Loading summary
Jon Stewart
Oh, such a clutch off season pickup, Dave.
Chris Christie
I was worried we'd bring back the same team.
Jon Stewart
I meant those Blackout motorized shades.
Chris Christie
Blinds.com made it crazy affordable to replace our old blinds.
Jon Stewart
Hard to install.
Chris Christie
No, it's easy. I installed these and then got some from my mom. She talked to a design consultant for free and scheduled a professional measure and install.
Jon Stewart
Hall of fame son.
Chris Christie
They're the number one online retailer of custom window coverings in the world.
Jon Stewart
Blinds.com is the goat shop. Blinds.com right now and get up to 45% off select styles plus a professional measure. Rules and restrictions may apply. What do you know about the lioness program? Are you a lioness? I run it. From Taylor Sheridan comes the Paramount original series starring Zoe Saldana. I choose the asset, I choose the COVID I build the plan and I run it.
Chris Christie
Me.
Jon Stewart
With academy award winner Morgan Freeman and academy award winner Nicole Kidman.
Chris Christie
Everyone's watching on this one, and I do mean everyone.
Jon Stewart
Lioness New season now streaming exclusively on Paramount Foreign. Welcome once again to the weekly show. My name is Jon Stewart. It is end of January, I'm going to say 2025. President Trump has been president forever or an hour. The confusion, the chaos, which I assuming is the point, has been stunning even for those expecting there to be this kind of. I mean, they said shock and awe. They were coming in with shock and awe, which really is not a phrase that you expect to be deployed on your own country. I was under the impression that it was the kind of thing that we would deploy on countries we had hostilities with. But it turns out the hostility is with us. It's the people, the American people that are going to get the shock and awe. And I guess the most recent shock and awe is all the money. They just. Let's just stop the money. Just real quick. I'm just going to, you know, what, what are we doing there? What are we paying for? Let's just, let's just stop the money real quick and just take a. Take a look at it. I imagine you could just keep paying the money and take a look at it while it's happening. But. But I guess they wanted to stop it. They don't want to see it in motion. Apparently now they've rolled back. They're putting back in, I guess, Meals on Wheels and a couple of other things that, you know, they don't want to kill old people, but the rest of us, anyway, this is, it's, it's, it's a lot. It's a lot. And to help us get through it, you know, I can talk with the home team as much as we want. I want to get some insight on somebody who really knows Donald Trump, has spoken out against. Donald Trump, has also collaborated. He's done the collabs and spoken out. But let's get to him right now to hopefully get a sense of where this thing may, in fact be going and what are some of the darker undertones that are behind it. So without further ado, Governor Chris Christie, 55th. Governor. 55th, yeah. Of New Jersey, obviously ran for president 2016. 2024. Governor, what's happening?
Chris Christie
Exactly what I predicted would happen, John. I mean, I ran for president for a year telling everybody that this guy has not changed, he's not different, and that character matters, and it matters more than any particular issue. And what we're seeing now in the first. Is it now 10 days or so?
Jon Stewart
Years, I believe years is that.
Chris Christie
The problem is gonna be that not everybody, in fact, not most people, will disagree with everything he does. But the underlying problem, in my view, is the pettiness, the vindictiveness, the anger. All those things will inform much of what he does, and it's going to lead to big problems, I think, in the country over the long term.
Jon Stewart
So why, you know, you've known this about him. How long have you known him? For? Many, many years.
Chris Christie
23 years.
Jon Stewart
23 years. Okay. I don't imagine that the pettiness, vindictiveness, and anger and those various things that you talk about in terms of character just recently surfaced that he went through some sort of midlife crisis and ended up with some personality tics that old people get. We've known this for a very long time. And by the way, you were one of his boy. He enjoyed making fun of you, right?
Chris Christie
Oh, yeah, still does.
Jon Stewart
But in 2016, you helped him. You. You helped him in the debates and all that. What is it that keeps people in the orbit? Is it a fear that you will lose your political career if you go against him? Is it a close to power? He makes people supplicants. How?
Chris Christie
Well, I think that for different people, it's different things, John. I think both of those factors that you just put up there are the real reasons for lots of different people. For me, back in 2016, I had known him, but not extraordinarily well. I'd known him for a long time, but nobody really gets very close to Trump. But when you are a acquaintance of his, as I was during the years prior to 2016, he can be enormously charming, I'm sure Enormously engaging, very solicitous. And for me, both as U.S. attorney for seven of those years and then as governor for a number of those years, he was all those things to me. And so that was part of it, and the other part for me was that it was like, okay, I, I ran in the primary against him. He beat me. I'm a Republican. He's gonna be the nominee. I'll be with him, and try to make him better than what he is at the moment. And that was my motivation at the time, and I turned out to be wrong.
Jon Stewart
Even in that moment, when he's doing things like he makes the. Whatever it was, the Oreo Joe, or he makes you a supplicant, and this is 2016. And then you watched him as president, you were part of his transition team. You know, he. He went out of his way to kind of shame you. Right. Why go back in 2020? Like, what. What was it that made you still stick with. You know, it's. It's one thing to say, okay, well, that I didn't really know in 2016. In 2020, you clearly knew. So what is it then?
Chris Christie
Well, in 2020, I think what it was was looking at these two guys, looking at Joe Biden and Donald Trump, and I really felt at the time like Biden was just too old to be president and wouldn't be able to do the job. And so I didn't like either choice, quite frankly.
Jon Stewart
But you went with the one that was fatally flawed, character wise.
Chris Christie
Right, I went with that one as opposed to the one who, you know, was, in my mind, mentally incapable of. Of doing the job.
Jon Stewart
Had you, had. You had dealings with Biden at that time and that. That's where you drew that. That conclusion.
Chris Christie
Yeah. And known him for a long time. Like, I've known Joe Biden longer than I know Donald Trump because Biden and I both went to the University of Delaware, obviously not.
Jon Stewart
Not at the same. I wouldn't.
Chris Christie
Not at the same time. No.
Jon Stewart
Fair enough.
Chris Christie
But Biden was a regular presence there when I was a student and I was the president of the student body. So I wound up getting to serve on the board where Biden was as well. So I got to know him and we kept in touch over the years and then reacquainted when he was vice president and I was governor, and he was very helpful during Sandy and made a number of trips to the state where I hosted him to help see the damage and do all that. So when we had kept in touch over all those years, And I just saw the precipitous decline in the Joe Biden I knew when I was a student to the Joe Biden I knew even when he was vice president, to the guy who was running for president. And so that was the reason that I did what I did. And quite frankly then on election night of 2020, was when I made the break, because when he came out, meaning President Trump came out and made his speech on election night where he said the election had been stolen. I was on ABC at the time.
Jon Stewart
That was your bridge too far.
Chris Christie
Yes.
Jon Stewart
Not to use the bridge, by the way. Sensitive topic. I don't want to go bridge.
Chris Christie
Thank you very much, John, your kindness is overwhelming.
Jon Stewart
Thank you so much.
Chris Christie
We usually use that was the water over the dam, but again, that's just in our family now.
Jon Stewart
Okay, fair enough. Yeah, you got to really reach for metaphors when I'm talking to ex politicians here.
Chris Christie
You got to be very careful.
Jon Stewart
So many different scandals. Yeah.
Chris Christie
But you know, in the end, I said to him, and I said it to him that night, that you have no way of knowing that this election was stolen and what you're doing here is damaging our democracy and I can't be supportive of it. And I said that on the air. I said it was a disgrace on the air that night. And we really, except for one or two conversations, have not spoken since. And that was November 2020.
Jon Stewart
Look, this is, it's. I feel it in my bones, a certain fright about where this thing is gonna go. And the most difficult thing for me to reckon is that moment that you speak about that from November to January, that inability to concede the election results without any shred of legitimate court tested proof, anything that has evidentiary standards, as you know, the court system was really the only thing that held up the fact that January 6th happened not as a moment of, you know, a crime of passion, but as the result of careful weeks and months of planning by his legal team as to which obstacle he next had to reach. Like I think what they said was, this is your final shot. If we can't stop this electoral count, it's over. If we can't somehow make it chaotic and get it thrown into the House. Right. The most anti democratic thing you could possibly achieve, at least in my mind, in an election in America. He was not punished for that. He was rewarded for that with not just an electoral college win, but a popular vote win. So what are we now to make of this? We've all got in our minds that Chris Christie moment, a bridge too far Even for someone that I had doubts about character flaws, all these different things, he finally crossed for you, the Rubicon. And America is unmoved by the character argument and the autocrat argument. So what do you. What are you left with?
Chris Christie
Well, I think there's two things, right? First off, we have to concede that he is the most fearless communicator I've seen politically in my lifetime. And I don't mean that as a compliment. He is willing to say anything over and over and over again with passion. And for a lot of people who, John, look, you and I spend a lot of time thinking, reading, talking about this stuff. Most Americans don't. And so for them who just hear a snippet of this or that, they listen to who they think is most convincing, and that sways a lot of people. I think the other thing about what happened in 2024 is that elections are always choices at the presidential level. Most Americans feel some type of obligation to vote in a presidential election. They may not vote in any of the other ones, but they feel like for president, I should vote. And turnout reflects that. And it was a choice here that I think really unfortunately for the country, the Democrats didn't present a choice that for a lot of Americans, made sense. And I blame that on President Biden because he made a promise to us in 2020. He said he was gonna be a transitional leader. And we all understood, or thought we understood what that meant, which was he was gonna serve one term, cuz at 82, he was just gonna be too old to be able to do this. And then for whatever reason, he changed his mind. And I think if Joe Biden had left, had said, not left the presidency, but had said after the midterms, you know what? I held off the Republicans here at the midterms. I did my job, and now it's time to turn it over to a new generation of Democrats to see who the next nominee will be. I think the Democrats would have had a vigorous primary. A lot of really good potential candidates out there. Josh Shapiro from Pennsylvania, Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan, you go through a whole list of them. And instead what he did was hang on till he was practically being shoved out the door with his fingernails grasping the door jamb and left Kamala Harris as the only option. And vice presidents are never well thought of, no matter which party it is, and gave her 107 days to try to convince the American people that she was better. And I think strategically for her, the big mistake was she didn't distance herself from BIDEN and when 72% of the country, as the last poll, the last weekend said the country's on the wrong track, not separating yourself from the person who was president when it went to 72% wrong track is a politically fatal mistake. So I think, Jon, for people who don't focus on politics, who maybe didn't think about this election until two or three weeks or maybe even less before Election Day, all that stuff matters and is part of the explanation for why he did as well as he did.
Jon Stewart
But let's go. You know, it's interesting because you talk about it in terms of the people, right. And you say it's, well, it's a binary choice, this person versus this person. But I think there's something deeper here about a system of government that people no longer feel is responsive enough for them, that democracy in and of itself has gotten sort of sclerotic and is not agile in the way that it needs to be. And is it that, you know, I don't necessarily disagree with Donald Trump's diagnoses. The system is rigged against people. Powerful interests have the ear of our politicians. The government is not responding necessarily to the discomfort of its, let's call them customers. Right. I think it's a Trojan horse. It seems like what the Republicans have in mind is kind of an undoing of the relationship that we have established between the people and the government since the New Deal. And further than that, the Immigration act of the 60s and the Civil Rights act of the 60s. These are the things that this Project 2025 wants to disassemble. It's sort of like Project 1929. Is that their aim and everything else is sort of noise is the signal here, a refashioning of the relationship between the government and the people.
Chris Christie
I think that maybe the goal of some of the folks who work with Donald Trump. I don't think Donald Trump has any overarching philosophical goal except that he wants to be powerful and listened to and in charge. I think what is causing this is you're right about the underlying problem, which I've heard from Republicans and Democrats, which is I just want some competence. Like it's their objection is less to in the main on the programs and things that government does is less about the programs in a lot of instances and more about the way they function or don't function, the way they waste money, the way they don't bring things to the people that they really need and aren't responsive. And you can look at this in a number of different ways. And the Wildfires in California are just the latest example of it. But people are like, how the hell does this happen? Why isn't government on top of this? And we've seen it over and over again in a number of different ways. Everything from something as serious as the wildfires to something as just annoying as the air traffic control system. And why are people so delayed when they're flying around the country all the time? Because it doesn't seem like the FAA can run the air traffic control system competently anymore. And I think that that anger, when people feel like they're paying a lot of money for this government and what are they getting for it is something that Trump was really able to tap into. And that for whatever reason, the Democrats felt a need to defend it holistically rather than say, look, you're right, it can be done better, and here are ideas for how it can be done better, rather than say, he's wrong, you're wrong. There's nothing wrong here. Everything's okay. Well, people, they have eyes of their own and they make their own conclusions. So I think it's a little more complicated.
Jon Stewart
All right, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Hey, I'm Ryan Reynolds.
Chris Christie
Recently I asked Mint Mobile's legal team if big wireless companies are allowed to raise prices due to inflation.
Jon Stewart
They said yes.
Chris Christie
And then when I asked if raising prices technically violates those onerous two year contracts, they said, what the are you talking about? You insane? Hollywood. So to recap, we're cutting the price of mint unlimited from $30 a month to just $15 a month. Give it a try@mintmobile.com switch.
Jon Stewart
$45 upfront payment equivalent to $15 per month. New customers on first three month plan only. Taxes and fees. Extra speed slower above 40 gigabytes. ET details roll out. Transformers 1 is now streaming on Paramount Plus.
Chris Christie
Awesome. It's the blast from beginning to end. Okay, stop.
Jon Stewart
I'm in.
Chris Christie
Woo.
Jon Stewart
Transformers 1 rated PG now streaming on Paramount Plus. All right, we are back. You know, we sort of have two tranches there. One is the wildfire and the other is kind of the day to day. Jesus, when I want to apply for something, I have to go through 10 pages. And by the way, you know, if we were to have a moonshot rather than going to Mars, I would like to see all of our best engineers and technicians on a bureaucratic moonshot to try and do a Manhattan Project of ridiculous fucking paperwork and how you simplify that in a way that makes sense. So I have great sympathy for that. The wildfire thing is slightly different in my mind because that also speaks to a larger. You know, everybody wants to stop these things and react to them. Like Los Angeles and climate change and no water. And, like, there's a lot of factors that when. When a tornado comes and there's a fire, I don't. I don't know how many trucks you could park near the area and how much water you could have that would have stopped. What was something that, from a lot of the firefighters I talked to out there, they thought was inevitable, that when you put that many houses in that dry a place with those high winds, this is going to happen. We're willing to scream at Los Angeles because they hired a lesbian fire chief and a black mayor, but nobody wants to talk about the way that these disasters have been exacerbated by climate and all kinds of other things.
Chris Christie
Well, and look, I would say to you, yeah, everybody gets selective about what they want to get outraged about, often depending upon where you sit politically or philosophically. But I do think that there are things that can and should have been done in that instance. And quite frankly, let's personalize it. We're both from New Jersey. We went through Sandy, and I think we've done a lot of things since Sandy that we learned to make structures more resilient, to not be piling up houses all along the shore that can't possibly sustain storms, to reinforce all of our infrastructure in ways that recognize that these storms can now happen so that we protect those things. And I think that that's what people are expecting.
Jon Stewart
But it's still hubris. I mean, there is still a certain extent, like, okay, Sandy hit. So we learned our lesson. Everybody eight feet up on stilts, and let's put a berm up. But, like, God is going to come in and go, like, really? Stilts, you think? Stilts? Like, we have to have a certain acceptance of our vulnerability on this. I think we can always do a better job. There is no question in my mind that there were things that could be done. But when we focus so much on. On DEI and all this other dumb shit that they think is determinative, like, they built communities that were really dense with millions of people in arid areas that have fired things. Like, I'm pretty sure that was not dei. That was probably a white dude who designed that. Like, what are we doing?
Chris Christie
Well, and I. Look, I think you and I are saying the same thing. I think that there's bad decisions that are made and you can't the other thing that I used to say to people all the time when I was governor was there's some things that I just can't help. Like, you could do the very best you can and there's some things you can't help. Now, people don't like to hear that. And part of it is that people just don't like when bad things happen for obvious reasons and they need someone or something to blame. Now, when you're also doing things that don't make sense to people, those become easy straw men to knock down. Right. So if people look at dei, and I think a majority of the people in the country now feel this way, that maybe that's not the best way to be making some of these selections and choices of people for jobs. And maybe it should be based predominantly, if not exclusively, on competence. It creates an easy strawman, John, for folks who are looking for someone or something to blame.
Jon Stewart
Right, I understand, but. So let's break that down a little bit. Cause I think that is an incredibly powerful thread that's been going through our society for a long time, that this idea of DEI is anti merit. It takes our meritocracy that we've work so hard to fix which says, like, when were we a meritocracy? Like, at what point is diversity less competitive? Introducing more people into the system who have different skill sets and come from different things? You know, hiring is subjective. There's no objective test. It's always subjective. Let's look at the Secretary of Defense. Right?
Chris Christie
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
Well, now we live in a meritocracy. We've restored it. Lloyd Austin is the DEI candidate, even though he had, I don't know, 40 years of experience running large organizations. Like, if you got those two resumes between he and Pete Hegseth, which one would be considered of merit?
Chris Christie
And that's my point. My point is that just be diversity in and of itself is not something that causes there not to be merit hires. Okay? You can look at two resumes blind. And if your example is a really good one, whether it's Lloyd Austin or Pete Hegseth on the paper, Lloyd Austin has significantly more high level experience to be Secretary of Defense than Pete Hegseth does. I think that what has developed over time, because some people have taken that to an extreme, meaning the DEI implementation is it allows people to think that, and in some instances they're absolutely true. It's absolutely true that those decisions were made purely for the diversity part of it, with the merit being well below it.
Jon Stewart
But where is that done? I'm trying to think like my experience. You have experience hiring as well, right?
Chris Christie
I do a lot.
Jon Stewart
I have experience hiring. What I found was hiring has a certain inertia to it. Right. Generally, the people that kind of started whatever industry or whatever office did generally hire close to people that resemble them. So. And I'm not even talking about white, black. What I'm talking about, like, I'll just go with late night comedy, right? David Letterman revolutionized late night comedy. He did it with a lot of Harvard Lampoon, snl, sameway writers. So the comedy writing industry was for a long time, not necessarily out of malevolence or prejudice. The inertia of it, the status quo of it was nerdy white dudes from Harvard and the other Ivy Leagues.
Chris Christie
Very bad to say about Conan.
Jon Stewart
That's horrible to be terrible to say.
Chris Christie
Saying that about Conan, John.
Jon Stewart
But even, even when we went to like, oh, we're going to do blind submissions, what we didn't realize is all the agents are also steeped in that same status quo. So all the resumes, even when we would get them, still predominantly when we went specifically to say, now this is what you would consider DEI give us. Not that. Open it up to make sure you give us women, people of color, other writers so that we can at least see what that is. And all of a sudden we found these incredible writers. Now, you could say, oh, you put diversity over competence. But that's the red herring. We didn't. We opened up what were stagnant pools, pools that were incestuous, and we opened up those tributaries. And isn't that what increases competition, not decreases it? Like, here's, here's another example. All this talk about meritocracy. Vivek Ramaswamy comes out and says, all right, well, we need these engineers on H1B visas, right? They're very talented, and everybody freaks the fuck out. How dare you prioritize these. What better engineers? Like, what are we actually talking about?
Chris Christie
Right? Look, I would give you the way that I tried to approach it. I became U.S. attorney in New Jersey in 02. I had never worked in the office before, so when I got there, I just did a lot of walking around the office to see like, okay, who's here? And John, it was the whitest malest office I had ever been in in my life. And it was. And I was coming from private law practice, right? So what I did was I said, look, I am forcing us to go out and recruit candidates who are African American, Latino, Asian, women, and bring them to me. And if they're not good, I'm not gonna hire them. But I'm convinced we're not seeing him. And the aha moment for me on that concept and why it was the right way to go was there was a young guy that I hired very early on, African American, University of Michigan, University of Penn law School clerks for Alan Page, the former Minnesota Viking defensive tackle in the Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Jon Stewart
Absolutely Purple People leader.
Chris Christie
And I said, and he's from New Jersey, grew up in Maplewood. And I said to him, why did you ever apply here before? And he said, because I knew people like me wouldn't get hired. And we then went about this process of hiring a large number of African American, Latino and Asian prosecutors. But I would tell you that every one of them checked both boxes. They check the box of. They now look more like the community we represent than we did before. And these are really good lawyers.
Jon Stewart
But that's the point of dei. DEI is not there to just change the color scheme and the palette. It's to look at a broader. And by the way, it includes hiring veterans, people of different socioeconomic status. Like, it's not just race or gender. Like diversity brings a resilience to your organizations that it might not have otherwise.
Chris Christie
And I don't think, John, that that's the way it's been implemented across the board in government. And I think people see examples of that and it makes them, and it makes them paint the entire effort with the same brush.
Jon Stewart
But without that, when has merit ever been implemented in that way? Legacy admissions to colleges, legacy admissions to the big firms. Like, why do we assume that the so called meritocracy, the way that things were done in the past, when America was great, was an objectively meritocratic system? It wasn't. It's, it's, it's rigged. It's always been rigged. It's more rigged by that than any measure of bringing on somebody whose experience for the position may be slightly more unorthodox.
Chris Christie
And my argument to you is I don't think it makes it any better to just rig it in a different direction. And I think that's what people perceive was going on with dei.
Jon Stewart
It's not rigging it in a different direction, it's unrigging it.
Chris Christie
But that's where we disagree.
Jon Stewart
All right, little quick break and then we're coming right back.
Chris Christie
Pluto TV is the place for movie fans like me and TV fans like me. They've got something for everyone and it's totally free. You can binge laugh out loud sitcoms like Frasier and rewatch cult classics like Higher Learning. Whether you're in the mood to solve a little crime before bedtime with NCIS or Tracker, or curl up with a surefire hit like Forrest Gump, Run. Forrest. Pluto TV has thousands of movies and shows, all for free. Pluto TV Stream now pay Never. With thousands of free movies and shows, there's something for everyone on Pluto tv.
Jon Stewart
They've got all the crime shows like.
Chris Christie
Ncis, CSI Tracker and Blue Bloods, and great movies like Forrest Gump and Face off, all for free. Pluto TV Stream Now Pay Never.
Jon Stewart
Okay, and we're back.
Chris Christie
Governor, I think there have been a number of areas where there are people who hire certain folks just for their diversity. And I've seen it happen here in New Jersey, in the government since I left, where people say, I am going to make sure that I have one of every. It's almost like a half a Noah's Ark. Okay, I'm gonna have one of these and one of these and one of these and one of these.
Jon Stewart
But you just told me that's what you did in the prosecutor's office.
Chris Christie
No, no. What I did was get them in to interview them. And if it turned out. If it turned out, Jon, that they were also really good lawyers, they got hired. I'm talking about something different. I'm talking about predetermining the outcome in the way that you just talked about. And I believe that legacy admissions predetermine the outcome that there have been some in charge of government across this country who have predetermined outcomes and said, I am going to have this many African Americans, this many Latinos, this many Asians, this many lesbians, this many gay men. And I think that when people see that, they say to themselves, that's not right either. Not that the other way was completely right, but now you're really screwing it up. They're both wrong.
Jon Stewart
Right. But what?
Chris Christie
And I didn't get any objection when I did what I did in New Jersey. It wasn't like a bunch of people started picketing, saying when they started to see African American, Latino, and Asian and women prosecutors in the federal courthouse, that they started saying, what the hell is Christie doing over there? He's turning a place into this.
Jon Stewart
No, I know, but that's because there's been a purpose, purposeful dismantling of anything that looks to repair the damage done by what were the legacy and the exclusionary practices of the past. That's purposeful. The backlash against DEI is not a populist uprising against hiring. It's the purposeful framing of that through political actors. That's. I mean, that's what Christopher rufo. That's what DeSantis. Like, that's what these guys are doing intentionally. This isn't the world suddenly saying, oh, my God, what happened to our competence? Like, there was something about they wanted a diversity program in hiring pilots, and everybody was like, why don't they just hire the best pilots? And the idea is like, you really think they're out there just going, give me a black eye that doesn't know anything about, you know, the qualifications needed to become a pilot or won't study to become a pilot. It's just another way to retreat from. From, I think, the added competition of diverse populations.
Chris Christie
I would say that airlines would not hire pilots, given the importance of the safety of what they do.
Jon Stewart
Right.
Chris Christie
If they didn't think they were competent.
Jon Stewart
But you saw that was a huge story on the right.
Chris Christie
I did. However, I will also tell you that I think that a lot of people don't view certain government positions nearly as critical. And so they feel like, I can do this. And I think the public senses that. And that's the problem, John.
Jon Stewart
But they're getting blamed for the government's lack of agility and responsiveness. So where I object to is now suddenly we go. I appreciate the diagnosis. Right. Government not responding to the discomfort of the people in an agile way. What I don't appreciate is that that is being blamed on DEI and illegal immigration.
Chris Christie
I think that it's being blamed on political actors on the other side of this, John, who are. Are using it for their own political purposes. Let's be honest. There are people who, on the Democratic side of this who will do it to try to make themselves look more caring to the minority community, more in touch with the minority community. And I think that their motivations are craven in that regard. Not everybody, but I think a lot of them.
Jon Stewart
Listen, the best example of that was after George Floyd when the Democrats gathered. I can't remember where it was in the rotunda. Like in kente cloth.
Chris Christie
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
You know, it was Nancy Pelosi standing. And I agree with you. A lot of it can be performative, right?
Chris Christie
Yes. In Gucci shoes and kente cloth. You know, I mean, it's.
Jon Stewart
Exactly. But the fact that it's distasteful doesn't mean that it's. It's. It's not necessary. And I think. And this ties back in. Let's. And this will bring it back around maybe to. To Donald Trump and sort of how this is going, make America great again. You're not quite sure what they mean. Do they mean return it to the default setting, which is, I guess, as you said, white, male and competent. Is that the idea behind this? And is that what people are voting for? And in your mind, is that Donald Trump's vision of this?
Chris Christie
No, I think Donald Trump thought it was a cool slogan that would respond to what people were feeling both when he ran in 2016 and when he ran in 2024, which was, they were at that moment dissatisfied with the status quo. So if you can tie into that politically, rhetorically, and say, I'm gonna make America great again, it does two things. It tells people, I agree with you, it's not great now. And two, I'm the guy who can make it great like you remember it. And many Americans are gonna have different feelings about when it was great and what made it great. The classic marketing tool of Donald Trump on this was it can mean whatever you want it to mean, John. And so people think Donald Trump has a vision.
Jon Stewart
You don't think it's more purposeful than that? I mean, the co opting of the language of like America First, I mean, it's got so many.
Chris Christie
Look, well, those are two different things.
Jon Stewart
But, but they've, they've really put them together, you know, what did he say in his inaugural speech? I will always put America first. He's must be very aware of the evocation of that.
Chris Christie
No, the fact that you would assume that Donald Trump knows any American history is startling to me, John, because he doesn't.
Jon Stewart
I honestly don't think you're giving him enough credit. I think.
Chris Christie
No, you're, you're wrong.
Jon Stewart
Okay?
Chris Christie
I've known him a lot longer and a lot closer than you have.
Jon Stewart
No, I don't, I don't know him at all.
Chris Christie
And John, I am telling you, he doesn't know. I could give a lot of examples of how he messes up American history. All right, all right, we'll talk about him for a second. He took me to the Lincoln Bedroom one time and he pointed to the desk in the Lincoln Bedroom and he said, that's where Lincoln wrote the Gettysburg Address. Now, anybody who has read the history of the Gettysburg Address knows that Lincoln wrote the Gettysburg Address on the train on the way to Gettysburg.
Jon Stewart
I guess that was why it's so short.
Chris Christie
Yeah. What? Exactly, right. It's a short train ride. What he did at the desk was sign the Emancipation Proclamation. And I said to the then president, now president, I said, no, no, no, no, no. It was the Emancipation Proclamation there. He wrote the speech on the way to Gettysburg. And he looked at me, said, chris, you really gonna correct me on this? I'm the President, I live here. So I have to tell you, John, I think you're giving him too much credit. But let me say there's a difference, I think, between make America Great again and America First. And what I used to say in the campaign was America first. I want everybody to raise their hand here who believes in America fourth. Put them up.
Jon Stewart
Right, right.
Chris Christie
America Fourth.
Jon Stewart
Yeah, well, it's sort of, it's one of those things that goes without saying in my mind.
Chris Christie
Exactly right. So these are things that are inoffensive when you look at them literally and allows you to then sell to people a couple of things, right? The people who are there now. It was Obama and Hillary back in 16. It was Biden and Harris in 24. America's not great because of them. America's not first because of them. It is a purely political and rhetorical idea that, and this is the point I think you were getting at when I interrupted you, there are people around him who want to populate that in a way that is much deeper and much different. But I'm telling you, from Trump's perspective, he came up with that stuff and just went like, this will sell. And he's selling it.
Jon Stewart
Wow.
Chris Christie
Remember, this is a Democrat. Trump was a Democrat. When I first met Trump, he was a Democrat donating to Hillary Clinton. This is not a guy.
Jon Stewart
But again, transactional I'm sure to try and get.
Chris Christie
Look, John, as transactional as you might wanna be, if you are steeped in what Donald Trump now says he's steeped in philosophically, how could you write a check to Hillary Clinton? You couldn't, because you'd say to yourself, look, that's, to use your phrase, a bridge too far. Like, okay, I'll give to this one or that one, because I have to, cuz I need permits in New York or something like that. But why am I giving to Hillary Clinton? Well, I'm giving Hillary Clinton because at that time he could have cared less about anything philosophically. And I think people are reading too much into his, him philosophically. He is transactional, John. Whatever gets him from here to there.
Jon Stewart
So, so then let's talk, let's talk about then the, the, the people around him. I, I definitely view the way he runs this country as. Look, he has run the Trump Organization. It's not a publicly traded company. He runs it he is the, the emperor of that empire. He is the, the king of it all. And I think that's where he's most comfortable being obviously. And he is looking at the federal government to reflect that ethos that he is steeped in that kind of imperious way. What I am seeing is our system is not very well prepared to handle somebody who's going to push it. There's enough cracks and air and loopholes and things within our system that if you want to push it. And by the way, he's nullified Congress because now he's got the House and the Senate and he's got the judiciary. Like everybody wants to say, okay, this is, he's a fascist. What I'm looking at it as, haven't we handed him the keys to that type of ruler? He's been handed it democratically. Like that's what's most frightening to me is you always think of the last bulwark is the consent of the governed. Right. He has that. And the Democrats are in utter disarray. So how do you realistically stand up to a person that is very comfortable operating at that imperial level of our government at its kind of. The founders didn't think of it that way. They thought it would be a check and balance between judiciary and legislative and executive. I don't think they viewed it as two parties fighting each other and a president that's going to push the shit out of this unitary executive. I mean they, they almost made it that the President was like an eight person board. So I've yet to see what is the effective response to a democratic system that can be used in the way that it was designed to create a more autocratic system.
Chris Christie
Well, a good question. And here's what the founders also didn't count on. That we would elect lousy people to the other branches or appoint lousy people to the other branches. Now you look at what's happening in Congress right now and you have a group of people who in the main are unwilling to stand up. I mean the only way a check on a power is effective is if you're willing to exercise the check. And the founders couldn't also make it self actualizing. There are human beings who have to actually do it. And my problem with folks in my party right now is that people who I know disagree, who I know know better, are so wed to their position that they are unwilling to say what they truly believe. And that's the problem with the way the system's operating. John. The system is fine. The people We've handed the keys to operate the system, not just the executive branch, but in the legislative branch, are not doing their job even to being honest with themselves.
Jon Stewart
So. And this is the question that gets back to what we talked about originally. And it's not meant. It's not a gotcha. It's not meant to. The thing. You were one of those people. You knew in 2016. You knew what this guy was. You knew all those things. You had rationalizations for why you didn't act upon that and call it out earlier. You, not only. It's not even that you stepped back, you actively participated in there. So you, I think, rightly have identified something, but very clearly it's something you yourself, I think, fell victim to. And you can say, well, in 2020, when he finally wouldn't concede, that's when I knew. But you did know, and these people know, and they don't do it. So what do you say to them and what do you say to yourself?
Chris Christie
Well, a few things. I think, first off, to be fair about your characterization of me.
Jon Stewart
Wait, when do I have to be?
Chris Christie
You don't have to be. I'm suggesting you might want to be.
Jon Stewart
All right, fair enough.
Chris Christie
That I did run against him in 2016.
Jon Stewart
But you weren't running against him. You were running for president. That's different.
Chris Christie
Well, no, no, no. It became pretty clear early that he became the front runner. And I'm not one of those people who tries to hit in the side pocket, Jon. As you know, I went right at him in 2016, no question, and in 2024. But I believed in the system that we just talked about.
Jon Stewart
Okay?
Chris Christie
And I said, okay, this is who the people have chosen. I'm going to go try to make him better. I'm going to work within the system to try to make him better. And that's what I did in 2016 and throughout the first term of his presidency was to continue to be the agitator to him, to try to do things differently. And one of the people had known him for a long time, so I could get him on the phone and say, this is wrong, suggest people to serve, that I think would make it better. That was a manifestation of my belief in the system. And what I concluded on the evening of 2020 was he didn't give a damn about the system right down to its very basic, which was the Democratic act of electing a president.
Jon Stewart
Right.
Chris Christie
And that's when I said, I'm out.
Jon Stewart
Do you still believe in the system?
Chris Christie
I do. And the reason that I still believe in the system is. Because there's no frigging alternative.
Jon Stewart
Well, apparently there's a bunch of alternatives.
Chris Christie
There's not. I mean, and I don't think there will be one with him either. You know, I still believe that. And you talked about the consent of the governed. That's why we have elections every two years now. If he does the things that I fear he will.
Jon Stewart
Do you really think it's going there? Do you think the chaos is purposeful to start invoking some of those more emergency type powers? Is that where this is going?
Chris Christie
No, I think the chaos is being done. Cuz that's the way he loves to operate. That's where he is most comfortable. He is most comfortable in chaos and he's most comfortable in having people fight with each other and have him be the ultimate arbiter of those fights. He loves that. He loves the interchange and the back and forth. Not for educational purposes.
Jon Stewart
So this is all just. This is all just a fucking episode of the Apprentice.
Chris Christie
It's all a TV show.
Jon Stewart
The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense is going to be like meat loaf and Gary Busey arguing in the boardroom.
Chris Christie
All a TV show. Jon. Look, Jon, what have you heard him say about the way he makes selections for positions?
Jon Stewart
Yeah, he sees him on tv.
Chris Christie
The greatest compliment he feels like he can give to anyone, which he said about Pete Hegseth, for instance, was he's out of central casting. And so for anybody to think that this is anything other than that, but with real life ramifications, has not watched him over this period of time. Now, there will be things that he will do that I will agree with philosophically. But the problem for me is I cannot rationalize away the character mistakes, the pettiness, the vindictiveness and all the rest of it by saying, yeah, but I agree with him on what he's doing on Fill in the Blank, whatever it might be. And that's where you have a lot of Republicans right now are. Are rationalizing it that way. Well, I agree with his. I don't like him and I disagree with him personally, but I feel like I agree with many of his policies, so I'll be with him. The problem is that he does things like this, pulls the security detail from Mike Pompeo. Now that is nothing but pettiness and vindictiveness colored with absolute mortal danger.
Jon Stewart
Right.
Chris Christie
Here's Pompeo as CIA director and Secretary of State, who executes an order from the Commander in Chief in alignment with our system and gets Soleimani assassinated. The Iranians now say we're going to kill Pompeo and a couple of other folks too. John Bolton, Brian Hook. And as a result, the intelligence community says we need to give these guys security because they didn't jump through hoops to support Donald Trump. He's now pulled it and said, hey, they have money, they could buy their own security. Well, that may or may not be true. I don't know the financial circumstances of those three guys. But what I will tell you is having had public security and private security, public security is much better because they have access to intelligence, they have access to information that private security guys just don't have. To me, that's the essence of the problem here, is that no matter what he may do from a policy perspective that you agree or disagree with, he will always revert back to pettiness, vindictiveness.
Jon Stewart
He will always take the cruelest option he can possibly come up with.
Chris Christie
Absolutely right.
Jon Stewart
So that brings us to, and I'm cognizant of your time and I really do appreciate you being here. And this will sort of bring us back around to the end. When I look at that, his pettiness or his cruelty or his, his, his comfort in, in chaos, I feel like the arguments against him have been litigated now for 10 years through the public and through the courts. You know, we've gone through 10, 12 years of he's terrible, he's a threat to democracy, he's an autocrat. And Americans saw that. They saw January 6th, they saw everything. They saw the convictions, the felonies and they went, yeah, we're good with that. Not only are we good with that, we're better with that than we were the last time. And we've talked a little bit about, you know, your idea that Republicans have shown their character by not in any way standing up to that aspect of it, even if they might agree with them philosophically on certain areas. So now let's talk about the Democrats, because this is the team I consider my team and I feel they are utterly rudderless. They've litigated the he's an autocrat and he's a dick argument. It hasn't gone anywhere. And it seems like they are utterly unprepared for this onslaught and are still just shouting autocracy rather than, look, this guy walked into office with a Project 2025 book. This is a 50 to 60 year project they've been working on. How is it that the Democrats are so flat footed here and where is their counter to that idea that Americans feel left out of the government. Why are they just status quoing it? Why are they just sending out Chuck Schumer to put his glasses down by his nose, to look down and read a statement in as flat a monotone as you could possibly muster about the existential danger we face of this autocrat and then like take a quick call from his kid and laugh about my grandson lost a tooth. And then he goes back to like, why is Obama, you know, laughing with him at a thing is it all feels performative. And what is the actual. Where's the book that says this is what the relationship with the government is and here's how we're going to fix fix it.
Chris Christie
First off, I'd say they overplayed and over litigated the character things on Trump, especially in the 24 campaign. The people who were not gonna vote for Donald Trump on the character issues already determined they're not gonna vote for Donald Trump. The people that the Democrats had to persuade were the people you and I were just talking about who said like, look, I get that, but, but the government sucks and you guys are running it and it sucks. And what's your answer to that? And neither Biden nor Harris during this last cycle had an answer to that, nor did Chuck Schumer nor any of the rest of them. Cuz their answer to all that was yeah, yeah, but Trump will be worse. Well, you know what they figured out? People went, nah, maybe not, because you guys aren't giving me an alternative. And I think that the problem is that there is two things going on inside the Democratic Party. There is an unresolved conflict within the Democratic Party, from the very progressive wing of the party to the more traditional Democrats about who's gonna run the show and who's gonna write the playbook. They haven't resolved that problem and they all papered it over. And you gotta have the fight inside the Democratic Party to what is it that we stand for governmentally? What do we believe in? What would we do for people to deal with that disconnect and the discontent that's going on? They haven't answered those questions.
Jon Stewart
But the Republicans are very good at. They've lined up a lot of their think tanks with their media, with their political arms. They have fights too. They've got a Freedom Caucus, like right now. The Democratic strategy appears to be, let's hope Chip Roy is so fucking crazy that he'll just stand up and make it impossible for the House to pass anything. Rather than, you can't just Tell people to steer away from that crash. You have to give them a direction to drive into. And I know that's being reductive, but they don't seem to have that same infrastructure or leadership.
Chris Christie
You're right. They don't right now. And that's the problem with having gone back to Biden. Going back to Biden in 20 was a reaction to Trump. It was like, okay, he's the guy who will be least offensive and will make Trump the focus.
Jon Stewart
But he won.
Chris Christie
I mean, well, but won what? Then he came in the president. Right, But. No, but, John. One, this is what I mean. That, like, when he got there, he started to go much more progressive than he had talked about during the campaign.
Jon Stewart
Oh, I don't. I mean, if. If your idea is like, the Democrats lost because Biden was too progressive, I would.
Chris Christie
No, no, let me finish the thought.
Jon Stewart
All right.
Chris Christie
It was cognitively dissonant for people. They didn't believe that's who Biden was either outside the party or inside the party. So he got the worst of both worlds. The people inside the party who were progressive never trusted him. They didn't think he was one of them. The people outside the party who were more moderate said, son of a bitch, he lied to us. He is a progressive. He got absolutely sandwiched politically, and now no one knew who he was. And the worst thing in politics to be, Jon, is to be perceived to be inauthentic. And Trump's power is that people believe what he believes, what he says, which.
Jon Stewart
Is entirely the opposite of what reality is. He's a guy who says, I'm the free. Free speech is back. And by the way, somebody should remove MSNBC from the air and cbs, and I'm gonna sue everybody. Like, it's incoherent.
Chris Christie
Correct. I totally agree that he is a transactional speaker. Right. Whatever gets him. You know the old song, whatever gets you through the night For Trump, that's the way he speaks all the time. Whatever gets him through this moment. But my point on the Democrats is they were in the worst possible space they could be. They didn't have a game plan, as you mentioned, an offering to the American people substantively, and they were viewed as inauthentic. Well, shit, what's gonna happen then? People want common sense. They want a common sense, articulated alternative to what they're being presented with. And in the absence of one, they'll vote for the group that they think looks most authentic. Now, the challenge for Republicans to not make it seem like it's gonna be all like hearts and flowers. And it's gonna be easy when you've got a three or four vote majority in the House. 2. Right now, everybody's a king. And whatever's happening right now, remember, it's all been executive orders. Not a thing has happened through Congress.
Jon Stewart
He's basically nullified them right at the moment.
Chris Christie
But he's not gonna be able to do that on the tax law. He's not gonna be able to do that on real substantive changes to immigration.
Jon Stewart
But don't you think reconciliation allows him much more leeway through the Senate? I mean, he's gonna push everything to reconciliation.
Chris Christie
It does through the Senate. But in the House, here's his problem on reconciliation. There is a large group of Republicans, and by large, I mean Chippewa, 25 to 30, that are gonna say, like, hey, we're not increasing the debt ceiling in March unless there is significant reductions in government spending.
Jon Stewart
See, here's where I think he's going to get around that. And I truly believe this. I think they're being really shrewd about this. I think they actually are going to be ruthless in cutting spending. And I think you're seeing that now with the freeze on everything else. Like, I think he's, I think he's calculated that into their project. I think these guys, again, they've thought this through. They have a game plan. In my mind, this really is. And maybe it's just because it's my team. I'm so frustrated with their inability to mount any coherent opposition other than I'm telling my lawyer, we're telling our lawyers to file an injunction. And I mean, come on, guys, this is autocracy. And it goes back to the only path I see out of this really dark tunnel that we're in. And I do feel like it's dark and going to get darker is to. To. They have to have at least one of the handles of power. And to get that, they have to present a convincing, authentic, coherent and. And directed and led vision. Not of I'm a progressive, I'm a conservative, I'm a thing, I'm a that of how to make this thing work, how to make it work for people to agilely respond. They're paying money in. What are they getting back and what does that mean to their lives? And if they can't do that, we're royally fucked. That is the premise.
Chris Christie
You should be extraordinarily disappointed in your team and what. And the lack of any coherent, saleable, authentic plan. I totally agree with you. And, but remember this Games are both offense and defense.
Jon Stewart
Uh oh, now you're talking about. Now this is all bringing it back to sports radio, baby. Let's go offense and defense.
Chris Christie
It's exactly right. We're going to get on F a n any moment now.
Jon Stewart
There you go.
Chris Christie
Look, it all comes back to offense and defense. There are big expectations on the Republicans to deliver on a bunch of the stuff they're talking about. And for instance, when you talk about significant cuts in spending, when you only have a two or three vote majority, there are a lot of moderate Republicans from New York, Illinois, California, who are gonna have a hard time voting for some of those things. And let us not forget the premise of what I've mentioned before. What they care about the most is keeping the title, John. And the title is kept for them by the people back at home, not by the people in Washington. So the challenge for Republicans and for Trump is gonna be can he muscle this through and have them basically say, you're gonna have to sacrifice your career for what I wanna get done here? And I gotta tell you something, I haven't seen that type of political courage outta any of them because they're unwilling to stand up and do those things. So Democrats, though, if they're counting just on that to get them over the finish line to getting a handle of power in either the House or the Senate, I think they're gonna be sorely disappointed. They have to do both. They have to hope that the Republicans make strategic mistakes in that regard, but they gotta come up with a plan that is authentic and genuine, that people in the center of this country, and I mean the philosophical center of this country can say, I agree with that. Yeah, no, that doesn't offend me. And they don't have that right now. And you're right about Chuck Schumer. I mean, if you could have a worse salesman to put up next to Trump, I don't know that it's possible right now. I think Hakeem Jeffries is a little more politically skilled than Schumer. Of course that's a low bar, but nonetheless, I think he's a little more skilled than him at getting Pelosi out of there would be a real help. Because rightly or wrongly, and you know, people have a certain perception of her in the middle of the philosophical middle of the country. That's not positive. So the fact is that Democrats have to change the cast. If we're gonna go back to the TV show analogy, they gotta change the cast and they gotta get some better writers for the script. Because they don't have that now. And here's what's frustrating for a guy.
Jon Stewart
Like, perhaps if they opened up the hiring to see how we tied it all around, I would tell you, ta da.
Chris Christie
This is really one of those that people say, wow, those two guys really get it. To me, John, the frustrating thing for somebody like me is like, as governor, I tried to be this way. I try to be practical and consistent and sometimes you're gonna like it and sometimes you aren't. But my job is to run this thing and to get it to work as best as I possibly can get it to work. And I don't think anybody's thinking about it that way right now. They're all thinking about it from a political advantage, a chess or checkers, depending upon the level of intellect that's going on in this stuff.
Jon Stewart
And look, and I think ultimately you as a governor, I think ultimately what's going to happen is the states are going to have to. The system is still federalist, and I think we're gonna see power returning to some of the states. And I think you're going to see governors profiles raised within that. And I think they're gonna come up with really creative solutions to protect the people most vulnerable to a lot of the shit that's going down. And someone. I have faith that someone may not rise out of the legislative arms of the party, but out of the executive arms of the party. You may start to see some changes made and some things come up. But ultimately, I really appreciate you taking the time to talk with us today and giving the insights into what you were given. So thank you for being here.
Chris Christie
No, John, my pleasure. Always happy to come back. And I'd say as things go along here, because. Because it's gonna change. It's gonna change.
Jon Stewart
No, I know.
Chris Christie
And I would say there are not many people out there who know Trump as well as I've gotten to know him over time and been someone who he said was the greatest governor in America and now is the worst sob.
Jon Stewart
And he's not hyperbolic at all, and.
Chris Christie
The worst now I'm the worst SOB in the world. And every cruel beam he could send out, he does. And I never believed it when he said I was the greatest. And I don't believe it now. I'm calling balls and strikes here because I know him well. And I will say one thing, if I can, about the governors, please. I say to my kids all the time when they accuse me of being biased on something, I say, okay, I'm biased, but it doesn't mean I'm wrong. And I'm biased about governors because they're the ones who have to give practical results, not the people in Congress. Like, they have to actually, like, plow the snow. They have to, like, do things that run the schools, do all the things that need to be done. And I do think that you're gonna see a lot of people on both parties emerge from the governor's ranks to try to set a different path and a more creative path and a more practical path. And hopefully it's the right ones who emerge. There's good ones and bad ones.
Jon Stewart
Well, we'll have you name those next time.
Chris Christie
Well, that's right. That's good. That's a little preview. You know, this is also showbiz. Look at you. You're giving a little preview for my next appearance. John.
Jon Stewart
It's a teaser. It's a teaser.
Chris Christie
Very nice. Very nice.
Jon Stewart
Yeah. That's what I do well.
Chris Christie
And I believe that's really important for us to focus on that everything in this country doesn't happen in Washington, and that in state capitals all over this country, you can make a real difference in people's lives. And I'd argue probably a more direct and substantive difference at that level than ever happens in Washington. Cause they're all scared of their own shadows and want to just protect their title. They want to be called congressman and senator forever.
Jon Stewart
Get that good health care. That's what they're in there for.
Chris Christie
You know, it's not bad, John.
Jon Stewart
Right?
Chris Christie
From what I'm told. Never been there.
Jon Stewart
Chris Christie, former governor of New Jersey. Thank you so much. Presidential candidate. And we really do appreciate you coming on today.
Chris Christie
Mr. Jersey, there you go. Good to. Good to be on. Good to be on with you. I appreciate it, John.
Jon Stewart
Beautiful. Thanks, Mike. Chris Christie, I want to thank him very much for the conversation. For those of you who didn't see. Before we got started in the conversation, we talked about Mets, and I don't think I've ever seen him as animated. I think that's the key, is you bring up the Mets, and Chris Christie goes. So I want to also point a quick note. We taped a separate little piece talking about an Afghan resettlement program for allies of the United States who had been in Afghanistan who are having trouble now with the program that was set up to get them into the United States safely. And we talked to Sean Van Diver, who is heading up a program called Afghan Evac, about the status of that program. You can check that out as well. I think we're going to put that out as a separate piece so as rather not to make your podcast listen as as long as I don't know how. I don't know how far your car ride is is what I'm trying to say to you. I don't know how, how this goes. So anyway, we appreciate you sticking with the program, listening to it. Please keep sending all your your suggestions and such and we'll check you out next week. As always, lead producer Lauren Walker. Producer Brittany Mametovic, Vidi editor and engineer Rob Votolo. Audio editor and engineer Nicole Boyce, Researcher and associate producer Jillian Spear. And our executive producers Chris McShane and Katie Gray. Thank you guys so much. Could not, could not do this thing without all their hard work. Really appreciate it and we'll see you next week. Boy. The weekly show with Jon Stewart is a Comedy Central podcast. It's produced by Paramount Audio and Busboy Productions. Welcome to the oil business.
Chris Christie
Billy Bob Thornton, Demi Moore and Jon Hamm star in a new Paramount plus original series. The world has already convinced itself that you are evil, and I am evil for providing them the one thing they interact with every day. You're all right. Here we go. From Taylor Sheridan, executive producer of Yellowstone. Get everybody back.
Jon Stewart
You just put a giant bullseye on this place. We rolled the dice one last time. Landman New series now streaming exclusively on Paramount plus. I don't want to get promoted. I want to stay charmingly insubordinate.
Chris Christie
I'm okay.
Jon Stewart
Now streaming. Let's do this.
Chris Christie
Am I catching it?
Jon Stewart
Now prepare for an adventure. I know these guys. They're super nice.
Chris Christie
Hey, what's up, my man? Five seasons in the making.
Jon Stewart
Woo. God damn it. This is terrible.
Chris Christie
This keeps getting cooler by the second. Star Trek lower decks Final season now streaming. Paramount podcasts.
Summary of "The Cons & Cons of Trump with Gov. Chris Christie"
Podcast Information:
Introduction
In this compelling episode of The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart, former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie joins host Jon Stewart to dissect the multifaceted impact of former President Donald Trump on American politics. The conversation spans Trump's character, the evolving dynamics within the Republican and Democratic parties, the role of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, and the broader implications for American democracy.
Donald Trump's Character and Political Impact
Jon Stewart opens the discussion by highlighting the enduring presence of Donald Trump in the political landscape, noting the confusion and chaos his leadership has fostered. He remarks:
“President Trump has been president forever or an hour. The confusion, the chaos… has been stunning even for those expecting there to be this kind of.” ([00:55])
Chris Christie responds by affirming his earlier predictions about Trump's unchanging character, emphasizing traits like pettiness, vindictiveness, and anger:
“The underlying problem, in my view, is the pettiness, the vindictiveness, the anger. All those things will inform much of what he does, and it's going to lead to big problems, I think, in the country over the long term.” ([04:04])
Christie reflects on his long-term acquaintance with Trump, spanning 23 years, and discusses how personal experiences shaped his perception:
“...things like pettiness, vindictiveness and all the rest of it by saying, yeah, but I agree with him on what he's doing… But he will always revert back to pettiness, vindictiveness.” ([52:07])
DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) Debate
A significant portion of the conversation delves into the contentious issue of DEI initiatives in governmental and organizational hiring practices. Jon Stewart challenges the notion that DEI undermines meritocracy, arguing that diversity introduces varied skill sets and resilience to institutions:
“DEI is not rigging it in a different direction, it's unrigging it.” ([32:05])
Chris Christie counters by asserting that while diversity itself doesn't negate merit, the implementation of DEI in some cases leads to predetermined hiring outcomes:
“Legacy admissions predetermine the outcome that there have been some in charge of government… predetermined outcomes and said, I am going to have this many African Americans, this many Latinos, this many Asians...” ([34:21])
The dialogue underscores the tension between promoting diversity and maintaining merit-based standards, with both hosts acknowledging the complexities involved.
The State of the Democratic Party
Christie critiques the Democratic Party's strategy, particularly their focus on character attacks against Trump without offering substantive alternatives to address public discontent with government inefficiency:
“They overplayed and overlitigated the character things on Trump... People went, nah, maybe not, because you guys aren't giving me an alternative.” ([56:10])
He points out internal conflicts within the party between its progressive and traditional wings, leading to a lack of cohesive policy statements:
“There is an unresolved conflict within the Democratic Party... They haven't answered those questions.” ([56:49])
Jon Stewart echoes this sentiment, noting the Democrats' failure to present a clear and authentic vision to voters dissatisfied with the current government:
“...the Democrats are totally unprepared for this onslaught... they don't seem to have that same infrastructure or leadership.” ([56:49])
The State of the Republican Party
The discussion transitions to the Republican Party's current dynamics, highlighting divisions such as the influence of the Freedom Caucus and the challenges posed by maintaining a unified front:
“There's a large group of Republicans, and by large, I mean Chippewa, 25 to 30, that are gonna say…” ([60:20])
Christie emphasizes the lack of political courage among Republicans to stand up against Trump's chaotic style, fearing career repercussions:
“...people are unwilling to stand up and do those things.” ([62:27])
Jon Stewart criticizes the Republicans' strategy of leveraging think tanks and media to consolidate support while neglecting to offer viable policy alternatives:
“They have lined up a lot of their think tanks with their media... but they don't have a game plan.” ([56:49])
Government Efficiency and Autocracy Concerns
A central theme revolves around concerns that Trump's leadership style undermines the federal government's responsiveness and injects autocratic tendencies into American democracy. Jon Stewart voices his fear that Trump’s enjoyment of chaos could erode the foundational checks and balances:
“...the last bulwark is the consent of the governed. Right. He has that.” ([43:55])
Chris Christie concurs, pointing out the failure of elected officials to effectively check presidential power:
“The people we've handed the keys to operate the system, not just the executive branch, but in the legislative branch, are not doing their job...” ([46:11])
They discuss how Trump's management style, likened to running an empire, poses unprecedented challenges to the traditional American governmental framework.
Role of Governors and State Responses
Christie highlights the importance of state-level governance in addressing federal inefficiencies. He advocates for governors to adopt practical and creative solutions to local problems, thereby mitigating some of the systemic issues exacerbated at the federal level:
“I'd argue probably a more direct and substantive difference at that level than ever happens in Washington.” ([67:55])
Jon Stewart expresses optimism that governors might rise to prominence, offering innovative approaches to protect vulnerable populations and improve governance:
“I have faith that someone may not rise out of the legislative arms of the party, but out of the executive arms of the party.” ([65:30])
Closing Thoughts
In their concluding remarks, both hosts reflect on the critical need for authentic leadership and coherent policy-making to navigate the tumultuous political climate. Christie emphasizes the importance of governors as pragmatic leaders who can effect tangible change:
“...they have to present a convincing, authentic, coherent and directed vision.” ([62:18])
Jon Stewart reiterates the urgency of addressing the systemic challenges and calls for constructive alternatives that resonate with the broader American populace:
“If they can't do that, we're royally fucked. That is the premise.” ([60:02])
The episode ends with a hopeful note, suggesting that state-level initiatives and strong gubernatorial leadership could serve as catalysts for positive change amidst federal discord.
Notable Quotes with Timestamps
Jon Stewart: “President Trump has been president forever or an hour. The confusion, the chaos… has been stunning even for those expecting there to be this kind of.” ([00:55])
Chris Christie: “The underlying problem, in my view, is the pettiness, the vindictiveness, the anger. All those things will inform much of what he does, and it's going to lead to big problems, I think, in the country over the long term.” ([04:04])
Jon Stewart: “DEI is not rigging it in a different direction, it's unrigging it.” ([32:05])
Chris Christie: “Legacy admissions predetermine the outcome that there have been some in charge of government… predetermined outcomes and said, I am going to have this many African Americans, this many Latinos, this many Asians...” ([34:21])
Chris Christie: “They overplayed and overlitigated the character things on Trump... People went, nah, maybe not, because you guys aren't giving me an alternative.” ([56:10])
Jon Stewart: “They have lined up a lot of their think tanks with their media... but they don't have a game plan.” ([56:49])
Jon Stewart: “He has that [consent of the governed].” ([43:55])
Chris Christie: “The people we've handed the keys to operate the system, not just the executive branch, but in the legislative branch, are not doing their job...” ([46:11])
Chris Christie: “I'd argue probably a more direct and substantive difference at that level than ever happens in Washington.” ([67:55])
Jon Stewart: “If they can't do that, we're royally fucked. That is the premise.” ([60:02])
Conclusion
This episode of The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart offers an insightful exploration of the lingering effects of Donald Trump's presidency on the American political landscape. Through a candid dialogue with Gov. Chris Christie, the discussion navigates the complexities of party dynamics, the contentious DEI debate, concerns about governmental autocracy, and the pivotal role of state leadership in fostering change. The conversation underscores the urgent need for authentic, coherent leadership to address the nation's challenges and restore faith in its democratic institutions.