The Rest Is Politics, Episode 477 – How Trump’s Security Strategy Destroys the Old World Order
Hosts: Alastair Campbell & Rory Stewart
Date: December 10, 2025
Main Theme/Purpose
In this episode, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart dedicate their discussion to the newly released Trump National Security Strategy. They dissect its philosophy, unprecedented bluntness, and what it signals for America’s alliances and the global order—particularly Europe. The hosts position the document as a seismic break with the past, shifting American tone from collaborative leadership to naked, transactional unilateralism. They evaluate the risks, motives, and likely European consequences as the US moves from partner to “punisher” and disrupts the post-WWII international order.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. The New National Security Strategy: A Break with the Past
- Seismic Shift: Both hosts stress how dramatically different the document is from prior national security strategies, including Trump’s own earlier version.
- “It’s confirmation of a changed worldview…America ripping its own mask off, saying we're all the worst things that our enemies always said we were.” (Alastair Campbell, 00:33)
- Structure and Tone:
- The document is “very, very short and very, very blunt,” focusing on Western Europe as a main adversary rather than Russia or China (04:50–07:30).
- Directly attacks European attempts to restrict the far right, urges support for “patriotic parties,” and singles out countries like Hungary as preferred allies.
- The Trump Corollary:
- Declares Latin America off-limits to foreign (non-US) military or investment, updating the Monroe Doctrine with a new self-serving twist (04:50–08:32).
2. Contrast with Prior Strategies
- Bush (2002): Emphasized American leadership through alliances and promotion of liberal democracy.
- Obama (2010): Recognized American constraints post-financial crisis, prioritized alliances and burden-sharing.
- Biden: Focused on the struggle between democracies and revisionist autocracies, stressed interconnected global challenges (e.g. climate, pandemics).
- First Trump Strategy (2017): Still realistic but principled, acknowledging American generosity and need for alliances.
- Current Trump Strategy: Alliance-breaking, isolationist, dismisses international institutions, works to “rearm nation-states” regardless of democratic credentials (12:46–17:59).
3. Europe as the Primary Target
- Hostility to Europe:
- Europe described as a region with “minority governments trampling on democracy”, coded language for liberal efforts to contain the far right (04:50–08:32).
- Document calls for supporting Europe’s far right, “patriotic parties,” implying active American interference in European domestic politics.
- Shift from Russia and China as Threats:
- Russia/China “kind of neutral”—far less concern than in previous strategies, with Russia portrayed more as a potential partner in restoring order than as an aggressor (08:36–11:32).
- “If you’re reading this from a Russian perspective, you’re basically thinking they’ve sort of copied and pasted a lot of our thoughts on the Europe stuff.” (Alastair Campbell, 08:36)
4. Strategic Consequences for Europe
- Vulnerability:
- “It makes Europe more vulnerable than we've been in our lifetime.” (Rory Stewart, 00:55 & 45:31)
- Vassalage, not Partnership:
- Europe expected to spend on defense (mostly US kit), support US interests in areas like Gaza, open economies to US tech, but no longer treated as equals (24:55–27:03).
- “We're not partners or allies anymore, we're vassals. And if we twitch a tail, we're going to be punished beyond imagining.” (Alastair Campbell, 00:48, repeated sentiment at 24:55)
- Divide and Rule:
- US uses economic/tech dependence to threaten individual allies, as with shutting down access for ICC officials or muscling UAE on AI/investment choices (27:37–28:16).
5. Tech, Sovereignty, and the Role of the EU
- Destruction of the European Union as a Goal:
- “This is about trying to destroy the one international organization that still believes in the rule of law, that still believes in human rights, that still believes in international law.” (Rory Stewart, 24:06)
- US strategy aligns with anti-EU, anti-sovereignty rhetoric of US tech billionaires like Elon Musk and political actors in Russia (20:46–24:06).
- Tech weaponization:
- Spectacular illustration of US tech leverage and willingness to intimidate both governments and individuals globally.
6. Race, Demographics, and the Far Right
- Coded Language Decoded:
- Discussion about “majority non-European” NATO members interpreted as “majority non-white,” tying into broader US/European far right anxieties about migration and national identity (35:03–37:48).
- Direct US Support for the European Far Right:
- US policy document now openly sides with parties such as Germany’s AfD, as confirmed by AfD spokesman’s reaction (11:32–12:46).
- Heritage, Identity, and Danger:
- Supporting armed nationalist governments in Europe could destabilize the continent and create opportunities for Russia (35:03–39:51).
7. Strategic Intent—Chaos as a Tool?
- Strategic Chaos or Hubris?:
- Debate over whether Trump and his team desire chaos, believing it will play to their advantage—or are simply reckless and self-aggrandizing (44:12–45:03).
- “I sometimes wonder whether…they don't desire chaos. At some level…they thrive in chaos.” (Alastair Campbell, 44:12)
- Blatant, Unapologetic Boldness:
- Hosts question why US would lay out its disruptive plans so openly, concluding Trump’s base is attracted to “authenticity” and that narcissism and media spectacle drive decisions (39:51–41:47).
- “No Dr. Evil announces their evil plan.” (Alastair Campbell, 39:51)
8. Undermining the Old World Order—Legitimacy and Soft Power
- Abandonment of Soft Power:
- “It’s America ripping its own mask off, saying we're all the worst things that our enemies always said we were.” (Alastair Campbell, 49:04)
- Hosts note this is unprecedented: previous superpowers, including the US in previous eras, have always valued the appearance of legitimacy and ideals, even when acting in pure self-interest (49:04–50:40).
9. Implications for the UK and Global Politics
- UK Diminished:
- US only refers to Britain and Ireland sentimentally, not strategically, underlining the end of any “special relationship” (48:06–49:04).
- A Generational Battle:
- Campbell calls for European publics to recognize the stakes, urging them to resist hard-right advances which, he believes, play into both US and Russian plans (45:31–49:04).
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- On the Document’s Significance:
- “It’s the sort of bible of Trump foreign policy.” (Alastair Campbell, 00:19 & 50:40)
- On Europe’s New Status:
- “We're not partners or allies anymore, we're vassals. And if we twitch a tail, we're going to be punished beyond imagining.” (Alastair Campbell, 00:48, echoed throughout)
- “It makes Europe more vulnerable than we've been in our lifetime.” (Rory Stewart, 00:55 & 45:31)
- On the Shift in Strategy:
- “No Dr. Evil announces their evil plan.” (Alastair Campbell, 39:51)
- “It's America ripping its own mask off, saying we're all the worst things that our enemies always said we were.” (Alastair Campbell, 00:33 & 49:04)
- On US Relations with Far Right:
- Matthias Muzdorf (AfD): “Everything the AfD has always said is now United States strategy...” (11:32–12:46)
- On the Destruction of the EU:
- “This is about trying to destroy the one international organization that still believes in the rule of law…” (Rory Stewart, 24:06)
- On Strategic Chaos:
- “I've used this phrase before about Trump, strategic chaos. ...But there is a strategy to it. That's the point.” (Rory Stewart, 45:03)
- On Legitimacy:
- “It’s been very important for America to deny [imperialism] and say, no, that isn’t the nature of our relationships … What’s so odd about this document is it’s America ripping its own mask off. … That’s never been true. Historically, it’s a mad vision.” (Alastair Campbell, 49:04–50:40)
- On the UK’s Diminished Role:
- “America is understandably, sentimentally attached to the European continent and of course to Britain and Ireland. ...We're no longer part of Europe.” (Rory Stewart, quoting the document, 48:06–49:04)
Key Timestamps for Important Segments
| Timestamp | Segment | Key Content/Notes | | --------- | -------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | | 00:19 | Overview of the Trump strategy as a seismic shift | | 04:50 | First impressions and comparison to past strategies | | 07:30 | Explanation of the Trump Corollary and the Monroe Doctrine update | | 11:32 | Matthias Muzdorf (AfD) reads US strategy aligns with European right | | 12:46 | Deep dive on history of US National Security Strategies | | 17:59 | How the new document was written (Trump, not interagency) | | 20:46 | Tech, free speech, and anti-EU sentiment | | 24:06 | US target on the EU’s back; end of US belief in European integration | | 27:03 | US use of tech and finance to pressure allies | | 35:03 | Race and "heritage" issues exposed in the document | | 39:51 | Why be so open about a disruptive global strategy? | | 44:12 | Is chaos the strategy or the endgame? | | 45:31 | Strategic chaos, Europe’s vulnerability, and Russia’s ambitions | | 49:04 | Discussion of legitimacy and soft power, US “ripping off the mask” | | 50:40 | Concluding thoughts on the document’s impact and message |
Flow & Tone
- Language: Intelligent but accessible, sometimes caustically direct; a blend of historical analysis, wariness, and occasional dark humor.
- Tone: Urgent, analytical, at times incredulous at the bluntness of the Trump administration’s stated positions; sober about the consequences for the UK and Europe.
- Dynamic: Both hosts challenge each other, dig into the history and motivations behind the document, and stress the need for a new European response.
Takeaways
- Trump’s new National Security Strategy is not just another policy tweak: it is, in Alastair Campbell’s words, “the most significant document we've seen,” featuring blunt acknowledgments of American self-interest, disdain for alliances, and open support for European far-right parties.
- The strategy signals a deliberate US rupture with postwar alliances, threatens European unity and security, and upends long-standing norms of international relations.
- The document’s brazenness suggests it is as much for domestic audience consumption as it is for foreign policy, riding a wave of “strategic chaos” and media spectacle.
- Both hosts urge European governments and publics to recognize the seriousness of the shift and begin to plan for a world in which the US is no longer a reliable partner—or may be a deliberate adversary.
For listeners new to the episode, this discussion offers a clear, critical, and detailed breakdown of how Trump’s foreign policy doctrine is more than headline rhetoric: it is a foundational, perilous change in America’s approach to Europe, global governance, and the international system itself.
