Loading summary
Progressive Insurance
This message comes from Progressive Insurance, where drivers who switch could save hundreds on car insurance. Get your quote@progressive.com today. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates.
Susan Davis
Hey there. It's the NPR Politics podcast. I'm Susan Davis. I cover politics.
Greg Myhre
I'm Greg Myy, and I cover national security.
Mara Liasson
And I'm Mara Liasson, senior national political correspondent.
Susan Davis
And today on the show, we're gonna look back at President Biden's foreign policy record. Mara, I want to start with a big picture thought here. Former President Donald Trump's first term marked a very clear shift in American foreign policy. He said the US Was spending way too much to help defend allies, and the policy should move to what we now know as, quote, america first policy. When Biden won in 2020, he tried to rebuild and add to those alliances. Did he succeed?
Mara Liasson
I think in large part he did, although the story of Biden's foreign policy I think could be titled TBD because we don't know how a lot these foreign policy efforts are going to work out. But he certainly rebuilt the Western alliance, NATO, this is a organization of democratic countries, the United States and Canada and Europe, that Donald Trump had belittled and derided and threatened to pull out of. And Biden did rebuild those alliances, and he kept the Western alliance together to support Ukraine. He's had some criticism that he didn't send Ukraine enough lethal weapons fast enough, but there's no doubt that he was a staunch supporter of Ukraine. And that's a big contrast to Donald Trump, who had a longtime animus towards Ukraine and a lot of sympathy for Vladimir Putin. And, of course, famously, incoming Vice President J.D. vance said, I don't care what happens.
Susan Davis
To Ukraine, Greg, I think it's worth looking back at some of the biggest moments in foreign policy in the Biden administration. And I think we should start with Afghanistan. He came into office saying he wanted to end US Involvement in the war there, but that also led to the first foreign policy crisis of his administration. How did that play out?
Greg Myhre
Yeah, so Biden had been the vice president during the Afghan war for many years, and, you know, he believed it was time for the US to leave. After 20 years, the war was really dragging on with little change on the battlefield. So he announced the plan to pull out in the spring of 2021. He'd just been in office a couple months. And the US Military did leave in an orderly fashion in July of that year. But, sue, here's a caveat. Many Afghans who were eligible to leave didn't leave or couldn't leave when the US Military did. You know, some were Afghans who had dual US Citizenship and they took this sort of wait and see approach. Others were Afghans who'd worked with the Americans and were promised US Visas but couldn't get their paperwork processed in time. So when the Taliban surged across the country and seized Kabul, this led to the chaotic events everyone remembers. In August of 2021, the military returned to the Kabul airport. Afghans were hanging onto military planes as they taxied down the Runway. There was a suicide bombing that killed 13American troops at the gates of the airport. So the US ultimately evacuated about 125,000 Afghans. But that's certainly not what people remember or focus on, Mario.
Susan Davis
I mean, it's also worth remembering that that wasn't exactly entirely Biden's decision. It was a decision that had been made in the Trump administration. Trump who also believed that the US Needed to get out of Afghan. It was just Biden who inherited the chaotic, messy way in which it was done.
Mara Liasson
Yeah, but the deal that Trump made was with the Taliban to pull out of Afghanistan. And he, you could say, laid the groundwork for that messy withdrawal. But Biden was the president when it happened, and he takes the blame for the big mess that it was. And we are a long time away from the era where politics stopped at the water's edge.
Susan Davis
Yeah.
Mara Liasson
And when that messy withdrawal happened, the Republicans, in particular Trump, really used it to hammer away at Biden that he was incompetent and not a good leader. And although I think it's partly coincidental, Biden's approval ratings started dropping at that moment and never recovered. Now, other things were obviously in play there, like inflation, but that was a real pivotal point in his administration.
Susan Davis
And then Greg Biden faced another crisis in Ukraine. When Russia carried out a full scale invasion back In February of 2022, Biden strongly support supported Ukraine. He even became the first president to go to a conflict zone where US Troops were not actually involved. That was a big moment in his presidency.
Greg Myhre
Yeah, that's right. And I would start just a little earlier. You know, in the weeks leading up to the invasion, Biden had to first convince the world and Ukraine, including Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky, that Russia really was about to carry out this large scale invasion. Russia had first invaded back in 2014. They sort of bluffed several additional invasions, but US intelligence said this time was real. The US shared that intelligence with Ukraine, with Europe, with the public, and said there needed to be a unified response. And there was this strong US And European response. And that helped keep the Russians from capturing Ukraine's capital, Kyiv, in the first days of the war. The US continues to lead this coalition of more than 50 countries, mostly European. They meet regularly and figure out how to help Ukraine with military supplies, economic help, humanitarian assistance. And this has been a success. And Europe, in fact, has provided more overall help than the US has and much more than many people expected. But it's been almost three years since the Russian full scale invasion. It's become more complicated. Biden is now facing pushback from Republicans about his Ukraine policy. The Ukrainians feel the US has been too cautious holding back weapons or restricting their use. Many Ukrainians feel the US Is providing them with enough not to lose, but not enough to win. And there is the sense that the war is dragging on. Ukraine is struggling to hold the front line now. President Elect Trump says he wants negotiations to end the war. Ukraine could be the place where we see the most immediate and dramatic change in policy from Biden to Trump.
Susan Davis
Mara I also think that Ukraine just marked a fascinating moment of foreign policy here in the US Among American politicians, because this was where I think the country really started, started to see America first ideology take hold, not just of Donald Trump himself, but down the board in Congress. I mean, the opposition to Ukraine involvement from the Republican Party in Congress over the past three years has just grown exponentially. And that is not a place the Republican Party would have been even 10 years ago.
Mara Liasson
No, but I believe that even though there's been an isolationist strain in the Republican Party for generations and generations, this shift was a top down shift, not bottom up. This was not the grassroots forcing Donald Trump to be against aid to Ukraine. Donald Trump has had a long time animus to Ukraine, a long time affection for Vladimir Putin and other strongman leaders and dictators around the world. So I think that a lot of that was following Trump's lead. Remember, the first impeachment against Trump was because he tried to pressure Ukraine by threatening to withhold military aid so that they would open an investigation into Joe Biden. This was, you know, long before Joe Biden decided to run for president. But he was clearly on the radar screen as an opponent to Trump.
Susan Davis
All right, let's take a quick break and we'll talk more about foreign policy in a moment.
Progressive Insurance
This message comes from Schwab. With Schwab investing themes, it's easy to invest in ideas you believe in, like online music and videos, artificial intelligence, electric vehicles, and more. Schwab's research uncovers emerging trends. Then their technology curates relevant stocks into over 40 themes to choose from. Schwab Investing Themes is not intended to be investment advice or a recommendation of any stock or investment strategy. Visit schwab.com thematicinvesting this message comes from BetterHelp this holiday season, do something for a special person in your life. You give yourself the gift of better mental health. BetterHelp online therapy connects you with a qualified therapist via phone, video or live chat. It's convenient and affordable and can be done from the comfort of your own home. Having someone to talk to is truly a gift, especially during the holidays. Visit betterhelp.com NPR to get 10% off your first month.
Ron Rutson
This message comes from Noom Using psychology and biology to build personal meal plans to fit your lifestyle, taking into account dietary restrictions, medical issues and other personal needs with daily lessons that are personalized to you and your goals. Noom's flexible program focuses on progress instead of perfection to help you build new habits for a healthier life lifestyle. Sign up for your trial today@noom.com this.
Progressive Insurance
Message comes from Grammarly. 231 is the average number of apps used by many companies. This can drain employee focus. Grammarly can help. Grammarly's AI works in over 500,000 apps and websites, making it easy for your team to write clearly and on brand without disrupting workflow. Join 70,000 teams who save an average of $5,000 per employee per year using Grammarly. Go to Grammarly.com enterprise to learn more.
Susan Davis
And we're back. And then Greg There was October 7, 2023 when Hamas attacked Israel. And then Biden, in a very symbolic trip, went to Israel in the days following that attack to reinforce the US Support of Israel. But that conflict has probably another one that will come to define his presidency.
Greg Myhre
Oh absolutely. You know, as you noted, Hamas carried out this shocking surprise attack in October of last killed 1200 people in Southern Israel, most of them civilians. Biden backed Israel to the hilt with political support, military support. The visit that you just mentioned, and we should remember this, was broadly popular in the very early days after the Hamas attack. However, Israel responded to this unprecedented attack with an unprecedented military campaign in Gaza. This sort of massive air campaign using huge bombs on densely packed territory in Gaza. This has decimated Hamas, wiped out much of its leadership, and of course it's also killed a huge number of civilians. The overall toll has now surpassed 44,000. According to the Palestinians, well over half are women and children. Biden continues to back Israel overall, while including some limited criticism over the high civilian death toll. They're still fighting mostly Israeli airstrikes at this point, though the attention in the region has now really moved on quite a bit with focus more Lebanon and now Syria.
Susan Davis
Mara if Ukraine exposed a fissure within the Republican Party, this conflict certainly exposed current and growing divisions within the Democratic Party over US Military support for Israel.
Mara Liasson
Yeah, there's no doubt about that. And I think it probably cost Kamala Harris a certain number of votes in Michigan and maybe some other states. The question is, you know, does this last beyond the Biden presidency? I don't know, because Donald Trump is going to come in with potentially a much harder line in favor of Israel. He certainly has been more supportive kind of up and down the line of whatever Benjamin Netanyahu wants to do. So I don't know what happens to that internal split inside the Democratic Party, but there's no doubt that that split will be part of Biden's legacy.
Susan Davis
Mara Biden and Trump have such, in so many ways, very distinct views on foreign policy and what America's role in the world should be. But it strikes me that at least in the case of China, when it comes to US China relations, this is one area where American presidents, regardless of party, still seem to find a lot of similarities in what the US Approach to China should be.
Mara Liasson
So, yes, there's no doubt that there's been a continuity between Trump, Biden and I expect Trump again on China. There seems to be a bipartisan consensus that China is not just an economic competitor, but an actual opponent. Biden has tried to shore up U.S. defenses not just in the South Pacific, but also at home in terms of not relying on China so much for key computer chips and other things that affect our national security. And I expect that that will be continued by Trump when he gets into office.
Susan Davis
Greg, how do you see the differences between the Trump and Biden administrations on their approach to China?
Greg Myhre
Yeah, I think the big one is that Biden has taken a number of steps with this so called pivot to Asia. Now, this is an idea that was first introduced by President Obama, who said the US needed to focus more on Asia in the 21st century. But that effort kept getting sidetracked by other developments, like renewed turmoil in the Middle East. Biden has taken some real moves and real steps. He's upgraded something called the Quad, which is an alliance of the U.S. india, Japan and Australia. All of them have security concerns about China. There's a big submarine deal with Australia. Why does Australia need expensive subs? Well, these are very advanced Weapons that put fear in the heart of China. And they're also very advanced listening devices that can suck up communications in China. And Biden is investing tens of billions of dollars through the SO Chips act to make advanced semiconductor chips in the U.S. most of those chips are now made in Taiwan, which faces threats from China. So Biden has taken all these steps in addition to the punitive measures like tariffs that Trump focused on.
Susan Davis
Mara, I know we're talking about Biden's legacy here, and I recognize that it's hard to talk about legacy when someone is still in office, but I think Donald Trump winning again, and especially on such an isolationist worldview, it does make you wonder that if a more isolationist foreign policy is the next chapter of America and how they're seen in the world, then part of Biden's legacy would be that he was sort of the tail end of the Post World War II Worldview alliance, that the US should be this dominant force in the world.
Mara Liasson
Well, I would say that's really plausible. I mean, you can imagine that really easily that this is the end. This is the end of the post Cold War era. But you know what we don't know? There's so many things going on in the world right now. We haven't even talked about Syria. Is Donald Trump going to to deal with that differently? He famously posted, it's not our fight. Let's not get involved. Well, guess What? There are 900 U.S. troops in Syria right now fighting ISIS. So this is very TBD. I think that it's possible that America might come to realize that alliances are indispensable. We don't know.
Susan Davis
Craig, what do you think about Biden's legacy? Are there parts of it that you think are stickier than others? Or as Mara said, is it just still too soon to know if there will be much of a legacy to speak of?
Greg Myhre
Well, Mara is absolutely right about so much that remains to be determined. I think we can say at this point Biden didn't intend to be a foreign policy president. He came into office with a focus on Covid and the US Economy. But as always happens, stuff happens in the world, and the US President has to respond. So I think at this point, we can say he has a very substantial record on foreign policy, and we don't yet know how a number of these crises and wars will play out. You know, his initial response in the Ukraine, Russia war was, I think, considered very strong by many. But we'll have to see what ultimately happens in that war. You know, his support for Israel has faced a ton of criticism, as we've noted. But as we've seen with events in the Middle east, they're still evolving, like the revolution in Syria. So it's hard to draw any final conclusions at this point.
Susan Davis
All right. We will leave it there. I'm Susan Davis. I cover politics.
Greg Myhre
I'm Greg Myhre. I cover national security.
Mara Liasson
And I'm Mara Liasson, senior national political correspondent.
Susan Davis
And thanks for listening to the NPR Politics podcast.
Ron Rutson
This message comes from NPR sponsor Saatva, maker of quality handcrafted mattresses. Founder and CEO Ron Rutson shares one of their core values.
Mara Liasson
At Saatva, we believe sleep does unlock a superpower. When you wake up and you're totally refreshed, you go after things more. And it all starts with being on the right mattress. And that's what Safa has been inspired by from the day that we started.
Ron Rutson
To learn more, go to saatva.com NPR this message comes from GiveWell. GiveWell provides rigorous, transparent research about the best giving opportunities so that donors can make informed decisions about high impact giving. To learn more, go to givewell.org and pick podcast and enter NPR at checkout.
Progressive Insurance
This message comes from NPR sponsor Shopify, the global commerce platform that helps you sell and show up exactly the way you want to customize your online store to your style. Sign up for a $1 per month trial period@shopify.com NPR.
Summary of “Joe Biden's Foreign Policy Legacy” – The NPR Politics Podcast, December 26, 2024
In this insightful episode of The NPR Politics Podcast, hosts Susan Davis, Greg Myhre, and Mara Liasson delve into President Joe Biden's foreign policy legacy. Released on December 26, 2024, the episode meticulously examines Biden’s key foreign policy decisions, their impacts, and the evolving political dynamics both domestically and internationally. The discussion is enriched with expert analysis, notable quotes, and timestamps for reference.
Susan Davis [00:25]:
Susan Davis opens the episode by contrasting Biden’s approach with former President Donald Trump's "America First" policy. She highlights Biden’s efforts to “rebuild and add to those alliances” after Trump’s administration took a more isolationist stance.
Mara Liasson [00:52]:
Mara Liasson agrees, stating, “he rebuilt the Western alliance, NATO... kept the Western alliance together to support Ukraine.” She acknowledges Biden’s success in restoring ties with NATO, especially in the context of supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression.
Key Takeaway:
Biden’s administration marked a significant pivot back to multilateralism and strengthening traditional alliances, reversing Trump's isolationist policies. This shift has been pivotal in shaping the current geopolitical landscape, particularly in supporting Ukraine.
Susan Davis [02:03]:
Susan probes into Biden’s handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal, a crucial early foreign policy challenge.
Greg Myhre [02:03]:
Greg Myhre provides a detailed account:
“Biden announced the plan to pull out in the spring of 2021... the US ultimately evacuated about 125,000 Afghans.” He discusses the chaotic nature of the withdrawal, including the tragic events at Kabul airport, “a suicide bombing that killed 13 American troops” [02:03].
Mara Liasson [03:35]:
Mara emphasizes, “Trump laid the groundwork for that messy withdrawal... Biden takes the blame for the big mess.” She notes the political repercussions, mentioning Biden’s declining approval ratings post-withdrawal.
Key Takeaway:
The Afghanistan withdrawal was a defining moment in Biden’s presidency, marked by chaos and significant loss of American and Afghan lives. While the decision to withdraw was initiated by Trump, Biden bore the brunt of the political fallout, impacting his approval ratings and legacy.
Susan Davis [04:22]:
Susan transitions to Biden’s response to the “full-scale invasion” of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022.
Greg Myhre [04:39]:
Greg explains, “Biden strongly supported Ukraine... became the first president to go to a conflict zone where US Troops were not actually involved.” He details Biden’s efforts in rallying a coalition of over 50 countries to provide military, economic, and humanitarian support to Ukraine. Myhre also highlights the evolving challenges as the war drags on, with criticisms from Republicans and some Ukrainians feeling the US support is insufficient.
Mara Liasson [07:40]:
Mara discusses the internal political strains in the Republican Party over Ukraine aid, tracing back to Trump’s impeachment related to Ukraine policy:
“Donald Trump has had a long time animus to Ukraine... on the radar screen as an opponent to Trump.”
Key Takeaway:
Biden’s robust support for Ukraine against Russian aggression underscored his commitment to traditional alliances and global security. However, prolonged conflict and evolving dynamics have led to political pushback and debates over the adequacy of US support.
Susan Davis [09:37]:
Susan revisits Biden’s foreign policy in the wake of the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and his subsequent visit to reinforce US support.
Greg Myhre [09:57]:
Greg elaborates on the conflict, stating, “Biden backed Israel to the hilt with political support, military support.” He describes Israel’s intense military response in Gaza and the resulting civilian casualties, noting the toll has “surpassed 44,000” with over half being women and children. Myhre points out the shifting regional focus towards Lebanon and Syria as attention wanes.
Mara Liasson [11:19]:
Mara addresses internal Democratic divisions, mentioning that Kamala Harris may have lost votes in states like Michigan due to contentious support for Israel:
“There's no doubt that that split will be part of Biden's legacy.”
Susan Davis [11:53]:
Susan highlights the stark difference between Biden and Trump on foreign policy, especially regarding Israel.
Key Takeaway:
The Israel-Hamas conflict has exposed significant fissures within the Democratic Party, balancing unwavering support for Israel with concerns over civilian casualties and regional stability. This division poses challenges for Biden’s administration and Democratic unity.
Susan Davis [12:14]:
Susan shifts focus to US-China relations, noting a bipartisan consensus on viewing China as a major competitor and opponent.
Mara Liasson [12:14]:
Mara concurs, stating, “there’s been a continuity between Trump, Biden and I expect Trump again on China.” She observes bipartisan efforts to counter China’s influence, including bolstering US defenses and reducing dependency on Chinese manufacturing.
Greg Myhre [12:50]:
Greg contrasts Biden and Trump’s approaches:
“Biden has taken a number of steps with this so called pivot to Asia... upgraded something called the Quad...” He details Biden’s investments in advanced semiconductor manufacturing and military alliances, contrasting with Trump’s focus on tariffs and punitive measures.
Key Takeaway:
US-China policy remains a cornerstone of Biden’s foreign policy, characterized by strategic alliances, technological investments, and military preparedness. This approach ensures continuity across administrations, emphasizing a unified stance against China’s rising influence.
Susan Davis [13:57]:
Susan reflects on Biden’s legacy, contemplating whether his administration represents the end of the post-World War II era of American global dominance.
Mara Liasson [14:26]:
Mara posits, “this might be the end of the post-Cold War era,” while acknowledging uncertainties such as the ongoing situation in Syria and the potential return of Trump’s isolationist tendencies.
Greg Myhre [15:10]:
Greg assesses that Biden did not originally intend to be a “foreign policy president,” focusing instead on COVID-19 and the economy. However, global crises necessitated his active involvement in foreign affairs. He concludes, “it’s hard to draw any final conclusions at this point.”
Key Takeaway:
Biden’s foreign policy legacy is still unfolding, shaped by critical events and evolving international challenges. Whether his administration marks the culmination of a globalist approach or a transitional phase remains to be seen, especially with the potential shift under a returning Trump presidency.
Joe Biden’s foreign policy has been characterized by rebuilding alliances, robust support for Ukraine, complex involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts, and a strategic stance against China. While his administration has restored traditional alliances and taken decisive actions in response to global crises, ongoing conflicts and internal political divisions pose challenges to his legacy. The future trajectory of US foreign policy will significantly influence how Biden's efforts are ultimately perceived and remembered.
Notable Quotes:
Mara Liasson [00:52]:
“He rebuilt the Western alliance, NATO... kept the Western alliance together to support Ukraine.”
Greg Myhre [02:03]:
“The US ultimately evacuated about 125,000 Afghans.”
Greg Myhre [04:39]:
“Biden strongly supported Ukraine... became the first president to go to a conflict zone where US Troops were not actually involved.”
Mara Liasson [11:19]:
“There's no doubt that that split will be part of Biden's legacy.”
Mara Liasson [12:14]:
“There’s been a continuity between Trump, Biden and I expect Trump again on China.”
This comprehensive analysis provides a nuanced understanding of President Biden’s foreign policy endeavors, their successes and setbacks, and the broader implications for the United States' role on the global stage.