← The Victor Davis Hanson Show
Loading summary
Transcript73 lines
- [00:00]
Victor Davis Hanson
Fellow Americans, a shocking revelation from the Department of Government Efficiency demands your attention. DOGE investigators have already uncovered an astounding $115 billion in government fraud, with analysts suggesting hundreds of billions more will soon be exposed. This goes far beyond simple waste or mismanagement. We're witnessing the unraveling of systematic corruption that appears to have artificially inflated our economy for years. Reports indicate the previous administration channeled approximately $1.5 trillion through non governmental organizations, creating a facade of economic stability that was built on quicksand. Now, as this house of cards begins to collapse, financial experts are warning of an imminent short but deep recession that could devastate unprepared investors. Consider the sobering question, what will happen to your retirement savings when this fraudulent economic structure finally crumbles? Throughout civilization, across empires and economic systems, physical gold has consistently preserved wealth when currencies and paper investments failed. Shouldn't a portion of your retirement be held in an asset with a 5,000 year track record, one that can't be manufactured by government decree or manipulated through accounting fraud? American Alternative Assets is offering a complimentary wealth protection guide explaining how to shield your financial future from the coming downturn. You'll discover why current conditions may present the optimal moment to secure your wealth through precious metals. Don't delay until the fraud economy completely unravels. Call 8332- USA-Gold or visit victorlovesgold.com now to request your free wealth protection guide. That's 833-287-2465 or victorlovesgold.com safeguard your wealth, protect your future while there's still time.
- [02:11]
Sammy Wink
Hello and welcome to the Victor Davis Hansen Show. This is our Saturday edition where we look at something a little bit different in the middle segment, usually historical. And we're on important moments in both world and U.S. history in the 20th century. And today Victor's going to be talking about fascism. But before that, we've got lots of news stories. We'd like to look at the a little bit more on the polls as we looked at yesterday. And Jerome Powell has been criticized. He's the Federal Reserve head and he's been criticized by Donald Trump. And then finally, Christine Noem and Megyn Kelly have had a back and forth that we'll look at. So stay with this and we'll be right back.
- [02:58]
Quince Advertisement
Vacation season is nearly upon us this year. I'm treating myself to the luxe upgrades I deserve with Quince's high quality travel essentials at fair prices like lightweight shirts and shorts from $30 pants for any occasion. And comfortable lounge suits with premium luggage options and durable duffel bags to carry it all. The best part? All Quench Items are priced 50 to 80% less than similar brands. By partnering directly with top factories, Quince cuts out the cost of the middleman and passes the savings on to us. And Quince only works with factories that use safe, ethical and responsible manufacturing practices and premium fabrics and finishes. I love that Quince is my favorite store for affordable luxury at home or on vacation. Everything from Quince is not just a affordable but the path to easy, comfortable living, even when traveling with spring vacation season. Here I look to Quints for classy, comfortable and cute. I just recently added a light blue linen vest and a short crop sweater to my Quint collection and I'm excited to wear them as I go off, especially on my travels this spring. For your next trip, treat yourself to the luxe upgrades you you deserve from quint. Go to quint.com Victor for 365 day returns plus free shipping on your order. That's Q-U I N C E.com Victor to get free shipping and 365 day returns. Quint.com Victor and we'd like to thank Quint for sponsoring this the Victor Davis Hanson show if you're running a business, you know that every time you miss a call, you're leaving money on the table. When every customer conversation matters, you need a phone system that keeps up and helps you stay connected. That's why you need OpenPhone. OpenPhone is the number one business phone system that streamlines and scales your customer communication. It works through an app on your phone or computer, so no more carrying around two phones or using a landline. With OpenPhone your team can share one number and collaborate on customer calls and texts, just like a shared inbox. That way any teammate can pick up right where the last person left off, keeping response times faster than ever. Plus, with AI powered call transcripts and summaries, you'll be able to automate follow ups, ensuring you'll never miss a customer interaction again. So whether you're a one person operation drowning in calls and texts, or have a large team that needs better collaboration tools, Openphone is a no brainer. See why over 50,000 businesses trust Openphone to manage their businesses calls and texts. Openphone is offering my listeners 20% off your first six months at openphone.com Victor that's O P E N P-H-O-N-E.com Victor and if you have existing numbers with another service, Openphone will port them over at no extra charge, open phone, no missed calls, no missed customers. And we'd like to thank open phone for sponsoring the Victor Davis Hansen Show.
- [06:34]
Sammy Wink
Welcome back to the Victor Davis Hansen Show. So, Victor, I know that you wanted to say a little bit more on those polls since the Rasmussen report came out yesterday and showed that Donald Trump had a 50% approval and 48% disapproval, which was a significantly lower from the polls the day before, which put him at 57% approvals.
- [06:58]
Donald Trump
I was wondering, it's amazing that he's waging this counter revolution on the border, on immigration, on the universities, on trade, on Doge. And he's getting in the mainstream media, Legacy Media, NPR, PBS, Washington Post, New York Times, LA Times, Chicago Tribune, network news, cable news, except for Fox newsmax, completely negative coverage. And yet he's still, I can't believe it. He's still 50%, 51% in different polls, approval rating. And why is that? Is because there's one, people appreciate the fact that he said he's doing what he said he was going to do. Most people don't do that. They don't do that at all. Number two, they think government is too big and that it's wasteful. Number three, it filters down to the public that whatever debt, deficit, whatever it is, they might not know the actual numbers of a $37 trillion national debt or 2 trillion annual budget deficit or $1.1 trillion trade. They know that it's unsustainable and they know that the left has said it was unsustainable. But again, it's Trump's. He didn't have to do any of this. He could have just, just said I didn't spend any more than Biden did and keep going. And we get up to about 140% GDP. And whoever, when the music stopped, whoever was in the presidency and musical chairs, he would be doomed because a lot of bondholders would not buy any more US Debt or they would want to sell their US Debt. And so we'll see what happens. But he's still got a lot of support. And then there's one other thing, a third influence that explains his popularity. There is no alternative. The Democratic Party. I could just take a little detour. It's into what I would call crime porn. It is fascinated with unsavory individuals. Take Carmelo Anthony, the young black American 17 year old goes to the wrong side of a track mate, gets on a beef, says touch me and see what happens. Stabs him, a person in the heart, kills him, runs murder Maybe it's second degree murder. And all of a sudden the judge lets him out. Two hundred fifty thousand dollar bond. GoFundMe explodes. Four hundred thousand. The parents go into really immediately go into a gated wealthy community at $3,500, buy a $400,000 home, and then he is now a folk hero. And this is supposed to be another George Floyd or Trayvon Martin, but the case, or they say it's like Rittenhouse, Rittenhouse, Rittenhouse. He was white and he got off. No, he didn't get off. He went to trial, he paid him $2 million bond. He was in prison for, for 80, what, 85 days. And he was running away from people, they were charging him and trying to kill him. So I mean, it would be as if the deceased was chasing this person on the street and he turned around and stabbed him. And then even for stabbing them, he would be in jail for $2 million. So he's kind of now a folk hero. So is Mr. Garcia the Abrego Doncioni too? Yes, I'll get to him. But he's a hero. And the left doesn't understand that. They just. Anything that Trump touches, they go into this Pavlovian response. This is an issue. This is an issue that we can. So a senator from Maryland goes down, it's going to be the big issue. Because he was married and he was a Maryland man. No, he was an illegal alien and he came here and he was facing deportation in 2019. The judge, the district judge, the appellate, they looked at it. He was outside a Home Depot years ago with marijuana in his pocket, with cash, and with a Chicago Bulls. As somebody who lives in gang infested territory, I can tell you that not too far in Mendota, California, we had M13 take over Hope. The Chicago bill's insignia for a person who doesn't live in Chicago is an indication of gang activity. Informants in that gang said that he was a gang member, and then we were told he was a fine family man. Then it was disclosed that his girlfriend at the time and whom he married had filed two spousal abuse restraining orders against him. Hit her in the eye, punched her in the eye, slapped her, tore her clothes off. So the point is, the left wants to romanticize this person, make him a cause celeb. But do you really want to bring in somebody from another country illegally? He came illegally, so forget everything else. He's residing illegally and he's resisted deportation orders. He just ignored them. So if he had done nothing else he should have been deported. But he did do something else. He hit his girlfriend and beat her up basically twice. And he was affiliated with a gang member. He had drugs on him. He had cash on him. He had gang insignia on him. Why do you want somebody in the country illegally doing that? So maybe the Trump administration shouldn't have put him in the prison. But he said. And then he said if he went back, the gangs would threaten him. Well, why would they threaten him any more than anybody else threatened him unless they thought he was in a gang, is my point. So there were all these reasons not to say that, oh, he's guilty and he's committed a crime. It's just that we have a choice. And we don't like people coming in illegally, period. They should go back and try it again legally. But especially we don't like spousal abusers, and we don't like gang members, and we don't like people selling or possessing drugs. And if they do that, go back home, then we come to Luigi Mangione. He was basically a very skilled assassin. He scouted out everything. He went off the Internet. He got his little disguise. He ambushed a health executive and blew him apart. Killed him. Man that had children and who had worked his way up from nothing to be a health. And then we have Taylor Lorenz and these other people defending him. And he's now a cause celeb. In fact, the youth of the Democratic Party love him. And so then we go into Mahmoud Khalil. Mahmoud Khalil came here on a green card, a student visa to Columbia University as a graduate student, and he got a degree, and then he transmogrified into a green card, even though he was associated. I don't know what he was still doing in his late 20s, 30 years old at Columbia, but he was the official in representative or communications director. He's the person Columbia talked to about Columbia University. Apartheid divest. If you look at that literature, what they have put out, they call. They praised Hamas. They. They said October 7th was justified by any means necessary. They had people in there that said they wanted to kill Israelis. They did all of that. They illegally broke into a hall at Columbia. He wasn't one of the people, but he defended it and he was their advocate. And at one time, they had suspended him. They issued a suspension order for a day, and then they got scared and withdrew it. So the point was, again, is he guilty of a felony? No. But the point is, you don't have to let him in. If you look at the statute passed in the 50s that Marco Rubio keeps quoting. It just says that anybody who is engaged in terrorist or promotes or engages in terrorist activity are other people who do. That's exactly what he does. He is promoting people who are advocating more of what happened on October 7th. So all Marco Rubio, as the Secretary of State is saying, I don't want to even talk about him. I'm just saying that I have the right to deport anybody under a statute who promotes or associates with people who promote terrorism. It's just an option. And I, if he had have just said, I'm mam who Khalil and I worked and he didn't. I worked for the United Nations Relief Organization, which was, we know, had Hamas people working for it and all. I worked in the Beirut embassy and I am coming here to the United States to study. But I also want to be engaged in pro Hamas demonstrations. They would have never issued him a visa. They wouldn't have said, well, we don't want to restrict your right of expression. They just said, we have an option. We don't have to let you in. We don't have to let you in at all. And they do that all the time. When I was in high school or college, almost every year there would be some 65 year old person. Sometimes they were citizens and news erupted that they were guards at Auschwitz or Belsen Belsen or they had been part of the SS in Ukraine. And they lied. They lied about the circumstances they got here. Some of them were not even on green cards. They had been natural. We deported them. We deported people in their 80s. And why? Because when they went to court and said, I didn't know, I just had to, I had no choice. I wasn't a criminal, I was just part of this government. We said, no, we have a choice. And if you had said what you did, we would not have let you in. And you lied about it. So you're out. So if we did that with naturalized citizens, we can, you know, I mean, it's just. So add it all up. You have this Carmelo Anthony and you have Mahmoud Khalil and then you've got Luigi Mangione and then you've got Mr. Garcia, Abrego Garcia. And what is the left doing? They're romanticizing each one of these people, but they're all unsavory characters, all of them. They haven't been adjudicated in the system of law yet. But they are not your poster children or poster boys or poster whatever people to advocate a anti Trump movement. I mean, it's not going to resonate with people. And then there's, finally, there's the flip side. They don't talk about the victim of Kamala Anthony. He was just 17. All he did was say, you're on the wrong side of this stadium and your team is on that side, and you were yelling or something, so please leave. And he didn't leave. And he got up and he said, please leave. You're disturbing it and you're in the wrong place. He brought a knife. But we don't care about the fate of that person. He's gone. And we don't care about all the people who were wiped out on October 7th, which started this whole Middle East. And Mr. Kahlil has advocated sympathy with these killers that what fried a baby, raped women, decapitated. We don't think about them. We don't think about the people that come over here illegally in gangs and drugs and the damage they do to people. And we don't think about the poor United Health Care executive who got his, you know, body blown apart by bullets from this coward who was a wealthy, wealthy person. And it's just really disturbing that these people on the left keep championing these people. And then when you say, victor, that's unfair. Well, then you look at the Rutgers poll and people who identify as left, 50% of them or over half, can defend the idea of killing Donald Trump. And you look at Mangione and some of these polls, and he's like 45, 55%. And that pathetic Taylor Lorenz went on Fox the other night with Hannity, and she, she tried to play this old wink and nod game where she said, he, you know, when she said he was handsome and he's dynamic and idealistic. What? And she said, I was just saying why? He attracts other people. And then he kept trying to press and said, is that what attracts you? Well, these United Health people were doing all these terrible things. So basically what she was implying, because she didn't want to be explicit, because she would have been thrown out of the segment advocating murder, but basically she was saying that anytime a person determines that an organization or its management is detrimental to the public good, you have a right to kill them. You have a right to kill them. And UnitedHealth, whatever you think about it, it provides health care for a lot of people. A lot of people would argue that it's been, I'm a United Health Care Coverage. When I have a sinus infection or I go for eye treatment, I get complete printout of what they paid and my premium and I have no complaints against them. I think somebody should do it and they do a good job. But she, these people, the left, I don't know whether they weren't educated or they're ignorant. They've completely lost their marbles. And the idea that Bernie Sanders and AOC and the squad are now the face of this party, whether it's, you know, they have no problem with destroying Teslas or terrorism with Teslas or any of this stuff. And it's going to escalate. It's going to escalate, unfortunately, until somebody gets up and said, Josh Shapiro did, but he only did when they attacked the governors. He wasn't loud at all about what they were doing to Jews on campus. He said some things, but not like he did. He didn't say he wasn't as animate when they tried to kill Trump twice. He wasn't animate about the Tesla firebombing, but now he is because he understands these people are anti Semitic, they're pro Palestinian, they're capable of anything. Why we want them here, I don't know. It's our choice to let people in. Why would you want people coming from this violent Middle east in Gaza that are completely nursed from day one to hate Jews and kill them in places like Gaza? I have nothing against Palestinians. Just say, you know what? For right now, until this problem is over and your education system is different, I don't think you should come to the United States. If you're Palestinian, you're Arab and you're an Israeli citizen, then come. We have no problem with that. But not this educational system where you're nursed on venom and toxic hatred and.
- [23:04]
Sammy Wink
A lot of lies as well. So, Victor, I would like to take a moment for our sponsor, Wired to Fish Coffee. As you may know, I love Wired to Fish coffee. Not only for their delicious smooth coffee, but more importantly for their amazing commitment to give back. Wired to fish coffee gives back 25% of profits. 25 to conservation, clean water and things like missions and evangelical outreach. Join us and enjoy the coffee. Enjoy your coffee while making a difference in the world and join a community of like minded coffee lovers. Subscribe and save today and enjoy discounted coffee and free freight or just give this great brand a try with discount code. Just news or just the news for 10% off your first order, head over to Wired Number 2 Fish Coffee today and make this year a year. You align your coffee with your values. And we like to thank Wired to Fish for sponsoring the Victor Davis Hansen show. So, Victor, let's turn to Donald Trump. And I have a little bit to read, so if you'll humor me for a second because, Donald, it's a Donald Trump tweet, so I'm sure you'll enjoy it. He is criticizing the Federal Reserve head Jerome Powell because he we all need interest rates to go down. But Jerome Powell is resisting it until he, according to him, until Trump clarifies his trade policies. But this is what Trump rights. And he's talking about the European Central bank here. The European Central bank is expected to cut interest rates for the seventh time and yet too late. Jerome Powell of the Fed, who is always too late and wrong, yesterday issued a report which was another and typical complete mess. Oil prices are down, groceries are down, and the USA is getting rich on tariffs. Too late should have lowered interest rates like the European Central bank long ago, but he should certainly lower them now. So I don't know if Donald Trump is going to achieve his ends by that kind of.
- [25:26]
Donald Trump
Probably not. But he has a point because the inflation rate came back in March and it was low. It was 2.4 annualized. That's pretty good. 2.6 maybe. And there was good job growth. Oil prices were down and consumer confidence or people are still not going crazy. But we're not in a recession. We're not in a hyperinflation. That's, that's the point that he's making. And these interest rates that are so high came late to Biden. They let him go for a long time. When we hit 9% annualized inflation in 2022, then they acted. And what Trump is getting at is the debt at 1.1, the annual deficit at point 1.9 adds to the debt. That's 37 trillion. And that has to be financed every day. And it's $3 billion. If you cut just if he was able to cut 20%, it would save hundreds of billions. I mean, you could save three or four hundred billion dollars excuse me, million dollars out of that three billion dollars a year. So that's what he's thinking. He said, we're cutting all this and we're doing all this, but we're paying $3 billion a day in interest. And this is crazy. The other thing about it, it's very unique, is if you collate everything in the Wall Street Journal what they say, I mean, it's all negative, 99% negative TRUMP Every single day. Karl Rove has another blistering column. The economists have blistering columns. Trump can do no good and I think, you know, I like the Wall Street Journal, but if I'm an irrelevant person in Selma, California, But I would make a polite suggestion. If they continue this negative drumbeat, 90% negative, they're going to go the way of national events. And somebody's going to say that's impossible because they're not really popular on the left. They would rather read the New York Times leftist. But half their readership, or maybe 55% supports what's going on. But if they completely don't have the opposite view, and they don't, then. And that was what. I watched it firsthand at the National Review. I would politely suggest to people, do you really believe that Hillary Clinton is better than the agenda of Donald Trump or Joe Biden will be better than Donald Trump's agenda? And why don't you just say 51% is good enough for me, even if you disagree with his antics or his tweets, what he's doing, closing the border, legal immigration, no wars abroad, deterrence, moving the embassy, Abraham Accord, all of that, why can't you just digest that and say on the ledger, in a Manichean world where you don't have to be perfect to be good, this agenda is preferable. And more importantly, on 85% of things that we used to before, we were getting under it, but they couldn't. And I would politely tell people, and they got very angry at me. But I would say, if you continue to do this, you're going to lose subscribers and then you're going to lose columnist and you're going, and that's what's going to happen to the Wall Street Journal if they continue to do it. They cannot say anything positive about what's going on. And there are positive things that are going on. But if you keep saying recession, recession, Jamon Dimon said recession today, the Wall Street Journal said, you know, majority of economists think recession, recession. Well, then why isn't Powell saying, oh, my God, all of the blue chip economists, the Wall Street Journal, they're predicting a recession. I've got to stop that. By lowering interest rates, you only raise interest rates or keep them high. If you're worried about Biden hyperinflation, but you don't have hyperinflation. Now, the second question is, is Trump smart doing this? Yes and no. Because if he now lowers interest rates, then everybody goes after Powell and says, you caved, you're supposed to be independent. But if he doesn't say anything, he thinks there's no downside in doing something, which I think is politicized. I think everybody does. So I think Trump's strategy is you say it now and then you shut up for a while and then you hope he waits a month. So nobody says he's reacting to the Trump criticism, but it's just my own feeling.
- [30:12]
Sammy Wink
Well, I think before we go to break and then to fascism in Europe in the 1930s, there was a little spat that occurred between Megyn Kelly, who said Kristi Noem should not be out there all the time showboating herself for PR for what's getting done by the Homeland Security and Gnome shot Back that she's or sorry, Gnome shot Back that she has a lot of things to do. So sometimes she's out there with all different 26 different divisions. I guess she feels like she has. So they are in a little bit of an argument. And Megyn Kelly says, I love everything she's doing, but she's trying to make a spectacle of herself theater of what's going on.
- [31:04]
Donald Trump
I'm a little prejudiced because I go on Megan's once a month. And there's another backstory to that. Long time ago, that was the only person I was on Fox occasionally until I was I had a little some people called me up and said, you wrote something that we don't like and you're never going to be on Fox again. That was the Ailes regime, whom I liked a lot. I had a son, Jack, Wonderful. I met Love his wife. But they maybe they had legitimate. I had written a column critical of a Bill O'Reilly, and I like Bill O'Reilly. I like him a lot. And I like Roger Ailes. But they felt that I had been unfair. And Mr. Ailes said I shouldn't expect to get back on. And I wasn't. But I had been on Megan. And then when she left, Laura brought me on. I owe a lot to Laura and Tucker. I like both of them. So I'm kind of prejudiced here about Megan. But her point really wasn't that critical because I went back and looked at what she said. She likes the idea that if you're going to intercept by sea drug smuggling, you're driving the boat. If you're trying to tell people about what the problem is in El Salvador, you actually go down there, or if you want to look at the fence, you have firsthand knowledge. So that was all right. She was absolutely right. You just don't. Mallorcas never did any of that. But her point was, as I understand it, you don't wear a $60,000 if that's true. Rolex, you don't wear hair extensions. You don't wear tight fitting outfits, especially if you're a grandmother. And as Kristi Nomas has reminded me, I'm a grandmother. I have married, I have kids. So what she is saying, when you go out there, just wear a baggy camouflage jacket and work boots and tie your hair back with a baseball cap and nobody will stare at you. And you don't need to look glamorous. You don't need makeup, you don't need, I think she said fake eyelashes.
- [33:07]
Sammy Wink
She was really against the glam factor and nothing else.
- [33:11]
Donald Trump
She was very honest. She said, look at me right now. I, I dress like that. I have a, you know, I'm, but I'm in a TV show. But when I go out, I, you know, Laura Ingram does that a lot. She goes out on location. Remember, she's done actually kickboxing or. But she doesn't do, she doesn't make herself up like that. She, she just wears clothes that are characteristics of the people that she's with. And when she goes to the border. So she's right. Megan is right. And I don't know why Christy, I.
- [33:42]
Sammy Wink
Mean, she's a grandma having a renaissance. Give her some slack.
- [33:48]
Donald Trump
She's a very attractive woman and, and she is. Feels she'll be even more attractive and get attention because she's so unusually attractive for someone that age. And that's a, that's a narcotic. But I think Megan's criticism was constructive. She's saying that the left is going after you all the time. They call it, what do they call her, Ice Barbie or something.
- [34:17]
Sammy Wink
Yeah, I think that was, yeah.
- [34:19]
Donald Trump
So just protect yourself and protect the agency by looking like the guys you're with, with no makeup, just. And I think because she is a naturally attractive person. So if she didn't wear any makeup or fake eyelashes or Rolex watches, she just had a baggy T shirt and baggy pants. She'd actually look more attractive and people wouldn't resent that. I think Megan was saying people were starting to. That was in the leftist press too.
- [34:50]
Quince Advertisement
All right, Victor, let's go ahead and.
- [34:51]
Sammy Wink
Take a break and then we'll come back to talk about fascism in Europe in the 1930s. Stay with us and we'll be right back. Welcome back to the Victor Davis Hansen show for everybody who's new. Victor is the Mark Neely Anderson Senior Fellow in Military History and Classics at the Hoover Institution and the Wayne Marshabowsky Distinguished Fellow in History at Hillsdale College. You can find him at his X account. His, his handle is at VD Hansen and you can find him on Facebook at Hanson's Morning Cup. So please come join us there. Victor. So we've been hearing so much as you've term it fascist porn or fascism porn from the left about Donald Trump. So this is an exciting thing. I would like to hear about real fascists and what they do. So take it away.
- [35:45]
Donald Trump
Yeah, real fascists. I was just as an experiment about five minutes ago, I said fascism 1930s and Wikipedia came up. I didn't want to read it. I'm not a fan of Wikipedia, but I could see skimming a little bit. And then the BBC came up, which two pictures on an article of fascism in the 1930s you think they had on there? Donald Trump. Yes, Donald Trump. And they always do this. People say, they say that he is. They had Le pen too, but modern fascism, it comes from this Latin word, fasces. And those were the rods that Roman tribunes or legates carried as a sign of their authority. And they were bound. So the idea is that the fascist party originated in the 1920s in Italy under Mussolini. Mussolini was a communist socialist. He was actually wounded in World War. He was sick and wounded on the Austrian front and the Alps. And that was another characteristic of all of these people. They were military people. Franco came to power in 36 during the Spanish Revolution and he had been not the top ranking. There were two or three officers ahead of him that were engineering and they all mysteriously died. He was accused of in plane crash. He didn't have anything to do with it, but that was one of the accusations. But he had been a very effective military officer in Spanish Morocco. And Mussolini had actually been a low ranking, but actually very brave on the. And Hitler was kind of exact, but he was a messenger on the front lines and he was gassed for a while. And there were people in Japan that had been in the Manchurian front. So they came out of the military. And why did they gain power? They gained power for a number of reasons. One was after the Great World War I and the Great Depression, it was a one, two punch in Europe. And the problem with the World War I wasn't that it was, it was barbaric and it was horrific, but it wasn't nearly as horrific as World War II. And World War II didn't lead to fascism. Fascism died mostly with World War II. And the reason was there was not an unconditional surrender. There wasn't a clear verdict. So the defeated powers and the victorious powers had complaints that no one had won or lost. So the French General Foch said, this is only a 20 year repeat. The Italians said, we fought for the Allies against the Austrians and we lost 500,000 dead. And we didn't even get territorial acquisitions that were in dispute to all these areas. And the British said, we lost all of these men over there. And France is socialist. And so Oswald Mosley. And there was a fascist movement in Britain that was restrained because British, Britain and France had far stronger constitutional reputations, dependability, transparency than these other countries did. But there was a Japanese coup that got rid of the Japanese constitutional government and in the 30s, late 20s and 30s, took over. Okay, so they were reacting. The army said that in the conundrum of World War I, they made the argument in a national sense. Italy didn't get what it should have got. Germany, we were treated unfairly by the Versailles Treaty. Japan, we helped patrol the Mediterranean for the Allies, and yet they didn't give us any of the spoils. We didn't get the Mariana Islands, we didn't get any of the Bismarck. They didn't get any of this. They said. And then in Spain it was the communists and socialists are taking over during the Depression. So there was the second thing, the Depression. And in all of these countries there was a socialist communist reaction, basically parallel to it. The funny thing was that National Socialism was socialist and there were elements. Mussolini was a socialist, his fascist party. When I say socialist, there were crony capitalism, they controlled the private sector, they had government ownership of the utilities, they had very generous social welfare programs, and they were nationalists. But the one, two punch that fueled them was the anger over Versailles. Either they felt treated too harshly or they didn't get enough out of the war for given the sacrifices. And then the Depression hit. And one of the strange things about it, classical economics, when the Depression hit, did not react. And so the in the United States, Hoover actually raised taxes to try to balance the budget. And the point I'm making is he did not expand the money supply when people were hoarding. So when you have a depression, everybody says, I've got $150 in gold coins or silver, or I'm going to put them under my mattress and it doesn't circulate. And then prices are affected, jobs are affected, people can't borrow. There's people who don't go to a bank, so the banks don't have any money, so they can't lend money and they fail. Okay, so the classical Keynesian nostrum is for a temporary period to expand the money plot. George Bush did it in two, Donald Trump did it in 2020 and that was supposed to be a temporary deficit. Of course, their successors just said, well, if the Republicans did it, if Bush did it, I'm Obama, there's, I'm not going to be like Clinton and try to sacrifice. I'm just going to spend more than Bush did because he did it and he's a Republican. And then Biden said, well, Trump ran a deficit. Yeah, but it was right during the height of COVID and Biden. Bush was trying to save the financial system, but in the democracies they didn't do that. And so in the fascist countries they started rearming early and public works, the autobahns and the Italian train system. And what happened was people in New York and the salons and Paris, they said, wow, they have something, they're patriotic, they're trying to except for Hitler, they're trying to bring back traditional religion, they're fighting communism and they're building up militaries. And they survived the depression better than France or Britain, but especially better than the United States because we had tight money. And then really if you look at what Roosevelt did, he over regulated and he brought in all these high taxes and he did not let people naturally rebound from it. So we did a whole from Hoover to Roosevelt that it was probably about a 12 year period. So by 1938 we had 20%, 19% unemployment still in the second recession, our second depression, and only the wild spending of World War II got us out of it. So my point is that fascism got a good reputation among the populace because they survived the depression better than the alternative. And they addressed the anger in Italy and Germany and Spain and Japan over the First World War. And then third, you could make the argument that there was not an existing confidence in the republican system of government. France had been a republic much sooner than Germany had and the Weimar Republic was a joke. And Japan had really had dabbled with constitutional government, but it was new in the 20s and the same thing in the Spanish Republic. Whereas the United States and Britain and France had a much stronger and longer going back to the 18th century. And in Britain, parliamentary constitutional government was even earlier. So they were able to withstand much better these fascist movements that said we can restore the economy more quickly, we will bring back national dignity, we will stamp out communism, we'll bring back traditional religion, we will stop the sex and wildness of a Weimar type of lifestyle. And that's why they got into power and Once they got into power. 22 in Italy, Spain, 36, 33, basically 33. Hitler was in power by 33, 34 and the Japanese were in power by the mid-30s. The militarists then they just started to liquidate people. And Mussolini was the most successful in hiding the black shirts that went around, beat up and even killed people. But Franco and the nationals got rid of a lot of people. He was in power for 36 years. Most of these fascist movements disappeared after World War II because they were on the losing side. But Franco was very smart and what he did during World War II. Hitler came to him in 1940 after France had fallen. And he said to him, there's only Britain, Russia is our partner. The United States is isolationist. You're missing out, General Franco. And we can take Gibraltar. If we take Gibraltar, we'll control the entire Mediterranean. We'll put a sub base there, a naval base, the Italian navy, and we won't let anybody in. And Britain will be cut off from easy access to the Suez Canal. And we have most of the. If you look at the periphery of the Mediterranean, Greece was occupied, Italy was a fascist country, France was occupied, Spain was pro fascist. You go on the other side of the Mediterranean, it was all the way to Egypt, either occupied by the Vichy French or the Italians in Libya. Only a little bit from Tobruk to Suez was British. And you look at the Middle east, it was mostly probably Nazi, where Palestine is today, for example. So there was a British presence in Iraq, but the Vichy's controlled Syria and Lebanon. But my point is this. Then they went to Franco in 1940 and Hitler said, we want you to allow us to go in and attack Gibraltar from the land. There's no way. Nobody's ever taken Gibraltar except the British from sea. And they did that centuries ago. But we will have a combined Italian navy from sea and you can join us. And Franco said, what do I get out of it? And they said, what do you want? And he said, well, there is no more France, there's Vichy France and so we want Spanish Morocco and Algeria. And Hitler said they negotiated for nine hours. He said he'd rather have a root canal than talk to Franco again. It was the worst time of his life. And Franco basically said, we lost a million people in the civil war, our country is devastated. And for us to get into a world war against the democracies where there was only one democracy, we want all this territory. And Hitler basically said to him, I've only got about 80,000 people in France. I Don't need any more because of the Vichy's they are keeping a tab on things. If I go in there and steal all of Vichy France's imperial holdings in North Africa and Algeria and Morocco and give it to you, the Vichys may defect and then I'll have a hostile Vichy and I've got to put a half a million men in. So they never cut a deal. And the reason after that Franco said, well I'll tell you what I'll do. We'll sell you titanium and we'll pay the transportation. So they did. And then about 1944, Franco looked around, he thought they're going to lose. And just like the Swedes, the Swedes said, well we'll send you iron ore and we'll send, but you pay for no more credit. You pay in gold and you have to pay transportation. And that happened for about six months. And then as the year ended the suite said no, no, no, no, no, you're going to lose. And they cut Hitler off. That's in his private papers and table talk he was really angry about of course. And then the Spanish cut him off and then they made feelers to the Americans and the British. And so when the war ended, Franco had transmogrified from a pro Nazi fascist into an anti communist. At the very moment the Soviet Union went back to its original nature, it was gobbling up Eastern Europe. And Churchill, well, Churchill was out of power. But a series of British prime ministers and a series of American presidents, Truman, they looked at everything and they said to themselves, we can't fight the Soviets in Eastern Europe if we've got a hostile power in Spain and Portugal, Salazar and Franco. So we won't put them in NATO quite yet, but we're going to let them be because they'll put a lid on communism. So we don't want a communist, we don't want them hostile to us and we don't want them overthrown or we'll have commies at our rear and Commies at our front. So we cut a bad deal better than the alternative, I suppose. For 36 years you had fascism in Portugal and Spain and to a lesser degree at times in Greece and we supported that as bulwarks against communism. They all said that this would never change. But as soon as the Cold War started to peter out, then these countries reasserted themselves. In Greece by 1970 and in Spain and Portugal roughly in the 70s they got back to constitutional government. So the depression and World War I and the lack of constitutional strength and legacies in these four countries explain the rise of fascism. So this was, that was the big deal in the late 20s and middle 20s and 30s. We're talking about great events. We started with the Russo Japanese War, Panama Canal and we're going each week, I think we've done 10 of these now. And so we're going to talk about why World War II broke out on the eve of it next time.
- [51:30]
Sammy Wink
So I would like to ask a question. Given our current left rhetoric about Donald Trump as a fascist and democracy is in danger, do you have any commentary on how these fascist governments gained that kind of power before? Obviously before they became fascist governments. Like for example, how does Hitler come to power? How does Mussolini get that kind of consolidation?
- [51:58]
Donald Trump
There's the grand strategy that made them popular. They were very popular. And then there is the dark side, the actual machinations, mechanics, modalities that eliminated the opposition and the constitution and they're all a little bit different. But in the case of Hitler, Hindenburg ran as Chancellor. He was in his mid-80s. So when he died, Hitler was made from Vice Chancellor to Chancellor. And then incrementally he began to cancel freedom of expression, the jurisprudence under the prior Weimar. And he began the night of the Long Lives. He wiped out all of the brownshirt rivals to the SS and they started wiping out people. And that was when Dachau opened up. It wasn't a death camp at that time. It really was more of a prisoner of war camp, although they had ovens and gas. So they started sending people there and he was very careful to keep that quiet. And when they started before World War II, murdering people who were mentally problematic or disabled, they didn't tell anybody that got out. And when they got out, they stopped. Then they went after the church, Lutheran and Catholic church, but they were very incremental. And so what they were doing is the whole time they were doing this, they were saying, have you ever seen a chancery like this? Have you ever seen trains like this? Have you ever seen an autobahn like this? Have you ever seen paid vacations like this? Have you ever seen nature walks through the Black Forest? They were environmentalists. And the same thing in Italy. Italy was a mess after World War I. So Mussolini, you know, that was the thing. At least in the 70s we had a lot. My parents had a lot of Italian friends. There was a very well known judge and his father, Judge was about 50, his father was about 80 and he would come to our house for Christmas and I was like a smart alec, big mouth high school kid. In world history. And I said, what did you think of that awful Mussolini? Well, Victor, he made the trains. Have you ever sat in Naples for two hours when once a Mussolini. All I know is that the train, it was perfect. Perfecto. It just ran. And the buildings, they were beautiful. And I was. And he said they were excavating. They were excavating the archaeology, the university he was spending. They were picking up the trash in Naples. And that was what he was saying still. So that was. It was two pronged. Eliminate the opposition and keep it quiet. And just say, I don't know what the Brown shirts or the black shirts are doing. They're beating up Crystal Nye. They're doing this and buying them off, buying all the industrials off, buying the generals off. Hitler was really brilliant. You look at every one of those. Von, von Manstein, von Kleist, whatever they were. They got big estates in Pomerania and East Prussia, even Guderian. I mean, he was. When they kicked him out and they were afraid that he was going to mouth off to the other generals, they gave him a big estate in what is now Poland and parts of Belarus. So they bought people off, they liquidated them. And then they had this nationalist that. We have restored your pride after World War I. We've restored the economy after World War. And because they were socialists, it was very hard to say they were far right because they were national Socialists. So they were. They had all of these social welfare programs and they were pretty much more generous than the democracies, but they were running up huge debt. People have argued that if Hitler had not gone into World War II and that if he had just stayed peacefully, he wasn't able to sustain that level of rearmament. And he was very proud, I mean, of all the leaders of the opposition. I shouldn't say opposition. Of all of his enemies, Churchill, Roosevelt, Truman or Stalin, he admired Stalin the most. And he said, if I had won World War II, I would have got rid of Churchill and Roosevelt, but I would have put Stalin in a nice place and let him do what he wants. Because I really admire all the people he killed and his ironclad rule over the economy. And he was my type of leader. He was a communist.
- [56:54]
Sammy Wink
Yeah. Given all that, then what do you think of this current bantering around of this person? And that person is a fascist in our current culture? Because you've said things that I could draw parallels with things the Democrats have been doing. That is lawfare. The population popularity of Trump is. Could be compared to the popularity of a Hitler, a Mussolini. But is there. What do you make of the rhetoric or what's your commentary on this current rhetoric?
- [57:27]
Donald Trump
Anytime you have an argument the reductio ad Hitlerum, you start mentioning Hitler. Just give it up. Because Hitler, sui generis, he killed 6 million in death camps. He caused a war that cost 65 million. So when I say fascism, then I would look for telltale traits. Number one, do they increase the military and are they aggrandizing? Are they using it to preempt or optional wars? Donald Trump doesn't want a war. He just told the Israelis he didn't want to bomb Iran preemptively. People say, well, he's going to evade. No, he wasn't. That was art of the deal. And the result of it is blackrock has a good chance of buying the entry and the exit to the Panama Canal and the Panamanians will be closer than they ever are. He's not going to invade Panama, he's just telling to get the Chinese out. And the same thing with Greenland. It's got an extra billion and a half dollars from Denmark. It's had an election, it's autonomous. We have a base there. And it was just somebody do something because the Chinese and the Russian are. I'm going to do that kind of talk. And he's not going to make Canada 51st state anything. He's trying to tell them that you can't continue to run 65 to $100 billion in trade surpluses with us while you spend 1.3 something on defense and we defend you, it's an insult to us. You're our close friend, you can argue with that. But. So he doesn't fit the idea of a fascist. And then is he internally going after people? That's an interesting question because does anybody listening believe if Donald Trump had said, I'm not going to run for 2024, I'm done, I am not running. Or if he had not been in the Republican primary, does anybody believe that Fanny Willis, Alvin Bragg, Letita James or Jack Smith would have either gone after anybody or even the Republic? No. All of those charges were cooked up. Does anybody believe if Donald Trump was not running, that Christopher Steele would have been hired as an informant by the FBI? Would that dossier or Hillary would have been paying him through three secret paywalls? And we're now going to see new information from the Struck Lisa Page corpus of text that's going to show you how the FBI was involved in trying. You think the FBI would be working with Facebook and Twitter to suppress knowledge of the laptop. And so they have waged an extralegal war against Trump. So then the question rises, what if you're Trump people, you'd go tit for tat to stop it. Or if you do that, will it. Will the next one, the next one will just be endless? Or do you just let them go and say, you know what, that was an aberration. We'll just stop it. And you have to find some medium. And so if there is actual wrongdoing. So Letita James. Well, it's pretty. I was kind of disappointed by a Fox commentator said, well, they must have been really looking at her because some of this stuff is 20 years old. Yeah, maybe. But 20, 23, she was the Attorney General of New York. She's supposed to have lived in New York for five years. She listed her principal residence elsewhere in a different state. She also listed her father as her spouse. So she committed the same type of fraud that she accused Trump of. So you want to make an example of her and then you can say, let a court and jury decide. And this is hubris, isn't it? And if he was really wanting to be tit for tat, he would move to have a prosecutor do it in South Carolina, just like she chose New York. And I doubt you that. I doubt a South Carolina jury would be very sympathetic to her. And the same thing with Jack Smith. He was holier than thou. But if he doesn't want to report on the IRS, 180,000 in free legal services, maybe you can you not investigate it. And Fanny Willis, that's not. Trump's not involved with those investigations. That's Georgia state oversight. And then you look at Stacey Abrams, who was so loud, and now all of a sudden she's worth several million dollars. She had over a billion and a half dollars in funding from the Biden administration for PACs, for nonpartisan NGOs, and she skimmed off the top. She's got a big beautiful home. She, she was flat broke. So if all of these are local investigations, fine. There might be some federal ones. But when they say that Trump is a fascist and he's going and manipulating the law, so far it's been all one way. It has been all one way. You think that Joe Biden, that Hunter Biden, he never, he didn't pay income tax on $4 million. He hasn't. Today, the Biden family got about $31 million over the life of his vice presidency and senatorial career. I don't think they've ever paid much tax on that so the law has been manipulated and now it's up to the Trump administration to selectively, if it comes in the federal domain, Pam Bondi, if she gets criminal referrals, there's clear evidence and yes, prosecute them to the full, full extent. But I don't think you should go pull up Adam Schiff's dossier. Even though he lied, probably lied under oath and he was censored by the House. I don't think you should pull up the dossier of Nancy Pelosi and ask how she, he and her husband, while she was in Congress became worth $250 million on stock deal. You just. I'm sure there was improper somewhere there, but you don't want to do that. I don't think he's done that. Trump talks louder than he actually acts and that's part of the art of the deal to intimidate people. But that's what fascism does. It uses the mechanism of government to destroy enemies in an anti constitutional. It's kind of like what Biden did. And then second of all, it has a nationalistic, aggressive foreign policy that starts wars, invades countries. And Mussolini did, they went into East Africa and Japanese went into Manchuria and Hitler went into the Saarland. He militarized orhineland. He went into the Anschluss in Austria well before World War II. And Franco was part of the nationalist movement to create a greater Spanish empire in North Africa before, before the Spanish Civil War. That's what they do. He hasn't done that. He's been accused of it. When they say he's a Nazi fascist, I just, I just want to know what he's doing. Another thing they do is they have a propaganda arm and so, and they hide things. So I wish everybody would listen who Biden. Our Trump is more transparent talk has more press conferences, more private interviews with hostile audiences, televises his cabinet meetings, answers questions. Anybody comes up our Biden and which, which presidency has a cabal around him and not telling the people who's actually in control. Does anybody think that Donald Trump is as demented as Joe Biden and they're hiding him around? He wouldn't even allow that. He has a confidence. He just. Maybe if you don't like him, you can say he's egocentric or narcissistic, but he likes to be out there and bandy about with the reporter. Hitler didn't do that, Mussolini didn't do that. He was a journalist, he didn't do that. So it doesn't fit any of the cat they call George Bush. I mean, John Glenn said that it was the old Nazi thing about Bush. Merkel said that he was acting like a Nazi. Al Gore called him a digital brown shirt. I think Garrison Keillor called him that. He wasn't. George Bush was. No, he was a good person. He didn't use, he didn't weaponize the government about anybody. But that's what they do. What the left always does is this. Whatever Republican president is in power, whether it's Ronald Reagan, George H.W. bush, George W. Bush, Donald Trump, Donald Trump 2.0, they call them a Nazi when they're in office, and then when they're out of office, they call them a Nazi. If there's a Democratic successor during the Clinton and Obama years, however, when George Bush, if they are succeeded by a Republican like George H.W. bush, then they call Reagan a Nazi. I mean, excuse me, they call George H.W. bush. And they said Reagan was not that bad. He was kind of a nice guy compared to George H.W. and then when George H.W. was president, they called, and then when he was out of office, they didn't say anything about him. And then when George W. Bush came in, they said if he just could be the gentleman that his father was. His father reached a cross. He said there had to be a hundred points of light. He said, he's going once a kinder. He didn't have this Texas draw. He was an awful guy. He's a Nazi fascist. And then when he went out of office, he faded away. During the. Obama, when Trump came in, well, why couldn't he be like Cheney and, and Bush? They, they saw the dangers and they, they're, they're, they don't like Trump and they weren't, weren't that bad. And that's what they always do. I don't think they'll do it with Trump. I think they'll hate him forever because he was a counter revolutionary, much more so than Reagan. And he's somebody. Either Trump or his advisors said it doesn't do any good just to fight the left on a political front, because the country for the last 50 years has gone hard left. The government's got bigger, the debt has got bigger, the borders have been more porous, were weaker abroad. The economy has got unsustainable fault lines, and the general culture has gone to proverbial hell, you know, nuclear fountain. So what they said is, we can either just do the political timidity or we can just wage war on the universities. What they've done to the country. We can do wage wars on the huge government. I don't mean wars in a nasty sense, reform. We can institute reform on foreign policy, on visas. And that's what they're doing. And I've never seen a Republican administration dare do that.
- [68:34]
Sammy Wink
Well, Victor, we better get back to our news for the day. So let's take a break and come back and we'll talk a little bit more about news stories. And Harvard is looking at potentially being its tax exempt status taken away from it. So stay with us and we'll be right back. Welcome back to the Victor Davis Hansen Show. Victor's website is victorhansen.com the name of it is the Blade of Perseus. And you can come join us there for all the free stuff. It's, it's got loads of Victor's work, his articles from American Greatness and other outlets that publish him. And he's got all of his books there. And you can join for $6.50 a month or $65 a year as an Ultra subscriber and get two articles on current events and a podcast.
- [69:38]
Donald Trump
I have a cast for you, Sammy.
- [69:39]
Sammy Wink
Yes.
- [69:40]
Donald Trump
So in my 50 years of writing in obscurity, I've noticed now something's happening. I've seen things that I don't even know I wrote and interviews I don't even know I gave from years ago. And people are going on the Internet and getting an interview I did like six years ago or 10 years, and they're chopping it up and then they're illustrating it under their name and they're producing it or articles that I wrote. Suddenly you can get an ebook. Even my institution, the Hoover. And somebody everybody calls me and said, you wrote a book on populism. I didn't know it. I said, I didn't know it either. And they said, you wrote one on socialism. I said, no, I didn't. They said, yes, you did. And there's ads. And so I don't know, but I don't know what's going on. It's really weird that people call me and say, you did this, you did that. I said, no, I didn't.
- [70:42]
Sammy Wink
Cyberspace is an insidious thing, and AI is making it that much.
- [70:46]
Donald Trump
The only thing about it is somebody wrote me about a week ago, somebody dug up a talk I gave at UC Berkeley right before I went to Libya. That's when I had a ruptured appendix. I had a I was really in pain that day. But it was in 2006. I had hair. I lost all my hair within three months in 2013. 14. When my daughter died, I was really stressed out. And I know that people say that's impossible. It was thinning, but I just remember combing it and big gobs would come out for that year. But my point is that I gave an interview, and the only thing is the guy said, well, why do you look so bad? I just saw an interview you did at Berkeley. So I wanted to write him back. I don't write back. That was. Hey, that was almost 20 years ago. I was 52. Come on, 53. Give me a break.
- [71:45]
Sammy Wink
Oh, no. Well, Victor, let's talk a little bit about Harvard. Apparently, Trump is proposing that their tax exempt status be taken away from them because they are violating the law and exercising discrimination. And so he's going that far.
- [72:01]
Donald Trump
Now, I know this sounds stereotypical, but there are two issues here. There's the immediate and the long term. Harvard has $53 million endowment. They have a great investment team because they're getting almost 10% for almost 5 billion a year. And they get $2.2 billion from the federal government, I think up to 9 billion in auxiliary grants to Harvard affiliated institutions, hospitals. Some of it's good because it's health care, Boston General Hospital or women, but that's a good investment. But my point is this. Donald Trump has a task force. It's not Trump. It's an anti Semitism task force. And they're looking at about 70 universities where they saw during the Biden Jews that were harassed, roughed up, trapped in libraries, called we want to kill you anti Israel things, where they praised, you know, October 7th, and they were not given the types of protection that other groups were. I know that Barack Obama said that shouldn't. He's ham handed. But as I said on earlier podcasts, if African American students at Harvard were in a class listening to a black studies professor and a bunch of, let's say white people came in with scarves over their face or hoodies, and they started screaming and yelling to break up that and say, you're anti American or you're doing all this and they roughed up. Obama would not say what he's doing. He would say, the federal government has got to do this. So this task force is saying these people should not be wearing masks. It's giving them an amenity to do this stuff. They can't be the. And they get a whole range. And all Trump said is, you go, you want the money, then you comply. And they said, this is against freedom of expression. Well, there's a couple of things there. They didn't say you can't do it. They just said you can't do it on the public's dime. And if you don't, if you want to keep letting Middle East. If you want to have Middle east students run, you know, wild and, you know, go to rallies and push a Jewish guy and try to surround him, I guess that's okay if you want to do that, but you're not going to do it on our money. And they added a little insult to injury. You know, it's basically. And you are discriminating. We know you're still doing it. We know that SAT scores and GPAs and everything of people who are Asian and white have to be higher than people that are not. And the Supreme Court, you got sued Harvard, and you lost. And you are not following the court in its entirety. And they also, you know, they're all spokespeople. And you lost $150 million in your donors because they see what you're doing, Everybody sees what you're doing remedial. So Harvard then says, this is a matter of free speech. Everybody says, issue number two, why are we giving any money? What if you were just perfect, why would we give you any money? We've got a lot of universities that we have University of Nebraska, that's a public university. Maybe we should help the state of Nebraska. Maybe we should help the state of Kansas. Maybe we should help University of Georgia. Maybe the UC campus needs help. But these are public institutions. You're not. You're private. So when maybe we can say we'll help private institutions if they have less than $2 billion endowment. But why Stanford 30 billion endowment? Why you 53? Why do you need our help? And that's the issue. And so then the third thing is people said, I wrote a column today, well, maybe you should just go full Hillsdale. Hillsdale said under its former president, George Roche. And then Larry Arndt emphasized and fortified that idea. We don't take any more money. So if we don't take any money, we don't want you to come on our campus and say that beautiful stairway has to have a certain type of disability access. We can take care of disability, but don't tell us to do this. Or you have to have X percentage proportional representation of this type minority. And they said, you can't do that. And they went to court and they've won. And they've been finally, they got so angry, the Obama minute, they tried to say, if you have and they were successful. If you have a VA scholarship or you're in the military and you want to go to Hillsdale, you can't use that federal funds, even at Hillsdale, because they refused to take them. And that's. And Hillsdale argued, well, that comes with a student, not us. He said no. And as I said earlier, when Obama was making lists for federal guidelines of where you should go to school, what's the gpa, what's the admissions, what's the job outlook, how many of their. They just left Grover City and Christian schools and Hillsdale off. They were so petty. The other thing is when Harvard says, well, you can't intervene because you disagree with our admissions. They did in 1970. They went after Bob Jones University. They had a statute that said, we don't encourage white people and non white people to date or marry. And the federal government said, no, no, no, no, no, no, you cannot discriminate. And they sued them. And Bob. And so that's on. That's a statute and that's a court case. And so that's what they're doing. Only they dress it up not in illiberality, which it was with Bob Jones. They dress it up in, you know, diversity, equity and equity. But it isn't. It's illiberal. So there's a lot of precedent that Harvard can't take federal money without federal guidelines. There's one final issue, and that is Hillsdale is. And I'm prejudiced because for 20 years I visit there and teach. But Hillsdale is principled. Harvard is not. If the Bush administration or the Trump administration said, you know what, we really like you, so we want to help you with federal funding, they wouldn't take it because they would say, we don't trust the federal government. Sorry, we like you guys, but we don't trust you because the federal government doesn't follow the Constitution. It's on the side of racial and gender discrimination. So we just want to follow, follow the Constitution as we feel best. And we can't do it given the nature of the federal government's power. But Harvard's different. It's not principle. It's saying, the Trump administration cannot tell a private institution how to run its campus. But it never said to earlier administrations they can't tell Bob Jones College how to run its campus. They agreed with that. And when they went out to harass, and they do harass Hillsdale all the time, Harvard never said, quit harassing Hillsdale. You can't interfere with them. And Hills. And think about it. Hillsdale didn't take any money. Harvard saying, you can't interfere with us. Why we take money. Hillsdale said, I don't take any money. And still when the federal government went after Hillsdale, Harvard, Harvard didn't say a word. They liked that. In other words, Harvard likes an activist Obama or Biden government to go into universities and say, what's that lgbtq? Do you have transgender? Do you have to let transgender people play under title nine? You have, oh, I don't see as many African Americans as demographically or repertory is necessary. That's what they do and Harvard loves that. But they don't like it when other people do it. And they're not willing to just say screw. Excuse me, screw you. We have $53 billion, we have $5 billion in annual income. We'll tighten our belts. We don't trust the Trump administration, we don't trust the Biden administrator. We don't trust any of you. We're Harvard. They won't even do that. Little Hillsdale with 1 billion endowment will do that. So they're despicable. And when people look at this, they think they're going to win, that they're poor little. No, they're an elitist, rich establishmentarian group. So is Yale, so is Stanford. And when the universities, these private, multi billion, this isn't 1960. When they have a few million dollars in their endowment. When the public learns that these universities have all this money and they're getting all this overhead surcharges 50, 60% on individual grants from NIH or Department of Energy or whatever and they see all that, they're not going to be sympathetic. So Harvard, if I was Harvard, I would cut a deal as quickly as possible. And then I would sugarcoat it and say we like the recommendations because we don't allow antisemitism. And I would do this, I'd say, wow, I don't want these crazy people with masks. It's kind of like the Ku Klux Klan and they're going getting out of hand. So I'll just say Trump made us do it. You can't wear a mask. You know, you could hide behind Trump, but instead if you fight that and you say that you're you, you have a God given right to get $2 billion a year when you're already getting 5 billion off your endowment. It's a losing argument. And I think if they keep pushing it and these kids keep storming halls and going after Jewish students and 500 Harvard students shutting down streets and disrupting and then they said this is. We've addressed that. No, they just went into the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. They just went into Princeton and Natalie Bennett, the former Prime Minister, they tried to shout him down. They're still doing it. If they keep doing that, they're going to lose, lose, lose.
- [82:46]
Sammy Wink
Yeah, let's hope so. Trump, more power to you. Keep at him. So, Victor, I have a comment by a reader of your website. Yes. On your. I think it was like 25 ideas. I. I'd have to go way back up to get the title of the article, but 25. No, but he has a series of questions and we can stop whenever you want to. That are a little challenging.
- [83:14]
Donald Trump
They are. Just do the question. I'll answer brief.
- [83:16]
Sammy Wink
We'll do it that way.
- [83:17]
Donald Trump
Are they criticism? You sound like.
- [83:19]
Sammy Wink
Yeah, he's. He's a little bit critical, but I thought the answers to these would be interesting for our audience.
- [83:24]
Donald Trump
Let's see if I can. This will be like a game show.
- [83:26]
Sammy Wink
Yes, Perfect.
- [83:28]
Donald Trump
I haven't seen him in a. Just. Okay.
- [83:30]
Sammy Wink
So Prelude. Yeah. That he gives. This is from Jaros. Jaroslaw Marty N. And he says, dear Professor, I respect you as a historian, but an economist you are not. Your seeming support for Trump's tariffs has been thoroughly refuted by the folks at the Wall Street Journal.
- [83:53]
Donald Trump
So that's a throw in that lightning answer. I never said I was an economist. I said that I had enormous respect for Milton Friedman and other economists. But I don't believe that you. And I've been criticized by economists where I work. Stay in your lane. But I'll give you an example very quickly. I'm a classicist. I wrote the introduction to landmark Thucydides. I've written esoteric articles that nobody reads on the language of Thucydides, even how he used to use numerals in Greek. Okay. When Graham Allison wrote the Thucydides Trap about, he took the corpus of Thucydides and he said that the ascending power makes the established power fearful and that causes war. So Athens was ascending, so Sparta preempted. He doesn't know Greek. He doesn't know there were existing fault lines. Ionic, Doric, a whole history of prior first Peloponnesian War. Apparently, he doesn't know one was cosmopolitan, one was rural, one had chattel slavery, one had helot serfdom, one was in land power, one was. I mean, there were a lot of reasons to go to war without ascending, but do you think I would ever criticize. I thought it was an interesting theory. And I never said. I never wrote anything and said, stay in your lane. You're writing about Thucydides. So I don't like that argument.
- [85:21]
Sammy Wink
No, it's not. All right, so that was just his prelude. So let's get to his questions. Number one, does it, because this is on the tariffs, Trump's tariffs, does it make sense to remedy a $1 trillion trade deficit by obliterating 10 trillion in stock market value?
- [85:40]
Donald Trump
Well, if he's frozen in time, so what he's doing, he's taking the lowest point of the stock market and saying 10 trillion. It's already starting to recover some of its value. And so, yes, at this point, point we've lost. At one point we lost, but it's already going back up and we don't know what will be the effect. Does he really think, in six months, if Trump is successful and he gets 7 to 10 trillion dollars in foreign investment and he cuts deals with all these countries and he reduces the trade deficit from 1.1 trillion down to, say, 400 billion, does he think the stock market's not going to react, given that he's going to pass a big tax cut, deregulation, oil develop. So that's a lame. He's just taking one little glimpse in time at the lowest mark, the panic of two weeks ago, and saying, see? And that's not a valid argument. Let's just wait and see to the full effect. I will agree with him. In three months or six months when we're all done with tariffs and trade, if we lost it, I have a feeling that will be worth 12 trillion.
- [86:51]
Sammy Wink
Perfect. So second question was, does it make sense to threaten your friends and allies? Allies you may need to confront China. I think he must be referring to Europe.
- [87:05]
Donald Trump
Well, no, but Trump is not threatening them, but he's going back on a prior press and he told the NATO countries, you are ripping us off. There's 32 NACO members. This was in 2017, 18, 19. And there's only six of you that kept your 2014 promise to spend 2% of GDP. And if you keep doing that and you get in a jam, I'm not going to be necessarily here to help you, because you know what? You're using us and that's dangerous and you shouldn't do the Norse. Okay. And what happened when he left office? I think 19 of them were going to do it. Now it's all but nine. So that is the art of the deal. He says, you guys are ripping us off. Da, da, da, da, da. Is that Smart. I wouldn't do it. But is it going to be successful? I have a feeling that it is. And that's why I would be unsuccessful. Because I would say I don't really want to yell at them the way. But here's the other thing I would ask him. Do you think the Allies treat their patron that went over there twice to save Europe from itself and a third time risked cities like New York and San Francisco and a nuclear game of poker with the Soviet Union to preserve the European integrity? In other words, our doctrine in the Cold War was if the Soviet army invades Europe and NATO cannot hold, hold them, and it probably couldn't, then we're going to, we're going to tell them get back or were going to use nuclear weapons and they would go after us, not Europe. So we did all of that. And what was our reward for that? They're running a $200 billion Mercantile High Tariff against us. That's not very nice to do that.
- [88:58]
Sammy Wink
No, that isn't so. Here is number three. As a historian, this is a little bit surly. As a historian, you should know how the Smoot Hawley tariffs choked the Japanese economy in the 1930s and eventually led to Pearl Harbor. Trump's draconian tariffs on China could have a similar unintended consequence.
- [89:20]
Donald Trump
It didn't choke. The Smoot Harley act of 32 didn't get enacted till 33. Fascism was already full blast in Japan. But more importantly, it was irrelevant to the, to the Depression. The Depression was not caused by the Smoot Harley act because we were running. It was a stupid thing to do because we were running a surplus. It was caused by a panic of the stock market and then a overregulation of, and not letting the free market act on its own to recover by the New Deal that prolonged it. Japan, the reason that they had Pearl harbor is very clear and I kind of resent as a historian, as a non historian, let me teach you something. Japan attacked Pearl harbor for three reasons. Number one, it understood that the United States was rebuilding its navy. And in late 1941, the Japanese government knew that the United States was making North Carolina class and soon Iowa class battleships. They were designing them. Their intelligence said that they knew about 27. They said, and Yamamoto reportedly said, I can give them hell for six months. They really thought that if they waited, they were going to lose. And why were they angry? Number two, they were angry because they felt that the British and the United States had no business in Asia because after World War I, they said they had no imperial enclave like the British or the French. And they looked at that situation in 1940 and they said, oh my God, there is no more. There's no more French Indochina. The Vichy, they. France was defeated. And the bread basket, the rice basket is ours. And they took it. And then they said, oh my gosh, the Dutch East Indies with all that oil, modern Indian, oh man, that's what we. And they went to take it and they said to themselves, the only thing that's stopping us from making this whole thing is this paltry little force in Pearl Harbor. And they moved the 7th Fleet from San Diego in January. It was stupid. And they only have these nine ancient battleships from World War I. And three carriers are. Maybe they're there, maybe they're not. They weren't there. And then we've got Singapore and it's. It's not going to be able. So they decided on December 7th and 8th to preempt and knock out Pearl harbor and Singapore and then tell the British we have all of the rubber of Malaysia and to tell the Americans we're going to have Midway wake. And now the United States and we want a deal. That's what they thought. This is our empire. That was number two. And then number three, they were very angry that right before Pearl harbor, in the prior year and a half, the Roosevelt administration stopped all export of recycled steel, iron, junk stuff, all the stuff that we used to send them for their steel industry, raw materials and oil. It had nothing to do with a Smoot Harley act. We cut off oil. And they thought that that was. And then number four, what. Could I ask the economist what was happening on December 7 and what were the Japanese talking about and why did they pick that date? Where was the German army on December 7th? It was about. At the first subway station of Moscow. And supposedly Army Group center could see the gold dome on the Kremlin. And they looked at Europe. Can this economist ask me what city in Europe was non fascist? Maybe Lisbon? No. Madrid? No. Paris? No. Amsterdam? No. Berlin? No. Copenhagen? No. I don't know. Oslo? No. Stockholm? No. Athens? No. Rome? No. Oh, I know. Warsaw. No, there's not a single one. So the Japanese looked at this and they said, oh my gosh, that's the future of the world. They won. There's only Britain left. And if we go into. And the Soviet Union is kaput and we have interest in the Soviet Union's eastern coast and there's nothing there stopping us, and Britain's all by itself. We just. And the United States is. Isolation is Disarmed and now we can do it before they rearm. So that was why they did it, had nothing to do with some tariff. Jesus.
- [94:20]
Sammy Wink
Exactly. Well, let's go ahead. We are. We want one more. Okay, one more.
- [94:25]
Donald Trump
I'm enjoying this. I thought you were going to give me difficult questions. I'm getting very arrogant.
- [94:29]
Sammy Wink
Yeah. The fourth one, he quotes Gordon Chang and suggests it's Gordon Chang's argument. So I'd rather go to the fifth one, which I think is going to be very interesting.
- [94:38]
Donald Trump
I know him well. He's a very bright guy.
- [94:40]
Sammy Wink
Why was Russia excluded from tariffs? That's his most. Bizarrely, he says Russia was excluded.
- [94:48]
Donald Trump
Is that a serious question? Could I ask him how much trade we're doing with Russia right now? Does he understand that the United States has banned all importation of Russian oil and the Trump administration is in a tense negotiation with Putin right now? And he has said that if Putin does not cooperate or go halfway way, he's going to extend the oil embargo by embargoing any country that buys embargoed Russian oil. So India, China, Iran, anybody who buys it will have an embargo on their products and that's going to force. So would he please tell me how much stuff is coming in from Russia? None. Almost none. So why would you just insult your trade partners and we're going to put a 150% when there's nothing there to do it? If he really. And why would you want to do that when the Europeans, which he says that we're bullying, are right now, as I speak, are secretly or maybe not so secret, importing Russian oil and gas. And if you want to put a tariff on that, we could do it to our Europeans too. So, I mean, that's. I don't know. Stay in.
- [96:08]
Sammy Wink
It's very good.
- [96:10]
Donald Trump
Don't dare talk about history.
- [96:12]
Sammy Wink
I know you're not. Thank you for that. Non economist answers to those things.
- [96:17]
Donald Trump
I hate that term. Stay in your lane.
- [96:20]
Sammy Wink
Yeah. Mr. Martin Nk. Thank you nonetheless for this because perhaps there are other readers out there that are.
- [96:31]
Donald Trump
I enjoy his questions, but. Yeah, he shouldn't say as a, you know, you're not economist. You can't talk about the economy or.
- [96:38]
Sammy Wink
I. Yeah.
- [96:39]
Donald Trump
Maybe I should start doing. I just read an article where a person wrote an essay on classical Athens, but I did not see a PhD in classics or ancient history. We don't. Who wants to do that?
- [96:51]
Sammy Wink
Yeah, exactly.
- [96:52]
Donald Trump
Sometimes 30 years in academia.
- [96:55]
Sammy Wink
Yeah.
- [96:56]
Donald Trump
I need thinking.
- [96:57]
Sammy Wink
And we can also attest to the problem of academia. Leading to less knowledge.
- [97:02]
Donald Trump
Anyway, I'll just say one last Parthian shot to Martin. In some ways, who were the three. I just thought, who were the three greatest contributors to classical languages, thought and culture? Do they have PhDs in? No. Heinrich Schliemann, a German banker of the late 19th century who said, you know, all the classicists are wrong. The Homeric poems were not mythology. There was actually a city in Troy and a city in Mycenae. And then after the end of the Mycenaean age and the Dark Ages, that was exaggerated and it turned into myth. But the actual event was mythicized. It happened. And I'll go excavate. How about the Iliad was written down and it repeats. 30% of the Iliad are epithets or type scenes. And they're just rosy finger dawn, rosy finger don, Rosy finger dawn. He fell and his armor clattered upon him. But who was the person who said, ah, Milman Perry, kind of a renegade who kind of in academia. But they hated his guts. And he said it was oral and I'm going to go to Serbo Croatia and talk to bards and see if they can memorize poems as long as the Iliad. And when he did, he found out, write me a poem about me coming to see you. And 30% was repeated. That's how you do it. And so he proved that the Iliad and the Odyssey were mostly. I mean, there's some refinements that maybe he had notes because he was synonymous with the beginning of writing in the Greek world. But anyway, the point is he proved it was an oral. I just finished this rant with Mycenaean. It doesn't have alpha beta gamma, Phoetian derived letters. Linear B. Hmm. It was a Semitic people like linear A. So the Mycenaeans and the people of Athens and Pylos, they were all non Greeks. That's what they had, those big lion gate, these big citadels. They weren't Greeks. So these foreigners came into Greece and ruled it. And then they collapsed. And then during the Dark Ages, the Dorians came and there was for the first time Greeks and they had Phoenician known. And then this ark, this architect and cryptographer, cryptologist I should say, In World War II, Michael Ventress came in and said, let me look at this very carefully. And using the arts of cryptology, he said, this is a vowel, this is a consonant, this is a word, this is a case ending. And he began to plug it in and it was Greek. They were all Greek. The only difference was that they didn't have a sophisticated Alphabet yet, and they had borrowed pictographs from the Egyptians, from people in Asia Minor, and created this Linear B script. And then they were wiped out for various reasons. I don't mean complete. And their remnants in the Dark Ages made myths about how great they were. That's what we call Greek mythology. Ajax, Zeus, the whole bit, Hercules. And then in the city state, when it came around 720, 750, borrowing from the Phoenician Alphabet and adding vowels, they took that language and they did not use the dead script that they didn't really know about. They'd forgotten. They didn't know it. It was all destroyed. They'd seen little. Every time a farmer would go around Mycenae or Tirrensi might fall into a shaft grave and see these tablets in the Iliad, there's mention of little writing. Probably not Phoenician letters, it was probably Linear B. But anyway, then they created their. And they were all Greeks the whole time, probably from the fourth millennium. So my point is, Martin, some of the best things I've ever done in my field have been done by people that were not in our lane.
- [101:18]
Sammy Wink
All right, well, Victor, thank you. That was absolutely fascinating on the linear B and the academics that dominate the field of ancient Greece.
- [101:28]
Donald Trump
I wrote a book about it called the Other Greek.
- [101:31]
Sammy Wink
Absolutely fascinating. Well, thank you very much for your discussion today. Really loved it on fascism and really clarifying some of the things that we hear in our rhetoric today calling each other fascists. So I hope that I want to.
- [101:46]
Donald Trump
Thank everybody who's been sending me cures for chronic sinitis. And I'm reading everything you wrote, and I'm trying them because I don't want. I just went to the nt. I don't not want another operation. So I'm trying to. But they were so nice, all these people.
- [102:03]
Sammy Wink
Yeah, amazing. There were lots of cures. It's just incredible. All right, well, thank you and thanks to the audience for joining us, choosing to join us on this weekend episode.
- [102:15]
Donald Trump
Thank you, everybody, for watching and listening.
- [102:18]
Sammy Wink
This is Sammy Wink and Victor Davis Hansen, and we're signing off.