MAHA Cheers and Public Health Fears as RFK Ousts Vaccine Panel

Summary

Podcast Summary: "MAHA Cheers and Public Health Fears as RFK Ousts Vaccine Panel"

Podcast Information:

• Title: The NPR Politics Podcast
• Host/Author: NPR
• Episode: MAHA Cheers and Public Health Fears as RFK Ousts Vaccine Panel
• Release Date: June 11, 2025

---

Introduction

In the June 11, 2025 episode of The NPR Politics Podcast, hosts Sarah McCammon and Mara Liasson delve into the recent and controversial decision by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to remove all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). This move has sparked significant debate within the medical community and among political circles about its implications for public health policy and vaccine trust in the United States.

---

RFK Jr.'s Removal of ACIP Members

Sarah McCammon opens the discussion by addressing the unexpected dismantling of the ACIP, a crucial CDC committee responsible for crafting vaccine policy recommendations.

Key Points:

• Role of ACIP: Will Stone, NPR’s health correspondent, explains that ACIP has been operational since the 1960s, consisting of 17 independent experts who oversee vaccine schedules for both adults and children, influencing insurance coverage for vaccines. (00:58)
• Reason for Dismissal: RFK Jr. claims the committee was "rife with conflicts of interest" and that replacing its members is necessary to "restore public confidence in vaccines." (01:58)

Notable Quote:

“Kennedy gave the explanation that this committee is just kind of rife with conflicts of interest and that in order to restore public confidence in vaccines, he needed to basically get rid of everyone and we will see who he decides to replace them with.” — Will Stone (01:58)

---

Assessing the Claims of Conflict of Interest

The podcast examines the validity of RFK Jr.'s assertion regarding widespread conflicts of interest within ACIP.

Key Points:

• Ethics in ACIP: Will Stone cites the former chair of ACIP, who emphasized the committee's strict ethics rules, where members must declare conflicts and recuse themselves from relevant votes. (02:37)
• Investigative Findings: NPR’s Ping Wong investigated a report RFK Jr. referenced, finding it insufficient to support claims of pervasive conflicts of interest. ("...it does not really back up that claim.") (02:37)

Notable Quote:

“This is not a place where we see just no rules around conflicts of interest.” — Will Stone (02:37)

---

Unprecedented Turnover and Selection Process

Sarah and Will discuss the unusual nature of purging an entire federal committee and the typical appointment process for ACIP members.

Key Points:

• Uncommon Action: Complete removal of a four-year term committee is highly irregular and considered a political move rather than a standard administrative change. (03:59)
• Selection Process: Members are usually appointed through a rigorous, non-political process, focusing on expertise rather than political alignment. (03:59)

Notable Quote:

“To clean house, as we've seen, is quite unusual.” — Will Stone (03:59)

---

Political Ramifications and Senator Cassidy's Position

Mara Liasson provides insight into the political fallout, particularly focusing on Senator Bill Cassidy’s predicament.

Key Points:

• Contradicting Promises: Senator Cassidy had assured RFK Jr. during confirmation hearings that the ACIP would remain intact. RFK Jr.'s actions directly contradict these assurances. (05:10)
• Senator’s Dilemma: Cassidy, facing reelection in a red-leaning state with a Trump-supportive base, finds himself constrained in responding to RFK Jr.’s decisions. (05:22)

Notable Quote:

“There's not much that Cassidy can do. He's also up for reelection in 2026. He comes from Louisiana, a very red, Trumpy state...” — Mara Liasson (05:22)

---

Medical Community’s Response

The episode highlights the widespread condemnation from the medical and public health sectors regarding the dismantling of ACIP.

Key Points:

• Expert Condemnation: Organizations like the American Medical Association and the Infectious Diseases Society of America have expressed deep concerns, questioning the qualifications and agendas of potential new committee members. (06:35)
• Potential Risks: Experts fear that undermining ACIP could erode vaccine policy safeguards, especially amid existing challenges like measles outbreaks and declining vaccine trust. (07:12)

Notable Quote:

“They said this is basically a reckless move that takes some guardrails off of, you know, our efforts to set vaccine policy in the U.S.” — Will Stone (06:35)

---

Impact on Public Health and Vaccine Policy

Will Stone and guests discuss the potential long-term effects of this committee overhaul on vaccine recommendations and public trust.

Key Points:

• Future Uncertainty: The medical community remains vigilant, awaiting the credentials and intentions of the new ACIP members. (07:17)
• Policy Shifts: RFK Jr.'s actions coincide with his revocation of COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for pregnant women and healthy individuals, further signaling a shift in vaccine policy. (11:06)

Notable Quote:

“ACIP has been across the entire world, the paragon of good, solid, well thought out evidence based vaccine policy. I hate to say this, we are heading in the direction of US Vaccine policy, becoming the laughing stock of the globe.” — Dr. Jonathan Tempte (12:04)

---

Political Strategy and Base Alignment

Mara Liasson analyzes RFK Jr.’s strategy in aligning with his political base, notably the "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) movement, a subset of the broader MAGA coalition.

Key Points:

• Base-Oriented Leadership: RFK Jr. prioritizes actions that resonate with his MAHA supporters, even at the risk of alienating moderate factions that favor stable vaccine policies. (08:44)
• Comparison with Trump: Drawing parallels with Donald Trump’s complicated relationship with vaccines, RFK Jr. leverages similar base support while reversing earlier positions on vaccine endorsements. (10:02)

Notable Quote:

“I think this is a very base oriented president. He is finely attuned to what his base cares about.” — Mara Liasson (08:44)

---

Conclusion and Future Outlook

Sarah McCammon wraps up the episode by emphasizing the critical observation of the newly restructured ACIP and its potential trajectory under RFK Jr.’s leadership.

Key Points:

• Ongoing Developments: The medical community and public health experts remain watchful of ACIP’s evolution and its impact on vaccine policy and public trust. (12:23)
• Long-Term Implications: The dismantling of ACIP could have far-reaching consequences for the U.S.'s standing in global vaccine policy and public health initiatives.

Notable Quote:

“We are heading in the direction of US Vaccine policy, becoming the laughing stock of the globe.” — Dr. Jonathan Tempte (12:04)

---

Final Thoughts: This episode of The NPR Politics Podcast provides a comprehensive analysis of RFK Jr.’s controversial decision to overhaul the ACIP, exploring the motivations behind the move, the reactions from various stakeholders, and the broader implications for public health and political dynamics in the United States.

Transcript

[Allie]

Hi, this is Allie, your local driver's ed instructor from Chamberlain, South Dakota. I just finished teaching 18 students how to drive, at least on paper, for our classroom portion of the class.

[Sarah McCammon]

This show is recorded at 1:39pm Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 11, 2025.

[Allie]

Things may have changed by the time you hear this, but there will for sure be 18 new drivers out on the road. So buckle. Enjoy the show.

[Mara Liasson]

What a great thing.

[Sarah McCammon]

That isn't important, but it sounds to me like a terrifying job. Hey there. It's the NPR Politics podcast. I'm Sarah McCammon. I cover politics.

[Mara Liasson]

I'm Mara Liasson, senior national political correspondent.

[Sarah McCammon]

Today on the show, we're talking about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. S latest moves to reshape public health agencies and, of course, the politics around all of that. Will Stone from NPR's health team is here to help us make sense of all of it. Hey there, Will.

[Will Stone]

Hey there.

[Sarah McCammon]

I want to start with the news this week that the Health and human services secretary, RFK Jr. Has removed all 17 members of a committee that helps craft vaccine policy. Now, this is not a committee that we talk about a lot. So what does this committee do? And why did RFK Jr decide to clean house here?

[Will Stone]

Sure. This is the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, ACIP for short. It's a CDC committee. It's been around since the 60s, actually. And you're right, we don't think a lot about them. They're pretty technical. It's filled with 17 independent experts who are appointed through, through a pretty rigorous process at the cdc. And they review data, they make recommendations on the vaccine schedule for adults and for children. And this also influences insurance coverage for vaccines. They have been a topic of criticism for Secretary Kennedy for quite a while, and some had, you know, wondered whether he would, if he was eventually secretary, come in and clean house like he did. And basically Kennedy gave the explanation that this committee is just kind of rife with conflicts of interest and that in order to restore public confidence in vaccines, he needed to basically get rid of everyone and we will see who he decides to replace them with.

[Sarah McCammon]

And will this idea that committee members and others involved in public health have these huge conflicts of interest, I mean, this is something we've heard from rfk. How much truth is there to that claim?

[Will Stone]

Okay, Well, I spoke with the former chair of ACIP who said, you know, actually there are very tough ethics rules here, and if you just watch the meetings, you see people have to mention whether they have conflicts of interest before a vote. And if they do they recuse themselves. Now, Kennedy likes to cite this old report that was done a number of years ago where they looked at conflicts of interest across all CDC advisory committees. And he likes to cite that as proof that there are kind of widespread, serious conflicts of interest. And actually, my colleague Ping Wong has looked into this, tracked down the people who were involved in that report and found that actually it does not really back up that claim. So this is not a place where we see just no rules around conflicts of interest. And even one doctor I spoke to Jeffrey Klausner at USC who has actually given Kennedy some recommendations in the past about who might be new ACIP members. He told me he does not think, you know, this claim about conflicts of interest is really founded.

[Sarah McCammon]

Now, turnover in the federal government with a new administration is pretty common. But this, as you said, was the entire committee. How are members of this committee normally chosen or replaced? I mean, how unusual is this?

[Will Stone]

To clean house, as we've seen, is quite unusual. These are experts who are appointed for four year terms and it's usually not thought of as a political kind of process. Obviously, we are in a new moment where Kennedy is really wanting to revisit vaccine policy in the U.S. but this came as a shock, actually. My colleague Ping Huang here at NPR just spoke with one of the booted members. He did not know he was going to be kicked off of the committee until he saw the Wall Street Journal opinion piece that was authored by Kennedy. And then shortly after that, he got an email notifying him that he was no longer going to be serving there.

[Sarah McCammon]

That is one way to send a message. That's right, Mara. During RFK's Senate confirmation hearings, his views on vaccines, his record on vaccines were a big focus. As you'll remember. Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, who is also himself a medical doctor, said on the floor at the time that he had received some assurances from Kennedy that he would maintain this committee known as acip.

[Jonathan Tempte]

It confirmed he will maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations without changes.

[Sarah McCammon]

I mean, Mara, what do you make of this reversal?

[Mara Liasson]

Well, I think that Senator Cassidy is in a very difficult position because there's not much he can do now that Kennedy is leading hhs. He certainly seems to have taken an action that's contrary to what he promised Cassidy. Cassidy posted this on X. He said, of course, now the fear is that the A sip will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion. He goes on to say, I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy And I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case. I don't think there's much that Cassidy can do. He's also up for reelection in 2026. He comes from Louisiana, a very red, Trumpy state, and he has to face a primary. And I think that this is a story that is repeating itself over and over again in the United States Senate, which is if your principles suggest that you would be opposing President Trump or some of his Cabinet secretaries on some issue, your devotion to him and, and the necessity of staying on his good side if you want to keep your job, just overwhelms every other consideration. And I think that's what's. What's happening here.

[Sarah McCammon]

Well, what are you hearing about all of this from the group that's going to be in some ways most affected by this? The medical community?

[Will Stone]

Yeah. The reaction has been widespread condemnation of this decision. It's exactly what people had worried about. We had the American Medical association, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, past CDC directors, all coming out and saying they're concerned about what this could mean. Who will be the new members? Will they have the credentials you expect, or will they just be pushing their own agenda, maybe to undermine vaccine policy? And they said this is basically a reckless move that takes some guardrails off of, you know, our efforts to set vaccine policy in the U.S. and do.

[Sarah McCammon]

We have a sense of what that might mean for patients who these vaccines ultimately serve?

[Will Stone]

It remains to be seen because again, we don't actually know what changes they will make it to the committee. Kennedy did take questions on the, on this decision on ACIP and the other day, and he said, these are not going to be anti vaxxers. These are going to be highly credentialed experts in the field. And so we'll see who ends up filling these roles. I spoke to some folks who aren't as concerned and say, hey, they will be if they see people who are kind of wellness influencers and don't have the expertise, but they're reserving judgment till they see what happens again.

[Sarah McCammon]

You know, this is a committee that most people don't pay attention to, usually is not national news. But the future makeup of this committee, I think, will tell us a lot about the direction that RFK intends to go. Let's take a quick break. More on this when we get back. And we're back. You know, we should say Kennedy spent decades promoting false claims about vaccines. And this action getting rid of these committee members is something that a lot of his supporters have wanted. They've been calling for this. But, you know, is there a risk of alienating people by playing to the base to this degree? I mean, there's a faction of people who I think resonate with RFK's calls to reform the food system, but may also support vaccines and want to see stability in the vaccine system. Is there a risk of going too far with this?

[Mara Liasson]

I don't think the White House thinks so. I think this is a very base oriented president. He is finely attuned to what his base cares about. He usually leads with that. And don't forget Maha, Make America Healthy Again, which is RFK's base, is really a subsidiary of MAGA. Make America Great Again. And I think that's why he chose rfk. He understood that a lot of vaccine skeptics were his supporters. So I don't think he's going to alienate anybody that he cares about by sticking with rfk.

[Will Stone]

In fact, I would say that this was an important action by Secretary Kennedy to really show this wing of this MAHA coalition, which does have different factions, that he has not forgotten about his work in the anti vaccine movement, that he is still looking at revisiting vaccine policy because there has been some concern and kind of fighting within that MAHA movement around whether kind of focus on healthy eating and and other issues that are also central to the MAHA platform might end up taking more precedent over actually looking at changing vaccine policy.

[Mara Liasson]

And you know, Trump has such an interesting and complicated relations with the vaccine that he helped get online. He was responsible for Operation Warp Speed, which was the effort to get a COVID vaccine online very quickly and it succeeded. But his base is very vaccine skeptical and he's run into some pushback from his base, some boos at rallies when he talks about the vaccines that he takes credit for. And he is a politician who never likes to get crosswise with his base. And that's why over time he talked less and less about the vaccines that at one point he was so very proud of.

[Sarah McCammon]

Yeah, where is that Trump of 2020 and 2021. Mara, the guy who was, you know, touting his achievement with getting the vaccine online and telling people he took it.

[Mara Liasson]

He's left the building now.

[Sarah McCammon]

I want to look forward just a little bit. Well, this week we've seen this shakeup at acip. Last month, Kennedy announced that the government would no longer recommend Covid vaccines for pregnant women or for healthy. What reasons did Kennedy give for that decision?

[Will Stone]

Well, there were concerns about the data that were articulated by, you know, Kennedy and others A lot of folks in this camp of Maha who see the MRNA vaccine platform, you know, which was used obviously for the COVID shot, they want to see that gone. They think it's responsible for all kinds of harms which, you know, have not been backed up by studies. This, interestingly, was not a decision that went through acip, although typically, you know, this is the committee that tries to make these calls and recommendations. And I think, you know, it's just one more data point here for people who are very concerned about undermining confidence in vaccines. They see this as just one more action. And actually, I spoke with the former Chair of the ACIP, Dr. Jonathan Tempte, who's now at the University of Wisconsin. Here's what he had to say to me about where he thinks all this is headed.

[Jonathan Tempte]

ACIP has been across the entire world, the paragon of good, solid, well thought out evidence based vaccine policy. I hate to say this, we are heading in the direction of US Vaccine policy, becoming the laughing stock of the globe.

[Sarah McCammon]

Some strong words there.

[Will Stone]

Yep. And you hear that kind of language from others in the medical and public health establishment. And then there are obviously people in Mahaland and supporters of Trump who think this is overdue and actually want to see, you know, real changes to the vaccine schedule, which is very concerning for public health particularly. Remember, we still have measles cases and, you know, declining trust in vaccines.

[Sarah McCammon]

Well, again, lots of eyes will be on that committee, a committee that I don't think I knew existed until this week. So we're going to leave it there for today. Will, thanks so much for being with us.

[Will Stone]

Thanks for having me.

[Sarah McCammon]

I'm Sarah McCammon. I cover politics.

[Mara Liasson]

I'm Mara Liasson, senior national political correspondent.

[Sarah McCammon]

And thank you for listening to the NPR Politics podcast.