
Loading summary
NPR Sponsor
This message comes from the Nature Conservancy. Nature is common ground for everyone, and uniting to protect nature can help solve today's challenges and create a thriving tomorrow for future generations. Discover why@nature.org NPR. This message comes from DSW. Where'd you get those shoes? Easy. They're from DSW. Because DSW has the exact right shoes for whatever you're into right now. You know, like the sneakers that make office hours feel like happy hour, the boots that turn grocery aisles into runways, and all the styles that show off the many sides of you, from daydreamer to multitasker and everything in between because you do it all in really great shoes. Find a shoe for every you at your DSW store or dsw.com.
Brad Reynolds
Hi, this is Brad Reynolds from Cordova, Alaska. I'm currently rolling around in my fishing vessel in the North Pacific, enduring yet another easterly blow. But I'm hoping to land a few more Copper river salmon before this fishing period is over. This podcast was recorded on Tuesday, June.
Tamara Keith
24Th at 1:09pm Eastern Time.
Brad Reynolds
Things may have changed by the time you hear this, but hopefully I will be snug, secure and in Anchorage enjoying a cup of coffee, the kind that doesn't go flying across the cabin. Enjoy the show.
Claudia Grisales
Wow.
Tamara Keith
The best part about this is that even before he said he was on a boat, it just sounded like he was on a boat. I felt like I was there.
Claudia Grisales
I wish I was there. It's too hot here. I'd like to be there.
Tamara Keith
Seriously. Hey there. It's the NPR Politics podcast. Podcast. I'm Tamara Keith. I cover the White House.
Claudia Grisales
And I'm Claudia Grizales. I cover Congress.
Tamara Keith
We've also got NPR senior science editor and correspondent Jeff Brumfield with us. Hi, Jeff.
Jeff Brumfield
Hi there.
Tamara Keith
President Trump took another victory lap this morning after this weekend's strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities.
Donald Trump
Iran will never rebuild its nuclear from there. Absolutely not. That place is under rock. That place is demolished. The B2 pilots did their job. They did it better than anybody could even imagine.
Tamara Keith
But experts say when it comes to Iran's nuclear program, it's too early to declare mission accomplished. Today we're going to break down what we know about how successful the strikes were and talk about the fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel that was announced last night. So, Jeff, let's start with you. The goal of Operation Midnight Hammer was to destroy Iran's nuclear program. President Trump said it was obliterated. What do you know about how successful it was?
Jeff Brumfield
Well, I think we can say that it definitely set the program back and probably set it back quite a bit. So if we talk about Operation Midnight Hammer, this was a group of B2 bombers that flew from Missouri 18 hours direct to Iran. And the bombers actually struck two facilities. One was a uranium enrichment site at Natanz, and the other one was the main target at Fordo. This was a uranium enrichment site deep inside a mountain. The Israelis could not reach it with their own weapons. And so these bombers used these 30,000 pound bunker buster bombs, tried to punch through the rock. And as far as we can tell, they probably did do quite a bit of damage to that site. Now, a submarine also launched cruise missiles as part of Operation Midnight Hammer that hit a third site. Those missiles struck a place called Isfahan that has a lot of uranium research that goes on there. And so taken together, those three strikes and the Israeli strikes that have been going on for the past, you know, almost two weeks now have done considerable damage to Iran's program. But I wouldn't say it's exactly mission accomplished.
Tamara Keith
Yeah. So is it fair to say that these strikes hit their targets, but we don't know if they met their objectives?
Jeff Brumfield
Yeah, I think that's exactly the right way to say it. They definitely hit their targets. But there's a lot we don't know, not just about the uranium, but about various parts of Iran's nuclear program. So I spoke to Cori Hinderstein, she's a vice president at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and here's what she had to say.
NPR Sponsor
I would not consider the nuclear program destroyed.
Lauren Schmies
I would agree that it has been.
NPR Sponsor
Set back, but by how much and.
Claudia Grisales
With what kind of permanence I think.
NPR Sponsor
Is a big question mark.
Jeff Brumfield
And Henderson was actually in charge of monitoring Iran's program under the Biden administration. And so she says we just don't know much because partially the international monitors that happened there have all been pulled out. And partially these. These places are destroyed, but presumably not completely destroyed. And so there may be equipment there. You know, there's also these stocks of highly enriched uranium. This stuff is very mobile. You know, it can be taken out of these facilities. It can be put into cars. It's thought that maybe around 10 vehicles would be all it takes to move this stuff around. And this uranium is not quite bomb grade, but it's very, very close. And Iran has enough for nine or ten weapons. So this stuff is still out there somewhere. We don't know if it's been destroyed along with other parts of Iran's program.
Claudia Grisales
So, Jeff, you're saying that this enriched uranium can be moved relatively easily. So do we know that's what's happened here?
Jeff Brumfield
Well, let me tell you what we know. We know that there were trucks at the two sites where we think the enriched uranium was being stored in the days before the American strike. So we know that Iran was moving something around, but we don't know exactly what. There is satellite imagery that shows us that. The other thing we know is that Iran has stopped telling the international watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, where its equipment and uranium is. They have informed them that they have taken these measures. They may or may not be moving it. So the bottom line is there's evidence that they probably took steps to secure the stuff and move it, but we don't know if they did for sure, and we certainly don't know where they took it.
Claudia Grisales
So it's possible that Iran still has this enriched uranium stockpiled somewhere, but. But do they have the capability now to keep enriching it?
Jeff Brumfield
Right. So the stockpile they have right now is about 60% enriched, which is actually very, very close to bomb grade, much closer than you might think. The question is, can they put that uranium back into centrifuges, the machines they use to enrich it, and can they enrich it further? And again, we don't know. So we know Iran has the ability to manufacture centrifuges, but we don't know how many they've made or where they might be stor or, you know, if they can pull them out and set them up somewhere. We just don't know. Now, I think it's fair to say, based on the evidence we have, that the existing centrifuges have been badly damaged or destroyed. I don't think Iran could do this overnight, but could they get this material to weapons grade if they really wanted to? I think the answer is perhaps, yeah.
Tamara Keith
President Trump, however, is very confident and proceeding with policy as if Iran is no longer a nuclear threat. He appears to be arguing that that Iran is sort of welcomed back into the world because there's now a ceasefire, as tenuous as it may be.
Jeff Brumfield
One of the really interesting things that I've been hearing today and talking to people who know about Iran's program, is that if you really do want to stop it, guess what, you have to go back to negotiations now with Iran and try and reach some sort of deal where you have some insight into what they have left and what they're going to do with it. And so far, it doesn't seem like that's really been talked about much within the administration. But I've been speaking to experts, both who've served under Trump and under Obama and Biden, and they all say the same thing. The only way to ensure Iran doesn't start for a bomb again is to actually go back and negotiate now that you've done these strikes.
Tamara Keith
All right. Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll have more on reaction from Congress when we get back.
NPR Sponsor
This message comes from DataIQ. Take control of AI's raw power with Data IQ, the universal AI platform built for trust and designed to scale at Dataiku.com NPR D A T A I K U.com NPR this message comes from.
Eduardo
US Bank Simplify how you do business with business essentials, a powerful combination of no monthly maintenance fee checking and card payment processing. Deposit products are offered by U.S. bank National association member FDIC.
Lauren Schmies
You're listening to the NPR Network.
Claudia Grisales
Live from NPR News.
Tamara Keith
I'm Lauren Schmies.
Lauren Schmies
A living, breathing record of your neighborhood, the country, the world, told by thousands of local journalists who live in the places where stories unfold, backed by a national newsroom that puts it all in perspective. Hear the whole country's story. Hear ways of thinking that challenge your own. Hear the bigger picture with npr.
NPR Sponsor
The House of Representatives has approved a White House request to claw back two years of previously approved funding for public, public media. The rescissions package now moves on to the Senate. This move poses a serious threat to local stations and public media as we know it. Please take a stand for public media today@goacpr.org thank you.
Tamara Keith
And we're back. And, Claudia, you've been tracking the reaction to all of this from Capitol Hill, going back to the US Strikes on Iran, then Iran's response. Now the news of a tentative ceasefire, which, depending on the moment, either seems like it's holding or seems like it's in trouble. Let's start with Republicans. What are you hearing from them?
Claudia Grisales
Right. It's very tentative now. And we've seen basically a response that is moving with each of these shifts in terms of where Israel and Iran is at the moment. For example, right after the strikes, we saw Republicans overwhelmingly supportive of the president. Again, this is the most united Trump has been with Republicans in Congress. So they're largely backing anything he's doing at this stage, even if there's some disagreements on whether he should consult Congress or get authorization from Congress. Now, as we move further into this week, for example, with the ceasefire, Congress was supposed to receive briefings today on Iran, and they were canceled for the Senate and the House. We've seen a range of reactions there. I talked to Chairman Roger Wicker of the Senate Armed Services Committee. This is a Republican, and he. He said he was disappointed. Right now, we are understanding that it will be moved to later in the week. But there are plenty of questions of where things stand right now and what I've heard from sources. There's concerns that the situation is still very hot. It's not clear the ceasefire is going to hold. And so clearly, Republicans remain supportive of the president, but they're also on edge in terms of what are the next steps.
Tamara Keith
Yeah. And just in terms of Republicans, it's been fascinating to watch the evolution. There are certainly some MAGA Republicans who were pretty concerned that President Trump had even authorized these strikes to go forward. Some of them have evolved to being very happy with how it turned out.
Claudia Grisales
Right, exactly. Because we did see Republicans starting to step out and raise concerns about Trump's decision to move ahead with these strikes. And we saw, for example, Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, he wanted to push forward a of legislation known as aumf. This is the Authorization for Use of Military Force. This has been an ongoing debate for decades here in terms of forcing the president to come to Congress before such strikes happen. But Massie backed off after word of this ceasefire came out. We know Democrats, for example, in the House are pursuing their own AUMF legislation. They want to vote in the House. Now, on the Senate side, we may see that happen. Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia is pushing that. He has Republicans who have said they will support him. So it's possible they're looking at a vote on this later this week on Thursday. But when we look at dissenters, for example, Marjorie Taylor Greene, who was raising concern yesterday that the efforts of the strikes and what could come next really flew in the face of America first. And we've seen others say, I'm worried about the regime change language, such as Warren Davidson of Ohio in the House. But now, again, that we have the ceasefire, we're seeing Republicans largely step back. They want to see how this plays out, and they're hoping it holds.
Jeff Brumfield
Claudia, what about the Democrats? I mean, have they sort of found a unified way to talk about what's been happening?
Claudia Grisales
Yeah, you could tell this weekend that they were struggling. They were slow to come out with a statement. I mean, one of the first things we do is we look for reactions when we have major events like this. And there were plenty from Republicans supporting the president, but it took a while to hear from Democratic leaders and other Democrats. It's a tough issue to navigate because they don't want to be in a position where they're defending Iran. But at the same time, they want to push for the president to come to Congress for consultation, for permission to do these kind of strikes. So they have unified more in the last couple days. For example, we saw Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer at the last minute called an impromptu press conference with reporters and he was furious. Here's what he said.
Donald Trump
Senators deserve full transparency. There is a legal obligation for the administration to inform Congress about precisely what is happening. What are they afraid of?
Tamara Keith
So, Claudia, Congress in the Constitution has the war powers. Congress is supposed to be the one that declares war. But this just has has not happened in recent memory. This is one of the many roles that Congress has essentially just punted to the executive. And they've been unable, despite some people like Senator Tim Kaine who you mentioned, they've been unable to pass another authorization of the use of military force since the Iraq war. Is there any chance that that changes or what could Congress's role be here if they aren't willing to assert their power?
Claudia Grisales
Right. This morning we heard from Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina who talked about exactly that. And he said basically the overwhelming way of doing business in America is for the president to act to use military force. So basically making that point that that authorization that's been a desire for many members here is a thing of the past. And he talked about as a body in the last 250 years, almost every time it's the president leading that military action, there is no consultation with Congress. So it really is also another reminder of Congress kind of surrendering that control to the president. Republican led chambers doing this and being so closely aligned with the president and allowing him to take the lead on such massive decisions like this.
Tamara Keith
Well, let's leave it there for today. Jeff, thanks so much for joining us.
Jeff Brumfield
You're welcome.
Tamara Keith
I'm Tamara Keith. I cover the White House.
Claudia Grisales
And I'm Claudia Grisales. I cover Congress.
Tamara Keith
And thank you for listening to the NPR Politics podcast.
NPR Sponsor
Support for this podcast and the following message come from indeed. You just realized your business needed to hire someone yesterday. Indeed's sponsored jobs helps you stand out. According to INDEED data, sponsored jobs posted directly on indeed have 45% more applications than non sponsored jobs. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed and get a $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility@ Indeed.com NPR terms and conditions apply. Hiring Indeed is all you need.
Eduardo
This message comes from Capella University. At Capella, you can earn your degree with support from people who care about your success. A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more at Capella.
NPR Sponsor
Eduardo this message comes from Squarespace offering a library of professionally designed website templates. Grow your business with a customizable website. Visit squarespace.com NPR for 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.
The NPR Politics Podcast: "Mission Accomplished? What We Know About The State of Iran's Nuclear Program"
Release Date: June 24, 2025
In this episode of The NPR Politics Podcast, host Tamara Keith and co-host Claudia Grisales delve into the recent military actions against Iran's nuclear facilities, exploring the efficacy of these strikes and the ensuing political ramifications. Joining them is Jeff Brumfield, NPR’s senior science editor and correspondent, who provides expert analysis on the state of Iran's nuclear program post-operation.
The episode opens with a discussion of Operation Midnight Hammer, a significant military campaign aimed at crippling Iran's nuclear capabilities. Jeff Brumfield details the operation:
Jeff Brumfield [02:48]: "Operation Midnight Hammer was conducted by a group of B2 bombers that flew from Missouri directly to Iran, striking two key uranium enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordo using 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. Additionally, a submarine-launched cruise missile targeted the Isfahan facility, known for its uranium research."
Brumfield emphasizes that while the strikes were precise and likely inflicted substantial damage, declaring the mission a complete success remains premature. He notes:
Jeff Brumfield [04:11]: "They definitely hit their targets. But there's a lot we don't know... The uranium is very mobile and can be transported easily, which raises concerns about what remains of Iran's stockpiles."
Despite President Trump’s confident assertion of victory, experts suggest a more nuanced reality. Brumfield conveys skepticism regarding the complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear ambitions:
Jeff Brumfield [05:36]: "The existing centrifuges have been badly damaged or destroyed. While Iran cannot rapidly replace them, the enriched uranium stockpiled—around 60%—is dangerously close to weapon grade, posing a significant threat if reactivated."
He further explains that the international monitoring of Iran’s nuclear activities has diminished, making it challenging to assess the full extent of the damage and potential recovery of Iran’s program.
The episode transitions to the political fallout from the strikes, focusing on reactions within Congress.
Initially, Republicans overwhelmingly supported President Trump’s decision, showcasing unity within the party. However, as developments unfolded, particularly with the announcement of a tentative ceasefire, some shifts emerged:
Claudia Grisales [10:22]: "Republicans remain largely supportive of the president, but they're on edge regarding the next steps. Concerns persist about the ceasefire holding and what actions should follow."
Notably, figures like Thomas Massie initially pushed for stricter legislative oversight through the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) but withdrew support after the ceasefire was announced. Contrarily, Marjorie Taylor Greene expressed apprehension over the strikes, emphasizing an "America first" approach.
Democrats have been more critical, advocating for increased Congressional oversight. Claudia Grisales points out the delayed and cautious nature of their response:
Claudia Grisales [13:41]: "Democratic leaders were slow to respond initially but have unified in recent days, pushing for the president to seek Congressional authorization for such military actions."
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer voiced strong dissatisfaction, demanding transparency:
Donald Trump [14:31]: "Senators deserve full transparency. There is a legal obligation for the administration to inform Congress about precisely what is happening."
A pivotal theme of the episode revolves around the constitutional war powers vested in Congress. Despite historical precedents favoring executive action, recent actions have seen a trend towards presidential autonomy in military decisions.
Claudia Grisales [15:25]: "Senator Lindsey Graham highlighted that the overwhelming norm is for the president to lead military actions without consulting Congress, reflecting Congress's surrender of control to the executive branch."
The discussion underscores the ongoing debate over the AUMF, with some Republicans and Democrats seeking to reassert Congressional authority over military engagements.
As the episode wraps up, Jeff Brumfield advocates for renewed diplomatic efforts:
Jeff Brumfield [07:35]: "The only way to ensure Iran doesn't restart its nuclear weapons program is to negotiate a deal that provides insight into their remaining capabilities. This approach has not been substantially pursued by the current administration."
The tentative ceasefire between Iran and Israel introduces a fragile peace, but uncertainties regarding Iran's nuclear capabilities and Congressional oversight remain pressing concerns.
This episode provides a comprehensive examination of the complexities surrounding Iran's nuclear program, the mixed efficacy of military interventions, and the intricate political dynamics within the United States Congress.