The Rest Is Politics – Episode 503: Andrew’s Arrest: What Next?
Release Date: February 19, 2026
Host: Alastair Campbell
Guest: Lord Charlie Falconer (former Solicitor General, Secretary of State for Justice, Lord Chancellor)
Absent Co-Host: Rory Stewart (on half-term holiday)
Overview
This emergency episode focuses on the seismic news of the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, at Sandringham. Campbell and Falconer break down the legal, constitutional, and reputational implications for the monarchy and wider British society. The arrest, which relates to possible misconduct in public office rather than the previously reported sexual abuse allegations linked to Jeffrey Epstein, prompts deep discussion on justice, precedent, and the future of the Royal Family.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
The Shock of Andrew's Arrest
- (03:29) Alistair Campbell: Asks Falconer how shocked he was that "the King's brother... is spending his 66th birthday in a police station being grilled about a crime which, if proven, carries with it the prospect of life imprisonment."
- (03:50) Charlie Falconer: Initial astonishment, but less surprised due to:
- Release of "Epstein files": "everybody recoiling in horror in what they're reading about a whole range of people."
- Mounting pressure on law enforcement to demonstrate that "everybody is equal before the law," especially after high-profile revelations.
The Arrest Procedure: Was it Heavy-Handed?
- (04:45) Campbell: Wonders about the necessity and optics of a dramatic police arrest.
- (05:22) Falconer: Legally, arresting someone only happens when "necessary":
- Usual criteria: flight risk, potential to destroy evidence, etc.
- In this case, likely motivated to show seriousness and to quickly secure potential evidence (phones, computers).
- "You would very frequently arrest somebody... because you want, without them having the chance to, as it were, prepare themselves properly, ask them lots of questions."
Legal Explanation: Misconduct in Public Office
- (06:45) Campbell: Seeks detail about the charge; notes "misconduct in public office" prompts thoughts about politicians like Boris Johnson.
- (07:37) Falconer: Key requirements for this crime:
- Must be a "public official" (not just a member of the Royal Family—it’s the office that matters, e.g., UK Trade Envoy).
- Must "deliberately misperform" their office in a way that "reduces the standing" of the person and is "done deliberately."
- "It's got to be so awful as to make reasonable people think this really is an abuse of your office."
- High bar for prosecution.
Historical Precedent for Arresting Royals
- (10:15) Campbell: Expresses disbelief; asks about historical parallels.
- (10:43) Falconer: "In modern times, no Royal has ever been arrested." Only precedent: Charles I, who was treated as a "prisoner of war" post-civil war, not subject to criminal investigation as today.
The Role of Pressure, Epsteins Files & Institutional Responsibility
- (11:31) Campbell: The weight of public and political expectation; Prime Minister and former PM Gordon Brown have commented, possibly emboldening police action.
- (12:27) Falconer: "Is it more than permission? Is the pressure not absolutely immense to do something?"
- Speed of the investigation is highly unusual, likely spurred by recent Epstein file releases.
- "Enormous pressure on the authorities to act and they have to be seen to be saying nobody's immune."
The King's Statement: Analysis & Impact
- (14:06) Campbell: Reviews King Charles’ public statement, emphasizing "the institution is above all this."
- Quotes Charles: "Let me state clearly, the law must take its course... Meanwhile, my family and I will continue in our duty and service to you all."
- (15:39) Falconer: "Put aside the question of pr? I thought it was an incredibly impressive statement."
- The message is: "my duty comes before my family," a notable prioritization of institution over blood.
Damage to the Monarchy
- (17:09) Falconer: "This is immensely damaging for the Royal family... If it’s the family you’re offering to the country, then the family looks like it may have a very big cheek in it... this cloud now hangs over them."
- (18:23) Campbell: Compares to the Queen’s "annus horribilis"—this is "far, far more serious," mainly due to the gravity of the alleged crimes and the criminal nature of the charges.
Comparison to the U.S. and the Epstein Fallout
- (20:27) Campbell: Notes how fewer U.S. figures seem impacted, compared to the British.
- (21:22) Falconer: Some U.S. figures (e.g., Larry Summers) face scrutiny, but "very little kickback on Trump," who is frequently named in the files.
- "Is it because Trump has completely cauterized himself from sexual scandal in a whole variety of ways. So you can't kill him... politically."
Political Authenticity & Double Standards
- (23:31) Campbell: Wonders if Trump’s culture of impunity has eroded accountability.
- (23:31) Falconer: "His authenticity gives him impunity, does it not? ...He is just as awful as he appears."
- Cites Billy Bush interview: Trump’s supporters accept or dismiss egregious behavior as "boys' banter," allowing him to survive scandals.
Long-Term Consequences for the Royals
-
(25:13) Falconer: Predicts protracted legal process ("this will run literally for years now").
- "If there is a trial, it will be a trial that will have to be presided over by the Lady Chief Justice.... It will be a trial the like of which has never been seen in the history of trials."
- This "long-term corrosion is harder to assess."
-
(26:46) Campbell: King William’s public coldness toward Andrew recalled ("effective body language communication"), potentially setting the future tone for the monarchy.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- Charlie Falconer on legal necessity of arrest:
"You're only allowed under the law to arrest somebody if it's, quote, necessary to do so. And the normal things about necessity are, are you going to flee the country, are you somebody who might start to damage property?... The effect of arresting Andrew Mountbatten Windsor was... the police can ask him questions... and take away from his home... evidence." (05:22) - On misconduct in public office:
"It's got to be so awful as to make reasonable people think this really is an abuse of your office and you've got to have no reasonable excuse for it." (07:37) - On historic precedent:
"In modern times, no Royal has ever been arrested... There's never, ever, ever been anything like this in modern times, or indeed in pre modern times." (10:43) - On institutional implications:
"Andrew Mountbatten Windsor is the clearest demonstration that nobody is above the law." (13:43) - On the King's statement:
"My duty comes before my family. And that last bit, when he says, we will continue in our duty and service to the nation is a very striking statement, is it not, of somebody saying, my family have to be sacrificed?" (15:39) - On unprecedented damage:
"The allegations against Andrew... are so much worse than anything that occurred during the annus horribilis.... If it’s the family you’re offering to the country, then the family looks like it may have a very big cheek in it in relation to the way that he has behaved." (19:11) - On Trump and American justice:
"His authenticity gives him impunity, does it not? He is authentically not trying to present himself in the way that so many politicians do.... [Trump] is just as awful as he appears." (23:31) - On the coming trial:
"It will be a trial the like of which has never been seen in the history of trials, basically. And this is two, three years down the track. And it's that sort of corrosion that is going to have a major effect." (25:50)
Timestamps for Important Segments
- Emergency context & guest introduction: 02:09
- Initial reaction & media coverage: 03:29
- Legal necessity and arrest procedure: 04:45
- Misconduct in public office–legal explanation: 06:45
- Unprecedented arrest of a royal: 10:43
- King's statement & PR analysis: 14:06
- Long-term effects on monarchy: 17:09, 25:13
- Epstein, US vs UK public scrutiny: 20:27, 21:22
- Trump's impunity & authenticity: 23:31
Episode Tone & Style
The conversation is sober, meticulous, and occasionally laced with dry humor. Campbell guides the debate with urgency and clarity; Falconer brings seasoned legal expertise, historical perspective, and nuanced critique. The mood is serious throughout, reflecting the gravity of the events discussed, yet avoids partisanship or sensationalism.
Summary Takeaway
"Andrew’s Arrest: What Next?" stands as a landmark discussion on an historic moment for the British monarchy, raising urgent debates about justice, accountability, and tradition. The hosts conclude that while King Charles’ statement showed leadership, the monarchy now faces perhaps its gravest institutional test in living memory, with unprecedented legal, political, and cultural repercussions set to play out for years to come.