Loading summary
Myles Parks
This message comes from Carvana. Carvana makes car selling easy. Enter your license plate or vin, answer some questions, and Carvana will give you a real offer in seconds. Whether you're looking to sell your car right now or whenever feels right. Go to Carvana.com to sell your car the convenient way.
Sarah
Hark, fair listener. My name is Sarah, and Sarah hath named me Amira. And we hail from the fair city of San Jose, California. This eve, we are backstage at Amira's middle school production of Shakespeare's the Tempest. I am cast in the ensemble as a goddess and a spirit. This podcast was recorded at 1:05pm on.
Deepa Shivaram
Wednesday, November 13, 2024.
Sarah
And while the world may have altered greatly by the time you cast your ears upon this here pod, I will still be here listening for my cue to go on stage. Do enjoy the episode. Dear listeners, Prospero hath commanded it.
Myles Parks
Pretty good.
Deepa Shivaram
That was amazing.
Myles Parks
I feel like a couple weeks ago I asked, I was like, more theater timestamps and the people deliver.
Deepa Shivaram
The people deliver. Oh, my gosh, I love that so much. Hey there. It's the NPR Politics podcast. I'm Deepa Shivaram. I cover the White House.
Myles Parks
I'm Myles Parks. I cover voting.
Deepa Shivaram
And Shannon Bond, who covers how information circulates online, is here with us. Hey, Shannon.
Shannon Bond
Hey, guys.
Deepa Shivaram
All right, so today on the show, we're talking about the future of election fraud, lies and conspiracies now that Donald Trump won the 2024 presidential election. And Miles, we're gonna start with you with your reporting here. It's sort of a wind has been taken out of the sails, air is deflating out of the balloon kind of a situation. At least that's what some officials are saying. Is that right?
Myles Parks
Yeah. I've been talking to election officials all week. And, you know, before leading up to the election, I'm from Florida, Deepa. And the feeling I kept getting leading up to the election as I talked to election officials was that feeling when I was a kid when you knew a hurricane was coming right for where you live and you're doing all this preparation, you really don't know what's coming and now. But it's like when the hurricane moves at the last second and hits somewhere else and you've been like, preparing. Your house is like, full of sandbags and all this stuff, and yet it's like sunny outside. It's so quiet. For most election officials out there, I mean, they're still doing the work of counting. They've got weeks of audits still to come. Things like that certification has just begun in many, many localities, and it's going to go up to the state level. But on a whole, election officials are looking around and thinking about how different this looks compared to what they were expecting. I asked Lisa Tolison about this. She's a county clerk in Rock County, Wisconsin. Here's what she said.
Deepa Shivaram
It's completely different. I was, you know, this time four years ago, I was getting nasty phone calls constantly in my office, and we had police protection for a while, and it's been very quiet. One person at my board of canvas, one observer. In 2020, I had 12 to 15. I don't think quiet was what we were expecting at all.
Myles Parks
No, not at all. And honestly, I think the important thing to note here is the actual specifics of how the election was run are just not that different from 2024 to 2020 in terms of election officials did the same thing. People voted and they counted those votes. The difference is the outcome. I mean, that's what election officials across the board are saying. Donald Trump winning just kind of changed the game around a lot of these narratives.
Deepa Shivaram
It's really like people did their jobs four years ago. People did their jobs this month. But, Shannon, I mean, there are still some elements of this that are kind of still being sorted, right?
Shannon Bond
Yeah. I mean, I think we need to remember that there's this election denial movement, really, that Trump has inspired over these past four years, and they've spent that time building up this community, this infrastructure around the idea that there is rampant election fraud and that you need to be looking out for it. And so it was. It was quite striking for them, too. And the idea that, you know, they were sort of building up this idea that there was fraud in the weeks ahead of the election, even through Election Day. And Trump himself, you know, I think at one point posted on Truth Social on Election Day about, you know, fraud happening in Pennsylvania. Then, of course, returns start to come in, and a lot of that talk immediately died down. But we then saw some sort of spins on it happening. Right. So there was this particular narrative twist that was happening among folks who had long been claiming that 2020 was stolen. The idea was that the 2024 results, Trump's victory, actually validated those claims. And one of the things people were seizing on, especially in the first days, right after Election Day, as ballots are still being counted, was the idea that there were these differences in vote totals, and particularly this idea that Kamala Harris did not appear to be getting as many votes as Joe Biden. Had back in 2020. And so this idea that there were these missing Democratic votes, you saw folks seizing and saying, well, look, we were right. Like, 2020 was stolen because how could so many fewer Democrats be voting now? Of course, we all know it takes a long time to count ballots. I live in California where election officials are still counting ballots. And so what you've seen is in the past week, you know, obviously the number, the total votes for Kamala Harris has actually increased. But there is still this sort of persistent narratives, as well as some narratives around certain Senate races, like Carrie Lake in Arizona, where you're still seeing people kind of grab onto this idea that maybe this just justifies the idea that there was fraud back in 2020, or maybe there was still some problems in 2024.
Myles Parks
The new reality, right, Shannon, is that there is going to be garbage online no matter what is happening. And I think it feels like, to me that the difference is whether there's kind of real world impact from all that garbage happening online. And, like, we are still seeing a lot of the claims being made, but that it doesn't seem to be rising to people actually acting on it in the same way as 2020.
Deepa Shivaram
I'm curious from both of your perspectives as folks who covered this so intensely just the last several months, but like, four years plus now of tracking all of this stuff, are you shocked by how this played out in the immediate aftermath of this election?
Myles Parks
I'm not. I mean, honestly, I think when you actually look at the incentive structures of election denial, the idea of trying to undermine the legitimacy of elections, if you win an election, you are not incentivized in the same way to lie about those results than if you lose the election. And so I think at the simplest way, I guess it just kind of makes sense a little bit to me. What about you, Shannon?
Shannon Bond
Yeah, I mean, I did wonder sort of what was going to happen if it became very clear, you know, relatively quickly as it did, that Trump won. And I do think we've also seen a little bit of people, you know, in this election, quote, unquote, election integrity movement, you try to claim that, you know, the reason that there wasn't a steal, there wasn't a rig this year was because of the work they have done over the past four years. Another thing I think that's sort of been not surprising to me is that the fact that we do still have people seizing on some of this. I mean, our election system is complicated, and it is different from state to state, and there's all sorts of different rules and the counting process is still confusing to people. And so all of that stuff, you know, does sort of create the breeding ground. So it's not surprising to me we're still seeing some of this. But I think the thing that, you know, that Miles really captured this idea that it's not translating into actual action. I think a huge part of that is that, you know, you don't have that message from the top. Right. Like, Donald Trump is accepting, obviously accepting his victory. And so that's not setting the tone for people to really act on these theories that they have.
Myles Parks
But I do think, like, there's this open question that I'm really interested in and how this changes his views about the 2020 election. I doubt it's going to be some sort of press conference on January 21st where he says, actually, you know, I've changed my mind about a lot of stuff. But as I've been talking to Republicans over the last few days, I think I've gotten a lot of conflicting answers on the expectation on whether Trump is going to find a way to stop talking about 2020 as much as he did previously, because it does kind of take away from the fact that he is going to win the popular vote here in 2024. One would assume that is going to be what he focuses on, but it's really hard to predict Trump. Right. So I'm really curious to see how the narrative around 2020 comes from the top.
Deepa Shivaram
Yeah. And to be clear, like, we should point out that Donald Trump still never admitted that he didn't win in 2020. So, you know, keep that in mind through all of this. All right. We're going to take a quick break, and we'll have more in a moment.
Ira Glass
This message comes from NPR sponsor Saatva. This year, many Americans will make a decision that will affect them for years to come. The decision which mattress to choose? Saatva luxury mattresses are meticulously handcrafted to lull you to sleep and to keep you sleeping soundly. And they cost a fraction of the price of retail. Visit saatva.com NPR to save $200 on orders of $1,000 or more. This message comes from BetterHelp. It's important to take time to show gratitude towards others, but it's equally important to thank yourself. Life throws a lot of curveballs, and being grateful isn't always easy. Therapy can help remind you of all that you're worthy of and all that you do have. Let the gratitude flow with BetterHelp. Try@betterhelp.com NPR today to get 10% off your first month support for NPR. And the following message come from SimpliSafe. If you're ever worried about the safety of your home and family, there's no better time to act. Get 60% off a new SimpliSafe security system today. Old school alarm systems only kick in once someone is already inside your home. SimpliSafe stops criminals from entering your home with its exclusive active Guard outdoor protection. To get 60% off any new system with a select professional monitoring plan, head to simplisafe.com NPR Politics. There's no safe like SimpliSafe.
Deepa Shivaram
And we're back. And you know, there are still ballots being counted. There were some conversations, potential concerns about the process being held up, but it doesn't appear that that is happening.
Myles Parks
No, we're seeing across the board, certification has begun in a lot of localities. Georgia, for instance, just certified at the local level across the state. And there were a lot of concerns leading up to election that people who were emboldened by Trump would potentially, we saw this in earlier election cycles would decline to certify or would vote to decline to certify. And we did not see that anywhere in Georgia yesterday. Certification has gone smoothly there and it's gone smoothly across the country. We have not seen any of these fears around certification bubble up. And most experts think that's because Trump won.
Deepa Shivaram
There is some election conspiracies on the left that are floating around. But the big difference, Shannon, is that there's no one with political power amplifying them. The scale on how much this has spread, how many people are maybe spreading this information, it's just astronomically different.
Shannon Bond
Yeah, that's right. I mean, we're seeing some of these same dynamics around counting. Right. And the idea that there are differences in vote totals and differences in turnout being used by some folks on the left to say, hey, you know, there's something fishy going on here. Where did these votes go? You know, maybe Trump cheated, which again, like, there's no indication that happened. All election officials and the intelligence community and cybersecurity officials have said this has been a very secure election. But we are seeing some of that happening. But you're right, it's not taking off in the same way. There have been some individual posts on platforms like X or Meta's threads or Bluesky that are in some cases have gotten millions of views, but we're not seeing the broader network effect happening. And there's a couple reasons for this. First of all, there's this sort of idea that researchers talk about of evidence generation infrastructure. I know that sounds like a mouthful, but the idea is that on the right, you've had this whole sort of community of folks who spend their time digging through to find evidence that there is something wrong with elections, that there is issues with counting. You've seen the videos go viral or the pictures people are taking saying, hey, is someone pulling a box of ballots out and unfairly putting them in? Or problems with voting machines? There just is not that same kind of content being produced on the left. There's also on the left, there's just not the same kind of network of these high profile influencers and partisan media outlets who are then willing to take these claims and amplify them and that we've seen so developed over the past four years. You know, when I spoke to researchers at the University of Washington who have been studying election fraud, the way they put it is there's just no left wing equivalent of the 2020 Stop the Steal mobilization effort.
Myles Parks
And that's the thing. I mean, 2020, that was what was so extraordinary about, was Trump's actions, not the idea that there's a portion of the population who denies election results. That has always existed in a small faction in American elections. If you have elections, there's going to be some portion of the population that has an issue with how they were run. I mean, we did see this a lot in 2004, in the 2004 presidential election. There were a lot of conspiracy theories that year about voting machines in Ohio, for instance. But you didn't see John Kerry coming out and saying that and saying, I will not concede to George W. Bush. What one expert said to me one time was that, you know, 10 or 15% of the population will always believe conspiracy theories. It's just a question of whether you have political elites parroting those things. And that's how you get to the place where we are right now where more than a third of Americans question the election integrity.
Deepa Shivaram
Well, yeah, Shannon, to your point in their story that you had that came out this week on NPR was folks who were spreading that hashtag of asking Kamala Harris not to concede. I definitely woke up on Wednesday morning and saw that in a flood of my feed on X of people being like, my ballot was never counted. How come Democrats aren't talking about this, this? And then, you know, literally hours later, she conceded the race. And in your reporting, I mean, those hashtags, even the number of hashtags that were being tweeted out Declined.
Shannon Bond
That's right. That's right. And that just shows you, like, how important it is. And that tone is set from the top. And the role really ultimately that Trump played in the 2020 Stop the Steal movement, that is like the major, major difference here. And, you know, I think that's probably encouraging, right, in terms of we're thinking about, like, you know, how do we deal with the fact, as Miles says, like, there's always going to be some portion of the electorate that is distrustful of things or that might be spreading rumors and conspiracy theories. You know, I think it's, you know, it's important to know it really does make a difference. The people with the biggest megaphones, you know, what they are saying, what they are deciding to encourage.
Deepa Shivaram
That being said, though, I mean, one in three Americans being distrustful of the process, like, even though it's like a maybe amplified at the top, you know, sort of a situation, it still affects so many people both on the left and on the right.
Shannon Bond
Yeah. And as we talked about, this idea that you've had Trump set that tone and then you have had this entire sort of cottage industry pop up, right, of people who are more or less like professional election deniers. You have folks who go out and do, like, events across the country, you know, drawing people to come and hear them speak. You have folks like Dinesh D'Souza, the right wing commentator who was one of the people, you know, making these initial claims last week about the idea that there were these supposed missing votes proved that 20 was stolen. He made a documentary about alleged ballot mules in 2020, sort of claiming to prove fraud back then. He has written books. There are people who do kind of make money off of this, have figured out ways to monetize election denial. And I don't think the idea that Trump won in 2024 is going to stop some of these folks from continuing to try to monetize that message.
Myles Parks
But I will say I do think that there's a portion of that population that is kind of distrustful right now in elections that election officials see at least anecdotally in the last week. They do see the quiet right now as a huge portion of it is because Trump won. But I think they're also saying, we've been working on this for four years trying to educate people. And I think when you look at how people feel about the election system, so much of it goes back to what the candidates say. Think about, you know, early voting is a good example. 2020 Republicans were very distrustful and wanted to vote on Election Day. This time around, Donald Trump and other Republican candidates say, no, go vote early. And you saw Republicans do that. And so I think a portion of that distrust is malleable at this point. I think it's a question of how much is actually baked in versus if this idea of election denial just became a little bit less mainstream or even less talked about. I think it's unclear at this point how much of that population would still keep believing these things.
Deepa Shivaram
All right. Shannon Ban, thanks so much for joining us.
Shannon Bond
Thanks for having me.
Deepa Shivaram
Let's leave it there for today. I'm Deepa Shivaram. I cover the White House.
Myles Parks
I'm Myles Parks. I cover voting.
Deepa Shivaram
And thank you for listening to the NPR Politics Podcast.
Sarah
Okay, so does this sound like you you love NPR's podcasts. You wish you could get more of all your favorite shows, and you want to support NPR's mission to create a more inform public. If all that sounds appealing, then it is time to sign up for the NPR Bundle. Learn more at plus.NPR.org this is Ira.
Unknown
Glass of this American Life. Each week on our show, we choose a theme, tell different stories on that theme. All right, I'm just going to stop right there. You're listening to an NPR podcast. Chances are you know our show. So instead, I'm going to tell you we've just been on a run of really good shows lately, some big, epic, emotional stories and some weird, funny stuff, too. Download us this American Life.
Ira Glass
Listen to this podcast sponsor free on Amazon Music with a Prime membership or any podcast app by subscribing to NPR Politics+@plus.NPR.org that's plus.NPR.org.
The NPR Politics Podcast
Episode Title: Trump Won. What Happens to His Election Fraud Movement?
Host: Deepa Shivaram
Co-Hosts: Myles Parks, Shannon Bond
Air Date: November 13, 2024
In this episode of The NPR Politics Podcast, hosts Deepa Shivaram, Myles Parks, and Shannon Bond delve into the aftermath of Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 presidential election. They explore the implications for the election fraud movement that Trump has championed and assess the current landscape of election integrity narratives in the United States.
Myles Parks begins the discussion by providing insights from various election officials across the country. He paints a picture of unexpected calm following the election, contrasting it with the tense atmosphere leading up to 2020.
"It's like when the hurricane moves at the last second and hits somewhere else... yet it's like sunny outside. It's so quiet." (02:25)
Deepa Shivaram shares her conversation with Lisa Tolison, a county clerk in Rock County, Wisconsin, highlighting the significant reduction in hostile reactions compared to previous elections.
"In 2020, I had 12 to 15... It hasn't been quiet." (02:25)
Myles Parks emphasizes that the election process this year was fundamentally similar to 2020 in terms of administration and vote counting. The primary difference lies in the outcome, with Trump's victory altering the narrative landscape.
"The difference is the outcome. That's what election officials across the board are saying." (03:05)
Shannon Bond discusses the enduring impact of Trump's influence on the election denial movement. She explains how Trump and his allies have built a robust infrastructure over the past four years to propagate claims of election fraud.
"They have gathered this community, this infrastructure around the idea that there is rampant election fraud and that you need to be looking out for it." (03:14)
Myles Parks reflects on the resilience of misinformation online, noting that while false claims persist, their real-world impact appears diminished compared to previous elections.
"The difference is whether there's kind of real world impact from all that garbage happening online." (05:07)
Deepa Shivaram highlights ongoing ballot counts and the smooth certification process in key states like Georgia, countering fears of widespread refusal to certify results.
"Certification has gone smoothly there and it's gone smoothly across the country." (09:39)
Shannon Bond contrasts the current scenario with the 2020 election by pointing out the absence of left-wing parallels in spreading election fraud claims. She notes the lack of a coordinated movement on the left to challenge election integrity.
"There is just no left wing equivalent of the 2020 Stop the Steal mobilization effort." (12:15)
Myles Parks draws comparisons between the 2020 and 2024 elections, emphasizing that election denial has historically existed but was significantly amplified by Trump's actions in 2020.
"10 or 15% of the population will always believe conspiracy theories. It's just a question of whether you have political elites parroting those things." (12:15)
Shannon Bond discusses how the absence of major political figures endorsing election fraud theories in 2024 has led to a diminished spread of such narratives.
"The tone is set from the top... Donald Trump is accepting, obviously accepting his victory." (07:52)
Myles Parks speculates on Trump's potential future narratives, questioning whether he will continue to emphasize the 2020 election fraud claims or pivot to other topics.
"I'm curious to see how the narrative around 2020 comes from the top." (07:52)
Shannon Bond warns that despite the current decline, individuals and groups vested in the election denial movement may continue to monetize and propagate these claims irrespective of Trump's stance.
"People who spread these theories have figured out ways to monetize election denial." (15:12)
Deepa Shivaram underscores the broader implications of diminished trust in the electoral process, noting that approximately one-third of Americans harbor doubts about election integrity.
"One in three Americans being distrustful of the process... it still affects so many people both on the left and on the right." (14:06)
Shannon Bond emphasizes the importance of leadership in shaping public perception and trust in electoral systems.
"The people with the biggest megaphones, you know, what they are saying, what they are deciding to encourage." (14:18)
The episode concludes with the hosts reflecting on the current state of election fraud narratives post-Trump’s 2024 victory. While the immediate aftermath shows a decrease in disruptive election denial activities, the underlying distrust among a significant portion of the population remains a pressing concern. The sustainability of these narratives largely depends on future political discourse and efforts to rebuild trust in electoral institutions.
Deepa Shivaram wraps up the discussion, thanking listeners and encouraging continued engagement with NPR's coverage of political developments.
Myles Parks: "It's like when the hurricane moves at the last second and hits somewhere else... yet it's like sunny outside. It's so quiet outside." (02:25)
Myles Parks: "The difference is the outcome. That's what election officials across the board are saying." (03:05)
Shannon Bond: "They have gathered this community, this infrastructure around the idea that there is rampant election fraud and that you need to be looking out for it." (03:14)
Myles Parks: "The difference is whether there's kind of real world impact from all that garbage happening online." (05:07)
Shannon Bond: "There is just no left wing equivalent of the 2020 Stop the Steal mobilization effort." (12:15)
Myles Parks: "10 or 15% of the population will always believe conspiracy theories. It's just a question of whether you have political elites parroting those things." (12:15)
Shannon Bond: "The people with the biggest megaphones, you know, what they are saying, what they are deciding to encourage." (14:18)
Election Process Stability: Despite fears of certification refusals akin to those in 2020, the 2024 election saw smooth certification across major states, particularly following Trump's win.
Diminished Amplification of Fraud Claims: The absence of key political figures endorsing election fraud theories in 2024 has led to a reduction in the spread and impact of such narratives.
Enduring Public Distrust: A significant portion of the American populace remains distrustful of the electoral process, a legacy of years of election denial efforts.
Potential Persistency of Conspiracy Theories: Even with reduced mainstream amplification, individual actors and groups dedicated to election denial may continue to propagate these claims independently.
For those seeking to understand the complexities of election integrity and the socio-political dynamics post-Trump’s 2024 victory, this episode offers a comprehensive analysis backed by insights from election officials and media experts. It serves as a crucial resource for navigating the evolving landscape of American politics and the enduring challenges to public trust in democratic institutions.
This summary encapsulates the key discussions and insights from the episode "Trump Won. What Happens to His Election Fraud Movement?" on The NPR Politics Podcast. For a deeper dive, listening to the full episode is recommended.