Loading summary
Transcript63 lines
- [00:00]
A
This message comes from NPR sponsor Carvana. Your time is worth more than a waiting game. Carvana gives you a transparent offer for your car in minutes and picks it up from your door. Sell your car today@carvana.com pickup fees may apply.
- [00:20]
B
Hey there. It's the NPR Politics podcast. I'm Miles Parks. I cover voting.
- [00:24]
C
I'm Elena Moore. I cover politics.
- [00:27]
D
And I'm Danielle Kurtzleben. I cover the White House.
- [00:29]
B
And today on the show, Internet influencers. They played a big role in Donald Trump's win in 2024. People are more online than ever before, but campaigns are still figuring out how these content creators fit into our politics. So, Elena, let's start with the basics. How are candidates in 2026 working with political influencers?
- [00:51]
C
Yeah, well, I think first of all, like influencers is kind of an umbrella term just for people who have built brand Internet. The goal of a politician is to connect with a so called influencer and then they can reach that influencer's audience and an audience potentially that a politician didn't have. And so we're seeing lots of different kind of ways that candidates hope to achieve that goal. I would say Trump is a great example in the past of going on non traditional media and collaborating with social media stars. But this time around, we're seeing some similar, you know, playbooks where we saw someone like Republican Spencer Pratt in the Lot Angeles mayor's race. He was a reality TV star turned candidate and he had a huge Internet presence and even went on the most popular podcast in the country of the Joe Rogan experience. And you know, Trump did that as well. That method, it still didn't pan out. He did not advance in the California primary. So it's not like this is a silver bullet or anything. But then at the same time, there are candidates who say they see like tangible, you know, benefits from working with influencers. I think a good example is Democrat Abdul Al Said in Michigan who's he's running for Senate in the open seat and he campaigned alongside the leftist streamer Hassan Piker. And I talked to El Said about it and he told me, yeah, his campaign saw a boost in engagement. They saw an increase in campaign cash. You know, the influencers are supposed to be kind of that bridge to this additional excitement that candidates want to drum up.
- [02:27]
B
Yeah. And I mean, this was something that I found really interesting in your story this week. It touched on a lot on Hasan Piker, who I have to admit, I'm not very online. It's like a name I've heard Before, but I'm not super familiar with him. Can you explain, I guess for people who are like me, who he is and why he matters?
- [02:44]
C
Do not sell yourself short, Miles. You're young, you know things, you know things about the Internet.
- [02:50]
B
I try to avoid the Internet at all costs in some ways I'm going to be honest about it. Anyway, that's a whole separate podcast.
- [02:57]
C
Miles came back from paternity leave and said, what is brat? Never forget. Anyway, anyway, to your question, Hasan Piker is probably one of the most prominent left leaning younger voices on the Internet right now. He is a streamer on Twitch and he spends hours of his days just talking politics and advocating for leftist causes and really not being afraid to clash with the so called like democratic establishment, come out against different policies. He kind of made waves in 2024 because he declined to endorse Kamala Harris for president. He's very much against Israel's war in Gaza and he has drummed up some controversy for his anti Israel views and past comments. But I say all this because he's a very politically charged figure that gets a lot of eyeballs whether they're positive or negative. And I think that again is the key here for a lot of these candidates is that they want attention. And so this election cycle we've been seeing piker juxtaposed to 24 when he decided not to endorse. He's out on the campaign trail now endorsing a handful of progressive candidates that he thinks can get his audience excited again.
- [04:15]
D
You know Elena, as you're talking about that, it makes me think about the Chapo Trap house guys in 2016. It makes me think of Nick Fuentes now. And I wonder your take on this. The influencers who have the most pull or who are most successful in perhaps energizing voters, do they tend to be further from the establishment like Nick Fuentes? I think. Fair to say, I mean he's a white nationalist.
- [04:38]
C
Right.
- [04:39]
D
And like you said, Hasan Piker, he is a leftist. To be clear. I am not saying that's the mirror of white nationalists.
- [04:46]
C
Right, right, right, right.
- [04:47]
D
But I'm wondering, do they tend to be more anti establishment?
- [04:50]
C
Yeah, I mean I think it's hard to overgeneralize, but we can definitely just look at the big names that have come up and they do kind of fall on the end political spectrum. I think another example, he's different because he comes through the organizing space. But was the late right wing activist Charlie Kirk, someone who was for a long time seen as fringe and then of course, as Trump became less and less fringe, as did he in the Republican Party. But I think you're right, Daniel. There is this kind of tendency to kind of rally around somebody who's maybe saying what some would consider the quiet part out loud, you know, and so that kind of gets back to this very, like, Internet friendly coalition building where maybe you don't feel like some people in your community might agree with what you're saying, but there's a corner of the Internet that does. And that gets back again to this idea that influencers have a really unique perspective in today's culture because oftentimes, not always oftentimes, they have national but very specific audiences.
- [05:50]
B
Well, and I think the Piker example is a really interesting one too, Elena, because it's not just that he has a lot of eyeballs, but your story noted specifically who those eyeballs are, which is young white men in a lot of cases, which are the kind of people who Democrats, I think, are pulling their hair out, trying to figure out how to re energize ahead of 2026 and 2028.
- [06:10]
C
Yeah, well, and you know, I asked him, when I spoke with Piker last month, I asked him to describe his audience, and that is how he described it. He said they were roughly 60% young white men. And that is a group that he says is part of that demographic. Democrats have lost that said we should. He also said that his, his audience does lean very Democratic. They're Democratic voters. So we can't necessarily conflate these young white men with the same young white men who voted for Trump. But they are part of a generation and a demographic that we have seen as a whole stray from the party. So the fact that Piker speaks to an audience that is part of this demographic of young white men, I mean, that, that is noticeable for a lot of Democratic campaigns.
- [06:58]
B
Danielle. And I'm also curious about your perspective on how different this is from previous election cycles and other things we've seen candidates do in terms of just campaigning with celebrities. Like, is it really that different? I guess using political influencers with your campaign to, you know, Kamala Harris being on the campaign trail with Beyonce, for instance. I guess is there a difference here or is this just kind of more of the same thing in a different, slightly more internety way?
- [07:26]
D
I think there is definitely a difference. I mean, you, you can consider this a spectrum, I suppose, but for example, I love Beyonce's music as much as the next person, maybe even more. But Beyonce is not a person. I have a parasocial relationship with.
- [07:41]
C
Right.
- [07:41]
D
I like her music, I don't go to her for her opinions. Meanwhile, I you. I think any number of people, I have podcasters who, if I met them in real life, I think I would fangirl out because these are people that we seek, we follow, we have them in our ears, in front of our eyes. In the case of some of these streamers, for hours at a time, or in the case of some of these influencers, we specifically look them up on Instagram or TikTok and we just want to know what they're up to, want to know what they think of XYZ and especially if they're a political influencer. If there's someone like Hassan Piker, for example, people are going to him to know what he thinks about politics. So I think someone like him has the potential to really engage voters. So I think in that way, yeah, I think it is a bit different. It's not just, oh man, movie star. I like, likes this candidate, which many people have pointed out, so what does that tell me? But someone whose opinion you trust. Yeah, I think that can make a difference.
- [08:49]
C
It's also this unique thing where influencers are not journalists, they're not objective. And Piker and some other political commentators really toe this line where they've both established trust and oftentimes are people's in part source of news, but then they also give you their opinion. And so not only do you trust them, you are hearing their views, which is a key difference than political journalism and the work that like we would do. And so I think hearing Piker go out and endorse someone, hearing Piker tell his audience directly what he thinks they should consider in this upcoming midterm, I think that goes a long way. And I asked him when we spoke, what is your message to your audience, you know what, why are you doing this? And here's what he told me.
- [09:35]
E
The message is simple. I'm telling them, I trust this person, I like this person, and I think this person is worth supporting. This is a person that you don't have to just like reluctantly vote for, but this is a person you can go out and door knock for.
- [09:49]
C
So, yeah, I mean, there you hear. It's a call to action directly from someone who, you know, an audience member might really trust and support.
- [09:57]
B
Yeah. And I feel like the key word he says there is trust. You know, I'm telling them I trust this person. And I feel like we're seeing this at the same time where trust in the mainstream media apparatus keeps going down every year, every single poll it's done about it. And then so it makes sense to me that there is a vacuum for people are looking for, okay, who do I trust to tell me what I should be thinking about these issues or who I should be voting for? And so it seems like these influencers are basically filling that void.
- [10:21]
C
Yeah, I think a bit. And I mean, I talked to one expert who studies the social media, Internet, all that alike at all, I guess, and they said, you know, it's, Yeah, I don't know what to call it. Insert academic word. But they said, you know, they think it's gonna get more and more common for politicians to treat podcast appearances and, you know, non traditional media appearances that have huge followings. Joe Rogan has average 12 million listeners a month. They're gonna start treating that this person argued more and more like a traditional, you know, 60 Minutes hit.
- [10:55]
D
And I think one, one additional thing to think when you're talking about some of these influencers, not all, but some of them, being a follower of theirs itself can become a part of your identity. And that is a very powerful poll. Like not just I watch this person, but again, I'm going to go back to Nick Fuentes, his followers, the Groipers. There is a name for them and along with that comes a type of person, a system of beliefs. And I think that these relationships go beyond mere consumption and they go into. I am not just a person who listens to Joe Rogan, Hasan pike or whoever I follow. That is the kind of person I am. I identify with that person. And that is a much stronger pull than. Again, I like Beyonce's music.
- [11:44]
B
All right, this is a good place to leave it. Let's get more into this after the break.
- [11:48]
A
This message comes from Progressive Insurance. Insurance isn't one size fits all. That's why drivers have enjoyed Progressive's name your price tool for years. Now with the name your price tool, you tell them what you want to pay and they'll show you options that fit your budget. So whether you're picking out your first policy or just looking for something that works better for you and your family, they make it easy to see your options. Visit progressive.com, progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates price and coverage match limited by state law.
- [12:17]
C
The World cup is back in the US and the NPR network is covering the fans. The tensions. Teams take the field.
- [12:26]
B
Their nation's histories take the field. Alongside them.
- [12:29]
C
The local transformations.
- [12:30]
D
Just world class soccer right here.
- [12:33]
C
And of course the games follow along on and off the pitch. With the NPR app.
- [12:42]
B
And we're back. So, Elena, we're talking about influencers and campaigns working with these people to get their message out. The big question I have at this point is does it work? I know, I understand that President Trump won the 2024 election and a lot of that was tied to how he used non traditional media. But he's not the only candidate, obviously who's trying to use the Internet. Is there any other broader thinking about whether candidates working with political influencers is translating or does translate to actual votes?
- [13:13]
C
Yeah, we should be extremely clear. This gets a lot of attention because it's relatively new and it's, it's flashy. But we cannot definitively say that online views leads to votes. Like, you know, during 24, especially when you think back to Kamala Harris's like, hype online, we used to always say vibes are not votes. And that continues to be true. And so, yeah, I think there are examples of it translating to votes. And I think there's a lot that goes into that debate of does this work? But this is not something strategists and creators say you can just like throw money at a problem and, you know, fix or, or make work. And I think there are examples of that already, I mean, dating back several, several elections. But it's not new that we've seen some campaigns actually pay influencers to, you know, promote their campaigns. And that's already been a thing this, this cycle. Again, I think about the Democrat billionaire in California who was running in the governor's race, Tom Steyer, he's a progressive there was reporting that he paid influencers tens of thousands of dollars to promot. Then that campaign saw historic amounts of spending in general and he still came in third. He's not advancing out of the primary. And so I think that this is something donors and candidates can understand. There's a problem, but the solution is very much not black and white. And you know, that's something I heard from different Democrats in this digital space as I was reporting this story and including from a progressive activist named Cheyenne Hunt, who was the former executive director of Gen Z for Change, which is a youth led online progressive group. And here's what she said when I asked her if she felt that the Democratic Party more broadly and, you know, Democrats more broadly were understanding the need to invest in this space. Here's how she put it.
- [15:11]
E
My observation is that most of the money is going to the creators who are all speaking in the same echo chamber and folks whose support we already had. And it's not going to like change hearts and minds.
- [15:24]
C
And you know, that can mean a bunch of things. But there she's talking about. We've seen the Democratic Party try to create a left leaning network of influencers as seen in certain right wing circles. When you think of Turning Point USA or PragerU, these places that have been like incubators for young conservatives to really gain followings and speak their mind. And there have been efforts on the Democratic side to kind of build up, you know, similar kind of ecosystems. But to some, like Hunt, they really want to see people invest. Democrats invest in apolitical spaces, in creators who maybe don't talk about politics every single day and have followings that, you know, maybe are not extremely politically wonky right now, but could be.
- [16:07]
B
That makes complete sense to me. Like this idea that if the audience is already self selecting that they like these issues or they're interested in these issues, that's not reaching new. The sort of new voters who that you might be thinking you are. That makes complete sense to me.
- [16:21]
C
Yeah. And there's multiple challenges here, right. Like not to discount politically active young people seeing campaigns, you know, to get back to piker's point. Like he wants his audience to get involved. And so there's several challenges. Speaking specifically about the Democratic Party right now that Democrats have, they need to re engage the young progressives and left leaning young people that they lost in 24 or were not excited to get out there. And then they also need to reach more people that are just not even in the same online space at all. Right.
- [16:51]
D
And we saw some measure of this engagement with non political creators, I guess we can call them in 2024 with the Trump campaign when he went on the tour of dude podcasts. Right. I mean if you listen to Joe Rogan, you're not hearing politics all the time. You're not even hearing politics a majority of the time, at least not directly. You're hearing, you know, people talk about aliens, you're hearing people talk about fitness and wellness, all that stuff. If you're listening to Theo Vaughn, you're hearing, you're hearing comedians, you're hearing any number of things. So if you already listen to those guys and then a politician swoops in and starts talking on that podcast, you might not have heard from that politician or cared about that politician or certainly not sat down to listen to 45 minutes or in the case of Rogan, two or three hours of that politician. Yeah. Until you sit down and listen to that. So yeah, the people who listen to or watch Hasan Piker. They're already quite politically engaged, one would guess. But the people who listen to Theo Vaughan, maybe not. And so that. That can be a very different space to engage with people.
- [18:02]
B
Yeah. And it feels like it's almost scratching two different itches where it's like, I understand if you go, if you're. If you're talking to a political influencer, you're probably that interview is going to be focused on your policies, the things you're interested in. But I was thinking about watching Zoram Mamdani talk to Adam Freeland on the Adam Free show, who's I would. I think is an. It's fair to say he's an influencer. He's a podcaster, right?
- [18:21]
C
Yeah. In the same big space.
- [18:22]
B
Yeah. I mean he. A lot of this just focused on like soccer and other things that like, I think politicians are constantly struggling for people to see them as human beings. And I, I guess I wonder about that other. Dipping your toe in those other spaces that aren't specifically political influencers. I feel like it's really helpful to try to build up your sort of like human credentials.
- [18:44]
C
Definitely.
- [18:45]
D
I think there's long been this kind of vibes. I guess we'll stick with that word about having a very online component to your campaign of going outside of quote unquote, traditional media, which is often also expensive media. And the sort of flavor that it gives your campaign is grassrootsy, is maybe populist is authentic, the word that we throw around in politics all the time. Like I think back to Obama 2008. He had a well funded campaign. He was the Democratic nominee. But one of the things that energized people so much, it was a sort of circular thing of he has a lot of online people. He's getting a lot of donations online. He's getting all these volunteers online. This must be a grassrootsy guy I can trust. He's not establishment. So maybe I'll volunteer for him and donate. And just went on and on and get your friends to volunteer and donate.
- [19:44]
B
Yeah. I feel like that between two Ferns episode with Galifianakis and Obama that like I'm like that. Actually that's exactly what we're talking about. That was like 15 years ago now. But that was a moment where he was in this medium that wasn't normally. I didn't think of those sort of Internet shorts as a place a politician would be. And it did probably do a lot to energize a certain population. Yeah.
- [20:05]
D
But one of the things Elaine is talking about here really complicates this, right? Because if you think of the influencers you watch as being authentic, as being themselves, if you find out they're being paid, then that is an entirely new veneer to lay over this whole thing. Right? Because if you see an ad on tv, it says, paid for by Kamala Harris for president, but you don't hear that from an influencer. And so now I wonder how complicated this space is going to be because it's largely unregulated. And so do people start to doubt influencers. I think this is all about to get much messier.
- [20:40]
C
Totally, totally. And it gets back to that word trust. You know, we should say young Americans today are disproportionately distrusting of institutions. They are skeptical of the government. They, many people tell me, you know, they've never seen a politician that, you know, delivers on what they've promised. And so the idea that there is trust in this space that is, is insanely unregulated and does have clear, you know, issues in how that trust comes across is very, very striking.
- [21:11]
B
Well, the last thing I want to bring up is the idea of political risk, because that's the other thing that when I think of people who have huge online followings, the people you've mentioned, whether it's Piker, whether it's Nick Fuentes, one of the common denominators to me is that these are people who push the boundaries, they say inflammatory things that is often rewarded in a lot of these online platforms. And I guess I wonder, Elena, how you think campaigns going forward are going to think about the political risk of engaging with some of these people, because either the possibility that they say something in their appearance that could be potentially controversial or just associating with some of these people could be potentially controversial.
- [21:50]
C
No. Yeah, you've definitely seen examples of candidates who get associated with controversial Internet figures. And I think that James Fishbach, the Republican running for governor in Florida, he's a far right candidate, he has courted a lot of that, you know, groiper vote that Nick Fuentes supporter vote of young Gen Z men and that association, maybe to some who, who support Fuentes, like Fuentes, could see that as a positive. But I think to a lot of people that is alienating, that is extremely, you know, offensive or, or divisive. And so there is a calculus and of course, an extreme example. But when you think about someone like Piker, who does have a, a record that of comments that some do find offensive or hurtful in regards to Israel or in regards to just US Policy around the war. That's something to consider. That said, when I talked to candidates like El Said who who campaigned with Piker, he told me everyday people, he argues, don't care about what someone else said who you stand with. He argued that if you share certain beliefs with someone, it doesn't mean you share all of their beliefs, which I thought was interesting. And he argues him and Piker agree on a lot of things around affordability, around access to quality health care, et cetera. And that's what they're going to talk about. So it is a political calculation. And I think it's again, goes back to this, like, authenticity of how much somebody is willing to kind of stand by what they believe and kind of defend their stance.
- [23:25]
B
All right. Well, we can leave it there for today. Alaina, thanks as always for explaining the Internet to me.
- [23:30]
C
Oh, my God, Miles. We're not that different in age.
- [23:33]
B
I'm Miles Parks. I cover voting.
- [23:36]
C
I'm Elena Moore. I cover politics.
- [23:38]
D
And I'm Danielle Kurtzleben. I cover the White House.
- [23:40]
B
And thank you for listening to the NPR Politics podcast. This is Eric Glass on this American Life. One thing we like is a good mystery sometimes about really big things. But most times the little mysteries are the best. Our lost and found is currently filled with pants.
- [24:04]
D
I don't know.
- [24:05]
E
I've never seen this happen.
- [24:07]
D
This is true.
- [24:08]
B
This is true. Mysteries of every size each week, this American Life.
- [24:13]
A
Wherever you get your podcasts, this message comes from U.S. bank. Simplify how you do business with Business Essentials, a powerful combination of no monthly maintenance fee, checking and card payment processing. Deposit products are offered by US Bank national association member FDIC.