← The Observable Unknown
The Observable Unknown
Mailbag XXXIV: When Every Conversation Becomes a Trial | Difficult Mothers, Eric Berne, Games People Play, Transactional Analysis, Family Conflict, Boundaries, Widowhood, and The Cost of the Move
00:07:26
Loading summary
Transcript3 lines
- [00:03]
Dr. Ray
After a full year of commercial free
- [00:05]
Narrator/Host
listening, the Observable Unknown is now quietly opening its doors to a select circle of sponsors. We are considering both private patrons and public facing business partnerships with several levels of support available for individuals, organizations, and brands whose values suit the character of the show. If you'd like to discuss sponsoring the Observable Unknown, you may text me directly at 336-675-5836 or email doctor@theobservableunknown.com Discretion is welcome and curiosity is encouraged.
- [00:39]
Dr. Ray
Welcome back to the Observable Unknown. Today's letter comes from Suzanne L. Suzanne writes, Dear Dr. Ray, I don't know what else to do with my mother. She's very bitter, negative, critical, and insulting toward me and my husband, and she clearly prefers my sister's children to mine. I have tried to connect with her as especially since she became a widow, but every conversation returns to old grievances and ends badly. It feels as though we speak different languages. I keep trying to become the daughter she seems to want, but nothing works. You've discussed Eric Byrne and games people play. Could his work help me understand what's happening? I don't think my mother has much time left, and I desperately want to repair the relationship. Sincerely, Suzanne L. Suzanne, your letter contains two competing fears. Contact with your mother keeps hurting you, yet losing her before anything changes feels unbearable. One part of you wants protection another wants one final chance. That urgency can keep you entering the same conversation while hoping love, effort, or limited time will somehow change its structure. Usually the structure wins. Eric Byrne's transactional analysis may help because it focuses on what happens between people. Byrne described three broad ecostates. The parent carries absorbed judgment, rules, warning, and care. The child carries early fear, longing, rebellion, and adapt. The adult responds to present reality. Your mother may speak from what Byrne called the critical parent. She tells you that your questions, efforts, and loyalties remain inadequate. You then move into the adapted child. You explain, defend, try harder, and search for the answer that might finally earn approval. The subject changes, but the result doesn't. Your mother feels misunderstood. You feel that nothing you do will ever be enough. That recurring structure is what Byrne called a game. A game isn't always conscious manipulation. It's an interaction that repeatedly travels toward a familiar emotional ending. The way out isn't to perform your role more beautifully it's to stop taking it automatically. My book, the Cost of the Scripts, Bodies, Consequences, and Exit Strategies, begins where Byrne's catalog leaves off. Byrne helps us identify the game through the cost of the move. I ask what keeps the pattern alive, what each person's habitual move protects, what it costs, and how someone can exit without creating another version of the same conflict. Your explaining may once have helped preserve connection. Her criticism may protect control, authority or distance. Now both moves maintain a painful equilibrium. So ask, what does this pattern keep stable and what is it costing everyone? You wrote that you're trying to become the daughter your mother always wanted. That sentence reveals the trap. You aren't meeting her as one adult meeting another. You're auditioning, and every conversation becomes another review. By engaging her, you allow her to keep litigating the past. Love can't remain healthy when one person performs and the other decides whether the performance was sufficient. Change the goal. Don't enter the next conversation trying to win approval or resolve the entire past. Try to create one bounded encounter between two adults. Perhaps 20 minutes, maybe less. You might say, mom, I want a relationship with you. But when our conversations become insulting, or when my husband and children are criticized, I'm going to end the conversation and try again another day. I'm not punishing you. I'm trying to give us a chance to speak more kindly. Then practice it. If she becomes insulting, don't defend yourself for 40 minutes. Don't answer every grievance. Just say, I want to speak with you, but I won't continue while we're talking this way. I'll call again Sunday, then end the conversation calmly. In the cost of the move, this is is a minimal declarative boundary. It doesn't try to win the argument, it only interrupts the script. The re entry point matters. Saying I'll call Sunday distinguishes a boundary from abandonment. Timing matters too. Insight offered during escalation becomes more fuel. Leave before the conversation reaches its familiar ending, then return when both nervous systems are calmer. You may also give the past a specific kind of container. Say, I know there are things from the past that still hurt you. I'm willing to spend one conversation listening to what matters the most. But we can't reopen every injury every time we speak. Some of our relationship has to belong to the present. She may accept that invitation, or she may turn it into another prosecution. Her response will show you what kind of relationship is actually possible. You might also change how you approach what matters to her. Your questions may be sincere, but she may hear analysis when she wants witness. Instead of asking several questions, try tell me what you most wish I understood. Then reflect one thing back. What I hear is that this mattered, because listening isn't confession and understanding isn't agreement. The moment she becomes insulting, the listening ends. Your husband and children also deserve protection. Children notice, preference, contempt, comparison and exclusion. Your wish to repair things with your mother can't require them to absorb the same wound if she treats them unkindly. Visits may need to become shorter, more structured, or supervised closely enough that you can intervene. Repair with one generation shouldn't be purchased through injury to the next. You're afraid time is running out. That fear is real, but limited time doesn't require unlimited tolerance. Late life reconciliation may not become complete or cinematic. The available repair may be a peaceful cup of coffee, a short call without accusation, a photograph shared or one honest sentence. Something like, I know we've hurt each other and I don't want the final chapter to contain only that a small repair is still real. You could also invite her to one session with a family therapist, grief counselor, clergy member or mediator. Say, I'm not asking someone to decide which of us is right. I want help. Having one conversation that doesn't become another wound, she may refuse. You can offer the bridge. You can't cross it from both directions. Suzanne, your mother may not be capable of meeting you in the form you've imagined. That doesn't mean no relationship as possible. It may mean the possible relationship requires shorter conversations, safer subjects, firmer boundaries, and fewer attempts to extract tenderness from someone who answers with criticism. That isn't surrender, it's proportion. Eric Byrne can help you recognize the game. My book, the Cost of the Move, asks you to notice the script, the bodily state that activates it, the price of remaining inside it, and the timing of a clean exit. Your task isn't to win, it's to stop making the move that guarantees the old ending. Speak from the adult. Offer one honest Refuse contempt without becoming contemptuous. Protect your children and your husband. Leave room for grief and measure repair not by whether your mother finally becomes the woman you needed, but by whether you can meet her without disappearing. If this mailbag helped you recognize a painful family game or the cost of the move you keep making inside it, make that known. Leave a rating or a review not for recognition, for signal. So someone who has spent a lifetime auditioning for love may finally enter the room as themselves. Until next time, remember, you don't become what you feel you become what you return to. And what you return to returns as you.