Loading summary
Susan Davis
This message comes from Carvana. With Carvana Value Tracker, you can track your car's value anytime, anywhere.
Domenico Montanaro
Carvana will even let you know when.
Susan Davis
Your car's value changes with updated emails. However you value your car, know its.
Domenico Montanaro
Worth with Carvana Value Tracker.
Susan Davis
A quick word before the show. The 2024 election is over, and as a new administration prepares to assume power, it's our job across the entire NPR network to report on what they do with that power. And that's why we're here, because information is power, too. Your support makes it possible for us to break down big stories, to fact check, and to make sure you understand what's going on. When you donate, you make a difference in our ability to do this work tomorrow. And if you're already a supporter, we're taking this moment to say thank you. And if you're not, go to donate.NPR.org to give donate.NPR.org okay, here's the show. Hello, this is Silas from Colorado. I am about to go to my wind ensemble practice at the Greater Boulder Youth Orchestra. This podcast was recorded at 12:43pm on Friday, November 8. Things may have changed by the time you hear this, but I will hopefully still be enjoying the French horn. Enjoy the show. I was hoping it was going to be the bassoon or something.
Domenico Montanaro
You with the bassoon?
Danielle Kurtzleben
I was going to guess oboe for some reason.
Domenico Montanaro
Oboe and bassoon are very close.
Susan Davis
Are they really?
Domenico Montanaro
Yeah, they look very similar. You have to have a very keen eye to notice the difference.
Danielle Kurtzleben
What, one is gargantuan and one is not? Go see a symphony sometime.
Susan Davis
Hey there. It's the NPR Politics podcast. I'm Susan Davis. I cover politics.
Danielle Kurtzleben
I'm Danielle Kurtzleben. I cover the presidential campaign.
Domenico Montanaro
And I'm Domenico Montanaro, senior political editor and correspondent.
Susan Davis
And former President Trump won the Electoral College, and for the first time in his three runs for president, he's on track to win the popular vote. And if Republicans hold onto their House majority, which they appear on track to be, his party will have full control of the levers of power in Washington. Domenico it was a huge victory for the Republican Party, and it was a victory that was in large part powered by men.
Domenico Montanaro
Yeah. You know, I found it really interesting, you know, when you look at the numbers overall. I mean, you know, 71% of the electorate were white voters, and that's the first time that's gone up since 1992, because we are in a society where whites as a share of the population are on decline and have been on decline since 1992, pretty significantly. So the first, the fact that that went up, the fact that Republicans do so well with white voters generally, that obviously helped Trump. But when you dig in a little deeper, you see some real trends where men sort of outpaced others that did shift. I mean, when you look at Latinos, for example, Trump won a record share for a Republican, 46% of Latinos. He won 55% of Latino men. Harris won about 60% of Latinos. That's still down from what Joe Biden did, for example. But, you know, the swing with Latino men is just really a big piece of what fueled that difference with Latinos overall. And when it came to younger voters 18 to 29, Trump narrowly won younger men, 49, 47, women, about 61%. 18 to 29 went for Harris. And Democrats usually have to be at about 60% with voters 18 to 29 to win. And obviously they weren't this time. And a lot of that was because of men.
Susan Davis
I mean, Danielle, none of this is by accident. We've talked so much over the course of this campaign about how much gender mattered, but the Trump campaign made a very clear overture to male voters, almost in a way, the same way that Kamala Harris campaign was making overtures to women very much.
Danielle Kurtzleben
But I really want to make sure we get this right, because, yes, men swung further toward Trump than they did in 2020, but women also did. This was a shift that spanned both men and women, if we're trusting the exit polls from 2020 and 2024, and again, be slippery, but let's just go off those Numbers. Men in 2020 chose Trump by 8 points. This year, they chose him by 13 points. All right, women in 2020 chose Biden by 15 points and Harris by 8 points. So women slid 7 points and men slid 5 points. So there are certainly subgroups of men that really swung, especially, like Domenico said, Latino men and young men. But there was some real movement among certain groups of women as well.
Domenico Montanaro
Yeah, I think it's interesting because Harris obviously targeted the sub pretty heavily. I think she thought that she was going to be able to win by bigger margins with white women in the suburbs and wound up losing white women in the suburbs by 7 points. She lost white men in the suburbs by 27 points. So much wider. And there were certainly some kitchen table disputes, obviously, but certainly not big enough for Harris to win. And there was also obviously, this divide by education. Women without college degrees went for Trump by huge margins, while women with college degrees actually went for Harris by wider margin. And turned out at a higher rate than they did in 2020, but obviously weren't enough to help Harris overcome the losses with all those other groups.
Danielle Kurtzleben
Yeah, to me, the gender story, at least for now, is in the candidate's messaging, and to what degree that messaging worked or did not, as you alluded to, Sue Trump did go on a lot of these podcasts that have largely men, and especially young men listeners, as in an effort to try to turn those men out and swing them to his side. And to some degree, that seems as if it worked. The broader story of that seems to be that the candidates were working to see what media ecosystems they could work within to boost their turnout, to boost their voters, and it seems that it worked for Trump. Now, on the flip side, Kamala Harris really pinned her hopes to abortion, and that fired up a lot of women, but just not enough. And it did not resonate with as many men as she hoped.
Susan Davis
Can we get to the bigger question, which is what's the why? I mean, I think the gender gap, as we talked about a lot, was in the context of abortion rights and that it would make sense that women were more driving towards the party that was seen as in support of abortion rights. It seems like a lot of this gender divide, too, was just about maybe a broader cultural divide, like the male vote, to me, doesn't seem like it was driven by clear policies as much as a sense that the Republican Party was just a place that was more welcoming for them.
Danielle Kurtzleben
Yes, I think that is absolutely correct. But also, I mean, it wasn't just positive messaging to the men. Trump had a lot of negative messaging to women. That is a party that is talking about a gender hierarchy and is putting men at the top of it.
Domenico Montanaro
Yeah. I mean, what we hear a lot anecdotally is that there's a lot of young men who feel aggrieved. You hear from parents, you hear it from the younger men themselves, that they feel like all these other groups society puts above them makes it harder for them to get jobs. They feel like they're targeted, and it's about, like, what type of country they want to be in or if they feel included in. But I also think that it starts with the issues. I mean, you know, when the views of the economy are as bleak as they are, rightly or wrongly, it makes it really, really difficult for somebody who is associated as closely as Kamala Harris is, obviously with the Biden administration. I mean, in the exit polls, we saw 2/3 of people had a negative view of the economy. Three quarters said that inflation caused them some degree of hardship. And only a quarter of people said that their financial situation now is better than four years ago. When you have those kinds of things, it makes it really difficult for the sitting vice president to be able to distance herself, to be able to say that she can make the needed change.
Susan Davis
We've talked a lot about how Trump defies political expectations and realities. And one thing when we're talking about young men that I think is interesting is that historically we tend to think of young voters that like 18 to 30 crew as just leaning more liberal. And it is interesting to me whether this is an aberration this election, or if this is an indication of younger Americans just moving in a more conservative direction than we might have anticipated.
Domenico Montanaro
I think this is about information ecosystems. And if every TikTok feed that you're getting or every podcast you're listening to is playing to your confirmation bias and telling you what you want to hear, then I think that for Democrats, they're going to need to get into those places where people are listening to be able to change what they're thinking about. Because I think probably 10 years ago maybe we would have said 18 to 29 year old voters were concerned about climate change and they were moving more liberally socially than their parents were. And that's not what this generation seems to be, at least when it comes to young men.
Danielle Kurtzleben
These generational generalizations are really hard to do in the moment, but hey, I'm going to take a stab at it anyway. If you look at millennials, for example, millennials have remained a bit more liberal as they have aged than the generations that are older than them. One thing that you can read into all of this about millennials getting more liberal and Gen Z perhaps being a bit more conservative. Millennials came of age during the Iraq War, a very unpopular war during the Great Recession when they entered a job market that had cratered. Millennials had difficulty finding houses for quite a while. And on and on and on. Gen Z, meanwhile, a lot of them were in school or college during a pandemic when a, you know, a government or the powers that be around them had, you know, stay at home orders, wanted people to stay home from class, et cetera. I mean, they grew up in a very different environment and very different things that they were distrustful of, AKA perhaps authority and that they were angry about. I think that in the coming years we are going to be unspooling just how much that affected Gen Z's politics.
Susan Davis
All right, Danielle Kurtzleben, thanks so much.
Danielle Kurtzleben
Thank you.
Susan Davis
We're going to take a quick break, and when we get back, what happens to the dozens of federal criminal charges against Donald Trump?
Domenico Montanaro
This is Ira Glass of this American Life. Each week on our show, we choose a theme, tell different stories on that theme. All right, I'm just going to stop right there. You're listening to an NPR podcast. Chances are you know our show. So instead I'm going to tell you we've just been on a run of really good shows lately, some big, epic, emotional stories and some weird, funny stuff, too. Download us this American Life.
Kerry Johnson
Okay.
Domenico Montanaro
So does this sound like you? You love NPR's podcasts. You wish you could get more of.
Susan Davis
All your favorite shows, and you want.
Domenico Montanaro
To support NPR's mission to create a more informed public.
Susan Davis
If all that sounds appealing, then it is time to sign up for the NPR Bundle.
Domenico Montanaro
Learn more at plus.NPR.org if you need a moment to catch your breath and calm your nerves, listen to the latest All Songs Considered from NPR Music. We've got an all new mix of songs to slow the blood and recalibrate your day. Plus reflections on gratitude, joy and the power of kindness. Listen to new episodes of All Songs CONSIDERED every Tuesday, wherever you get podcasts.
Susan Davis
And we're back with NPR's Kerry Johnson. Hey, Kerry.
Kerry Johnson
Hey, there.
Susan Davis
Obviously, we've been wanting to talk about this all week, but it's time to talk about what happens to the legal cases against the former and now incoming president. Let's just start with the federal cases.
Kerry Johnson
You know, we just had some news come in right before I came in.
Susan Davis
And lay it on me.
Kerry Johnson
Jack Smith, the special counsel who's in charge of these two federal cases against Donald Trump just asked the judge in Washington, D.C. for a delay until early December. We have an unprecedented circumstance, and that that is that the former president, Donald Trump, is a criminal defendant fighting charges that accuse him of breaking the law to cling to power in 2020. But he's also now the president elect, and the Justice Department needs a little time to figure that out. It seems like by December 2nd, Jack Smith says he'll have a way forward. I have to tell you, there's really no way forward here. That's because there's a longstanding Justice Department view that's been in place for many decades, adhered to by Republican and Democratic administrations. You cannot prosecute or try a sitting president of the United States. It's just too destructive to the executive branch. The president is different. He needs to focus on his constitutional duties. And he can't be Bothered the view is with this criminal process. So that case is going to go away probably in early December, if not earlier.
Susan Davis
And is that also true for the classified documents case?
Danielle Kurtzleben
Also?
Susan Davis
A federal case also can prosecute a sitting president for any past crime.
Kerry Johnson
You know what? That policy is certainly true. There's a complication with that documents case, and the complication is that Donald Trump was charged alongside two other people, the guy who was the property manager at Mar A Lago, the resort, and his longtime valet, Walt Nada. And so the Justice Department is going to have to think about whether it wants the case to go away as to all three of those men or just Trump.
Susan Davis
Oh, that's interesting.
Kerry Johnson
I mean, cut and run at this point, it would seem. And then the second complication there is that Judge Eileen Cannon, who was appointed to the bench by Trump, dismissed that prosecution on the first day of the Republican convention in July. And the reasoning that she used could implicate the way other special counsels are appointed and also other people appointed in the government who don't get Senate confirmation. And the Justice Department is very concerned about that. So, you know, they're pretty deliberative men and women over there. They're thinking about what to do. But a lawyer who used to work there told me he thinks that Judge Cannon's ruling is not binding precedent. So it's probably okay to leave that case alone, too, and just let it go away.
Domenico Montanaro
It's kind of amazing that we're talking about President Elect who was convicted of various things related to business fraud and civil cases related to sexual misconduct, and had all these other cases that were even more serious against him, and they're just gonna be basically dropped, essentially because of the complication of being able to try somebody who is a president because it's never happened, and the Supreme Court's only given him more power.
Susan Davis
You can make a political argument that these issues were just litigated in an election and the American public had all this information and they voted to reelect him. And that might supersede the legal process at this point.
Kerry Johnson
Funny enough, that's what former Attorney General Bill Barr had to say this week. And also what Steve Scalise, who the House Majority leader, one of your people, had to say as well. He said this law fair against Trump must end. And it's hard to imagine that people have not heard about any of these four big cases. Of course, we've just been talking about the federal ones. But as Domenico referenced, there are these cases in Georgia, in New York, too. And I expect those to go by the wayside as well. The New York one's a little more complicated. Remember, because Trump was actually tried and convicted by a jury in New York and awaiting sentencing, awaiting sentencing for Thanksgiving week, it's likely that his lawyers are going to seek to make that case a go away before he's even sentenced. On the same ground that, I mean, it was hard to imagine for some people that the former president would ever get a custodial prison sentence anyway. But now it's even more impossible to imagine. And, you know, if the New York courts don't go Trump's way and give him an out, it's likely Trump's lawyers will appeal across the New York court system and eventually up to the U.S. supreme Court. I think it's pretty easy to predict what they'll do with that kind of question. There is one big, outstanding question here, at least with respect to the federal cases, and that's that under the regulations that Jack Smith operates under the special counsel, those people are obliged to write a written report about what they did and why. And so there are now a couple of months, two and a half months left. It's possible that Jack Smith could get some kind of report done. And we know the current Attorney General, Merrick Garland, has pledged to make much, if not all of that public if he can. So it's a little bit of a race against the clock. If Jack Smith wants to, we may get a little more information about what exactly he was up to, both in D.C. and in Florida.
Susan Davis
And we have to also note Georgia, I mean, a state case, but it seems like all these same rules prevail, that at a minimum, it just goes on a back burner and maybe just comes moot.
Kerry Johnson
There are a bunch of things going on with Georgia, not the least of which is the district Attorney, Fani Willis, problems with respect to the personal relationship she had with the guy she hired to prosecute and investigate, as well as some statements she made at a Martin Luther King Day appearance this year that defense lawyers have cried foul about. So the appeals court in Georgia was going to consider all of that in early December. Not clear if that's going to go ahead, even if they determine that Fani Willis can stay on the case. So it's not clear to me how much of the evidence that she's amassed that she's actually going to be able to use, because a lot of that evidence comes from actions. And people in the Trump White House and the Supreme Court seems to say that's not co chair. You can't build a case like that against a president.
Susan Davis
Also would just note Fani Willis was also reelected this week. Carry on, a separate but somewhat related topic. I think one big question we're all looking for now is when it comes to the power of presidential pardons, Donald Trump campaigned very openly that he would consider pardons for any number of people who were convicted in relation to the January 6th attack on the US Capitol. That also includes some prominent far right militia members who are currently sitting in prison and plan to lobby the president to be pardoned.
Kerry Johnson
Absolutely. You know, something like 1,500 people have been charged in connection with January 6, 2021. Some of them are people who just showed up that day and entered the Capitol and then left. Others beat up police officers with flagpoles and bear spray and horrible stuff like that. And still others were considered to be leaders of extremist movements. I'm talking here about Enrique Tarrio of the Proud Boys and Stuart Rhodes of the Oath Keep. Both of those men and their confederates were charged with seditious conspiracy, a very rarely used charge. I covered those trials. Tarrio got 22 years. Stuart Rhodes got 18 years. The judge in the Stewart Rhodes case, who's a very even keeled guy, actually said to Stuart Rhodes during the sentencing that he presents an ongoing threat and peril to the country into the very fabric of democracy. Yesterday, Stuart Rhodes lawyer Lee Bright told me he was going to personally appeal to President Elect Trump to do the right thing and release Stuart Rhodes from prison. And Tarrio's lawyers signaled the same, that they're gonna make a pitch to the president and elect as well.
Susan Davis
I mean, domenico polling would suggest that pardoning these people is very opposed by the American public. But we're gonna find out soon enough whether that matters at all to Donald Trump.
Domenico Montanaro
Yeah. And I mean, I don't think there's been like a lot of deep polling on this. And I think that it's the kind of thing that Trump is happy to message on. I mean, we'll see what decision he winds up making. But the fact is Donald Trump doesn't have politics to worry about anymore, to be totally honest.
Susan Davis
Yeah, he's not running for reelection.
Domenico Montanaro
He's not running for reelection. So that's an interesting thing when you can take a person who has been under scrutiny spotlight, is happy to do controversial things, doesn't have to run and be held accountable for whatever might go wrong or right in another election. And when you have a Supreme Court that, that has taken away a lot of the guardrails where he can essentially do what he wants as long as it's within his official capacity.
Susan Davis
All right, let's take another quick break. And when we get back, can't let it go. The Code Switch team spent Election Day talking to folks about how the outcome might impact them. It's a time capsule of people's hopes and fears before they knew the results.
Danielle Kurtzleben
One way or another, there's a change coming.
Domenico Montanaro
I wanted to vote for Trump, but.
Susan Davis
I've voted for her.
Domenico Montanaro
Gays for Trump.
Susan Davis
I cried this morning.
Kerry Johnson
I've been crying on and off. I'm terrified.
Susan Davis
Listen to Code Switch, the podcast about.
Danielle Kurtzleben
Race and identity from npr.
Kerry Johnson
These days, it can feel like the news is fighting for your attention wherever you turn. But staying informed shouldn't be a battle. Everything you need to navigate the stories that matter to you is at your fingertips. The NPR app cuts through the noise, bringing you local, national and global coverage. No paywalls, no profits, no nonsense. Download the NPR app in your app store today or you can go to npr.org app NPR brings you the updates you need on the day's biggest headlines.
Domenico Montanaro
The Senate narrowly passed the debt ceiling bill that will prevent the country from defaulting on its loans.
Kerry Johnson
Stories from across the world.
Domenico Montanaro
Knowing how to forage and to live.
Danielle Kurtzleben
With the land is integral to anise culture.
Kerry Johnson
And down your block from CPR news.
Susan Davis
This is Colorado Matters, and you can.
Kerry Johnson
Find all of that and more in your pocket. Download the NPR app today.
Susan Davis
And we're back, and it's time to end the week like we always do with Can't Let It Go where we talk about the things we just can't stop thinking about, politics or otherwise. I'm going to go first. The thing I couldn't let go, that I've thought about a lot this week is something spectacular that happened in Pennsylvania. And it might not be what you were thinking on election week, but in the Sunday before the election, in the Eagles game at Lincoln Financial Field, a spectacular, spectacular football play happened by Saquon Barkley, a running back for the Eagles. I don't know if you saw this.
Kerry Johnson
It was amazing.
Susan Davis
He did like a 180 spin and then jumped, did a reverse hurdle over a player trying to tackle him in a move that I, I think at least how people are framing it is one of the most sort of famous moves in NFL history. No one's ever done this before. It's almost physically impossible to do. And one of the things that was amazing about it is when it happened was watching the players on the sidelines, like lose their Minds. Cause it's like when people know how hard it is. But he's gotten a ton of attention and press about it. But one of the things I also thought was funny is he was being interviewed and they were like, oh, do people wanna name it? What do you wanna call it? Is it gonna be like Michael Jordan dunking the basketball? And he was like, no, no, I don't want any of that. And he's like, I don't ever wan.
Kerry Johnson
You could hurt yourself.
Susan Davis
He's like, I don't think that was a good idea. Like, that's not a move I want to try and replicate. But it was a pretty spectacular thing to see.
Domenico Montanaro
I did not play football because I didn't want to get hit. And I understand that Saquon Barkley doesn't want to do that again, but he did it because he didn't want to get hit. And he jumped and got away however he could.
Susan Davis
Carrie, what about you?
Kerry Johnson
My mind turns to Italy often these days, and I don't want to be that person talking about the Roman Empire. And yet there is new information about the city of Pompeii, if you've ever been there.
Domenico Montanaro
No, I have.
Kerry Johnson
A terrible volcano erupted and killed people. And for many decades or hundreds of years, people have been making hunches about who exactly was found and their relationships to each other. And new science, new DNA of some of these people who were basically, like, encased, you know, in the ashes in the volcano, they're figuring out that in one particular location, what they thought was like a nuclear family turned out to people who were not even related to each other and may have tried to comfort each other as this tragedy was occurring. And it just. A, I wanna be in Pompeii right now and having a really good dinner after in Italy. And B, it just goes to show, so many of the things we think we know, we may not know at all.
Susan Davis
Also, that you can still be finding out information about what seems like primordial events, you know?
Kerry Johnson
Exactly. New fact from 79 AD. Justin, Domenico, what about you?
Domenico Montanaro
Monkeys.
Susan Davis
Go on.
Domenico Montanaro
43 monkeys escaped from a research facility in South Carolina. And people are being told to lock their doors, stay inside. Do not approach the monkeys if you see them. Apparently a caretaker forgot to secure, you know, a lock. One of them got out and they said it was like, follow the leader.
Susan Davis
There's a book about this. It's called Good Night Gorilla. Yeah, the zookeeper forgets to.
Domenico Montanaro
Well, there's that, yeah. But there's also movies about it, like Planet. It's a little bit different situation with those monkeys. And they said some of these guys, though, are sticking around and playing games essentially with the caretakers because they're jumping up into trees and then they jump down, take food. When they turn their backs, they jump back into the tree. So they're just really irritated with being in this research facility, and who can blame them, right?
Susan Davis
I'm sort of rooting for the monkeys here.
Domenico Montanaro
Well, just don't go near the monkeys.
Susan Davis
Have they gotten any of the monkeys back or are the monkeys just living free now?
Domenico Montanaro
I don't know. But I was really fascinated to hear how they're trying to track them down. They've set baits, they've set traps, trying to check and find them. Oh, yeah.
Susan Davis
Bet they're harder to find than other lab animals.
Domenico Montanaro
You see all that stuff where the monkeys, like, will steal your money and take your food?
Kerry Johnson
The baboons? Yes. They'll steal your bananas and stuff.
Susan Davis
43 monkeys together might be able to outsmart one human. Their thoughts are in their favor.
Domenico Montanaro
Evolution is a thing, right?
Susan Davis
All right, that is a wrap for us this week. Our executive producer is Bethoni Mitori. Our editor is Eric McDaniel. Our producers are Jung Yoon Han, Casey Morrell and Kelly Wessinger. I'm Susan Davis. I cover politics.
Kerry Johnson
I'm Kerry Johnson. I cover the Justice Department.
Domenico Montanaro
And I'm Domenico Montanaro, senior political editor and correspondent.
Susan Davis
And thanks for listening to the NPR Politics podcast.
The NPR Politics Podcast Episode: Roundup: What Is The Future Of The Cases Against Trump?
In this episode of The NPR Politics Podcast, hosted by Susan Davis, Danielle Kurtzleben, and Domenico Montanaro, the discussion centers on former President Donald Trump's significant electoral victory and the uncertain future of the myriad legal cases against him as he transitions to the role of president-elect.
The episode begins with an analysis of Trump's unprecedented success in the 2024 election. For the first time in his three presidential bids, Trump is on track to win the popular vote in addition to securing the Electoral College. This victory, coupled with the Republican Party's potential control over the House of Representatives, could grant the GOP comprehensive control over Washington's political landscape.
Susan Davis highlights the magnitude of this triumph:
"[Trump] is on track to win the popular vote. And if Republicans hold onto their House majority... his party will have full control of the levers of power in Washington." (01:45)
A significant factor in Trump's victory was the support garnered from specific demographic groups, particularly white voters and men. Domenico Montanaro delves into the statistics:
"71% of the electorate were white voters, and that's the first time that's gone up since 1992... Republicans do so well with white voters generally, that obviously helped Trump." (02:07)
Montanaro further breaks down the support among Latino voters and younger demographics:
"Trump won a record share for a Republican, 46% of Latinos. He won 55% of Latino men." (02:14) "When you look at younger voters 18 to 29, Trump narrowly won younger men, 49 to 47." (02:39)
These shifts indicate that men, especially within Latino and younger age groups, were pivotal in swinging the election in Trump's favor.
The hosts discuss how the Trump and Harris campaigns tailored their messaging to different genders. Susan Davis observes:
"The Trump campaign made a very clear overture to male voters... the same way that Kamala Harris campaign was making overtures to women very much." (03:37)
Danielle Kurtzleben adds nuance to this perspective:
"Men in 2020 chose Trump by 8 points. This year, they chose him by 13 points... women slid 7 points and men slid 5 points." (04:20)
While the Trump campaign effectively mobilized male voters, there was also a noticeable shift among women, albeit not enough to counterbalance the gains made by men.
The discussion shifts to the broader cultural divides influencing voter behavior. Susan Davis posits that the male vote was influenced more by a sense of belonging to the Republican Party rather than specific policies:
"The male vote... doesn't seem like it was driven by clear policies as much as a sense that the Republican Party was just a place that was more welcoming for them." (06:25)
Danielle Kurtzleben concurs, emphasizing negative messaging:
"Trump had a lot of negative messaging to women... putting men at the top of a gender hierarchy." (06:40)
A substantial portion of the episode addresses the numerous legal cases against Trump and their uncertain future given his new status as president-elect.
Kerry Johnson outlines the current state of federal cases:
"Jack Smith... asked the judge in Washington, D.C. for a delay until early December... there's really no way forward here." (11:27)
She elaborates on the longstanding Justice Department stance:
"You cannot prosecute or try a sitting president of the United States... the president is different. He needs to focus on his constitutional duties." (11:31)
Domenico Montanaro reflects on the unprecedented nature of these developments:
"It's kind of amazing that we're talking about President Elect who was convicted of various things... they're just gonna be basically dropped." (13:43)
The conversation extends to state-level cases in Georgia and New York, highlighting additional complexities.
Kerry Johnson discusses Georgia's case:
"The appeals court in Georgia was going to consider all of that in early December. Not clear if that's going to go ahead..." (16:19)
She also touches on the New York case, noting the likelihood of delays or appeals:
"Trump's lawyers are going to seek to make that case go away before he's even sentenced... it's likely Trump's lawyers will appeal across the New York court system." (16:59)
The hosts explore Trump's potential use of presidential pardons, especially concerning individuals charged in the January 6th Capitol attack.
Kerry Johnson provides details:
"1,500 people have been charged in connection with January 6, 2021... Stuart Rhodes got 18 years... Rhodes' lawyer... appeal to President Elect Trump to do the right thing and release Stuart Rhodes from prison." (17:34)
Domenico Montanaro comments on the political ramifications:
"Donald Trump doesn't have politics to worry about anymore... the Supreme Court's only given him more power." (18:48)
The episode concludes by contemplating the balance between legal accountability and political realities. With Trump no longer facing reelection, the usual political checks on presidential behavior may be diminished, raising concerns about executive overreach and the erosion of institutional safeguards.
Susan Davis sums up the tension:
"You can make a political argument that these issues were just litigated in an election... but at this point, justice isn't blind to politics." (14:24)
This episode provides a comprehensive overview of the current political and legal landscape surrounding Donald Trump. It underscores the intricate interplay between electoral success, demographic shifts, campaign strategies, and the legal challenges that may be either postponed or dismissed due to his imminent presidency. The discussion raises critical questions about accountability, the integrity of legal processes, and the future direction of American politics under a Trump administration with substantial control over governmental institutions.
Notable Quotes:
Susan Davis (01:45):
"Trump... his party will have full control of the levers of power in Washington."
Domenico Montanaro (02:07):
"71% of the electorate were white voters... that obviously helped Trump."
Danielle Kurtzleben (04:20):
"Men in 2020 chose Trump by 8 points. This year, they chose him by 13 points."
Kerry Johnson (11:27):
"There's really no way forward here... you cannot prosecute or try a sitting president of the United States."
Domenico Montanaro (13:43):
"They're just gonna be basically dropped."
Kerry Johnson (17:34):
"Rhodes' lawyer... appeal to President Elect Trump to do the right thing and release Stuart Rhodes from prison."
Domenico Montanaro (18:48):
"Donald Trump doesn't have politics to worry about anymore."
Timestamp Reference: The timestamps provided correspond to the transcript segments where each quote occurs.