
Reproductive rights journalist Rebecca Grant joins us to trace the real history of abortion access, demystify today’s “abortion underground,” and make a data-driven case for why choice isn’t a side note — it’s the whole definition of woman’s work.
Loading summary
A
I don't know about you, but the women in my life We've got questions about our hormones, mood swings out of nowhere, weight gain that makes no sense, a sex drive that went MIA or really missing without action, wide awake at 3am, exhausted all day, and we refuse to accept that not feeling like yourself is just part of getting older. And yet no one knows where to actually get help. Enter hers. The process is simple and doesn't involve long waits or being dismissed in a cold exam room. You can start today by completing a medical intake online and a licensed provider trained in women's health will review your information and create your personalized treatment plan. You'll also get the HERS app and unlimited messaging with their Care team. It should be simpler to access healthcare built around you and your unique needs. Whether you want to manage your perimenopause or menopause symptoms, lose weight, grow thicker, fuller hair, or find relief for anxiety, hers has women covered. Visit f o R-H-E-R s.com womanswork to get a personalized perimenopause treatment plan that's right for you. That's f o r h e-r s.com womanswork not available in all 50 states. Perimenopause and menopause by hers includes hormonal health support, educational resources, digital tools and prescription options if appropriate. Hormone replacement therapies are not FDA approved for the treatment of perimenopause but may be prescribed off label for perimenopausal symptoms at a provider discretion. See website for full details, important safety information and restrictions.
B
And Doug Here we have the Limu Emu in its natural habitat, helping people customize their car insurance and save hundreds with Liberty Mutual. Fascinating. It's accompanied by his natural ally, Doug.
A
Limu is that guy with the binoculars watching us.
B
Cut the camera. They see us. Only pay for what you need@liberty mutual.com Liberty Liberty Liberty Liberty Savings Very unwritten by Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. Affiliates excludes Massachusetts.
A
I am Nicole Khalil and you are listening to the this Is Woman's Work podcast. We're together. We're redefining what it means, what it looks and feels like to be doing woman's work in the world today with you as the decider. And that's the tricky part, right? You being the decider. For you. Because baked into this mission is the commitment to choice. Whatever feels true and real and right for you is how you do woman's work. Which means if I'm serious about this mission, I have to allow for someone else's choice to be the opposite of mine and still honor it as right and real and true for them. And while I definitely have my own beliefs and strong opinions, while there are things that feel so obvious and fundamental to me, if I really mean it when I say you are the decider, then I have to leave space for someone else to choose differently, even if it's the opposite of what I would choose. And friend, that ain't easy. Honestly, it's a battle for me. My ego likes to think that it knows best. My righteousness can be very convincing, and I wrestle with whether giving room for multiple truths is the easy way out or the hardest thing I've ever tried to do. But here's what I believe Reproductive freedom, the right to decide if, when and how to become a parent, is the clearest, sharpest measure of whether women in any society actually have choice and equity. For me, it's the metaphorical hill I'm willing to die on. Though to be clear, I really hope it doesn't come to that. And if you're listening, I have to believe that we want some version of the same thing. Choice and equity. We may disagree on the definitions or the path to get there, but I hope you'll listen with an open mind. And if you already agree with me, I hope you'll listen with an open heart. Because our ranting, finger pointing memes and rage comments, they may not be serving the very cause we hold dear. The issue may feel simple, but solving it requires complexity, nuance, empathy, listening. You know, those soft skills that are actually the hardest ones. So maybe today's guest will disagree with everything I just said, and I am wildly open to that because she's the expert. She's been living this reporting on this for years. Rebecca Grant is a freelance journalist and author who has spent more than a decade reporting on reproductive rights, health and justice. Her work has appeared just about everywhere, from this American Life and New York Magazine to the Atlantic, Elle, and npr. She's the author of Three Mothers, nine Months and Pregnancy in America and her latest book, Inside the Abortion underground and the 60 year battle for Reproductive Freedom is a definitive, eye opening history of the movement for reproductive freedom across generations and borders. Rebecca's work centers on the bravery, ingenuity and determination of women who have fought for autonomy and it serves as both a chronicle and a rallying cry for the work we have ahead. So Rebecca, thank you for being here and I would love if you could just give us a quick overview. And I know this is not A quick thing, but how we got here, the history of reproductive freedom leading up to this point in time.
B
I got on the beat in 2015, and so that was actually a really interesting time to be starting out as a reporter covering abortion kind of specifically, but also reproductive rights more broadly. And, you know, I talk about this in the foreword of my book, where I had just become a full time freelancer. And I knew that I wanted to specialize, I knew I wanted to focus on a beat, and I knew that I wanted it to be reproductive rights, abortion.
A
And.
B
And I had this moment where I was talking with an older male editor at a magazine who kind of said to me, like, I don't know if that's enough of a beat. I don't know if there's the relevancy, I don't know if there's the urgency. It feels like settled law. It feels like this is not, you know, a kind of dynamic situation with ongoing 10, you know, blah, blah, blah. And I really disagreed with that, clearly. Cause I've spent the past 10 years.
A
Well, and because we are where we are today, right?
B
Of course. And because we are where we are. And so I think that the moment when I entered the beat, in a sense, was a moment of complacency, but also of transition. Because since the midterms in 2010, which were sort of like the Tea Party wave, there was this huge trend of anti abortion laws, of abortion restrictions passing all over the country. They were known as TRAP laws, targeted restriction of abortion providers. And so it was basically laws that were geared at making it as hard as possible for abortion providers to continue doing their work. So examples of those laws could be ambulatory surgical center requirements, which would say that an abortion clinic has to have, like, the hallways be a certain width so that a stretcher or gurney can go through, even though complications were exceedingly rare. Or admitting privilege requirements, which said that clinics or providers had to have backup at a hospital, even though, again, complications are rare, and that hospitals in their emergency rooms were required to take emergency patients anyway. So all of these laws were not actually about promoting women's health and safety. They were about making it harder to provide abortion care. And I think that there was this sort of underestimation of how pernicious those laws can be and of the impact that they were having. And so clinics were struggling. In some cases, they were closing down. It was getting harder and harder for patients to access care. And so it did. To me, it felt like this crisis, but it also sort of felt like one that was maybe not widely understood to be a crisis. And then the 2016 election happened, and all of a sudden people were really paying attention to and worried about the fate of reproductive rights. And so I think that, you know, obviously there's like a whole bunch of milestone and watershed moments that have occurred that I document in the book. And one of the things that I really enjoyed doing was, you know, both following them forward from that point as I had traced them over the course of my career. So, you know, in 2016, there was also a Supreme Court case that kind of upheld abortion rights and access to abortion. So there's just been these wild swings. But then it was also this opportunity to go back in history and to kind of understand even more deeply how we got here. So looking at the movement that kind of helped lead to Roe v. Wade in the 70s, but then also how once that legal decision happened, there were immediately efforts to roll back abortion rights. And so it wasn't necessary. You know, I feel like the history is so. In some ways. Well, I don't know, it's not linear like it. There's been these ebbs and these flows, and then there's been this kind of tendency, I think, to. To not believe or. I think there was this tendency even among people who work in the movement that, like Roe will never be lost. We will have this. And so I think for many people, the 2022 decision that overturned Roe Dobbs vs Jackson, Women's Health Organization was a wake up call for a lot people. And, you know, in many ways it's been incredibly devastating and catastrophic for so many reasons. And I also think it has in some ways transformed the reproductive rights movement, the abortion access movement. I mean, it really has affected the landscape for activists and people who care about this issue kind of on all sides.
A
And I definitely want to delve into that. I do have a couple questions I'm trying to. I don't know. The way I had of framed this in my mind is to try to stick to some of the history and the facts, at least on the onset, because I do have very strong opinions about this and I don't want this show or this episode to become about my opinion. So when we talk about history of abortion first, when we go way, way, way, way, way back, abortion has always been a thing. Is that a fair statement to make?
B
Absolutely. And there's so many examples across cultures, from all of these different traditions, all these different moments in history of the techniques that people used, whether they were lay people, individuals, whether they were part of A healing tradition. And in some cases there are commonalities. And, you know, there was sort of this, like this ancient Egyptian text, for instance, which is frequently referenced and that I reference in the book that talks about a particular kind of, like, I don't know, concoction, I guess you could say, that people used as an abortifacient. And there were kind of medical professionals who looked at it and they thought, oh, like there are reasons to think that this might actually been effective. And there are certain plants, you know, a lot of sort of these herbal traditions that will pop up. I mean, obviously it varies some depending on the particular place that you're talking about. But for a long, long, long, long, long time, the idea of ending a pregnancy before what was called the moment of quickening, which is sort of around the time that someone can first feel a fetus move, that wasn't considered an abortion, like we today. And there were all of these euphemisms that were used. I mean, I kind of mostly focused on the ones in the US but it was this idea of bringing back your period, restoring the menses. Like it was sort of this idea of regulating this natural menstrual cycle rather than thinking of it as ending a pregnancy. And so this idea that, you know, abortion or early abortion or whatever it is has always been this really abu wrong thing is absolutely untrue. I mean, in the 19th century in America, there was this concerted effort to make it a thing, but it hadn't been. And there were plenty of tradespeople of kind of, you know, early pharmaceutical compounders or healers from different traditions back before medicine in the US Was formalized, who would advertise in newspapers and they would use euphemisms like some of the ones I was talking about before. But I mean, they were openly saying, you know, if you've missed a couple periods, like, here's this thing that can help bring it back. And so it's absolutely true that abortion has always existed. It will always exist. As long as there are people who can get pregnant, there will be people who don't want to be pregnant and will look for a solution to figure out how not to be. And the question is how easy it is for them to do that, how safe it is for them to do that, how effective whatever tools that they're using are. But it's not like the idea that you could ever get rid of abortion is just. I mean, it's. It's just not true.
A
I mean, that aligns with what I believe is the idea that this will ever stop as asinine. And again, correct me if I'm wrong, my understanding was religion and seeing it as ending a pregnancy or killing a baby is sort of a newer concept. This started more in the middle of the last century where it became so much of a talking point as we see today. Again, is that fair? Is that accurate?
B
Yeah, absolutely. You know, religious leaders were a major part of the movement for abortion in the late 60s and in the early 70s. And there, I mean, there's a number of examples of this, but one of them is that there was an organization, kind of a network, a nationwide network called the Clergy Consultation Service on Abortion, which was a network of clergy members from across states who were part of this kind of referral network, I guess you could say, where they would talk with their constituents, I don't know if that's the right word for that. That makes it sound political. But they would talk with people who were from their religious communities who came to them, and they would refer them to safe and vetted abortion providers. They would help them find it. And they were pretty vocal about why this was important and stepping up and seeing that as a calling. And I mean, I remember reading some piece of history about how, like, the Southern Baptist Convention had been, you know, not opposed to abortion during that time. And so I think a lot of that, that shift and that deep connection between religion, but really specifically certain strains, I think, of, of Christianity and opposition to abortion, those really didn't become as closely tethered as we think of them being today until the 80s. And it was a kind of a concerted or maybe late 70s, but it was a concerted effort to link those things together.
A
Okay, now, and I don't know if we can do this, but when we strip away the politics and the opinions of today, what are some basic facts that people need to know about abortion access right now?
B
I think the biggest thing that has changed, that feels the most relevant and kind of sailing it right now, is about the access, the arrival of medication, abortion, of abortion pills. And so certainly, you know, I will say up front, abortion, pills, medication, abortion is not a good option for everyone. There are people who have contraindications. There are people who. That's not their preferred method for whatever reason of managing it. And I believe that all of those people deserve access to, you know, clinical care, in clinic care, whatever procedure is best for them with the medical oversight to the degree that they want it like that absolutely is true. However, there's also no doubting that the arrival of medication Abortion has completely transformed what the landscape of abortion access looks like. And that's not only true in the US but it's true abroad. And I would say that the, the radical potential of medication abortion we really saw internationally before we even saw that in the U.S. and so, you know, before the Dobbs decision, or maybe even before COVID medication abortion was not like the majority method. It wasn't sort of the most common method. And it has been steadily, steadily climbing, and it has surged in the wake of the Dobbs decision and during COVID when the FDA's laws on telemedicine abortion changed. So in the US for a long time you couldn't access the medication outside of a clinic. So all of the barriers that were involved in visiting a clinic were just as true for accessing the abortion pills. During COVID the FDA changed its rules saying that it could be mailed. And so for the first time in the U.S. people were able to access medication abortion mailed to their home, and they could appreciate the convenience, the privacy, the discretion, the kind of control that they had over the process. And I think that that has really shaped in many ways what the post ops landscape has looked like. So there are organizations that are protected by shield laws, which are states that, laws that blue states have passed that basically say we will protect abortion providers who serve clinic serve patients who are out of state. And certainly there have been many legal efforts trying to prosecute those doctors or bring civil claims against them or stop them from doing that work. But part of the impact of shield laws has been that abortion has gone up since the Dobbs decision. There have been more abortions each year since Dobbs than there were before that. And so I think that ultimately it's the availability of the pills and of course, sort of the existence of them that's really shaping what abortion access looks like today. I mean, I think it's now 1 in 4 abortions happens via telemedicine. And so, you know, certainly there is an incredibly important and robust on the ground grassroots network of people, abortion funds, mutual aid societies, practical support groups who are helping people travel out of state and out of state travel for abortion care to brick and mortar clinics. You know, the numbers of people traveling has also surged, so that's a really important pathway as well. But, you know, I think, I mean, maybe this is just me with the specific lens of the book, but I absolutely think it's fair to say that these online sources for medication abortion are, are kind of, I think one of the most influential factors facing the access landscape right now.
A
If you're anything like me, drinking enough water every day sounds great in theory. Right up there with getting eight hours of uninterrupted sleep and folding the laundry right away. Which is why I found a smarter way to stay hydrated with Cure. Cure Hydration packs are clean and simple plant based electrolytes. No added sugar and just 25 calories. They hydrate better than water alone. And get this, they actually taste good. My favorite flavor is lemonade, but they have stick several great flavors that you can try which make drinking water feel like less of a chore. They even have a Cure hydration variety pack for kids. JJ uses them over long practices or tournament weekends. And honestly I use them then too because hauling kids around to all of their activities should qualify as a sport. Listen, staying hydrated isn't just about water. You also need electrolytes. That's why I love Cure. It's clean, tastes great, and actually works. And for this is woman's work listeners, you can get 20% off your first order at curehydration.com womanswork with code womanswork and if you get a post purchase survey, make sure to let them know you heard about CURE right here. It really helps support the show. Don't just drink more water, upgrade it with cure. So in the subtitle of your book, you call it an abortion underground. Is this contributing to that? The fact that obviously since Dobbs the regulation falls to the states and so you see more people going to other states for for care and for access. When you say abortion underground, is that what you're referring to or is there more to it than that?
B
I am referring to I think any channel that is in some way kind of defying, resisting, subverting the laws. And I'm sort of being really careful with my words there because it is 100% legal for people to travel out of state to a state where abortion is legal. So I'm really hesitant to refer to that in any way as an underground activity because it's not. And abortion funds in many states, you know, in the book I focus on one in Texas, they have gotten legal clarity. They have fought and protected that helping people travel out of state or people's right to travel out of state, those are constitutionally protected actions. But at the same time I do think that there's a resonance to this idea of the underground because before Roe, because there wasn't abortion pills back then, you know, there was nothing you could mail to people for them to self manage their abortion at home, what the underground did look like were these referral networks. It was like the clergy service I mentioned before or some of the other historical groups I talk about in the book, where most of what they were doing was finding abortion providers and helping people figure out how. Like helping people find them, figure out how to get to them, giving them ways to stay safe as they were doing it. So there were absolutely these sort of, like, pipelines and travel channels that people were following in a way that I do think is somewhat evocative of the way that out of state travel is functioning today. So again, abortion funds and the work that they do and out of state travel fully legal, but there is some connection to what the kind of the pathways were before Roe.
A
I was just going to reiterate, you know, this idea that it is absolutely legal to travel out of state and out of the country for medical care. We see people do it all the time, and even for like, what's the word? Not necessary medical care. Like, I know several people who've traveled out of state to get plastic surgery or who've gone out of the country for cancer treatment or what have you. So I think because there's this stigma around it that sometimes it seems like it's illegal, but I'm. I'm so glad that you reiterated that part.
B
Well, and I also think there's so much fear mongering around it. Right. I mean, Texas has tried to pass these kind of highway laws that are saying that, like, you can't travel on certain, like, local jurisdictions, like you can't trying to say you can't travel on certain roads for the purpose of accessing an abortion. So, like, there's been a lot of attempts to confuse and muddy the waters. And then with laws that say, like aid and abet if you help someone have an abortion, people are really confused on what that means. And does that include someone going out of state? So I think that it's important to recognize both the very intentional campaign of obfuscation that has happened to make people confused and scared. I mean, it's this chilling effect, right? But you can travel to a state where abortion is legal and access an abortion. The other thing that I was gonna say just about kind of with regards to the underground, is that one of the really revolutionary things that the arrival of medication abortion did, of abortion pills, is it decoupled legality and safety in a way, because it used to be that illegal abortion was synonymous with unsafe abortion. And so a lot of what the activism was was trying to make illegal abortion safer in the years before Roe. But it was dangerous, right? I mean, there were unscrupulous provider, there were unhygienic conditions, people could get robbed or sexually assaulted as they accessed abortion care. There were so many complications from unsafe abortion that hospitals had wards called infected ob. But medication abortion is extremely safe and effective. Decades and decades of research shows this. And it's safe and effective when people manage it outside of a clinical environment. And so what that has meant is that you can access an illegal abortion safely. And it has meant that there are countries that have abortion bans where abortion is actually pretty accessible. And it has meant that there are countries where abortion is legal, but because of kind of the whole regulatory infrastructure around it, it's more difficult to access. And so it really changed all of these boundaries and these category lines. And there are all of these examples which I chart in the book of countries of activists and countries that have used medication, abortion and different ways of helping people, you know, access it and figure out how to take it safely, that have then gone on to change the laws. I think Argentina is a great example of this. Ireland is a great example of this, where there was a way in which medication abortion was so ubiquitous, even though it wasn't legal, that it led to, it led to legal change and so bringing that kind of to the U.S. i think that, you know, an organ like the shield law providers, like I was talking about before, an organization like Aid Access, which is the largest kind of network of shield law providers, again, you know, this term underground, does it apply to them? They're certified prescribers, prescribing FDA approved medication. Everything they're doing is above board, but they are challenging abortion bans. And I do think that there's sort of an underground component to that insofar as kind of underground to me evokes this mode of, of resistance. And then I guess the final category are these community support networks, which I think you could solidly refer to them as underground, because these are really people who are sourcing the medication outside of FDA approved channels. They have their own supply chain and people can contact them through an encrypted kind of contact form requesting the medication and they will mail it to them for free. And so that really is kind of, I think, the way that these modern underground networks, in sort of the purest sense of the word underground are operating. Which is to say, like there's no, you know, it's outside of these legal boundaries.
A
This is all fascinating and obviously medication is making a big difference, but there are going to be people or circumstances where we will still need clinics or doctors to perform abortions. How do we make sure that that remains a priority while also supporting a safe and easier option?
B
You know, doctors will always be necessary. Abortion providers, brick and mortar clinics will always be necessary. I mean, there are those reasons that I touched on before of why medication isn't a good option for everyone. But then there's also people who have complications later in pregnancy that are threatening to the maternal healthcare or there's some sort of a fetal abnormality that comes up on a scan. Right. And so, I mean, even people who are very much having wanted pregnancies will encounter situations or complications in which the care that is needed to save their lives or preserve their fertility or are necessary for them to make the best decision for their family is abortion care. And people can, you know, sometimes this can sort of get semantic, but miscarriage management is abortion care. It's the same. And so I think that something that's so important to understand is that abortion bans make pregnancy more dangerous for everyone. And there are all of these lawsuits. I mean, there was a really kind of a big one in Texas that was helmed by a plaintiff named Amanda Zerwaski, I hope I'm saying her name right, but she had a really life threatening pregnancy complication and was extremely ill. And the hospital couldn't intervene to save her life until she was, you know, how close to death's door. And that ultimately had an impact on her fertility. Her life was at risk because they couldn't intervene. She was having a wanted pregnancy. And so it's just if you have a society where people are getting pregnant, which like, again, just like with abortion, that's never not going to exist. You have to have doctors and clinics and nurses and providers who are equipped to provide this kind of care because so many people need it in lots of different situations. And I think that, you know, ultimately we, as I talk about in my first book, we have a maternal health crisis in this country already. Maternal mortality is high. There have been studies that have been happening in states with abortion bans that have looked at increased rates of maternal mortality, of infant mortality, of increased racial disparities and maternal health outcomes. All of this is being exacerbated by these abortion bans. And so, you know, I think that it's critical to have both clinics and, you know, ways to get people to them that is affordable and you know that that sort of is, is a real option for them. Right. The farther the distance are, the harder that is. That's important because I. Because people should absolutely have the choice over how they end their pregnancy. I mean, not only whether they do, but, but how. And like I said before, medication, abortion, not a good fit for everyone. But it's also important because we are always going to need clinicians who know how to provide this type of care, no matter where you are or what your belief system is. And so these kinds of laws, they put everyone's health at risk.
A
So you already answered this, but I was going to ask the question if it's true. Being a first world country, and I know a lot of Americans are proud to be American and yet this is an area where we fall behind quite a bit, right? The maternal care, the maternal deaths that are happening. We're not the best when it comes to this. Fair.
B
Absolutely. We're one of, I believe it's three or four countries and I, the last time I looked up the statistic was maybe a year or two ago. So this might be a little bit outdated, but it certainly hasn't gotten better here. So we're one of the only countries where our maternal mortality rates have been getting worse. That's pretty shocking. And so even in countries where their overall rates of maternal mortality or morbidity might be higher than ours, but their trajectory is different. Right. They're moving towards something better, which we are not. And so it's something that I think, I think so often maternal health care and abortion care are treated as some sort of like diametrically opposed thing, but they're not. They're so intimately, intricately, kind of inextricably, all the vocabulary words related. And so, you know, of course I've really been able to see that through the course of reporting both of these books. But I think that we are in the midst of a maternal health crisis that already existed but is only getting worse and has continued to get worse because of the abortion bans. I mean, in Idaho, which has one of the strictest abortion bans in the country, they've had a mass exodus of OB GYN. Something like 1 in 5 OB GYNs has left the state. Rural health, you know, rural hospitals are closing, which means that people who live in rural areas are having a harder time getting care. So it's like it's all feeding each other, you know.
A
Well, and I just want to reiterate that that makes it less safe for women to be pregnant in Idaho. That's what we're saying here, right? Like for saying that we care so much about babies and, and the care of pregnant women this is contrary. This flies in the face of all of that.
B
Absolutely. There's a. A piece of reporting that. It's not my own reporting. It was. I read it in an article and I cite it in the book. But that women in Idaho are increasingly getting airlift insurance because if they're facing a life threatening pregnancy complication, they do not trust that they will be able to get timely urgent care that they need in the state that they live. And so they're taking out extra insurance to make sure they can be airlifted someplace else. I mean, that is wild.
C
This episode is brought to you by Rakuten. The holidays are here and that means it's the most wonderful time of the year. To save with Rakuten Use Rakuten to stack cash back at your favorite stores on top of holiday sales. That's savings on savings. With Rakuten, you can get cash back on gifts for everyone on your list, from toys for the kids to kitchen gear for the person who loves to cook, to electronics for everyone. You can even save on something for yourself. Cash back is automatically added to your account as you shop and you can get paid with gift cards, PayPal or check or eligible American Express card members can choose to earn membership rewards points. Join for free today and get a new member bonus after minimum qualifying purchases. Just go to rakuten.com, download the app or install the browser extension. Terms and conditions apply.
D
We all love a legendary comeback and Degree Original Cool Rush is back and better than ever. Cool Rush isn't just a scent. It's a movement, a fan favorite that delivers bold, fresh vibes and all day sweat protection. Whether you have a man that spends hours in the gym, heads into the office early, or is just trying to stay fresh on a long day, Cool Rush has their back. Head to your local Walmart or Target and grab Degree Cool Rush, the fan favorite scent from the world's number one antiperspirant brand.
A
With the time that we have left, and you've already done a few of these, I was hoping we could challenge some of the myths. So, for example, a myth being that if we make abortion illegal that there will be less of it or none of it. And you already said this, but abortions have increased since Dobbs in 2022. We mentioned a few others that abortion care is just about people who don't want to have babies as opposed to women who have health complications or, you know, need to make the choice of how to for their own life and safety. What are a couple other myths that you would challenge based on your experience in research.
B
I think one important one is that a majority of people who have abortions, they already have children. I think there's this myth that it's sort of people, I don't know, being selfish and careless or something.
A
Right. And it's young single people who are using it as birth control as opposed to totally.
B
And, and so we, you know, from the data, we know that that's not true. I believe it's 60% of abortion patients already have a child, you know, at least one. And I also know that anecdotally. Right. I mean, over the past 10 years I've spent how many hours I've interviewed how many people about their experiences seeking abortion care. And that myth has never once been sort of anything that I have seen validated in any of that reporting. So yeah, I think that that's an important one. And I think for a lot of abortion seekers, part of their decision making process is that they want to be the best possible parent to the children that they have. And so I just think that's important to recognize that it's like it can be part of a very responsible and carefully thought out parenting choice. So I think that's important. I know I've said this, but I think another one is the idea that medication abortion is unsafe. And I'm specifically saying that because there is this ongoing. I mean, I think it was just today or maybe yesterday that the Health and Human Services department announced that they were going to be doing some sort of additional review of mifepristone, which is one of the two drugs that's part of the medication abortion regimen. And this has been something that anti abortion activists have been trying to do for a long time. They've been trying to claim that mifepristone is unsafe and that it should be reevaluated. So if a Prestonone was initially approved by the FDA in the year 2000, but it was initially approved in France in the late 80s. And so even to get it approved in the US was this decade plus long battle that I do document some in the book where there was all of this evidence about the safety and efficacy of this medication, but there was so much politics involved in getting it approved in the first place. And so it was like this huge battle and there had to be so much data about its safety to get it approved in the year 2020in the years since then, there's only been more data showing its safety and efficacy. And so the idea that it needs additional reviewer study is Ridiculous. And, you know, it's sort of like not a coincidence that I think it was like RFK Jr. Who said something about if there's new evidence, maybe then we would review mifepristone. And then I think the next day there was some conservative think tank that came out with a. A paper not scientifically valid. I mean, just. Just sort of like this URSAT scientific paper that said, oh, like, actually, here's the real data. And I mean, so there's this very concerted effort to try to claim that this medication is not safe. And that is just an absolute myth. It's not true.
A
I think the danger is that we have made this particular topic a right or left issue. And my anecdotal experience is, and I have been very fortunate to not have to have made this choice, but I have been part of several women's choice in both directions whether to have a baby or not have a baby. And what has been interesting is the women have fallen on both sides of the political spectrum. And I don't know if we can challenge this myth in a way, but this doesn't feel like a left or right issue. This feels like a choice issue. This feels like an equity issue. This feels like a freedom issue for women in society to me. Any thoughts or reactions on that?
B
Where to start? I think one is, I know that from my own reporting and life as well, that people from lots of different faith backgrounds and political backgrounds have abortions. And there's also, you know, data about this that, like people who identify as some of the religious kind of faiths that are more associated with being anti abortion, don't have fewer abortions than people from other religious backgrounds. Like there is data, there is evidence to reflect that. I also have interviewed plenty of clinical providers over the years who have treated patients who were protesting outside their clinic, came in to get an abortion, and then went back to protesting outside their clinic. And I think a thing that can happen sometimes is that people think, oh, well, I'm opposed to this in theory. And then they're faced with a situation in their own life that makes them feel differently about their own decision, I guess maybe you could say. And so ultimately, I think that it's important to remember that you can be someone who would never choose or thinks you would never choose to have an abortion. But why that means that you should generalize that to anyone else who might not feel the same way is a question that I have never gotten a good answer for. I have never been able to understand. If you oppose abortion, don't have an abortion like that feels fairly straightforward to me. But imposing that or trying to impose that or past moral judgment, judgment on other people for making a different decision. I just, I, I, I still have a hard time understanding. And I think that it's okay for it to be a complicated decision. It's okay for it to be an uncomplicated decision. I mean, there are people who just like, this is what I want, and they do it and they know it's what they need, and that's fine. There are also people who really struggle and wrestle with the decision, and that's okay too. And I think that there has been maybe within the pro choice movement or the reproductive rights movement, there has been this reluctance historically kind of to allow space for that because it seems like it's then opening the door to this narrative, I don't know, that people sort of don't really could never sort of want an abortion or it contributes to stigma. And so I think that that has made it tough sometimes for people to recognize that they have complicated feelings or they're struggling through their decision. I think we have to be able to create space for that. And I think abortion providers also do this. Like when people are going in for their appointments, providers talk with people, they counsel them, they talk with them about, you know, let's go through this. Like, they're not sort of in this situation where you walk into a clinic and like, you have to continue down that path. I mean, I've been in rooms where providers are having those conversations. So anyway, all of this is just to say that it's okay for it to be complicated. It's also okay for it not to be complicated. But that ultimately doesn't mean that even if it is complicated and someone does decide to have an abortion and that it's the wrong decision. And there's this huge study. I know I've talked a lot about studies, but I just, I'm a journalist. I always want to be like, there's evidence. But the turnaway study, which was by an academic out of the University of California, San Francisco, her name's either Diana Green Foster or Diana Foster Green. I'm so sorry, off the top of my head, I can't remember which order, but it surveyed tens of thousands of women about their abortion experiences. And those who were unable to get an abortion, and this is another myth, is that people regret their abortions. People do not regret their abortions. People, even if they're struggling with it afterwards, generally feel relief and this sense freedom. And so ultimately it's the most intimate individual decision a person can make. And I really don't think that anybody except for the individual and who they choose to let into their decision making process really needs to have an opinion. Agreed.
A
I'll just add it's okay for you, you meaning anyone, to be firm on what your choice would be without transferring that to everybody else. I think for me it's caring less about what other people's choices are, more about that we have the opportunity to make that choice that is the basis of freedom and responsibility and all the things we claim to hold dear. And as, as I said at the beginning, the hill I'm willing to die on, though I hope I don't have to die. Rebecca, thank you for the very important work that you're doing, for writing both of these books and for being here today. So again, I just want to reiterate, the book is called Access. Get it on Amazon or wherever you buy books or go to your local bookstore. Let's keep them in. Rebecca's website is rebeccaggrant. Com. We're going to put her links, every way to find and follow her, as well as a link to get the book in show notes. Rebecca, thank you.
B
Thank you so much. I really enjoyed our conversation. I appreciate you having me on.
A
Me too. Okay, friend, here is where I land. We can debate politics, we can disagree on policies, we can rant about the hypocrisy, and we can fight about the details. But underneath it all, the thread that ties this podcast together, the thing that ties woman's work together, is choice. Choice is the foundation. It's the starting line, the through line and the finish line. The freedom to decide what is right, true and real for you, about your body, your career, your relationships, your future. Without it, we cannot be free or have equity. And if we're serious about rewriting the rules, torching the supposed tos, and shedding the shoulds, and trust me, I am serious about that, then we have to protect and fight for the one thing that makes all of it possible. Your right, my right, our right to choose. Redefining woman's work isn't about giving the same answer or following the same path. It's about claiming the right to choose your own. Simply put, choice isn't part of the definition. It is the definition. This is woman's work.
Podcast: This Is Woman's Work with Nicole Kalil
Episode: Access, Agency & The Abortion Underground with Rebecca Grant | 358
Air Date: November 3, 2025
Host: Nicole Kalil
Guest: Rebecca Grant, journalist and author
This episode explores the evolving landscape of reproductive rights in the U.S., focusing on access, agency, and the realities of abortion care post-Dobbs. Nicole and guest Rebecca Grant—an acclaimed journalist and author of Access: Inside the Abortion Underground and the 60 Year Battle for Reproductive Freedom—delve into the historical, legal, and social complexities surrounding abortion, the myths that persist, and the impact of recent legal and medical shifts. Above all, the conversation is a call to protect individual choice and equity for women.
Rebecca Grant provides a historical overview:
Most significant recent shift:
"If you oppose abortion, don’t have an abortion. That feels fairly straightforward to me. But imposing that…on other people…I still have a hard time understanding."
(37:24, Rebecca)
"Choice is the foundation. It's the starting line, the through line and the finish line. The freedom to decide what is right, true and real for you… Without it, we cannot be free or have equity."
(41:14, Nicole, episode closing)
On the fundamental persistence of abortion:
The episode underscores that "woman's work," and true freedom and equity, revolve around each woman’s power to choose—for her body, health, and future. Despite escalating legal and political battles, Rebecca Grant’s reporting (and history itself) demonstrates the enduring demand for, and innovation around, abortion access. The fight for agency and dignity continues, but the message is clear: choice is not part of the definition of freedom—it is the definition.