Loading summary
A
Did you know not all batteries are the same? For example, only Duracell batteries are built different with Power Boost ingredients. And Duracell are the only batteries that make this sound. Every time you say Power Boost ingredients. See Duracell batteries with Power Boost ingredients. You try Duracell Memories.
B
Told you.
A
Duracell batteries are built different with Power Boost ingredients and they're built right here in the USA with US and global parts.
C
Working full time and thinking about graduate school. Post University offers flexible online graduate programs built for working professionals with personalized support. Continue your education on your terms. Become a Post person. Learn more at post. Edu.
A
Hello everyone. This is JVL here with my best friend, Sarah Longwell. Welcome to a very special edition of of the secret show the Last Temptation of Sarah Longwell. This I'm so into this bit because I have come up with a theme show, like an actual idea for a show that centers around me trying to tempt Sarah to the dark side. I think it's going to be tremendous content. Hello, Sarah.
B
I came ready to play, bro.
A
I know you did.
B
I read all the things. I read all your triads.
A
You didn't read today's Triad yet though, did you?
B
No, I'm on the west coast in a hotel and so I haven't gotten to that yet. I was too busy trying to make this hotel room look presentable for camera. I don't know if you can tell that the show light that I'm using is a very intense lamp that is shining right in my eyes right now.
A
No, it's good luck. Now what's funny is that in today's triad, I told people what this whole thing was going to be and I said, I know I can share this with you because Sarah won't be reading it, but if you are a friend of Sarah, don't narc on me. So that all of your friends who read this and you like your Twitter friends.
B
There's no time. We're in it now. I'm right here. You got me. You got me. Pure as the driven snow. Haven't read any of it. Hey, before we jump into it though, I want to tell you, okay, so we, you and I are, we're doing the 92nd Street Y for the book tour. We've started announcing the book tour dates. I promise you guys just sign up and do the book tour stuff and then, you know, we won't talk about the book till it actually comes out and can have the real conversations we need to have. But JBL and I sold out 90 seconds street Y in like 24 hours. Which is funny. It must mean. You know what I think that it is. I think there's a pent up demand to see JBL irl.
A
And so in New York City, in my home, your hometown, in my natural habitat.
B
And so they moved us to a bigger venue. So. So if you were in New York or in New Jersey and you wanted to come, do this and you or wherever the place is near JBL's home and you didn't get a ticket, they're for sale again. Go back and get them. It's a much bigger venue now. So now I'm like nervous about it.
A
We have to sell this out.
B
Yeah. It's a point of pride in part because Tim and Bill are both doing talks with me and obviously we want this one to be the best one. Although Tim was being a crybaby on TNL about coming to Seattle. And I'll tell you, I don't know whether it was because he was insulting Seattle, but that one is also selling out really fast. So if you're in Seattle, Tim may or may not be the person. I may not have Tim come. I may just have JVL come.
A
How about this? In the comments, tell me, who would you rather to see in Seattle, me or Tim? Also, aren't you doing a New Orleans show with Tim? Feels like that's a slam dunk.
B
Yeah, I don't think there's. I don't think we've done that on a book tour yet. But we will do it. I'll go to him. I'll go to him.
A
That would be amazing.
B
New Orleans is great.
A
And I would come to that show as a guest just to sit in the audience and watch that.
B
Well, maybe we'll do that. I did. We've added some things. Like I'm gonna. Actually, some things I can't announce, but we are, we are gonna add some other stuff. So for people who are yelling like, you're not coming to Texas. I am going to come to Texas. So I'm making, I'm going to make it work. I'm going to try to go everywhere.
A
All right, we start today with Mayor Pete. Sarah, you just to refresh. We have a lot of new listeners. Among the active politicians in America. Is there anyone who commands your affections? Who catches your eye? Whose jib you like the cut of better whose than one secretary? Mayor Peter Buttigieg.
B
You know, I will say Jon Ossoff is competing for attention for me right now.
A
You have a type, don't you?
B
I Do have a type. I do. If I had to. I was just thinking about how much I like somewhat optimistic, like guys with nice young man energy. Like there's a real, you know, Pete, John Ossoff, like Westmore. Like, I do have. I as Tim. Tim's always like, you have such a type. I have a little for. For dudes, I would say I like that nice young man energy. Pete in particular, as somebody who said to him, I don't know if you guys haven't heard this story, I'm just going to give you a quick refresher. I met because time.
A
Half of our listeners have not heard this.
B
Yeah, I met Pete once and had like an actual full on embarrassing meltdown. Like I was at a. I was at some like a fancy ish thing and Pete was there as a guest and I saw him and Mara Liaison was there who I. And I was chatting with her and I was like, I love Pete so much. I've never met him. And she was like, oh, I'll introduce you. And so she walks me over and she's like, Pete. Well, I don't think she said Pete. She said, you know, mayor, but to judge, you gotta, you gotta meet Sarah Longwell. You know, you guys should know each other. And he's incredibly sweet and is like, oh, how are you? It's great to meet you. And I was like, oh. And I start to panic. I don't know why. Like, immediately I started to panic. I could not summon. And I meet a lot of politicians and I meet a lot of people who are cool and who I like and I'm fine in this case. I stopped my ability to connect with words. And so I just said, how are your kids? I was like, be a human. Talk about his kids. And he was like, oh, they're. They're great. And he's like, do you have kids? I do. My oldest was born when Trump gave his American Carnage speech. And like, that was really influential to me and thinking about doing this work and he was like, oh, his birthday's on. Whatever the date was of the actual American Carnage speech. And I was like, no. And then I realized I like did not have my speech date. Right. Like, I have. This is a thing I have clearly said, but I was wrong. And I was saying how I watched it in the hospital room and it is true, I watched Trump take the nomination, the Republican nomination, in the hospital room with my baby on my chest. But it was not the American Carnage speech. And so his kid was born near the American Carnage speech. So he knew the date, so I was getting the date wrong. So I'm fumbling around. I can't quite get my grip back. Actually, I'm sort of forgetting there was, like, other elements of the story. But as I'm panicking, I have JVL in my head who always says about Pete, pete's got the best words. And so I just say to Pete, I just really admire you, and I think you have all the best words. Like, he was like, okay. And then I was like, I'm. I'm. Clearly, I'm being a lunatic. And so then I see a guy jbl and I both know, like, who is standing in the corner, and I just point to him and go, oh, I see a guy. There's a guy. And he looks over and he's like, yeah. And I was like. And I don't know if I just walked away, but, like, in some way I, like, melted down.
A
I believe. I believe you. Simply, there's a guy and walked away.
B
Yeah, Like, I walked over to see. Anyway, it was deeply humiliating. Also, though, after I told the story, he's now heard this story from a lot of people. They have told this story back to him. So now he only knows me in that context. Anyway, point is, I have, like, a slight school girl crush on Pete, in part because he has the best words and in part because I do think he is genuinely one of the few people who thinks really hard about what the future should look like. And he is quite good at articulating that, including communicating, including the parts that he doesn't have figured out. And I am a sucker for a great communicator. And he is among the best in the Democratic Party.
A
How about. How about for. For guys who go into the lions den and go on Fox News and talk to conservative voters and meet them where they are. Are you a sucker for that as well?
B
I'm a huge sucker for that. I feel. I feel spiritually politically aligned with Pete. Meaning that I. And I also say, like, when you watch Pete take down, like, he did that thing where it was on CNBC and that maga, one of the MAGA anchors, I forget that guy's name. Pete just, like, tears him apart in sort of a kind way that just leaves you sort of speechless or leaves them speechless, leaves me needing a cigarette. I'm. I'm always so into it when he just demolishes because he's so much smarter than other people. And I lament for Pete the fact that Americans, especially Democrats, don't think he can be the nominee because. Not because of them, but because they think other people won't elect a gay person. And I, I. I find that frustrating in that a little bit like Obama. Right. Nobody thought they were like, I'll vote for a black candidate, but I don't think other people will vote for a black candidate. And I think at some point when people are like, wait a minute. Actually, there's more people like me who actually will vote for a black candidate. I feel the same way about Pete as a. I feel that about Pete's gayness that actually, I do think he could win. But, you know, it depends on a bunch of factors. But anyway, launch into what you want to talk about. I've established for you because I know it's what you want from me, how much I like Pete. So go ahead, set me up.
A
And you. You agree with him. So when Pete says I'm an ideological moderate, that is also speaking your language.
B
It is right.
A
Then he said that just this past week to not us. Notice.
B
Notice. Notice.
A
I am sorry. That is the worst name I've ever heard for a media company.
B
Well, quick.
A
I am so sorry, but what a horrible, horrible name.
B
Do you know why? Because they got established as, like, a politico farm team. Like, like, you know how an F1, they've got, like, an F2. Like, they've got, like, their farm teams.
A
I did not know that.
B
Okay, well, you know, yeah. It's where people sort of train. And so notice did that. And then when the Washington Post fell apart, Notice went and hired a bunch of their best reporters. And so notice is kind of like, in the game now. And unfortunately, probably at some point needs a. Needs a good rebrand.
A
They do good work. I'm just saying that purely as a matter of branding.
B
Sure.
A
Whatever firm they paid to come up with that name for them should be. Should be. Not hired again. Okay.
B
I think it stands for news of the United States.
A
I don't care. It looks wrong. And the. The. The aerial sans serif script with the white N, T, u s, but the yellow O, which makes it look like no tus. Wait, it's. It's wrong. I'm sorry.
B
Axios.
A
Say what you will about Axios. That is a great name.
B
Great name. Strong company.
A
Strong name. It's got the X in it. It doesn't really sound like anything. It doesn't really mean anything, but it kills on search results because it's so different and it sort of rolls off the tongue. It works. It works in every way. This is garbage anyway. Pete Buttigieg. Sat down with the not us people. And he had some things to say about his time in the federal government. In some ways, it radicalized me, Buttigieg told us in an interview. It showed me the need for institutional change. I'm an ideological moderate, but when it comes to our institutions, I think what I saw was just how hard it was to. To get even common sense things done. I'm going to continue here with him. I believe very strongly that there's no going back. It is not possible or even desirable to try to restore a previous status quo. I worry that there's going to be a strong temptation in my party to adopt a kind of return to normalcy agenda. I think if a return to normalcy was possible or workable, then the last administration would have achieved it. Yes. You're with him so far.
B
I'm. I'm totally with him. I've read this whole thing.
A
So then he goes on and talks about the need to reform the supreme court.
B
No, he doesn't.
A
100 he does.
B
No.
A
Let me. Let me effort this. A court that is wildly out of whack with the American. What the American people expect from our judiciary. If we're not willing to. If we're not really willing to undertake that deep reform, then I think we'll continue to have really frequent frustrations no matter who gets elected.
B
Okay.
A
That is, he's not saying expand the Supreme Court, but he's saying expand the Supreme Court, and he's talking about deep institutional change, which runs counter. This is a. This is a place where you and I both struggle because both of us are institutionalists at heart.
B
Yeah.
A
But I have become convinced that even though I'm institutional, as things are so broken that we need to undertake deep reform of the institutions.
B
Yes.
A
And so I don't. I don't. What did you think of Mayor Pete walking up to the. The other side? He doesn't mention the filibuster, but it's pretty clear that he's thinking about eliminating the filibuster. He talked, and he does have a position on executive power, which I found incoherent.
B
The executive power one was kind of incoherent.
A
He was like, the executive needs. The presidency needs to be stronger and weaker. Yeah. Right. He needs to be stronger to do the good things and weaker to do
B
weaker to do the bad things.
A
Sure, sure. Yeah.
B
Yeah. I actually, I chuckled at that one. However, look, I knew where you were going to go with this, and I'm actually Even the thing that you pulled out from the court. Maybe I was reading too fast, but I actually came away from it being like, he doesn't actually mention the court, but if that's from that story, then he did in that interview. But to me, the bigger thing that he was pointing out is something that I say in my book, like, I've got a chapter. We're not going back. And everything he's saying in this piece is part of that. And I was actually really excited to hear him talk about. He's essentially making a red tape argument. He's like, look, we got all this money for infrastructure, and it was impossible to get these things built. It was so hard to get this stuff done. And we're trying to do things for the American people, and we can't. And then he goes on to talk about Doge, which I thought was an excellent point, where he says, Doge was sort of right directionally. Like, there are places where there is waste, fraud, and abuse. There's a lot of inefficiencies in this government. But their plan was just, let's just burn everything down and then just say, like, screw it. And he's like, so not only did it not achieve its objectives. Fact check. Totally true. It also ultimately ends up costing the taxpayers more money because it was done so haphazardly that we both. It both somehow cost more and then. And delivered much less. I do wish we had a better way of articulating not just talking about incompetence, but how bad Republicans are at doing the things that they. That are their stated objectives, which was sort of somehow getting rid of this waste partners. They did none of that. And so Pete is really talking about, how do you build a more efficient government? Okay, that is Sarah Longwell bait, hardcore.
A
He's talking about more than just efficiency. I mean, when he's talking about deep reform. This is clearly a guy who's talking about, like, moving. Not just moving the furniture around, but, like, tearing down some walls and doing a renovation.
B
Sure, but one. So. But he. Speaking of renovation, so he talks about the ballroom. He's like, look, Trump, those guys shouldn't have bulldozed the ballroom. That was stupid. He's like, but the ballroom did actually have a bunch of problems. And he makes this thing where it's like, you shouldn't just defend the institutions just for the sake of defending institutions. Like, a lot of these institutions are. Are sclerotic. They're not delivering for people. And so to me, the. The moving the furniture around was more. When he was talking about the ballroom, he said, it's like you need a new H vac, it needs new wiring, it needs, you know, a bunch of these things. And they just bulldozed it. And he's like, my plan would be, you know, how do we make this something that, that works better for everybody? And so he was saying, like, we don't need a gilded ballroom, but, like, we probably did need an event space there or something. I don't know. He's, I actually saw it as an incredibly pragmatic, thoughtful approach. Now, when he says the Biden stuff radicalized him, what he means is he was trying to implement all of the infrastructure stuff and found it very difficult to do. So that's the part that radicalized him. And so I did not hear him say, let's pack the courts. Although I know he actually thinks we should expand the court. Like, he does think that, that he's one of the people I respect the most who. And he's actually, he's thought about this a great deal. I am interested in his thought process. This is like one of those where I am a term limits person. I would like to figure out how to do term limits for the Supreme Court. That is my preferred way. I think you could get a lot more public support for term limits than you can.
A
You can't do them is the problem. If you show me a way to do term limits, I'm in.
B
Okay, well, that's a lot. That's a different conversation. But like, you remember when I was writing the book, I had a chapter on how somebody should run as a reformer, and we actually ended up cutting it sort of for space and partly because I, I, I didn't want to get into me outlining what the reforms should be.
A
Right.
B
But I do think running, because part of what he's talking about too, is he's like, look, did I think we should shut down the Department of Education? No. Should the Department of Education sit in a different place? Does it need to be as big as it is? We're not delivering a good education system. It's like, what do we do about that? I'm sorry, I know that you felt like somehow what people or I think you thought Pete was saying something counter to me. I read that thing and maybe it's because he's not being so, so, so specific. Both of us can kind of impute our very possible on it. But I found what he was saying to be very refreshing. I think his, his, you know, I have a line in the book that's like, trump's going to burn it all down. The conversation now is what are we going to build in its place? And to me, I felt like this is what Pete was saying. And so I felt like this was as close to my thesis as I've heard a politician get.
A
Okay, so you survived your first temptation.
B
Okay.
A
The second one is going to be much harder. Okay, but first we have to do a little, little ad for our just a little message from a sponsor for, for our free audience here. If you don't like the ads, become a member of Bulwark Plus.
B
No ads on Bulwark Plus.
A
You don't just want to lose weight. You want to look better and feel better. That's why Weight Loss by HIMS now offers access to the FDA approved Wegovy pill and the FDA approved WeGovy pen. WeGovy is designed to help you lose weight and keep it off so you can stay on track with your goals. With WeGovy at hims lose up to 20% or more of your body weight. When combined with dieted exercise, it helps you regulate your appetite and eat less, so success is within reach. Plus, WeGovy is the first ever GLP1 pill for weight loss, so there are no needles needed. Through hims, everything happens online. You'll connect with a licensed provider who will determine if treatment is right for you. If prescribed, your medication is delivered right to your door. No insurance necessary. And it doesn't stop there. HIMSS makes hitting your goals seamless by offering access to 247 messaging with your care team and and in app lifestyle and nutrition support like recipes, meal plans, fitness videos, sleep content and more. Even better, with a range of affordable GLP1 options, HIMSS makes it simple to find a weight loss approach that fits into your world and your wallet. If eligible, you'll get a treatment plan personalized to you and unlimited dosage changes as needed. Ready to reach your goals? Visit himss.com thenextlevel to get a personalized, affordable plan that gets you. That's H I M S.com thenextlevel himss.com thenextlevel Weight loss by HIMSS is not available in all 50 states. WeGovy is the registered trademark of Novo Nordisk as to get started and learn more, including important safety information, WeGovy clinical study information and restrictions, visit HIMSS.com so now Sarah, I want to present you with a piece of wisdom, a piece of. I don't want to prejudge it, a piece of analysis about this week's elections and let me, let me pull it up on screen. I will just read it to you. I don't know if you can see it big enough on your screen here.
B
I can see it.
A
I'm not running for office. This is from this Twitter post. But if I were, these are some of the lessons I'd take away from what happened in New York yesterday. 1. Authenticity is measurable. Voters can smell a focus group from a mile away. Let's just do this. Thumbs up, thumbs down on each of these.
B
Okay. I'm gonna do a thumbs up. Thumbs downs individually, but then I am going to. I'm going to render a different judgment on the totality of it. Okay. Okay.
A
Individual, but just binary. Thumbs up, thumbs up, thumbs up. Okay. Number two. Endorsements from the current Democratic leadership now read like warnings. The establishment wing of the party is no longer a sword. It's a question mark. Sarah.
B
I'm gonna give it like a focus group. I'm gonna give it a middle thumb. I think that is true.
A
You can't do that binary.
B
I let people do something.
A
You're in or you're out. This isn't no focus group. This is the temptation of your soul.
B
Okay, well, I'm sorry.
A
Pick a sign.
B
This is true in some instances and false in others.
A
Is it true in New York?
B
It's true in New York. Okay, so let's say in New York, great. Thumbs up in New York.
A
Number three. Conviction beats caution. The candidates who said hard things about rent, about who pays for what, about Gaza, they won. The triangulators lost. Sarah.
B
Thumbs down.
A
Okay.
B
Okay.
A
Number four. Cost of living is everything. Everything else is wallpaper. Sarah.
B
Hard thumbs up. But I have a caveat to that. But I'll do it at the end.
A
Okay. Number five. The middle is not a strategy. It's an empty room. Voters reached past the establishment to grab someone who actually believes something.
B
Thumbs down.
A
Really? Okay. Interesting.
B
I'll explain. I'll explain.
A
Number six. Don't fear the base. Court it. The Democrats who ran from their own voters lost. The ones who ran toward them won.
B
Thumbs down.
A
Okay. Number seven. If you want to lead a party, you have to be willing to fight inside it. Mamdani didn't ask permission. He took the field.
B
Do
A
it. Feels like this is a Sarah Longwell special.
B
Yeah. Yeah, it is. You know, the question then becomes, how exactly is Mom Donnie doing it? But go ahead.
A
The lesson under the lessons. The country is tired of being managed. People want to be led. Sarah Longwell, what do you think about that?
B
True. True. Thumbs up.
A
Wow. Okay, so on the whole, that's a. That's a pretty Pretty lot of agreement. So do you have any overall thoughts? I'm sure there's some things in there that you quibble with that you maybe don't agree with entirely, but on the
B
whole
A
pretty Sarah aligned view of politics right now in this moment.
B
Yeah. So there's a fair amount of top line agreement. But I want to say two things. One, that reads me like it was written by AI. I do not think it is in the sense that it's all very pat, and I think not. I think that the substance beneath each of those assertions matters a great deal. And I think there's like, a lot of analysis missing for what that means, and I'll just give you an example of what I mean. So I agree strongly with point 4. Affordability. I can't remember. Economy. Affordability. The rest is wallpaper. Okay, why is that number four? You're saying it's everything and the rest is wallpaper.
A
That's your number one guy thinking out. Or a guy or a girl. I don't want to tip my hand on Twitter thinking out loud with their thumbs. I mean, you know, you got to make allowances. It's just Twitter. This isn't a book, not a position paper. I think you love the leadership stuff, right?
B
I do love the leadership. I think leadership matters a great deal.
A
Right. People don't want to be led. How about authenticity? You're big on authenticity. It just seems like this is. On the whole, this is like 80% Sarah Longwell aligned.
B
You know, I think that could come
A
from this book that I've read, How to Eat an Elephant.
B
Do you know that I felt like the Pete stuff much more reflected my book than this particular post, which I think has elements.
A
Post. I mean, Pete sat for, like, you know, five hours with not us.
B
But I think that's why I responded to a better is. It was just more substantive. It had more things to really play the game. Sarah. I'm trying to play. I'm sorry. I know, but the problem is you're playing a game that you're like, Sarah's gonna be like, I agree with all this, and then you're gonna unload whoever the author is, and it's gonna be some joker that I think is dumb. But I want to explain something. The fact that I. I immediately looked at number four, and I was like, if everything else is wallpaper, why is this number four? Authenticity matters a great deal. What does authenticity mean? Is it a buzzword? Because it is a buzzword right now. What does it mean?
A
You both know what authenticity Means, do we.
B
What do you think?
A
Yeah, I think we, we know when we see it.
B
Yeah. I do think it has a lot to do with being comfortable in your own skin. But I also think there's a lot about authenticity can, that can be converted negatively. Like Trump is authentic in that he vice signals and people take that as authenticity and so, and be like, oh, well, I know he lies, but he's telling the truth. Right. He's like, like, so he's, and so I don't always think, I think authenticity is like, do you have a firm sense of who you are that's also in here, right? Like, know what you're saying.
C
Be.
B
Do have conviction Now. I do think that this was like this whole. But this, I think I thumbs down the, the base thing. I think there's a real question over who the base of the Democratic Party is. I think the base of the Democratic Party is black voters, Hispanic voters and suburban college educated voters. I do not think it is people who live in Brooklyn, New York, in
A
New York in these elections. That was the base. Right? These are, these are Wherever you are, wherever you are running, run to the base.
B
And so let me, I just want to, this is a piece I keep threatening to write for you that I need to write and I should write it right now.
A
We got to drop the paywall soon. So don't, you know.
B
All right, well, let's drop the paywall. I'm going to tell you, I want to give you my big united theory
A
of why the DS drop the paywall before I tell people who, who this was.
B
Okay, But I, I, this is, if
A
I told you that this was Pete Ba Judge, you would say, yeah, I'm mostly aligned with that, wouldn't you? Wouldn't you?
B
No, I don't think this is Pete Buttigieg.
A
I'm saying if I told you it was Pete Buttigieg, you'd say, yeah, I mostly align with it.
B
No, I don't think so. I think that there's a bunch of points in here that are true. I also think that this is somebody who is, I think it's facile. Facile. And I also think that it's like real audience capture, like chum to like, you know, there's a lot of people who want to overread what happened in New York to say like, the DSA is ascendant. And I don't think that that's the correct analysis. That's why I think, overall, I don't think that's what's happening here's. What I think is happening. People are very, very angry the Democrats lost to Donald Trump. They are very, very angry that the Democratic Party can't seem to stand up to Donald Trump in any way that's remotely effective. They are furious about it. People, voters all across the country are really strapped financially. There is an affordability crisis. And because of the Iran war and its relationship to our relationship to Israel, we have a perfect storm where people are more open to the candidates who are talking about separating our relationship from Israel, who are talking about affordability in ways that it seems like they care about. Like, that idea of, like, the middle is empty. Like, to me, that is such, like, lame analysis. Like, it's not about being centrist or progressive. It is. People want somebody. You're like, are you gonna go fight for me? Like, it is not an ideological valence. It is an emotional valence.
A
That's what this. That's what this analysis was all about from where I was sitting. Maybe. Okay, this game would have played a little bit better if you had been a little, like, less primed for it to be gotcha. And be willing to be just say, like, yeah, no, no, that's mostly right because on the thumbs up, thumbs down, you were mostly aligned. You were at least 70% aligned.
B
Yeah, but that's all. I don't like that. Like, the bumper stickery of it. Like, there's a lot going on.
A
Well, it's Twitter.
B
Yeah, I know. Yeah, sure.
A
All right, Come join Bulwark Plus. Ride with us every week. We do this, Sarah and me, every Friday.
B
I'm sorry that it's not so fun that I didn't just sit here and be like, yes, jbl, get me. I won't get got.
A
I'm going to tell you who this is on the other side.
C
You know, with two dogs, a kid, and life just constantly happening in our house, I feel like I'm always cleaning something. I've tried a ton of products over the years, but Bullshot Carpet has honestly become one of those things I keep reaching for because it actually works fast. I've used it on rugs and upholstery, even after coffee spills and muddy shoes. I love that it dries quickly and doesn't leave a sticky residue behind. It makes CLE just feel like less of a project. And Bullshot isn't just for carpets. There's a whole line of professional strength foaming cleaners for the messes life throws at you. There's Bullshot Pet for pet stains and odors. Bullshot Degreaser for kitchen grease and Bullshot BBQ for grills and grates. No matter the mess Bullshot handles it. Just shake, point and spray. Now for a limited time, get up to 20% off bullshot and free shipping. When you text bull to 64,000, that's bull to $64,000. For up to 20% off and free shipping, that's B U L L to $64,000. Message and data rates may apply.
Hosts: Jonathan V. Last (JVL), Sarah Longwell
Date: June 27, 2026
In this lively "secret show," JVL and Sarah Longwell dive into the week's political news, focusing on Sarah's perennial soft spot for Mayor Pete Buttigieg and the challenges of institutional reform in American politics. Thematically, the episode centers on contrasting "institutionalist" and "reformer" mindsets, with JVL playfully tempting Sarah away from her usual positions using Buttigieg's own evolving rhetoric and a viral list of political lessons from recent elections. Expect candid discussion, electoral hot takes, and quintessential Bulwark banter.
On institutional reform and frustration:
"Both of us are institutionalists at heart. But I have become convinced that... things are so broken that we need to undertake deep reform of the institutions."
— JVL (13:59)
On political analysis and voter sentiment:
"It’s not about being centrist or progressive... People want somebody... Are you gonna go fight for me? ...It is not an ideological valence. It is an emotional valence."
— Sarah (29:24)
On surface-level electoral hot takes:
“That reads to me like it was written by AI… the substance beneath each of those assertions matters a great deal.”
— Sarah (24:52)
On the difficulty of deep systemic change:
"I am a term limits person. I would like to figure out how to do term limits for the Supreme Court. That is my preferred way. I think you could get a lot more public support for term limits than you can [for court expansion]."
— Sarah (18:21)
This episode of The Next Level showcases the Bulwark cast at their best: disarming candor, sharp analysis, and delightfully nerdy banter. At heart, it's about the inescapable tension between loving American institutions and recognizing they sorely need creative, pragmatic reform. Sarah's affection for Mayor Pete is tested—but with characteristic nuance, she passes “the last temptation” and reaffirms her commitment to thoughtful, not bumper-sticker, politics.