Inside Trump's Tax And Spending Law: Medicaid Cuts & A 'Backdoor Abortion Ban'

Summary

Summary of "Inside Trump's Tax And Spending Law: Medicaid Cuts & A 'Backdoor Abortion Ban'"

Podcast Information:

• Title: The NPR Politics Podcast
• Host/Author: NPR
• Episode: Inside Trump's Tax And Spending Law: Medicaid Cuts & A 'Backdoor Abortion Ban'
• Release Date: July 8, 2025

---

Introduction

In this episode of The NPR Politics Podcast, hosts Ashley Lopez and Deirdre Walsh delve into the implications of President Trump's recently signed tax cut and spending law, focusing on its impact on Medicaid, healthcare, and reproductive rights. Health correspondent Kadia Riddle joins the discussion to provide expert insights on the legislative changes and their broader consequences.

---

Medicaid Cuts and Implementation

The centerpiece of the new law involves substantial cuts to Medicaid, projected to save nearly $1 trillion over the next decade. Kadia Riddle explains, “[02:05] the Congressional Budget Office is saying that the cut will save close to $1 trillion. And one of the primary ways they'll be realizing these savings is through increasing the demands around paperwork and the work requirements.”

Under the new provisions, most states will require Medicaid recipients to volunteer or work 80 hours per month. This shift imposes significant administrative burdens, particularly for individuals engaged in gig economy jobs who may struggle to document their work hours. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in losing Medicaid coverage.

Previous State Experiments

Kadia highlights past implementations in Arkansas and Georgia as cautionary tales. In Arkansas, the introduction of additional paperwork and work requirements led to “a lot of administrative hassle and confusion” ([02:57]). Many recipients lacked the necessary computer literacy or internet access to comply, resulting in widespread disenrollment. Similarly, Georgia's ongoing program has exceeded administrative cost expectations, spending more on bureaucracy than on actual healthcare services ([03:54]).

---

Impact on Healthcare Beyond Medicaid

The Medicaid cuts extend beyond the program itself, affecting the broader healthcare system. Kadia points out that the Biden administration had significantly bolstered the Affordable Care Act (ACA), making insurance more affordable. However, the new law withdraws this extra funding, making insurance acquisition more challenging and potentially leading to millions losing coverage ([04:05]).

Deirdre Walsh adds that these changes will particularly strain rural hospitals, which depend heavily on Medicaid funding. “[04:50] These cuts threaten the financial viability of rural hospitals, impacting not just Medicaid recipients but also individuals reliant on private insurance who may find it difficult to access urban medical centers.”

---

Political Reactions and Campaign Implications

The legislation has ignited political battles, especially as the midterm elections approach. Democrats are leveraging the Medicaid cuts to target Republican lawmakers, particularly those in swing districts. Deirdre Walsh notes that “Democrats in both the House and the Senate were targeting Republicans who represent swing districts… focusing on the impact on rural hospitals and the millions potentially losing health insurance” ([06:18]).

Conversely, Republicans are emphasizing the economic benefits of the bill, such as “no tax on tips and no tax on overtime,” aiming to appeal to supporters who benefited from these changes ([07:42]).

Effectiveness of Political Messaging

An unnamed political analyst suggests that while it is early to predict the effectiveness of these campaign strategies, historical precedents like the 2018 midterms indicate that focusing on healthcare issues can be a decisive factor for voter sentiment ([08:01]).

---

Planned Parenthood Provision and Abortion Access

A controversial aspect of the law targets organizations like Planned Parenthood. Kadia Riddle elaborates, “[10:10] the law… makes it illegal for states to make Medicaid payments to nonprofits that offer abortion and receive more than $800,000 in federal funding.” Although the law does not explicitly mention Planned Parenthood, the implications are significant.

Planned Parenthood has secured a temporary injunction against this provision, labeling it a “backdoor abortion ban.” By threatening clinics that provide comprehensive reproductive health services, the provision endangers access to abortion even in states where it remains legal. Kadia cites an attorney for Planned Parenthood in Wisconsin, who stated that “200 clinics across the country are now in jeopardy” ([10:10]).

---

SNAP Program Changes

The new law also introduces modifications to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), focusing on work requirements similar to those in Medicaid. Deirdre Walsh explains how negotiations with Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska influenced these changes: “[11:57] initially, the bill required parents of young children to be exempt from work requirements, but Murkowski advocated for raising the age to 14 and adjusting state-specific requirements to address Alaska's high error rates.”

These adjustments highlight how individual state concerns can shape national policy, potentially encouraging other states to seek similar exemptions and undermining the Republican objective of reducing program waste through standardized work requirements ([13:55]).

---

Analysis on the Effectiveness of the Legislation

The overarching goal of the tax and spending law is to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse within federal assistance programs. However, as Deirdre Walsh points out, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the Medicaid cuts will result in approximately 12 million people losing their health coverage, which far exceeds typical waste reduction ([14:44]).

The belief that these measures will streamline Medicaid to better serve its intended low-income and disabled populations is countered by the reality that the expansions under the ACA popularized Medicaid among a broader demographic. This broad appeal complicates Republican claims that the cuts are merely targeting inefficiency, as millions who depend on Medicaid for essential healthcare will be adversely affected ([15:55]).

---

Conclusion

The episode underscores the far-reaching consequences of President Trump's tax and spending law, particularly regarding Medicaid, healthcare accessibility, and reproductive rights. While proponents argue that the legislation targets inefficiencies, the substantial projected losses in coverage and the challenges of implementing stricter requirements suggest a more profound impact on millions of Americans. The political fallout from these changes is already shaping campaign strategies ahead of the 2026 midterms, highlighting the deep divisions and critical stakes involved.

---

Notable Quotes:

• Kadia Riddle ([02:05]): “The Congressional Budget Office is saying that the cut will save close to $1 trillion. And one of the primary ways they'll be realizing these savings is through increasing the demands around paperwork and the work requirements.”

• Deirdre Walsh ([06:18]): “Democrats in both the House and the Senate were targeting Republicans who represent swing districts… focusing on the impact on rural hospitals and the millions potentially losing health insurance.”

• Kadia Riddle ([10:10]): “Planned Parenthood has become known as a provider of abortion care, but it also provides a lot of other basic reproductive health care things like cancer screening, birth control, STI testing… it's a backdoor abortion ban.”

• Deirdre Walsh ([14:44]): “The changes to Medicaid are expected to generate nearly a trillion dollars in cuts… an estimated 12 million people losing their health care coverage because of the changes in this.”

---

This comprehensive summary encapsulates the critical discussions and insights from the episode, providing a clear understanding of the legislative changes and their implications for healthcare and political dynamics in the United States.

Transcript

[NPR Sponsor]

Support for npr and the following message come from Indeed. You just realized your business needed to hire someone yesterday. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed. Claim your $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility@ Indeed.com NPR terms and conditions apply.

This message comes from Ritual. What makes Ritual Vitamins different? Ritual vitamins are made with bio available clinically studied key ingredients and a patented nutrient delivery system that aims help your body use the nutrients you're getting. Ritual's essential multivitamins are made with you and your body in mind and backed by scientific research, filled with key ingredients as well as the essence of mint so you can enjoy taking your vitamins. Get 25% off your first purchase when you visit ritual.com NPR hi, this is.

[Megan]

Megan in Hartford, Connecticut. I'm walking out of my last supervised shift as a pediatric emergency medicine fellow doctor after 11 years of medical training.

[Ashley Lopez]

This podcast was recorded at 1:05pm Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 8, 2025.

[Megan]

Things may have changed by the time you hear this, but I will be thoroughly enjoying some time off before starting back here as a pediatric emergency medicine attending doctor at the same hospital where I was a patient as a child and the place that helped inspire me to become a pediatrician. Enjoy the show.

[Ashley Lopez]

Oof. That's a big job.

[Deirdre Walsh]

That's so cool, though.

[Ashley Lopez]

Yeah, very cool. Congratulations. Hey there, it's the NPR Politics podcast. I'm Ashley Lopez. I cover politics.

[Deirdre Walsh]

I'm Deirdre Welsh. I cover Congress.

[Ashley Lopez]

And NPR health correspondent Kadia Riddle is here. Welcome to the pod. Katia, hi.

[Kadia Riddle]

Thanks for having me.

[Ashley Lopez]

And today we're taking a look at how the big tax cut and spending bill President Trump recently signed into law will affect health care. Kadia, there's been a lot of focus on cuts and changes to Medicaid. This is the government program that provides health insurance to people who are low income or have disabilities. Can you tell me what exactly is happening to the program?

[Kadia Riddle]

Yeah. So the Congressional Budget Office is saying that the cut will save close to $1 trillion. And one of the primary ways they'll be realizing these savings is through increasing the demands around paperwork and the work requirements. Most states will now require that people volunteer or work 80 hours a month. Proving that can be onerous, though if you're balancing a bunch of different gig economy jobs, for example, it may be difficult to document the number of hours worked, especially if you just have to keep doing that frequently. So if people fail to do that, then they will be kicked off the program.

[Ashley Lopez]

So, Katia, some states have already experimented with things like additional Medicaid work requirements and more paperwork. How did those experiments fare in states that took them up?

[Kadia Riddle]

Yeah, so as you said, you know, this is an experiment that we've run before on a smaller scale in several states. Arkansas and Georgia are two of the states that have tried this. In both of those places, we've seen a lot of administrative hassle and confusion. For example, in Arkansas, it was difficult just to reach and find all the people that they needed to to inform them of these changes. And then once they did find them, many people didn't have the computer literacy that they needed or the access to the Internet in order to comply with the. The program and file all the paperwork that they needed to. In Georgia, the program is ongoing and it has ended up costing the state a lot of money. Significantly more per patient than they were expecting, and they've spent just more on administration than they have on healthcare.

[Ashley Lopez]

Yeah. And I wanna talk about how these cuts would affect healthcare in general. We're talking about the Medicaid cuts here. Like, how would this affect people who maybe aren't even part of that program?

[Kadia Riddle]

Yeah. You know, the Biden administration really pumped a lot of money into the Affordable Care act health insurance, and it made it more affordable than it had been in the past. So this law takes away that extra funding, and it's also going to make it harder to actually get the insurance. You know, people generally just don't like to think about their health insurance. They. They want it to be there for them when they're sick by increasing the administrative burdens or increasing the price. That is just going to make it more difficult for people to get it and then to use it when they need it. The CBO says millions of people, as a result of these changes, will lose their health insurance.

[Deirdre Walsh]

I think the other thing that's worth noting here, too, is that Republicans structured this so that a lot of the changes to Medicaid, both to people who are eligible and the work requirements and the way states finance their own Medicaid programs in partnership with the federal government. Medicaid as a state. Federal partnership. And states rely on provider taxes to help them sort of increase the amount of money they get from the federal government to cover Medicaid programs. This issue, a lot of lawmakers worry, will have a particular impact on rural hospitals because those states rely more on the sort of existing system that helps those states get a certain amount of money from the federal government that's going to be cut because of the changes in this new law. And although those don't go into effect until 2028, there is still some concerns about the financial viability of rural hospitals and what that means for anyone seeking care. Right. It's not just people on Medicaid that to rural hospitals, it's people on private insurance who can't drive a couple of hours to get to more urban medical centers.

[Kadia Riddle]

Yeah.

[Ashley Lopez]

I mean, and even though, like, the bulk of these cuts to Medicaid don't take effect for a little while, we are already seeing Democrats, you know, starting to campaign on this issue. Deidre, what are you seeing so far from Democrats?

[Deirdre Walsh]

Right. I mean, even before the votes on these bills, just throughout the debate, Democrats in both the House and the Senate were targeting Republicans who represent swing districts. Republicans in Senate races this year about the Republican bill focusing on getting a lot of the savings from the Medicaid program and what that would mean for people in their districts. And this week, we're starting to see some of the actual political ads. Both the campaign arms for Democrats in the House and the Senate have released digital ads in the last couple of days that target Republicans who voted for these bills. A lot of the ads in the House districts focused on lawmakers and the impact on rural hospitals. Some of the Senate focused ads are more on, you know, sort of numbers of people in those states that could be impacted by Medicaid. And I think Republicans on the flip side are really trying to explain the benefits of the bill because so much of the debate was like, oh, the split inside the Republican Party on Medicaid. And now I think they're trying to get out and educate people about the things in the bill, like no tax on tips, no tax on overtime that will potentially boost certain people that supported Trump.

[Ashley Lopez]

Yeah, I wonder how effective that's gonna be considering that more than 78 million Americans are enrolled in either Medicaid or CHIP, the Children's Health Insurance programs. I mean, how effective will that be for Republicans to sort of like the look over here approach? Because this is a lot of Americans who could potentially be affected by these cuts.

[Unnamed Political Analyst]

I mean, I think it's kind of early to predict or to speculate, you know, how effective ads will be. I mean, the midterm elections are not till November of 2026, but, I mean, I think you could look back at the 2018 midterm after Republicans had a trifecta and controlled both chambers of Congress and Trump was president, where there was an effort to repeal the Affordable Care act, ultimately didn't pass, But Democrats campaigned on that issue and won back control of the House.

[Ashley Lopez]

All right, we're going to take a quick break. More in a moment.

[NPR Sponsor]

Support for this podcast and the following message come from Made in Cookware president and co founder Jake Kalik shares a tool that's useful for both master and newbie griller.

The craftsmanship of the carbon steel griddle enhances your grilling experience because it allows you a totally different type of grill surface that opens up the amounts of food you're able to cook. So the griddle is the perfect accessory to add to your grill and kind of widen your grilling game.

Learn more about Made in Cookware at M a d e I-ncookware.com the House of Representatives has approved a White House request to claw back two years of previously approved funding for public media. The rescissions package now moves on to the Senate. This move poses a serious threat to local stations and public media as we know it. Please take a stand for public media [e-mail] thank you.

[Eric Glass]

This is Eric Glass on this American Life. Sometimes we just show up somewhere, turn on our tape recorders and see what happens. If you can't get seven cars in 12 days, you gotta look yourself in the mirror and say, holy crap. What, are you kidding me? This car dealership trying to sell its monthly quota of cars and it is not going well. I just don't want one balloon to a car. Balloon the whole freaking place. So it looks like a circus. Real life stories every week.

[Ashley Lopez]

And we're back.

[Deirdre Walsh]

Katia.

[Ashley Lopez]

One of the law's provisions specifically targets Planned Parenthood. The organization just won a temporary injunction against that provision from taking effect for two weeks. But can you explain to me, like, what that provision does?

[Deirdre Walsh]

Yeah.

[Kadia Riddle]

So the law, it doesn't actually say the words Planned Parenthood, but it makes it illegal for states to make Medicaid payments to nonprofits that offer abortion and receives more than $800,000 in federal funding. I want to lay this out clearly because it gets confusing. It is already illegal to use federal funds to pay for abortions in all but a few extreme circumstances. So what this provision does is it disallows for providers who offer abortion to take Medicaid for any reason. Planned Parenthood has become known as a provider of abortion care, but it also provides a lot of other basic reproductive health care things like cancer screening, birth control, STI testing. So two things. One, it threatens clinics that provide this basic care. Many are in rural parts of the country. Planned Parenthood is warning that 200 clinics across the country are now in jeopardy. And two, by closing these clinics. Clinics or potentially closing them, it ends access to abortion even in states where the procedure is legal. I spoke last week to an attorney for Planned Parenthood in Wisconsin. There are 21 Planned Parenthood clinics across that state. And she called this a, quote, backdoor abortion ban. You know, in theory, Planned Parenthood could still receive Medicaid payments if it stopped providing abortion, but the organization has said vehemently that it will never stop. Yeah.

[Ashley Lopez]

I also want to talk about snap. This is also one of the changes that Congress made. This was the focus of some negotiations that ultimately helped get Alaska's Republican Senator, Lisa Murkowski, to vote for the bill. Can you explain what changed as they got Murkowski on board?

[Deirdre Walsh]

So, like Medicaid, Republicans, in terms of trying to get some savings, added new work requirements to SNAP requirements for people enrolled in the program to demonstrate that they're trying to get a job working or in a job training program or educational program in order to qualify for the program. Murkowski, who represents Alaska, made the case to Republican leaders, really at the 9th hour, 10th hour, I don't know, the middle of night, whenever those negotiations took place, that Alaska has traditionally had a very high error rate in terms of snap people applying to the program, being in the program, and that parents of.

[Unnamed Political Analyst]

Children need to be in the program for older children. Right.

[Deirdre Walsh]

Initially, the bill that came over from.

[Unnamed Political Analyst]

The House had a requirement that, you know, parents of young children were exempted from these requirements, but once their kids got older, they needed to meet these work requirements. Murkowski made the case that the age needed to be 14 and over. She made the case that it's much harder for parents in Alaska to have childcare to be able to meet those work requirements. So they change the age, they change the state requirements for what kind of paperwork they needed to be able to submit. And it just shows you that how much, you know, the narrow concerns of one state's program can impact what's going to happen nationally. Because by changing these and allowing a state with a higher error rate to still get some kind of carve out, it's almost an incentive for other states to not be as diligent about some of these paperwork requirements because they'll also just say, we need more time.

[Deirdre Walsh]

And that sort of defeats the Republican aim in the bill, which was we're adding all these requirements to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse, to streamline the program for people who are most deserving of these federal assistance programs.

[Kadia Riddle]

So the SNAP cuts work by changing the work requirements and eligibility for people to qualify. One change specifically is around age. It used to be that the work requirements applied to people 54 and younger, but they've changed that to 64 specifically for snap eligibility.

[Ashley Lopez]

Yeah. So, Deirdre, I mean, you kind of got to this a little bit. But, you know, President Trump has said that these cuts are about reducing waste, fraud and abuse in these programs. I mean, do you think this legislation is actually likely to accomplish that goal?

[Deirdre Walsh]

I mean, I think the reason why Republicans and the president keep focusing on that is because the president made a very specific campaign promise that no one was going to touch Medicaid, that people weren't going to be cut. And they focus on the changes to the program being only waste, fraud and abuse. But as we've seen from the independent Scorekeeper, the Congressional Budget Office, the changes to Medicaid are expected to generate nearly a trillion dollars in cuts. That is more than you could get from waste, fraud and abuse. That is from what CBO says is an estimated 12 million people losing their health care coverage because of the changes in this. So, you know, I think the other political argument that Republicans have been making about the changes to Medicaid, essentially financing the tax cuts in this bill is that they are trying to focus on keeping Medicaid focused on the people that it was originally intended for, low income, disabled elderly. But as we talked about earlier, when Obamacare passed, there was a huge increase.

[Unnamed Political Analyst]

To the numbers of people getting health care through Medicaid in the states.

[Deirdre Walsh]

And a lot of people like their health care.

[Unnamed Political Analyst]

The program is popular. It's not just low income elderly, disabled. It's a lot of, you know, people who can't get health insurance through their jobs and are getting it through state exchanges.

[Kadia Riddle]

Yeah.

[Ashley Lopez]

Different political matter. Giving benefits as opposed to taking it away.

[Deirdre Walsh]

Yeah.

[Ashley Lopez]

All right. Let's leave it there for today. Kadia, thanks so much for joining us today.

[Kadia Riddle]

Thanks for having me.

[Ashley Lopez]

I'm Ashley Lopez. I cover politics.

[Deirdre Walsh]

I'm Deirdre Walsh. I cover Congress.

[Ashley Lopez]

And thank you for listening to the NPR Politics podcast.

[Eric Glass]

You know, those things you shout at the radio or maybe even at this very NPR podcast on NPR's Wait, Wait, don't tell me we actually say those things on the radio and on the podcast. We're rude across all media. We think the news can take it. Listen to NPR's Wait, Wait, don't tell me. Wherever you get your podcasts at Planet Money, we know that economic jargon can.

[Kadia Riddle]

Sometimes feel like speaking another language.

[NPR Sponsor]

Yeah.

[Unnamed Political Analyst]

Like arbitrage, alpha, otarchy that's just what's.

[Eric Glass]

In the news these days. There's also absolute advantage.

[Kadia Riddle]

Aggregate demand, aggregate supply.

[Unnamed Political Analyst]

And this is just the A's.

[NPR Sponsor]

Oh, animal spirits.

[Ashley Lopez]

That's a pretty good one.

[NPR Sponsor]

Planet Money from npr.

[Ashley Lopez]

We help you translate the economy so you can understand the world.

[Unnamed Political Analyst]

Wherever you get your podcasts, you're listening.

[Eric Glass]

To NPR because you're curious. You want to know what the world is like beyond the surface. NPR feeds that curiosity with stories from real people, with real experiences and all the perspectives that come with them. It's our right to be curious and our prerogative to listen. So keep your curiosity alive. Hear the bigger picture every day on npr.