Trump Rolls Back Federal DEI Rules

Summary

Summary of "Trump Rolls Back Federal DEI Rules" Episode of The NPR Politics Podcast

Release Date: January 22, 2025
Host: Sarah McCammon, with co-hosts Danielle Kurtzleben and Susan Davis

---

1. Introduction

In this episode of The NPR Politics Podcast, host Sarah McCammon, alongside co-hosts Danielle Kurtzleben and Susan Davis, delves into President Donald Trump's recent executive actions aimed at dismantling federal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Additionally, the episode covers the controversial sermon delivered by Bishop Mary Ann Buddy at Washington's National Cathedral, which directly challenged President Trump, eliciting strong reactions from both the administration and the public.

---

2. Trump's Executive Actions on DEI

Key Developments:

President Trump has initiated a series of executive orders focused on rolling back DEI programs within the federal government and influencing private sector practices related to diversity and inclusion.

Notable Quote:

"Ending illegal discrimination and restoring merit-based opportunity," — Danielle Kurtzleben [01:27]

Details:

• Three Major Orders:

  1. Ending "Radical and Wasteful" DEI Programs: Trump characterizes existing DEI initiatives as excessive and unproductive, aiming to curtail federal spending on these programs.

  2. Reforming Federal Hiring Processes: The administration seeks to overhaul hiring practices to prioritize merit-based selection over diversity considerations, alleging that DEI efforts have hindered the recruitment of the most qualified candidates.

  3. Rescinding Past DEI-Focused Executive Orders: This includes revoking longstanding directives, such as the one from President Lyndon B. Johnson, which mandated affirmative action for federal contractors to prevent discrimination and promote diversity.

Notable Quote:

"We will forge a society that is colorblind and merit-based." — Danielle Kurtzleben [01:27]

---

3. Historical Context and Backlash

Historical References:

• Lyndon B. Johnson's Executive Order: Established affirmative action and anti-discrimination measures for federal contractors.

• Ronald Reagan's Attempted Rescission: Reagan previously tried to revoke similar DEI directives but faced opposition from the business community and within his cabinet, highlighting the contentious nature of DEI policies.

Backlash in Corporate America:

• Recent years have seen a significant pushback against DEI initiatives within the private sector, with reports indicating a decline in corporate support for such programs following extensive activism after incidents like the 2020 murder of George Floyd.

• Prominent figures, such as Mark Zuckerberg, have publicly announced the termination of DEI initiatives within their organizations, reflecting a broader conservative shift.

Notable Quote:

"There was extensive reporting about big companies who embraced and expanded initiatives following the 2020 murder of George Floyd." — Susan Davis [05:16]

---

4. Impact on Federal Agencies and the Private Sector

Federal Agencies:

• Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Directives:
  • Placing DEI roles on paid leave.
  • Shutting down DEI program offices.
  • Mandating agencies to devise plans for eliminating DEI positions.

Private Sector Implications:

• The executive order imposes restrictions on private companies receiving federal contracts or grants, prohibiting DEI programs that contravene anti-discrimination laws. However, the lack of a clear definition of "promoting DEI" creates uncertainty about compliance requirements.

Notable Quote:

"Recipients of any government contract or grant cannot operate programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable anti-discrimination laws." — Danielle Kurtzleben [03:21]

---

5. Reactions from Trump and Allies

President Trump's Response:

• Trump criticized Bishop Mary Ann Buddy’s sermon, labeling her remarks as "nasty in tone and not compelling or smart," and demanded an apology. He went as far as suggesting that she "is not very good at her job."

Support from Allies:

• Georgia Republican Representative Mike Collins echoed Trump's sentiments on social media, calling for Bishop Buddy to be added to the "deportation list."

Notable Quotes:

"She was nasty in tone and not compelling or smart. She's not very good at her job." — President Trump [12:47]
"The person giving this sermon should be added to the deportation list." — Rep. Mike Collins [13:30]

---

6. Lack of Democratic Response

Despite the significant changes and the controversies arising from Trump's actions, there has been a minimal and fragmented response from the Democratic Party. Internal disagreements, partly stemming from the party attributing part of their electoral losses to identity and gender politics, have prevented a unified front against the administration's DEI rollbacks.

Notable Quote:

"In the absence of robust opposition, I think that the Trump administration is even more emboldened to push as far as they can." — Susan Davis [07:57]

---

7. National Cathedral Sermon by Bishop Mary Ann Buddy

Event Overview:

At a prayer service held at Washington's National Cathedral, Bishop Mary Ann Buddy delivered a sermon that directly addressed and criticized President Trump's policies, particularly focusing on immigration and the treatment of marginalized communities.

Key Points from the Sermon:

• Compassion for the Vulnerable:

  • Emphasized mercy for individuals fearing for their lives, including LGBTQ+ youths, undocumented immigrants, and workers in essential but precarious jobs.

• Critique of Immigration Policies:

  • Highlighted the contributions of immigrants and challenged the administration's stance on deportation.

Notable Quote from Sermon:

"In the name of our God, I ask you to have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared... the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals. They pay taxes and are good neighbors." — Bishop Mary Ann Buddy [09:15]

---

8. Trump's Reaction to the Sermon

In response to Bishop Buddy's sermon, President Trump took to social media to express his disapproval. He accused her of being a "radical left hardline Trump hater" and demanded an apology, further escalating tensions between the administration and religious leaders.

Implications:

• Public Scrutiny of Religious Figures: The confrontation highlights the delicate balance between religious leadership and political commentary, especially when addressing high-profile figures like the president.

• Potential Retaliation Concerns: Although the National Cathedral operates independently of the government, Trump's aggressive rhetoric raises concerns about possible indirect pressures on religious institutions.

---

9. Implications for Faith-Based Organizations and Immigration Policy

Tensions with Faith-Based Groups:

• Immigration Advocacy: Many faith-based organizations are actively involved in supporting and resettling immigrants and refugees. The administration's rollback of DEI initiatives and harsh immigration policies directly impact these organizations, potentially leading to reduced funding and operational challenges.

• Diverse Religious Opinions: While a significant portion of Trump's support base includes white evangelicals, there is considerable diversity within religious communities regarding immigration and social justice, leading to internal conflicts and varying levels of support or opposition to the administration's policies.

Notable Quote:

"Almost all of them are faith-based organizations and almost all of them are going to have to lay off a lot of people if he shuts off the flow of refugees into the country." — Danielle Kurtzleben [16:52]

---

10. Conclusion

President Trump's recent executive actions to dismantle federal DEI programs represent a significant shift in governmental policy towards diversity and inclusion. These moves not only impact federal agencies but also extend their influence into the private sector, creating uncertainty and tension across various sectors. The lack of a unified Democratic response emboldens the administration to further its agenda. Additionally, the confrontation between President Trump and Bishop Mary Ann Buddy underscores the growing polarization surrounding immigration and DEI policies, highlighting the challenges faith-based organizations face under the current administration. As these developments unfold, their long-term effects on the political and social landscape remain to be seen.

---

Notable References:

• Executive Orders aimed at ending DEI programs and enforcing merit-based hiring.
• Historical context involving Lyndon B. Johnson's and Ronald Reagan's approaches to DEI.
• Reactions from President Trump, Representative Mike Collins, and lack of Democratic unity.
• Bishop Mary Ann Buddy's sermon and subsequent backlash.
• Implications for faith-based organizations and immigration policy.

Timestamp Highlights:

• 01:03-01:45: Introduction to Trump's DEI rollback orders.
• 03:21-05:16: Detailed explanation of the executive orders and their impact.
• 07:12-08:40: Discussion on the implementation challenges and Democratic response.
• 09:11-18:30: Coverage of the National Cathedral sermon, reactions, and implications.

---

This comprehensive summary encapsulates the critical discussions, insights, and conclusions presented in the episode, providing a clear understanding for listeners who have not tuned in.

Transcript

[Wondery Ad]

This message comes from Wondery. In the past decade, Boeing has been involved in a series of scandals and deadly plane crashes that have dented the company's once sterling reputation. Can anything save the company's reputation now? Listen to Business wars wherever you get your podcasts.

[Elliot]

Hi, I'm Elliot. I'm 14 and I'm from Maine.

[Susan Davis]

Currently, I'm getting ready for my midterms at school.

[Sarah McCammon]

This episode was recorded at 1:07pm Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 22, 2025.

[Elliot]

So things may have changed by the time you hear this, but hopefully I'll.

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

Have my midterm results back.

[Elliot]

Wish me luck. Okay, here's the show.

[Susan Davis]

Hey, good luck.

[Sarah McCammon]

I have a feeling you're gonna do great.

[Elliot]

Keep your grades up, kiddo.

[Susan Davis]

I love Maine. Not right now, not at this time of year. It's a little cold for me. But generally speaking, Maine is great.

[Sarah McCammon]

So I'm glad somebody's teenagers are listening to me, even if mine are not. Hey there. It's the NPR Politics podcast. I'm Sarah McCammon.

[Elliot]

I cover politics. I'm Danielle Kurtzleben. I cover the White House.

[Susan Davis]

And I'm Susan Davis. I also cover politics.

[Sarah McCammon]

Today on the pod, more executive actions from President Trump aimed at reshaping the federal government and its policies. Some of his recent actions mean big changes to federal DEI initiatives, something Trump nodded to in his inaugural address this week.

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

I will also end the government policy.

[Bishop Mary Ann Buddy]

Of trying to socially engineer race and.

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

Gender into every aspect of public and private life. We will forge a society that is colorblind and merit based.

[Sarah McCammon]

So let's start there. Daniel, what has the president ordered regarding dei?

[Elliot]

Let's start with some super basics. When we say dei, what that stands for is diversity, equity and inclusion. Now, that's not a term with any sort of structure, strict legal definition as it's usually used in the business world. It refers to, for example, attempts to address discriminatory hiring practices, past practices to try to solve pay inequity. It can refer to anti bias trainings. It can refer to all sorts of things. But of course, it's become deeply politicized as a term DEI in recent years. But three orders to my mind, that Trump has signed really center around dei. There are two that he signed on Monday. One, as he puts it, would end, quote, radical and wasteful government DEI programs. There's another to reform the federal hiring process. Again, those are his words. Which would attempt to, as the order puts it, try to get the most qualified people into government. That order suggests that because of DEI the government hasn't been hiring the most qualified people. And then there's this one from overnight called, quote, ending illegal discrimination and restoring merit based opportunity. That one rescinds further past executive orders aimed at promoting diversity, promoting equality, slash equity in the government. That order really also tries to take aim at the private sector as much as an executive order can.

[Sarah McCammon]

What do we know about it?

[Elliot]

It rescinds a few executive orders. And one of the executive orders that it rescinds is one from lbj, Lyndon Baines Johnson. And that LBJ order, interestingly, really took aim at federal contractors. It said that contractors, you know, can't discriminate based on race, creed, color, national origin. But it also said contractors will, quote, take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to race, creed, color, et cetera. And so you have an executive order that is calling for some sort of affirmative action, which is another sort of dirty word or couple of words in the conservative movement right now and has been for a while. This is an executive order that Reagan tried to rescind and failed after he got some pushback from the business community and within his own cabinet, including the labor secretary at the time. But what is also really interesting about this order is how much it tries to impose some sort of power on the private sector, not just the federal government. One of the things it requires is that the recipients of any government contract or grant cannot operate programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable anti discrimination laws. Now, that is unclear. And that is one reason why it's going to take a while for us to understand what this order means, because determining what exactly it means to promote dei, who knows right now? And this order doesn't lay that out, but to say if you want to receive a government grant or contract, and there are a lot of companies and millions of people employed by those companies for those companies to receive federal awards and to not be able to, quote, implement dei. What does that mean? Who knows? But that is really a huge effort to try to impose power upon private companies.

[Susan Davis]

Although I also think we should note, and I think in the broader context of this, to take a step back. This backlash has been happening in the private sector already in the past year or more. There was extensive reporting about big companies who embraced and expanded initiatives following the 2020 murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis at the hands of police. There was a robust national and corporate movement to feed and fuel these programs. And we've seen the backlash to that happening organically in corporate America. You saw even just with Metis executive Mark Zuckerberg announcing all the end of all DEI initiatives there. I think part of this movement is being fueled on the right by the Supreme Court challenge that ultimately ruled against affirmative action race based admission practices in education. And it's part of a broader conservative push to sort of eliminate. I think we say di, but I think prior to that we would probably say affirmative action or affirmative action like programs throughout government and use activist pressure to make the private sector follow suit.

[Sarah McCammon]

Danielle, what is Trump directing federal agencies to do here?

[Elliot]

Well, the Office of Management and Budget, often called OMB for short, is directing US Agencies to put staff in DEI roles on paid leave. And they're also saying that all federal DEI program offices should be shut down now. Furthermore, that order has told different agencies to come up with a plan to get rid of those DEI workers.

[Susan Davis]

And I think that's a good point that raises some of these complicating questions we're talking about because many of these federal workers are protected by civil union protections. So it's not necessarily super easy to just say, oh, you worked in dei, you're fired. I would note, however, that if you are federal workers who work in this space that this is your career specialty if you are being told that the federal government no longer wants these services. I think part of the hopeful effect from the Trump administration's point of view is that some of these workers will willingly quit or leave and get at that reduction in force by any means necessary.

[Sarah McCammon]

I mean, do we know how these changes are actually going to work? I mean, some of these policies and programs have been around for a while, haven't they?

[Elliot]

The long story short is that a lot of these executive orders, the devil is in the details and in what the knock on effects are. For example, do different agencies of the government decide they want to change regulations and how regulations take a while to change. Besides that, some of these executive orders call for, for example, the attorney general or the head of this department or that department within 120 days to please submit a report on XYZ. So some of these we're going to have to wait for those 120 days to pass before we know what's going to happen.

[Susan Davis]

I think it's worth noting here that there isn't much of a robust response right now coming from the Democratic Party. I think the opposition party is still reeling a bit from an election in which depending who you talk to in the party, have varying degrees of blame towards identity and gender politics for costing them this election. And I don't think that there is a sort of a unified front in the Democratic Party to push back on this or defend these programs. They're trying to figure that out. And in the absence of robust opposition, I think that the Trump administration is even more emboldened to push as far as they can if the opposing party isn't willing to fight it with as much force, which they don't seem all that inclined to do right now. Okay.

[Sarah McCammon]

We're going to take a quick break, but we'll be back in just a moment.

[Susan Davis]

Wait, wait, don't tell me.

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

Fresh Air up first, NPR News.

[Susan Davis]

Now, Planet Money TED Radio Hour Throughline.

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

The NPR Politics podcast Code Switch Embedded.

[Susan Davis]

Books we love Wild Card are just.

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

Some of the podcasts you can enjoy.

[Susan Davis]

Sponsor free with NPR.

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

Get all sorts of perks across more.

[Susan Davis]

Than 20 podcasts with the bundle option. Learn more at plus.NPR.org and we're back.

[Sarah McCammon]

And NPR religion correspondent Jason DeRose is joining us now. Hey, Jason.

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

Hello.

[Sarah McCammon]

So I want to talk to you about the prayer service yesterday at Washington's National Cathedral. The first and second families were there in the pews, and part of the sermon from Bishop Mary Ann Buddy drew attention as well as the ire of President Trump.

[Bishop Mary Ann Buddy]

In the name of our God, I ask you to have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared. Now, there are gay, lesbian and transgender children in Democratic, Republican and independent families, some who fear for their lives. And the people, the people who pick our crops and clean our office buildings, who labor in poultry farms and meatpacking plants, who wash the dishes after we eat in restaurants and work the night shifts in hospitals, they they may not be citizens or have the proper documentation, but the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals. They pay taxes and are good neighbors.

[Sarah McCammon]

Jason, we're going to talk about what she said there. But first of all, just who is Marianne Buddy?

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

Well, Buddy is the Episcopal bishop of the diocese of Washington, D.C. which means she is the pastor to the pastors of the diocese there. So she was elected in 2011 and has overseen all of the clergy in that diocese, which is not just Washington, D.C. itself, but sort of parts around Washington, D.C. as well.

[Sarah McCammon]

Now, this post inaugural service, it's a tradition. It's not necessarily the kind of thing that always grabs headlines. But how does this work? I mean, the preacher, there isn't usually someone associated with the cathedral, right?

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

Well, usually the incoming president has a lot of say into who is talking at that service. So if you think back to the Biden service, Reverend William Barber, the leader of the poor People's Campaign was one of the preachers, and he gave a sermon that you know, really lifted up what Biden had been talking about during the campaign. However, this year, the National Cathedral said that it wanted to depoliticize the service, and so it took control over who was preaching at the service. And so it would make sense that the Episcopal Diocese of Washington would have its bishop preach at that service.

[Sarah McCammon]

And we heard those words from the bishop directed to the president. What do we know about what the reaction was like at that moment inside the cathedral?

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

Well, he was sitting in the front pew, and during her sermon, she looked right at him and said, you. She used the word you several times. And I think that that was. You know, I would call that a confrontation. Now, it may not have been a physical confrontation, but it's definitely a confrontation. You know, I don't know if you've ever been called out from a pulpit.

[Sarah McCammon]

But I think I would have sunk into the pew.

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

Well, I, I have not been called out from a pulpit, at least while I was sitting in the church. And, you know, it's, it's probably quite alarming for anybody that happens to. So, you know, you could see a little discomfort in the front pew and in the pew behind him where some of Trump's family was also sitting, some side eye, some looking back and forth. But there wasn't any sort of outspoken rebuttal. I mean, there wouldn't be a rebuttal to a sermon in a worship service.

[Sarah McCammon]

Right. But, Danielle, the president did eventually respond, right? I mean, what did he have to say?

[Elliot]

Yeah, well, he and his allies are upset, as you might guess. Trump's response came on social media overnight, and it is very Trumpy in tone. He calls the bishop a radical left hardline Trump hater. And he says, quote, she was nasty in tone and not compelling or smart. Nasty being a word we have heard from him before. He finished it off saying, she's not very good at her job. She and her church owe the public an apology. But he's not the only one who has responded. Among others is Georgia Republican Representative Mike Collins, who yesterday posted on social media network X, quote, the person giving this sermon should be added to the deportation list. I mean, it's just. It's really gotten people very fired up and very angry.

[Susan Davis]

Although, to be fair, I don't think in any situation where you have a pastor speaking at such a high profile political event, to me, the pastor is always sort of inherently a political figure. And by that I would include the pastors that spoke at Trump's inaugural ceremonies in the US Capitol, in which many made what I think people could interpret as political comments supporting the president and being God's will that Donald Trump won again. And I think that she had an opportunity and she used it in a political way. I don't say that in a negative regard. I think that's just a fact. She had a national platform to do it. I think she knew what she was going to do. She went and also did media interviews after, where she acknowledged that, yes, she wanted to send a message directly to the president. So I think she knew full well what it would provoke. And I think that was by design. And I would just say this. I do think when it comes to Donald Trump, obviously he has a huge amount of support among the evangelical movement, especially among white evangelicals. But on the issue of immigration, which the pastor in this scenario raised, I do think the overlap between religious activism and immigration policy is going to be a very real tension point in the Trump administration because so many of the people advocating for and helping, like Hands On, Helping undocumented and immigrant communities, are faith based organizations and are very much opposed to what the Trump administration is trying to do. And I think that she was maybe just drawing the first battle line in what is gonna be a number of clergy sort of criticizing the Trump administration, which as we speak, is about to unroll dramatic and vast deportation forces.

[Sarah McCammon]

Yeah. And those faith based groups come from across the religious spectrum and include in some cases evangelical groups, who in some cases have pushed back against Trump's statements about immigrants in the past.

[Elliot]

That's very true. I mean, as we talk about this, I think about this conversation I had way back in 2016, ahead of the Iowa caucuses. I was in northwestern Iowa, which is the most conservative, white, evangelical heavy part of the state. And I was at a campaign event and I talked to a pastor, and the pastor told me, I am the head of a very conservative church. It's a white evangelical church. And he said, my entire congregation loves Trump. They love Ted Cruz, the Texas senator, who at the time was running for president, also on an anti immigration platform. And the pastor said, I just agree with my congregation. And he invoked a Bible verse about welcoming the stranger. It's a verse from one of the Gospels. And that is a way that many Christians, clearly not all, but many Christians do feel about immigration.

[Sarah McCammon]

You know, this points, I think, to a larger and really long standing divide in religion and politics. Sue mentioned the inaugural ceremony. Trump himself said that he feels he was saved by God from his first assassination. Attempt in order to make America great again. And then last year when he was promoting the sale of that Bible, the one he attached his name to, he said he wanted to bring God back to the public square and that Christians should, quote, not allow the media or the left wing groups to silence, censor or discriminate against us. And you know, Bishop Buddy's message of loving your neighbor, of compassion, of caring for those on the margins, that is also part and parcel of a lot of religious thought. Trump is now calling on her to apologize for that. So how do you sort of square that circle?

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

He mostly spends time listening to the fact that, you know, 80% of white evangelicals voted for him, but among other faith groups, it's much less lopsided. It's not 50 50, but there is still a large percentage of people on the political left who are people of faith. So I think that he can't just simply say that people of faith feel one way, although his greatest support is from people who feel one way about their religion. But, you know, in thinking about, especially around immigration and refugee issues, if you look at the organizations that resettle refugees in the United States, almost all of them are faith based organizations and almost all of them are going to have to lay off a lot of people if he shuts off the flow of refugees into the country. So these are issues that churches, faith based organizations are deeply, deeply involved in across the political spectrum. But I would not be surprised if the religious left started to be more vocal like Bishop Buddy was with their comments yesterday.

[Sarah McCammon]

One more question for you, Jason. As I mentioned, the president has called on Bishop Buddy to apologize to him. Does he have any oversight over the National Cathedral? Is there any way in which he could retaliate against her?

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

He has no oversight over the National Cathedral. It may be called the National Cathedral, but it's really just the Episcopal Cathedral of the diocese of Washington, D.C. it's not run by the United States. It's run by the Episcopal Church. And so, you know, she was duly elected and will serve until she chooses to retire. I would actually be surprised if she apologized considering she has gone on multiple TV shows to talk about why she said what she said and to defend it.

[Sarah McCammon]

All right. NPR's Jason DeRose. Thanks so much for your reporting.

[Danielle Kurtzleben]

You're welcome.

[Sarah McCammon]

And that's all from us today. I'm Sarah McCammon. I cover politics.

[Elliot]

I'm Danielle Kurtzleben. I cover the White House.

[Susan Davis]

I'm Susan Davis. I also cover politics.

[Sarah McCammon]

And thank you for listening to the NPR Politics podcast.

[Wondery Ad]

This message comes from Grammarly. At an enterprise level, nothing is more important than communication. Grammarly for Enterprise enables your team to work smarter and faster. Other AI tools can quantify business impact, but Grammarly gives you actionable insights and measurable results with features like their Effective Communication Score, which tracks key metrics so you can make data driven decisions to improve outcomes. Learn [e-mail] Enterprise Listen to this podcast.

[Elliot]

Sponsor free on Amazon Music with a Prime membership or any podcast app by subscribing to NPR [e-mail] that's plus.NPR.org.