Trump Sentenced: No Jail Time, No Fine

Summary

Podcast Summary: "Trump Sentenced: No Jail Time, No Fine"
The NPR Politics Podcast
Release Date: January 10, 2025

---

Introduction

In the January 10, 2025 episode of The NPR Politics Podcast, NPR's political correspondents delve into the landmark sentencing of former President Donald Trump in the New York hush money case. As the nation stands on the brink of witnessing Trump's reentry into the White House, the podcast explores the legal intricacies, political ramifications, and broader implications of this unprecedented event. Additionally, the episode examines the evolving "election integrity movement" and concludes with personal reflections from the hosts.

---

Trump Sentenced: Details and Implications

The episode opens with a significant development in Donald Trump's legal battles. Asma Khalid introduces the primary focus:

"Today on our weekly roundup, we are gonna start the show with news that this morning President elect Donald Trump was Sen. Sentenced in that New York hush money case."
[01:21]

Domenico Montanaro provides a detailed account of the sentencing:

"Judge Juan Merchan in New York basically sentenced Trump to nothing. No requirement to report to the probation office, no incarceration, no financial fines. But Trump walks away a convicted felon."
[02:05]

This sentencing is particularly symbolic as Trump is set to take the oath of office in just ten days, marking the first instance of a current or former U.S. president being tried on criminal charges.

---

Legal Arguments and Supreme Court's Role

The conversation shifts to the legal maneuvers surrounding the case. Asma Khalid inquires about Trump's legal strategies:

"And he can legally do that?"
[02:49]

Montanaro elaborates on Trump's right to appeal and his arguments against the verdict:

"Trump is saying the jurors never should have heard that information and the whole case should be thrown out on that basis."
[03:45]

A pivotal moment discussed is Trump's last-minute attempt to involve the Supreme Court to delay sentencing:

"This was a last ditch bid that Trump and his lawyer John Sauer and his lawyer Todd Blanche put into the Supreme Court to try to delay the sentencing..."
[04:00]

The Supreme Court, in a narrow 5-4 decision, denied Trump's request, effectively upholding the sentencing. Notably, four justices—Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh—appeared to side with Trump, signaling a potential shift towards greater presidential power and limited judicial intervention.

---

Political Repercussions and Analysis

Miles Parks offers a critical analysis of the Supreme Court's stance:

"The past year has shown that the president is indeed, if not above the law, completely has massive protections that regular people certainly don't have."
[05:25]

Asma Khalid probes into the political fallout:

"Do you see any political repercussions to this sentencing?"
[06:44]

Parks responds by highlighting the duality of Trump's position:

"Trump doesn't want to have on his record that he's a convicted felon... But he campaigned with this as a badge of honor."
[07:10]

The discussion underscores the complex interplay between Trump's legal challenges and his political ambitions, emphasizing the unprecedented nature of his situation.

---

Election Integrity Movement

Shifting gears, the podcast delves into the "election integrity movement." Asma Khalid introduces Miles Parks, who has extensively covered this topic.

Carrie Johnson explains the evolution of the movement:

"It's really motivated by this idea that elections are being stolen and things need to kind of be wholesale changed as opposed to tweaked."
[13:51]

The movement, primarily driven by former President Trump's unfounded claims of election fraud, seeks stringent voting regulations, including proof of citizenship for voters. Johnson critiques the movement's assertions:

"There is oversight of ever election in 2020... there were investigations led by Republicans that found the elections to be accurate."
[14:07]

Parks provides a skeptical viewpoint:

"They assume that this election was perfectly clean and went well, but that 2020 wasn't."
[14:19]

The hosts discuss the potential impacts of the movement's agenda on voting accessibility, particularly among marginalized communities, and the ongoing efforts to legislate more restrictive voting measures.

---

Personal Reflections and 'Can't Let It Go' Segment

In the concluding segment, "Can't Let It Go," the hosts share personal reflections on events and topics that have left a lasting impression.

Miles Parks discusses the ceremonial interactions at former President Carter's funeral:

"What I can't let go of is the seating arrangements and... the really weird, cartoonish interactions that you saw between the presidents and their families."
[21:30]

Carrie Johnson shares her enthusiasm for a new rapper:

"I don't know exactly, but... I have a new favorite rapper... it's truly a breathtaking performance."
[23:11]

Asma Khalid expresses concern over natural disasters in Southern California:

"What has been genuinely hard for me to let go of this week have been the apocalyptic pictures out of the west coast of Southern California."
[24:54]

These personal anecdotes provide a humanizing glimpse into the hosts' lives amidst the political discourse.

---

Conclusion

The episode of The NPR Politics Podcast offers a comprehensive analysis of Donald Trump's unprecedented sentencing, the legal strategies employed, and the broader implications for presidential accountability. Additionally, it scrutinizes the "election integrity movement," highlighting the tension between safeguarding electoral processes and ensuring voting accessibility. Through informed discussions and personal insights, the hosts illuminate the complex landscape of contemporary American politics, providing listeners with a nuanced understanding of the events shaping the nation.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps:

• Domenico Montanaro on Trump's sentencing:
  "Judge Juan Merchan in New York basically sentenced Trump to nothing. No requirement to report to the probation office, no incarceration, no financial fines. But Trump walks away a convicted felon."
  [02:05]

• Miles Parks on Trump's legal protections:
  "The past year has shown that the president is indeed, if not above the law, completely has massive protections that regular people certainly don't have."
  [05:25]

• Carrie Johnson on election oversight skepticism:
  "There is oversight of ever election in 2020... there were investigations led by Republicans that found the elections to be accurate."
  [14:07]

• Asma Khalid on natural disasters:
  "What has been genuinely hard for me to let go of this week have been the apocalyptic pictures out of the west coast of Southern California."
  [24:54]

---

This summary encapsulates the critical discussions and insights presented in the episode, providing listeners and readers with a clear and detailed overview of the topics covered.

Transcript

[NPR Sponsor]

Support for NPR and the following message come from IXL Learning. IXL Learning uses advanced algorithms to give the right help to each kid, no matter the age or personality. Get an exclusive 20% off IXL membership when you sign up [e-mail] NPR.

[Sam Bugler]

My name is Sam Bugler and I'm with a group from Drake University in Washington, D.C. and we are currently standing outside of the Supreme Court Court waiting to hopefully hear the oral arguments against the TikTok ban. It is 911 and we have been waiting here for an hour and a half. But this podcast was recorded at 12:38pm.

[Asma Khalid]

On Friday, January 10th of 2025.

[Sam Bugler]

Things may have changed by the time you hear this.

[Carrie Johnson]

Now.

[Sam Bugler]

Enjoy the show.

[Domenico Montanaro]

That poor cold soul had to stand.

[Asma Khalid]

Outside for a Hopefully they got in.

[Domenico Montanaro]

Yeah.

[Miles Parks]

And it's gonna be really interesting oral arguments. I mean, there's been a real decline in the number of people who are saying that they think that TikTok should be banned and more young people actually getting their news from TikTok. So it's gonna be a big change.

[Asma Khalid]

All right. Well, hey, there it is, the NPR Politics Podcast. I'm Asma Khalid. I cover the White House.

[Domenico Montanaro]

I'm Carrie Johnson. I cover the Justice Department.

[Miles Parks]

And I'm Domenico Montanaro, senior political editor and correspondent.

[Asma Khalid]

And today on our weekly roundup, we are gonna start the show with news that this morning President elect Donald Trump was Sen. Sentenced in that New York hush money case.

[Carrie Johnson]

Yes. Thank you, your honor. This has been a very terrible experience. I think it's been a tremendous setback for New York and the New York court system.

[Asma Khalid]

Trump did not receive any punishment and he will not spend any time in jail. But the sentencing itself is symbolic. We are just 10 days away from seeing Trump take the oath of office to reenter the White House. And this marks the first time that any former, current or future president has been tried on criminal charges. Kerry, what did the judge exactly rule this morning?

[Domenico Montanaro]

Judge Juan Merchan in New York basically sentenced Trump to nothing. No requirement to report to the probation office, no incarceration, no financial fines. But Trump walks away a convicted felon. And he also, you know, has faced justice at the hands of a jury of New Yorkers as he once was, people who convicted him last year of 34 criminal charges as part of this hush money scheme to cover up his alleged affair with Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election rolled around. And so that is a verdict for history, although Trump will be appealing, he said today, and he will be appealing, I guess, from his perch in the White House.

[Asma Khalid]

And he can legally do that?

[Domenico Montanaro]

Absolutely. It's his right to appeal. And some people think he may actually have a good chance. Trump is arguing a couple of things. One is that it was an undue burden for him to have to deal with this while he was preparing to reenter the White House in his transition. And the second was that the New York jury who convicted him last year, those jurors heard evidence that should have been out of bounds because presidents have some immunity. The Supreme Court told us they have some immunity for their official acts. And even though the heart of this scheme in which Trump was convicted for these hush money payments, happened before Trump took office in 2016, the jury heard some evidence from people like Hope Hicks and Madeleine Westerhout, who were aides to Trump in the White House. And Trump is saying the jurors never should have heard that information and the whole case should be thrown out on that basis.

[Asma Khalid]

Kerry, I want to also ask you about this request that Trump had. He asked the Supreme Court to essentially squash this ruling. Obviously, they didn't decide to ultimately do that, but what was he asking them to do? And how do you interpret the Supreme Court's decision?

[Domenico Montanaro]

Yeah, this was a last ditch bid that Trump and his lawyer John Sauer and his lawyer Todd Blanche put into the Supreme Court try to delay the sentencing that occurred today. And late yesterday, we heard the Supreme Court come out with just a couple of paragraphs denying the idea that they would intervene and make this sentencing go away for Trump. Interestingly enough, this was a 5 to 4 decision by the court. And the court majority basically said, you know, any issues with the evidence the jury heard about Hope Hicks and Madeline Westerhout, that can be heard on appeal. We can deal with that later. And then secondly, the court majority said, this really is not going to be a major burden for Trump to appear. Virtually, he didn't even have to go to the courthouse in New York. And also because the judge had already signaled a week before that Trump wasn't really going to face any consequences. No prison time, no jail time, no fines, no requirement to do drug tests in the White House, none of that. The kind of wild thing for legal scholars was that four justices appear to have sided with Trump and would have intervened in an extraordinary way in this case. And those were Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Justice Neil Gorsuch, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh. And the thinking there is, you know, usually at this kind of stage, the Supreme Court would only really weigh in if there were like some kind of seriously Irreparable harm coming down the pike.

[Miles Parks]

There were four criminal cases that Trump was facing. This was seen as the least consequential, potentially, of them all and is really the only one that came to full fruition, you know, and you have a Supreme Court that now leans heavily toward unfettered, essentially presidential power. People used to. No one is above the law, not even the president. Well, I think the past year has shown that the president is indeed, if not above the law, completely has massive protections that regular people certainly don't have. And, you know, I mean, if you go even bigger than that, I mean, the founders in this country wanted to break away from a monarchy. Instead, we wind up with sort of a pseudo king, you know, two systems of justice a lot of people talk about one for the rich and poor, one for the privileged and unprivileged. We really have three, it seems, because if you get to the point where your power is so great that you're above, above even the rich and powerful in this country, where you're the president, you have your own judicial system that's now been carved out, something that we hadn't seen really post Richard Nixon, because he resigned. And it's really now sort of the coda on the end of what happened. To start with the Nixon Watergate crisis and not having that settled then, it certainly seems to have been settled now, where you have a Supreme Court that's more conservative and leaning toward unilateral power for a president.

[Asma Khalid]

Domenico, do you see any political repercussions to this sentencing?

[Miles Parks]

Well, I mean, Trump won the election, so the political consequences are already have already happened. I think that Trump doesn't want to have on his record that he's a convicted felon, and that's part of why he is continuing to fight this. He doesn't like that asterisk being next to his name.

[Asma Khalid]

But didn't he campaign heavily off of it as well?

[Miles Parks]

He did. So that's the irony is that he campaigned with this as a badge of honor. But in reality, he doesn't want this to be something that sticks. He's tried everything he possibly can. And frankly, he should be thanking his legal team because they were able to get about as good an outcome as could possibly be gotten for an individual.

[Domenico Montanaro]

His legal team and the Supreme Court, which helped him along the way, most notably in that immunity decision last year. And in fact, Asma, this week, we had another data point about Donald Trump and the Supreme Court. That's that Trump actually had a phone call this week with Justice Samuel Alito. We have not heard about this before. It was reported within 20, 24 hours, the phone call. ABC News reported it. And then the Supreme Court confirmed in a statement from Justice Alito that he and Trump talked. Because Alito says Trump is thinking about hiring one of his former clerks, a guy named William Levy. Levy was a top aide to Bill Barr in the Trump Justice Department. And we know Donald Trump is really leery of Bill Barr. They really went crosswise toward the end of the administration. And apparently Trump wanted to make sure that Levy was both qualified and loyal. So he had to talk to, to Justice Alito. Justice Alito seemed to have thought this was a perfectly fine interaction. He said he didn't know at the time Trump was going to go to the Supreme Court in this last ditch bid to delay sentencing in New York. But certainly there's been a lot of criticism of the justice for taking that phone call and then deciding to vote on the Trump bid.

[Asma Khalid]

Delay in ways that's favorable for Trump. Yeah. Carrie, I want to shift gears ever so slightly and ask you about a somewhat related issue, and that is that many members of Trump's personal legal team are now expected to take jobs in the incoming administration. And there seems to be a lot of blurring of lines between Trump's personal legal world and his political orbit. How do you make sense of that?

[Domenico Montanaro]

Yeah, it's remarkable how many lawyers who work for Donald Trump in their private capacity as a client are gonna have major league jobs in the Justice Department and elsewhere in the government. Starting with Pam Bondi, the former Florida Attorney General who was defending Trump and advancing some of his baseless election fraud claims several years back. She's in line to be the Attorney General. Her confirmation hearing is in the Senate next week. And next up is Todd Blanche, who actually stood next to Donald Trump today on that zoom for the sentencing and who told Judge Merchan that they would be appealing. Todd Blanch is in line to be the Deputy Attorney General. That's the second in command at the Justice Department. That's a major responsibility. He's in charge of the criminal function. People who are in charge of the FBI and the DEA and the ATF report to Todd Blanche if he's confirmed as the deputy. And Blanche's right hand man is Emil Bovey, who's another of Trump's lawyers. And then finally, we have a guy named John Sauer. John Sauer is the nominee, the prospective nominee for Trump to be the Solicitor General of the United States. And in the meantime, he's been filing petitions with the Supreme Court and briefs with the Supreme Court advancing Trump's personal interest in the New York case and in other matters as well. So all those fellows. And then separately, it just came out in the last several days that a gentleman named Stanley Woodward, a lawyer here in Washington, who represented a number of January 6th Capitol riot defendants, including one accused of seditious conspiracy. Stanley Woodward also has defended Walt Nauta, Trump's right hand man and valet in Mar? A Lago. Stanley Woodward is going to be a lawyer and an advisor to Donald Trump in the White House. And here we have lawyers not only being nominated from Trump's legal team, but people who have continued to stand beside him and represent, represent him at the Supreme Court level even after they've been announced as his nominees.

[Asma Khalid]

All right. Thanks, Carrie. We're gonna let you go.

[Domenico Montanaro]

Thank you.

[Asma Khalid]

And let's take a quick break and we'll be back in a moment.

[Sam Bugler]

This message comes from NPR sponsor Sadva founder and CEO Ron Rudson shares the story of how he got started creating Satva.

[NPR Sponsor]

In 2007, 2008, I went out and.

[Miles Parks]

I bought the most popular luxury mattresses.

[NPR Sponsor]

I tore them apart and I realized based on the raw materials, cost and the analysis that I had done that.

[Carrie Johnson]

I was able to sell that level mattress but with a very affordable price.

[Sam Bugler]

To learn more, go to saatva.com NPR.

[NPR Sponsor]

This message comes from Spectrum Business. Small business owners put in unlimited hours, unlimited effort and unlimited passion. Why? Because only you know that your business has unlimited potential. That's why Spectrum Business provides fast, reliable Internet, advanced WI fi with security shield and an unlimited mobile line, all for one low price, built to work for a small business budget. Connect your business to unlimited possibilities. Learn [e-mail] business this message comes from.

[Sam Bugler]

NPR sponsor Rosetta Stone, an expert in language learning for 30 years. Right now, NPR listeners can get Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership to 25 different languages for 50% off. Learn [e-mail] NPR.

[Asma Khalid]

And we're back. And we're joined now by Miles Parks who covers voting for us here at npr. Hey there, Myles.

[Carrie Johnson]

Hi, Asma.

[Asma Khalid]

So you have been reporting on the so called election integrity movement. I know you've been doing a lot of stories around this. I just want you to explain, though, what this term means. Who makes up this movement?

[Carrie Johnson]

Yeah, absolutely. So you know, for decades there's been kind of partisan differences in elections generally on the right. You know, you have Republicans have been more in favor of restrict voting policies, you know, things like photo id, things like that Democrats, the left has prioritized things that make generally voting easier. Now since 2020, I would say there's kind of a third column, this election integrity movement, which is really motivated, still kind of on the right, but really motivated by this idea that elections are not just things you should be skeptical of, but that you are certain they are stolen and that policies need to be based around this idea that elections are being stolen and things need to kind of be wholesale changed as opposed to tweaked. And I think one of the leaders of the movement who I've done a lot of reporting in this piece looks at is somebody named Cleta Mitchell, who listeners might remember was on that famous phone call after 2020 when Donald Trump asked Brad Raffensperger, the Secretary of State of Georgia, to try to find votes. She has become very influential in crafting this election integrity movement since 2020.

[Asma Khalid]

So these are folks on the right, but they are further to the right than where Republicans are around voting issues.

[Carrie Johnson]

Exactly. I would say that for a long time Republicans have been more skep of the elections process, but these are people who have really a lot of them only got interested in elections after 2020 and therefore their worldview around voting is really driven by Donald Trump's lies about the election system.

[Miles Parks]

I find it interesting that the election integrity folks, which is really just a euphemism really, it's amazing to me that they think that I assume that this election was perfectly clean and went well, but that 2020 wasn't.

[Asma Khalid]

I mean, is that true? They do think this past election was fair.

[Carrie Johnson]

One of the most interesting aspects of this to me is that. That yes, I would say that is true. Which some people would say that's outcome dependent. Right. That Donald Trump did very well. But what I was emailing with Khalida Mitchell and their argument is actually that they became more involved after 2020 and that is why the 2024 election was secure is because there were all these people who got interested in elections and interested in election oversight.

[Miles Parks]

So this is a big country, we have a decentralized election system. How true is what she's saying? Cuz it strikes me that it's not very true.

[Carrie Johnson]

You're right. When you talk to experts, it's not true that the administration of this there. It's true that there were more people and there was more oversight. Probably there were more people interested in elections in 2024 maybe than ever before. But the actual there were. There is oversight of ever election in 2020. There were numerous. How many audits did we Report on how many reports led by Republicans. I always go back to this idea that there were in every single swing state there were investigations led by Republicans that found the elections to be accurate. So no, this idea that 2020 is stolen in 2024 was fair because this isn't true. But it is true that there more, more citizens involved.

[Asma Khalid]

Miles, if their assessment is that 2024 was fair and that the elections were, were run fairly smoothly, then what's next on the group's agenda?

[Carrie Johnson]

It does not seem like they are slowing down. I think that is another interesting aspect to me. We acquired this audio, so it's of a panel at a meeting of alec, which is this conservative group that helps draft state level legislation. And we got the audio from the watchdog group documented, which passed it along. And to be clear, it was secretly recorded. And so we're able to get this insight into what people in this election integrity movement are telling state conservative, state lawmakers. And one of the big things is that non citizen voting, which we heard a lot from Trump, from Elon Musk, this was a huge issue leading up to 2024. That's not going away in 2025, that the election integrity movement still wants proof of citizenship, which is a very controversial idea in the voting community, basically requiring people to either show a birth certificate, a passport, documentary proof of citizenship to be able to register, vote. Currently to register to vote in this country, most people use a driver's license. So most people do have their citizenship verified in some way. But there's no official requirement that you need to show documentary proof of citizenship. You have to check a box that says you could be arrested, you could be deported if you lie about this. And there's never been evidence that non citizens are voting in anything but very minuscule numbers in the U.S. but the election integrity community is really pushing for these sorts of more stringent requirements, which many experts, voting experts say would have a huge impact on communities of color, older voters, people who generally have less access. Surveys have shown people who have less access to these sorts of documents.

[Asma Khalid]

Miles, have you seen any efforts to try to rewrite the events of the 2020 election?

[Carrie Johnson]

One of the other topics that came up in the this meeting that I wanted to touch on is all the panelists talked about pushing the lawmakers not to pass legislation that protects election workers. And so if you think about that post 2020, there's been a wide documentation of this sort of like increased harassment and threat landscape for local voting officials on this panel. All of the panelists talked about this threat environment for local voting officials as being a narrative, as being made up. And so you can hear Sharon Bemis, who works on Cleta Mitchell' organization, talk about this here.

[Domenico Montanaro]

So many of us are familiar with the threat narrative that has been very prominent. I think you'll find, in your states that is unfounded. If you ask for police reports related to threats against your election administrators, I think you'll find that it's very rare.

[Carrie Johnson]

And so she talked about explicitly telling the conservative lawmakers in this room, do not pass any legislation that adds new protections to voting officials because it keeps this idea that voting officials are under attack kind of in the mainstream.

[Miles Parks]

So do they want to make it easier to threaten election workers?

[Carrie Johnson]

They would say no. I mean, they would say that these people already have enough protections that they're regular citizens, that it's already illegal to assault a person. Like, if I just punch you in the face, it's illegal for me to do that. And so you being a voting official doesn't change that. But I do think it's the opposite. Point right. Is like, then what's the harm in passing new protections for these people, considering more than 20 people have been arrested for threatening violence against voting officials since 2020? You know, we've heard countless Republicans, Democrats, voting officials, talk about the fact that this environment has changed. So that is not, not a debatable fact. But we are seeing a preview, going to your point, Asma, of what's coming in 2025. I think in terms of the rewrite of what happened in 2020 and the post and following that election, it falls.

[Asma Khalid]

Into this larger just reimagining of base facts and information and evidence that we've seen so routinely in the last several years. Miles, do you have any final takeaways from the 2024 election?

[Carrie Johnson]

I think the biggest takeaway for me, all that matters at this point is how the candidates who ran in that race talk about it. And we saw Kamala Har accept defeat quickly concede in that election. And we saw Donald Trump stop spreading lies after it became clear he was going to win. And we see now that wide majorities of Democrats and Republicans trust the process.

[Miles Parks]

Leadership matters.

[Asma Khalid]

All right, one more quick break. But, Miles, stick with us because when we get back, we'll have Can't Let.

[NPR Sponsor]

It Go Support for NPR and the following message come from ixlonline. Is your child asking questions on their homework you don't feel equipped to answer? Ixl Learning uses advanced algorithms to give the right help to each kid, no matter the age. Or personality. One subscription gets you everything. One site for all the kids in your home, Pre K to 12th grade. Make an impact on your child's learning. Get IXL now and NPR listeners can get an exclusive 20% off IXL membership when they sign up [e-mail] NPR this message comes from MIDI Health. Women in midlife face a healthcare desert, but MITI is here to fill the gap, offering expert care for perimenopause and menopause covered by insurance. Hot flashes, insomnia, brain fog, weight gain and moodiness don't have to be accepted as just another part of aging. MIDI clinicians understand how these symptoms can connect to menopause and prescribe a wide range of solutions. Book your Visit [e-mail] that's joinmidi.com support for NPR and the following message come from Rosetta Stone, the perfect app to achieve your language learning goals. No matter how busy your schedule gets. It's designed to maximize study time with immersive 10 minute lessons and audio practice for your commute. Plus tailor your learning plan for specific objectives like Travel. Get Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership for 50% off and unlimited access to 25 language courses. Learn more at RosettaStone.com NPR.

[Asma Khalid]

We'Re back and it's now time for the part of the show that I know you all love called Can't Let It Go. That is the where we talk about the things from the week that we just cannot stop talking about, politics or otherwise. And Domenico, why don't you kick it off?

[Miles Parks]

I'm staying Politics because, you know, you all watched here the Carter funeral. I thought it was really heartfelt. But what I can't let go of is the seating arrangements and how you had these presidents, ex presidents and their families all sitting together and the kind of weird, you know, cartoonish interactions that you saw between the presidents and their families. Everything from when Donald Trump and Melania Trump came in, had this really awkward handshake with Mike Pence and Karen Pence.

[Asma Khalid]

Karen Pence, yeah.

[Miles Parks]

Former second lady to stand up, continued to look at her program, didn't shake hands, didn't make eye contact. Then Barack Obama is there. And Barack Obama, it seems like everyone got together and said, he's it. He's the guy who is gonna be the buffer between all of us and Trump. He's gonna have to talk to Trump. They seem to be yucking it up. There are all kinds of memes going around about what it was they were talking about.

[Asma Khalid]

They're yucking it up Domenico. I mean, at some point, you know, you've been in those awkward assigned seating situations. Say you're like, at a wedding and you're seated next to somebody. He can't be rude.

[Miles Parks]

I'm terrible at small talk, but just watching Barack Obama and Donald Trump talk, I was just like, what are they talking about? I mean, there's just so much stuff I do wish.

[Carrie Johnson]

I don't. I. And I didn't monitor the memes super closely, but I did. There's a podcaster, John Boy.

[Miles Parks]

Oh, I love John Boy. He does all the lip reading.

[Carrie Johnson]

I was like. I was thinking. I was like, this would be. I want a John Boy clip of. So that would be awesome.

[Miles Parks]

Oh, you need to pitch. I hope he listens.

[Carrie Johnson]

Yeah, exactly. Someone show this to him. Request.

[Asma Khalid]

Well, Miles, what about you? What can you not let go of?

[Carrie Johnson]

What I cannot let go of is not related to Paul politics at all. But I have a new favorite rapper.

[Miles Parks]

Oh, I can't wait to hear it.

[Carrie Johnson]

I know, exactly. That's kind of. I was like. Sometimes I'm like, public service.

[Miles Parks]

I have an idea who it might be. It's in my head. I want to see if it's the same.

[Carrie Johnson]

So Dochi, that's it.

[Asma Khalid]

Because of his tiny desk.

[Carrie Johnson]

Yes, the tiny desk. I mean, like, a month and a half ago. Full disclosure, they do record these tiny desks a few weeks sometimes in advance of when they actually publish.

[Asma Khalid]

Oh, we're telling you how it happens.

[Carrie Johnson]

Exactly. But they are recorded on our floor where we work. And so occasionally this will happen where you'll kind of be walking, and from across the floor, you'll see a group of people, and you can kind of hear this happen to me. When the Dochi tiny desk was happening is I was on the other side of the floor, and I just kind of, like, heard the beginning of it and could see the energy of the way people were responding to it. And I walked over and I think. I mean, I've now been in NPR 10 years. I think it was the best tiny desk I've ever seen in person. In terms of especially, I had not listened to her. And I'm embarrassed to say that because I try to be up. I had a baby this year, so I'm a little behind on my music, but it was truly a breathtaking performance. And then for me, selfishly, I obviously go down the rabbit hole. I'm grinding her mixtapes. I'm into it. And I read the Wikipedia, and she's from my hometown.

[Miles Parks]

Oh, cool.

[Carrie Johnson]

So she's from Tampa, Florida. And just to find that, I don't know, it was just a very special day for me to be like, I have a new favorite rapper and she's from Tampa. So the listener, go check out the Tiny Dads.

[Miles Parks]

We'll have to see what she thinks about election integrity.

[Carrie Johnson]

Yeah, I don't know. She didn't rap about it, I'll say that much.

[Miles Parks]

Yeah.

[Carrie Johnson]

Wow.

[Miles Parks]

We gotta wait. We gotta wait for a verse. Yeah, exactly.

[Carrie Johnson]

Post 2026, mixed term.

[Asma Khalid]

Maybe she's listening to this mixture. Maybe she's listening.

[Carrie Johnson]

Asma, what can't you let go of?

[Asma Khalid]

All right, so I don't want to bring the mood way, way down, but, you know, I can be a cerebral person, as you all know, sometimes. And I think what has been genuinely hard for me to let go of this week have been the apocalyptic pictures out of the west coast of Southern California. I have been not able to, like, look away from the photos on Instagram because they are so horrific. You see these images of people who've just abandoned their cars. Their whole home's gone. And I just want to give a shout out to, I'm sure the many listeners we have in Southern California, because I cannot imagine being in that situation. It is. Is horror upon horror watching those pictures and videos. And so they have been in my minds a lot this week. And I'm sorry that I'm leaving you all on such a down note, but it's just been something I haven't been able to stop thinking about.

[Miles Parks]

Well, we have a huge listener base in California and we all have friends who live out there and, you know, just checking in with a lot of them to see where they are, if they're safe, if their homes are okay, and if they're okay. Sure. So we're certainly, you know, thinking of everybody there.

[Carrie Johnson]

Well, I do think also, like, to your point, Austin, of, like, literally not being able to let this go, I, you know, I come from a land of hurricanes, and that's Florida's natural disaster of choice or whatever you want to call it. Wildfires, to me, are, in my opinion, the most visceral of. I don't know, I've had. I've had the same response as you. There's something very viscerally unsettling. And so, yeah, I don't. I don't know exactly what that is, but I'm with you.

[Asma Khalid]

All right, well, that is a wrap for Today Shout. Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi. Our editor is Casey Morell. Our producers are Bria Suggs and Kelly Wessinger. Special thanks to Anna Yukonanov. I'm Asma Khalid. I cover the White House.

[Carrie Johnson]

I'm Miles Parks. I cover voting.

[Miles Parks]

And I'm Domenico Montanaro, senior political editor and correspondent.

[Asma Khalid]

And thank you all, as always, for listening to the NPR Politics podcast.

[NPR Sponsor]

This message comes from Spectrum Business, who provides fast, reliable Internet, phone, TV and mobile services to help unlock the unlimited potential of your small business. Learn [e-mail] business support for NPR and the following message come from Bolen Branch Change your sleep with Bolen Branch's airy blankets, cloud like duvets and breathable sheets. Feel the difference with 15% off your first [e-mail] with code NPR exclusions apply. See site for details.

[Sam Bugler]

Support for NPR and the following message come from Washington Wise. Decisions made in Washington can affect your portfolio every day. But what policy changes should investors be watching? Washington Wise is an original podcast for investors from Charles Schwab that unpacks the stories making news in Washington and how it may affect your finances and portfolio. Listen @schwab.com washingtonwise.