. Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Garbus of Tune Yards, with additional music by Louis Mitchell. This episode was produced by Max Bolton, Adam Howard, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell, Jared Paul and Ursula Sommer, with guidance from Emily Bottine and assistance from Michael May, David Gable, Alex Barish, Victor Guan and Alejandra Deckett. Special thanks this week to Kathryn Sterling, Amanda Miller, Nico Brown and Michael Etherington. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Turina Endowment Fund.
Rachel Maddow
There's a lot going on right now. Mounting economic inequality, threats to democracy, environmental disaster, the sour stench of chaos in the air. I'm Brooke Gladstone, host of WNYC's on the Media. Want to understand the reasons and the meanings of the narratives that led us here and maybe how to head them off at the pass that's on the Media's specialty. Take a listen wherever you get your podcasts.
The New Yorker Radio Hour: Rachel Maddow on the Fascist Threat in America, Then and Now
Released on November 4, 2024, "The New Yorker Radio Hour" features a compelling episode titled "Rachel Maddow on the Fascist Threat in America, Then and Now." Hosted by David Remnick and produced in collaboration with WNYC Studios and The New Yorker, this episode delves deep into the resurgence of fascist ideologies in contemporary America, drawing parallels with historical movements. Below is a detailed summary capturing the essence of the discussions, key insights, and conclusions presented by Rachel Maddow.
David Remnick opens the episode by highlighting the increasing use of the term "fascist" in the current election discourse, noting the significance of retired generals Mark Milley and John Kelly labeling the threat as such. He remarks, “The word of the day in this election is no longer vibes or joy. It's a much darker word, fascist” ([01:34]). This sets the stage for a profound conversation with Rachel Maddow about the enduring and evolving threats of authoritarianism in America.
Rachel Maddow asserts the abnormality of the current political climate, stating, “This is not normal American stuff. This isn't American at all. This is strongman authoritarian form of government stuff which our Constitution protects us from explicitly” ([02:05]). She draws a direct comparison between Donald Trump's actions and those of Vladimir Putin in Russia, emphasizing the stark deviation from democratic norms.
Maddow introduces her podcast Ultra and her book Prequel, which examine far-right movements in America dating back to 1939. She references the German American Bund's infamous rally at Madison Square Garden, highlighting how historical fascist activities have resurfaced in contemporary politics. At one point, she reflects on the evolving American consciousness regarding these historical events:
“There was a beautiful short film that was made about it that raised awareness...Now we find that Trump is doing one of these final closing argument rallies, and he's doing it there.” ([03:52])
This comparison underscores the cyclical nature of political extremism and its persistent threats.
The discussion shifts to the significance of Madison Square Garden as a recurring venue for major political rallies. Maddow recounts past events, such as Barry Goldwater's 1964 rally opposing desegregation and the 1954 rally aimed at countering Joe McCarthy's censure, where antisemitic figures like Gerald L.K. Smith and Roy Cohn spoke ([03:52]).
She draws parallels between these historical rallies and the present-day MAGA rallies, suggesting that the choice of venue symbolizes America's ongoing struggle with authoritarian ideologies. Remnick adds context by referencing Marshall Curry's short film depicting the German American Bund's fascist imagery, prompting Maddow to elaborate on the Americanization of foreign fascist symbols:
“There's this effort to take foreign fascism and make it seem American...But when we talk about making America great again and we talk about the threat of an authoritarian takeover in the United States in the form of Trumpism, it is not something foreign.” ([08:25])
A pivotal moment in the episode is Maddow's unequivocal stance on Donald Trump, declaring, “Yes [Trump is a fascist]” ([09:44]). Remnick seeks clarification on whether Trump's fascism is self-conscious, to which Maddow responds by referencing historian Robert Paxton's definition of fascism. She emphasizes that the essence of fascism lies in its manipulative messaging rather than specific policies:
“We are a nation in decline...We need to turn our force against them...We might need a little bit of violence just to save the nation. Just this once.” ([10:06])
This definition underscores the inherent unpredictability and danger of authoritarian leaders who manipulate public sentiment to consolidate power.
The conversation transitions to the influence of billionaires like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg in the political landscape. Maddow criticizes the reliance on the benevolence of the ultra-wealthy, arguing that their fear of losing power undermines democratic institutions:
“I think if the plan is to count on the benevolence and wisdom and courage of billionaires, that's a bad plan.” ([19:38])
In contrast, she lauds ordinary Americans such as Lev Parnas, Stormy Daniels, and Ruby Freeman for their bravery in exposing truths without the backing of powerful institutions. She emphasizes the importance of resistance led by regular people rather than fear-driven elites:
“We're going to be led by regular people...by people who are willing to not be afraid and to act on it and to treat these guys with the disdain they deserve.” ([21:35])
As the episode nears its conclusion, Remnick inquires about the emotional impact of covering such high-stakes political events. Maddow candidly shares her exhaustion and emotional burden, humorously noting:
“I left my body halfway through the primaries and I will not rejoin my body until Inauguration Day...I will go home and drink and cry, no matter who wins.” ([23:47])
This admission highlights the personal toll taken on journalists and commentators witnessing the potential rise of authoritarianism.
In their final exchanges, Remnick and Maddow reiterate the gravity of the political moment. Maddow reinforces the necessity of resilience and courage in the face of authoritarian threats, advocating for ordinary citizens to lead the charge in preserving democracy. Remnick wraps up the episode by directing listeners to additional resources, including a timeline of the election's most consequential moments and The New Yorker's endorsement essay on Kamala Harris.
Notable Quotes:
Rachel Maddow ([02:05]): “This is not normal American stuff. This isn't American at all. This is strongman authoritarian form of government stuff which our Constitution protects us from explicitly.”
Rachel Maddow ([09:44]): “Yes [Donald Trump is a fascist].”
Rachel Maddow ([10:06]): “We are a nation in decline...We need to turn our force against them...We might need a little bit of violence just to save the nation. Just this once.”
Rachel Maddow ([19:38]): “I think if the plan is to count on the benevolence and wisdom and courage of billionaires, that's a bad plan.”
Rachel Maddow ([21:35]): “We're going to be led by regular people...by people who are willing to not be afraid and to act on it and to treat these guys with the disdain they deserve.”
Rachel Maddow ([23:47]): “I left my body halfway through the primaries and I will not rejoin my body until Inauguration Day...I will go home and drink and cry, no matter who wins.”
Conclusion
This episode of "The New Yorker Radio Hour" offers a profound exploration of the fascist threats facing America today, contextualized within its historical continuities and transformations. Through Rachel Maddow's incisive analysis and passionate discourse, listeners gain a nuanced understanding of the complexities surrounding modern authoritarianism, the roles individuals and elites play, and the imperative of safeguarding democratic values.