Transcript
Bruce Wagner (0:02)
As a writer, I attack and destroy bullshit.
Rich Roll (0:09)
Bruce Wagner has had a prolific and eccentric career. Wagner just takes you straight to the contradiction, apocalyptic, yet ultimately spiritual view of humanity as seen through the lens of Hollywood. You are a fascinating character to me. I want to enter the Wagner extended universe here.
Bruce Wagner (0:25)
I never wrote for a reader, ever. I explore every forbidden place in myself. And there's only one thing I'm really worried about from the moment I put my head on the pillow and it's book sales. What are my book sales?
Rich Roll (0:49)
Bruce, I'm delighted to have you here today. As I mentioned to you a moment ago, I just. I want to enter the Wagner extended universe here and just kind of marinate in your ethos and sensibility. I mean, you're somebody who has written many books, 15 now, 15 novels, something like that. And effectively used Hollywood, as you have mentioned, as this laboratory for need and vanity, as your sort of palette, as this mirror for human behavior. Everybody has their longing and they are seeking. And what you're interested in is that kind of spiritual journey towards transcendence. And it's the transcendent piece, it's the spirituality that has baked into all of this that interests me the most.
Bruce Wagner (1:34)
Yeah, you know, my nature is fiery and it's operatic, theatrical, and it's also laser like for me in my observational powers. I've been thinking a lot about writer, the scent of writers, like the scent of a woman, the scent of a writer. And what attracts, what is my scent and what themes or notions attract me. Hollywood had a perfect scent for me because I was someone that was possessed by the notions of extremity, of extreme wealth and houselessness or poverty that one is brutalized almost to death by. I was possessed by celebrity and renown and invisibility and the tension between those poles. You know, I often think of a Buddhist story, a beautiful, magnificent book called Liberation in the Palm of youf Hand, or One's Hand, I might have the title wrong. And in that they talk of so many things and one of the things that's said is that vanity, the need to seek attention and approbation is one of the most difficult things to overcome. And the example they give is of a hermit who lived in a Cave for 35 years. And his mantra, his essence was he wanted to be the most well known hermit, you know, so I'm possessed by that. And yet, you know, my, my work early on was compared to Nathaniel West, Day of the Locust. I didn't read that book until a few years ago because I had been Compared to him so often that I was nervous about reading it. But the books that I did read, one had a tremendous influence on me was Fitzgerald's pat Hobby Stories, which are these ultimately quite poignant and dark stories, mirroring Fitzgerald's experience of an alcoholic screenwriter. And they're high comedy, but they are also eviscerating in that they are. There's such a sadness to them and such a fatalism to them. One aches for a pat hobby. You know, I'm losing. My first book was Force Majeure, followed by I'm Losing youg. And those books were kind of cataloged and characterized by their extremely dark view of Hollywood, which I'm not going to argue with. And I was called a satirist, which. Which I rebelled against at first. Now, I don't care what they. What they call me or how they categorize me. But the. The importance for me was there was an element missing ultimately from Nathaniel west and Fitzgerald, which is certainly not a flaw on their part. It didn't have a scent that attracted to them. I was attracted by the sacred and by transcendence. You know, this notion of conditional suffering. You know, the Buddhists speak of. The three sufferings that the Buddhists speak of are physical pain. You know, the pain of birth, death, illness, and then the fluctuation of moods is another kind of suffering that a day can contain great heights and great depths, which I think people who are bipolar experience in a more operatic way. And then the. Which also, that second mode of suffering is characterized by the notion of impermanence that underpins everything. The last suffering is the conditional suffering, which my interpretation is that the suffering imposed upon us by the social order. So the idea of escaping that was always something that appealed to me in literature, particularly in books of parables, either Buddhist parables or Sufi parables, to me. So I began to read many books and superimpose this desire and to make them redolent of this scent, this perfume that I adored. So I read Don Quixote, because I'd read a quote from Dostoevsky saying that it was the saddest book ever written. So I was immediately signed on. And it was rapturously sorrowful, but transcendent at the end. So I felt that in the mosaic of my work, the mandala of my work, that it was essential because I didn't want to be king of the hill. The one who lacerates had no desire to do that, no interest. I would have hung my guns up a long time ago if that was what I had to offer.
