Loading summary
A
You know this feeling. You see a news story during a busy workday and think, I'll catch up later. Make Consider this from NPR, part of your daily news diet. This week we break down the new Pentagon request for war funding, the US Nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia, and the
B
case against the Tate brothers.
A
Short episodes, clear takeaways every afternoon. Consider this listen on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
C
Members of Congress are racing to get out the door to start campaigning for the midterms. President Trump is already out on the campaign trail, even as his policies are creating political problems for his party. It's time for our weekly roundup of political news. So let's go. It's the NPR Politics Podcast. I'm Tamara Keith. I cover politics.
D
I'm Claudia De Salis. I cover Congress.
A
And I'm Deepa Shivaram. I cover the White House.
C
So, Claudia, the Republican led House narrowly passed a few items this week before leaving for the August recess. And I want to walk through some of them. So let's so let's start with this. On Wednesday, House Republicans passed a $95 billion budget resolution, which is the first step in the reconciliation process, which of course means you now need to explain what reconciliation is.
D
Right.
C
For the third time,
D
I forget. So totally. I need to remind myself, too. But basically, reconciliation is a way for the majority party to move a partisan bill without having to WOR about getting 60 votes in the Senate. So that's overcoming what we know as the filibuster. There are a lot of caveats to that. These need to have impacts on the budget in terms of whatever these changes are. And so it's going to be a tricky process. Even though the House was celebrating, they overcame a lot of hurdles and they made a lot of legislative wins by doing that and keeping their conference together for the most part. And this is one of the biggest ones because reconciliation 3.0 was very much in doubt for a very long time, especially after they had the first version last year, 1.0, which was known as the one big beautiful bill. They didn't think they could come back, but they did. And here we go.
C
Okay, so reconciliation 3.0. What is actually in this thing? What are they trying to do?
D
Well, this, and we should note, this is really an idea that's coming from House Republicans. It's got a long ways to go to see if the Senate will go along.
C
I think it's also coming from the White House.
D
Exactly.
A
Well, that's what I was gonna say. I mean, just to jump in here Briefly. I mean, this is like you said, the third time this process is happening. It happened with the big beautiful bill, like you mentioned. It happened with funding for dhs. This is like a larger process here of the President having a very specific agenda that he's trying to push with a lot of control over the Republican Party and Republicans in the House. Correct me if I'm wrong, Claudia, being like we're. This is the method we gotta use. And if it worked once, if it worked twice, it might work three times. And we're just gonna keep trying this.
D
Yeah, we're gonna keep pushing. And so unfortunately for House Republicans, they had the easy part. The kind of obstacles that reconciliation 3.0 could face in the Senate is, first, it needs to meet this threshold of having an impact on the budget. That comes down to the Senate parliamentarian. Second, where are Senate Republicans on all of this in terms of how they support each of these provisions in this legislation? For example, the SAVE act, that's going to be a big question mark. Some are not in favor of this. And finally, Democrats could force a lot of votes through this process. As we know, a vote a rama. And Republicans do not look forward to that in any way. So caveating all that, this is what is in the bill. Essentially there is $10 billion EAR marked for admin funding, another $60 billion for military and other related spending, 12 billion for agriculture, and 13 billion for intelligence related concerns. So $95 billion in total is what that bill is. And essentially what House Speaker Mike Johnson has said and other Republicans is it basically encompasses an emergency supplemental request from the Trump administration, from the Pentagon for about 70 billion to fund the Iran war. These are emergency costs that have come up that need to be addressed.
C
So just to give a little history here, normally when there is a war, the White House will come to Congress and say the military needs more money. And Congress in a bipartisan fashion, traditionally will step up and say, yes, this war is requires the support of the American people and it requires this funding and it passes as a bipartisan bill. The idea that this has to be passed through a partisan maneuver is really a break with norms and also a reflection, I think, of the lack of popularity of this war. This war did not get buy in from the American people. It certainly didn't get buy in from Democrats. It doesn't even fully have buy in from a lot of Republicans.
D
Exactly. And we heard that from the chair of Senate Appropriations Committee this week, Susan Collins of Maine, who by the way, is in a very tough reelection fight telling Pete hegseth the Defense Secretary was testifying this week that there still remains a lot of questions about the spending. And also, we heard concerns from other Republicans that this is not the path to approve appropriations for the military. Reconciliation is really a partisan vehicle to fulfill a party's hopes and dreams. For example, this vehicle also has elements of the Save America act, which would ramp up requirements for Americans when they go to the voting booth. So that's the focus that it should have in terms of policy impact. But when you talk about regular, appropriate military spending, this is not traditional in any way.
C
Yeah, I mean, the Affordable Care act was passed through this mechanism.
D
Exactly.
C
The one big, beautiful bill was passed through this mechanism. Funding a war through this mechanism.
A
I mean, just to. Yeah, like, thematically, it just kind of speaks to where our politics are at.
B
Right.
A
Like, the margins are so close, the numbers are so tight. The reason that, you know, bills have to pass this way is just looking at how specifically divided this Congress is. When you look at the agenda on Republicans and on Trump's side versus what Democrats are looking for, the Venn diagram is a very small overlap in this Congress in particular. And so the reason that, you know, bills aren't passing in a, quote, unquote, normal way, because this isn't really a normal Congress.
C
Yeah. And, Deepa, I just wanna key in a little bit more on this Save America act, which is something that President Trump has been pushing for, and now it is at least partially in this bill. It may not be able to stay in this bill in the Senate, but why is it that the president just keeps pushing this thing that the Senate Republicans in the Senate have made clear cannot pass?
A
I mean, look, this is a president who still believes that the 2020 election was stolen from him, which is not true. This is a president who he could be giving remarks about literally anything. It could be housing, it could be an economic, you know, agenda that he has, and he will somehow circle back to voter fraud complaints about the election system being broken and wanting to fix it through this act. And Trump has even posted on social media saying that he would even, you know, stop signing other pieces of legislation until Congress moved on the SAVE Act. So all of that to say there's a little bit of an obsession here with the president and passing this bill. Like Claudia said, I mean, this is not a small thing that he's asking Congress to pass. This would be a major overhaul of the way we ask people to go vote in this country. It would require more documents. It would require, you know, providing US Citizenship proof, like A passport or a birth certificate when they register to vote. These are hard things for regular people to do, to do something that we consider a very basic part of being an American citizen. So, anyway, just to say that is the context in all of this, as Trump is pushing and pushing and pushing for his party to move this legislation along, and you can understand on the Republican side of it in the Senate who are hesitant to move this along, this is a big ask. This changes a lot of things.
D
Exactly. And look at the clock. This law probably cannot take effect as President Trump would have probably have liked this year. Now, that's what I heard from Senate Republicans. Now that we're getting close to August, it's getting too late.
C
People are voting. People are voting in primaries. Early ballots will start going out very soon, like in September for the November election. So the election is here. Can we talk about one other dynamic, which is that, I mean, there was a thought that the House was going to have trouble passing some of these bills this week. Ultimately, they passed all of them. The way a bill becomes a law is it goes to the Senate. And in the Senate, it's like a brick wall over there for some of these agenda items.
D
Right? It's a brick wall in both directions. The House and the Senate increasingly are going in very different directions. And you can see it directly with the relationships with the president and leaders in each of those chambers. You can see Mike Johnson working through his conference with Trump's help. As we've mention, Trump is essentially the whip in the House. He gets those votes across the finish line time and time again. But when we look at Senate Majority Leader John Thune, his power comes from his Senate Republican conference, and he has to listen to them. And as the president takes aim at Republicans who have been forced out of their seats into lame duck periods of their terms because they were too moderate for the President, or what have you. Now, the president's frustration is clear with the Senate. He's taken aim at Thune increasingly. So when we talk about all of these legislative victories for the House, it's not clear that the Senate really can move very much of it. For example, reconciliation is very tough. Thune has been very skeptical about this, and again, he reflects what he hears from his conference. And then when we look at a continuing resolution that was passed, this is a stopgap funding measure to keep the government funded past the midterm term elections, to try and not worry about that. Thune says that's his focus. Perhaps he could use the reconciliation bill as a vehicle for that and then finally a national defense authorization bill was passed, which is usually a traditional annual bipartisan authorization for policy, for funding for the Pentagon. And the Senate's hopeful they could pass it. But there's still, again, a lot of challenges there. The House and the Senate, they're operating in very different ways.
B
All right.
C
We're going to take a quick break, and when we get back, President Trump hits the campaign trail.
E
This message comes from Vanta Risk and regulations are ramping up and customers now expect proof of security just to do business. Vanta automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk and customer trust together on one AI powered platform. So whether you're prepping for a SoC2 or running an enterprise GRC program, Vancea keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving. That's not just faster compliance. It's more time for growth. Get started@vancea.com this week on Here and Now. Anytime. Can a $25,000 pickup with crank windows change the game for American electric vehicles? We can design, engineer, assemble, all American, and it's affordable and it's something that people love. A Detroit startup says there's an appetite for bare bones EVs made in America. That story on Here and Now anytime. Listen on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. This season on Planet Money Summer School, we go to China, one of the world's biggest economies, and what we learned
D
is Americans are crazy, Chinese are crazy.
C
These are two countries full of these crazy hustlers.
E
The US And China are more alike than you might think. On Planet Money Summer School, a strange lesson about success, how to handle the downsides of progress. Listen on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
C
And we're back. And Deepa, the president this week attended the dignified transfer of four U.S. service members who were killed as part of the ongoing conflict with Iran. And then later that day, he went to Georgia and gave a campaign speech. What do you make of that? Split screen?
A
Yeah, I mean, keep in mind this week before the president went down to Georgia, Pete Hegseth, who's the defense secretary, said this week that the war has so far cost 37.5 billion. Pretty high price tag for a war that President Trump said was going to end months ago. And then President Trump goes down to Georgia and the Iran war comes up in his remarks and he's talking about high costs. And this is a president who for months now has been trying to mock the idea of affordability, saying that it's like this punchy term that Democrats came up with and he's saying, you know, there are some high costs right now, but they came down, but they're going to go down lower. And he's trying to sort of say, you know, it's not that big of a deal. Here's. Here's a bit of what he said.
F
And oil will be coming. It's going to be tumbling down. It was three weeks ago. They thought we had a deal. I said, I don't think we have a deal with these guys. They break every deal they make. But I said, you know, but people thought, the geniuses on Wall street, they came down, really down, and goes back up a little bit, but it's going to come down maybe lower than when we even started, but just give me a little time.
A
So he's saying, maybe lower. And this is an argument for Americans who have paid a lot of money with high prices, high gas prices, inflation high. This war has kept on a lot longer than they were told it was going to. And the president is saying, I need a little bit more time. It's just a really interesting setup when we know now how much this war has cost for this to be his message to voters.
C
A little more time for a war that he was calling an excursion.
A
Right.
C
That he was saying was over months ago.
A
Yeah, I thought it was interesting because he does keep making this parallel. I'm sure you've noticed this as well, where he talks about Venezuela and how successful US Operations in Venezuela were. That was when US Forces went in and captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. And now the White House argues that the US has benefited economically from this. There's not a lot of public information to back that up at this point, but that's the argument the administration is trying to make. And so in Georgia, one thing Trump said was that the operation in Venezuela essentially paid for itself over and over and over again. And you can see him trying to sort of reach at that argument with Iran and saying, like, it's a lot of money now when prices are really high, but, like, this is gonna be really worth it. The problem is, do Americans think that polling doesn't really seem to indicate that.
C
No polling and just talking to voters indicates that people don't have a lot of patience for this. I mean, I think certainly within his base, some patience, some patience. But every time you go fill up and gas is over $4 a gallon on the national average and climbing, with oil prices back up again, it's like, okay, what did we sign up for? Claudia? The House earlier this week passed a war powers resolution for the second time, this is a resolution that calls for removing U.S. forces from hostilities with Iran. It was symbolic, as these votes have been. But what does that say about how members of Congress are feeling about the current situation?
D
Well, it's clear there's increasing concerns about the direction of this war. And as we know, this war began in late February. The president said it was over weeks ago. And he says there's a new clock that started now with a new war. Democrats would argue that is a violation of the War Powers Act. And so this is part of what is fueling concerns for Democrats and even some Republicans. Republicans as well, are increasingly worried about the impact about the headwinds it's creating for them, especially on the campaign trail. It's hard for them to explain that away in terms of what they're seeing at the pomp. And especially as Depa was saying, the president said prices could very well go up again. That is yet another headache. And when you talk to Republicans who are worried about the campaign trail, they say that is one of the last things that is a thorn in their side, and they're worried about losing majorities in both chambers over this fight. So that's really what it symbolizes. It is symbolic because it's a concurrent resolution. So it doesn't have legal binding. It doesn't go to the president. And the House has approved one of these resolutions before. We saw the Senate follow up and approve it as well. But really, in the end, it's a message to the president, and they're hoping to ramp up the pressure to bring this conflict to an end.
C
You know, President Trump has said several times, and maybe this was a message mostly for the audience in Iran and not the audience in America. But he has said multiple times that the midterms are not weighing on how he handles the war with Iran, that he's not worried about the cost of things when he's deciding how to execute this war. He also just this week announced a whole new round of tariffs, which are another thing that that raised prices and have proven to be pretty unpopular with voters. I mean, like, what is he doing to his Republican Party? Oh, my gosh, he's not on the ballot. They are.
A
Yeah, I mean, I'll just briefly mention that there's a lot of tariffs going on. But one specific thing that happened at the White House this week is the president said he wanted to put tariffs on Canada again because of the wildfire smoke that has been, you know, trailing into the US and the White House
C
did ultimately announce tariffs against Canada. This week. But they cited a different reason and that was interesting.
A
Cuz pretty much immediately, you know, you mentioned Susan Collins earlier, Claudia, obviously, in a very tight Senate race. She basically immediately was like, ooh, I'm gonna put myself a little bit of a distance away from that comment. Like just putting all of these Republicans who once again to emphasize very close midterm elections going on, who are like, what, a hundred days away from facing the end of voting and you know, the president is making these remarks that you know, once again and over and over again, Republicans in these races have to be like, oh, but I don't with that. And it just sets up like, you know, for all of the attempts, I think, for Republicans in Congress to try and stand with Trump and Trump to try to like consolidate all of this Republican support, you see it just fraying in so many ways when he makes decisions like this and comments like that that literally force his party to break.
D
Exactly. It's just taking up so much oxygen for Republicans. This is definitely not something they would like to be talking about right now. For example, they want to talk about their eff to address affordability. They want to talk about provisions from the so called one big beautiful bill. And the administration did pass this landmark bipartisan housing bill that could have real impacts in various cities around the country in the years to come to create more affordability access. That's something that Republicans would love to be talking about, especially in these swing districts and these swing states where Americans are struggling. And for example, we've heard stats in terms of the gas prices, how much of a toll it has taken on American families. We saw that quoted this week during Hagseth's appearance before members. And it's in the tens of billions of dollars is what it's costing. And this is a study by Brown University that is tracking these costs. It comes down to about $550 per household that it is costing so far. So just imagine that amount is just going to continue to rise and impact all of these other issues. Grocery prices, fertilizer costs for farmers, all of that is getting impacted. It will continue. And the closer we get to the election, the more Americans are gonna remember that when they go to the ballot box.
A
Well, Tam, I mean, when you think about this, when you're thinking about the president wading into these competitive races, traveling to these states right where these races are happening. Georgia, he's going to Michigan next week. He's focusing on all these things like you mentioned that are so unpopular with voters. Iran, for example, the cost of Goods, for example, why is he doing this right ahead of the midterms?
C
Well, the theory of the case, and I did a story about this this week. The theory of the case that the president's team and Republicans have this year is that President Trump is a turnout machine, that President Trump gets voters to show up who are typically disengaged, who otherwise wouldn't vote. And he had a winning coalition in 2024, and they are trying to recreate that winning coalition a year that his name is not on the ballot. Now, I don't know that swing district Republicans have decided this, but President Trump, the rnc, all of these other big forces in Republican politics have decided to make this midterm about Trump, put him on the ballot, sort of metaphorically. And that means he's actually, I looked at the list of trips that he's made. He has campaigned with more than a dozen candidates in true toss up races. There are not that many true toss ups in this country. And he has been campaigning with those people, including Mike Lawlor in New York, who is considered one of the most endangered Republicans in the House. And yet there was Trump rallying with him. You know, it's, it's an, a very interesting theory and I guess we won't know the answer until later, but it is a total break with the norm, which is that. But when you have an unpopular president whose policies are underwater, whose approval rating is underwater, typically presidents are like, yep, I'm gonna stay away because I want you to win. And President Trump is instead, hey, buddy, let's hug. He's like, bringing them close. And, you know, I think that the big question here is if you were to get everyone who voted in 2024 to vote again in 2026, would they vote for Republicans? Would the same people who voted for Donald Trump vote for Republicans? Right now, after the last year and a half of the Trump administration, Democrats are betting no.
D
Yeah. Yeah. Republicans continue to tie their political fortunes to the president, even, as you say, he's not even on the ballot. And so we've seen him have control over primaries all across the country in terms of getting his endorsed candidates across the finish line. And, and the real test, however, I traveled to Texas and that's what I heard from Senator John Cornyn, who was not endorsed and lost that race, is that it's not clear that Ken Paxton, the candidate he endorsed there, is going to win the general election. Imagine Texas, a state that's been red for decades, is considered a potential for a flip in the Senate seat and has energized Democrats. So that's just one example of many of the president getting into a race that has potentially a lot of swing votes and betting that his political fortunes will get everyone across the finish line. But that remains to be seen.
C
Yeah, he's sort of a high water raises all boats. I don't. What is that?
A
Oh, a rising tide lifts all boats.
C
Yes, yes, yes.
D
He thinks he's the rising tide.
C
He does. He really does. That is the theory of the case.
A
Yeah.
C
All right. It's time for one more quick break and then we're gonna do Can't Let it Go.
A
These days it feels like the news changes every hour. Well, NPR has a podcast that does that too. NPR News now brings you a fresh five minute episode every hour of the day with the latest, most important headlines in episodes that are clear, fact based
B
and easy to digest.
A
Listen to NPR News now on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
B
Every episode of it's been a minute NPR's what's Happening in Culture podcast starts by asking asking three questions. Who? How? Why? Now? If the culture's asking it, we're talking about it at npr. We stand for your right to be curious and indulge your cultural curiosity. Follow It's Been a Minute wherever you get your podcasts and we'll break down the zeitgeist y topics that are filling your feed.
C
Waylyn, it seems like everything is being
E
called a recession indicator these days.
C
Yeah, like the box of Hamburger Helper in my pantry or the new Apple Neo book or the resurgence of press
A
on new nails or lipstick or no lipstick. I've lost track.
F
There is only one way to know
C
if these are actual economic warning signs, though.
D
Listen to the indicator from Planet Money on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
C
And we're back. And it's time to end the show like we do every week with Can't Let It Go, the part of the pod where we talk about the things from the week that we just cannot stop thinking about politics or otherwise. Claudia, you go first.
D
Well, I am dealing with a post World cup hangover depression. I feel so lost what to do with myself. I got so caught up. I'm not that much of a big soccer football fan, but I did get caught up in all of the excitement, especially at the end. Like those last few games when I walked into the house, my family was watching. I was like, I don't care, I don't care. And I stood there for a second one of the third to last matches For Argentina. And my family asked me, who are you rooting for? I said, Argentina. And so I'm standing in this position in the living room. And that's when they finally scored for the first time in the game. And I realized, oh my God, I'm helping Argentina right now. I need to carry them all the way through. I have to stand in this every time because for me, I'm such a massive fan of the Goat of Messi. And it's just, I don't want him to go away. It's just an amazing, you know, player and a legend. And so that's where I got caught up. And it happened again and again and again. I kid you not, guys, I was getting them to the World Cup, I'm sure of it. And then the World cup came and I just, I had to leave the living room for a little while and that was it.
C
I mean, nothing happened in that game that was good for Messi or Art Argentina.
D
Exactly. And then at the end of the game, they misbehaved and I was like, okay, go Spain, you deserved it.
A
I was rooting hardcore for Spain. I wasn't rooting for Spain, actually. I was rooting for a number of different teams. And then finally, then it was Spain and I was just like, well, I've, I've always been a fan of, I've famously always been a fan of Spain, my favorite team. So I think it turns us into all delusional fans of just like, you know, some degree or the other.
C
Fair weather fan.
A
I love it. I love it. I equally love the World Cup. It's the best. I'm a huge fan of soccer. I played soccer as a kid. I think you did, yeah. Just like to be abundantly clear, like baby wreck soccer. Like there was nothing grand happening about my skills, but it was such a great sport and, and I'm hoping, fingers crossed, you guys maybe try to make it to Brazil for the Women's World cup next year.
C
Fingers crossed.
D
We're going to manifest this.
A
Yeah, I like you manifested for your team, Argentina. You must manifest this for me.
D
We will. It's done.
C
Manifest your. Well, I just hope to have time to watch it on tv. Okay, I'm gonna go next. And my can't let it go is that I have started taking bass lessons. Bass guitar. I played in middle school and high school and I was in several bands.
A
Very cool.
C
And I have forgotten literally everything. The skills I thought I had are gone. But my son has been playing guitar and taking guitar lessons and now I have scheduled a Bass lesson at the same time as his guitar lesson.
A
Oh, my gosh.
C
And I had my second lesson last night, and I have a lot of work to do.
A
That is really cool.
D
I love it. Could you form a family band?
C
We could form. We could form a family band.
D
See, you're on your way.
A
Yeah. This is smart.
C
Because my young son has big.
D
Oh, there we go.
C
Big frontman energy.
A
I was gonna say I manifest in addition to making it to Brazil, obviously, I'm manifesting, like, Tam's second career being.
D
That's right.
A
Like, should we change the music of the politics podcast and make it Tam's family band? Well, first.
C
First I should figure out what notes are what strings, because I am, like, I am in a. Like, I haven't done something really hard that I'm really bad at. I love that part in a really long time.
A
What a great process for your brain.
C
Yeah. Yes. I. I mean, at one point, I was like, it feels like I'm trying to tap my head and rub my tummy because my left hand and my right hand are supposed to be doing different things at the same time. That's awful. Like, this could. This could be good for brain health.
A
What a cool thing, though. I played clarinet growing up, and I feel like I. I remember how to put it together, and I remember how to hold it. After that, I. I don't know if I would remember what to do. So it's really cool to, like, kind of bring back, like, I don't know, kind of the riding the bike energy. Maybe you never forget something.
D
Memory again.
C
I. I have forgotten. But I'm gonna.
A
I am gonna do lesson number three is coming, Tam, you got this.
D
Exactly. And I'm dying for the family band name, so please.
A
Oh, yeah, keep us posted.
B
Come back.
D
It's gonna be good.
C
So good. One of my bands in high school was called Spamicide, so hopefully we'll come up with something better for the family band. Spamicide is truly one of the worst band names ever. All right, Deepa, what can't you let go of?
A
Okay, so caveat here. I have not seen the Odyssey yet, so no spoilers.
D
No spoilers.
A
No spoilers.
C
Nope.
A
To be abundantly clear, seen this movie. I want to see it in imax. So at this point, I'm not going to see it until November because everything is so booked up. Tam and I were talking about this yesterday.
C
I've been trying to book tickets, and it's like, well, unless you want to sit in the front row. I, like, I keep going weeks and Weeks and weeks, apparently.
A
I was not. I was not on my game and trying to book these tickets. So anyway, it's going to be a minute before I see the movie, but obviously the press tour has been popping off. And one clip that I saw that I'm really obsessed with is that Matt Damon was talking about how one of his stunt doubles in the movie, in this really critical scene is a woman.
C
Oh.
A
And I am so obsessed with this. I looked her up. Her name is Devin Dalton. She's a Canadian actor, stunt performer. She, like, has done a lot of movies before, and she's got these freaking awesome arms. And speaking of second careers potentially for you, Tam, I don't know. I mean, I've been hitting the gym a little bit lately. I've never hit the gym before in my life. Life, but we're working on it. And my arms, they have muscles where there weren't muscles before.
C
I have, like, a little tricep definition. And I'm just saying, after years of trying to get just a tiny bit of tricep definition.
A
No, we're like, we're trying. Women should be lifting weights.
C
I'm not going to definition.
A
Etcetera, etc, etcetera. We can go on and on. However, I'm just thinking, if Christopher Nolan is looking out, if Matt Damon is looking for, like, maybe a future stunt double, I could keep working at it. And I want to get to Devin Dalton's level.
D
That's right.
A
I want Odyssey level arms. That's what we want.
D
It's gonna happen.
C
I think that we set our goals more realistically. No.
D
We can manifest this. No.
A
You can learn bass guitar. And I'm gonna be a stunt double.
D
That's right.
C
May we do one of those things?
A
A girl can dream.
C
A girl can dream.
D
Girl can.
C
All right, that's a wrap for today. Our executive producer is Mathani Muturi. Our editor is Rachel Bay. Our producers are Casey Morel and Bria Suggs. Special thanks to Ben Swayze and Dana Farrington. I'm Tamara Keith. I cover politics.
D
I'm Claudia Grizales. I cover Congress.
A
And I'm Deepa Shivaram. I cover the White House.
C
And thank you for listening to the NPR Politics podcast.
B
Oh, hey there. I'm Brittany Luce, and I don't know, maybe this is a little out of pocket to say, but I think you should listen to my podcast. It's called It's Been a Minute, and I love it. And I think you will, too. Over the past couple months, over 100,000 new listeners started tuning in find out why. Listen to the It's Been a Minute podcast from NPR are today.
E
The midterms are coming, and if you think the news cycle feels intense now, just wait until the fall. That's why summer is a perfect time to make sure your news diet is calibrated. I'm Ian Martinez. On Up first we unpack the three biggest stories every morning so you can stay informed and get on with your day in fewer than 15 minutes. Follow or subscribe up first today wherever you get podcasts this message comes from a US Bank. Simplify how you do business with Business Essentials, a powerful combination of no monthly maintenance fee checking and card payment processing. Deposit products are offered by US Bank national association member FDIC.
This episode focuses on how former President Trump’s ongoing policy agenda and leadership style continue to shape and complicate the political landscape for Republicans ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The episode covers legislative maneuvering on Capitol Hill, deep divisions within the Republican Party, the unpopular Iran war, and the ripple effects of Trump's hands-on campaigning on vulnerable GOP candidates.
(00:24–03:03)
"Basically, reconciliation is a way for the majority party to move a partisan bill without having to worry about getting 60 votes in the Senate. That's overcoming what we know as the filibuster." (01:19)
Key Segment: Context of the $95B Bill
"The idea that this has to be passed through a partisan maneuver is really a break with norms and also a reflection, I think, of the lack of popularity of this war." (04:39)
(07:06–08:52)
"This is a president who still believes that the 2020 election was stolen from him, which is not true... he will somehow circle back to voter fraud complaints... and wanting to fix it through this act." (07:33)
(09:05–11:36)
(13:03–15:45)
"And oil will be coming. It's going to be tumbling down... but it's going to come down maybe lower than when we even started, but just give me a little time." (14:06)
(15:45–17:59)
"Republicans... are increasingly worried about the impact about the headwinds it's creating for them, especially on the campaign trail... they're worried about losing majorities in both chambers over this fight." (16:30)
(17:59–19:53)
"It just sets up, for all the attempts... to stand with Trump and Trump to try to consolidate... support, you see it just fraying... when he makes decisions like this and comments like that that literally force his party to break." (19:02)
(19:53–21:16)
(21:16–24:52)
"President Trump is a turnout machine... he had a winning coalition in 2024... they're trying to recreate that... [but] it is a total break with the norm." (21:37)
"The Venn diagram is a very small overlap in this Congress in particular... this isn't really a normal Congress." (A, 06:40)
"A rising tide lifts all boats." (A & C, 24:43)
"...Brown University... is tracking these costs... about $550 per household that it is costing so far. So just imagine that amount is just going to continue to rise..." (D, 20:50)
(26:10–33:04)
Panelists share personal stories—post-World Cup blues, learning bass guitar, and a crush on Matt Damon’s stunt double. These lighthearted segments provide relief from the heavy political analysis and reinforce camaraderie among hosts.
This episode provides a sharp lens on the complex interplay between Trump’s ambitions and the day-to-day realities of Republican lawmakers as they brace for a challenging midterm election season.