Victor Davis Hanson (58:41)
I don't know. As soon as anybody read about it and that was in early 2020. I wrote a couple of articles that it had to be the lab, not that I'm a scientist, but there had not been a human. There had been no animal with COVID before a human got it. So if it came from a pangolin or a bat, somebody could find a pangolin or bat that had it and they went and they searched. The pangolin and bat population was not in Wuhan. I know there was an open market but there were not these animals running around with it. There was a Wuhan biology lab, security number four that was conducting gain of function research in Wuhan. Everybody remember that. In Wuhan it was run by soon by the People's Liberation Army. Anthony Fauci was routing money to it and instrumentation and expertise through Peter Dasich's Echo Health. That's not in dispute Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci and others when this outbreak was becoming newsworthy. In a series of messages, most of them redacted, but enough was not redacted to show they had real concern that we, the people, might understand this to be subsidized gain of function, research. None of that is in dispute. There was an effort on the part, and I can remember the press conference, he came out very early and he said, the data, if you look at the data points, Jack, look at the data points, they all point to a natural origin. There was no data points. He just said that. And when people started to connect the dots, as he suggested, they looked at the genetic sequence. Biologists did, and they said the cleavage site. They went through all of the particular possibilities of mutations, and they said, this is not like something that would be very likely in the natural world. We had Stephen Quay on three times. He said very. And he was very dispassionate. He was not political or ideological. He just said it would be very hard to recreate this genetic sequence in nature. It is designed to be infectious at each decision point, each crossroad on the genetic material. So everybody understood that. Jon Stewart said that, Tom Cotton said that. Nicholas Wade, the renowned science writer for the New York Times, said that, Bill Maher said that. And everybody, every time they said it, whether they were a celebrity or a scientist or a politician, this engineered outrage came up from the Biden administration. And what do I mean by that? I mean the National Institute of Allergy Infectious Diseases, Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, the National Institute of Health, the cdc, the fda, hhs, the intelligence agency, they all said the same thing. And so the question is, why? Now, let's go through the A, B, C, D alternatives. Number one, the Chinese were yelling from the very beginning, you're racist, racist, racist. Donald Trump calls it the Chinese virus, the Wuhan virus. That is racist, racist. The Chinese Communists, who were the most racist people in the world that wouldn't let African immigrants into McDonald's, when it broke out, had signs up and they thought they could appeal toward the liberal sensitivities of Americans. So we don't want to say it's Chinese. That would be racist. That's one alternate. And these are not mutually exclusive. Number two, the Biden family, as we now know from these archives, was heavily compromised by the ruling hierarchy in China. And there was the insinuation that if, if the Bidens came out, the Biden, CIA, FBI, intelligence agencies, and had a concerted effort to demand from China and say, 1 million Americans are dead because of your virus, and we want restitution, we want honesty. They would start to leak out all of the money that had gone to Hunter Biden and spread. That's another number two. Number three, Is it was just that our highest ranking health officials, when it was made illegal to conduct gain of function, wanted to continue it. Whether that was because, as they said, they wanted to make vaccines or they were working stealthily with DOD and they were afraid that the Chinese were developing bioweapons, biology, bioweapons. And we were falling behind because we were out. So DOD went over to Fauci and people and said, you can't. I know it's illegal, but can't you get your guy in there or can't you have some kind of information so we know what they're doing? That's number three. Number four, I think it was political. That's another. That Donald Trump, they really wanted to destroy him. The economy was booming in 2020. We were coming, coming out of COVID he was starting to be dead. Even in his approvals. He looked pretty good against a potential rival. There was peace in the world. And they really, really, really wanted to say that Donald Trump was a racist. And this whole idea that the Chinese cooked it up was more of this China bashing tariffs and China was let China alone, that kind of stuff. And that was really pushed by Nancy Pelosi and others, many of them with ties to China. And then of course, the fifth is, well, Victor, don't be so sophisticated. There was 330,000 Chinese students here. A percent or two were engaged in espionage. The other people were paying 110% of tuition, room and board. We had billions of dollars in investment by Wall Street, Silicon Valley. We had a lot of cross fertilization and no one wanted to rock that boat. And so they were going to lie that this was just. Oh, what was this? This is what they asked us to believe. If I was talking to me, they'd say, victor, you idiot. Now there was a pangolin and it just jumped into a human person. We don't know where that happened. It's just a coincidence that it was a mile away from the Wuhan lab. And it's just a coincidence that the original Chinese scientists who were knowledgeable of the origins have disappeared. And it's just a coincidence that we have a lockdown on all information. And it's just a coincidence that for at least the first two weeks or so, we banned all flights from, from Wuhan Wuhan to all other Chinese cities. But, you know, things happen. We let them go to Milan and jfk. A million people to the States, a million people to Europe that spread it. That's just a coincidence. So we all know that what happened, it was a Some type. There's only one mystery, Jack. It was a gain of function project with very sloppy rules by people who were too unsophisticated to be trusted with it, who were using foreign knowledge, foreign technology, foreign instrumentation. They couldn't even build their own lab. The French built it. And then we provided a lot of the instrumentation that they staffed it with and it escaped. And they tried to. As all totalitarian society, they tried to keep it quiet. And then when it was out it and they couldn't control it, it was just as well as the whole world got it than just the Chinese. And that's pretty much what it was. And then they had to lie about it. And they knew that Western society is very sensitive about racism and xenophobia. So then they played the wounded fawn. How dare you do this? Why? They cleaned up their act and eliminated all the people who might have had knowledge and would speak to the Western media. And then here in the United States in an election year, the left looked at this whole situation and they found it useful. The COVID lockdowns. And we now know from, I think Jay Bacharius got out the School of Epidemiology and what we see in Scandinavia, that it's a. It's as likely that more people died from decreased economic activity, suicide, drug abuse, spousal abuse, missed surgeries, missed consultations, and not even getting into the social fabric of the 2020 riots for 120 days. And what it did to the country and the looting and all, I think all of that madness was spurned in part by the COVID lockdowns. In any case, the left felt that this was valuable to suggest that it was a natural leak. You can't blame anybody but Donald Trump for allowing this to spread. That's what their attitude. And it worked. Without the COVID virus and without the lockdown, Donald Trump would have been president in 2020. And if anybody objected to that, and I can tell you that I did, but I wasn't one of the first, but I was one of the early people in three or four columns. And I had a letter from, as I said earlier, the Stanford alumni. And this person suggested that I should be professionally reprimanded, that I was unprofessional, that I was causing death. I wasn't talking about the lockdowns. I was talking about the origins of COVID And then he lied and said that I had gone on a radio show and said I was a doctor when somebody just said doctor because I had a PhD and I didn't correct Them and he said you were posing as a doctor. It was horrible. And the guy that one of the people from the alumni wrote a very nice letter and said, could you just please explain this so we can tell this person, call him off. And then that led to indirectly, after January, it was any. Anybody who was in a public or private situation that could communicate, writing a syndicated column, a podcast or at a major university, anybody who said that it was likely that come from the lab. The forces of repression, censorship, the left went after just like if you question Mask or you question the COVID thing. And they didn't go after, they tried to delete, destroy you. And so I'm kind of bitter about that. And then my close friend Scott Atlas, although he was more concerned on the wisdom of the lockdown, he also did say in commentaries that he supported the vaccination for older people and younger people. But he didn't think it would be an ironclad vaccination being infectious or infected. And he did think it was from the COVID lab. That was a whole package. If you bought into that package, have worries about COVID have worries about the vaccination being the cure. All have worries about the idea of a pangolin bat. That was it. You were done for. They went after you, right?