Summary of "Why Wisconsin's Supreme Court Election Matters Nationally" – NPR Politics Podcast
Podcast Information:
- Title: The NPR Politics Podcast
- Host/Author: NPR
- Episode: Why Wisconsin's Supreme Court Election Matters Nationally
- Release Date: March 19, 2025
Introduction
In the March 19, 2025 episode of The NPR Politics Podcast, hosts Tamara Keith and Domenico Montanaro delve into the significance of the upcoming Wisconsin Supreme Court election scheduled for April 1. Joined by Anya Van Wagtendonk from Wisconsin Public Radio, the discussion highlights the race's implications not only for Wisconsin but also for the national political landscape.
The Candidates and Ideological Stakes
Candidates Overview
Anya Van Wagtendonk introduces the two primary candidates vying for the Wisconsin Supreme Court seat:
-
Brad Schimmel (Conservative):
- Current position: Judge in Waukesha County
- Background: Former Republican Attorney General and District Attorney
-
Susan Crawford (Liberal):
- Current position: Judge in Dane County (Madison)
- Background: Former employee of Democratic Attorney General and Governor; private practice experience with clients like Planned Parenthood
Key Insight: Domenico Montanaro emphasizes, "they really do represent kind of the two sides of the ideological spectrum" (01:31).
Impact on Court Composition
With the court currently holding a 4-3 liberal majority and one liberal justice retiring, the election outcome will determine whether the court leans more liberal or conservative. This balance is crucial for future decisions on contentious issues such as abortion and labor rights.
Money and Influence in the Race
Record-Breaking Expenditures
The Wisconsin Supreme Court race has become the most expensive judicial election in the state's history, with expenditures surpassing previous records. As of last week, approximately $60 million has been invested, with projections reaching up to $100 million by election day (04:31).
Major Donors and Backers
-
Brad Schimmel:
- Backed by Elon Musk, who has contributed over $11 million.
- Supported by various conservative groups.
-
Susan Crawford:
- Supported by the Democratic Party, George Soros, and Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker.
- Funds come from national parties and mega donors advocating for abortion rights and other liberal causes.
Notable Quote: Domenico Montanaro states, "What does it mean to get these big donations? Will it sway their decisions...?" (05:51).
Concerns Over Donor Influence
Both candidates accuse each other of partisanship despite the race being officially nonpartisan. For instance, Crawford and her supporters allege that Musk aims to "buy a judge on the Supreme Court in order to win a suit that will help his business" (05:51).
National Implications
Proxy for National Sentiment
Tamara Keith highlights that the Wisconsin Supreme Court election serves as an early indicator of the national political climate, especially ahead of the 2028 elections. The race reflects broader frustrations and divisions, particularly regarding former President Trump's influence and Elon Musk's increasing role in politics.
Key Points:
- Swing State Dynamics: Wisconsin's status as a swing state means the election results could signal national trends.
- Judicial Impact: Decisions on election conduct, congressional districting, and collective bargaining in Wisconsin can have national reverberations.
Voter Engagement and Party Enthusiasm
Tamara Keith discusses the election as a "temperature check of the activism within the Democratic base," especially in light of recent polls showing Democratic favorability at historic lows (e.g., 29% in CNN's poll) (07:47). The ability of Democrats to mobilize voters in a typically lower-turnout, off-year election will be crucial.
The Role of Elon Musk
Musk's Increasing Political Involvement
Elon Musk's significant financial contribution to Brad Schimmel's campaign, along with his broader political ambitions, marks a new chapter in his involvement in politics. Tamara Keith notes, "He donated something like a quarter billion dollars to Donald Trump's campaign efforts" and is now actively shaping judicial races (10:57).
Notable Quote: Musk's favorability rating stands at 39%, indicating mixed public perception (11:36).
Future Political Engagements
The podcast discusses whether Musk views his involvement in the Wisconsin race as a one-time event or the beginning of a more sustained political influence. The substantial funds he invests suggest a potential for ongoing political activity.
Voter Sentiment and Nationalization of Politics
National Issues at the Forefront
Participants observe that voters in Wisconsin are increasingly considering national issues when casting their ballots in state elections. This trend underscores the nationalization of politics, where local races are influenced by broader national debates and figures.
Key Insight: Domenico Montanaro remarks, "All politics in many ways has become national" (09:57).
Conclusion
The Wisconsin Supreme Court election is not just a state-level judicial race but a pivotal event with significant national implications. The massive financial investments, ideological battles, and involvement of high-profile figures like Elon Musk highlight the race's importance in shaping both Wisconsin's judicial landscape and reflecting broader national political currents. As the election approaches, the outcomes will offer valuable insights into party dynamics, voter engagement, and the evolving role of money in politics.
Notable Quotes:
- "They really do represent kind of the two sides of the ideological spectrum." — Domenico Montanaro (01:31)
- "What does it mean to get these big donations? Will it sway their decisions...?" — Domenico Montanaro (05:51)
- "He donated something like a quarter billion dollars to Donald Trump's campaign efforts..." — Tamara Keith (10:57)
- "All politics in many ways has become national." — Domenico Montanaro (09:57)
Timestamps:
This summary provides an overview of the key discussions and insights from the NPR Politics Podcast episode on Wisconsin's Supreme Court election, capturing the essential elements for listeners and non-listeners alike.