Tucker Carlson Interview Ignites Debate Over Antisemitism Among Conservatives

Summary

---

The NPR Politics Podcast

Episode: Tucker Carlson Interview Ignites Debate Over Antisemitism Among Conservatives
Date: November 11, 2025
Hosts: Miles Parks, Sarah McCammon, Domenico Montanaro

---

Overview

This episode examines the controversy ignited by Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with far-right influencer Nick Fuentes, which has forced the conservative movement to publicly grapple with antisemitism and boundary-setting regarding extreme rhetoric. With reactions spanning from condemnation by Republican leaders to defenses rooted in “anti-cancel culture” sentiment, the episode analyzes what this moment reveals about the state of the American right, the challenges posed by online influencers, and the ever-shifting lines of acceptability in political discourse.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. Who is Nick Fuentes, and Why is the Interview Controversial?

(01:08–02:52)

• Nick Fuentes’ Background:
  • A 27-year-old far-right influencer, known for racist and antisemitic views, Holocaust denial, and derogatory remarks about women.
  • Rose to prominence after attending the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville.
  • Built a substantial online following among young men called “groypers.”
• Carlson’s Platforming:
  • Sarah McCammon notes the interview’s tone was “friendly” and Carlson did not substantially challenge Fuentes' extremist views, especially on antisemitism and conspiracy theories about “Jewish loyalty.”
  • "Carlson started by telling Fuentes, you know, look, I've heard about you. I wanted to meet you. I wanted to hear what you really think." (02:16, Sarah McCammon)

2. Blowback from Conservative Leaders

(02:53–03:42)

• Immediate Responses:
  • Prominent Republicans, like Senator Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham, condemned Fuentes’ rhetoric and insisted there is “no place for antisemitism in the conservative movement or the Republican party.” (03:20, Sarah McCammon)
  • The controversy came just before the Republican Jewish Coalition's meeting, where pushback against antisemitism was a leading theme.

3. The Heritage Foundation’s Role and Identity Crisis

(03:42–06:41)

• Institutional Defense:

  • Kevin Roberts, head of Heritage, defended Carlson and cast criticism as “cancel culture.”
  • This led to a heated staff meeting where figures like Robert Rector questioned where the boundary for acceptable association lies.

• Internal Debate:

  • Members pointed to past instances of the right disavowing or “cancelling” extremists, such as David Duke and the John Birch Society:
    • “Did we cancel David Duke? Yes.” (05:03, Domenico Montanaro)
    • “Did we cancel the John Birch Society? Yes.” (05:15, Miles Parks)
  • Sarah McCammon summarizes, "He and others stood up during this staff meeting, essentially asked Roberts, where's the boundary here? Where is the line for the conservative movement?" (05:23)

• Heritage’s Influence on the Trump Era:

  • The think tank, instrumental in Project 2025 and the second Trump term, has seen its identity shift from research-driven to more ideological, exacerbating internal tensions.
  • "There's a struggle for the soul of the Heritage Foundation." (06:10, Domenico Montanaro)

4. Shifting Guardrails, Speech, and Political Correctness

(06:41–07:56)

• Evolving Standards:
  • Domenico Montanaro observes that what’s considered unacceptable speech has changed markedly in the Trump era, with fewer “guardrails” on what’s permissible, especially as the right campaigns against “political correctness.”
  • “We haven’t reestablished guardrails for what is appropriate and what’s not.” (07:17, Domenico Montanaro)

5. Antisemitism Across the Political Spectrum

(11:27–13:15)

• Right vs. Left:
  • The right has seen white nationalist and supremacist groups try to enter the mainstream, especially online.
  • On the left, particularly amid the Gaza conflict, some younger progressives’ rhetoric is seen as crossing into antisemitism, often through conflating Jewish identity and Israeli policy.
• Expert Viewpoint:
  • Amy Spatolnik (Jewish Council for Public Affairs) expresses concern about rising antisemitism on both sides but welcomes the right calling out bad actors in their midst.

6. Media Incentives and the Role of Online Influence

(13:15–14:53)

• Mark Goldfedder (National Jewish Advocacy Center) attributes Carlson’s interview to “market incentives” in online media, emphasizing that sensational or extreme content draws clicks:
  • “There’s an incentive towards sensationalization... Tucker has to get more and more extreme each week if he wants to keep those clicks coming.” (14:26–14:33, Sarah McCammon)
• Antisemitism as Online Fuel:
  • "Antisemitism is very cheap and easy and always available... easily malleable for those who choose to exploit it, especially in an online environment." (14:38, Sarah McCammon)

7. The Conservative Dilemma: Free Speech vs. Boundary-Setting

(15:30–16:47)

• Anti-Cancel Culture Paradox:
  • The right’s stand against “cancel culture” complicates efforts to set boundaries for acceptable speech.
  • “In an environment where we're not canceling people, being open to any kind of conversation is a point of pride. It makes it harder to draw those lines.” (15:55, Sarah McCammon)
• Traditional vs. New Right:
  • The tension is most evident between traditional conservatives and the newer, online far-right that thrives in Trump-era politics.

8. Electoral Implications and the Limits of Outrage

(17:19–19:07)

• Median Voter Impact:
  • While media and politicians may be embroiled in defining boundaries, it’s not clear these debates motivate typical voters—bread-and-butter issues remain top priorities.
  • “There are a lot of things that matter to people. But not everything is motivating for people to go to the polls.” (17:42, Domenico Montanaro)
• Trump’s Base:
  • Sarah McCammon notes Trump’s supporters are often willing to overlook—or recontextualize—his inflammatory remarks, raising the question whether others like Carlson or Roberts can do the same.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On the friendly nature of the interview:

  • "A lot of people have remarked in what a kind of friendly tone this conversation took on... he largely stayed away from some of [Fuentes’] most extreme and controversial past statements." (02:14, Sarah McCammon)

• On setting boundaries:

  • “Did we cancel David Duke? Yes... Did we cancel the John Birch Society? Yes... Because if they're in your movement, you look like clowns.” (05:03–05:18, Domenico Montanaro & Sarah McCammon)

• On the state of free speech and cancel culture:

  • “There's a difference between cancel culture and having a sort of sense of who we are and who our values are.” (15:55, Sarah McCammon)
  • “A lot of what's coming from the right... is not really a principled line. It's about politics and about making sure their point of view is heard.” (16:47, Domenico Montanaro)

• On antisemitism as content:

  • “Antisemitism is very cheap and easy and always available. Possibly the oldest bigotry that there is... easily malleable for those who choose to exploit it, especially in an online environment.” (14:38, Sarah McCammon)

---

Important Timestamps

• 01:08 – Introduction of the Tucker Carlson/Nick Fuentes interview
• 02:05 – Fuentes’ history and audience
• 02:52 – Discussion of antisemitism in the interview
• 03:20 – Republicans condemn the rhetoric
• 03:56 – Heritage Foundation defends Carlson, internal debates
• 05:00–05:18 – Historical perspective on “cancelling” extremists
• 06:41 – Heritage’s ongoing transformation
• 07:17 – Changing guardrails in political discourse
• 11:27 – Antisemitism dynamics on left and right
• 14:25–14:38 – Social media incentives driving extremist content
• 15:55 – Free speech vs. movement boundaries debate
• 17:42 – Impact (or lack thereof) on moderate/median voters
• 18:20 – Trump’s unique relationship with his supporters and boundaries

---

Conclusion

The episode underscores how Carlson’s interview with Fuentes has forced the Republican Party and affiliated institutions to publicly negotiate the tension between open discourse, the demands of their online base, and the need to draw moral or political red lines. With divisions exposed not only among elected officials but also influential think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, the debate offers a snapshot of a movement—and a political culture—struggling to define its boundaries in the digital age.

---

Transcript

[Sarah McCammon]

This message comes from Mint mobile. Starting at $15 a month. Make the [e-mail] Switch $45 upfront payment for three months. 5 gigabyte plan equivalent to $15 a month. Taxes and fees. Extra first three months only. See terms. This is Hallie calling from Atlanta, Georgia. I'm about to watch my childhood best friend defend her PhD dissertation in neuroscience. Caitlin, I'm really, really proud of you and I think I understand your research.

[Miles Parks]

Good luck. This podcast was recorded at 12:37pm on Tuesday, November 11, 2025.

[Sarah McCammon]

Things may have changed by the time you hear this, but we will have a new doctor in the house. Nice. Congrats, Caitlin. Very impressive.

[Miles Parks]

Very, very impressive. That's the thing you definitely, like, succeed at, right? Like we're not. We didn't air that. And then she, like, did not.

[Sarah McCammon]

I'm sure. I'm sure she did.

[Miles Parks]

She did it right.

[Sarah McCammon]

I'm sure she.

[Miles Parks]

We believe in her.

[Sarah McCammon]

She's a neuroscientist.

[Miles Parks]

Yeah. Hey there. It's the NPR Politics podcast. I'm Miles Parks. I cover voting.

[Sarah McCammon]

I'm Sarah McCammon. I cover politics.

[Domenico Montanaro]

And I'm Domenico Montanaro, senior political editor and correspondent.

[Miles Parks]

And today on the show, how a Tucker Carlson podcast episode is forcing the entire conservative movement to confront some difficult questions about who belongs in the tent. Sarah, this episode, which I should Note has roughly 6 million views already on YouTube, is between Carlson and this far right influencer named Nick Fuentes. Let's just start there. Who is Fuentes?

[Sarah McCammon]

Yeah, well, anybody who's been sort of paying attention to right wing media has likely heard his name before. He's been around for a while. He's only 27, but he first got on a lot of people's radar back in 2017 after the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, which he attended. You know, he's known for holding a host of extreme views, racist and anti Semitic views, including Holocaust denial. He's used violent and degrading rhetoric about women. And, you know, he has built an online following of largely young men who call themselves gripers.

[Miles Parks]

Got it. So how much of those kind of controversial views that you just talked about came up in this interview with Carlson?

[Sarah McCammon]

Well, you know, I should say that the two of them talked for more than two hours. A lot of people have remarked in what a kind of friendly tone this conversation took on. Carlson started by telling Fuentes, you know, look, I've heard about you. I wanted to meet you. I wanted to hear what you really think. And critics on the right and the left have pointed out that he didn't challenge Fuentes very much. He largely stayed away from some of his most extreme and controversial past statements. They did talk about some of his views of Israel and of Jewish people. And, you know, Fuentes sort of invoked this long standing anti Semitic trope, this idea that Jewish loyalty to each other and to the state of Israel was somehow standing in the way of national unity.

[Domenico Montanaro]

I would say, though, that the main.

[Miles Parks]

Challenge to that, a big challenge to.

[Domenico Montanaro]

That, is organized Jewry in America.

[Sarah McCammon]

And then he listed off a handful of influential Jewish Americans who he suggested were not capable of fostering that kind of unity he said was so important.

[Domenico Montanaro]

I see Jewishness as the common denominator.

[Miles Parks]

And you're right, it's not.

[Domenico Montanaro]

Not all Jewish people feel the same way. No one would say that. But that does seem to be the common denominator. And I just feel like it needs to be called out explicitly.

[Sarah McCammon]

So, Miles, that led to some blowback almost immediately. People like Texas Senator Ted Cruz and others have called out this rhetoric and said there's no place for antisemitism in the conservative movement or the Republican party. This aired October 27th, just a couple of days before the Republican Jewish Coalition met in Las Vegas. And, you know, pushing back against antisemitism was. Was a big theme there.

[Miles Parks]

And I feel like the blowback is where the story does get really interesting. We start seeing a lot of different Republicans and conservative people kind of engaging with how they want to think about some of these ideas. How has this played out at the Heritage Foundation? Because I know you've reported a lot on that as well.

[Sarah McCammon]

Yeah. So at the same time that prominent Republicans like Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham, senator from South Carolina, were making these statements sort of pushing back, Kevin Roberts, who leads the Heritage foundation, made a statement essentially defending Tucker Carlson and pushing back against what he sort of characterized as manifestation of cancel culture. Kevin Roberts leads the Heritage Foundation. The Heritage foundation is this long standing, influential sort of conservative institution in Washington. As you know, they were probably best known in recent years for being involved in Project 2025, that huge document that outlined a host of conservative objectives and policy goals, many of which have been implemented under the second Trump administration. So again, Kevin Roberts defended Carlson and pushed back against the pushback, in essence. And that led to a contentious staff meeting at Heritage last week in which Robert Rector, who's a longtime research fellow there, said that the conservative movement should learn from the mistakes of the past and learn from times in the past when they've pushed out Some of the.

[Miles Parks]

Most extreme voices, you say, oh, we don't cancel.

[Domenico Montanaro]

We do cancel. Did we cancel David Duke? Yes.

[Sarah McCammon]

You don't even know who David Duke was.

[Domenico Montanaro]

Probably most of you, I'd say, yes.

[Miles Parks]

Did we cancel the John Birch Society?

[Domenico Montanaro]

Yes.

[Miles Parks]

Okay. Because they were harmful.

[Sarah McCammon]

Because if they're in your movement, you look like clowns.

[Miles Parks]

Okay.

[Sarah McCammon]

He and others stood up during this staff meeting, essentially asked Roberts, where's the boundary here? Where is the line for the conservative movement? And here's how Roberts responded.

[Miles Parks]

That evil person, Fuentes, although I still.

[Domenico Montanaro]

Have hope for his soul, has an.

[Miles Parks]

Audience of several million people. And at least some of that audience.

[Domenico Montanaro]

Might be open to be converted. You know, the Heritage foundation, as Sarah mentioned, is a group that was instrumental in the creation of Project 2025. There are a lot of people who have flowed into this second Trump term, really kind of been the core engine of what the second Trump term is about and what it's doing. And the Heritage foundation has gone through a long roiling of what its identity is. You know, it's a conservative think tank. It had been long respected on the right, but turned into something very different when former South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint took over the group in 2012. He was more ideological than research driven. There was a struggle for the soul of the Heritage foundation, really, during his four years there, and that's really the inception of this. Since the Tea Party movement and kind of move the Republican Party into something more ideological than it had been before. It's really struggled to figure out what it is.

[Miles Parks]

I mean, Domenico, are you surprised at all that this podcast has generated such division among conservatives?

[Domenico Montanaro]

Well, everyone has a line. It's interesting because in a lot of ways, this is emblematic of the entire Trump era here that we've seen over the last 10 years, where the guardrails on what's appropriate to say in polite society and have really been moved. I mean, you know, Trump ran on ending, quote, political correctness. Conservatives ran with that and later went after people for being, quote, woke in the last, you know, few years. But there's a reason things become politically correct. It's because they're the correct thing to say or what's acceptable in society. That's not only changed substantially, we haven't reestablished guardrails for what is appropriate and what's not. Where are those lines? You know, clearly here, for the right, it's antisemitism, but there's a lot of it on the right as part of their coalition, whether they want to recognize it or not, you know, I mean, on the left. As the war in Gaza has dragged on, you've seen it some on the left as well. So neither party is really immune to this, but we're really still in this era of volatility, of speech, of trying to figure out what is okay to say and what's not. And for a long time, these kinds of things would never have been able to see the light of day in any kind of mainstream place.

[Sarah McCammon]

And I think one thing that's really notable here because, you know, Domenico is right, everybody has a line and these concerns around antisemitism. I mean, first of all, we're seeing a larger pattern where there is, you know, a concerning pattern of increasing anti Semitic incidents, violence, rhetoric across the political spectrum. Everyone I talked to for this story pretty much agreed on that. And, you know, there are a number of influential figures on the right, people like Nick Fuentes, or think of the conservative influencer and podcaster Candace Owens, who's also built a huge following online, who have become particularly pointed in their antisemitic rhetoric. I think what happened here is this wasn't just Internet influencers talking. This was the Heritage foundation, which again is an institution in D.C. and for the head of the Heritage foundation to step in and defend, you know, what a lot of people called the platforming of these ideas was sort of a breaking point for, you know, some people on the right in general. And even at Heritage, there have been a handful of resignations. And in the wake of all of this, a task force that Heritage had established to fight antisemitism lost several members first, and then the task force disaffiliated from Heritage altogether.

[Miles Parks]

It was so interesting just hearing that quote of Roberts essentially saying, this guy has an audience and, you know, that means something. I feel like the idea of trying to grapple with these Internet influencers who are building their audiences versus these institutions that say they have values. I feel like this is not going to be the last time that these two things bump into each other.

[Domenico Montanaro]

I think these kinds of little fires are going to pop up here and there because you really had the fringe move into the mainstream on the right, and they've really struggled to figure out what the appropriate message is.

[Miles Parks]

All right, we're going to take a quick break and more in just a moment. Hey, it's Ray from Car Talk. Are you tired of all the depth.

[Domenico Montanaro]

And thoughtful care that goes into NPR shows? Want some good old fashioned goofing around and stumbling to figure out what's going on? Well, I've been taking occasional car questions.

[Miles Parks]

Again.

[Domenico Montanaro]

You can hear them by signing up for NPR plus, along with lots of other bonus content.

[Miles Parks]

Just go to plus.npr.org this message comes from Instacart. It's Sunday, 5pm you had a non stop weekend. You're running on empty and so is your fridge. You're in the trenches of the Sunday scaries. You don't have it in you to go to the store, but this is your reminder. You don't have to. You can get everything you need delivered through Instacart so that you can get what you really need, more time to do whatever you want. Instacart for one less Sunday. Scary. This message is sponsored by dsw, the birthplace of the humble brag, full of all kinds of shoes that get you at prices that get your budget. And when there are never ending options for every style, mood, occasion and budget, there is unlimited freedom to play. And that's something to brag about. So go ahead, stock up on fresh sneakers from your favorite brands or try those boots you always secretly knew you could pull off. Find the shoes that get you at prices that get your budget. Dsw. Let them surprise you. And we're back and we've been talking about the fallout from Tucker Carlson's interview with Nick Fuentes and how the conservative movement is addressing issues of anti Semitism in its ranks. Domenico, we should note here that this is not just on the right. You know, the progressive movement and the left have also struggled with this issue of anti Semitism. And is this different? I guess. Is it different between the two political sides?

[Domenico Montanaro]

Yeah, I think that there's some gradients of nuance here that's a little different. I mean, what we've seen on the right has really been groups of people who kind of have this as a foundational piece of what they believe. White supremacist groups, white nationalist groups that glommed onto the Trump movement in 2015, 2016. And it really was an online phenomenon in a lot of respects where you saw a lot of harassment of people who were Jewish online Jewish reporters. So this goes back quite a ways with white nationalists kind of moving into or trying to move into the mainstream, using the Republican Party and the Trump movement to do so. I think what we've seen on the left has really kind of come up because of the war in Gaza. You've seen a lot more people kind of talk out from the left, from younger progressives in saying that they feel like the war in Gaza shouldn't be taking place and standing up for Palestinians. And sometimes that rhetoric has crossed into areas that people like the Anti Defamation League would consider anti Semitic, you know, and that's been called out. And I think that's been a struggle on the left and continues right now with that.

[Sarah McCammon]

Yeah. In my reporting for this story, I spoke with Amy Spatolnik, who's with the Jewish Council for Public Affairs. Now, that's a nonpartisan group, but a group that tends to lean progressive. And she said she is concerned about what she's seeing on both the right and the left, including a tendency to conflate Jews and in Jewish communities with Israel or the Israeli government. But, you know, in the bigger picture, she said this is something that she hopes that people across the political spectrum will be aware of and call out where they see it. So she said, you know, she was pleased to see people on the right calling this out within their own ranks.

[Miles Parks]

Well, it's interesting. I feel like, you know, Fuentes is obviously not the only influencer on the right who kind of traffics in ideas that many people would consider offensive, racist, anti Semitic, whatever word you want to use there. Where is the line right now, Sarah, in terms of what the conservative movement seems to deem acceptable versus not?

[Sarah McCammon]

I mean, that is the question, as we've said, and I think it's still being worked out. I mentioned earlier, you know, people like Candace Owens, her rhetoric has become increasingly, I think many people would agree, anti Semitic, anti Jewish. So it's not only people like Nick Fuentes that are generating this concern. And, you know, Tucker Carlson's decision to spend this time with him, to have this long, friendly conversation, you know, I think it needs to be understood in the context of the Internet and the sort of online media ecosystem in which we all exist. I talked with Mark Goldfedder. He's with the National Jewish Advocacy center, and he was a member of the task force at Heritage to fight antisemitism. He stepped away from that, as many others did, as I mentioned. But Goldfetter said that he thinks Tucker Carlson's decision to do this, to spend this time with Fuentes, is really about the way that online media works.

[Domenico Montanaro]

You know, there's a market value here.

[Sarah McCammon]

There's an incentive towards sensationalization.

[Miles Parks]

So, you know, of course, Tucker has.

[Domenico Montanaro]

To get more and more extreme each.

[Sarah McCammon]

Week if he wants to keep those clicks coming.

[Domenico Montanaro]

And I think, unfortunately, it's a perfect.

[Sarah McCammon]

Storm, because antisemitism is very cheap and easy and always available. Possibly the oldest bigotry that there is, people have said, and easily malleable for Those who choose to exploit it, especially in an online environment, I think the.

[Domenico Montanaro]

Line is hard to see, exactly. I think it depends on the platform and who pushes back how much of a platform either one of those has. You know, and I think that this has changed some from the right because of them trying to tag the left as anti Semitic, so they don't want to be seen as promoting anti Semitism in a big, you know, platform like this, and then also at the same time, trying to say that people on the left are anti Semitic. But, you know, again, this is part of, you know, what we've seen crop up on the right when white nationalists have gotten involved with politics.

[Miles Parks]

Well, the other thing I wonder about in terms of whether this issue is a thornier issue for conservatives versus progressives is the Republican Party over the last few years has really campaigned on this idea of no censorship, you know, anti cancel culture. And how. I mean, I wonder about how does that play into this in terms of does that make it more difficult to then set boundaries when you do decide that something is too far?

[Sarah McCammon]

I mean, I think it clearly does. You saw that conversation sort of being worked out, you know, almost in real time in that Heritage foundation staff meeting where people were saying, look, you know, there is a line. There has to be a line. Look back at history. We've drawn lines before. This is the argument there's a difference between cancel culture and having a sort of sense of who we are and who our values are. But I do think you make a good point, Miles. And in an environment where we're not canceling people, where we're being open to any kind of conversation is sort of a point of pride. It makes it harder to draw those lines. And so I think perhaps what we're seeing is at least one dividing line here is between maybe the old school, traditional conservative movement and the new, maybe younger far right movement that's arisen online in recent years, and particularly in the.

[Domenico Montanaro]

Trump era, there can certainly be a good for me, but not for the equality. And, you know, that kind of hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty, certainly can hurt you politically. But I think what we've really found here is that a lot of what's coming from the right, as far as the standing up for free speech and wanting conservatives not to be censored on campuses, is not really a principled line. It's about politics and about being able to make sure that their point of view is heard, not necessarily that they're suppressing the other side.

[Miles Parks]

Well, I kind of want to bring it back to the nitty gritty politics of all of this, because I think my basic instinct tells me that bringing people on the ideological fringe who say offensive things into the fold will naturally alienate more centrist, more moderate voters. Does this really matter, I guess, to the median voter the way we think it does?

[Domenico Montanaro]

There are a lot of things that matter to people. Right. But not everything is motivating to for people to go to the polls. Some people maybe, you know, don't like Trump's personality or the way he does things or the voice that he gives to extreme comments, but they liked in the first term, you know, how he was economically or whatever. Right. People have a lot of different things that motivate them to vote. Obviously, in the last election, it was about cost of living and affordability, and we saw that come into this election last week as well. And I think that's going to be the dominant issue that carries on to the 2026 midterm elections, most likely, too.

[Sarah McCammon]

And I think if there's one thing that the last decade or so has taught us, it's that where the hard lines are for some people may be different from where they are for Donald Trump himself. I mean, I think this has been widely observed. It's something I've seen in many conversations with Trump supporters at many rallies and elsewhere over the years. This idea that, you know, whatever he says, however it may sound, however it may land at the time and whatever the blowback may be, his supporters willing to hear it, however he wants them to hear it, and they're willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. They tend to say, you know, that's just how Trump talks. So, you know, can Tucker Carlson get away with it? Can Kevin Roberts get away with it? I don't know. But Donald Trump has pretty consistently been able to because he has, you know, that really robust and enduring base that we talk about so much.

[Miles Parks]

All right. Well, we can leave it there for today. I'm Miles Parks. I cover voting.

[Sarah McCammon]

I'm Sarah McKimman. I covered politics.

[Domenico Montanaro]

And I'm Domenico Montanaro, senior political editor and correspondent.

[Miles Parks]

And thank you for listening to the NPR Politics podcast.

[Sarah McCammon]

There are tens of thousands of veterans behind bars in the US Often without any of the mental health services they may need.

[Domenico Montanaro]

When you go to prison, you automatically lose your benefits as a veteran.

[Sarah McCammon]

You become a ward of the state. How much do we owe these veterans who have fought our wars? Listen now to the Sunday story on the up first podcast from npr. This message is from Synchrony bank who wants to remind you to stay flexible.

[Domenico Montanaro]

Not the yoga bending circus performing kind.

[Sarah McCammon]

Of flexible, financially flexible, like with their high yield savings account. Stay [e-mail] NPR member FDIC on NPR's Wildcard podcast, Padma Lakshmi says she feels better at 55 than 25.

[Miles Parks]

I wouldn't go back to my 20s.

[Sarah McCammon]

For all the money in the world.

[Miles Parks]

I really wouldn't. I was so hard on myself about.

[Domenico Montanaro]

Every little thing or every, you know, imperfection.

[Sarah McCammon]

Watch or listen to that Wildcard conversation on the NPR app or on YouTube @NPRWildcard.